Hey Jerry, I was already writing some coverage of todays game before you released this (great job btw). This will be in my article tomm: "Radjabov played a double-fianchetto opening as white against Jakovenko, and I was disappointed with the lack of aggression in Jakovenko's response. Radjabov achieved a pressure after a tense middlegame struggle and went on to win thanks to a few nice tactical shots."
Thank you again Jerry for another easy to follow chess commentary. With your help I am able to appreciate every move of chess match I wouldn't otherwise be able to enjoy. 21 minutes well spent :)
Great commentary, I like how you explained so many moves and why some other moves that might have been played would have been bad or just something different.
That was some thorough commentary. Ever think of doing commentary on openings? These thoroughness could be good in explaining things to look for in openings, why the main line was the considered the "main line", etc.
Great job dear Jerry but one advice I made, you ignored it.. I asked you to make the pieces moves more visible and obvious because half of the time and attention we spend in back and forward to see what was the move that was played.. the pieces move in light speed.. You could enlight the piece that is going to move and then catch it and move it slowly to let us see the move.. Anyway thanks again, you are our teacher with your nice and elegant voice..
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight... also back knight to d4 @14. 18 allows white to play knight to d5 leaving black queen stuck f7/ f8
Hey Jerry, I was already writing some coverage of todays game before you released this (great job btw). This will be in my article tomm:
"Radjabov played a double-fianchetto opening as white against Jakovenko, and I was disappointed with the lack of aggression in Jakovenko's response. Radjabov achieved a pressure after a tense middlegame struggle and went on to win thanks to a few nice tactical shots."
Thank you again Jerry for another easy to follow chess commentary. With your help I am able to appreciate every move of chess match I wouldn't otherwise be able to enjoy. 21 minutes well spent :)
Great commentary, I like how you explained so many moves and why some other moves that might have been played would have been bad or just something different.
As always, first rate coverage. Your explainations are crystal clear. Thanks for all your excellent videos, they are really appreciated.
Amazing analysis Jerry, thanks so much for the video. Two in one day - how lucky are we!!!!
wonderful video. Great commentary on controlling squares.
Thanks!
That was some thorough commentary. Ever think of doing commentary on openings? These thoroughness could be good in explaining things to look for in openings, why the main line was the considered the "main line", etc.
great commentary and games, love your channel!
Great job dear Jerry but one advice I made, you ignored it.. I asked you to make the pieces moves more visible and obvious because half of the time and attention we spend in back and forward to see what was the move that was played.. the pieces move in light speed.. You could enlight the piece that is going to move and then catch it and move it slowly to let us see the move.. Anyway thanks again, you are our teacher with your nice and elegant voice..
thank u JERRY FOR RADJABOV GAME COMENTARY
Wow, so many Jerry videos lately... I don't know what to say I'm so happy!
@xdragon2k Thank you. :)
Bravo, Teimour. All we azerbaijanians are proud of you.
really
nice
analysis
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight... also back knight to d4 @14. 18 allows white to play knight to d5 leaving black queen stuck f7/ f8
Thanks for the video. Well done
@PeterPunkBoy After Qf7 it's a similar scenario...knight...queen still hit.
At 20:17, what was the point of trading rooks like that? Couldnt white have simply attacked the rook watching over the promotion pawn?
Very enlightening description
Keep up the good work Jerry
nice analysis
16:48 the other reason not to play pawn takes pawn is bishop takes knight and queen forks the king and rook
@skydragon207 The queen doesn't take, it's the rook that takes the bishop and he's left with a massive light square weakness around his king! :)
Instead of Rd7 would Rc7 work?
9:15 you said Bh3, maybe Jakovenko was worried about the c3 knight going to d2 then f2 to trap the black bishop.
that was an excellent game
As always I got something out of it. Thanks
Thank you!!!!
@yomammaspoodle Thanks.
@nicocola1 What was the joke?
in 8:00
y not just e6 to block the night?
Future ori Unser:
Because than Ne4 and than N to d6 or f6 are very strong (what ever will be possible)
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight...
@ChessNetwork just Rxd5 :)
@lastwarrior2004 d1-f2*
Freaking awesome!
9:40 : 20. ... Bh3 would run into 21. Nd1 threatening winning that bishop. 21. ... Ne6 22. Nf2 Ng5 23 f4. Or 21. ... f4 22. g4 h5 23. Nf2. Or 21. ... g5 22. Nf2 g4 23. Nxh3 gh ruining Black's king position
@l3loodHunter lol you are right but then it will be check mate for black..
Interesting till the end '-'
Ok teimour radjabov
GG
first!
I would not of allowed the pass pawn from black but that's why I suck at chess :) very clear presentation ,thank you .