Social contract theories

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • Basic philosophies of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Serves as a foundation for American democracy and the revolution in early American history

КОМЕНТАРІ • 99

  • @virtuafighter3
    @virtuafighter3 4 роки тому +61

    After years of searching for a clear-cut contrast of these thinkers, I finally find something direct and clear. You are a gifted communicator sir. Well done.

  • @shehata-2428
    @shehata-2428 6 років тому +63

    I have a test tomorrow. this helped a lot. thank you!

    • @b.millan1588
      @b.millan1588 2 роки тому +1

      ✌️✌️that's why am here too

  • @BeshoyNagieb
    @BeshoyNagieb 7 років тому +12

    Thank you for the brief introduction. I have a major in Literature so to have an overview of Social Contract and its history would have taken me one full day.

  • @lolawkward4033
    @lolawkward4033 3 роки тому +2

    if i could give you a hug I would. thank you for such a detailed and CLEAR explanation with visuals. LOVE YOU

  • @PieterSteens
    @PieterSteens 7 років тому +5

    I'm in awe as to how good the automatic subtitles are.

  • @mayagaffney5064
    @mayagaffney5064 3 роки тому +7

    Thank you for this information, I couldn't grasp these concepts until I watched this video. Keep up the good work!

  • @princekerlquirante929
    @princekerlquirante929 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much for this sir, your discussion can be easily understand and is direct to the point, this is definitely what I've been looking for.

  • @stephaniemorris5139
    @stephaniemorris5139 7 років тому +5

    Thank you so much! My professor's video had been removed and have to write a paper based on this subject. You really helped me understand what I am supposed to be talking about!

  • @gumigumila3572
    @gumigumila3572 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much! This helped me understand it clearly, especially their perspectives in relation with the social contract theory

  • @abbiethebratzfan
    @abbiethebratzfan 5 років тому +4

    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS. YOU ARE AMAZING. KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DO.

  • @retrowave9491
    @retrowave9491 4 роки тому +1

    Such an amazing video. Made professionally.!

  • @lovejeetmaan6504
    @lovejeetmaan6504 6 років тому +5

    thnkq ,these videoes are awesome and really helps me in the prepration of my exam

  • @knowledgedomain6333
    @knowledgedomain6333 7 років тому +4

    its interesting and also helpful......... Thank you very much

  • @cookies_aand_cream4468
    @cookies_aand_cream4468 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much! I couldn't grasp this information and after watching this video, I'm able to!

  • @maryannbigtas5829
    @maryannbigtas5829 3 роки тому +2

    Explain clearly. Thank you so much.

  • @owlnyc666
    @owlnyc666 Рік тому +1

    I liked the comparison summary at 8:08 And at 8:49! Short and clear 🤔😉

  • @luqmanturaki
    @luqmanturaki 8 років тому +20

    omg thank you so much for sumarissing all their views i have sociology exam next week thank you sir😊☺

    • @zhangdingkang781
      @zhangdingkang781 8 років тому +2

      +luqman turaki Political philosophy exam for me tomorrow! Hope your exam went well.

  • @yeabuddy1610
    @yeabuddy1610 4 роки тому +2

    Great video! My only criticism is that Hobbes didn’t necessarily favor monarchy by virtue of primogeniture, but rather by virtue of being absolutist in power.

  • @nahomayele6583
    @nahomayele6583 3 роки тому +1

    Great work loved it❤

  • @karinaduarte229
    @karinaduarte229 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you! The video was on point!

  • @eljosi9620
    @eljosi9620 5 років тому +2

    You're saving my politics and economy exam, thanks

  • @ashraffruslan1480
    @ashraffruslan1480 7 років тому +1

    very helpful. thank you so much!!

  • @sumaiyasimi1443
    @sumaiyasimi1443 2 роки тому

    You're great! Thank you!

  • @sabblues
    @sabblues 3 роки тому +1

    thank you, this helped a lot!

  • @owenintheagon
    @owenintheagon 3 роки тому

    Never realized the characters in Lost were a reflection of these philosophies

  • @kuzeydengelirken
    @kuzeydengelirken Рік тому +1

    thanks a lot, that is such a useful summary😇

  • @nahyan7511
    @nahyan7511 7 років тому

    What did Hobbes mean by 'awe'?

  • @nishat542
    @nishat542 6 років тому +2

    Love it

  • @SandroMassarani
    @SandroMassarani 3 роки тому

    Great video.

  • @allcopsareterrorists
    @allcopsareterrorists Рік тому +1

    Why is David Hume never taught along side these guys?

  • @kimcastellanos7586
    @kimcastellanos7586 3 роки тому +1

    thank you for this it really helped

  • @karandeepkumar5925
    @karandeepkumar5925 6 років тому +2

    thank you buddy. This is a really nice video.

  • @australianbleach8594
    @australianbleach8594 3 роки тому

    Hey guys. Can someone drop the sources of where he got this information. Would love to do the reading myself

  • @kayleighjoan5281
    @kayleighjoan5281 4 роки тому +7

    You sound just like Owen Wilson! 😱

  • @zakhonambatha9818
    @zakhonambatha9818 3 роки тому

    I have an essay due and this helps

  • @franklinfalco9069
    @franklinfalco9069 6 років тому +2

    Hobbes may not have been exactly right but there are still things we can learn from him.

  • @amishakumari4772
    @amishakumari4772 4 роки тому

    It helped me a lot😊😊😊

  • @rachitaurora
    @rachitaurora 2 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @basak6844
    @basak6844 2 роки тому

    it helped a lot thank you

  • @mungimichael3131
    @mungimichael3131 3 роки тому

    I have an Exam on Saturday to be specific “22nd May 2021” and is a law paper “Jurisprudence “

  • @januaryqin2266
    @januaryqin2266 4 роки тому

    I feel that Thomas Hobbss way it's easy to live with, the people need peace more than power, otherwise..... fighting?

  • @sonigrover846
    @sonigrover846 4 роки тому

    very helpful

  • @amishakumari4772
    @amishakumari4772 4 роки тому

    Thxx sir 😊😊

  • @RedeemedPhoenix
    @RedeemedPhoenix 6 років тому +1

    very helpful. thanks

  • @stimulantdaimamld2099
    @stimulantdaimamld2099 11 місяців тому

    great

  • @sharofs.6576
    @sharofs.6576 3 роки тому

    wtf was that "be safe out there " about?

  • @lubu523
    @lubu523 Рік тому

    I am living in a monarchist country, and so far, yea, we are praised for our peaceful environment but hated for restrictions of freedom

  • @jasonderby7635
    @jasonderby7635 8 років тому

    your thoughts on racism and the inherent "good" of man.

  • @divyanshmimrot1302
    @divyanshmimrot1302 4 роки тому

    Very good content..👍🏻👍🏻

  • @daisycorleto7244
    @daisycorleto7244 7 років тому +5

    What about machiavelli?

    • @ghadbanaaa
      @ghadbanaaa 7 років тому +13

      Machiavelli is not a social contract theorist

    • @gorgorgorgorgor1
      @gorgorgorgorgor1 6 років тому

      He's a precursor to social contract theory.

    • @muhaiman22
      @muhaiman22 5 років тому +1

      Makaveli in this Killuminati, all through your body
      The blow's like a twelve gauge shotty
      Uhh, feel me!
      And God said he should send his one begotten son
      To lead the wild into the ways of the man
      Follow me; eat my flesh, flesh and my flesh
      Come with me, Hail Mary
      Run quick see, what do we have here
      Now, do you want to ride or die
      La dadada, la la la la
      I ain't a killer but don't push me
      Revenge is like the sweetest joy next to gettin' p****
      Picture paragraphs unloaded, wise words bein' quoted
      Peeped the weakness int he rap game and sewed it
      Bow down, pray to God hoping that he's listenin'
      Seein' n****s comin' for me, to my diamonds, when they glistenin'
      Now pay attention, rest in peace father
      I'm a ghost in these killin' fields
      Hail Mary…

    • @toomanydrugsinmysys5414
      @toomanydrugsinmysys5414 4 роки тому

      Ngga run quick see

  • @MarcoPolo1299
    @MarcoPolo1299 5 років тому

    5:35 Why are you implying Hobbes favored a monarchy form of government? Did you actually read Leviathan? Or at least part 2? The section about commonwealth? The rights of sovereign and the type of common wealth (monarchy, aristocracy, democracy).

  • @catsaresocute650
    @catsaresocute650 2 роки тому

    Locke is actually ambivalent, he does point out, maybe more alludes to (but hidden in the religious part) that actually woman should have an equal share(?) It's relatevised immidiatly in a or maybe not, but not a definete not, rather a polite since that seems the case in all cultures, while also having pointed out and pointing out that so is the case with monarchy

    • @catsaresocute650
      @catsaresocute650 2 роки тому

      It's not actually resonable to say he means only men

    • @catsaresocute650
      @catsaresocute650 2 роки тому

      I mean okay I know most people shut their brain of when it becomes religious and it's like one sentence, but STILL

    • @catsaresocute650
      @catsaresocute650 2 роки тому

      You could just read it, it's for free or listen that's also possible for free

  • @Robsay01
    @Robsay01 2 роки тому +1

    We all wanted Locke’s visions. Rousseau’s and “will of the people” became to hard to define and practice. Right now, Hobbes, rules. This means humans suck.

  • @johnrossini3594
    @johnrossini3594 4 роки тому +1

    of the three i choose rousseau

  • @dablueninja2.026
    @dablueninja2.026 2 роки тому

    This guy sound like Owen Wilson

  • @agario-km9cs
    @agario-km9cs 4 роки тому +6

    Why you make this video now we have work to do in our class 😡🤬🤬

  • @36cmbr
    @36cmbr 4 роки тому

    The state of nature is not a theory & It is equivalent to man in his natural habitat. The philosophy which comes closest to describing man in his habitat is that of Russo. Subsequent political theories that would recognize the reality of the natural state, and embrace the energy of it through that recognition are all political theories represented by various Constitutional authorities. It’s an ‘in the eye of god thing’.

  • @karensmith973
    @karensmith973 7 років тому

    Have you researched the mandela effect? What are your thoughts on it?

  • @JJuli
    @JJuli 6 років тому +1

    Good guy Rousseau is good

  • @southernSCkid
    @southernSCkid 6 років тому +1

    OK PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME
    UNDERSTAND, how would Rousseau inspire Marxism , when to me it seems like he has an entirely libertarian view on government and man, asserting that when mankind is free to the highest extent they function the best, when Marxism is ultimate rlience upon the government???? Please let me know thanks!

    • @kbarikmo
      @kbarikmo  6 років тому +1

      Daniel Webb, thanks for your view and comment. Your point about Rousseau is well made. Marx never references him in his writings, but I make this claim for three reasons. 1. Rousseau eschews private property in his system; 2. He claims that political conflict arises from “conflict over things” and 3. People in his state of nature give up their freedom for the good of all, not protection of the individual. That’s why I make this claim. Thanks for viewing and for this dialogue.

    • @southernSCkid
      @southernSCkid 6 років тому

      Just earned a new sub , thank you so much !

    • @eduardohope4909
      @eduardohope4909 3 роки тому

      @@kbarikmo: I think a case could be made that either Marx or his buddy Engels paraphrased Rousseau's starting sentence in 'The Social Contract', where he writes that "Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The end of the 'Communist Manifesto' ends with: "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." I don't think it is mere coincidence; Rousseau's formulation was as much a grab-you-by-the-collar way to begin an essay as Marx & Engels's formulation was to end an essay.

  • @Radegastx0
    @Radegastx0 5 років тому

    "Emanuel" Kant? :-D

  • @indronilchoudhary9555
    @indronilchoudhary9555 5 років тому

    it was funny ...last

  • @conforzo
    @conforzo 4 роки тому

    Rousseaus ideas have been proved wrong many times, so I really wish academia would stop giving him all this attention.

    • @ronnie8489
      @ronnie8489 3 роки тому

      The same can be argued about Hobbes

    • @eduardohope4909
      @eduardohope4909 3 роки тому

      Which ideas have been proved wrong, and how?

    • @TheCommonS3Nse
      @TheCommonS3Nse 2 роки тому +1

      @@eduardohope4909
      What did he get wrong?
      Definitely his idea that excessive private accumulation of wealth can corrupt the government. That has definitely never happened in the history of civilization 🙄 Oh, and his concept of the general will and it’s relation to the social contract. Ps. Sarcasm intended.
      I hate it when these people with zero understanding of social contract theory come out and say “Rousseau was wrong”. There have been many social contract theorists throughout history. There is a reason that Rousseau’s name is among the three that everyone refers to.
      I’ve heard this quote said about Marx, but it could very well apply to Rousseau as well. “Everything he got wrong is definitive proof that he was clueless. Everything he got correct is now common knowledge.” These people have no clue how innovative these thinkers were. Yes, they got some things wrong, but their unique perspectives changed our understanding of the world we live in.

  • @voiceofREASONS
    @voiceofREASONS 2 роки тому

    Rousseau is not behind the philosophy of our current Govt, the environmental movement nor the modern public education system...

  • @123axel123
    @123axel123 5 років тому

    Slurring. a bit dumbed down, but fine

    • @kbarikmo
      @kbarikmo  5 років тому +1

      123axel123 FYI it was for high school students.

    • @123axel123
      @123axel123 5 років тому

      @@kbarikmo Great that high school students get this. Sadly, university teaching i probably not more advanced.

  • @xyoungdipsetx
    @xyoungdipsetx 5 років тому

    I agree and disagree with John Locke same for Thomas Hobbes

  • @thelordofgifts5343
    @thelordofgifts5343 Рік тому +1

    Hobbes was right

    • @wilhelmthedon
      @wilhelmthedon 11 місяців тому

      Not completely, his idea of the sovereign being able to provide complete security is irrational. A sovereign cannot be all knowing about things like petty crime, and small- scale corruption. Apart from that I agree with his ideas.

  • @jshir17
    @jshir17 3 роки тому

    The Disabled Person’s Social Contract
    This template is a guide for disabled and non-disabled people alike to better coexist.[i] This contract should be signed and notarized.
    1. Give equal time (and number of words) to both speakers and do not interrupt or talk over the disabled person.
    2. Speak at relatively the same pace, tone, and volume as the disabled person (not with loud shouting or an infantilizing lisp-lullaby)
    3. Be open to having everything in your interaction with the disabled person being video and or audio recorded in order to protect the disabled person
    4. Focusing the conversation upon facts and matters of substance rather than personal opinions and subjective value judgments about disability.
    [i] Due to the historical genocide and terrorism of society against the disabled it has become necessary to draft a contract to negotiate fair-minded and ethical rules for non-disabled people to interact with the disabled.

  • @tobaj1484
    @tobaj1484 2 роки тому

    Thank you!