What papers has the activist published? What is his education level? What makes him think that he is able to debate this issue? NOTHING - except his arrogance!
It sounds like Shawn is nothing more than a megaphone for the two groups he sited. He seems he isn't willing to do his own research to discover whether what he believes is true or not. Major media here in the US are making a big deal of the recent100F plus temperatures in Phoenix AZ. Of course, they blame it on climate change. Fact is Phoenix has always had 100F plus temperatures during the summer. When I was 18 and lifeguarding at a public pool in the Phoenix area, it was 117F the entire week. So the panic talk by the lame stream media of 110F going on now is ridiculous.
Mr Catt is not an expert on climate change. He is not trained as a climate scientist and has never had a scientific paper about the issue published in a scientific journal.
Yep, ancient Egypt may have been warmer than Britain 2023 on average, literally due to latitude, but as the global average as a whole it's not possible to have been as hot as today at the time. No way in hell.
Here's Brian a Nuclear physicist and engineer for 40 years and here's Shaun who left university with a degree in gender studies and never had a job. Who do you believe 🤔
I believe the engineers who threaten to resign when Brian tries to speak for their organizations. Deniers will want to keep that quiet so their suckers can blame censorship of him on the lizard people, when they're not too busy blaming wildfires on the space antifa space lasers from outer space.
@@kalashydra9016 "most of the scientists" is an appeal to authority. Also he's referring to the IPCC which is a political organisation. These activists don't understand science, they just repeat the dogma that everyone agrees with them, without actually looking at the data.
There needs to be another Munk type debate on climate alarmism. These alarmists are creating an alternative pseudo 'scientific ' world to make their case. This needs to be debunked in a public forum.
@@deryk2002au exactly this. One can't help but assume that the choice of opponent for Catt in this case was chosen for the sake of ratings and red hot television rather than to further a genuine scientific understanding of facts.
@@andyknowles772 He didn't actually say anything besides appeal for authority. His strongest argument: "Do you disagree with IPCC and with X million scientists? How dare you?" He knows nothing about the subject, he has no plan to propose except some nonsense that won't work but talking about it makes him feel better, and that is really what JSO is all about
@@utility00 yes and it's ok to appeal to authority....what the 'scientist' did was even worse.... Oh the IEA, ISPCC, climate scientists....I quote...they don't know what they are talking about...and by this guy's own admission he has been in industry....he gave no argument either just appealed to his own authority by baselessly saying they didn't know what they are talking about...based on because he says so.... A paid shill at best, malignant narcissist at worst Imagine if a plumber came round your house and you started telling them how to do their job because they didn't know what they were talking about because you knew better because.....you worked in an unrelated industry....I mean come on....
@@sgtbrown4273are you really an engineer? Just looking at the latest IEA and LAZARD which this 'scientist' quotes and nuclear is no where near the cheapest as he 'claimed' it's actually the single most expensive. So he's just a flat out liar...surely an engineer in a relevant field who passed would know this???!
Another fact these fuels are not made from fossils, the Earth makes oil and gas continuously, calling it fossil implied finite and pushed the prices right up in the early days when they were not worth tuppence
@@sgtbrown4273 I have A-levels in Physics, Chemist and Maths, and a physics degree, and was a qualified engineer with 40 years experience, so I am not in need of two elementary science classes, thank you. You are need of some common sense. Why do you think you know more that most climate scientists and indeed most scientists in general. Are you a lathe operator; they often think they are engineers?
They are also against hydrogen energy which I can make in my back yard to power my car (with modified injectors). It exhausts HO2, water. Japan is producing hydrogen run cars. Japan also used Ivermectin to combat covid very effectively. So, you do not have to plug in for hours using electricity 85% produced from coal. Oh, and China owns 80% of global pollution.
I would love to know how these protesters get to and from the locations where they protest….. Car? Bus? Train? I bet it’s not bloody walking!!!!! How do they get their shopping? Drop their kids at school? Visit parents, friends or relations? all the things that they F@#£ UP for other people…. Do they use fossil fuels? Every day of their lives they do… double standard hypocrites, every bloody one of them.
Wait, hold up! You don't get to ask "have you published any papers?" and then don't have the question turned back on you. _Has this fool activist published any papers?_
He's talking nonesense. There is enough capacity in the national grid even if everyone transitioned to using electric cars. In fact, right now the percentage of the capacity we're using is well below that of a few decades ago. And the more people have solar panels and wind turbines on their houses, the more that's gonna reduce as well. Furthermore the vast majority of electric cars get charged overnight when nobody is using electricity anyway, so it's really not going to be a burden on the grid at all. I don't know what nonesense he was saying about digging up transformers in back gardens. Finally, you can quite comfortably power every country in Europe with about a thousand square miles of solar panels in the Sahara desert. So I don't know the nonesense he was talking about running out of renewable energy. It's just not true. What kind of physicist is he? He must have got some significant investment in the fossil fuel industries
There are actually loads like him. The ambassadors of science and many other scientists and proffesionals are requesting and open debtae with the man made climate change scientists, who refuse to accept.
Does anyone know where this "hottest" June day ever (since the last one) was actually recorded? I've yet to hear any facts about this claim , just anecdotal bolox.
Its embarrassing and hard to watch someone like Sean even try to have a debate with someone who has spent a considerable amount of there life studying and working in a field and gained knowledge and facts to the best of there ability.
No, I highly have to disagree on that. They want to live in a world where they have to grow their own food by hand in the fields with lots of physical laybor. No electricity, transportation, medicine or grocery stores etc.. Just make them live in their dream world!
@@uwejacobs6587 Well, we both know that is never going to happen... :) Behavioral science tells us that just like training an animal, you "ignore to extinguish" bad behaviors.
@@Mr_OoOsH 4.2 V8? I bet that makes a sound to warm the cockles of any petrol heads heart, poetry in motion! If I had the money I'd have a TVR Sagaris. I know the build quality is a bit "meh" but those looks, and the sound of it....yum, yum! As for dealing with the swivel eyed loons known as JSO I would favour a VERY large steam roller.
We are still in the holocene and our temps should match the others. Its just that our holocene isnt lasting as long as the others did. We will be coming into a cold period soon enough when enough polar ice has melted. But im far more concerned about the magnetic pole shift which is picking up speed.
@@richardgutermuth2043Yup, and it was all “Game over” by 2000…..and yet….here we are and nothing has changed! Well at least the climate nutbags made “Prince” famous…”🎶 two thousand zero zero its party over were out of time…..so tonite im gonna party like its 1999🎶” 🤣😂🤣😂
@@paulrichards6894 Thats what happens when you actually put someone with knowledge against these clowns - something you will never see on the BBC. Thats why Greta got to spout here utter garbage without question because its so easily debunked.
This kids argument is basically "I WANT ICE CREAM NOWWWWWWWW". These people are demented, it's that simple and we shouldn't be entertaining them, they should be treated the same as flat-earthers.
@@backfromcuba Ice core samples completely destroy the climate change scam, it's why you pedos ignore it. C02 is plant food and at the lowest levels ever.
They're a Marxist outfit...the kind of people who would close your bank account (and your family's) if you show any dissent if they had the power. Gulags awaiting new customers! 🙂
This has to be one of the biggest, most awesome, slap-down arguments of the climate change narrative I think I have ever seen! This activist thought he could throw a trite, cliched narrative at the physicist who basically didn't just refute it, he completely decimated every single point with surgical precision! There was only one option left to the activist but thankfully he didn't resort to shouting and screaming. Or crying.
I completely agree . And then I'm sure that every eco/ climate activist has a cell phone, a washing machine , a PC , most of them have a car or a moto or the use public transportation ... their speech is full of pathos and their behaviour is simply patethic
@@chadleywinnetsya imagine being so gullible and dumb that you think humans are responsible for the climate and must sacrifice basic needs and animals so government can "fix it" while also having no solution to replacing what you want removed.
Utter balderdash. Brian Catt is not an expert on climate change. He is not trained as a climate scientist and has never had a scientific paper about the issue published in a scientific journal. He has an upper second class Bachelor’s degree in Physics and a Master’s degree in Business Administration. It also indicates he is a Chartered Engineer and a Chartered Physicist (which is awarded by the Institute of Physics, an organisation that accepts the overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic climate change), but his CV does not list any formal experience or qualifications in climate science since he started his career in 1965. What Catt lacks in credentials he tries to make up for with strong opinions about climate change, a combination that apparently makes him an ideal interviewee for GB News and Talk TV.
Yep if you’re gonna undermine someone at least come prepared and do your research on the person before the debate. I wouldn’t be surprised if Just Stop kick this guy out, they act like a cult anyway
This older gentleman is an absolute gem. If only more people had something between their ears, this world would be so much better place. But as the saying goes, empty barrels make the loudest noise. And another saying, well, a meme rather, "the problem with this world is that wise people are full of doubt, and dumbasses are full of confidence."
How do Stop Oil Activists get to protest sites? Do they go by car, bus, train or aircraft? Whatever method they are surely hypocrites as each method uses oil in some form, or are they exempt?.
If polled I suspect they all support unlimited immigration. No matter what country (1). Which logically increases the total energy usage. Plus puts extra strain on the water and waste services. Plus increases total food denands. Including distribution systems. 1) I live in the US and l am surprised we haven't seen our own home grown nutters doing this. But then they have other causes of the month or year to get excited about.
Do you think Sean has many mates, or is he widely despised 😂 And to go on TV and basically embarrass yourself by showing us you know sweet FA what a joke. It's good that GB News has gone the extra mile and got someone to close him down.
This is a classic media situation. They bring on a highly qualified scientist, who has worked all his long life in the energy industry, and published his first peer reviewed paper in the 1960’s. He debates with a very young man, who has no qualifications, doesn’t have a job, and makes random unsubstantiated claims, but they get equal billing. Stupidity personified!
Please make Prof. Catt a regular contributor, nothing but glorious facts! Maybe the courts should sentence these protestors to being schooled by Prof. Catt! ❤🎉😃
He isn't a Professor. His facts were mostly wrong or misleading. He is a strong supporter and member of "The Global Warming Policy Foundation" an organisation founded by Nigel Lawson, right-wing Tory, Chancellor under Margaret Thatcher. IT DOES NOT REVEAL ITS FUNDING SOURCES! I wonder which fossil fuel lobbyists provide the money!
I love this chap, talking sense to an idealogue. The more we allow sensible people to confront these people with facts, the more their position will be exposed.
I love watching ignorant upstarts with little or no credibility put in their place by someone much more intelligent than they can ever dream of being. Well done Brian, respect to you.
"ignorant upstarts with little or no credibility" - indeed, but why do these blighters have the ear of so many in positions of power, and influence of the decision-makers - it beggars belief! It is as though the medical profession were being asked to defer to witch-doctors.
@@MisterHowzat ... if they had even an average IQ they should be able to work out how ridiculous their claims are ... they live in a ideological fantasy world
@@MisterHowzat Science isn't determined by polling. At one time 99% of scientists believed the sun rotated around the earth and the earth was flat. Also that poll just asked them if they believed in climate change nothing about anthropogenic global warming.
@@PHUCKyoutube689 You need to read all the comments above to get the flow of the logical progression. I was referring to the alarmists, that THEY, not I, would point out that 97% of scientists agree. I was being sarcastic, making my case against the alarmists.
THERE IS NOTHING TO REPLACE OIL AND NATURAL GAS! I love this guy, he is 100% correct BE GLAD WE ARE NOT IN A GLOBAL COOLING THAT WOULD DEVASTATE HUMANITY
@@regenenwe have hundreds of years worth of oil for the whole planet, the day we run out of oil we would already have made the switch to using more nuclear
@@President_NotSureI encourage you to be the first of the 8 billion to help towards depopulation. Just stop using all energy resources and food that comes from it.... duhhhhh
This lot thinks their case becomes stronger when they and all their logic is detached from reality. They don't realise it just makes them look that much more stupid, unwise, and ill-prepared for real life.
Your pigeon analogy is excellent but incomplete, when you play chess with a pigeon he will knock all the pieces over, shit all over the board and then claim victory. You missed out the all important shit part.
When a child "demands" chocolate because the world will end if it doesn't get any chocolate you just tell them NO. When they have a tantrum and run around in the road you pick them up and put them in "time out". Can we start treating these children as children should be treated please and stop treating them like logical / reasonable adults?
Something the activists completely ignore is turning off the oil spigot without a replacement would cause a world-wide famine. The level of suffering would be immeasurable.
Absolutely correct they talk about Tipping points, stoping extraction of oil before we have real world solutions to power the world would be a un-recoverable Tipping Point.
yeah, farmers should be making sure their vehicles can run on vegetable oils etc. Only half of humanity's food gets caught and foraged in the wild these days.
That kid is deluded, clearly all he knows is the rhetoric he is fed. He has NO real world experience and he really enjoys playing eco-warrior. I especially enjoy how he immediately resorts to name calling and belittling of his conversational opponent.
A climate skeptic who represents the less than 1% of scientists who deny climate change. Finding someone like this to shill to an audience of gullible, ignorant fools is called confirmation bias.
@@dam8087 There are a foolish few people that totally deny climate change, it does change obviously as it always has but, I have never heard a scientist outright deny that change.I have heard 3% of the Worlds scientists shilling to an audience of gullible,ignorant fool's with confirmation bias that humans are the primary cause of that change while ignoring the fact that there was little human industrial activity when the weather was doing the same as it is now.
Will someone please explain how we in the uk can make even the slightest difference when China and India, with their vast populations and being used as the worlds workshops, are pumping way more than we are. Oh and what will we all wear? Always makes me smile when the activists wear plastic clothing.
The only 'crisis' is the one being self inflicted by the Western governments. None of this has anything to do with ' saving the planet ' The planet will do nicely on its own 😁
Your dead right. Every day it’s all about the effects but never analytics on the data and the science, just emotive nonsense.. It time to fight back before they destroy too much..
Those of us that have spent many decades in the energy industry don’t need to have published papers as we are no longer academics. (I moved out of academia 35 years ago) But we have the industry and technical knowledge and vast experience and can confirm this chap was entirely correct in all he said.
@@adriansmith5241 While the company you work for might have a bias ( most do), what you actually see as a worker, looking at the actual data, may be very different. Even if they cant say it without losing their job, many who work ( actually work), in such places are very aware their company is not promoting reality.
What they do is say “since records began” which only goes back generally to the 1800s where global average temps could start to be recorded so it’s a massive play on words to fit their narrative.
The first time I’ve seen Sean gob smacked! Really enjoyed this interview..no giggling, smirking, scoffing, talking over or swearing from the activist. What joy! His desperate swipe that Brian was the only one against the IPCC was pitiful. If we all change to electric cars Stop Oil can walk as slowly as they like as most cars will be queuing hours to recharge so they will have the road to themselves! And it was Nick Clegg who put a stop on developing nuclear power when they were in a coalition with the Tories. I think he said it wouldn’t be ready until 2021! 🥱🤭. No forward thinking!
I like her, she started on the activits side of the argument, went to neutral then went to the opposing side. She framed all 3 angles and then let them attack the argument. This was really good stuff.
The IPCC are just another undemocratic NGO ( lackies of the biggest NGO, the UN. Their publications are NOT by scientists but are their interpretation of what some scientists say.
IPCC panel has 75% climate activists with no scientific qualifications relevant to climate. They are mostly mathematicians and psychologists. UN is similarly totally in awe of climate change. If you read in depth about climate change only about 18% of scientists are wholly in favour of this hysterical view regarding climate change and CO2, the vast majority are neither on one side or the other and have serious doubts. It was interesting to read that in a survey of scientists by IPCC it removed all those who expressed the view totally against climate change and included those that were undecided as a for vote. hence the fallacy that 97% of scientists agree with climate change. As someone else said, 97% is not a consensus it is dogma.
@@Goldenlion148 the scientific consensus is not 97%, it's 100%. Scientists round the world check each other's papers like the rest of us would spend our 'me time' keeping our wits sharp with a strategy game or a cross word. There's no good news, the 3% turned out to have one or more of the same few errors that became well known and easily spotted. As for the rest of what you've said, the IPCC is very big, it needs statisticians to correlate it. If psychologists are qualified statisticians then that's all well and good, the old school like Freud and Jung were too anecdotal and gave clients no protection against pseudo science with a lower recovery rate than no therapy at all. Your self-qualifying 'if you read in depth' cliché did make me laugh; it doesn't qualify a statistic and it was a prelude to a preposterous lie so I'm grateful for that even though your lies disgust me. It's a classic.
Yep, then we could talk about the minerals used in ev cars, lithium batteries, solar panels, what wind turbines are made of - you can look at the entire process of 'green energy' and see what a joke it is but these people aren't told that and they are too stupid or ignorant to bother researching it.
@@Leeds71agreed, friend. To evaluate if it's good or bad for the planet you need all of the facts. I'm fed up of these do gooders not taking the time to do due diligence research.
@@michealmccannnot coal exactly it's coke and if you make every vehicle out of lithium ion battery do you know how much fresh and pure water is needed.if they really want to decrease CO2 emissions on planet only way to increase O2 levels is by maintaining Ocean's clean and healthy
Nice to know that you know more about it than most of the thousands of climate scientists in the world. Good for you! You must be very smart and well-informed.
@@edeledeledel5490Thousands of climate scientists? Gretha Tumberg? Just think for a second, all of these climate scientists.... Who funds them? Any vested interest in certain results? Bare in mind most of what you hear is from MSM reporting on global elites who have paid a group of Scientists make a report. These reports are never the same except for the fact we always have 5 to 10 years "left". There ate many Scientists whom haven't sold themselves and when they want to report, they get silenced. For example I bet you didn't know the Polar ice caps are growing not shrinking. Growing in the West, shrinking in the East but a net growth over all as the growth is bigger than the loss. Discovered recently but the elites don't seem keen to make it public knowledge. Had it have been shrinking, front page news everywhere for weeks, I'm sure. Place where temperatures are recorded (which is used to build computer models) are cherry picked. Some places on Earth are heating, others are cooling. Guess which are used. A scientist recently published his 20 years work recording temperatures across the globe using satellite. This meant he recorded everything, not just the parts he thought would yield the results he wanted. He found the Earth is warming up on the whole, but not at the rates we are being told they are. He published the work on his website and the website was blocked on Google for inaccurate climate science. 20 years. Satellites. Inaccurate lol. Anyway I'm rambling now, it's late and if my grammar is a mess I apologise but you should look this stuff up rather than just being told "Scientists say..."
@@edeledeledel5490~ Okay then, please list the names of every single one of these so-called "majority of scientists" you speak of and who exactly they all work for. I'll be waiting thx. 🇨🇦
Jordan Peterson has forever changed how I view these types of interactions: there's the scientist - a person in the world actively working on the problems of society - and then there's the activist who does nothing to improve the world in real terms; and this interaction is a perfect example of that. (The cheek, questioning the professors credentials!)
Precisely. What credentials did the activist have, how many papers has he published on anything. Does he even have a degree, if he does I bet it is on golf managment or social sciences.
Jordan Peterson has fuddled your brain then cos this guy isn't working on the problem. He's a shill. The very reports he quoted don't say nuclear is the cheapest, neither do ANY levelised cost of energy report. They infact say it's one of the most expensive. The same reports say renewables are the cheapest and even with storage many well he the cheapest on 10 years. There is a reason renewable growth is explosively exponential and nuclear has had no growth for decades.
@@Goldenlion148I have a masters in astrophysics and have never published a climate change paper. So why don't I just start spouting off shit that isn't true? Being a real scientist means listening to the people who have spent their lives researching it. You all just say theyre backed by whatever shadow industry but if you could actually understand the data you would know that it's real.
To be fair, that last point about questioning the scientist is wrong. Just because someone is a scientist it doesn't prevent them from being questioned. If I said something controversial or questionable in my field, I'd want someone to ask me to justify myself, fellow scientist or not. Don't take everything you hear at face value.
I love Nana's work as a host - very calm and even-handed, asking sensible questions, and allowing the interviewees to explain their positions. And in the case of the activist, spout a whole lot of well-rehearsed cliches, whether they're true or not. Brian Catt was all over it - well done.
Aye, if they are going to preach and dictate to us "climate deniers", perhaps they should lead the way and stup using anything in society that is oil derived in any way shape or form...be fun to see how far they get.
@@TOM-TOM-TOM I suppose if people agree with the death cult, that would also be confirmation bias. I generally go for the side that wants to debate and offers facts and solutions. Did the UN say climate emergency is real. I've watched the UN deal with emergencies for decades. It usually involves them sitting with their thumbs up their arses and filling in their expenses while wars, famines or virus outbreaks rage all around them
The BBC will not under any circumstances tolerate any kind of debate on climate change. Catastrophic effect of climate change is a given and BBC push this mantra daily. BBC recently put out a programme on climate change on their schools section which actually told of 3 benefits regarding CO2 emission. The climate change zealots went ballistic and the BBC quickly removed it.
It’s like listening to a child try to debate against a world renowned expert. JSO we’re having a laugh when they sent that Sean up to try and debate. He got utterly destroyed
As a disabled person last winter was horrific for me. Scared to put on the heating and paying bills. My son came to visit and he was horrified by the cold He took over the responsibility to pay the winter bills put on the heating and filled my fridge with food. I am so lucky to have a son who could step in. So many others are not is the same position as me.
As a working person with a family it was horrific for me.Paying a mortgage no help from the government for my bills and Bank of England base rate going up and no free car.It’s hard for everyone especially those who work and have to worry about not losing their job.
@@muckspreader1ableYou're lucky you can work. Disabled people can't. When you become disabled, I suspect you'll expect help from the national insurance you've paid.
After the coldest spring I can recall in 70 odd years (NE US) I told my wife that the eco-tards would wait for the first hot day in July to start screaming "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!"
"Hottest recorded temperatures" means nothing because we started recording weather phenomena only in 1880. That wee 143 years is a flashbulb moment in Earth's 4.5 billion years.
The glasses, the wear glasses, the jewelry, the cloths, the watch, the bracelets, literally everything we are watching in this video comes directly or indirectly from oil. And if you go check the temperatures and co2 in the Middle Ages, you will see that it was hotter and the co2 levels were higher and there were no cars, no industry and the population was significantly lower than today.
Meanwhile nobody is reporting they are backtracking on their hottest day ever recorded nonsense. We have a heat warning in place today where I live. It's supposed to be 26C. Pure fearmongering.
He’s not a climate scientist though is he. His chemical engineering degree is 50 years old and nothing suggests he has ever worked in the sector. Don’t be fooled
@@paulharrison2325 he did publish in the field, and you can't publish anything of value if you haven't been in the field. He's already answered for his qualifications. And just cuz someone had a degree 50yrs ago, doesn't mean he's unqualified, unless you're 12 and haven't worked a day in your life
Quite. A fifty year old qualification is far less relevant than how the graduate spent the fifty years hence. This fellow remained within his chosen field and has undoubtedly discovered and achieved far more in that time than he did during his initial student years.
When he says "we need to immediately invest", he's not talking about the free market. He's talking about ponying up tax payer dollars to fund this idiocy. If renewables were cheaper, companies would already be investing significant dollars in their development. The fact that this isn't happening on any large scale is all the proof you need that the free market has indeed spoken on the matter and done so very resoundingly.
Hooray! A scientist that knows what they're talking about, from inter glacial periods to the amount of time it takes to build a nuclear power plant, that's not afraid to tell it like it is! Hooray to Brian Catt!!!
He says he knows what he is talking about, but so does the other guy. So are you going to do any actual peer reviewed researched or just agree with whatever video aligns with your point?
Brian Catt is not an expert. He has written no papers on this subject. He has a high second class degree in physics but has no formal education in climate related science. You seem to want him to be right.
@@stephenconway2468 Is the nonce looking one on the right an expert? Please list his papers on the subject and details of his formal education in climate related science. You seem to want him to be right.
What papers has the activist published? What is his education level? What makes him think that he is able to debate this issue? NOTHING - except his arrogance!
It sounds like Shawn is nothing more than a megaphone for the two groups he sited. He seems he isn't willing to do his own research to discover whether what he believes is true or not.
Major media here in the US are making a big deal of the recent100F plus temperatures in Phoenix AZ. Of course, they blame it on climate change. Fact is Phoenix has always had 100F plus temperatures during the summer. When I was 18 and lifeguarding at a public pool in the Phoenix area, it was 117F the entire week. So the panic talk by the lame stream media of 110F going on now is ridiculous.
Exactly, gbnews failing to do their job and get a balanced debate. Awful tabloid rubbish.
Indeed, I'd love that question bounced back at the childish numpty.
A Salary
And IGNORANCE!
That man published papers before this activist was born 😂😂😂. Brian is old, but gold!
Mr Catt is not an expert on climate change. He is not trained as a climate scientist and has never had a scientific paper about the issue published in a scientific journal.
Yes it crediable and working in the industry is also.
Yep, ancient Egypt may have been warmer than Britain 2023 on average, literally due to latitude, but as the global average as a whole it's not possible to have been as hot as today at the time. No way in hell.
@@lyrimetacurl0he literally said it was up to 2°C warmer at the time in the UK than it is now.
He has never published any papers. He's just an ignorant climate science denier.
Here's Brian a Nuclear physicist and engineer for 40 years and here's Shaun who left university with a degree in gender studies and never had a job.
Who do you believe 🤔
Yeh, but has the scientist even published any scientific papers? Huh!?
These kids are an embarrassment.
@@MajesticArtimus
I think his wife's boyfriend is too!
Brilliant! 😂
I believe the engineers who threaten to resign when Brian tries to speak for their organizations. Deniers will want to keep that quiet so their suckers can blame censorship of him on the lizard people, when they're not too busy blaming wildfires on the space antifa space lasers from outer space.
Brian
This, ladies and gentlemen is the grown up result of saying "yes" to your child too many times
I like how the scientist referred to actual data and reasoning while the activist referred to authority
also he was saying (activist) : most of the scientists .
bruh nice source what sort of scientist would be as dumb as that lol
@@kalashydra9016 "most of the scientists" is an appeal to authority. Also he's referring to the IPCC which is a political organisation. These activists don't understand science, they just repeat the dogma that everyone agrees with them, without actually looking at the data.
@@rutgerhoutdijk3547 exactly thats what i mean hes full of shit lol . lyterali no source to his claims
There needs to be another Munk type debate on climate alarmism.
These alarmists are creating an alternative pseudo 'scientific ' world to make their case.
This needs to be debunked in a public forum.
@@deryk2002au exactly this. One can't help but assume that the choice of opponent for Catt in this case was chosen for the sake of ratings and red hot television rather than to further a genuine scientific understanding of facts.
The painful exasperation on Brian’s face when listening to the deranged nonsense from Just Stop Oil says it all
What did the JSO bloke say, specifically, that was "deranged nonsense"?
Pick one of his points and argue against it factually.
@@andyknowles772 He didn't actually say anything besides appeal for authority. His strongest argument: "Do you disagree with IPCC and with X million scientists? How dare you?" He knows nothing about the subject, he has no plan to propose except some nonsense that won't work but talking about it makes him feel better, and that is really what JSO is all about
@@utility00 yes and it's ok to appeal to authority....what the 'scientist' did was even worse....
Oh the IEA, ISPCC, climate scientists....I quote...they don't know what they are talking about...and by this guy's own admission he has been in industry....he gave no argument either just appealed to his own authority by baselessly saying they didn't know what they are talking about...based on because he says so....
A paid shill at best, malignant narcissist at worst
Imagine if a plumber came round your house and you started telling them how to do their job because they didn't know what they were talking about because you knew better because.....you worked in an unrelated industry....I mean come on....
@@andyknowles772 I think it's deranged to be so fanatical about a subject where you only can rely on other people's opinions. It's like a cult.
Ironically Shell invests more in renewable energy than the UK does.
The eco activist did not provide a single fact in here. The nuclear physicist actually told facts, history and how things work. 👍👍
No. he didn't! He just made unfounded claims and waffled on. You're a scientist are you?
@@edeledeledel5490 no i'm an engineer and your in need of a elementary elementary science class. this time PASS!!!!!!!!
@@sgtbrown4273are you really an engineer? Just looking at the latest IEA and LAZARD which this 'scientist' quotes and nuclear is no where near the cheapest as he 'claimed' it's actually the single most expensive. So he's just a flat out liar...surely an engineer in a relevant field who passed would know this???!
Another fact these fuels are not made from fossils, the Earth makes oil and gas continuously, calling it fossil implied finite and pushed the prices right up in the early days when they were not worth tuppence
@@sgtbrown4273 I have A-levels in Physics, Chemist and Maths, and a physics degree, and was a qualified engineer with 40 years experience, so I am not in need of two elementary science classes, thank you. You are need of some common sense. Why do you think you know more that most climate scientists and indeed most scientists in general. Are you a lathe operator; they often think they are engineers?
My God these activists are so gleefully arrogant and lacking self awareness !
They are also against hydrogen energy which I can make in my back yard to power my car (with modified injectors). It exhausts HO2, water. Japan is producing hydrogen run cars. Japan also used Ivermectin to combat covid very effectively. So, you do not have to plug in for hours using electricity 85% produced from coal. Oh, and China owns 80% of global pollution.
The globe was categorically NOT warmer during that time. 🤷♀️
The globe WAS categorically warmer during that time 🤷♀️
This was a bit like watching a knowledgeable, intelligent person talking to an Irish root vegetable
😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah, but at least potatoes know how to SHUT UP.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Now that's an insult to potatoes
Underrates comment
Sean is a prime example of what happens when you prevent a child playing out with their friends. Parents be warned !!
Probably wasn’t breast fed I think.
Why are ALL of these "protestors" so odd and geeky looking?? I think they're just angry and jealous.
@@slartybartfast5368 He was, by his father.
I would love to know how these protesters get to and from the locations where they protest….. Car? Bus? Train? I bet it’s not bloody walking!!!!! How do they get their shopping? Drop their kids at school? Visit parents, friends or relations? all the things that they F@#£ UP for other people…. Do they use fossil fuels? Every day of their lives they do… double standard hypocrites, every bloody one of them.
Prime example of vegetarianism too.
Such a little weed. Get outside and get some work done boy.
Probably a vegan. They lack the nutrition for physical work.
Not an ounce of muscle on the guy
Bet his nickname is “soft hands”
He doesn't have to as daddy pays for everything.
Lose the beard and see his chin is the back of his head!
This chap was a breath of fresh air,and obviously knew what he was talking about,thank you sir.
Wait, hold up! You don't get to ask "have you published any papers?" and then don't have the question turned back on you. _Has this fool activist published any papers?_
Yes his benefit claims forms, 😂 which will be paid for by taxes gained from those using fossil fuels. Just stop oil are HYPOCRITES .
He's more than likely on benefits.
no but i bet he reads the guardian
He printed off a few propaganda leaflets on his gaming p.c. , does that count ?
There he said it , " It's all made in models , not real " !!
Jeez , thank God Ferguson isn't doing the modelling , we'd all be fried by Tuesday ??
This physicist is great guy and a breath of fresh air. We need him and more like him involved in these debates.
"...a breath of fresh air." Well, THAT would be a welcome situation, Pete.
Why are you listening to a physicist handpicked by GB news over the thousands and thousands of climate scientists contradicting this guy?
He's talking nonesense. There is enough capacity in the national grid even if everyone transitioned to using electric cars. In fact, right now the percentage of the capacity we're using is well below that of a few decades ago. And the more people have solar panels and wind turbines on their houses, the more that's gonna reduce as well.
Furthermore the vast majority of electric cars get charged overnight when nobody is using electricity anyway, so it's really not going to be a burden on the grid at all. I don't know what nonesense he was saying about digging up transformers in back gardens.
Finally, you can quite comfortably power every country in Europe with about a thousand square miles of solar panels in the Sahara desert. So I don't know the nonesense he was talking about running out of renewable energy. It's just not true. What kind of physicist is he? He must have got some significant investment in the fossil fuel industries
There are actually loads like him. The ambassadors of science and many other scientists and proffesionals are requesting and open debtae with the man made climate change scientists, who refuse to accept.
@@marioluigi9599 Thank goodness....a sensible comment...where do all the idiots come from?....hope they haven't got kids.......
As usual JSO comes ill prepared with so called facts that prove to be inaccurate and misguided .
They are a cult. Their mantra, which they repeat incessantly, is their entire preparation.
You can't teach pork!
Does anyone know where this "hottest" June day ever (since the last one) was actually recorded? I've yet to hear any facts about this claim , just anecdotal bolox.
This knob head has already been publicly kneecapped .. totally unprepared with no evidence or facts... 😂
No one has ever said `no` to these self entitled idiots.A good slap needed.
Its embarrassing and hard to watch someone like Sean even try to have a debate with someone who has spent a considerable amount of there life studying and working in a field and gained knowledge and facts to the best of there ability.
‘Their’
Spell check you maron...
@@sicilianotoronto
"We Are Demanding...". The proper response to childish demands is to ignore them.
Almost the correct way is to withhold their allowance and make them get a job and learn some responsibility
No, I highly have to disagree on that. They want to live in a world where they have to grow their own food by hand in the fields with lots of physical laybor. No electricity, transportation, medicine or grocery stores etc.. Just make them live in their dream world!
@@uwejacobs6587 Well, we both know that is never going to happen... :) Behavioral science tells us that just like training an animal, you "ignore to extinguish" bad behaviors.
He advocates for more slavery in Africa to make new batteries for Europeans.
@@uwejacobs6587Did you see the arms on the activist? He’d struggle to open a bag of Doritos!
Every time I hear about a Just Stop Oil protest, I take my car out for a ride!
I daily a 4.2 V8 and my weekend toy does gallons per mile….I’m doing my bit 🤣
Me too (sorry shouldn't use that term). Me as well, and I make sure I waste as much petrol as possible rev'ing the nuts off it along the way.
Make sure to b careful if u "accidentally" run them over. Lol 🤣🤣😆😆
@@Mr_OoOsH 4.2 V8? I bet that makes a sound to warm the cockles of any petrol heads heart, poetry in motion! If I had the money I'd have a TVR Sagaris. I know the build quality is a bit "meh" but those looks, and the sound of it....yum, yum! As for dealing with the swivel eyed loons known as JSO I would favour a VERY large steam roller.
@@witsend236that’s not wasting, that’s enjoying it. I regularly do that with my GT4.
Absolutely excellent, someone at last shuts down these bloody idiots with facts
A GB News viewer talking about facts is hilarious
@@dam8087cope harder
@@owendavies9141science denial is some sad shit boy
@@dam8087 Ignoring what the WEF,UN and WHO are aiming to do is much sadder.
@@dam8087 you should know! Off you pop now muffin
Even when just stop oil tries to sound intellectual, they made a fool of themselves 😮
Recorded. We are coming out of one of the coolest periods in history. Most of these activists are misguided fools
Called useful idiots
We are still in the holocene and our temps should match the others. Its just that our holocene isnt lasting as long as the others did. We will be coming into a cold period soon enough when enough polar ice has melted. But im far more concerned about the magnetic pole shift which is picking up speed.
You misspelled most it is a l l
During the 70's and early 80's they were warning us about a new ice age
@@richardgutermuth2043Yup, and it was all “Game over” by 2000…..and yet….here we are and nothing has changed! Well at least the climate nutbags made “Prince” famous…”🎶 two thousand zero zero its party over were out of time…..so tonite im gonna party like its 1999🎶” 🤣😂🤣😂
Sean has just embarrassed himself once again 😂😂
And his sandle n socks family 🙄
Sean the sheep 🐑
Destroyed in minutes, loved it :-)
This activist just spouting stuff hes been told complete bull
he looks like a woman
the old guy battered him
@@paulrichards6894 Thats what happens when you actually put someone with knowledge against these clowns - something you will never see on the BBC. Thats why Greta got to spout here utter garbage without question because its so easily debunked.
A living example of the Dunning Kruger Effect!
Current state of majority of gen z: Impressionable and gullible. Also, a reflection of sorry state of our education indoctrination system.
This kids argument is basically "I WANT ICE CREAM NOWWWWWWWW". These people are demented, it's that simple and we shouldn't be entertaining them, they should be treated the same as flat-earthers.
And forced to live their days in caves especially now as I type this during severe winter weather.
The old guy has twice the amount of testosterone as the guy from Just Stop Oil.
soy boy lol
He probably identifies as a unicorn.
This old man is a breath of fresh air.
The scientist has a very strong argument, point and knowledge base. 👍
No he doesn't. His qualifications aren't relevant and he's wrong.
Google him, he's been debunked before.
@@backfromcuba Ice core samples completely destroy the climate change scam, it's why you pedos ignore it. C02 is plant food and at the lowest levels ever.
Catt is a charlatan. Now wonder he is on GB "News".
@@TOM-TOM-TOM Precisely.
@@backfromcubaby who?? Corrupt bought and paid for "fact checkers" or bought and paid for scientists??
It is impossible to make people understand their stupidity, for that requires understanding.
Je hebt gelijk, je reactie bewijst het maar weer.
@@regenen
Het is moeilijk voor een lege zak om rechtop te staan.
Just Stop Oil need to learn that you do not demand things in a democratic system.
SPOILT BRATT MUMMY and DADDY'S have never said NO TO SEAN EVER👍👍
They're a Marxist outfit...the kind of people who would close your bank account (and your family's) if you show any dissent if they had the power. Gulags awaiting new customers! 🙂
"democratic"
That would explain why there's no-one to vote for who DOESN'T support the green nonsense.
@terencegumbs2478 Now do government
Those who demand, don't get.
This has to be one of the biggest, most awesome, slap-down arguments of the climate change narrative I think I have ever seen! This activist thought he could throw a trite, cliched narrative at the physicist who basically didn't just refute it, he completely decimated every single point with surgical precision! There was only one option left to the activist but thankfully he didn't resort to shouting and screaming. Or crying.
He probably threw a tantrum on his way out. No doubt mummy will be there to soothe her little soldier.
Imagine being this gullible
I completely agree . And then I'm sure that every eco/ climate activist has a cell phone, a washing machine , a PC , most of them have a car or a moto or the use public transportation ... their speech is full of pathos and their behaviour is simply patethic
@@chadleywinnetsya imagine being so gullible and dumb that you think humans are responsible for the climate and must sacrifice basic needs and animals so government can "fix it" while also having no solution to replacing what you want removed.
Utter balderdash. Brian Catt is not an expert on climate change. He is not trained as a climate scientist and has never had a scientific paper about the issue published in a scientific journal. He has an upper second class Bachelor’s degree in Physics and a Master’s degree in Business Administration. It also indicates he is a Chartered Engineer and a Chartered Physicist (which is awarded by the Institute of Physics, an organisation that accepts the overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic climate change), but his CV does not list any formal experience or qualifications in climate science since he started his career in 1965. What Catt lacks in credentials he tries to make up for with strong opinions about climate change, a combination that apparently makes him an ideal interviewee for GB News and Talk TV.
Hilarious how Sean shot himself in the foot with ‘has he published any papers ‘ 😂🤣😂
Yep if you’re gonna undermine someone at least come prepared and do your research on the person before the debate. I wouldn’t be surprised if Just Stop kick this guy out, they act like a cult anyway
Bet he speaks it Sean aswel completely wrong, anybody who spells there name Sean rather than shaun can't be trusted. 😂
This older gentleman is an absolute gem. If only more people had something between their ears, this world would be so much better place. But as the saying goes, empty barrels make the loudest noise. And another saying, well, a meme rather, "the problem with this world is that wise people are full of doubt, and dumbasses are full of confidence."
How do Stop Oil Activists get to protest sites? Do they go by car, bus, train or aircraft? Whatever method they are surely hypocrites as each method uses oil in some form, or are they exempt?.
Do as they say not as they do ....😅
Their chauffeur drives them in mom and dad's McClaren
Perhaps they all travel to the protests on horse back🙄
@@janeboardman5289 but the horse farts ,will somebody do some thing about the horse farts ?🤣🤣🤣
If polled I suspect they all support unlimited immigration. No matter what country (1). Which logically increases the total energy usage. Plus puts extra strain on the water and waste services. Plus increases total food denands. Including distribution systems.
1) I live in the US and l am surprised we haven't seen our own home grown nutters doing this. But then they have other causes of the month or year to get excited about.
please get Brian back on the show maybe live, he was brilliant!
Scientist: Here are the facts and statistics.
Activists: But my mom disagress with you.
"The only difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits"
- Albert Einstein
😂😂
Do you think Sean has many mates, or is he widely despised 😂 And to go on TV and basically embarrass yourself by showing us you know sweet FA what a joke. It's good that GB News has gone the extra mile and got someone to close him down.
As Leo Kearse says it’s all just a scam because they think they might get lucky with a hippy chick sometime….
physiogamy never lies
@@oldboyengineer9794 or toothpick arms due to a vegan diet.
Hes quite happy in his echo chamber
Who'd have thought a skinny ginger and glasses would be a whiner... what a catch ladies....
This is a classic media situation. They bring on a highly qualified scientist, who has worked all his long life in the energy industry, and published his first peer reviewed paper in the 1960’s. He debates with a very young man, who has no qualifications, doesn’t have a job, and makes random unsubstantiated claims, but they get equal billing. Stupidity personified!
Please make Prof. Catt a regular contributor, nothing but glorious facts! Maybe the courts should sentence these protestors to being schooled by Prof. Catt! ❤🎉😃
What a great idea.Put Judith Curry in the mix too!
Sterilise them all
He isn't a Professor. His facts were mostly wrong or misleading. He is a strong supporter and member of "The Global Warming Policy Foundation" an organisation founded by Nigel Lawson, right-wing Tory, Chancellor under Margaret Thatcher. IT DOES NOT REVEAL ITS FUNDING SOURCES! I wonder which fossil fuel lobbyists provide the money!
What about compulsory Prof Catt videos in every school in Britain to even up the brain washing that our children are suffering from every day.
I love this chap, talking sense to an idealogue. The more we allow sensible people to confront these people with facts, the more their position will be exposed.
I love watching ignorant upstarts with little or no credibility put in their place by someone much more intelligent than they can ever dream of being. Well done Brian, respect to you.
"ignorant upstarts with little or no credibility" - indeed, but why do these blighters have the ear of so many in positions of power, and influence of the decision-makers - it beggars belief! It is as though the medical profession were being asked to defer to witch-doctors.
Brian didn't even have to change out of first gear to show this twerp up.
yes
Brian has a nuclear power plant for a brain while the activist is running a 9 volt battery.
9 volt is a bit generous.
That's dropped to 8.5 volts.
dynamo i reckon. using a hamster....
How about a solar panel on a rainy day in October?
Love this
These climate alarmists are INSANE
Or brainwashed. Just like many others who do not protest.
@@MisterHowzat ... if they had even an average IQ they should be able to work out how ridiculous their claims are ... they live in a ideological fantasy world
@@pablorages1241 And then they'd point out that "97% of scientists agree that...."
@@MisterHowzat Science isn't determined by polling. At one time 99% of scientists believed the sun rotated around the earth and the earth was flat. Also that poll just asked them if they believed in climate change nothing about anthropogenic global warming.
@@PHUCKyoutube689 You need to read all the comments above to get the flow of the logical progression. I was referring to the alarmists, that THEY, not I, would point out that 97% of scientists agree. I was being sarcastic, making my case against the alarmists.
THERE IS NOTHING TO REPLACE OIL AND NATURAL GAS!
I love this guy, he is 100% correct BE GLAD WE ARE NOT IN A GLOBAL COOLING THAT WOULD DEVASTATE HUMANITY
Solarpanels and windturbines + 🔋 bank... 😊
@@mikafiltenborg7572LOL! Whatta load of 🐂💩!
@@mikafiltenborg7572do you actually think this is an answer?
So you mean to tell us that at one point, when fossil fuels are depleted, we just devolve as a society and stop using electricity?
@@regenenwe have hundreds of years worth of oil for the whole planet, the day we run out of oil we would already have made the switch to using more nuclear
Just Stop Oil should be invited to a properly run televised debate - let them fall on their sword publicly.
These types never debate in good faith. They tantrum and refuse to acknowledge the people who oppose them
How do the Stop Oil muppets get to the location of there protests????? I bet they don’t walk.
Mo, enough of this fake junk science. These activists need to be slapped, gitmo, and exq2ted.
Yea but they would not let the the people who know get a word in they would be shouting over the people of knowledge
@@davidc9171 Then they would be forced to shut up and listen.
Brian Catt completely demolished the eco-clown.;
🤡 🎪 🛢
fry little piggy's fry
@@President_NotSureI encourage you to be the first of the 8 billion to help towards depopulation. Just stop using all energy resources and food that comes from it.... duhhhhh
@@President_NotSure What device to you use to resort to insults ?
What was used to manufacture it ... trees ? Haha
@@President_NotSure Gobshite
The biggest problem today is society has stopped listening to the wisdom of the 'real' experts
I only listen to experts that can be named
Brexiteers are the best example
Most scientists say we are in a climate crisis do you listen to them?
This lot thinks their case becomes stronger when they and all their logic is detached from reality. They don't realise it just makes them look that much more stupid, unwise, and ill-prepared for real life.
It is not the 'in thing' to listen to old white men anymore... just look at that plastic sunken submersible.
Oh dear, Sean's battleship was truly sunk 😂
Arguing with ‘just stop oil’ activists is like playing chess with a pigeon: the pigeon knocks the pieces over and struts around like it won.
Your pigeon analogy is excellent but incomplete, when you play chess with a pigeon he will knock all the pieces over, shit all over the board and then claim victory. You missed out the all important shit part.
@@keithwilliams1243😂😂😂 nice.
When a child "demands" chocolate because the world will end if it doesn't get any chocolate you just tell them NO. When they have a tantrum and run around in the road you pick them up and put them in "time out". Can we start treating these children as children should be treated please and stop treating them like logical / reasonable adults?
Yes please but where do we have a space big enough to put them in
Well said!!
Sure. But, only if we bring back caning for those children who refuse to listen or do as their told.
@@silverfang6869 The ocean, help the sharks and it's plenty big!
Something the activists completely ignore is turning off the oil spigot without a replacement would cause a world-wide famine. The level of suffering would be immeasurable.
Absolutely correct they talk about Tipping points, stoping extraction of oil before we have real world solutions to power the world would be a un-recoverable Tipping Point.
Would most likely result in the end of the world as we know it
I think they know, but they HATE humanity, and to them a couple of billion people starving to death is nothing.
The loss of plastics alone would have a devastating impact on civilisation worldwide.
yeah, farmers should be making sure their vehicles can run on vegetable oils etc. Only half of humanity's food gets caught and foraged in the wild these days.
That kid is deluded, clearly all he knows is the rhetoric he is fed. He has NO real world experience and he really enjoys playing eco-warrior. I especially enjoy how he immediately resorts to name calling and belittling of his conversational opponent.
Finally a scientist with the balls to tell the truth
Catt is a charlatan. He is clueless on climate science.
Watch how mainstream attack him now to discredit him.
A climate skeptic who represents the less than 1% of scientists who deny climate change. Finding someone like this to shill to an audience of gullible, ignorant fools is called confirmation bias.
@@dam8087 There are a foolish few people that totally deny climate change, it does change obviously as it always has but, I have never heard a scientist outright deny that change.I have heard 3% of the Worlds scientists shilling to an audience of gullible,ignorant fool's with confirmation bias that humans are the primary cause of that change while ignoring the fact that there was little human industrial activity when the weather was doing the same as it is now.
There are many, but from the beginning of this scam, they have been ignored and silenced by the charlatans who are making money out of this nonsense.
Will someone please explain how we in the uk can make even the slightest difference when China and India, with their vast populations and being used as the worlds workshops, are pumping way more than we are. Oh and what will we all wear? Always makes me smile when the activists wear plastic clothing.
The only 'crisis' is the one being self inflicted by the Western governments. None of this has anything to do with ' saving the planet ' The planet will do nicely on its own 😁
Thumbs up to the scientist - great to hear from someone who really does know what he's talking about , using plain common sense language
Sean suggests we should 'pull out' from these deals.
I bet his dad wished he had done the same.
Don’t you just love the physicist doing his notes as the others talk.
I love the fact that he used the word "bonkers"
He’s a busy man.
The funny part is the delusional trans host acted for a second like he was doing something weird. She pointed it out right before he started speaking.
Just stop oil have no credibility, just trying to make themselves relevant, fortunately the people see them as what they are, trumpets
Useful idiots for the WEF. Soros is probably paying him.
How many papers has that activist had published?
I was waiting for someone to ask him that, but they didn't
Really, it did not need to be asked. He looked stupid anyway.
Probably as many as Catt has, ie zero.
Err none!
@@wundurra24 Catt said he has published papers
Pure reasonable knowledge. The eggs think they are smarter than the chicken. Thank you, Brian, for your expertise.
Well done GB news for finally bringing actual scientists into these discussions. No other media outlets have fine do
Your dead right. Every day it’s all about the effects but never analytics on the data and the science, just emotive nonsense.. It time to fight back before they destroy too much..
Actual, unqualified, "scientists" who seem to make up random denials and misrepresent the observable facts. Yeah, great job there
Actual scientist?????....my hamster could do a better job.....
Those of us that have spent many decades in the energy industry don’t need to have published papers as we are no longer academics. (I moved out of academia 35 years ago) But we have the industry and technical knowledge and vast experience and can confirm this chap was entirely correct in all he said.
Company's are just as biased to there own agenda as people are so the only experience you get is that which benefits the company and there profits.
@@adriansmith5241 well to some extent yes. My company is making a fortune out of consultancy for net zero.
@@adriansmith5241 While the company you work for might have a bias ( most do), what you actually see as a worker, looking at the actual data, may be very different. Even if they cant say it without losing their job, many who work ( actually work), in such places are very aware their company is not promoting reality.
@@adriansmith5241 You don't have much credibility when you can't spell "companies" and "their".
Which chap is correct? Sean the Student zealot? Or Brian the Engineer?
“It was actually 2 degrees warmer in Roman and Egyptian times” 😂😂 at last, some reality to this ridiculousness
What they do is say “since records began” which only goes back generally to the 1800s where global average temps could start to be recorded so it’s a massive play on words to fit their narrative.
The first time I’ve seen Sean gob smacked! Really enjoyed this interview..no giggling, smirking, scoffing, talking over or swearing from the activist. What joy! His desperate swipe that Brian was the only one against the IPCC was pitiful. If we all change to electric cars Stop Oil can walk as slowly as they like as most cars will be queuing hours to recharge so they will have the road to themselves! And it was Nick Clegg who put a stop on developing nuclear power when they were in a coalition with the Tories. I think he said it wouldn’t be ready until 2021! 🥱🤭. No forward thinking!
I like her, she started on the activits side of the argument, went to neutral then went to the opposing side. She framed all 3 angles and then let them attack the argument. This was really good stuff.
Don't forget, she wanted people that were Covid unvaccinated to be locked up.
@@Kwistenbiebel200 She's the best.
Finally they let someone sane speak about IPCC corruption etc
The IPCC are just another undemocratic NGO ( lackies of the biggest NGO, the UN. Their publications are NOT by scientists but are their interpretation of what some scientists say.
IPCC panel has 75% climate activists with no scientific qualifications relevant to climate. They are mostly mathematicians and psychologists. UN is similarly totally in awe of climate change. If you read in depth about climate change only about 18% of scientists are wholly in favour of this hysterical view regarding climate change and CO2, the vast majority are neither on one side or the other and have serious doubts. It was interesting to read that in a survey of scientists by IPCC it removed all those who expressed the view totally against climate change and included those that were undecided as a for vote. hence the fallacy that 97% of scientists agree with climate change. As someone else said, 97% is not a consensus it is dogma.
@@Goldenlion148 the scientific consensus is not 97%, it's 100%. Scientists round the world check each other's papers like the rest of us would spend our 'me time' keeping our wits sharp with a strategy game or a cross word. There's no good news, the 3% turned out to have one or more of the same few errors that became well known and easily spotted. As for the rest of what you've said, the IPCC is very big, it needs statisticians to correlate it. If psychologists are qualified statisticians then that's all well and good, the old school like Freud and Jung were too anecdotal and gave clients no protection against pseudo science with a lower recovery rate than no therapy at all. Your self-qualifying 'if you read in depth' cliché did make me laugh; it doesn't qualify a statistic and it was a prelude to a preposterous lie so I'm grateful for that even though your lies disgust me. It's a classic.
Poor Sean realised 2 minutes in he’d turned up to a gun fight with a flick knife.
A butter knife 😂😂😂😂😂
Its an ideology, nothing more nothing less.
And a dangerous one
Cult
Yes JSO have all the hallmarks of a cult. Minions repeating the same emotional rhetoric and a creepy old man at the top, pulling the strings
@@jackdeniston59 .... am thinking you made a "typo" there Jack??? Just askin'!
Didn’t the UN drop net Zero and as for pylons what are they made off ? Answer steel, and how do they make steel 🙄
Yep, then we could talk about the minerals used in ev cars, lithium batteries, solar panels, what wind turbines are made of - you can look at the entire process of 'green energy' and see what a joke it is but these people aren't told that and they are too stupid or ignorant to bother researching it.
You cannot make steel without coal.
@@Leeds71agreed, friend. To evaluate if it's good or bad for the planet you need all of the facts. I'm fed up of these do gooders not taking the time to do due diligence research.
I suspect the UN dropped net Zero because they realised they could wipe out people even more efficiently by starting wars.
@@michealmccannnot coal exactly it's coke and if you make every vehicle out of lithium ion battery do you know how much fresh and pure water is needed.if they really want to decrease CO2 emissions on planet only way to increase O2 levels is by maintaining Ocean's clean and healthy
Absolutely right: THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS. Thank God someone is making sense.
Nice to know that you know more about it than most of the thousands of climate scientists in the world. Good for you! You must be very smart and well-informed.
@@edeledeledel5490 You lose your argument when you resort to invective.
@@edeledeledel5490Thousands of climate scientists? Gretha Tumberg?
Just think for a second, all of these climate scientists.... Who funds them? Any vested interest in certain results?
Bare in mind most of what you hear is from MSM reporting on global elites who have paid a group of Scientists make a report.
These reports are never the same except for the fact we always have 5 to 10 years "left".
There ate many Scientists whom haven't sold themselves and when they want to report, they get silenced.
For example I bet you didn't know the Polar ice caps are growing not shrinking. Growing in the West, shrinking in the East but a net growth over all as the growth is bigger than the loss. Discovered recently but the elites don't seem keen to make it public knowledge. Had it have been shrinking, front page news everywhere for weeks, I'm sure.
Place where temperatures are recorded (which is used to build computer models) are cherry picked. Some places on Earth are heating, others are cooling. Guess which are used. A scientist recently published his 20 years work recording temperatures across the globe using satellite. This meant he recorded everything, not just the parts he thought would yield the results he wanted.
He found the Earth is warming up on the whole, but not at the rates we are being told they are. He published the work on his website and the website was blocked on Google for inaccurate climate science. 20 years. Satellites. Inaccurate lol.
Anyway I'm rambling now, it's late and if my grammar is a mess I apologise but you should look this stuff up rather than just being told "Scientists say..."
@@edeledeledel5490~ Okay then, please list the names of every single one of these so-called "majority of scientists" you speak of and who exactly they all work for. I'll be waiting thx. 🇨🇦
Just tell me where the glaciers went.
Nicely spoken Brian, thank you, information, references, experience, calm and collected even when Sean was being rude.
If you require an ambulance, it should be asked if you are a protester and refused service so they don't contradict themselves.
I say the same thing about refusing to sell petrol to all these brainless cretins. Who want to ''just stop oil''
LOL!
👍
Jordan Peterson has forever changed how I view these types of interactions: there's the scientist - a person in the world actively working on the problems of society - and then there's the activist who does nothing to improve the world in real terms; and this interaction is a perfect example of that. (The cheek, questioning the professors credentials!)
Precisely. What credentials did the activist have, how many papers has he published on anything. Does he even have a degree, if he does I bet it is on golf managment or social sciences.
Jordan Peterson has fuddled your brain then cos this guy isn't working on the problem. He's a shill. The very reports he quoted don't say nuclear is the cheapest, neither do ANY levelised cost of energy report. They infact say it's one of the most expensive. The same reports say renewables are the cheapest and even with storage many well he the cheapest on 10 years.
There is a reason renewable growth is explosively exponential and nuclear has had no growth for decades.
@@Goldenlion148I have a masters in astrophysics and have never published a climate change paper. So why don't I just start spouting off shit that isn't true? Being a real scientist means listening to the people who have spent their lives researching it.
You all just say theyre backed by whatever shadow industry but if you could actually understand the data you would know that it's real.
To be fair, that last point about questioning the scientist is wrong. Just because someone is a scientist it doesn't prevent them from being questioned. If I said something controversial or questionable in my field, I'd want someone to ask me to justify myself, fellow scientist or not. Don't take everything you hear at face value.
I love Nana's work as a host - very calm and even-handed, asking sensible questions, and allowing the interviewees to explain their positions. And in the case of the activist, spout a whole lot of well-rehearsed cliches, whether they're true or not. Brian Catt was all over it - well done.
Why don’t these people just stop using oil and anything produced with oil. That would be a start.
Aye, if they are going to preach and dictate to us "climate deniers", perhaps they should lead the way and stup using anything in society that is oil derived in any way shape or form...be fun to see how far they get.
The phhysicist was spot on!! Thank Nana for getting him on the air!!!
@@TOM-TOM-TOM I suppose if people agree with the death cult, that would also be confirmation bias. I generally go for the side that wants to debate and offers facts and solutions. Did the UN say climate emergency is real. I've watched the UN deal with emergencies for decades.
It usually involves them sitting with their thumbs up their arses and filling in their expenses while wars, famines or virus outbreaks rage all around them
@@TOM-TOM-TOMsnowflake 😂
@@TOM-TOM-TOMIt's called being informed. The drip activist got all his info off UTUBE, lmao 🤣
I expect Nana learned a lot from this interview.
Says the man with visual aids using… plastic. He still can’t see beyond the end of his nose though.
That's because it grows longer telling made up LIES 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Why hasn't Brian been on the unbiased bbc, I wonder. He spoke more sense in 5 minutes than the whole of the ecoloon industry.
BBC Unbiased, don't make me laugh.
The BBC will not under any circumstances tolerate any kind of debate on climate change. Catastrophic effect of climate change is a given and BBC push this mantra daily. BBC recently put out a programme on climate change on their schools section which actually told of 3 benefits regarding CO2 emission. The climate change zealots went ballistic and the BBC quickly removed it.
@@mikeheath6516 He was being sarcastic.
Because he speaks the truth
Huws the presenter? ... that should interview him .😂😂
I wish Brian had asked the toe rag what papers he has ever published.
It’s like listening to a child try to debate against a world renowned expert. JSO we’re having a laugh when they sent that Sean up to try and debate. He got utterly destroyed
I was that age once, I hope I wasn’t that arrogant and stupid.
Just stop oils sunk to a new low getting Where's Wally involved !!
7 stone wet through, total whimp.
Just looking at that activist is enough to make you fully commit to the opposite of anything he says. What a doofus.
Well done Brian you've forgetten more than that clown knows
And to think that Sean the spokesman must be one of the smarter fools 😂
When are we going to stop letting these children tell us adults what to do.
You get told what to do/when to do/how to do every single day by people worse than kids so be quiet eh ✌️
@@scottanderson3751 no one tells me what to do
All JSO activists need to be banned/forbidden from using any mechanical transport/equipment/devices that use oil to function or in their manufacture.
Who does millennial Sean think he is?? HAS SEAN PUBLISHED ANY REPUTABLE PAPER?? HE'S LIKE THOSE VOICES MACHINES THAT ARE AUTOMATED
As a disabled person last winter was horrific for me. Scared to put on the heating and paying bills. My son came to visit and he was horrified by the cold He took over the responsibility to pay the winter bills put on the heating and filled my fridge with food. I am so lucky to have a son who could step in. So many others are not is the same position as me.
As a working person with a family it was horrific for me.Paying a mortgage no help from the government for my bills and Bank of England base rate going up and no free car.It’s hard for everyone especially those who work and have to worry about not losing their job.
@@muckspreader1able Agreed I was only explaining my circumstances. Very hard for working families.
Aww good son. ❤
@@muckspreader1ableYou're lucky you can work. Disabled people can't. When you become disabled, I suspect you'll expect help from the national insurance you've paid.
@@beatonthedonis you are hoping someone will become disabled so they can suffer like you do? What a sweet heart you are
After the coldest spring I can recall in 70 odd years (NE US) I told my wife that the eco-tards would wait for the first hot day in July to start screaming "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!"
"Hottest recorded temperatures" means nothing because we started recording weather phenomena only in 1880. That wee 143 years is a flashbulb moment in Earth's 4.5 billion years.
The glasses, the wear glasses, the jewelry, the cloths, the watch, the bracelets, literally everything we are watching in this video comes directly or indirectly from oil.
And if you go check the temperatures and co2 in the Middle Ages, you will see that it was hotter and the co2 levels were higher and there were no cars, no industry and the population was significantly lower than today.
Co2 was even higher than it is now during the last iceage
Well said Brian, you were the one with the facts.
Facts because they’re what you want to hear.
He's not though. So much of what the has said has been proven nonsense.
The JSO activist looks like he'd get a tan if he pointed a torch at himself for 5 minutes.
Shaun:”we’re demanding…” how DARE you!
Meanwhile nobody is reporting they are backtracking on their hottest day ever recorded nonsense. We have a heat warning in place today where I live. It's supposed to be 26C. Pure fearmongering.
when I was out at 8am this morning in a N/W coastal area my car temp, gauge was 25c
About time a real expert was put up against these clowns
We need more of this scientist to speak up with the facts
He's unfunded tho. The others take the £ and say what the green machine wants them to say. Climate scam!!
The scientist is bang on the money, its utter crap.
He’s not a climate scientist though is he. His chemical engineering degree is 50 years old and nothing suggests he has ever worked in the sector. Don’t be fooled
@@paulharrison2325 he did publish in the field, and you can't publish anything of value if you haven't been in the field. He's already answered for his qualifications. And just cuz someone had a degree 50yrs ago, doesn't mean he's unqualified, unless you're 12 and haven't worked a day in your life
Quite. A fifty year old qualification is far less relevant than how the graduate spent the fifty years hence.
This fellow remained within his chosen field and has undoubtedly discovered and achieved far more in that time than he did during his initial student years.
When he says "we need to immediately invest", he's not talking about the free market. He's talking about ponying up tax payer dollars to fund this idiocy. If renewables were cheaper, companies would already be investing significant dollars in their development. The fact that this isn't happening on any large scale is all the proof you need that the free market has indeed spoken on the matter and done so very resoundingly.
Hooray! A scientist that knows what they're talking about, from inter glacial periods to the amount of time it takes to build a nuclear power plant, that's not afraid to tell it like it is!
Hooray to Brian Catt!!!
He says he knows what he is talking about, but so does the other guy. So are you going to do any actual peer reviewed researched or just agree with whatever video aligns with your point?
Yes,..... I'm sure he has retired because Soros won't be funding any of HIS research grants.🙀
Brian Catt is not an expert. He has written no papers on this subject. He has a high second class degree in physics but has no formal education in climate related science. You seem to want him to be right.
@@Atom.Storm. he´s a Scientist, the other is not......🤷🤷♂
@@stephenconway2468 Is the nonce looking one on the right an expert? Please list his papers on the subject and details of his formal education in climate related science. You seem to want him to be right.