18 Core CPUs!? - Intel Xeon E5 2699 v3 Processor Overclocking & Testing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
- Intel Xeon 2699 v3, the 18 core MONSTER - we got two for our new rendering machine, but how does one perform on a normal X99 motherboard?
Ring Video Doorbell link: Head over to bit.ly/1KzEW8W and use offer code RingLovesLinus to save $20 off the Ring Video Doorbell! (Only valid for the first 100 units purchased)
Pricing & discussion: linustechtips.com/main/topic/3...
Support us: linustechtips.com/main/topic/7...
Join our community forum: bit.ly/ZkLvE7
/ linustech
/ linustech
Title: Laszlo - Supernova
Video Link: • [Electro] - Laszlo - S...
iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com/us/album/sup...
Artist Link: / laszlomusic
Outro Screen Music Credit: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High / approachingnirvana
Title: Volant - Full Circle
Video Link: • [Glitch Hop] - Volant ...
Beatport Download Link: pro.beatport.com/release/full...
Label Channel: / monstercat
Title: Muzzy - Feeling Stronger (feat. Charlotte Colley)
Video Link: • [DnB] - Muzzy - Get Cr...
Beatport Download Link: pro.beatport.com/release/get-...
Label Channel: / monstercat - Наука та технологія
You know your a pro PC builder when you have thermal paste in your kitchen cabinet
xD
+Ido Tanne yet he apply the thermal past like a noob and not spreading it all over it.
+stylos951 You're supposed to spread it all over? Applying too much is worse isn't it?
+Ido Tanne "Pro builder" made a noob mistake on applying thermal paste.
not to mention his "overclocking" is something that an elementary schooler could do..
Just a kid with overpriced toys in my opinion.. no real knowledge or skill in here.
+Ido Tanne I do also have thermal paste in my bathroom, should I be worried?
And in 2021 x99 xeon became one of the most popular gaming CPUs :D
I have a 2680 V4 14c/28thread on the way. It will be a massive upgrade from the i5 3470 I built new....
I have this specific cpu but I have the better 2696 v3 which can boost up to 3.8 ghz and I was able to mod the motherboard to make it run 3.5 ghz base speed and 3.8ghz on all cores under full load with full 8 hour stability
Just built a 2695 v4 with 64gb ram, 1tb ssd for under £350!
These cpus are amazing for the price right now!
no, i just need it for ESXi and virtualization for a workstation. I paired it with 128gb of ram and 4 4TB drives in raid 5.
Not everything is gaming in this life.
@@davefroman4700 bro how much good is your cpu ? I'm thinking about buying that cpu for RTX 3080. I have 1080p monitor but maybe I can go above like 1440p.
How did they fit 18 cores in this?
AMD: "Hold my beer"
Amd did that with 7nm this is 22nm. 3x times bigger node and about 9x less space. I think that's to this day still quite impressive.
How much was it 5 years ago
@@w04h it runs at 2.3ghz lmao
@@twizz420 yup and i still use my i7 5820k to game on 12 cores overclocked to 5ghz. still no bottlenecks and way smoother gaming experience. no judder or microstutter. 32 gb of quad channel ripjaws dont hurt either.
@@rextrowbridge8386 whats the voltage?
this looked so special back in the day until threadripper came
Still cheaper than the Apple Watch Edition
D:
Alonsy
My house is cheaper than apple watch :(
The Tech wtf so true.
My paper bag was cheaper than that Apple watch shit -.-
Lets see you render a 4K video!
Are you making cubing videos anymore? I really miss them!
MeMyselfAndPi This. Has to be 144 fps video, too.
MeMyselfAndPi yes 4k is what we want! linus do 4k render test
InitialHat
What's the point, we can't see 4K on UA-cam.
Galaxy Guardian UA-cam has had 4k play back for a couple of months now.
That CPU costs like 15 of my computers.
10 of mine
4 of mine
about 0.1 of me
+TheKazen 0.01111111
4 of mine as well
watching this in 2019 with threadripper is kind of funny
64 cores
Not that funny when the cost of this is now a quarter of the price for 60% of the performance
*cries in corner*
Johnny Silverstone *hands over a tissue* "Got Room"
s1r_dr2g0n *looks at A8 5600k*
"come in"
s1r_dr2g0n *puts hand on shoulder* dont worry... it will be affordable in... 6 years. *single tear*
Full-Metal_Jacob *starts crying even more violently than before*
Kheso *Unzips*
Ha.
I used to have HARD DRIVE that WAS 16MB!!!
1MB of RAM was TOP OF THE LINE.
+n00b247 Reminds me of my good old 450 MHz Pentium II I had, daaaamn the good old days...nowadays even my fucking smartphone can outperform a cpu like that
+TheWuerstchenwasser no dude! Your smart phone is a lot faster than your good old day computer.
+n00b247
HA!
Now if you have 2TB hard drive do you have 128 or 256GB RAM?
+TheWuerstchenwasser my note 3 scores twice as much on the geek benchmark than my dual core 2.1 pentium 4 powered laptop. jusy sayin'
+n00b247 IBM used to sell HDDs the size of an industrial refrigerator w/ capacity of 5 MB.
I'm still using this chip in late 2019! There's a bug in these v3 chips where as you can run the turbo full time all the time on every core with a multiplier of x36! You simply need to remove the CPU microcode from the motherboard BIOS. With a bus of 103mhz, I'm running 3.7Ghz on all 18 cores. Obviously under 100% load though, it will drop speed. With all 36 threads at 100% and using Prime95 the multi is 24-25. Running at 1/2 of threads (18), the multi is 28-29. Running normally usage (AKA not some synthetic heat producer test), the cores all stay at 36 multi. It's very fast for an older processor that can be found pretty reasonable now.
Which motherboard are you using
I'm very interested in this cpu's i want to buy a xeon e5 2660 v3 but i don't know which motherboard would be good for doing overclock and turbo unlock :D
@@rampi7082 Using an ASRock X99 Extreme 6, Xeon 2699v3, 128GB ECC RAM
Thinking about finding a cheap one for my sabertooth x99 lol
You can even undervolt this cpu to squeeze more juice out of it. I can get 5700pt in Cinebench R20 with a -0.090v undervolt on the core and -0.050v on the cache. Running a non-AVX load like Cinebench R15, it hits 3.05GHZ when all 18 cores are stressed. After the turbo hack, what's limiting these are really their TDPs.
Thanks for posting this. I was wondering if the turbo unlock would play nicely with the 103mhz boost going to put an e5-2690 with the x99 f8 chinese board
he got thermal paste in his kitchen.......................
that wasn't his kitchen, back then that was their office
I ts the recording place of LTT at that stage, ith rheid office
Do you not, casul?
Probably puts it on his toast in the morning :)
and I'm just sitting here next to my i3 and cooling it with my tears
Adam Farkas athlon 64 x2 4200+ :'(
Pentium 4 :, (
Core 2 Duo 1.3 GHz :(
Adam Farkas lol, race to the bottom. a10-7850k
Ok i'm going for it...
AMD FX-4100... "Fake" quadcore -_-.. Yes it hurts.. I really understand.. Even my athlon before.. Or your i3 will punch this sucker in half.. O wait it allready is
So, how fast will this render a 1-hour 1080p60 first-person shooter gaming video at 20-25 variable Mbps?
You watch LinusTechTips too!
*Has Near 200,000 subs*
*Doesn't have a personal profile pic*
XD
davidangel64 Hi there X, thought i remembered the channel name ;)
davidangel64 So high bitrate? Use more H264 features and shrink it to 6 MBPS.
***** I do use H.264 and its features. The bitrate is high intentionally; UA-cam has support for Enterprise-level uploads (20 Mbps - 50 Mbps) and I take advantage of that on my channel.
he keeps his thermal compound in his kitchen's cupboard
huh nerd
hes not in an actual living space i think lel
In case of a to hot coffee
Sturmpanzer IV LOL IT'S TRUTH
watch the tour video, youll see the whole place.
Was able to get this renewed from Amazon at 50$...8 years later
about to overclock to 2.8Ghz..
Will be a great video editing machine
Thanks Linus
*All I ever see are Intel products being promoted, why no AMD? Are you biased Linus?*
*0.0*
When AMD releases exciting new products we're on them. We even borrowed an R9 295X2 when that launched and they didn't send us one. The issue is that AMD hasn't really released a new enthusiast grade CPU in years. How am I supposed to get excited about making a video about a 3-4 year old product? When AMD releases Zen and it kicks ass (let's hope) we will cover it.
MegaBoomeranger Because AMD hasn't released anything good, CPU wise, in years. That's also why Intel doesn't feel the need to make better chips than just 5 to 10% better than the previous gen.
Rekt.....sorry, I had to.
MegaBoomeranger [ ] Not rekt. [X] REKT.
MegaBoomeranger LOL.... I think he is not biased. He actually does reviews on the best product, which is Intel atm. I can see you are not bias, but pissed probably because you are running AMD... RIGHT!
Someday, 18 cores will be normal for a regular gaming PC
+tony052803 Probably in 2-3 years to be honest. Sony just came out with a phone that has 4 cores. We are moving amazingly when it comes to technology.
Btw, you should check out distributed computing projects and find some that you like. I personally participate on World Community Grid!! Let me know if you need help wit this.
+Ernie Sanz phones have had 4 cores along time now...
since 2012
+Mike Hines Wow you are right, my mistake. But yea, I think 18 cores will be the standard before we know it.
+Mike Hines Also, you should really start contributing to distributed computing projects! Check them out and see how you can make technology improve even faster!
+Ernie Sanz Passbook from RIM had 4 cores a couple of years ago.
18 core CPUs will probably be around in 10 to 15 years for PCs.
We are already at 8 core from AMD.
calls a $1000 consumer grade processor for peasants, only has a 780TI on the test bench...
Mastrhix chill this was a year ago
ok
Sarcasm :-)
4 years ago
If it fits, he sits :D
"Wussy, core i7-5960x"...
I'm literally watching this on an e8400...
ben esherick..?
Hey Intel it's me your brother
I understood that reference
Elijah Nguyen I understood that combination of letters.
***** no its not
Joggy hey its your cousin, brother
Neko uh.. hi
I would like to know what that Hello Kitty key is for.. 3:38
berry_Nekozi Good eye!
His car keys I think?
His chatity device.
Reap Dungeon
Learning about servers and followed your server vs desktop CPUs video, to your Intel vs Xeon video, and finally to this. I think this is the best one yet. I love how excited and happy you are! And getting to see your process and reasoning as you go. :D Plus, your keyboard looks like a Star Trek input panel. :D
Does that keyboard come with the "Barbie Typewriter"?
lol
When you get the dual-Xeon motherboard put 8 GTX Titan X's, 256gb of ram and DESTROY any benchmark ever made lol
TommyThousandFaces and wallet, too...
Michael Morrison Unfortunately it's not possible to destroy or crash anything for free yet in this world hahaha
TommyThousandFaces some dude will do it simply to have that #1 spot on 3d mark.
That's not how a dual cpu motherboard works
MrBait09 Actually I think could be possible but I've never saw anyone do it. Dual CPU systems actually do share all the PCI lanes.
I took the risk of saying something stupid I know XD
This would be a dream to have to render my scenes in 3DS Max xD
5 years later... Ryzen 9 exists
@@Haywood-Jablomie And don't forget Threadripper
@@hammyboigaming904 Dont forget the price of the Threadripper. These are bargains now.
soon to be in a LTT "budget build" or "bang for your buck" build
But can it run Crysis?
Joel Andersson nope
YES,bitch!!!
with a 2.3ghz clock rate? probably at about 10 fps.
2.3 ghz but 18 cores dude means its like 18 core i5 = 1
Nam Phuong its more like 8 bottom tier i5's. which still dosent make a difference on things that demand high clock speeds, like video games.
I would like to know how fast it would encode a video file ^^
Kazu Thinking the same. A test for its purpose would be nice.
Kazu depending on software your GPU might actually more important. Also, if you are reading large video files (for example RAW video) from a slow SSD that can also be THE bottleneck so it's tough to build a system where you can really use the performance of such an insanely powerful CPU
The SSD can be a bottleneck, if you CPU is capable of writing more data than you SSD can. It would slow down the CPU because the SSD could not handle more. That's what he meant.
*****
On the machine I work with at work, the SSD *is* the bottleneck. I'm not making stuff up ;)
haiggoh get raid 0 :)
can it run 3840 × 2160 Minesweeper explosion simultaneously?
Akaash Ram I think you're asking too much from it.
Bartosz hahahahah I LOL
Bartosz TheMightyChris901 IDC. *This has to be done.*
Akaash Ram no, 18
Bartosz 3840 × 2160 != 180
My favorite part of this video is when Linus goes to the cupboard to get thermal paste.
Just got myself a 2698v3 xeon unlocked it's turbo boost on all core and coupled with an undervolt this thing's a beast!
And I thought my new i5 was a great CPU considering I was coming from a G3258. Lol
Anthony Jones Better than the piece of shite that I'm using
Tipichounet WHat are you using G32020 lol
Anthony Jones X4 860k, the bottleneck factory.
Absolutely not, the G3258 is a great CPU, id recommend overclocking it though, thats what I did. Plus I cooled it with Corsair Hydro H80i. Id have to recommend aftermarket cooling though if overclocking,
***** Depends on how you intend to use it. If you want to run the latest games you may run into trouble as some games actually check for more than 2 cores. Also the latest AAA games aren't going to let you run at high res with all the graphic options enabled with that processor even married to a Titan, but the G3258 will work fine at lower resolutions if you overclock it.
I've been using one for the past year and played Borderlands 2 and Borderlands the Pre-Sequel with no issues. I do plan to upgrade later this year once desktop Broadwell and Skylake processors are out and the pricing settles, but that's as much future proofing as something useful today.
This is amazing, dat CineBench render.
I'd love to see a AME render test at like 4K, using SSDs to eliminate as many bottlenecks as possible.
EposVox ssd is still slow, so a ramdisk would be better in the case of "Bottlenecks" but not in a real world scenario of course is just to see the speed.
Johnny Deep Well yeah, but ramdisk isn't real-world, like you said lol. I'd still want it to be applicable to a realistic workflow.
My first PC had 8MB of RAM and a CPU of like 40MHz,
jesus christ we've come a long way
8gb bro :V not MB
Anime Music VN yes he meant mb
I still sometimes boot up my upgraded PC XT with a stacked RAM configuration to get it up to 512K of RAM, running 4.7 Mhz clock speed. Not a speed demon, but it still does what it was made for well.
I'm glad u did this, 5 years ago u bought a 5820k and now my rendering in cad is killing me because how slow the 6 cores is now. I'm looking at buying a 2698 v3 and a bunch of ram! 🙏🏿
Lol it still uses less power than the AMD FX-9590
xXDahChubChubXx Lol it still is half as fast as the AMD FX-9590 and has less singlecore performance. T_T Besides the fact that you are comparing a consumer chip to a server chip, which actually use about the same amount of power, you also don't seem to know what TDP means. With the TDP the manufacturers specify the maximum heat output in Watts at which the CPUs can safely operate for a long period of time. The FX 9590 has such a high TDP, because they are specially selected chips with extremely high stability thus beeing able to operate safely at way higher loads than 'bad silicon' FX 8350s for example.
Razor Blade k
Razor Blade Wasen't comparing speeds and yeah in gaming and in single core the AMD would probably win but i don't care, i was comparing how much more grunt it has and how much more stuff is in it compared to the AMD chip and comparing the TDP
xXDahChubChubXx With the speed I just wanted to say that they are sacrificing on something to achieve this. Overall both chips have around the same processing power, but it is used in different ways. It's like you got a 600HP engine and you can either use it with a low gear ratio to move more load with less speed or use a high gear ratio to move less load with more speed.
***** I have not looked it up but i believe you
And here i am with a mighty Core 2 Duo E6750 and a AMD Radeon HD 4670 1GB, plus 4 GB of DDR2 RAM.
I dont have money for a new PC.I should go cry in a corner :(
I can't even afford a desktop :( I have to use my phone
The Feels :'(
Wetpig I'm sitting here with an unfinished desktop since last september because my mother decided to steal all my money
That's pretty shitty :(
Wetpig AMD Athlon 64x2 +4600,video with 128 mb of memory,1GB RAM DDR2 333mhz.
Hi,-It's good to know the "regular" RAM will work with a Xeon E5 on a consumer board. I've just managed to get a Xeon E5-2697 v3 2nd hand!-The brand new price is just too much!-So, the E5-2697 v3 isn't that far off the one you tested and will be great on an X99 OC Formula or SOC Champion or any other X99 motherboard.
Thanks for the video, it's very helpful
But can it blend?
That is the question
n n n naa naa n n n naa naa ....
Please no
shut the fuck up
You can clearly see Linus having a nerdgasm about this CPU. Your channel is becoming porn...soon it will be removed from UA-cam
^^ these guys don't get the joke
I wonder how intel feels about you guys doing this lol. But THROW THAT SHIT INTO SOME GAMES!
Rule907 It won't be any better than an i7 at games.
***** It won't be much worse either.
It should be much worse. Most games don't optimise more than 2-4 cores and this chip has a lower per-core clock speed.
On the other hand, of the game scales well with number of cores, you be flyin son
Rule907 Most games aren't very multithreaded and if you look closely on the cinebench single core test he did the 4790k won by close to 20% so unless you are playing a very CPU intensive game, that uses a ton of cores, the Xeon would probably preform worse. Still on most games the difference would be unnoticeable I'd imagine.
sablanex That depends on the game. Some games can use all cores available, which means that each core will be running at the lowest frequency (2.30 GHz) here, while others can use only four, six or eight cores, which in terms of the E5-2699 v3, is a turbo frequency of just 2.90 GHz with eight cores. Compared to the i7-5960X, which can turbo up to 3.30 GHz with eight cores, plus the i7 has the more appropriate instruction set extensions, the i7 will offer better performance there.
Hard to believe these were $4500 back in the day when they were released. I just purchased 2 of these CPUs for a home server just to play around on for the whopping cost of $85 EACH! Nothing like a 98% reduction in cost!
Now they are $35 on eBay! 99.2% off of retail.
I remember that feeling, when you get something new and WICKED fast. I bought dual, quad-core opterons back in the day, right after quad-cores were introduced, I put two of them in a server board and overclocked them from 1.8ghz to 2.4ghz (damn good overclockers). I used that computer for a lot of years and it was amazing for SETI and video editing. I'd love to have two $4000 18-core CPUs today, but that would put the cost of the computer over $10k and that's more than I want to spend. It was nice to see these though, thanks for sharing. :)
now you can do that
@@Processador_DE_BaixaQualidade lmao
lucky for you these are 100 bucks a pop these days
once again linus laughs in the face of those that are relieved to have build their system without breaking anything and tries to overclock a CPU worth the cost of a used car.
***** he didnt mess with voltage so there's no reason to freak out.
***** Yeah, I see what you are saying but he didn't really put the CPU in any risk at all. In the extremely unlikely event that all safety features fail, that means that the CPU was defective anyways.
Can it run Minecraft?
No, only Atari breakout.
Atari at 1fps lowest settings 144p
PRO3LEMS Minecraft? please now if your talking Minesweeper it just might blow up.
PRO3LEMS It can, about... 600 FPS
Filip Sebik i would belive it could reach more that 600 as my 4820 can reach 2k w/ 16 gb ddr3 and a 770
I`ve had the ring doorbell for about a year now. And now is the time to get a couple of the v3 also :)
It has so much cache it can surely take all one's cash also
Can this run paint well? If it does I will buy this....
PokerfaceStudioz you will probably be able to run paint on medium settings for around 20-35 fps
***** i hope you know i was joking
PokerfaceStudioz i can barley run minecraft with this cpu and i have a quad titanx
i have to lower the settings to low and play on 10fps
SPAM Sad thing is that he actually doesn't.
PokerfaceStudioz i think yes but in low settings you will probably get 5 fps and that the maximun fps
TO MUCH POWER LINUS! TOO MUCH POWAHHH!!!
Love your vids!!
Theguyordie Love your videos cant wait for tutorial tuesday
You watch LinusTechTips? Never new that lol
MindMiner123HD - Minecraft & More IKR
Yea Linus, I built my first Intel Computer since the dual proc 1ghz pent 3 Era. I bought a Xeon e5-2650 for 20$ on ebay, and an Intel dx79ti motherboard for 200$. Which outperformed any of my Previous AMD builds, By a Very large margin. Xeons are amazingly versatile and with the option for Registered ram, it's amazing.
Built my own custom pc im slowly becoming an enthusiast about these type of videos this is so cool
Should have done a render in blender
+Akshay Aradhya Should've done a render in Maya...
RocKurTime Not sure if it can render with a GPU but it definitely uses the CPU. You can actually even see each core rendering independently
+RocKurTime it renders with the CPU unless you change the parametre to put your graphiccard
+Monster LMA even a 560ti...
+Akshay Aradhya It can do both.
The question remains: can it run arma 3 multiplayer at ultra?
Nope
No, the real question is can it run minecraft at a stable 3.7 fps
Minecraft at a stable FPS? You're a funny man.
bestFreemaneva aka Rogue Freeman i have 170fps on ultra. 4790k at 4.5ghz
Christian Fokker lol, quit lying
Good job bro , very informative, keep it up
I recently bought a couple 1U servers with 2x14core E5-26xx and 128GB and 256GB RAM for less than $1K each. I needed some serious compute power for circuit modeling via optimization. There are some seriously good deals out there on older technology. Far better bang/buck for old servers.
What do you mean exactly I have couple systems myself I’m trying to put to the test one has dual e5 14 core, the other 18 core and I have titan xp but haven’t figured out what to test with yet and couple more systems as well
@@jong-yk3gk That depends on what you want to use your systems for. Passmark software's performance tests and MemTest86 have some benchmarks which might be interesting to you perhaps. I think that these older systems are mostly good for compute-intensive tasks which have a lot of arithmetic operations per memory access and are used for short bursts of hard computing such as engineering software or math-heavy operations and computations - e.g. optimization and/or simulation or perhaps some games? For 24-7 day after day heavy computation, you're likely better off with newer systems due to their greater power efficiency - and that depends on your electricity rates.
I would say that if you just want a big file server that's not heavily loaded with accesses, then get yourself an newer, single socket machine with ECC RAM, at least 32GB RAM (64GB likely better) and loads of slots for 3.5" drives. Ideally, you want hot-swap tool-less slots that let you slide the drives in and out. If you get an older machine for this, I recommend going with a single CPU socket to save energy.
Best
this guy T-shirt says holy balls
A bowling tee, I'm guessing?
They dont do bowling in Canada too cold. Thats why they have curling ; the pins freeze and shatter when hit.
798 people have pentium 4
Imagine fsx at that! The fps!
+RAZERZ just imagine that!! :), I have an i5 and runs at 30 and I've got lots of add-ons
MVasdf I only got pmdg 737 and a couple of other cuz I reinstall and I get about the same
+RAZERZ yeah it is a heavy bird by its own, but tweaking can also work wonders, like buffer pools and affinity mask
+MVasdf I gained 15fps by tweaking
I have a Dell Precision on the way via USPS. It has a Xeon E5-2697 v3 14-core CPU installed. I'm excited to play with it.
8 yrs later, now I got dual Xeon E5 26xx for over 100 bucks and its still powerful
"1000 peasant dollars" Totally stealing that! :)
Never seen Linus so happy lol
Incase if anybody is wondering the song @10:36 is Volant - Full Circle, AMAZING SONG!
I like the idea of keeping thermal paste in the kitchen cabinet.
What's next? 128 cores?
No, 22 cores.
Xeon Phi 7290 72 cores
36 cores
69 cores
666 Cores
Intel in 2014: 18 cores for 5000$ is top value and wont be beat
AMD in 2021: *Laughs in 64 cores 128 threads Threadrippers*
Edit: Oh now I know why they are called threadrippers
try getting a threadriupper for that price range LOL
@@RappinAcoustic yes an then apply the turbo unlock mod running both cpus at max turbo 3.7ghz all cores. Thats 36 cores an 72 threads for way less than a ripper cpu. Hence why i have two 2699V3 xeons.
AMD in 2023: Laughs in 128 cores 256 threads epyc
@@trinpanapan2990 it seems that my comment aged poorly
I would LOVE to see more videos about Xeons!!
Classic LTT video 👍. I just picked up 2 of these CPU’s. Gonna get me a Chinese 2 CPU motherboard and hopefully have a little fun. 😂
Why did you try the overclock with the gaming RAM and not the Kingston RAM?
Discovery
S666G666 The Kingston ECC RAM does not support XMP, and all new consumer grade RAM and motherboards use XMP to overclock.
Kevin Stampe Overclocking using XMP is redundant. You could simply manually overclock.
S666G666 xeon chips are locked so you cannot do a traditional multiplier overclock and I believe the ECC RAM would have issues as it is not very overclock friendly. xmp and manual base overclock deal with the bus and affect everything, ECC would possibly throw errors and/or result in the system not booting
Jacob R With newer chips you can separately overclock the CPU strap, without changing the base clock (I think with Xeon chips as well). So changing the CPU strap will not overclock the ECC RAM.
I come from the future, and wanted to run some good ol' games. Can I run Minesweeper on a 48 core Intel Sigma M9 5.35 GHz, with a NVIDIA GeForce Alkaline 305A-Q 3.63 GHz 128 GB VRAM and 1 TB of DDR6 RAM?
Bought a Intel Sigma AL8 with 11.6 GHz with 64 cores, and the GPU is now replaced with a AMD Radeon HHD 95400-WUAQ 148 GB and 9.53 GHz.
I believe that's enough for a weak PC in the year 2028.
Dayum. I guess back then things were pretty cheap.
+VortexumGamer Well you should just wait until the year 2029 when the intel i69 comes out. It has about 5 billion cores. and when minesweeper 2 comes out. But hopefully hl3 will be released.
Half Life 3? It's already out!
+VortexumGamer I was believing you but that last one ... naaah ...
And to think i was considering buying one of these a few months back in a server. It had 2 of them with 128gb of ram for 2 grand.
Oh man, old linus videos are a trip
Damn we've come a LONG way in 4 years. This compared to thread ripper it just gets trounced.
I'm going to build a rendering system with the following specs:
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
128GB DDR4 Memory
Some 1.6 Kilowatt Poer Supply
And Thats all I decided.
Is that before or after the 5 rails of cocaine?
Lol. After.
Just for the record I wasn't acrually going to build this. It would be like a $10,000 machine.
***** It's low power for stability and longevity. By far and large the killer of CPUs is heat and increasing voltage stresses the silicon on a molecular level which thus increases heat as you overclock. So having highly efficient CPUs work less and spread it across many cores, you allow for example a 10 core 2.1Ghz processor to work just as well as a 4 Core 4Ghz processor and still be better at software optimised for many threads.
Especially take into consideration that your gaming PC isn't truly at 80-100% load as frequently as a workstation or server which can have hundreds or thousands of users on it on a 12 or even 24 hour basis.
EDIT: Consider a networking server in an office of 30 people. You could have 30 computers at $800 each, or 2 computers at $5,000 each that everyone connects to via cloud computing.
Peter Šori I don't really build servers or other things. That seems very smart I'll take that advice and go with 2 redundant psu's
2:47 I really went "Oh damn! Linus is such a pro he doesn't even need thermal compound!"
Ah the good old times, I actually came here after the Xeon Platinum dual cpu video of Linus after he said qoute "This is more like a future exercise to show that what it can be done in the future" and this E5 cpu was exactly like he said a future practice for Intel. By looking on the shelves today, we can easily find Threadripper with "just" 32 cores and 64 threads with the single core performance of the consumer cpu for around 1000$ max. Technology is truly speeding forward 👌.
Its crazy how my 8 core 3800x is almost as fast as this 22 core. WOW.
Not even close for workstation workloads
*reads title*
*laughs in Threadripper*
This guy^ he gets it.
I remember the day I went to render something on Blender with my Dual 12 Core AMD... it is something to behold. I can tell you though, games, run alot better on a machine with a higher clock speed and higher through put than a machine with a higher core count.
That doorbell is like ... from future or something. It is amazing. I could not believe my eyes. And CPU Is also cool.
Handling a $4000 CPU, you might want to wear an anti static wrist strap! Thumbs up though =)
+GadgetUK164 I thought the same thing
+GadgetUK164 Not necessary if you hold it correctly. In fact, anti static straps are useless unless you know what you're doing.
+Patrick Challita Wouldn't it be useless if you don't know what you're doing?
+3D3LTAGaming who does something without having a clue? Douche
+Patrick Challita Umm... People who overestimate their own abilities.
imagine this on a server board with 4 sockets for 72 cores and 144 threads and 1 tb of ram (server motherboards support that) aww yiss
Mattis Cuypers omotayo olayemi Check my channel thank you :) hope you like the videos
Mattis Cuypers finally i can play minecraft
1000earc How about this?
ark.intel.com/products/84685/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E7-8890-v3-45M-Cache-2_50-GHz
Supports 8 of these and 1536 GB of RAM
1000earc
gr8 m8
I can't wait to see the comparison between this and the new x299 18 core.
Watching this after the X series has been announced. And I can't stop thinking how in 2 years the performance of fairly (?) high end server chip has made it's way into a consumer platform. *WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE!*
4500$ proccesor.
"Well that's a ridiculous temperature.... Let's overclock it!"
Linus Sebastian, 2015
I know this is slightly unrelated to this video, but I'd love to see a comparison done between Gigabyte, EVGA, MSI, and ASUS X99 boards.
That'd be a good video. Sort of like the Z97 ones they did.
Mr Fuzz Man Motherboards don't effect performance that much, it's more about their specific features. That would be a very VERY boring video.
The Pancakeanator But in certain applications, one board is going to be more preferable over the other (e.g. video editing, audio production, gaming, etc.) and it would be nice to see a comparison done so that people can know which board they're probably going to want to buy so they don't spend more than they really need.
Mr Fuzz Man It would literally be a video looking at spec sheets, ie motherboard a is better for audio production because it has x feature and for the most part, other than reliability and overclocking/bios the motherboard does not matter. Need video editing? strong cpu, audio production? high end sound card, gaming? high end dedicated gpu
ASRock?
That Cinebench score of 2468 makes me feel much better with my 7820X's 1950-2050 :)
Watched this without audio. Still satisfied.
4500$ processor, 1$ haircut
Linus 5 years later(2020):
How did they fit 64 cores and 128 threads in this?
Well it's pretty cheap i found it on amazon for 200$, especially for 18 cores.
AMD's is overpriced.
YOU ARE WAY OVER MY HEAD
BUT I LOVE WATCHING THIS STUFF,
KEITH
I can't help but rewatch that crazy fast cinebench run
2015: OH WOW 18 CORES
2023: pffs we have 128 cores
crysis 3 with 4 way titan x?
xX_DYLM4N_Xx Linus only has 2
oh
I wonder if any game would give any sortof leverage for an 18 core cpu vs a the 5960k
xX_DYLM4N_Xx most games dont use more then 4 cores yet. Also 2.8ghz 18 core would probably lose to a 4.8ghz quad core in gaming
xX_DYLM4N_Xx i don't think so this is meant for more rendering and crisis wouldn't put any kind of that stress on it.
Douglas Gardner no games use 8
woow that cinebench test blew my mind hahah
I would love to see 2 of these Xeon CPUs on some heavy loading combined with 4 Titan X and throwing some high end games on there!
Its not a gaming CPU. i7 4790k at 4.5ghz would kill it in any game.
Nice video Linus.
UndyingGhost It wouldn't kill it, but 18 cores are useless in games. 2 cores are more of a standart in games. Some use 4 cores but not many
The i7 5820k kills the 4790k
FeaR FuZiioN Not in gaming. Core clock is still the king, 4Ghz stock on 4790k still beats anything.
These i7 are top of the line of their generation (non-X). They are very similar
Well an i5 4690k does just as good in gaming
It’s crazy to think that 4.5 years later AMD came out of nowhere and dropped a 64 core 128 thread processor for HEDT not even just server
We better start saving for that 256 core cpu in 2024.
the 3700x is not far of in cinbench at about 2000 never mind the big chips
ErikGPL Next year maybe, as they already have 128 Core EPYC Rome
That little lens in your door works wonders too. And you dont need batteries.
Loved your video!
I wanna assemble a machine like yours. Do you have any video that says how? Thanks!