Q&A: Amartya Sen - Why Is the Penalty of Inequality So High in India?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @HindiVyakran_
    @HindiVyakran_ 5 років тому +5

    We Indians have Proud on you sir

  • @priyangshudhara3870
    @priyangshudhara3870 Рік тому

    The question of Kaushik Basu was absolutely spot on the real issue in the discussion topic.

  • @pawanjadhav124
    @pawanjadhav124 2 роки тому +1

    Great !! 🌎 💰 📈
    Intellectual and profound personality..
    Prof.Dr. #Amartya_Sen
    #chief_economist researcher Nobel laureate 🏅

  • @LightMusic791
    @LightMusic791 2 роки тому

    Proud of India

  • @juliannevillecorrea
    @juliannevillecorrea 9 років тому +1

    #economics #philosophy #decisiontheory #socialchoicetheory #welfareeconomics #theoryofmeasurement #developmenteconomics #publichealth #genderstudies Sefra Correa Marielyn Correa Wilson Correa

  • @ambedkaritesofbengal790
    @ambedkaritesofbengal790 5 років тому +2

    Coming to the last question, I would like to say that Nehruvian model was primarily based on Castiest separation because the scientific and technical education couldn't be afforded by so called lower castes across the country. His vision of the educated India was on the line of Manusmriti that prescribes the privileges of upper caste Hindus and the degradation of lower castes. What is the outcome? ? Everyone in India knows that the Nehruvian model of higher education has failed miserably in the country.

    • @rakhimukerji7937
      @rakhimukerji7937 4 роки тому

      But wAS it not an education policy geared to top heavy whi h wanted to produce brilliant e gin eers and scientists to keep up with the advanced economies.Perhaps it was a gesture to bring India in tbe world of rich and powerful

  • @dams0001
    @dams0001 2 роки тому

    Re: the last question - surely it ought to have been evident to a man as intelligent as Nehru was that there was scarcely any reason a "trickle-down" approach in education could succeed?