Explained! Impedance, Admittance, Reactance, Inductance, Capacitance, Conductance, and Susceptance

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 жов 2024
  • In this video, I'll teach you the difference between the electrical quantities of Impedance (Z), Admittance (Y), Reactance (X), Inductance (L), Capacitance (C), Conductance (G), and Susceptance (B)?
    👉 Visit the full article on Impedance (Z), Admittance (Y), Reactance (X), Inductance (L), Capacitance (C), Conductance (G), and Susceptance (B):
    www.electricalp...
    There are many different types of impedance components and they all rhythm, making it hard to remember which one is which.
    Many even have the same units, which can lead to even further confusion.
    Don’t let the same “-tance” ending fool you.
    If you run into a question on the Electrical PE Exam that asks to solve for one of these components and you aren’t familiar with the exact differences, then you could end up bubbling the wrong answer even if your math and calculations are sound.
    Chances are, you’ve already run into a similar mistake or headache while working sample exam practice problems.
    To make sure this doesn’t happen on the exam day, let’s take a look at all the different components and define them, as well as understand where each comes from.
    (Z) Impedance - A complex number. Opposes the flow of current. Impedance is the sum of resistance and reactance. Z = R+jX [Ω]
    (R) Resistance - opposes the flow of current. Real component of impedance R=Re{Z} [Ω].
    (X) Reactance - Opposes the change of either current or voltage. Imaginary component of Impedance X=Img{Z} [Ω]
    (XL) Inductive Reactance - Reactance that opposes the change of current from an inductance component. XL = 2πfL [Ω]
    (X) Inductance - A reactive impedance component made out of a coil that creates a strong magnetic field created by current flowing through the shape of a coil. [H]
    (XC) Capacitive Reactance - Reactance that opposes the change of voltage from a capacitance component. XC = 1/(2πfC) [Ω]
    (C) Capacitance - A reactive impedance component made out of two conducting plates that never physically touch separated by a dielectric medium that creates a polar build up of charge [F]
    (Y) Admittance - How easily current can flow, or how well current is admitted. A complex number. The inverse of impedance Y = (1/Z) and the sum of conductance and susceptance Y = G+jB [S]
    (G) Conductance - How well a circuit will conduct current. The inverse of resistance and the real component of admittance. G = Re{Y} [S]
    (B) Susceptance - How easily a voltage or current can change in a circuit, or how susceptible a circuit is to the change of voltage or current. The inverse of reactance and the imaginary component of admittance. G = Img{Y} [S]
    Units:
    [Ω] - Ohms
    [H] - Hemrys
    [F] - Farads
    [S] - Siemens or Mhos
    __________________________________
    👉 Visit the full article on Impedance (Z), Admittance (Y), Reactance (X), Inductance (L), Capacitance (C), Conductance (G), and Susceptance (B):
    www.electricalp...
    .
    **** PE EXAM ***
    🔥 SUBSCRIBE for more videos on how to pass the NCEES® Electrical Power PE Exam!
    / @electricalpereview
    .
    🚀 Ready to PASS the NCEES® Electrical Power PE Exam? Sign up for our FREE online study program for the PE Exam:
    courses.electr...
    .
    👀 Electrical Engineering PE Practice Exam and Technical Study Guide by Zach Stone, P.E.:
    amzn.to/2zKz17u
    .
    *** FE EXAM ***
    ⚡ Looking for help with the NCEES® Electrical and Computer FE Exam? Visit our FE Exam UA-cam Channel:
    / @electricalfereview7050
    .
    👇 Ready to pass the NCEES® Electrical and Computer FE Exam? Sign up for our FREE online study program for the FE Exam:
    www.electrical...
    www.electrical...

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @sumemario
    @sumemario 6 років тому +33

    This 12min video helped me know more than my hours of book flipping research. thanks!

  • @whiteowl9343
    @whiteowl9343 Рік тому

    This video is ever-green, helping people even five years after it was made.

  • @kitkat91811
    @kitkat91811 5 років тому +1

    Great video clearing up the different types of "-ance's". This has made me realize how important it is to read the problem carefully and be sure you know what you're being asked to solve.

  • @justinchristian6459
    @justinchristian6459 5 років тому +2

    This is a great video that takes many different electrical terms and makes them simple to understand and the relationship between them. Thanks Electrical PE Review!

  • @rafiperez4546
    @rafiperez4546 6 років тому +1

    This video is great for understanding the different terms and also a reminder to be aware of which units you are working in.

  • @chriskiesler5892
    @chriskiesler5892 5 років тому +1

    Love this video, these terms can get very jumbled in your mind and that leads to misunderstanding. Nice to see them all explained in one concise video!

  • @kaels2012
    @kaels2012 4 роки тому

    This is the first Electrical PE Review video I watched when starting to study for the PE, and I think it's a great little review!

  • @art3m1s9
    @art3m1s9 4 роки тому

    Thanks. Better than an hour long online lecture which i slept all the way .

  • @pmm8272
    @pmm8272 5 років тому +1

    Comparing all of these terms at once really cleared a lot of my confusion up!

  • @JuanpysGoProVideos
    @JuanpysGoProVideos 6 років тому +1

    Great explanation of the "-ance" type electrical components. Still confusing to memorize but it has helped in understanding. thanks Zach

  • @1pspgofan
    @1pspgofan 3 роки тому

    Best explanation ive seen. Im a final year ChemEng student, about to graduate and as a college requirement i have to do circuits and electronics and boy am I like a deer in headlights lmao. 10/10

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  3 роки тому +1

      Glad you found it helpful Hisham! Always enjoy helping other disciplines (non-electrical) of engineers get a better grasp on the material. It doesn't have to be scary or complicated. Good luck with your finals!

  • @jboy6944
    @jboy6944 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for a God-sent video!!!

  • @SF-fb6lv
    @SF-fb6lv Рік тому +1

    That's not a doubleyou, that's an omega..., also siemens is 1/ohms. Siemens is the multiplicative inverse (not just inverse), or reciprocal of ohms.

  • @AJ-et3vf
    @AJ-et3vf 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome video sir! Thank you!

  • @connorfisher1651
    @connorfisher1651 Рік тому +1

    Seems like it would be better to describe inductance and capacitance clearly then build up from there. It's easy for someone like me to get lost in terms without first building an ideological foundation from which to explain the phenomena which we are actually defining. Math is important to describe the dynamic relationships between the magnetic and dielectric fields; how they operate in relation to eachother, and within the confines of the circuit. That being said if we only focus on the equations without clearly explaining the dynamic process that it is actually ocurring then what good does the math do?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  Рік тому

      Hi Connor, thanks for your comment and feedback. This is just intended to be a short explainer video and introduction on the relationships between the different variables for those that are not yet familiar. We do explore the actual theory in much more detail in our online class for the NCEES® Power PE Exam.

  • @alisondecleene6940
    @alisondecleene6940 6 років тому

    So many similar sounding terms that are easy to confuse. Thanks for clearing them up for me.

  • @Lahari12346
    @Lahari12346 7 років тому +1

    it's useful n Tmmrw is my xam... feeling gud to see this Tdy 😊

  • @ahmedsalih5404
    @ahmedsalih5404 4 роки тому

    Super helpful in clarifying these differences.

  • @santoshsapkota4579
    @santoshsapkota4579 7 років тому +1

    simply, clearly ,easily .thanks alot

  • @dhawanbhavya
    @dhawanbhavya 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much sir for your help .
    This video really helped me alot for preparing my online test in this lockdown 🙏

  • @xkcdguy2
    @xkcdguy2 6 років тому +1

    why inductor opposes sudden change in current?
    Ans: When the current flowing through an inductor changes, the time-varying magnetic field induces an electromotive force (e.m.f.) (voltage) in the conductor, described by Faraday's law of induction. According to Lenz's law, the induced voltage has a polarity (direction) which opposes the change in current that created it. As a result, inductors oppose any changes in current through them.

  • @rajkishorelipu
    @rajkishorelipu 2 роки тому

    Seriously, Thanks alot , cleared well this term

  • @matikhan7206
    @matikhan7206 6 років тому +1

    very helpul, sir please make some more videos for ac circuit analysis

  • @feozard7022
    @feozard7022 2 роки тому +1

    I've learned more in twelve minutes than in all my semester, and I'm french

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the comment, I'm glad you found the explanation helpful.

  • @PM-eg7lw
    @PM-eg7lw 3 роки тому

    Thank u thank u thank u pls make more of those 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @7314brperry
    @7314brperry 6 років тому

    This explanation has helped me out a lot!

  • @hssaini31
    @hssaini31 4 роки тому

    Truely informative video

  • @jazier460
    @jazier460 3 роки тому

    Thank you this is very Helpful

  • @henryshamaaon2259
    @henryshamaaon2259 7 років тому +1

    Good refresher for my exam, thanks

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  7 років тому

      Glad you found it helpful, hope you did well on the exam.

  • @md.taohidulalam1774
    @md.taohidulalam1774 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot. God bless you

  • @phanindrak8891
    @phanindrak8891 4 роки тому

    Simple & nice explination sir tnq

  • @edgardito2011
    @edgardito2011 7 років тому +3

    Excellent explication.
    Grate teacher.

  • @PradhyumnGedhar
    @PradhyumnGedhar 4 роки тому +1

    Best I could understand

  • @BrianGriffin14
    @BrianGriffin14 4 роки тому

    Good explanation 👏 👍

  • @IshanKhandelwal
    @IshanKhandelwal 6 років тому +1

    Very Useful video. Thanks..

  • @manilakamboj
    @manilakamboj 4 роки тому

    Great video, glad to check your youtube channel

  • @fpl8648
    @fpl8648 6 років тому +1

    Perfect explanation!!! Thank you!

  • @Simoun2Adol
    @Simoun2Adol 6 років тому +1

    Thank you alot , this is very good review .

  • @pinjinakehkithsinilemetomb5895
    @pinjinakehkithsinilemetomb5895 2 роки тому

    please for more examples and solutions sir

  • @eljefe6852
    @eljefe6852 4 роки тому

    Which is easy to use admittance or impedance? and why?

  • @simon1430
    @simon1430 7 років тому +1

    Hi! Thank you for your help.
    I have a circuit that has impedance and admittance components, if I want to find the total input impedance, should I consider the admittance component by converting it into impedance and add it to the other impedances?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  7 років тому

      Hi Avocadoe, That is correct! Admittance and impedance values are used to describe the same type of element, they just expressed differently as the inverse of the other. If you need to find the total impedance, convert all admittance to impedance first before adding all impedances appropriately depending on if they are in series or parallel.

  • @jynxdmonkey
    @jynxdmonkey 5 років тому

    This is great thanks Zach.

  • @chandrajyothibojjapu9566
    @chandrajyothibojjapu9566 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir

  • @jimmyromanous3674
    @jimmyromanous3674 2 роки тому

    There is simple mathematics that transforms Impedance to Admittance. You have ignored this mathematics all together. But it was a good show 😀

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  2 роки тому

      The relationship between impedance and admittance starts at 8:21. The trig identities to convert between polar and rectangular form are not included in this video but we do have separate videos dedicated to it. This channel focuses on the NCEES Power PE Exam, and since the exam approved calculator can handle these conversions for you we typically omit them for simplicity.

  • @mbenitez6722
    @mbenitez6722 2 роки тому

    Love it! Thank you!

  • @ryanb1874
    @ryanb1874 3 роки тому

    What so impedance is the constant term, R multiplied by the " imaginary term " or is the reactance transient, or is it permanent, well, permanent like a standing wave, which leads to hysterisis loss ect, is that the right way to think about it.? Transient $o every quarter cycle, ?

  • @mohamedfadll4827
    @mohamedfadll4827 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot !

  • @suziyousif
    @suziyousif 3 роки тому

    very helpful! thank you!

  • @SivaSiva-uu5jr
    @SivaSiva-uu5jr 2 роки тому

    Thank you sir

  • @semihsenyuz7436
    @semihsenyuz7436 2 роки тому

    The every word is useful.

  • @nzeakonkeiru6806
    @nzeakonkeiru6806 8 місяців тому

    Thanks bro

  • @KOCHMehulVerma
    @KOCHMehulVerma 3 роки тому

    Gr8 job !!

  • @annuchaudhary164
    @annuchaudhary164 4 роки тому

    thank you

  • @eduardb9604
    @eduardb9604 6 років тому +1

    Hello there. I was trying to find the relationship between these two online, but I found out two completely opposite answers, and I'm wondering which one is the right one.
    Is B = -1/X or is B = 1/X ?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  6 років тому

      Hi Eduard. The polarity of the angle changes when you take the inverse. For a simple experiment try the following on your calculator: 1/(5

  • @delonthompson9631
    @delonthompson9631 7 років тому +1

    I'm still confused a bit. Where did the j go in Xc and XL?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  7 років тому +2

      Don't worry, they didn't go anywhere. Sometimes they are left out when using the value in ohms to describe reactive impedance only, but are always included when using the value in complex math since they are an imaginary component.

  • @amarsiael5951
    @amarsiael5951 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @aaronstark5828
    @aaronstark5828 5 років тому

    very helpful

  • @ГалбаатарЭрдэнэбат

    And can you teach me why always XL is positive XC is negative?

  • @lonelymechanic3688
    @lonelymechanic3688 7 років тому

    thx. great help.

  • @spacedragon4831
    @spacedragon4831 Рік тому

    What happens to susceptance?

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 3 роки тому

    Cool, all the electronics fundamentals with 'ance' in the end.
    Happy Easter!!! Bestfriend Jesus is risen!
    God bless, Revelation 21:4

  • @ultraplastikk
    @ultraplastikk 6 років тому +5

    who else is studying for exams?

  • @dwinovianto1250
    @dwinovianto1250 6 років тому

    how can we get j in Reactance formulas?
    thanks anyway.

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  6 років тому

      Hi Dwi I'm not sure I understand your question. Reactance is just the imaginary component of impedance, so it will either have a positive or negative "j" multiplied by the unit in ohms. For example, a 2 ohm inductor has a reactance of 2 ohms and an impedance of j2 ohms.

    • @dwinovianto1250
      @dwinovianto1250 6 років тому

      ur explanation is what i want.
      so, because reactance cant be measured so it is included in imaginary component.
      is it right?

  • @nowrush
    @nowrush 6 років тому

    Why is the reactance changing signs?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  6 років тому

      The polarity of reactance depends on if it is inductive reactance (-jX) or capacitive reactance (+jX)

  • @ГалбаатарЭрдэнэбат

    Where is the part of acceptance?

    • @roygalaasen
      @roygalaasen 4 роки тому

      It comes right after reluctance.

  • @phamhuutri1996
    @phamhuutri1996 4 роки тому

    can anyone help me answer what is immittance ?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  4 роки тому +1

      Immittance can be used to refer to impedance or admittance: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immittance

  • @somendrakumarjain4144
    @somendrakumarjain4144 7 років тому

    how does [R/(R^2+X^2)] = G ?

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  7 років тому

      Hi Somendra, would you mind telling me the particular type of problem you are attempting to solve? That will help me answer you the best. Thank you!

  • @nowrush
    @nowrush 6 років тому

    What is VARS?!

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  6 років тому

      VARS is the unit of both apparent and complex power and is not a type of impedance. Only impedance terms are covered in this video.

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 років тому

      Acronym for Volt Amp Reactance?

  • @allfive-starproducts
    @allfive-starproducts 3 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @jesseyang3137
    @jesseyang3137 6 років тому +2

    pe god

    • @electricalpereview
      @electricalpereview  6 років тому

      Thanks for compliment Jesse, glad you found the video useful.

  • @johnc4352
    @johnc4352 6 років тому +1

    Just a small critique; just say equal, don't say "equal to", it sounds like you're saying "equal 2". Example, it sounds like you're saying I = 2 V/Z.

  • @wanyinleung912
    @wanyinleung912 5 років тому

    10:14
    ... semens