Why the Su-35 Is More Dangerous than You Think
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 тра 2024
- The Sukhoi SU-35 is a Russian-made, advanced fighter jet designed for air superiority missions. It has been in service since 2014 and has been exported to several countries.
In terms of its capabilities, the SU-35 is a highly maneuverable and agile fighter jet with advanced avionics and weapons systems. It has a top speed of Mach 2.25 (about 1,500 mph) and a combat range of over 1,500 miles. It can carry a variety of air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons, including missiles, bombs, and rockets.
Don't care which side of the world you're on this is a beautiful plane.
For sure!
Aircraft and especially military aircraft are not designed for esthetic beauty, they are designed to successfully carry out missions and be reliable. One of America's ugliest planes the A10 is so ugly it's called the Warthog. You don't ever want to be on the wrong side of this killing machine. If you are you probably have only seconds to live.
Probably built like a tank too.
@Collossus I remember one Russian pilot saying about Russian planes "you cannot break this plane." And it's true. They really are built like tanks while American planes are built like Swiss watches. I saw this Russian fighter jet land with no landing gear, sparks flying everywhere. They jacked the plane up, fixed the landing gear and it was ready to fly again. The runaways could have all kinds of debris, rocks, anything and it's not a problem. US planes take off and land on runways that are kept pristine. The US bought and flies 23 Mig 29s. They know the plane well,its strengths and weaknesses. In combat they know strategies that will force it to be at its most vulnerable. Mig 29 is the Soviet plane most likely to be the adversary deployed by many countries.
@@markfischer3626 Stinger wants to talk to you...
SUKHOI have a great art department
@@chasehamlet No dude I just use Airfix ,Hobby and Trumpeter instructions sheets which have very detailed explanations, probably using things like jane's to get their info from for their construction layout . The Styling of Sukhoi jets are works of engineering art.
@@MrSCOTTtheSCOT sorry man, I thought you were another one of those commenting on the lack of Sukhoi aircraft
Inferencing there fleet to resemble an art department.. 😅
@@chasehamlet Nope I make a lot of models , and the Sukhoi flanker series are detailed in a way that's more aesthetically pleasing than the more angular NATO counter parts, but does so for their slightly different war roles. I don't care about which jet out performs which , I believe all aircraft are engineering works of art Sukhoi though have a distinct styling.
@@MrSCOTTtheSCOT nice! I’m currently converting a Guillows se5 - a model into an rc plane for my recently passed grandfather. Very fun indeed. I agree, I admire the engineering rather than end use.
Funnily enough they don't
The fact it looks good is purely accidental
I don’t care what it’s capabilities are, they look fantastic!
@Bass Freq he said it looks fantastic. Dont be stupid
@Bass Freq not only for airshows, it's also excellent at rendering salty uncle Sam fanboys completely incapable to untwist their panties😂
The beauty of Sukhois design.
Ugly
Last decades technology
@@williamzk9083I wouldn’t be so naive
It kinda looks like flyin Porsche or Mclaren.
It has that sporty looks and elegance
@@Kennnnyy__ 1 it doesn’t have stealth 2 it doesn’t have internal weapons bays 3 it can’t fly over Ukraine because it gets shot down 4 it gets shot down by 30 year old Soviet era S300 and it gets shot down by MANPADS. It can do the cobra manoeuvre which is like break dancing in an artillery barrage.
never underestimate the SU-35.
Yeah all 8 of them.
@@markdsm-5157 that’s a pretty high number, I thought it was like 5 or 4
@@memezilla4595 giving them hope.
@@markdsm-5157 Why would I give Russia hope?
@EnglishExpatTeacher are Losers,🚫⚫️ back to your hole, bot.
And one of the most beautiful airframes ever! GORGEOUS!
I always like the look of the Mig-29 Fulcrum.
Su-57 more beauty 🤩😍
Specs aside, it's hands down one of the most beautiful planes ever built
It’s a beautiful brute, no doubt about it, and can manoeuvre very well. I think it’s outdated in terms of its capabilities in electronic warfare so well trained pilots are needed to maximise its potential.
which do not exist
Well they aren't as outdated as people think either, they have an integrated EW suite, those pilons at the tip of the wings are arrays used in ECM and jamming. Although the radar uses PESA technology, it has been further developed so it's much more modern than the 90s PESA radars. It has a modern IRST, RWR and MAW systems. Fully fly by wire. It doesn't lack in much.
It's always great to see all sides agreeing how incredible the su-35 is, you don't see that often
Gotta love the capability of a fast jet fitted with a GPS system designed for hiking
lol
Facts😂
🎉
😂😂😂
Also muppt comments like yours 🤦
SU-35 is a sweet bird, like the TU-160
30+ SU-35s already shot down in Ukraine. Its just another soviet scrap metal. Ukrainians destroy SU-35 easy.
Lmao
Yeah some good looking planes
Come sei poetico .😊😊😊
Never underestimate your enemy nor their weapons
When it comes to russia it seems we have overestimated them
@@TheLev11most people have severely done so.
@@TheLev11 it debend in whitch sfers
@@TheLev11why? Never believe what media tell you. You dont know for what they prepare you.
@MrIceColdM I don't need media to tell me about how pathetic russia is, I've got family fighting for ukraine to tell me that. But please, if not the media then who do I believe? You? A guy sitting behind a computer who has no idea of what is going on in the world? Sure
This is the most beautiful aircraft ever produced anywhere in the world. Also it is one of the most advanced and capable fighter planes in the world and just about unrivalled by any NATO or United States planes.
Well done Sukhoi, this is human technology and engineering at its absolute finest. 👏👏👏👌
😂😂😂
wrong its the most beautiful aircraft produce in anywhere in the universe. Unrivalled by any alien spacecraft. So good it was shot down over Ukraine last year. lol
@@ThePonster64And The Phillipines Shot Down A F22 Whats Your Point!
@@KenanVonKaiser no it didn't and if you believe that a simulation exercise is real life i have a bridge to sell you. Fact - as of right now, the F22 has never been shot down.
@@KenanVonKaiser
Where did you hear that, on CNN?
No F22 has ever been "Shot Down" except in war games.
The French claimed the Rafale could easily shoot down the F22, but they certainly don't want to put that to the test.
The Philippine Military claimed they COULD bring down an F22 with a Russian built anti-aircraft missile system, but since they are considered an ally, I don't think it would be prudent for them to actually try it.
There's always claims of foreign country's equipment being better than the US, but no one has proved it yet.
An interesting fact about the flankers, they were always the first on air patrol and the last to vacate the airspace...only once their mission was completed, or they were cleared to RTB. They could loiter for some time before been cleared in hot too. Awesome looking jets.
With the technological advancements currently employed by other countries it is unlikely that there would be need to get into a dogfight at all. Not to take away the fact that the su-35 is an impressive piece of machinery.
Yeah that cobra manoeuvre looks really bloody impressive, of course it scrubs off all your airspeed and leaves you a sitting duck for anyone else in the area. Looks amazing at airshows though.
AIM-9X 50G turn goes brrrrrt
another yt intelligence not knowing what cobras are for lmao. it is to force an overshoot, putting yourself in a position where your enemy cant fire anything at you, even a high off bore sight. cobras are not meant to be deliberately pulled in the wrong situation just so that your scenario plays out
@@user-xj9lp3fs7m "anyone else in the area"
If theres a dogfight happening you already are a sitting duck for anyone else so a cobra or other advanced manouvers which bleed speed are only beneficial if done at a right time
@@pd28cat again, cobras are not deliberately pulled when there are other people in the area, at least not when others are on your 6. an f15/16/18 would be able to do less when there are bandits on its 6 as well
Absolutely beautiful aircraft
RCS has entered the chat
you guys think stealth makes a fighter invisible?? then you should know about the Modern IRST Sensors can track 5th gen aircrafts, so basically 4.5th gen fighters like JAS39,Su35,Rafale,Typhoon can go against 5th gen making odds of suitability close to equal
@@wanniachchigerumeththenuja5075 you think stealth is only about radar? The exhaust nozzles of 5th gen fighters are specifically designed to remain as cold on the outside as possible, as well as shielding the hot flame to decrease the angle from which it can be picked up
Fancy thrust vectoring nozzles on Russian fighters, due to this (rather useless) capability basically do the opposite of that
also, IRST is limited by range compared to radar AFAIK, meaning it would typically be limited to getting shots on planes within visual range in instances where your radar cannot pick up the target.
@@antonikubiak5798 That's for reducing Infrared signature, not radar cross section. And that feature is only on the F-35, which is only helpful when being picked up by SAMs or MANPADS when flying low or avoiding Fox-2 missiles in the merge. F-22 only has that flattened exhaust nozzle to reduce RCS, not for IR.
It isn't about the plane. It is about the pilot.
Fun fact: this aircraft is actually nicknamed "Decepticon", as well as the Su-57 which it shares its avionics with, basically a gen 5 fighter jet with an Su-27 skeleton. An SRT/AMG version of a Flanker, if you want.
_It's very deadly until it isn't_
Because the F-35s radar knows where it is, it knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, it obtains a difference, or deviation. By the time the SU-35s radar knows where the F-35 was, but now isn't, it's whole squadron is already long gone due to an Aim-120 and the small radar cross section of the F-35
Damn Yankee chill not everything is a pissrace
@@icy3721 you didn't get the joke
@@Anton-cg7og the meme’s overused anyways idc
@@icy3721 Can I just say I love that term. Lol 😂
Yanks! I miss it!
Stfu fool , by the time the f35 goes against Russia it’ll be the new fleet of felons . Yeah nebo m radar picks up stealth easy , like 1,000km away , then all russia military knows where they are .
That is one beautiful fighter jet!
No way, you're a girl?
@@thethreestrikes3951 Yup!
@@girlfriday1299 You got an IG? Please
@@thethreestrikes3951 No way you're trynna get a girl's IG on youtube shorts 😭😭
@@scourge8186 yep, I got no other choice brah 💀
Also it has thermal camera in front for the aircraft to detect other aircraft without activating the radar and without the other aircraft noticing hes being detected
That plane is Beautiful. I piece of art. Something about its lines.
God bless.
bless who? russians?
@@Anton-dl7me
You.
@@Anton-dl7mewhy not?
@@hercegovac9999 because they are killers and liars who seeded chaos. It was their initiative to perform this "quick victorious war"
This is one beautiful jet
So dangerous that even apartment blocks are not safe from it.
…particularly the ones occupied by Ukrainian snipers at work.
I mean I agree with you in the terms that it is dogshit but wasn't it a su34?
Personally I love mig29 upg and su30 mki
But yes su35 is a beast indeed
never underestinate a plane that has been grounded due to lack of spare parts since sanctions 😄🤣
What sanctions? Last I know you guys pleading for cheaper gas because of your imposed sanction!
@@slothypunk first time i have heard about it.
Also , gass price is now lower than in jan 22.
So , cope harder russiam bot simp
@@murderouskitten2577 How is it coping? You westerner shoot yourself on your feet by imposed sanction and blame Russian because they don't do what you ask? If anything you are the one who cope and being a crapwad everywhere you go! Afghanistan, Vietnam, Africa, Iraq, all just crashed beyond repair after you touched it! It took decades for Vietnam to get out of your crapstorm and rebuild and it still crap!
@@murderouskitten2577are you really this pissed off? + have you forgotten of how many times the westerns have been trying to steal Russian (USSR)’s techs? Such as mig 21 and mil mi 24 hind? Also not the Russian techs but German techs too such as jet engineer which led to USA to have more improved techs for their fighter jets and their space missions during the Cold War and another thing which trying to copy the legendary mg42 by creating the same methods on the M60, so please think before crying out here like any western child would do. 😅
Very impressive. Exactly how many of these are currently operational?
My question also. Having 17 super jets doesn’t get you very far.
157 produced
Many sold
Ruff estimate is 99
@@johntheclyde2816 that's for the su57 not the su35
How many of them already have been shot down?
@@paulusradomski Confirmed pictures show two
I like more the aesthetics of the Su-33 because of the canards, that makes it look more menacing or futuristic
But its not futuristic.
Su 34 dack
The SU-35 is exactly what a fighter jet should look like.
This plane joined art class, don't let it fail it..
China have J20s yet still bought Su35, you knew how good it is.
The Chinese tried to reverse-engineer Soviet engines. They failed so they had to work with inferior homegrown engines.
Su-35 is good, and can do good stuff. There I saved you 1 min.
I heard it would make great scrap metal in Ukraine.
@@PeeFunk2008 Really? Only two Su-35’s have been shot down over Ukraine, confirmed via photos, in the past year. Losing only two of your finest aircraft in a war that’s lasted over a year sounds like a really good trade off.
I heard when an F-16 fighter sees SU-35 in his rear mirror, he usually pees into his jump suit.
The SU's are such beautiful aircrafts....
So... It has all the kit western jets had in the late 90's/early 00's
And the badass pilots who have the skills, courage and confidence.
@@davidcheung8595 how? With much less frame, engine time and an outdated radar system rofl. Russia is no longer USSR, no top tier aerospace engineer wanna work for government for 14k usd a year
@Renegade I doubt that with late generations, I have been studied master of engineer in Germany and met a lot of talented Russian with their excellent verbal skill. Many of them can find a job later in an international corporation. Russia government cannot pay dirt cheap salaries to young engineers any more since they have language skills and are familiar with international standards.
@@stevep5372 Steve, courage can not be trained, confidence does not come from money, otherwise, those Russians would not have defeat Nazi Germany in WW2.
The MQ9 story is just another example.
@@davidcheung8595 are you joking right? Do you know how many Soviet soldiers fall for one German Nazi killed? I respected world war ii soviet soldier, but not these 2022 Russo soldiers massacre rape looters. Mq9 is a uav, Russia fighter jets didn’t win a single combat against American jets for 50 years. Finally show the confidence courage to Moskva cruiser naval, lmaooo
Better hope we don't run into the 4 in service and the 2 that are flight worthy
And the fact their pilots are under trained and also they are pulling flight instuctors in to go to the Ukraine war. A aircraft is only good as the person flying it and their pilots aren't that well trained nor do they have enough flight hours under their belts.
Russia has like 200.
@@Jabba1625 Lies
@Elias Ziad the USA alone has almost 200 f22 and God knows how many of various much better aircraft with much better pilots.
@@anobody7467 with a balloon being the only kill in more than 20 years.
They're all more dangerous than we think, the question is, how dangerous are they to each other.
Also the prettiest dual engines fighter jet
No amount of dogfighting is gonna save you from superior BVR lmao
Yeah, No Stealth will save you either.
@@teotheterrible The F-35 is more difficult to detect on BVR than any Russian plane, so yes it will
@ bro remember F-117 was shot down by a s200 so the moment it opens its bay doors to fire Weapons it is already revealing itself
@@Trickster602 So you are telling me that stealth is worthless because *one* stealth fighter got fired at *after* it removed its stealth by opening its bay, until that point being invisible to both aircraft and *considerably* more powerful ground radars? Plus, when I say BVR, I mean it, you can't engage an F-35 at its maximum range of engagement against any aircraft or AAA currently in service in the world because you can't trace it for long enough. You'd have to go pitbull and pray your missile finds something that is already cold going back to base. Modern AAA installations are designed around shooting down the missiles because they know (even the Russians know this) that they can't shoot down modern hostile stealth fighters but they have a chance to shoot down the (also stealth but approaching AKA becoming bigger in radar) missiles. But you know better than every military in the world because of one anecdote? LMAO
@ No I am not saying that look now a days the advanced radars can literally detect even the stealths.Yoy may manage to fire the first missile and get a kill but the moment you fire you are revealing yourself
This thing looks like a flying cat💀
US always announced there weapon is best
But they will never give credits to the Russian and European Fighter jets
its an arms race so every side will try to match their opponents and will declare their's the best.
Dog fighting is old school. The US design is stealth and long range missiles. Close combat dog fighting is rare to non-existent.
Lee Fury
If dog fighting is old school the what good is thrust vectoring on the US F 22 ?
@@hellkat2285 You're. not up to date. The reports are the next generation won't include it. The YF-23 didn't have it and if they had held to the original design requirements, it would have been chosen over the F-22. Long range is the primary game, not dog fighting.
it can be unpredictable though
@@bobbyschannel349 Agreed but from what I've read, vector thrusting uses a lot of fuel. I was very upset that they change their rules in the. middle of the showdown between YF-23 and YF-22. It wouldn't surprise me that someone leaked it to the YF-22 team while the YF-23 design was by then unable to use VT as it's primary goal (the original design parameters given to each consortium) was stealth and fuel economy achieving mach speed w/o afterburners. Even to this day many believe the YF-23 was the better plane. Even Japan thinks so as rumors are it wants to resurrect it for their AF.
"US design"...?? Well...Russian "design" is "we see everything/stealth does not exist for us(long range, low frequency radars and not only), "we put three(3!!!) Radars on our planes) and we have the best long range/high velocity/battle proven missiles(R73)!!"
All "designs" are going to be tested soon in the skies of Ukraine!
Mexico 🇲🇽 needs 20 of those
Mexico need a slap on the a$s from US
@@ClA_AGENT I will like to see you try :)
you really needed to say that
@@LeSatan yep I don’t eat your Ukraine show 😅
Well in couple of months you will not need them as US is going down anyway :)
F16 for life I just love it
Off topic, I'm now going to listen to my uncontrollable urge to throw cheese on different aircraft. Wish me luck
Its more dangerous than you think, because you never know when some component will fall off of a Russian plane & bonk you in the head.
Yeah... no
You have achieved comedy
Not as dangerous as the a10, if its on your side though
Still not as dangerous as f-35, which engine can randomly fail when switching flying modes
@@georgefenrirbitadze4757
That’s funny considering Russian planes fall to the ground before even making it to the battlefield XD
Russian pilots trying their best to not ram their 1 million dollar aircraft into a US aircraft challenge (impossible) :
$1 million? Try $50 million, less for a flanker but SU-35 is not a cheap plane to produce!
1mil? lmao what world are you living in?
@@maclain728 That just makes it 50 times worse. 💀
dude,really?1 million dollar is very cheap for fighter jet..fighter jet in this class would be cost at least $50m n above
@@mark_dauzyou can buy a Mig-21 for cheaper then a Lamboghini
Flightworthy too
The front on view of that jet is the sexiest jet in the air!
Is it just me or does the SU 35 give off an F-14 Tomcat vibe in terms of general design or silhouette in some angles?
It is the most beautiful aircraft ever made in my opinion!
its so advance and badass that ukraine shot it down like nothing
Where is the proof that Ukraine shot it down? Don't talk out of your ass.
Source -BBC and CNN
@@IlPinnacolo Almost as bad Putin killing his own people
@@IlPinnacolobro using uno reverse 💀
Only 2 and with man pads and all there other nato junk
Say it like it is. The Su-35 is the most agile fighter jet to exist.
There's one sentence that doesn't make sense really. And that is that the airframe is through it's thrust vectoring capable of maintaining stability at high speeds during aerial combat. In my opinion it should be the airframe is through it's thrust vectoring capable of maintaining high stability at LOW speeds during aerial combat scenarios. As really, dogfights usually happen at extremely low speed and whose airframe maintains superior nose authority usually wins.
Well, you can employ thrust vectoring to control your aircraft at high speeds as well. And it may be beneficial if you don't deflect control surfaces resulting in huge surplus drag at those (supersonic) speeds. So the sentence doesn't look like a complete nonsense to me
Some topgun fan talking ab dogfights again lol. Wvr never really work anymore due to superior radars, sam missiles capable of chilling in the beach and still killing you 50km away. Wvr is so risky in this age that none is engaging it
@@hehe-jg8zz Did you notice that your point is out of the topic discussed and, hence, totally irrelevant? As they used to put it, «В огороде бузина, а в Киеве - дядька»
@@gaHuJIa_Macmep idc, i comment what i want. And also, he mentions dogfights so IT is in a topic
@@hehe-jg8zz yeah, I see, you don't care. This is right: you just don't care how you look and what people will think about your adequacy. Well...
The Su-27/Su-30 series are the most beautiful fighters in the world.
Nothing beats the American Boombonic Bambarola.
How is this dangerous and it never went up against any worthy opponents in the sky
After 40 years the F15 Eagle Still the strongest and ready to kick Russian fighter ass every time.. ✌️
Yea. Nothing can beat F-15. They say it doesn’t even need its flaps to takeoff
freindly reminder that the Eagle got atleast 90% of it's kills against atleast 20 years older jets flown by undertrained pilots from third world air forces =)
buddy youre delusional. just because the f15 did well on a battlefield scenario decades ago against extremely undertrained pilots and inferior 3rd gens, it doesnt mean that it'll do as good against a gen 4++ in a 2023 battlefield scenario
These planes never met in battle so we don't know that.
@773. The F-15 locked onto a MiG 25. Never lost a dogfight. Has a top speed of Mach 2.5. And still one of the most capable fighters
The prettiest jet of all time
It ain’t more dangerous than a Ukrainian with a drone, I promise you that💀💀
J-16 overtook Su-35....
LOLOL What? SU-35E has forward and rear-facing Phazotron radar system capable of simultaneous tracking of 24 targets up to 62 miles (100km) away (over uneven terrain).
Its cockpit design contains a colour CRT display as well as HUD (Head-Up Display) along with digital fly-by-wire (FBW) capability (with quadruple redundancy) - the onboard computers able to find four different ways to achieve the desired combat results.
Avionics include an Irbis-E passive phased array radar system. The Su-35 is classified a "4++ Generation Fighter" though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts, while only falling short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation by its lack of stealth.
However, the Su35s tactical value has broadened considerably.
@@hotstepper887 wow... never realised PESA radar is better than AESA radar.... 🤣🤣🤣
@@fatdoi003 Oh dear... OK... So what field of view (FOV) do you get from an AESA? It's about 90 - 110 degrees.
PESA radar system delay certain signals and can be controlled electronically, meaning the signal can be steered quickly and precisely (without moving any of the antennas). They are highly valuable because they can scan large areas much faster. (which is why it's used).
But have you know common sense either? If the AESA could achieve what the SU-35 desires from its radar, OBVIOUSLY Russia would use it.
The major difference between an AESA and PESA radar is the number of transmitters.
A PESA system relies on one large transmitter, while AESA systems have multiple TRMs - This allows for greater reliability, smaller size and weight, and a lower threat of being detected due to the use of multiple frequencies.
Both systems are used in the military, the relevant differences between a PESA radar vs. an AESA radar will likely depend on what it's being used to do.
What you have just proven, though (with your very own words) is your very own complete misunderstanding of each radar's advantages and disadvantages for its particular role. You've just proven you have an understanding of military aircraft equivalent to that of a 4-year-old.
Try learning before always looking to attack something you doln't understand.
What you've said made me laugh out loud, as you fail to understand the Irbis E ESA radar is the most powerful in its class, or that it increases it’s BVR combat range as well as it's countermeasures resistance. (being the entire point of the hardware).
But not only that, you know so little, you didn't even know the Phazotron Zhuk in the Flanker is an AESA - AE/ASE radar and when used with existing Russian transmit receive module technology delivers around 60 percent higher raw power aperture performance compared to US APG-79 (F/A-18E/F BII) and APG-81 (JSF) class radars.
The Su-35 is classified a"4++ Generation Fighter" though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts, while only falling short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation by its lack of stealth, but as shown the Su35s tactical value has broadened considerably.
And don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking the J-16 it's another of my favourite aircraft, Flankers always have been, but we see so little of it, much we need to guess.
It can't even compete with the F-15.
Let alone the F-15EX or the F-35 or F-22.
US F-15 pilots humiliated it BVR, WVR and the F-22 did engaged it in dog fight over Syria.
*Least biased kid*
@@jorgenitales1882 it's been proving during exercises with the Indian SU30MKI.
bro delusional asf 😂 man as an f16 fan myself, im at least smart enough to say thay the su35 is better than the f16. now youre telling me that f15 is better than su35 lmao
@@f-16viper99 it's not even close.
Both the F-15 and the F-16 would kill it before it could target them in BVR.
In a dog fight with the aim 9X. Coupled with helmet mouted sight it's not even close.
They will kill it before making a single turn.
@@Milvus_In_Excelsis i can tell youve never flown anything before
a clean f15 has an rcs of 25m^2 while a clean f16 has 5m^2 (both without fuel tanks, IRST pods, EOS pods, etc). compared to a clean su35 at 1m^2 (already with IRST, EOS, etc)
a su35 can target a plane with an rcs of 3m^2 from 350km away, an rcs of +5m^2 from 400km away. this outranges both the radars of f15 and f16 (
A thousand times better than a f16 fighter
i don't care what's it's combat capabilities are i just want to have it because its beautiful
They are so special, you won't see them in Ukraine because Russia doesn't want them littering the farm fields as wreckage along with their other advanced equipment.
Cope harder
Lol russia has been using them since the beginning of the war, but whatever, cope harder
They are being used that is why Ukraine's airforce is already about non-existent
@Toni 945 That's why Russia won't fly their Su57 over Ukraine their afraid they will be shot down. Cope harder 🤣
@@twinbee13monsterhunter su57 has been confirmed to have been used in ukraine. Atleast 1 su57 has been used in the territory of ukraine, conducting air and ground strikes. Search it up yourself 😉
it's also less dangerous than you think because the future is stealth and beyond-visual-range combat
Mostly all 4th gen, to be honest im sure all of them are Bvr capable and this thing has very good missile especially the axehead - mach 6 capable
stealth aircraft is way expensive so 4th gen fighter is good and low cost
Great engineering is great engineering and there are some beautiful and capable jets out there.
I have always thought that these fighter jets resemble the US F-15 Eagle.
No, they don't.
Probably the best fighter jet in the world.
It also has about 10 times the radar signature of an F-35 lmao
su35 is not a stealth aircraft
@@simen6637 a stealth aircraft with 10 times less radar signature than a non stealth aircraft, how embarassing.
@@Ebbsy08 yea that's kinda the point.. a stealth aircraft like f35 is trying to have less of a radar signature.. su35 is not trying to stay off radars.. they sacriffce it for better mobility and in combo with way better trust vectoring the su35 is a way more agile aircraft. They both good at different things.. The f35 however is not much stealthy in combat at all and there are many air defence systems that can engage the almost new 35. The f35 has nothing but problems, been exported everywhere and hacked by china, also turkey share the data on it with russia.. f35 is a hype and money sink
but has an rcs 25x smaller than an f15 tho
And as soon as that f35 banks, that radar signature spikes like a mf. How likely do you think these two aircraft are actually going to be nose to nose? Cause for sure that's not how an intercept works.
The real question is, how much longer can these planes fly?
Considering their age and active flight activity these bad boys have to closing in on those big end of service numbers.
Unless you have no parts to fix it after sanctions 😅😂
Can I say something Russian fighter are always superior and have a leading edge then American jets . Even American kidnapped Russian jets to reverse engineer to get there technology
Kidnap?😂 The pilot was a traitor.
He defected.
Yes, CIA organized this and Viktor Ivanovich Belenko on September 6, 1976 defected by flying his MIG-25P from Far East of SSSR to Hakodate Airport in Hokkaido Japan. Americans hold this plane for full month and then returned it back.
Russia is literally 2 generations behind
US are now starting to build 6th gen aircrafts
Every former Soviet block aircraft acquired by the west left western engineers amazed... at just how inferior they were and how their capabilities had been vastly overestimated.
In which other multiverse ?
Beautiful big bird ❤
It really is!
If I can see your fan blades, you're gone.
Dont underestimate the 35s be it the have an SU or an F xD
Any modern fighter is not better than it radar, link and missiles. And.. well.. su35 may maneuver well, in those 3 categories.... its performance is not stellar.
They're not comparable, they're in different leagues entirely and the SU 57 is meant to be the competetor to the F 35.
@@lordcrafty7578 the 57 ain’t close to the F-35
@@besh7408 that's definitely what I'm betting on given the state of projects like the T-14 armata tank but I don't know much about the SU-57. I'm at least somewhat sceptical about its actual stealth capabilities and whether or not it really is a 5th generation fighter. If you know any good information sources on it then do share.
@@besh7408 Why people that understand nothing, should learn first. -
besh
10 hours ago (edited)
@Lordcrafty the 57 ain’t close to the F-35.
That's not only wrong, but it could not be further from the truth. I could just ask you what you've ever seen the F-22 do (other than flying over a beach on a UA-cam Video)? That would allow you to make that claim, and to hold that opinion? Right?
So, all you prove, is, that you're basing your own opinion on a whole lot of nothing, right? Do you understand that?
So, what is it all about? It's embarrassing!
But now, start to understand how these aircraft operate. Learn what they're good at, what real abilities it has in today world, what it's weaknesses are as well as its strengths. And how vulnerable they in a war scenario.
You then need to do the same with the aircraft you're comparing it with.
Like simple things like this? Stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection.
But it does NOT defeat low-frequency (long wave), radar.
That would lead you to ask yourself how can either the F-22 nor the F-35, detect, track, or target any other stealth aircraft from BVR (beyond visual range)?
And now we start digging out the reality, truth, and the facts.
To detect, track, and target other stealth aircraft from BVR, you must have long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
Well, clearly, neither the APG-77 radar, used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar, used in the F-35, can detect any other stealth aircraft from BVR, an obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of.
Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, let's think about this logically and honestly (for once)? How can anyone see these US stealth fighter aircraft as any real threat to either Russia or China, (who both have these US stealth aircraft technically beaten today)?
They can detect, track, and target the US stealth jets from BVR, yet the US stealth jets can't even detect them from BVR? Result = A pretty obvious one.
And this is exactly why we should never just assume anything, or ever try to run others down. I mean, what do think that could ever achieve?
Now, on the other hand, the reality of this "Russian rubbish" you all claim, is that they do have a real 5th generation radar, with enhanced long-wave radar, their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57.
Russia have designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings.
The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian elbrus computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, meaning it can detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
So the reality today is, very clear, this new Russian technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
Russian rubbish indeed.
They interact in ''real-time'' with each squadron member (auto selecting) the best placed BVR missile being carried by any of them, that can be fired by anyone of them.
They can take full control of surface-to-air (SAM) missile defence systems - (that alone is lethal), and they can detect, track, and target all enemy stealth fighters, (and detect them long before they even enter Russian airspace), from much greater distances today, with the "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system.
The truth today is obvious, it could not be any more obvious, these Russian stealth jets will always know exactly where the enemy stealth fighter aircraft are, so they'll always approach them head on, stealthily, being able to down the US stealth jets from BVR (while the US stealth fighter jets would not even detect them coming)! Result, and the all important reality is? = you're doomed!
The Byelka (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targetting, and also for jamming (over large areas).
It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57.
Russia also tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's.
Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35, as although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, and targeted from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, and target the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important Russian advantage in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
This 5th generation radar design, has a very clear and real potential to provide a genuine shared multifunction aperture, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy -missile mid-course guidance against low signature aircraft - identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas.
(Effectively, neutralising the USA's use of AWACS for their detection).
The truth is, this Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Just Russian crap, indeed.
Sukhoi Su30MKI's are total next level.
How?
@@antiwokehuman SU 30 MKI is a upgraded version of SU 30 itself but as capable as SU 35
It was specially designed for Indian Air Force
What about SU 30 SM?
That's why India canceled their Su-57 orders.
@@konekillerking No, the real reason was that the SU 57 was taking too much time in development and didn't match the expectations so, we started making our own 5th gen fighter
After Egypt bought French Rafale fighters, they used them against their Russian Su-35s. The Rafales successfully jammed the Su-35s, which blinded them. The Rafales then (simulated) shot the Russian jets down.
It's not only about speed and maneuverability.
Egypt was so impressed with the Rafale that they ordered 30 more for a total of 54.
I think this is one of the best looking planes to ever fly
F22 has entered the chat…
The balloon killer
F22 is just a trash compared to su 35.
The F-22 entered the chat, splashed five and then left the chat without the Russians ever knowing.
F-22 bailed - ran out of chaff
Su-57 joined the chat....
My Country Iran Bought 26 Su-35s 🇮🇷🇷🇺
Iran now won't be bullied anymore for a weak airforce
Go iran 🇮🇷
We stand with you against the zionists 🇱🇧 ❤️ 🇮🇷
@@ddarkon1223
Shokran Ya Akhi
Tohia Lebnan Ve Shab Al Aziz al Lebnan
🇮🇷🤝🇱🇧
@@OshinAttari Walaw Tekram
Lady killers unite 😭
Uraaaa
I know the answer to why it's more dangerous than we think! It's because it's easy to shoot down, and it can crash into civilian homes and buildings. It can also break down and fall out of the sky, killing the pilot and crashing into civilians and their homes.
Yes, like the drones RU prefers Kamikaze planes.
Russia's equipment are so much more advanced.
The Su-57 looks like the Su-35 with a new color coat on.
Russian aviation technology is superior.
not on stealth though
@@user-xj9lp3fs7m cause it's not their doctrine, they prefer a defensive doctrine instead of an agresiva doctrine, thats how their armies work too.
@@user-xj9lp3fs7mthey dint need stealth
@@jorgenitales1882 then why would russia be focusing so much to make their su57 stealth?
Try 25 years behind the US.
It also uses composite materials extensively (for weight & RCS reduction) and electronic warfare.
None of that matters without a well trained pilot!
I like Russia's fighter jets. They need to drop this war stuff and build performance jets.
The Russian Air Force has over 600+ of these bad boys there like a mix of the F-16V 🐍 Multirole Fighter and the F-15 Strike eagle 🦅
This video is as long as it takes a manpad to shoot these out of the sky.
Just a shame that the MiG 29, the Su 27 and the Su 35 all seem to use the same design. It seems like both design bureaus worked from the same blueprints. Of course with the MiG 21 and the Su 7/9/11 range also using similar designs, this seems to be something of a staple for Soviet/Russian aircraft designs. I wished they had had a bit more variation in their designs.
Air-superiority fighter but the Russians are using them for ground attack in Ukraine. 1 has been shot down because of flying too low
I saw the pictures of that jet, it wasn't su-35, probably 27, might have been even ukrainian.
@@viceguy4880 to date russia has lost confirmed 2 su-35 likely more unconfirmed.
@@fennoman9241 Confirmed by who? Ukrainian officials? Well, I won't be surprised if they gonna claim that they have shot down dozens of russian satellites.
An air-superiority fighter... that can still get shot down by a downgraded export model Mig-29 built 40 years ago. It's a jet, and a jet fighter, superiority is probably a bit of a stretch though.
@@tehScribbles Ummmm no Mig-29s have ever shot down the Su-35. Read your sources again, it was shot down not by a Mig but by a surface-to-air missile of the Ukrainian air defences near Kakhovka
Because his little brother Su-27 can just fart and down the $32 million dollars US Reaper drone without firing a single shot !!! 🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
The fact that a Su-27 had to resort to a borderline kamikazi attack to down something due to an inability to use weapons isn’t something to brag about. I’d be ashamed if our jets had to resort to ramming due to issues with supply and ordnance.
And the drone was unarmed
@@mrnoskills3589 like when that p-63 went into the b-17?
@@_BoogerFinger_ You do understand an accident at an airshow is far different than an actual kamikazi attack during a real intercept, right?
@@mrnoskills3589 you do understand that they were not using weapons so as to not blow it to smithereens. They wanted it as intact as possible so it can be studied and counters may be deployed against US technology
I’ll stick with the A-10 as the sexiest beast out there!
Bruh
Su-35 it's a much better aircraft, than any version of F-15.
The SU-35 lacks numbers but the Russian dedicate a lot to their chosen select few privileged. Unfortunately poor leadership will put these few highly trained masters of air to air combat in terrible situations and waste their potential. Long story short logistics, information, and determination can win with slightly less performance. But then the US has all of that plus F-22 Raptors and whatever the hell else we got lmao
Didn't your f35 got shot down by a 60s SAM "Oh BuT iT wAs A BiRd StRiKe" so much for being a 5th gen LMAOOO 💀
@@Anonymous-nc7eo bruh I can can feel the emotional damage seeping from your comment. Cope
@@nerothoth5339 haha don't be sad for your "5th gen" muricana trash. Keep crying💀
doesnt lack numbers, 127 built arent lacking at all, also, the "air to air" combat you're talking about ended in the F14 vs MiG21 era, now its all BVR and datalink.
@@TOx1CC127 is not a lot when the competition is America. And now that the future is all “bvr&data link” this reduces Russia’s advantage even more with their only advantage being slightly more maneuverable aircraft when dogfights will rarely happen with these next gen long rang missiles. Plus with all of the stealth the us invested in it won’t matter how great Russian missile and radar are when they can’t get a solid lock due to stealth and electronic warfare 🦅🦅
...on paper
lmao keep believing that kid
TLDR:
russia made a handful of jet-kife fighters while the US is making thousands of jet-snipers
*sticks GPS mount to dash board for navigation*
......or for disinfo?
@@jackd1582 lol then why are there photos of these fighter planes with a Garmin mounted to the dashboard. In Ukraine RIGHT NOW, SHOT DOWN BURNING
The best part is the GPS system that they use, is OURS that's why their missiles don't track from their ships because their OS was American owned that they pay us to use, but since the outbreak of war USA has shut that shit off. & Nothing tracks & they don't know where they are.
Sucks to be a Wrong, Tyrant, Nazi Bitch Ass Commie.
America has like 700+ 5th gen aircraft.
Them commies MIGHT have 25 airworthy 5 gen airframes.
WE ARE THE RUST UPON THEIR GEARS.
We built the airplane in the 60's that they COULDNT shoot down in the 90's