EAT YOUR BREAKFAST! Turn 1 wins with Legacy Cheerios! Kobolds, Memnites, Glimpse your whole deck MTG

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 116

  • @OriginalDad
    @OriginalDad 2 роки тому +30

    "I did what I was supposed to and it sucked!"
    Yeah, that's cheerios.

  • @marcagel
    @marcagel 2 роки тому +33

    Ah, absolutely warms my heart to see Cheeri0s content! As the 2011 Source poster for the deck it truly is a glass cannon that just folds so hard to FoW/FoN. I still have it built but stopped playing it when FoN came out as even with a bit beefier mana count and Veil in it still folds to U. A couple of thoughts if you're ever going to sling it again:
    1) I never play more than 2 Scapegoats, and usually just one.
    2) Whether it's Beck/Call or Rite for Glimpses 5-X, I usually don't run a full playset as you can flood on them when comboing. Would recommend just running 2-3.
    3) Noxious is also very handy, but like Scapegoat, only as a 2-of in the MD.
    4) I do love Assault Formation as the other 1-of wincon next to Grapeshot. I've won with it more often than you'd imagine as it makes Shield Sphere a beater.
    5) 3 duals is about 1 over the recommended amount.
    Also fun trivia: The original name of the deck was "Oh-face" but Gerry T made it more PG and stuck with the combo=breakfast cereal theme and named it "Cheerios" during commentary.

    • @rosly_yt
      @rosly_yt 2 роки тому

      What's your opinion on pre-boarding a playset of allisaurus rider to hedge against countermagic, and then maybe adding two endurance to counteract the tempo disadvantage of wasting turn 1 on it? Pitch-cast creatures seem like they'd spice the deck up a little. Against nonblue decks, you swap them out for more 0s and just podrace.

    • @marcagel
      @marcagel 2 роки тому

      @@rosly_yt I've toyed with a bunch of pitch-cast over the years, with Skyshroud Cutter being the clear winner in the "I don't want to have all 0-CMC costed creatures" contest. I have not tested it with Endurance but that seems like it could work, especially in a build that is running Cutters and Beck/Call to up the G count for the pitch.
      As a fun variant, I have run a build with a singleton Gaea's Cradle in it to make Assault Formation truly terrifying as a "Plan B". That build also runs a number of Walking Ballista to dump mana into and deal with creature-based things like Thalia that shut the deck down.
      The deck REALLY cares about critical mass and fizzle %. Little things like "thinning" and land slots all make differences in the fizzle rate.
      I did have some success splitting the Gas/Find Gas pile into 4x Glimpse, 2x Personal Tutor, 2x Beck/Call to allow for a T1 tutor for Glimpse that couldn't be Thoughtseized but could still get around Chalice on 0. Made moot when FoN got printed, but still...

    • @rosly_yt
      @rosly_yt 2 роки тому

      @@marcagel That's really interesting, I'd love to see someone try a few variations of this deck with these changes. I think the deck is also weirdly good at sideboarding for a combo deck, which is interesting. Thanks for telling me about these variants!

    • @jefftrvecvlt1819
      @jefftrvecvlt1819 Рік тому

      Damn you are the original dude that got me into this deck. I remember u on SCG years ago! Im currently playing less combo and more aggro -- with signal pests xantid swarms, curse of predation

  • @slippyminaj
    @slippyminaj 2 роки тому +13

    Quite honestly my favorite legacy deck. I love the fear that enters the stack when they try to force your glimpse and you drop a pact of Negation

  • @MartGriffin
    @MartGriffin 2 роки тому +17

    At the time I watched this video it had an equal number of likes and watches... As it should be! :D

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому +2

      That’s a good ratio!

    • @Dreg_s
      @Dreg_s 2 роки тому +6

      I bring bad news from the future!

  • @peterkamajian
    @peterkamajian 2 роки тому +4

    "We have Paradoxical Outcome at home"
    The PO at home: glimpse+kobolds+scapegoat

  • @mus0u
    @mus0u 2 роки тому +33

    narset's static ability should have been symmetrical like spirit of the labyrinth.

    • @nthnthms1212
      @nthnthms1212 2 роки тому +1

      War of the Spark really wanted to push it

    • @turgid4391
      @turgid4391 2 роки тому +1

      That would actually make for some interesting deck building ideas. Instant speed cantrips would be even more valuable and non drawing cantrips might actually see play in modern.

    • @noneofyourbusiness4133
      @noneofyourbusiness4133 2 роки тому

      But muh power creep 🥺

  • @DuduRossetto
    @DuduRossetto 2 роки тому +2

    "I did what I was supposed to do and it was bad" pretty much sums up everey single atempt I ever made at being competitive at magic

  • @glezrause
    @glezrause 2 роки тому +4

    Assault Formation is a superior alternative to Goblin Bushwacker. Can be deployed before you start building your board, let's you attack over multiple turns instead of only once, pairs really well with Thopters and Walkers, and can be cast with ESG.

    • @KainiusTheGreat
      @KainiusTheGreat 2 роки тому +2

      It also makes Shield Sphere not only playable but a real threat.

    • @DocZecon
      @DocZecon 2 роки тому

      Assault doesn't give haste though.

    • @KainiusTheGreat
      @KainiusTheGreat 2 роки тому

      @@DocZecon nope, but it sets up a long play scenario...I think the bigger issue is it's not a creature but I don't know if 8 Glimpse effects are needed. I used to run 6 with Beck//Call and didn't have problems (beyond what the deck normally suffers from).

  • @spathhouse9355
    @spathhouse9355 2 роки тому +3

    love this deck. had a friends years ago that loved to take a version of this to tournaments. He preferred to call it " Dumping Donuts". donuts being 0 cost dudes. he even had custom sleeves with the dunking donuts logo

  • @ModAnonMTG
    @ModAnonMTG 2 роки тому +6

    omg that G1, Glimpse on the stack, I immediately said "all right lets see the FoW"
    Love some Kobold action, excited to see this!

  • @benlittle5543
    @benlittle5543 2 роки тому +1

    Turkey bounce. Removing a creature that is blocking another creature with lifelink to prevent the life gain. Love it

  • @ethanfordford6621
    @ethanfordford6621 2 роки тому +6

    Honestly when I played this deck waiting a turn usually was helpful for combo potential

    • @ethanfordford6621
      @ethanfordford6621 2 роки тому

      @@AutumnReel4444 honestly this deck needs 8 pieces to consistently go off so I agree (2 glimpse 2 mana sources and at least 4 zero drop creatures)

  • @jameshill2450
    @jameshill2450 2 роки тому +1

    I love this deck, been playing it forever (never in real tournaments of course). I'm the one that introduced Ingot Chewer as the anti-Chalice tech of choice.

  • @ethanj3612
    @ethanj3612 2 роки тому +5

    At 24:27 you could have cast rite by sacrificing cantor and pitching guide, then cast the kobolds to draw 2. I think that is significantly better odds than just playing the Kobold and hoping to find enough 0's for grapeshot, or scapegoat.

  • @Claymore2007
    @Claymore2007 2 роки тому +1

    Oh boy this, is a deck I didn't think I'd see again. I still remember late nights with buddies jamming builds of this trying to find the best build to meme an SCG Open with. I still remember checking on one of them after finishing my round to find his opponent, a mix of amused and despondent, keeping track of the storm on a d20 while he watched the magic happen. We didn't do well at the tournament, but we had a blast doing it.

  • @RickHardpack
    @RickHardpack 2 роки тому +5

    I think Phil had a better version of this where it was also an Affinity list so if you fizzled, you just had 40 power worth of dumb robots.

  • @85mcarnold
    @85mcarnold 2 роки тому +4

    “Cheerios started with the printing of Glimpse of Nature”? Did the Vintage Champ forget about the infamous Kobolds/Carnival of Souls/Skullclamp deck? For shame!

  • @morgoth2425
    @morgoth2425 2 роки тому +2

    dang what a rollercoaster deck! so funny when it goes off though

  • @sheepy403
    @sheepy403 2 роки тому +4

    In regards to the "worried about my win conditions being the bottom 2 cards of my deck," there is at least some potential counterplay for it. If your life total isn't too low or you've got spare mana and you've kept a Noxious Revival in hand (which you surely have when there's 3 in the deck), you can respond to each lethal draw trigger by using Noxious Revival to put another Noxious Revival back on top. And if your wincons are your bottom 2 cards AND your resources are low, then that's just one more loss for this deck that we chalk up to the Magic Gods saying no

  • @RocketCrazy117
    @RocketCrazy117 2 роки тому +4

    THIS IS WHAT IVE BEEN WAITING FOR FOR A LONG TIME! ❤

  • @CodeProvider
    @CodeProvider 2 роки тому +1

    my man didnt even think about paying for hermit at 31:40
    3 guides bro!!! show em who's boss!!!

  • @anaphysik
    @anaphysik 2 роки тому +1

    Scapegoat is such a weird, old card. I've had one in my collection ever since I started playing and always wondered what it could really be used for. It's nice to see that it has a weird home for its weird ability!

  • @jnsilentbob912
    @jnsilentbob912 2 роки тому +1

    48:39 : "...I'm not planning on them getting a turn". Proceeds to play walking ballista for X=1 instead of using it for a draw, keeps in surgical over 0's, uses lotus petal for aforementioned ballista instead of using it for scapegoat, .
    Other than that small part, great videos. Keep up the good content! :D

  • @whatwas44
    @whatwas44 2 роки тому +4

    I remember being so mad about cheerios beating me turn 1 years ago that I included Marrow Shards in my side board for a few weeks at my local tournament

  • @WLDFLD
    @WLDFLD 2 роки тому +2

    the boundless optimism of this deck's creator

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому +1

      What if nobody had interaction AND the deck drew the right cards in the right order every time?

  • @nickbianchini3967
    @nickbianchini3967 2 роки тому +1

    Definitely a force-check deck!

  • @somepl3b
    @somepl3b 2 роки тому +2

    Vanguard needs to make a come back tbh, also so cool that you uploaded this I've been brewing with Rite in modern, been getting T3 kills on the regular.

  • @wreagin1
    @wreagin1 2 роки тому +1

    Love this deck.

  • @dragonisseth
    @dragonisseth 2 роки тому +1

    " I did what I was supposed to do... and it was bad." ~ B Coval

  • @batsmak2506
    @batsmak2506 2 роки тому +1

    Classic Scapegoat Control. Old school Yu-Gi-Oh! at its best.

  • @NoticemeSinPi
    @NoticemeSinPi 2 роки тому +3

    Years ago I used to mess around with a deck like this but based on Multani's Presence with Chalice of the Void on 0 to counter my own spells to trigger the draws though it was more artifact egg based instead of creature
    Multani's Presence
    Mana Cost: Green
    Enchantment
    Whenever a spell you've cast is countered, draw a card.
    This kind of makes me want to revisit it.

    • @Pastrytime
      @Pastrytime 2 роки тому

      Wait this is so spicy I'm ready to brew haha

    • @NoticemeSinPi
      @NoticemeSinPi 2 роки тому

      @@Pastrytime also, because it was mostly artifact eggs, I also sometimes played Swiftspears in either sb or even in the main.
      Not that it was ever all that good, but it was entertaining to show up with a card most people don't know exists.

    • @adamshenett4220
      @adamshenett4220 2 роки тому

      I used to play cheerios a lot! Multanis was a sideboard card for me, because I knew they would throw a chalice in. Plus yourself throwing in a chalice confused the crap out of them after the first game.

  • @btbwilkinson
    @btbwilkinson Рік тому +2

    Came back to rewatch this after the dumpstering in this weeks monowhite vid. 🤣🤣

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  Рік тому +1

      I hope my commentary held up haha.

  • @mrrandomassduck
    @mrrandomassduck Рік тому +1

    Round 2, a summary: "Who's the burn deck NOW, OP?!" xD

  • @matthewbeard7841
    @matthewbeard7841 2 роки тому +1

    I read the title of the video before I saw the thumbnail so I thought I was in for some Cephalid Breakfast combo but this just as delightful!

    • @DarkestFiction
      @DarkestFiction 2 роки тому

      Hard Same, I was excited, but then I saw Cheerios. Not going to complain, but damn was I wanting a Cephalid Breakfast list :(

    • @matthewbeard7841
      @matthewbeard7841 2 роки тому

      @@DarkestFiction I think BoshNRoll said in a video recently that Cephalid Breakfast was in the video queue so that's probably why I was thinking about it.

    • @DarkestFiction
      @DarkestFiction 2 роки тому

      @@matthewbeard7841 Exciting if true! I love Cephalid Breakfast, it's a dumb fun combo.

  • @Interesting_Failure
    @Interesting_Failure 2 роки тому +1

    I wish Force of Virtue and Force of Rage didn't suck so bad, it almost seems like you could do a manaless (or at least landless) version of this.

  • @senken12
    @senken12 2 роки тому +1

    Round 2 Game 3, once you'd got the 2nd Elvish Spirit Guide, you could use Wild Cantor to get the 2nd Rite of Harmony so the next creature was draw 2

  • @noneofyourbusiness4133
    @noneofyourbusiness4133 2 роки тому +3

    29:13
    This one of the MOST fun I’ve had watching your content, so I only wish I could double subscribe ^u^

  • @MaeseEidos
    @MaeseEidos 2 роки тому +1

    40:15 "Glimpse, Scapegoat, Keep" shirts when?

  • @quille9879
    @quille9879 2 роки тому +3

    I feel like you could have taken the line to noxious your glimpse more, especially if your hand is 2 creatures 1 noxious 1 mana

  • @danielcrocker9378
    @danielcrocker9378 2 роки тому +1

    With this deck you have to make the build to commit to the combo …you can’t get cute with it

  • @phelandiller4066
    @phelandiller4066 2 роки тому +1

    When they go to 2 at 46:45 Grapeshot also became a lethal topdeck and would have beeb glorious!

  • @mushclone298
    @mushclone298 2 роки тому +2

    I wonder if making this a bad, but more resilient turn 3 or 4 combo with Kobolds/Glimpses/Cloudstone Curio would be better than the generally bad turn 1 or 2 combo it currently is. xD

  • @clawtooth35
    @clawtooth35 2 роки тому +1

    So is this essentially Legacy's answer to Paradoxical Outcome? Obviously it's existed since before PO was printed.

  • @stavroskosmas8875
    @stavroskosmas8875 2 роки тому +2

    At 40:00 if you played out your lotus petal i think you could noxious revival and then grapeshot to kill the oracle

    • @GuidoMigliorini
      @GuidoMigliorini 2 роки тому

      thought the same but I think even with the dead oracle opponent would have had 2 devotion from thought lash, so even noxious wouldn't have saved him since cards in library would have been less than devotion

    • @DarkestFiction
      @DarkestFiction 2 роки тому

      Problem with your line is that Grapeshot is a sorcery, so that does nothing.

    • @stavroskosmas8875
      @stavroskosmas8875 2 роки тому

      Oops lol didn't realize it

    • @stavroskosmas8875
      @stavroskosmas8875 2 роки тому

      Also I think he could exile with lash in response

    • @GuidoMigliorini
      @GuidoMigliorini 2 роки тому

      @@stavroskosmas8875 lash prevents damage to you, not your creatures :) but yeah, I too forgot grapeshot is a sorcery XD

  • @mikesanchez5429
    @mikesanchez5429 2 роки тому +1

    I use to play personal tutor and summoners pact to find my mana

  • @DarkestFiction
    @DarkestFiction 2 роки тому +1

    In G2M2, you did make a mistake in picking up Cantor. You always want to float it in play, because it represents a mana source that you don't get back. You lose out on one draw, but because it was turn 1 with no response from the opponent, you just have it floating. It's not a free card like the others, it's mana neutral, but in a deck that you need mana to pop off and you only have 3 lands, 4 Petal, and 4 ESG, it's better in play.

  • @vex_dk
    @vex_dk 2 роки тому +1

    i think you need all of the Noxious Revival to get 2 glimse going

  • @MarioSpeedrunGame
    @MarioSpeedrunGame 2 роки тому +5

    SMOKIN MY LUNGS TO HELL I DONT KNOW WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON WITH THE DECK GONNA ADMIT BUT IM SO FUCKING HIGH AS A GIRAFFES NUTTSACK I DONT CARE IM STILL BLASTIN THAT BOSH VOICE SMOKIN THAT BOSH PACK LIVIN THAT LIFE STYLE ENJOYING THE COLORS GOING FROM HAND TO FIELD LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOO SMOKE WEED WATCH BOSH SMOKE WEED WATCH BOSH SMOKE WEED

  • @Reversespacehippie
    @Reversespacehippie 2 роки тому +1

    obligatory algorithmic contribution

  • @noneofyourbusiness4133
    @noneofyourbusiness4133 2 роки тому +1

    Only three lands in the main deck,…. Seems like me when I first started playing the game XD

  • @kiriyamathelama1809
    @kiriyamathelama1809 2 роки тому +2

    The Phil Gallagher special

  • @HughLeFitness
    @HughLeFitness 2 роки тому +1

    Soooooo janky, but super fun to watch it go off haha!

  • @aidankeyes5526
    @aidankeyes5526 2 роки тому +1

    Force of virtue maybe? Doesn't it pitch cast and is an anthem.

  • @NezMog
    @NezMog 2 роки тому +1

    This deck really scratches that niche Johnny itch but man folding to the Narset or Hullbreacher is such a feels bad

  • @chrisl9782
    @chrisl9782 2 роки тому +1

    screaming out to the void here, has anyone made steps on a Etrata, the Silencer + Mari, the Killing Quill Legacy deck?

  • @Korwinga
    @Korwinga 2 роки тому +1

    The prevalence of narset/hullbreacher in legacy right now makes cheerios with no answers for them a rough ask. I still love the deck though.

  • @eamonworden4369
    @eamonworden4369 2 роки тому +2

    Thinking about similar decks, would serum powder be a possibility or does it ruin the chain after you start comboing? I know in dredge it’s good cause you only need to draw bazaar but is it possible serum powder could be good enough in this archetype too?

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому

      It’s really bad when you’re comboing, and you only have 2 wincons. Would be tough to pitch one. Also I almost decked every time I went off. I have concerns haha

  • @dessydragon
    @dessydragon 2 роки тому +1

    Would a card like Street Wraith be good in this deck? The life total swing shouldn't matter much, but the added consistency might.

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому +1

      I was close to decking on my combo runs. I wonder what the math is to improve finding glimpses vs running out of cards

    • @dessydragon
      @dessydragon 2 роки тому

      @@BoshNRoll If this deck were better, probably someone would figure that out, but as things stand, the world may never know!

  • @stevenrhodes8338
    @stevenrhodes8338 2 роки тому +1

    Playing ballista earlier woulda probably got you the w

  • @archerlamb7960
    @archerlamb7960 2 роки тому +1

    With the round 4 decision to bring in shepherds based on little to no information, why not just run it in main if you’re so willing to board it in?

  • @deteresaFlamenco
    @deteresaFlamenco 2 роки тому +1

    TuRkEy BoUnCe

  • @rosly_yt
    @rosly_yt 2 роки тому +1

    It seems like Rite of Harmony and Elvish Spirit Guide are both often bricks, what do you think about going down to 2 of each of those and bringing in more 0s? And then maybe swap a Noxious Revival for another Scapegoat, and maybe one more Wild Cantor, since those two are the the only ways to get out of a situation where you're out of gas. Cool deck, probably never going to be tier 1, but I think there's some value being left on the table here.
    EDIT: looks like you saw the Scapegoat thing. Narset and Hullbreacher both die to Lightning bolt, and I think this deck wants some number of Allosaurus Shepherd main since it folds so hard to countermagic. I think 4 ingot chewer in the sideboard is a bit much, since nature's claim does basically the same thing while also giving you some play against red deck wins, so you have plenty of room to slot some Lightning Bolts or Furys or Endurances in the side.
    Cool deck, thanks for playing these somewhat painful games with it.

    • @ankhi3585
      @ankhi3585 2 роки тому

      You need at least one mana source and a glimpse effect in your starting hand. I don't know if cutting one of those is really an option.

    • @rosly_yt
      @rosly_yt 2 роки тому

      @@ankhi3585 Several games happened where the Rite was in his opening hand and he wasn't able to cast it. Spirit guide often showed up at the wrong time, and having to cast a 3 drop in this deck is awful, especially when most relevant threats in the format have some sort of evasion.
      Even with cutting two elvish spirit guides, the deck has 13 mana sources, plus some bonus ones if you count noxious revival +lotus petal/land grant, which is still enough to reliably draw one mana source in your opener.

  • @crovax1375
    @crovax1375 2 роки тому +2

    I could see Stonecoil Serpent as being a decent card in this deck

    • @ryanchase9332
      @ryanchase9332 2 роки тому +2

      Stonecoil should definitely be in over Rogagh because it isn't Legendary.

  • @Narcomoeba1
    @Narcomoeba1 2 роки тому +1

    Wouldn't the 0cc artifact creature Shield Sphere be better as it can buy you several turns?

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому

      It has defender, non-bo with whacking

  • @prevara5162
    @prevara5162 2 роки тому +1

    seems pretty weird to not play a full playset of scapegoat. I don't know anything about this deck but the card seems WAY better than nox revival

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому +1

      More scapegoats was one of my recs at the end

  • @100legodude
    @100legodude 2 роки тому +1

    So is this deck better or worse than Mr. Toad's Wild Ride?

  • @chrismarch6644
    @chrismarch6644 Рік тому +1

    rites get in the way.

  • @Lucat27
    @Lucat27 2 роки тому +1

    Why allosaurus shepherd? None of the Cheerios are Green.

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому

      The cheerios aren’t the important cards to resolve

    • @Lucat27
      @Lucat27 2 роки тому +1

      @@BoshNRoll Ah, misread the card. I thought it specified creatures. Turns out Allosaurous Shepherd is even stronger than I thought.

  • @WigglyWoobah
    @WigglyWoobah 2 роки тому +1

    No Honey or nuts?

  • @johnd5619
    @johnd5619 2 роки тому +1

    it honestly baffles me....when i watched this vid it had 1300 views and 104 likes. come on people, just click the button.

  • @LAZURCATZ
    @LAZURCATZ 2 роки тому +1

    This deck looks painful

  • @ryanwondertroll
    @ryanwondertroll 2 роки тому +1

    plz mulligan a little more :(

  • @bencouch1178
    @bencouch1178 2 роки тому +1

    Cheerio decks always make me so sad. You look at them in the decktech and it looks amazing and fun, then you go out and play it and it just kinda does nothing

  • @royj492
    @royj492 2 роки тому +1

    To many dead cards in the deck

  • @arenmaxwilson-wright3435
    @arenmaxwilson-wright3435 2 роки тому +1

    How many likes does this video have to get for you to change your name to Brian Kobold?

    • @BoshNRoll
      @BoshNRoll  2 роки тому +2

      At 1 million subscribers I’ll start the paperwork