Discrepo de las formas modernas de realizar kata-guruma, amén de muchas de las nuevas reglas de arbitraje, que desde mi punto de vista están limitando muchísimo la práctica del judo. Una cosa es evolucionar y otra es no saber hacia donde. Amén de esto tengo que felicitar a Emil por la forma "sencilla" de sus explicaciones técnicas, marcas los tiempos y los pasos , no como otros que se tiran media hora parar explicar un o-goshi. Sienpre comparto tus vídeos con mis compañeros, . Felicitaciones por tan buen trabajo Emil.
IMO the main issue with this technique (which is obviously not kata guruma but that's not the point) is that it's often considered worthy of score even when there is a clear pause during its execution. I've seen this done several times in two times where in the first part tori is just pulled to the ground to the front, then there's a pause and in the second half tori just rolls on the ground. In those times, a score was given. With some sane rules this should never be considered score but "hikkomi waza" or a pull to the ground with the purpose to continue in ne waza.
There is no way this technique (horrible, even) can be called kata-guruma. This technique primarily uses the principle of sutemi-waza, as the tori throws his body so that he can apply the technique. And since he wraps himself around the uke, the only thing left to do is choose a variation of uchi-makikomi.
Discrepo de las formas modernas de realizar kata-guruma, amén de muchas de las nuevas reglas de arbitraje, que desde mi punto de vista están limitando muchísimo la práctica del judo. Una cosa es evolucionar y otra es no saber hacia donde. Amén de esto tengo que felicitar a Emil por la forma "sencilla" de sus explicaciones técnicas, marcas los tiempos y los pasos , no como otros que se tiran media hora parar explicar un o-goshi. Sienpre comparto tus vídeos con mis compañeros, . Felicitaciones por tan buen trabajo Emil.
Muchas gracias Vicente 🙏🏻 Saludos
IMO the main issue with this technique (which is obviously not kata guruma but that's not the point) is that it's often considered worthy of score even when there is a clear pause during its execution. I've seen this done several times in two times where in the first part tori is just pulled to the ground to the front, then there's a pause and in the second half tori just rolls on the ground. In those times, a score was given. With some sane rules this should never be considered score but "hikkomi waza" or a pull to the ground with the purpose to continue in ne waza.
Agreed
There is no way this technique (horrible, even) can be called kata-guruma. This technique primarily uses the principle of sutemi-waza, as the tori throws his body so that he can apply the technique.
And since he wraps himself around the uke, the only thing left to do is choose a variation of uchi-makikomi.
Very ugly version of Kata Guruma. The hybrid Yoko Otoshi version at least looks way more aesthetic.