Kasparov & Carlsen Use This STRATEGY To Win At Chess
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 чер 2024
- Learn 3 Main Ways To Improve Your Chess Results Significantly
FREE Masterclass ► chess-teacher.com/masterclass
Take Your Chess Skills To The Next Level With High-Quality Courses
Learn here ► online.chess-teacher.com/
💰💲 Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
🔹 Fischer's Rule to Prevent Mistakes - • Fischer's Rule Will Pr...
♛ Find the games shown in the video in this blog-post - chess-teacher.com/kasparov-ch...
When two of the highest-rated chess players ever agree on the main idea to win at chess, it's hard to debate its effectiveness. In this video lesson, GM Igor Smirnov will share with you a strategy endorsed by both Magnus Carlsen and the legendary Garry Kasparov. It's a rule that, when applied skillfully, can lead to brutal victories on the chessboard.
According to Garry Kasparov, if you make ten threats in a row, your opponent is bound to blunder eventually. While executing ten threats consecutively may not always be possible, the key is to keep the pressure on your opponent by creating threats whenever you can.
Sooner or later, your opponent will crack under this relentless pressure, leading to a tactical error. This rule emphasizes that even simple, one-move threats can be highly effective in mounting pressure.
▬▬▬▬▬▬
► Chapters
00:00 Magnus Carlsen quotes Garry Kasparov's chess strategy
00:19 Carlsen uses Kasparov's golden chess rule
02:12 Creating a threat every move
03:31 Garry Kasparov's example game
05:48 White eventually blunders
08:11 How would you play here?
📗 Free chess courses - chess-teacher.com/rca-freebies/
#GMSmirnov #ChessRules #ChessStrategy #GarryKasparov #MagnusCarlsen #ChessTips - Спорт
![Kasparov Gambit in the Sicilian Defense [FOOLED Karpov] 🔥](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gvSiRmNT0_M/mqdefault.jpg)
💡 Register to GM Igor Smirnov's FREE Masterclass "The Best Way to Improve at Chess INSTANTLY" - chess-teacher.com/masterclass
💲 Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
I got to 600-700 to 2000 in 8 months thanks to some youtubers and you are one of them! I work so hard(I started too late, at age of 14) and I hope I would be one of the great players in the world, thank you!
bro tht is crazy man.can u give tips?
@@sweetysureka1573 You can watch historical games, especially Tal's(They are mind blowing).you can install Chessable, also you can get Dvoretsky's End Game Tactics, Chess Tactics for Champions, and 1001 Brilliant Ways To Checkmate(They are some books and you can get their pdf). Also play much more
How many hours do you play chess??
@@adityaxvlogsI play usually 1.30-2 hour, but if you mean do something about Chess, Its usually 3 hours. But it changes so much.
@@sweetysureka1573i got from 500 to 2000 in 4 months play a loy
Igor always makes the videos so pleasurable to watch, throwing in cheeky comments (4:43) and explaining in a way everyone can understand! Keep it up! ❤😄
❤
That was funny
What a great little lesson, something as a beginner I would have never thought of doing! Thanks
It is easy to dodge a heavy punch because it is slow, but it is hard to dodge a barrage punch because it is fast. That's why this idea is very strong
I was loosing a game once, and I remembered watching this video, so I used the rule and won!
Great video GM Smirnov, love your channel! Will definitely use this to improve at chess :)
Was wondering at 3:09, why can't white play pawn 1.d5? Looked it up on Lichess, and in fact engine (Stockfish 14+) says it's actually better than Rdd1 by +1.0 points! The engine's idea: if black goes on to fork with 1...e4, white has 2.Nd4, threatening the knight. If black takes the rook 2...exd3, then 3.Nxc6 wins the knight while forking the bishop and rook; black was winning, but at this point engine says black is only slightly better (my guess is because black's e-pawn is no longer supported by f-pawn, but now stranded behind enemy lines and will be lost soon). Conversely, engine recommends 2...Nxd4 after 2.Nf4; as black is forced to recapture with 3.Rxd4, and then 3...Bf3 pins the rooks and wins a rook for a bishop
Underrated comment , deep knowledge and board vision for u❤️🩹
► Chapters
00:00 Magnus Carlsen quotes Garry Kasparov's chess strategy
00:19 Carlsen uses Kasparov's golden chess rule
02:12 Creating a threat every move
03:31 Garry Kasparov's example game
05:48 White eventually blunders
08:11 How would you play here?
Thanks! For golden rules
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 🏆 *Winning Chess Strategy Overview*
- Both Magnus Carlsen and Garry Kasparov emphasize the strategy of creating threats to win in chess.
- Carlsen's primary rule is to make continuous threats, believing that the opponent will eventually blunder under pressure.
01:10 🤔 *Carlsen's Practical Application: Move by Move*
- Carlsen, playing as Black, applies the strategy by making simple one-move threats consistently.
- Highlights include using Rook movements, pawn advances, and exploiting weaknesses, gradually building pressure until White blunders.
03:57 🧠 *Kasparov's Strategy Application: Positional Play*
- Kasparov, playing as Black, showcases applying the strategy during the middle game.
- Kasparov starts with threats involving Rook maneuvers, focuses on pawn pressure, and exploits positional weaknesses, leading to White making mistakes.
06:02 🔄 *Kasparov's Continuous Threats and Winning Material*
- Kasparov demonstrates a series of threats, culminating in a material advantage.
- Despite a seemingly equal exchange, Kasparov's continuous threats force White into a blunder, securing a winning position.
08:08 🚀 *Kasparov's Endgame Tactics*
- Kasparov maintains the strategy in the endgame, creating threats even with a material advantage.
- Highlights include precise Queen maneuvers, maintaining pressure, and forcing White into a resignation.
Made with HARPA AI
Awesome video
I follow this advice, along with Fischer's commandment about invading pieces.
Could you quote or explain this idea? I did not find it while googling.
GM Nigel Short once said, " Blunder does not happen in a vacuum, it came from an enormous sustained pressure".
Depends on the level!
This is extremely useful in faster time controls but tends to drop off in slower, classical games. In slow time control it's better to search for the actual best move, which might not always be an attacking move.
I disagree.
Attacking chess is always the right play (if you don’t have hikaru’s defense).
You just have to calculate that the threats you make aren’t weakening your position.
It requires calculation, but aggressive chess will always win out unless you’re a computer.
@@MyBiPolarBearMax This video was about making constant threats, you're confusing attacking style with making constant threats. Yes, attacking game style should be preferred but you shouldn't always make 10 threats in a row (at least not in slow time controls). There are many openings that lead to a lot of maneuvering in the middle game. You seem to however understand this perfectly well as you say that you need to calculate the threats not just "oh I can attack their queen here".
Also, the games here were cherry-picked, could as well show Kasparov games where he is not playing like this and still winning.
8:15 why no Nxh3+? The check prevents takign the Queen and simultaneously puts Knight on a place where Queen defends it.
This seems like an excellent strategy
Bruh who gave this guy 439k subs
He needs 9999x more
idk this is just how tempo works. If you are creating a threat, they need to waste moves defending and answering the threats. They would need to defend while also attacking at the same time to make any progress.
Yes he learnt that from this video. He time travelled to the future saw your video then went back in time and used the advice even though strangely enough it was inspired by him. Quantum chess
Hi Igor I'm at 8:11- doesn't Kasparov have Nxh3+ after White's Qe3? This wins White's Queen as it's check, the King has to move or Queen captures the knight, either is forced followed by. ...Qxh3 or Qxe3.
No because after Kg2 the knight is trapped.
@@atuema1602 Aha I see what you are saying. If Kg2 or Kh2, it's just a queen trade after Qxe3 and the knight is still hanging. But, if fxe3 or Nxf3 I think black can retreat the knight to g5. Nxh3 is commital for Black as he has to do the queen trade or lose the knight as well. Thanks, Qa4 is better for black definitely.
@@Chunda8 Yeah sorry I was in a hurry, bad way to phrase it the knight isn't trapped, what I meant to say is it forces a queen trade or your knight is trapped, in fact it's a perfectly okay way to proceed (taking the pawn), nothing particularly wrong with it. You're still clearly winning. But the point is you don't have to capture with the queen, you can just move the king forward. Qa4, and probably knight d3, are just better. Why grab a pawn when you can win the game!
4:45 kasparov himself learnt from this video😂
I'm just happy to create one threat 😄
In the Kasparov game, couldn’t white play knight takes rook instead of queen? This would keep his bishop defended by the queen
So that means if you are being attacked and threatened be extra vigilant against blundering knowing that repeated pressure increases this likelihood so you increase your vigilance.
❤
❤
❤❤❤❤everything you do is always the best ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 🎉🎉🎉 😢 😮😮😅😊😊
This works because most people have limited working memory capacity.
How chess can be brutal? Opponents hit each another ?
Those move sounds are so annoying holy shit
Quite simple: The opponents were not able to create threats, so somebody who do not creates threats and is only defending his positions must loose after some time.