The late Roman soldier

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
  • Exposition of the weapons and clothes of a Roman soldier of the 4th century - in Italian with English subtitles
    Albano - Legio II Parthica Severiana

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @RestitutorEuropa
    @RestitutorEuropa 3 роки тому +94

    It’s cool how the stereotypical imperial legionary slowly involved into the medieval soldiers of the Middle Ages over time.

    • @romatardoimperiale
      @romatardoimperiale 3 роки тому +10

      Not sure we could call it "involution": they adapted to the changed circumstances

    • @prs_81
      @prs_81 3 роки тому +14

      @@romatardoimperiale he meant "evolution". They did evolve.

    • @romatardoimperiale
      @romatardoimperiale 3 роки тому +2

      @@prs_81 maybe, but I can answer to what he says, not what he thought :)

    • @SonKunSama
      @SonKunSama 3 роки тому +5

      I'm sure the Romans were involved in the evolution of armor.

  • @David-lu4gq
    @David-lu4gq 3 роки тому +67

    At 7:58 the centurion is saying, "This legionary is giving too much information to the enemies of Rome. Inform the Imperator immediately". 😂

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +15

      The guy in red disappeared after the presentation, we do not know why :D

    • @CHRF-55457
      @CHRF-55457 3 роки тому

      lol.

    • @eurasiaacaci.-110
      @eurasiaacaci.-110 3 роки тому +2

      @@furiotogio well he’s probably be promoted into the gladiator school

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +3

      @@eurasiaacaci.-110 not sure that would count as a promotion :D

    • @StrategosAmoros
      @StrategosAmoros 2 роки тому +1

      @@furiotogio You got to sugar coat things to get things on the way. Like trying to convince a kid to get into a white van with candy but insteads gets the you know what.

  • @Gracz87
    @Gracz87 5 років тому +23

    Grazie! More video about Late Roman army per favore.

  • @crossetler_2184
    @crossetler_2184 5 років тому +11

    Muito interessante e didático! A diferença entre as épocas de fato surpreende. Gostaria muito que houvessem mais reconstituições com atores de uma legião do Império Tardio, não apenas entre estudiosos como também nas artes. Parabéns!

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      Grazie! Se ti interessa, prova a seguire il mio gruppo, Custodes Urbis:
      www.suodales.com/custodes-urbis/
      facebook.com/custodesurbis/

  • @lusolad
    @lusolad 4 роки тому +10

    Pretty good presentation. Thank you.

  • @Kazii_CSclips
    @Kazii_CSclips 3 роки тому +8

    Sad that he couldn't mention Rome's reliance on more Cavalry rather Infantry in the later times, It would've been a treat to see Cataphractarii or the Bucellarii

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +2

      I do not agree on this presumed reliance on cavalry rather than on infantry, why do you believe it?

    • @Kazii_CSclips
      @Kazii_CSclips 3 роки тому +1

      @@furiotogio I think I have to give the Byzantine Empire credit but during the Flavian Period, Rome relied more on the Alae, a group of Auxiliary Horse cavalry from Iberia, some Germans, Thrace, and especially Gallic Cavalry were useful. This was because Rome couldn't expand its territory any longer so it had to patrol its borders and quell any invasion or small rebellion immediately.
      We then move to the time of Belisarius and Emperor Justinian where the Byzantines had to adapt their Cavalry to rely on fast and effective Horse Archers (like the Huns) as well as flexible Infantry, during the time of Emperor Justinian's restoration of the Empire, its cavalry force was effective on taking back and defending the city of Rome from the Goths.

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      @@Kazii_CSclips on Belisarius I agree, but he is a couple of centuries later than the army spoken of in the video. And while I agree that cavalry was important, at the beginning of the 4th century infantry was still the Queen of the battles :)

  • @benjamindover2601
    @benjamindover2601 3 роки тому +6

    Chunkyus Maximus.

  • @semiautothanoscar9612
    @semiautothanoscar9612 6 років тому +7

    Holy Shit! This Guy's Latin is So Fucking Amazing

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +2

      Native speaker!

    • @kmaher1424
      @kmaher1424 3 роки тому

      Evolved Latin!

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому

      @@kmaher1424 Indeed!

    • @greenlandabuji7263
      @greenlandabuji7263 3 роки тому

      Don't use the name of the Lord in vain God bless you 🙏

    • @kmaher1424
      @kmaher1424 3 роки тому +2

      @@greenlandabuji7263 "Holy shit" is scatology, not profanity.
      Unless you worship excrement.

  • @1dravano
    @1dravano 5 років тому +2

    4:37 "its the final countdown...""You chopped of my f$#K#$# fingers"-Job Bluth

    • @1dravano
      @1dravano 5 років тому

      being in late roman studies now its a helpful video thank you

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  5 років тому

      you are welcome, @@1dravano

  • @zacstuart3861
    @zacstuart3861 4 роки тому +5

    Who or which company made the fine late Roman uniform? I cannot find any replicas of the uniform anywhere; let alone shoes, the pants and belt. Any information will be helpful.

    • @laniquify
      @laniquify 4 роки тому +3

      Zac Stuart medievaldesign.com

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +2

      Check medievaldesign.com they have tunic, pants, shoes and (at least one type of) belt

  • @agenthunk5070
    @agenthunk5070 3 роки тому +2

    I have a question,sir.
    Do you have actual uniforms/imperial equipment for units of the Herculiani Seniores,Cornuti Seniores,Scholae Palatinae and Scholae Gentiles, Calvary and Heavy Infantry units as well as the Ravenna Elite Ballistarii units for Re-enactment personal you can do for a recording and post it on youtube in future?
    I would like to see what they actually look like for real as opposed to the Attila total war game...
    I am interested in the time period of the 5th Century and the units that were fielded during this time when Attila was a menace...

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      I re-create an auxilium palatinum at the beginning of the 4th century, so my clothes and my equipment is a bit outdated with respect to the period you are mentioning, but the overall impression is definitely similar. You can check our Facebook page to see more reconstructions: facebook.com/custodesurbis

    • @agenthunk5070
      @agenthunk5070 3 роки тому

      @@furiotogio is there other groups that have 5th century western rome uniforms,equipment and does reneactments?
      A question from outside italy from ,america..
      Is all the roman military doctrine,clothing,customs uniforms training,etcc....all passed down from generation to generation.
      I mean,is preserved and rediscovered or is some lost from 5th century?
      Like exact manufacturing of equipment during 5th century can it be done today?

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      @@agenthunk5070 a lot can be done, by studying the archeological remains, but there is no direct "descendance" of military doctrine, uniforms and training. what we know depends on archeological remains and a few literary sources, including some late military manuals
      I know of a single guy who does late 5th-early 6th century Roman, I think he is in Virginia; most of Late Roman reenactment is based in Europe

  • @airshark843
    @airshark843 2 роки тому

    Amazing Presentation!
    Nice Job 👏🏻👏🏻
    I have a question about the langauge spoken, was it Latin or Italian?
    Greetings full of love from "PALÆSTINA PRIMA" 🌹

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  2 роки тому +1

      Hello, thank you for your compliment :)
      The language spoken is Italian, my Latin is not good enough to support this level of complexity in the discourse and the people around me spoke only Italian, I suppose :)

  • @Halfdanr_H
    @Halfdanr_H 2 роки тому +1

    How late was he? Did he miss the whole battle?

  • @khankrum1
    @khankrum1 3 роки тому +3

    No Pasta rationing I see....

  • @josephturner4047
    @josephturner4047 3 роки тому

    Was he confined to barracks for being late?

  • @voyteck7696
    @voyteck7696 3 роки тому +5

    Fat Roman legionares :D

    • @kmaher1424
      @kmaher1424 3 роки тому

      Reenactors in every country!

  • @jeffs6081
    @jeffs6081 Рік тому

    Metatron!

  • @zetoboogaloo8802
    @zetoboogaloo8802 3 роки тому +1

    Ahh so the Roman's liked there bling basically

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, indeed. It was probably a way to carry your money around with you, in an age when banks were not really efficient :) But mostly it was a way to display status through wealth

  • @brickproduction1815
    @brickproduction1815 4 роки тому +2

    Is this what they wore during yhe reign of Romulus Augustulusus

    • @francescorossi524
      @francescorossi524 4 роки тому +3

      It's uncorrect. During all V Century Roman "EXERCITUS" changes "panoplia" and clothes mamy times. For example the helmet and and sword, colours and tactics were really different from the Costantin's time. This soldier-reenactor, Who I salut here, is a soldier about the "principium" of IV Century. Romulus Augustulus saw other kinds of army.

    • @histguy101
      @histguy101 4 роки тому +1

      Romulus Augustus had no army. That's why he was deposed so quickly.

    • @adamfrisk956
      @adamfrisk956 4 роки тому

      @@francescorossi524 Could you elaborate? As I understand, there's little to no difference between 4th and 7th-century Roman troops. It's only after the Thematic system introduction do changes start to creep in, but even then, it's mostly superficial armor and weapon differences.

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +6

      @@adamfrisk956 it's not a radical change, but an expert can tell the differences between early 4th and late 5th century panoplies (from helmet, to tunic, from sword to cingulum to shoes, just to mention a few)

  • @patrickasplund
    @patrickasplund 3 роки тому

    Were the Roman's unaware that Cavalry won't attack in a formation thats formed square?

    • @romatardoimperiale
      @romatardoimperiale 3 роки тому

      Forming a square obliges the unit halt, so provides the enemy with an easy way to stop you

    • @rc59191
      @rc59191 3 роки тому +1

      There's been plenty of cases of cavalry charging a square.

    • @matthiuskoenig3378
      @matthiuskoenig3378 Рік тому +1

      Not just charging them, but breaking them too.

    • @patrickasplund
      @patrickasplund Рік тому +1

      @@romatardoimperiale but without artillery, on a downward slope it would be pointless to attack. Keep ranks 5 deep, cycle every 4 minutes. I know its WAY more action per an hour than the ranks are used too, but it's only while Cavalry is deployed. And if you form it on a slight slope, the enemy shouldn't be able to push you off the high ground with only heavy Cavalry

  • @genekelly8467
    @genekelly8467 5 років тому +1

    Why did they abandone plate-type armor? too expensive?

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  5 років тому +11

      We do not really know, but probably maintenance too complex for its utility, there were types of armour that were better suited for the type of warfare common in Late Antiquity

    • @SilverBlackBird1989
      @SilverBlackBird1989 5 років тому +9

      Economics late Roman Empire was in trouble there was less money so there were fewer legions and more hired Barbarians mercenaries. We al know what that ended up to.

    • @adamfrisk956
      @adamfrisk956 4 роки тому +4

      They did not completely abandon it. Clibanarii and other types of heavy shock cavalry still retained 'manica' plate armour for hands and legs. As for the infantry, my best guess would be the influence of Persia in the 3rd century AD, the abolishment of the legion/auxilia division and the switch to 'fabricae' centralised weapons and armour production, thus leading to more uniformity across the board.

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому

      @@SilverBlackBird1989 actually there were many more military units. The late Roman empire had between 450 and 600 thousand soldiers

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому

      @@adamfrisk956 why would the Roman drop a piece of useful armour because of Persian influence? And why the adoption of the fabricae system should cause the loss of the segmentata, specifically?

  • @DemonGogeta582
    @DemonGogeta582 3 роки тому

    Seniores or iuniores

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      Pardon?

    • @DemonGogeta582
      @DemonGogeta582 3 роки тому +1

      @@furiotogio those equipment. Byzantine have seniores and iuniores troops

    • @DemonGogeta582
      @DemonGogeta582 3 роки тому

      @@furiotogio www.pinterest.ca/amp/pin/523895369151061906/

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      @@DemonGogeta582 yes, but I am not aware in differences of equipment between seniores and iuniores

    • @DemonGogeta582
      @DemonGogeta582 3 роки тому

      @@furiotogio owh okay

  • @revoltanimation8957
    @revoltanimation8957 5 років тому

    Hm

  • @francescofavi3024
    @francescofavi3024 5 років тому

    Non c'è neanche un'armatura...

    • @furiotogio
      @furiotogio  3 роки тому +1

      Non andavano certo in giro con l'armatura ogni momento della loro giornata