50:45 सम्राट अशोक ब्राह्मण नहीं थे, इसलिए ब्राह्मणी को अशोक में सुंदरता नज़र नहीं आई। मगर शारीरिक रूप से आठ जगहों से टेढे़मेडे अष्टावक्र 'ब्राह्मण' थे; वो सभी ब्राह्मणों को रूप-लावण्य से कामदेव से भी सुंदर नज़र आते हैं। जिनमें टेढ़ापन की बजाय ब्राह्मणत्व का ब्रह्मज्ञान नजर आता है।
जैसे ही रोमिला थापर का नाम लिया मैने सुनना छोड़ दिया। जिसे फारसी नही संस्कृत नही आती। वह इतिहासकार है मध्य काल की। धन्य है आपका ज्ञान। जो इतिहासकार है उनका क्या इतिहास है बहुत महत्वपूर्ण होता है।
@41:00 is fun to watch counter question by Saurabh according to her and her Guru Romila thapar, she is saying only those account will be taken in which destruction has taken place so Hindus were worshipping manath as Shiva and what about our account of Jyoterling will not be taken into consideration. So where is jyoterling name Somnath is??
@@mb-hb1fr pahli baat Hindu koi dharm nhi hai 🤣 Aap current affair ki class Kiya Karo aapko pata chal jayega Nalanda University ki khudai kare to pata nhi kitne Buddha melege
The most judicious historian Dr.ms sharma having sufficient Knowledge of Persian,English, Hindi language expressed relevant Indian history. I salute young historian. From r r chishti Advocate.
yah farji Ruchika Sharma bhi Jhooth bol rahi hai aur tum Khud bhi Jahan khodo vahan Budh Nahin Nikalti Hai yah jhuthi bakwas hai puratatvik proof prachur Matra Mein Bharat mein hai Sab padh lo sab hindu dharm Se Hi nikala hai Prachin❤farji itihaaskar Ko to Mein Khud proof ke sath bakaiti band kar sakta hu Bade channel per Jise Koi Aata Jata Nahin Aise farji Logon Ko Bitha Lete HainHam mante Hain Ki Ruchika Sharma ka gyan madhyakaalin ka hairecent history ka gyan Nahin Hai To usmein kudna Nahin
Whenever she becomes nervous she start playing with her hair. 43:29 .When Saurabh asked "गजनी ख़ुद क्या लिखता है?" and then she get nervous and start playing with her hair.
At 42:39 Saurabh asked her question about which source is authentic and she was visibly stumped and struggled, though she got back to her foot quickly but the damage is done. Also she not expecting Saurabh to cross question
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
26:17 to 26:43 madam Mohamad Tuglak ki tareef karte nahi thkti aur mahan batarhi hai logo ko kahrhi hiki log kisi ko bhi vilan bana detehai 32:35 to 33:30 ke beech ye madam Darashikho ko alcoholic bekar batati hai aur Aurangzeb mahan aur aacha batane ki kosis karti dikh rhi hai , Is vido me ye madam mugal sultano ko mahan aur aacha batane ke chakr me is had tak chli gai ki kah diya ki mugal time me sati pratha ke instances bhut kam ho gaye the kyno ki mugal badsah is jaghanya apradh ko kma kiya jasake. Isse aur age badhkar Madane to mugal badsao ki tareef me ye tak kah diya ki badsah bhart ki janta ke Religion par anch nahi anedena chate the(jis tuglak aur aurang jeb ne bhart ke religion aur mandiro ko toda tabah kiya logo ko talvar ke dam par convert karne par majboor kiya vo bhart ke logo ke religion par anch tak nahi ane dena chate the). Inki mansikta isse hi samajh ajati hai ? MAdam pure video me kuch references dene ke nam par sirf kuch nam leti dikhti hi par correct reference nahi deti. isme ye kisi travler, kisi fari mugal ya muslim ka nam leti hai ya kisi book ya writer ke nam lete diki par khana par likhahai aisa correct refrance nahi deti dikhi sayd ye janti haiki koi bhi itna time lekar nhi baitha ki jakr un sab refrances ko dhundne jayega ? ua-cam.com/video/_jie_DRgWX8/v-deo.html, aur jada jankari ke liye inke diye refrances ko dhyan se dkehe bhut khuc miljayga, inke twwitter account me inke followers aur ye kinko follow karte hi to sayd agenda samajh sakte hi sayd?
Romila Thaapar was recently talking about Yuthisthir in Ashoka time, which was hilarious. 😂😂So definitely her work should be thoroughly checked just as she suggested academically, but the problem is whenever someone tries to do that, their whole professional attacks collectively on befalf of her. 😅😅
@@ankitjain3760 but here I am, talking about two time periods. I am not here asking her to have proof about whether Mahabharat or Budhha really existed or not ?😂😂 You are not getting my point here. Moreover, she is not an expert for Indus Valley history. She hasn't included any archeological proofs for her books of history with respect to the medieval period. I have read her books. Moreover, this lady in the video is so deceptive and cunning. I just asked her about Nalanda University timeline of destruction because it's actually officially available on the Bihar ASI website that it was destroyed by Bakhityar Khilji. When I sent that ASI official link to this moron student of Romila Thaapar, She blocked me.
शिवपुराण में द्वादश ज्योतिर्लिंग है 14 नहीँ श्लोक प्रारम्भ ही सुनें सौराष्ट्र च सोमनाथे श्री शैले मल्लिकार्जुनम उज्जैनम महाकल् म ओमकार ममलेश्वरम परालयम च वैधनात्म डाकिनयं भीमाशंकरम अंतिम यह है हिमालय तू केदारम घ्रसनेस्वर शिवालय 12 ज्योतिर्लिंग सभी प्राचीन शास्त्रों में
Somnath “Somesvara” temple is located in Prabhas Patan on coastline of Saurashtra. In Vana Parva of Mahabharat there is a mention of a pilgrim site (Tirtha) in Prabhasa Pattana. In Shiv Purana the 1st Jyotirlinga is mentioned as Prabhasa Pattana. But Ruchika wants to refer only Farsi sources and Romila Thapars research thesis.
ISS GADHI LADY NE TOHH... CHANDRASHEKHAR🌙BHAGWAAN BHAIRAVV KO SOM🌙NATH SE "LADY SU- MANAAT" ... ..BANA DIYA AORR UPARR SE YEHH BHI KEHH RAHI HAI KI ISSSEYY BADI GADHEE LADY ROMILLA THAAPAR👎 NE "BAHUT ACHHI KITAAB LIKHE HAI" sacch mein gadheeyon ke sirr parr seenghh nahin hote 😡🌛
@@PHYSMATH29 achcha to Tibet mein mili kalp vigrah murti ke saath jo tamr Patra Mila Jo ki sanskrit mein likha hua tha voh 32000 varsh Purana keise saabit hua. Ye investigation CIA-america ne ki hei meine nahi dekhlo.
As she is trying keep positive image of Ghajini that he was destroying SOMNATH temple bcz he took it as su-manath. I am very sure she must have some positive arguement for Bhaktiyar khilji about destroying Nalanda University.
first of all tell me who was Khalji and Ghajni from where did they came and where did they belong from? You are a big naive gobarbhakt to put both together. Going by your logic, Arabic world should bomb mongolia because Genghis laid their city into rubles.
@@chesstimenytime6994 let's assume what if Ghanjini didn't take it as su-manath then would he have destroyed Somnath? What do you think? Answer it with logic
@@kallolpoetryAnd I am not putting khilji and Ghazni together, I am putting theirs logic behind massacre and loot together and the logic was Islam. Tumhare Abbajaan ke pitaji bhi kabhi gobarbhakt hua krte the lekin afsos ab tum sab katwe ho gye ho.
आपका timestamp सही नहीं है शायद 58:30 है शायद लेकिन वो जीभ फिसलना माना जा सकता है। वैसे भी वो इतिहासकार (Historian) हैं धर्म विशेषज्ञ (Theologist) नहीं।
यहां सुनकर देखकर एक राय तो पक्का बन रही, कि सुनाने वाला या लिखने वाला खुद भृमित हो तो सामने वाले को अपने पर विश्वास ना करने की वजह दे बैठता है। और कुछ इतिहासकार या कोई भी लेखक अपनी बात को स्पष्टता, प्रमाणिक और वजनदार तरीके से रखे तो असत्य इतिहास भी विश्वसनीय लगने लगता है।
if prophet born in india then - “The Prophet [ﷺ] married Aisha when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.” - The revered Sahih al-Bukhari, 5134; Book 67, Hadith 70. Section 375(6): Rape (under eighteen years of age) Different punishments have been decided foe rape of women in different ages. Rape of women under 16 years of age: Rigorous imprisonment of not less than 20 years/ life and fine. he is not suitable for modern world even today muslim is good then prophet Why i right Indian law beacause muslim belive he is ideal man for all time and follow him and his did is sunna part of Islam , what prophet did is halal for every muslim . So if Sharia law implement then merrige 6 year child is valid that country if they follow real Sharia.
आज तक चैनल को वैसे भी कहते हैं अमेरिकी जासूसी संस्था सीआईए का चैनल है इसका काम केवल हिंदुओं को गुलाम बनाए रखना है किस तरह से मांडू का ही हुआ एक नई नवली पीएचडी स्कॉलर को बुला लिया गया जिसके अभी सिर्फ सबमिट हुई है एक्सेप्ट नहीं हुई है आखिर उसमें क्या इतनी खास बात देखी जा रही है जी हां औरंगजेब का महिमा मंडल करना था हिंदुओं सावधान आज तक से
It is ridiculous. Was there any goddess named Manat in the ancient or medieval India? But Siva was there all the time. To say that Somnath was Su Manat is like saying there is possibility of finding a temple of David in ancient India. Salute such historical scholarship!
I will just clarify. The goddess is talking about is one that belongs to pre Islam era. She was one of the three chieftains of Mecca City along with her two sisters. Alat and Aluzza. She is very sacred to Persians historically. I guess that is what she is referring to
Lallan top is in love Muslims and Rahul Gandhi .... makes sense their hosts have similar views ... Ruchika must have muslin boy friend ... that is my guess ..LOL
आज तक चैनल को वैसे भी कहते हैं अमेरिकी जासूसी संस्था सीआईए का चैनल है इसका काम केवल हिंदुओं को गुलाम बनाए रखना है किस तरह से मांडू का ही हुआ एक नई नवली पीएचडी स्कॉलर को बुला लिया गया जिसके अभी सिर्फ सबमिट हुई है एक्सेप्ट नहीं हुई है आखिर उसमें क्या इतनी खास बात देखी जा रही है जी हां औरंगजेब का महिमा मंडल करना था हिंदुओं सावधान आज तक से
बहुत ही बेहतरीन चर्चा रहीं, शायद सौरभ जी की आज तक की मेरी देखी हुई सभी चर्चाओं में सब से बेहतर होगी, इतिहास कभी जीवित नहीं होता, और कभी मरता भी नहीं। मलाल बस इस बात का हैँ की ये चर्चा तक पहुंचने में मुझे साल भर का समय लगा।
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
भाई चेहरा खूबसूरत होने जाने से व्यक्ति ज्ञानी नहीं बन जाता है.. रिसर्चर नहीं बन जाता है , यही बात यूपीएससी में है सुंदर-सुंदर लड़कियों को इंटरव्यू लेने वाले अच्छा नंबर दे देते हैं. मैं यह पहली बार सुन रहा हूं कि मंदिरों में कारखाने होते थे!!!! यह इतिहास की प्रोफेसर नहीं कहानी की प्रोफेसर है। और लल्लनटॉप वाले तो एक नंबर के ठरकी हैं. यह करते ही ऐसा काम है जिसका चेहरा खूबसूरत हो उसको बुलाकर इंटरव्यू लेते रहते हैं।
Don't tell spicy stories please deliver History as it is mam. And also don't tell people like... "that would have been happened" Rather quote actual facts so that people will know it clearly. And I would suggest that bring experts who have properly read and decoded these inscriptions and archaeologists and not Historians. And finally GET WELL SOON LALLANTOP.
Body language is understandable about agenda. This is what jnu agenda. Recently started watching lallantop . It is very interesting to see this lady have great respect for Moghals and her mental position for Great Ashok, etc.
Bade geyaani hai aap ko bhut geyaan hai history main jo hua wo sab aap ko malum hai Sab ka knowledge leya karo jo admi apne knowledge ko final shamjhta hai wo kya houta hai boulna zarure nahi hai
@@hotelsilverpalace3878 bhaiya inko mat samjhao, unke paas Roz history wale msg aate hai WhatsApp par, bahot Gyan milta h waha i.e. 80 kilo ka bhala etc..😂
@@hotelsilverpalace3878 buddhi k balm....Hai uske paas knowledge.....sala usko debate k liye challenge karta hai to chup jati hai....aur source Dene bolo ki khud k likhe hue yaa uske connections Wale ne like hue chuje ka article deti hai chaman
@@madan123xyz भाई आपसे पूर्णतः सहमत हूँ। मानवता श्रेष्ठ है लेकिन किसी के पूर्वजों को दूसरे के बताने से वैमन्सयता का भाव जाग्रत होता है।गुर्जर, जाट,राजपूत व अहीर सभी क्षत्रिय वर्ण की मराठा और ठाकुर etc. महान उपाधियों से सुशोभित जातियां रहीं हैं और भाई इतिहास में जो जिस वंश का है वो सब लिख कर गए हैं तत्कालीन स्त्रोत भी हैं, अब आधुनिक जगत भी है और वैसे जातिवाद सबसे बड़ा ज़हर है इसे खत्म होना चाहिए और तत्कालीन समय में जो जिस वंश का था उसे उसी प्रकार सम्मान देना जरूरी है,सत्य रुपी शब्दों और सम्मान से सही इतिहास लिखकर असत्य को बदलना चाहिए। जो कर्नल टॉड ने जातिवादी मानसिकता में 900 वर्षों के महान गुर्जर कुषाण, गुर्जर हूण व गुर्जर प्रतिहार और उनके गुर्जर सामंतों को राजपूत बताकर विशालकाय गुर्जर इतिहास में भ्रम पैदा करने का काम किया वो गलत है
@@968avtar सब विदेशी हो हूण कुषाण गुर्जर…घुसपैठिए रबात इंस्क्रिप्शन पढ़ो कनिष्क के समरकंद के भगोड़े 😂😂 रबात इंस्क्रिप्शन पोल खुल रही है तुम्हारे पूर्वजों की ua-cam.com/video/7H7NR_rMeis/v-deo.html
@@nsentertainment8976 बिल्कुल भाई,गुर्जर जाति से गुर्जर राष्ट्र / गुजरात (आधुनिक गुजरात,मध्य प्रदेश, महाराष्ट्र राजस्थान etc.),राजपूत से राजपुताना etc.
भाई साहब!आप क्या दिखाना चाहते हैं? अब हमें रोमिला थापर के इतिहास से परहेज करना चाहिए। रुचिका ने बड़े सफाई के साथ अंग्रेज़ इतिहासकारों को विलेन और रोमिला थापर का महिमामंडन कर दिया। यही तो जेएनयू है।
इनको इतिहास में फिर से स्नातक करनी चाहिए, स्नातक स्तर का लेवल भी इनके पास नहीं है। चंद अरबी फारसी शब्द को जान लेने से कोई इतिहासकार नहीं हो सकता। हास्यास्पद ज्ञान। इस मंच पर पहली बार इतना कम स्तर का इतिहास पर बातचीत सुनना पड़ा
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
Ha ye kuchh ni janti comment krne wale sab bade se bade itihaskar h😅😅 chahe 1 kitaab bhi na padhi ho... Isliye hum sab comment mein bhonk rhe h aur wo waha bethi h
मैडम इतनी अच्छी तरह से बता रही हैं मानो कुतुबुद्दीन तैमूर खिलजी सभी ने आक्रमण और मार काट कर के इस देश पर बहुत बड़ा अहसान किया है। जे एन यू की शिक्षा को सलाम।
26:17 to 26:43 madam Mohamad Tuglak ki tareef karte nahi thkti aur mahan batarhi hai logo ko kahrhi hiki log kisi ko bhi vilan bana detehai 32:35 to 33:30 ke beech ye madam Darashikho ko alcoholic bekar batati hai aur Aurangzeb mahan aur aacha batane ki kosis karti dikh rhi hai , Is vido me ye madam mugal sultano ko mahan aur aacha batane ke chakr me is had tak chli gai ki kah diya ki mugal time me sati pratha ke instances bhut kam ho gaye the kyno ki mugal badsah is jaghanya apradh ko kma kiya jasake. Isse aur age badhkar Madane to mugal badsao ki tareef me ye tak kah diya ki badsah bhart ki janta ke Religion par anch nahi anedena chate the(jis tuglak aur aurang jeb ne bhart ke religion aur mandiro ko toda tabah kiya logo ko talvar ke dam par convert karne par majboor kiya vo bhart ke logo ke religion par anch tak nahi ane dena chate the). Inki mansikta isse hi samajh ajati hai ? MAdam pure video me kuch references dene ke nam par sirf kuch nam leti dikhti hi par correct reference nahi deti. isme ye kisi travler, kisi fari mugal ya muslim ka nam leti hai ya kisi book ya writer ke nam lete diki par khana par likhahai aisa correct refrance nahi deti dikhi sayd ye janti haiki koi bhi itna time lekar nhi baitha ki jakr un sab refrances ko dhundne jayega ? ua-cam.com/video/_jie_DRgWX8/v-deo.html, aur jada jankari ke liye inke diye refrances ko dhyan se dkehe bhut khuc miljayga, inke twwitter account me inke followers aur ye kinko follow karte hi to sayd agenda samajh sakte hi sayd?
Baithki ka ye episode with historian Ruchika Sharma, kaafi achcha laga. Kaafi saare misconception clear huye. Apne desh history k baare kaafi sara jaane ko mila. Hoping ki aise aur jyada episodes hone chahiye.
Timur is a national hero in Uzbekistan. Samarkand is in Uzbekistan, not in Iran, though the region is a part of erstwhile Persia. Timurs most famous monuments are probably in present day Uzbekistan. Crusaders came from all over Europe. Not just Spain and Italy. They came from eastern Europe, Germany, france and from the British isles. The knights came in huge numbers. And Richard the lion heart, who fought the third crusade was the king of England.
सोमनाथ मंदिर के नीचे तो कुछ और ही है जो दबाया गया है इतिहास तो असली अभी तक बाहर आने ही नहीं दिया गया!! भारत के लोग हिंदू बने घूम रहे हैं, उनको पता ही नहीं है। उनका धर्म कौन सा है? #Rational_World #Science_Journey Sunday Tuesday Thursday Time 07:00pm
सोमनाथ मंदिर नहीं बल्कि एक बुद्धिष्ट मठ है । नीचे के तीन तल बुद्धिस्ट आर्किटेक्चर एवं बुद्धिस्ट मूर्तियाँ है । यही हाल भारत के सभी प्राचीन मंदिरों का है । बुद्धिस्ट मथो पर क़ब्ज़ा कर के मंदिर बता दिया गया है ।
Bhrman gapod isko askoa pata nahi tha chala gapodne engraz train dake gaye iski aukd nahi chala ghyan batne Tum logo ki aukad pata chalalge ashoka kay barame bolte ho science journey UA-cam channel ref Sjl245 time 2.52 .0
ये देखो जिस असोक का 1915 से पहले भारत के लोग नाम तक नहीं जानते थे उसके नाम पर तरह तरह की कहानियां बना दी गई... असोक को अशोक लिखने लगे इतिहासकार. ..और जिस असोक के 40 के करीब अभिलेखों और स्तंभों की भाषा पाली को अंग्रेजों ने रिसर्च के बाद पढ़ना संभव किया उस असोक पर तरह तरह की कहानियां आज ब्राह्मण इतिहासकार गढ़ कर भ्रम फैला रहे हैं! असोक से इतना डर? क्यों? असल मे जिनके अपने इतिहास का अता पता नहीं हो वो ही दूसरों के इतिहास को बिगाड़कर अपनी कुंठा निकालते हैं! हिंदू धर्म, वैदिक काल , ब्राह्मण ...इन सबका इतिहास ढूंढ कर दिखाओ तुममे दम हो तो....चाहो भी तो नहीं दिखा सकते दुनिया को. . जब है ही नहीं कुछ 10 वीं सदी के पहले का तुम्हारा तो दिखाओगे क्या!
Can see that she has studied at JNU. Ignore twelve jyotirling. Go by Romila Thapar who says Somnath was not a Shiva temple. Ignore inconvenient issues from Goan king’s description from his Somnath visit. On Mandu, quickly dismiss contribution of Parmars and straight go to the Muslim rulers. Ignore breaking of temples and create confusion about temples being palace.
Exactly. Can't even speak "parmar" word properly. And then blaming Britishers for declaring Mughals "barbarian". Where she'll direct our future generation. I pity on her
मैडम कपूडगाथा मत सुनाइए. पीएचडी कर रहे हो या स्पाइडर मेन, बैटमैन की कहानियाँ बना रही हो. हिस्ट्री को सही से पढ़िए. रुट लेवल तक जाइए. बकवास स्टोरी कोई सुनेगा नहीं.अगर डिबेट करनी है ओपन प्लेटफार्म पर कीजिये. पता चल जायेगा कितनी हिस्ट्री आती है.
अगर आपने कोई गलतियां बताई होती तो शायद एक चर्चा शुरू हो सकती थी। पर जिस जाहिलाना अंदाज में आपने अपनी नापसंदगी दिखाई है उसको नज़रंदाज़ करने के अलावा और कुछ नहीं किया जा सकता है।
Bakwas toh tumne usse zada kar di. Instead of countering her logically, you started gibberish, so what's the point? You could expose her lies right away but you don't have the guts to do it, do you?
@@WalletmoneyOnline You aren't the sharpest tool in the box, are you mate? I used his "words" - bakwas to expose his "hypocrisy" doesn't mean I said wo bakwas kar ri h. I liked how you cherry picked the sentence to answer, that speaks volume.
Smartest people are never afraid to look stupid. Saurabh knows this. He mixes his curiosity with stupid innocence making the guest feel more like a teacher. I refuse to believe that anything she told Saurabh didn't know beforehand because he reads too much. Other thing, really amazing to see a young woman historian. Being a history scholar myself, I really 'liked' her.
Saurabh is so learned, that he deliberately interrupts the lady when she talks about Allauddin Khilji coming from Afghanistan saying the film showed Jamaluddin coming thus correcting her and then she eventually told the sequence….
इतिहासकार जो अलग अलग राजसत्ता के समकालीन थे, उन्होंने कहीं न कहीं अपनी राजसत्ताओं की चाटुकारिता जरूर की होगी, मोंन्युमोंट भी कहीं न कहीं राजसत्ताओं की अतिरेक प्रशस्ति का ही प्रतीक है. विज्ञान और तकनीक, कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता से उमींद है सही इतिहास जानने को मिल पायेगा. रुचिका जी, सौरभ जी को इस मंथनीय संवाद हेतु धन्यवाद।
Historians usually are divided in to 3:- 1) Ancient 2) Medieval 3) Modern And Ms. Ruchika is a Medieval historian with some knowledge or info overlapping at both ends (start of medieval period & end of medieval period).
😅 ----ea professor leftists Hai aur es SE AAP agar sunte ho ke shreemad Muhammad ghori tab bhi ascharjya mat hona........................= So, ea Lipapoti PE expert Hai lallan top Aur professors ki Lipapoti Kya BAAT Hai..........._ So, avir ne slmnath ko luta par shreemad Muhammad ghori ne behi Wah re divedi aur WA re lady professor 😊 Increcpttion aur Lipapoti 😊😅😅😅
आखिर कह दिया ना आजके सब हिन्दू देव-देवी महायान बुद्धिस्म से ही आया है! रान्डेल कोलिन्स कहते हैं कि " भारतीय समाज के लिए बुनियादी सांस्कृतिक ढांचा बौद्ध धर्म द्वारा निर्धारित किया गया था जो हिंदू धर्म में बदल गया है" ।
Have you ever thought if , Buddhism neither believe in God nor in soul, than why they started making Buddha idols and started worshipping as God in Mahayana budhism ?
@@Razor_n_scalpel Many thanks. It is her understanding, how could it will affect me ? My belief is is not so fragile to be disturbed by others,my DP has also taught me to accept everything, because he is Jagannatha ,not Nath of any religion or region.
So according to her the Farsi writings about temple destruction is wrong but a random scripture about abhirs looting the temple is correct . When Britishers talk about Islamic invasions then it is wrong but when they talk about Aryan invasion then it is right . She also tried to support Romila Thapar and ironically most of her references for ancient India are British and German Indologists. So British references are correct when it comes to ancient history but not when it comes to medieval times . Saurabh’s counter question about Somnath and reference of jyotirling was spot on and she became uncomfortable and rejected that also. So basically she’s a monkey historian who tries to monkey balance the history unnecessarily. There is a term used by many Muslim kings as “BUTSHIKAN” which means destroyer of the idols . Islamic invaders used to put head of cows on idols and slaughter cows in temples to humiliate Hindus specially in north India that’s why cow slaughter is a sensitive issue in north. If they just wanted to loot the temples then why to break the idols ? They could have just left with the gold . Many historians also say that not much of the conversion happened in India but forgetting about total Muslims in Indian subcontinent and Hindus are 110 crores and Muslims are 60 crores so from where these 60 crores Muslims arrived? Even Sambhaji was tortured and killed because he rejected to covert to Islam. These white washing historians and liberals who try to put the dust under the carpet are one of the reasons of upsurging of the right wing in india . Saurabh ji i believe you are a neutral and unbiased but in future if you want to give space to these kinds of historians then also bring historians like Minakshi Jain , Sampat , S saideepak , professor Ranganathan etc to counter them other wise it’s a certain narrative being forwarded by them and to counter them more and more people will make movies like kashmir files and it will only harm the left wing and Muslims of India .
Absolutely right. She is very much biased. It’s in fashion to create podcast with half or no knowledge because the masses are yet to discover the truth. Whole comment section is a PR. Lallantop is a left channel….They started as neutral but not anymore. Just check there report on Atik Ahmad.
Waiting for guests like J Sai Deepak, Vikram Sampath, Dr. Meenakshi Jain and Dr. Anand Ranganathan. Hope Lallantop invites them and we get to hear their side of the story. Copyin Harekrishna ji
मुल्तान से पश्चिम बंगाल तक और कश्मीर से कर्नाटक तक 🙏🚩 जिस की तूती बोलती थी हां गुर्जर प्रतिहार #मिहिरभोज ही वह नाम था 💪💪 जिसको सुन उस वक्त शत्रुओं की गद्दी डोलती थी🚩⛳🇮🇳
Number of Ashokan inscriptions are 33 not seventy - eighty, out of 33 14 are rock edicts ( shilalekh) and 7 are pillar edicts...gazab ka itihas me anusandhan karya kiya hai ma'am aapne 🎉
When Ashok writing his "lipi" as dhamm, why u calling it Brahmi ?? Ashok and samundgupt both used dhamm lipi it means both were Buddhist ! If gupt were brahmin, why they would tolerate praise of buddhist king written above.
@@udayraj6976 if the sources support it then definitely.. but if it is all tell tales then I will not accept the left or the right... like how the inscriptions of quwwatul islam mosque near qutub minar states that it was built by the destruction of 27 temples.. we will definitely accept that but if you say babri masjid was built by the destruction of a ram temple than you will have to provide sources of first that it existed, then it's destruction and then the construction... and as the judgement clearly states we don't know the answer to them.. and the evidence is all superimposed and not studied properly..
@@udayraj6976why should we overlap and why the overlap needs to be accepted? Jiska proof nahin hai usko kyun accept karein? Khayali pulav pakane ke liye ya false pride generate karne ke liye?
@@garimakilledar5810 again the same thing, if u really are truthmonger then you should not listen to anybody apart from archaeologists. historians will have a bias. problem is the ones you like are the true historians and the ones you dont are just spreading hate and its just propaganda. i have seen people who dont even believe the archaeologists, just because it doesnt fit in their pov. dont just go for one historian.
@@shafiulhaidary4567 bekar ek pada likha smjhdar hota to isne jo jo kuch interview me kha ek ek baat samjh jata ki iske pas koi refrence nhi hai shafiul tere baski nahi rende mat bol yar in sabme mat pad bhai madarsa jaao aapko waha sab bulare hai bhai........
There are so many instances of contradiction in her testimony. Why would she visit Iran to find out about Timur, which suffered a similar fate as India in the past with his attacks. Timur’s major monuments are in Uzbekistan and not in Iran. She conveniently refuses to address the description of Somnath temple in Sanskrit sources where it appears with a different name “Prabhasa Patan”. She assumes that Akbar didn’t know what was inscribed on the pillar because it was some British guy who later deciphered it. How can she jump to this conclusion? As the sources are silent, there is also a possibility that someone during Akbar’s reign translated Brahmi for him to understand the inscriptions on the pillar. These and many other instances clearly show that enthusiasm to discover something in new generation scholars of History doesn’t translate into experience which actually generates expertise to understand history through various lenses. As a matter of fact most of the modern Indian historians specially from the JNU Gharana, consistently and conveniently are reluctant to dig deeper into folklore traditions which have remained a key for transfer of knowledge in successive generations. Such reluctance in a country which is known for its oral tradition of preservation of history, is deeply concerning.
She knows a lot but her knowledge is limited to around Mandu. For everything else she depends on Romila Thapar's reference. This is the exact problem, we have with our historians. She doesn't want to believe what Ghajni wrote on Somnath but believes on Romila Thapar. She is not able to answer most of the questions on reference and says there is no answer to all questions. Excellent discussion to expose how history should not be believed as it is and need to hear all views.
बहुत ही दुःख के साथ कहना पड रहा हैं कि महिला जो ज्ञान दे रही है उसमे तथ्यों को बहुत ही ज्यादा छिपाया गया हैं वह सिर्फ उतनी ही बात बता रहीं है जो विमर्श ये स्थापित करना चाहती हैं. . सौरभ जी ने इन्हे क्यों बुलाया में ये नहीं समझ पा रहा.. आदरणीया को अपनी जानकारी बढ़ानी हो तो मेरे पास तथ्य है... सम्पर्क कर प्राप्त कर सकती हैं।
हा क्योंकि ये तो बोल रही है की सुमुनाथ की मूर्ति को तोड़ने गजनवी आया था 😂 इसको ये नही पता कि जब वो वापस जा रहा था तो उससे लड़ते लड़ते कितने राजपुत राजा शहिद हो गए सोमनाथ बचाने को
Dr.ruchica ji salamat rahen aameen khuda umr daraz kare, aapne bahut qimti baten bataien hain, pehli bar aapko suna,s.a.ali Jabalpur MP jay hind jay Bharat
@@ehteshamabedin1493 Hope the Marxist gate keepers had the audacity to rebuttal through critical academic work to the luminaries I have stated above ... Stop using ad hominem
Creating right understanding of history. A wonderful discussion. History is a subject and not a tool used for propaganda specially religious and political. Thank you lallantop for this presentation. Great work keep it up.
50:45 सम्राट अशोक ब्राह्मण नहीं थे, इसलिए ब्राह्मणी को अशोक में सुंदरता नज़र नहीं आई।
मगर शारीरिक रूप से आठ जगहों से टेढे़मेडे अष्टावक्र 'ब्राह्मण' थे; वो सभी ब्राह्मणों को रूप-लावण्य से कामदेव से भी सुंदर नज़र आते हैं। जिनमें टेढ़ापन की बजाय ब्राह्मणत्व का ब्रह्मज्ञान नजर आता है।
Sahi pakde 👌👌👌👌👍👍👍
सही कहा c grade ब्राह्मणवादी इतिहासकार है ये रुचिका शर्मा,जिसे सौरभ द्विवेदी प्रख्यात कर रहा है।
uski maa brahmin thi bosrikey...
Moorkh asthavakra ka matlab hi hai 8 jagaho se tedameda. Uska matlab kaamdev nhi hota
ये दोनों ही हमेशा से जातिवाद के खिलाफ रहे हैं लेकिन तुम जैसे मंदबुद्धि अपने आप को साबित कर ही देते हो पहले भी मूर्ख थे आज भी मूर्ख हो
जैसे ही रोमिला थापर का नाम लिया मैने सुनना छोड़ दिया। जिसे फारसी नही संस्कृत नही आती। वह इतिहासकार है मध्य काल की। धन्य है आपका ज्ञान। जो इतिहासकार है उनका क्या इतिहास है बहुत महत्वपूर्ण होता है।
जे एन यू से पी एच डी की है भाई और क्या उम्मीद करेगा
@41:00 is fun to watch counter question by Saurabh according to her and her Guru Romila thapar, she is saying only those account will be taken in which destruction has taken place so Hindus were worshipping manath as Shiva and what about our account of Jyoterling will not be taken into consideration. So where is jyoterling name Somnath is??
Jabhi to Samarkand ko Iran bata rahe he
@@jitendrasinghjadaun670 thoda acche se dekho ky bat ho rhi hai fir kro cmmant
तभी तो सभी मुगलिया राक्षसों को थे थे सम्मान जनक के रूप में परोस रही है
धरती खोदकर देखो बुद्ध ही बुद्ध मिलेगे
विश्व विजेता अशोक सम्राट को जीतने वाला भी बुद्ध धर्म है ❤️❤️❤️❤️
मुर्दे हमेसा जमीन के अंदर ही मिलते हे
Aaj Tak to nahi mile 😂😂
@@mb-hb1fr tumko kuch pata hi nhi hai
@@UPSCWALLAH-zf8zu bhai kahi nahi mile aur Gautam budh khud bhi hindu hi the.
@@mb-hb1fr pahli baat Hindu koi dharm nhi hai 🤣
Aap current affair ki class Kiya Karo aapko pata chal jayega
Nalanda University ki khudai kare to pata nhi kitne Buddha melege
The most judicious historian
Dr.ms sharma having sufficient
Knowledge of Persian,English,
Hindi language expressed relevant Indian history.
I salute young historian.
From r r chishti
Advocate.
Dr: sharma .. i really liked her way of giving historical information...great ..thanks to lallantop
चाहे जहां जितनी भी खुदाइ, अध्ययन करलो तथागत बुद्ध , सम्राट अशोक ही मिलेंगे।
सत्यमेव जयते
Nepal main hi milega aur kuch Bihar main,baki jagha 🙄 nahi ok
yah farji Ruchika Sharma bhi Jhooth bol rahi hai aur tum Khud bhi Jahan khodo vahan Budh Nahin Nikalti Hai yah jhuthi bakwas hai puratatvik proof prachur Matra Mein Bharat mein hai Sab padh lo sab hindu dharm Se Hi nikala hai Prachin❤farji itihaaskar Ko to Mein Khud proof ke sath bakaiti band kar sakta hu Bade channel per Jise Koi Aata Jata Nahin Aise farji Logon Ko Bitha Lete HainHam mante Hain Ki Ruchika Sharma ka gyan madhyakaalin ka hairecent history ka gyan Nahin Hai To usmein kudna Nahin
लगता तुम भी भीम मीम की पाठशाला के विद्यार्थी हो ,जो जाहिल जरूर हो।
@@buntyghosh4959ek ashoka area jara Google kr k dekho to ....😂
वो भगवान् महावीर हैं। बुद्ध कल्पनिक है चोरी की है जैन धर्म की।
Whenever she becomes nervous she start playing with her hair. 43:29 .When Saurabh asked "गजनी ख़ुद क्या लिखता है?" and then she get nervous and start playing with her hair.
Bilkul Sahi behaviour pakdo to pata chal jata hai jhoot bol rahi ye ya to iske pas evidence aur knowledge nahi hai
इस कार्यक्रम को बनाने, यूट्यूब पर पेश करने के लिए लल्लनटॉप और होस्ट रुचिका शर्मा जी का शुक्रिया, Thanks ,
Thank you lallantop for this type of interview . Kindly provide more interviews of historians .
Distorians 😂
At 42:39 Saurabh asked her question about which source is authentic and she was visibly stumped and struggled, though she got back to her foot quickly but the damage is done. Also she not expecting Saurabh to cross question
Lmao true
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL
Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
@@varahmihir4575than why she is misleading
Because she is JNU ki paidaish and dwiedi to hai hi to soft core dikha rha hai c
26:17 to 26:43 madam Mohamad Tuglak ki tareef karte nahi thkti aur mahan batarhi hai logo ko kahrhi hiki log kisi ko bhi vilan bana detehai
32:35 to 33:30 ke beech ye madam Darashikho ko alcoholic bekar batati hai aur Aurangzeb mahan aur aacha batane ki kosis karti dikh rhi hai ,
Is vido me ye madam mugal sultano ko mahan aur aacha batane ke chakr me is had tak chli gai ki kah diya ki mugal time me sati pratha ke instances bhut kam ho gaye the kyno ki mugal badsah is jaghanya apradh ko kma kiya jasake.
Isse aur age badhkar Madane to mugal badsao ki tareef me ye tak kah diya ki badsah bhart ki janta ke Religion par anch nahi anedena chate the(jis tuglak aur aurang jeb ne bhart ke religion aur mandiro ko toda tabah kiya logo ko talvar ke dam par convert karne par majboor kiya vo bhart ke logo ke religion par anch tak nahi ane dena chate the). Inki mansikta isse hi samajh ajati hai ?
MAdam pure video me kuch references dene ke nam par sirf kuch nam leti dikhti hi par correct reference nahi deti. isme ye kisi travler, kisi fari mugal ya muslim ka nam leti hai ya kisi book ya writer ke nam lete diki par khana par likhahai aisa correct refrance nahi deti dikhi sayd ye janti haiki koi bhi itna time lekar nhi baitha ki jakr un sab refrances ko dhundne jayega ?
ua-cam.com/video/_jie_DRgWX8/v-deo.html, aur jada jankari ke liye inke diye refrances ko dhyan se dkehe bhut khuc miljayga, inke twwitter account me inke followers aur ye kinko follow karte hi to sayd agenda samajh sakte hi sayd?
Romila Thaapar was recently talking about Yuthisthir in Ashoka time, which was hilarious. 😂😂So definitely her work should be thoroughly checked just as she suggested academically, but the problem is whenever someone tries to do that, their whole professional attacks collectively on befalf of her. 😅😅
Ha yrrr Inka kux interconnect n ho pa rhi history 😂......inki thisis to hmari graduation ki copy ki trh hogi
ua-cam.com/video/nOh5I21Ff1A/v-deo.html
Yudhistar we don't have proof but we have proof of Indus Valley Civilization.
@@ankitjain3760 but here I am, talking about two time periods. I am not here asking her to have proof about whether Mahabharat or Budhha really existed or not ?😂😂 You are not getting my point here. Moreover, she is not an expert for Indus Valley history. She hasn't included any archeological proofs for her books of history with respect to the medieval period. I have read her books. Moreover, this lady in the video is so deceptive and cunning. I just asked her about Nalanda University timeline of destruction because it's actually officially available on the Bihar ASI website that it was destroyed by Bakhityar Khilji. When I sent that ASI official link to this moron student of Romila Thaapar, She blocked me.
What time period was Yudhistir around? Also what time period were people able to perform magic and then forgot how to do that?
Now I can see how historian can change history..
Haa😂😂
Now I can see how an andhbhakt can create a new narrative and blame historians
@@sanojkumar-mv2mk haa! Somnath me Arabic Goddess ko pooja jata tha! Tum yahi dekho aur mano!! Waah bete! Tumse tez to saala Einstein bhi nahi tha!
@@msdadsfsx Tu apni degree bata be!
She is a well known Hindu hater & arab invaders worshipper. You may go through her tweeter which is full of propaganda.
शिवपुराण में द्वादश ज्योतिर्लिंग है 14 नहीँ
श्लोक प्रारम्भ ही सुनें
सौराष्ट्र च सोमनाथे श्री शैले मल्लिकार्जुनम
उज्जैनम महाकल् म ओमकार ममलेश्वरम
परालयम च वैधनात्म डाकिनयं भीमाशंकरम
अंतिम यह है
हिमालय तू केदारम घ्रसनेस्वर शिवालय
12 ज्योतिर्लिंग सभी प्राचीन शास्त्रों में
Somnath “Somesvara” temple is located in Prabhas Patan on coastline of Saurashtra. In Vana Parva of Mahabharat there is a mention of a pilgrim site (Tirtha) in Prabhasa Pattana. In Shiv Purana the 1st Jyotirlinga is mentioned as Prabhasa Pattana. But Ruchika wants to refer only Farsi sources and Romila Thapars research thesis.
Left wing historian 😂😂
@@RahulKumar-dh6uc *distorian
Romilla thappar👎 koh toh ek ZORRR KI THAPPARR? 👋KI SAKHHHTTT ZAROORAT HAI😡TABHI USS BUDHHOO BUDHIYA KI NARYALL KHOPRI MEIN KUCH BHEJAA AAYEGA😡
@@sandeepram2289👍RIGHT WORD BRO "DISTORIAN"👎
ISS GADHI LADY NE TOHH... CHANDRASHEKHAR🌙BHAGWAAN BHAIRAVV KO SOM🌙NATH SE
"LADY SU- MANAAT" ...
..BANA DIYA AORR UPARR SE YEHH BHI KEHH RAHI HAI KI ISSSEYY BADI GADHEE LADY ROMILLA THAAPAR👎 NE "BAHUT ACHHI KITAAB LIKHE HAI"
sacch mein gadheeyon ke sirr parr seenghh nahin hote 😡🌛
इतिहास समझने जैसे आप फारसी सीख लेती है
और रोमिला थापर आपसे ज्येष्ठ होकर इस देश के इतिहास को समझने संस्कृत सीखे बगैर इतिहास गढ लेती है, कमाल है
Abe gipu Sanskrit 9th century after milti he usse pahle pali prakrit kharosti Greek farsi 😂😂
''Phd Scholar'' ua-cam.com/video/j8TNPlE5omA/v-deo.html
@@PHYSMATH29 Abe chu chu .... Sanskrit is 5000 year old...tum to 1500 sal pehle registan me nange ghumte the ..ha ha
Watch reality of Islam on Exmuslim channel on youtube.
Ex muslim sahil
Exmuslim sameer
Ex muslim deeni bhai
Adam seeker
Sachwala
@@PHYSMATH29 achcha to Tibet mein mili kalp vigrah murti ke saath jo tamr Patra Mila Jo ki sanskrit mein likha hua tha voh 32000 varsh Purana keise saabit hua.
Ye investigation CIA-america ne ki hei meine nahi dekhlo.
@@PHYSMATH29 tu naya chuitya mila bhai or upsc ki tyari kaar ra hai... abe sanskrit 1400 sal se bhu jayda purani hai ..
As she is trying keep positive image of Ghajini that he was destroying SOMNATH temple bcz he took it as su-manath. I am very sure she must have some positive arguement for Bhaktiyar khilji about destroying Nalanda University.
first of all tell me who was Khalji and Ghajni from where did they came and where did they belong from? You are a big naive gobarbhakt to put both together.
Going by your logic, Arabic world should bomb mongolia because Genghis laid their city into rubles.
Prove her wrong with facts. Otherwise no value of ur thoughts.
@@chesstimenytime6994 let's assume what if Ghanjini didn't take it as su-manath then would he have destroyed Somnath? What do you think? Answer it with logic
@@kallolpoetry Mahmud ghazni was a Turkish slave soldier and he took control of Ghazni in 998.
@@kallolpoetryAnd I am not putting khilji and Ghazni together, I am putting theirs logic behind massacre and loot together and the logic was Islam. Tumhare Abbajaan ke pitaji bhi kabhi gobarbhakt hua krte the lekin afsos ab tum sab katwe ho gye ho.
Very good & infmativ episode Thankyou I hope 2nd episode we are seen very soon
50:30 ब्रह्म और ब्रह्मा में अन्तर पता नहीं हैं इन इतिहासकार को 😂😂
She is brainwashed by Persian language.
आपका timestamp सही नहीं है शायद 58:30 है शायद लेकिन वो जीभ फिसलना माना जा सकता है। वैसे भी वो इतिहासकार (Historian) हैं धर्म विशेषज्ञ (Theologist) नहीं।
Jo pehle ja man chuka ki mujhe ni samjhna to bhai usko to nai samjhaya ja shakta
@@AshutoshRaghuwanshiस्वः घोषित इतिहासकार है ये इसे कुछ आता जाता नहीं है बस कुछ इतिहास की क्लास अटैंड की है इसने।
@@Sabkipolekholegaapunस्वः घोषित इतिहासकार है ये इसे कुछ आता जाता नहीं है बस कुछ इतिहास की क्लास अटैंड की है इसने।
Open Challenge To Bramhaani Madam Ji Debate To Science Journey ...
Science journey doesn't even talk about science lol 😂
यहां सुनकर देखकर एक राय तो पक्का बन रही, कि सुनाने वाला या लिखने वाला खुद भृमित हो तो सामने वाले को अपने पर विश्वास ना करने की वजह दे बैठता है। और कुछ इतिहासकार या कोई भी लेखक अपनी बात को स्पष्टता, प्रमाणिक और वजनदार तरीके से रखे तो असत्य इतिहास भी विश्वसनीय लगने लगता है।
बिलकुल सही कहा भाई आपने यहाँ कुछ ऐसा ही है
if prophet born in india then - “The Prophet [ﷺ] married Aisha when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.” - The revered Sahih al-Bukhari, 5134; Book 67, Hadith 70.
Section 375(6): Rape (under eighteen years of age)
Different punishments have been decided foe rape of women in different ages. Rape of women under 16 years of age: Rigorous imprisonment of not less than 20 years/ life and fine.
he is not suitable for modern world even today muslim is good then prophet
Why i right Indian law beacause muslim belive he is ideal man for all time and follow him and his did is sunna part of Islam , what prophet did is halal for every muslim . So if Sharia law implement then merrige 6 year child is valid that country if they follow real Sharia.
इस्लामिक मकसद ही हत्याएं लूट बलात्कार काफिर वाजिबल कत्ल है
फिर संदेह कैसा , मल तो मल ही है
Gobarbhakt you want read only those history where your mythological religion and ridiculous culture will glorify
आज तक चैनल को वैसे भी कहते हैं अमेरिकी जासूसी संस्था सीआईए का चैनल है इसका काम केवल हिंदुओं को गुलाम बनाए रखना है किस तरह से मांडू का ही हुआ एक नई नवली पीएचडी स्कॉलर को बुला लिया गया जिसके अभी सिर्फ सबमिट हुई है एक्सेप्ट नहीं हुई है आखिर उसमें क्या इतनी खास बात देखी जा रही है जी हां औरंगजेब का महिमा मंडल करना था हिंदुओं सावधान आज तक से
ऐसा नहीं लगता, इस विडियो का टाइटल *इतिहासकार* न होकर *स्टाइलिस इतिबदलहासकार* होना चाहिए!😊
😂😂😂😂
Yes, truly guessed.
आप क्या इतिहासकार हैं
It is ridiculous. Was there any goddess named Manat in the ancient or medieval India? But Siva was there all the time. To say that Somnath was Su Manat is like saying there is possibility of finding a temple of David in ancient India. Salute such historical scholarship!
She is an excellent story teller, devoid of facts. Sometimes it borders on nonsense and ridiculous.
Lallantop toh bese bhi leftist ko hin pyaar karta hai 😅😅..esen hin dikha dia
I will just clarify. The goddess is talking about is one that belongs to pre Islam era. She was one of the three chieftains of Mecca City along with her two sisters. Alat and Aluzza. She is very sacred to Persians historically. I guess that is what she is referring to
Lallan top is in love Muslims and Rahul Gandhi .... makes sense their hosts have similar views ... Ruchika must have muslin boy friend ... that is my guess ..LOL
@@ssrwarrior7978 🤣🤣bhai calm rehle jitna prove mila hai utna bata rahi hai w
भारत का असली इतिहास जानना हो तो science journey sir के पास जाइए सबूतों और तथ्यो के साथ
Reservation wala hai kya!?
Asli nahe jutha etihas jhandu journey batat hai.app asli etihas ko janty hai to ek bar sanatan sameksh chanel par jarur aye
तू ही गांड़ में साइंस जर्नी वाले chutiye से
@@whatajoke2357 इंटीना(भीकसा म देहि) वाला है क्या 😁😁
@@whatajoke2357 तुम भीकसा देहि वाले हो सायद 😁🤣🤣🤣 इसलिए science से जल रही है 😁🙄🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Saurabh guru history se anjaan hone ki acting gajab kiya hai..... information nikalvane aur disscsion ko intresting banane k liye......👏👏👏👏
आज तक चैनल को वैसे भी कहते हैं अमेरिकी जासूसी संस्था सीआईए का चैनल है इसका काम केवल हिंदुओं को गुलाम बनाए रखना है किस तरह से मांडू का ही हुआ एक नई नवली पीएचडी स्कॉलर को बुला लिया गया जिसके अभी सिर्फ सबमिट हुई है एक्सेप्ट नहीं हुई है आखिर उसमें क्या इतनी खास बात देखी जा रही है जी हां औरंगजेब का महिमा मंडल करना था हिंदुओं सावधान आज तक से
बहुत ही बेहतरीन चर्चा रहीं, शायद सौरभ जी की आज तक की मेरी देखी हुई सभी चर्चाओं में सब से बेहतर होगी, इतिहास कभी जीवित नहीं होता, और कभी मरता भी नहीं। मलाल बस इस बात का हैँ की ये चर्चा तक पहुंचने में मुझे साल भर का समय लगा।
बैठकी बहुत सुंदर था आपका,
कृपया इसे जारी रखें।
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद।
कह रही है इतिहास को इतिहास की दृष्टि से देखिए, न की धार्मिक जातीय या अन्य दृष्टि से
जबकि खुद ही दो तीन जगह जातीय दृष्टि से विश्लेषण कर दिया
Brahman propoganda Bhai
Itihas me to ab sab kuch cover karna padega na 😂,, sirf dharm ki drishti se dekho ge to andho me aur tumme kya fark hai 😂
madam muglo ko mahan aur bhart aur bartio ko nicha dikhati dikhtihi poore videos me inka youtube dekkar lagtahi ki sayd kisi toolkit ka hissa ho?
मेरे तो धारना ही बदल गई yar पहले पता था कि इतिहास बहुत गलत लिखा हुआ होता है इसलिए अब तो इतिहास से मन ही उठ गया है कि कौन बेहतर था और कौन अच्छा
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL
Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
भाई चेहरा खूबसूरत होने जाने से व्यक्ति ज्ञानी नहीं बन जाता है.. रिसर्चर नहीं बन जाता है , यही बात यूपीएससी में है सुंदर-सुंदर लड़कियों को इंटरव्यू लेने वाले अच्छा नंबर दे देते हैं.
मैं यह पहली बार सुन रहा हूं कि मंदिरों में कारखाने होते थे!!!! यह इतिहास की प्रोफेसर नहीं कहानी की प्रोफेसर है।
और लल्लनटॉप वाले तो एक नंबर के ठरकी हैं. यह करते ही ऐसा काम है जिसका चेहरा खूबसूरत हो उसको बुलाकर इंटरव्यू लेते रहते हैं।
Andh bhagat ho bhai
देख रहे हो बिनोद तेमुर आये थे। अशोक चंडाल कुरुप था।😡😡😡
असोक पूरे विश्व में इतिहास का सबसे महान राजा है।
Science journey ne exposed Kiya hai isko proof ke sath
@@exactlearner6329 Right
Science journey se Ruchika sharma debate kr le with evidence
@@ASHISHSINGH-ot6mg bhai tumne mere Mann ki baat keh di.
शर्मा मैम को बहुत-बहुत साधुवाद गुर्जर हिस्ट्री सारगर्भित तरीके से बताने के लिए कोटि-कोटि आभार आपका 💐🙏
Sharma mam 20% sach hai 80% juht bol rahi hai
लेकीन वह तो कह रही है की सोमनाथ का मंदिर गुर्जर कुरियर वालो ने।लुटा😅
Don't tell spicy stories please deliver History as it is mam. And also don't tell people like... "that would have been happened" Rather quote actual facts so that people will know it clearly. And I would suggest that bring experts who have properly read and decoded these inscriptions and archaeologists and not Historians. And finally GET WELL SOON LALLANTOP.
Wonderful discussion 🎉🎉🎉 Very enlightening, a must watch for all educated Indians.
Body language is understandable about agenda.
This is what jnu agenda.
Recently started watching lallantop .
It is very interesting to see this lady have great respect for Moghals and her mental position for Great Ashok, etc.
Bade geyaani hai aap ko bhut geyaan hai history main jo hua wo sab aap ko malum hai
Sab ka knowledge leya karo jo admi apne knowledge ko final shamjhta hai wo kya houta hai boulna zarure nahi hai
@@hotelsilverpalace3878 bhaiya inko mat samjhao, unke paas Roz history wale msg aate hai WhatsApp par, bahot Gyan milta h waha i.e. 80 kilo ka bhala etc..😂
@@hotelsilverpalace3878 buddhi k balm....Hai uske paas knowledge.....sala usko debate k liye challenge karta hai to chup jati hai....aur source Dene bolo ki khud k likhe hue yaa uske connections Wale ne like hue chuje ka article deti hai chaman
@@ImranKhan-he8bdJinka 610CE se pehele existantce nhi tha vo kripaya history k bare main naa hi bole to theek hoga🤣🤣🤣
@@ImranKhan-he8bdsahi kaha
आपके चरण स्पर्श बहन जी 🙏🏼🙏🏼गुर्जरों के अति विशालकाय एवं वैभवशाली इतिहास को बताने के लिए🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@madan123xyz भाई आपसे पूर्णतः सहमत हूँ। मानवता श्रेष्ठ है लेकिन किसी के पूर्वजों को दूसरे के बताने से वैमन्सयता का भाव जाग्रत होता है।गुर्जर, जाट,राजपूत व अहीर सभी क्षत्रिय वर्ण की मराठा और ठाकुर etc. महान उपाधियों से सुशोभित जातियां रहीं हैं और भाई इतिहास में जो जिस वंश का है वो सब लिख कर गए हैं तत्कालीन स्त्रोत भी हैं, अब आधुनिक जगत भी है और वैसे जातिवाद सबसे बड़ा ज़हर है इसे खत्म होना चाहिए और तत्कालीन समय में जो जिस वंश का था उसे उसी प्रकार सम्मान देना जरूरी है,सत्य रुपी शब्दों और सम्मान से सही इतिहास लिखकर असत्य को बदलना चाहिए। जो कर्नल टॉड ने जातिवादी मानसिकता में 900 वर्षों के महान गुर्जर कुषाण, गुर्जर हूण व गुर्जर प्रतिहार और उनके गुर्जर सामंतों को राजपूत बताकर विशालकाय गुर्जर इतिहास में भ्रम पैदा करने का काम किया वो गलत है
@@madan123xyz par Dynasty bhi jati ke nam par padi h
@@968avtar सब विदेशी हो हूण कुषाण गुर्जर…घुसपैठिए रबात इंस्क्रिप्शन पढ़ो कनिष्क के समरकंद के भगोड़े 😂😂
रबात इंस्क्रिप्शन पोल खुल रही है तुम्हारे पूर्वजों की ua-cam.com/video/7H7NR_rMeis/v-deo.html
@@nsentertainment8976 बिल्कुल भाई जी पाणिनि ने यही कहा है की dynasty और क्षेत्र का नाम जाति के आधार पर पड़ता है
@@nsentertainment8976 बिल्कुल भाई,गुर्जर जाति से गुर्जर राष्ट्र / गुजरात (आधुनिक गुजरात,मध्य प्रदेश, महाराष्ट्र राजस्थान etc.),राजपूत से राजपुताना etc.
भाई साहब!आप क्या दिखाना चाहते हैं? अब हमें रोमिला थापर के इतिहास से परहेज करना चाहिए। रुचिका ने बड़े सफाई के साथ अंग्रेज़ इतिहासकारों को विलेन और रोमिला थापर का महिमामंडन कर दिया। यही तो जेएनयू है।
Angrez ko villain bnane pr ap ko jo bura lga
Is baat se apke rss wale hone ka pta chalta h
Watch #Rational_World
@@elyazazhari2505 aur crusade ka sunke tumko bura laga😂
Angrejo ne likha hi galat hai
Sahi bola aapne
इनको इतिहास में फिर से स्नातक करनी चाहिए, स्नातक स्तर का लेवल भी इनके पास नहीं है। चंद अरबी फारसी शब्द को जान लेने से कोई इतिहासकार नहीं हो सकता। हास्यास्पद ज्ञान। इस मंच पर पहली बार इतना कम स्तर का इतिहास पर बातचीत सुनना पड़ा
She admitted, she does not know Sanskrit. And then she says, "A historian can be illiterate, why bother about education?". LOL
Also, she translates "Chand/Chandi" to "ugly. But actually "chandi" means "fierce", not ugly. LOL!
Average historian
इसको स्थानों के नाम तो ढंग से लेने नही आते, इतिहासकार क्या ही बनेगी।
Ha ye kuchh ni janti comment krne wale sab bade se bade itihaskar h😅😅 chahe 1 kitaab bhi na padhi ho... Isliye hum sab comment mein bhonk rhe h aur wo waha bethi h
मैडम इतनी अच्छी तरह से बता रही हैं मानो कुतुबुद्दीन तैमूर खिलजी सभी ने आक्रमण और मार काट कर के इस देश पर बहुत बड़ा अहसान किया है।
जे एन यू की शिक्षा को सलाम।
Dallantop 😂
26:17 to 26:43 madam Mohamad Tuglak ki tareef karte nahi thkti aur mahan batarhi hai logo ko kahrhi hiki log kisi ko bhi vilan bana detehai
32:35 to 33:30 ke beech ye madam Darashikho ko alcoholic bekar batati hai aur Aurangzeb mahan aur aacha batane ki kosis karti dikh rhi hai ,
Is vido me ye madam mugal sultano ko mahan aur aacha batane ke chakr me is had tak chli gai ki kah diya ki mugal time me sati pratha ke instances bhut kam ho gaye the kyno ki mugal badsah is jaghanya apradh ko kma kiya jasake.
Isse aur age badhkar Madane to mugal badsao ki tareef me ye tak kah diya ki badsah bhart ki janta ke Religion par anch nahi anedena chate the(jis tuglak aur aurang jeb ne bhart ke religion aur mandiro ko toda tabah kiya logo ko talvar ke dam par convert karne par majboor kiya vo bhart ke logo ke religion par anch tak nahi ane dena chate the). Inki mansikta isse hi samajh ajati hai ?
MAdam pure video me kuch references dene ke nam par sirf kuch nam leti dikhti hi par correct reference nahi deti. isme ye kisi travler, kisi fari mugal ya muslim ka nam leti hai ya kisi book ya writer ke nam lete diki par khana par likhahai aisa correct refrance nahi deti dikhi sayd ye janti haiki koi bhi itna time lekar nhi baitha ki jakr un sab refrances ko dhundne jayega ?
ua-cam.com/video/_jie_DRgWX8/v-deo.html, aur jada jankari ke liye inke diye refrances ko dhyan se dkehe bhut khuc miljayga, inke twwitter account me inke followers aur ye kinko follow karte hi to sayd agenda samajh sakte hi sayd?
😅😅
@@HarshRaj-e3gtoh jao, republic tv ko chaanto
सही शिक्षा कहां मिलती है BHU हिंदुओं का महिमामंडन करेगी
Baithki ka ye episode with historian Ruchika Sharma, kaafi achcha laga. Kaafi saare misconception clear huye. Apne desh history k baare kaafi sara jaane ko mila. Hoping ki aise aur jyada episodes hone chahiye.
Timur is a national hero in Uzbekistan. Samarkand is in Uzbekistan, not in Iran, though the region is a part of erstwhile Persia. Timurs most famous monuments are probably in present day Uzbekistan.
Crusaders came from all over Europe. Not just Spain and Italy. They came from eastern Europe, Germany, france and from the British isles. The knights came in huge numbers. And Richard the lion heart, who fought the third crusade was the king of England.
If I am not mistaken, Babar (founder of Mughal dynasty in India) was born in Andijan, Uzbekistan. He is i think buried there.
@@2sridharkBabur was buried in Kabul
Fantastic... I learned a lot n enjoyed this whole discussion on History. Learned but don't conclude .
Science Journey se debate kijiye...
Saar debate science journey plumber saar , saar please saar Buddhism older than Hinduism saar
सोमनाथ मंदिर के नीचे तो कुछ और ही है जो दबाया गया है इतिहास तो असली अभी तक बाहर आने ही नहीं दिया गया!! भारत के लोग हिंदू बने घूम रहे हैं, उनको पता ही नहीं है। उनका धर्म कौन सा है?
#Rational_World #Science_Journey
Sunday Tuesday Thursday
Time 07:00pm
Or tum sanatan samiksha dekho beta
Hindu to hindu hi h ,samjhe Buddhists scientist 🤣🤣
@@vishalbabu1253
Wo Koun Hai???????
सोमनाथ मंदिर नहीं बल्कि एक बुद्धिष्ट मठ है । नीचे के तीन तल बुद्धिस्ट आर्किटेक्चर एवं बुद्धिस्ट मूर्तियाँ है । यही हाल भारत के सभी प्राचीन मंदिरों का है । बुद्धिस्ट मथो पर क़ब्ज़ा कर के मंदिर बता दिया गया है ।
@@President233 बुद्ध केवल एक मार्ग है धर्म नही..
धर्म तो एक ही है हिंदू जिससे बुद्ध पी पैदा हुवे जैन भी उसी से पैदा हुए या सिख या विश्व के अन्य धर्म..
बहुत धन्यवाद इस बैठकी का
मन नहीं भरा
इतंजार रहेगा अगली इतिहास की बैठकी का
💐🙏❤
मैं तो टकटकी लगाकर प्रोफेसर रुचिका शर्मा को सुनता गया और सौरभ द्विवेदी जी के प्रश्नों ने जिज्ञासा में हिजाफ़ा किया । धन्यवाद lallantop बैठकी प्रोग्राम
अशोक के बारे मे इतना बोल मुझे ऐसा लगा 🙄 हिमालय को रुमाल से थक दिया 🙄🙄
Ruchika Sharma वाकई talent इतिहासविद हैं बिलाशक मेरी ओर से उनको बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद 🙏
Bhrman gapod isko askoa pata nahi tha chala gapodne engraz train dake gaye iski aukd nahi chala ghyan batne Tum logo ki aukad pata chalalge ashoka kay barame bolte ho science journey UA-cam channel ref Sjl245 time 2.52 .0
ये देखो जिस असोक का 1915 से पहले भारत के लोग नाम तक नहीं जानते थे उसके नाम पर तरह तरह की कहानियां बना दी गई... असोक को अशोक लिखने लगे इतिहासकार. ..और जिस असोक के 40 के करीब अभिलेखों और स्तंभों की भाषा पाली को अंग्रेजों ने रिसर्च के बाद पढ़ना संभव किया उस असोक पर तरह तरह की कहानियां आज ब्राह्मण इतिहासकार गढ़ कर भ्रम फैला रहे हैं! असोक से इतना डर? क्यों? असल मे जिनके अपने इतिहास का अता पता नहीं हो वो ही दूसरों के इतिहास को बिगाड़कर अपनी कुंठा निकालते हैं! हिंदू धर्म, वैदिक काल , ब्राह्मण ...इन सबका इतिहास ढूंढ कर दिखाओ तुममे दम हो तो....चाहो भी तो नहीं दिखा सकते दुनिया को. . जब है ही नहीं कुछ 10 वीं सदी के पहले का तुम्हारा तो दिखाओगे क्या!
Damdaar baat 👍👍👍👌👌👌
बहुत अच्छे
Very good information of true history and it's very intersting.I love Lollantop channel
सौरभ साहब हम भी इतिहास के बहुत जानकार हैं लेकिन यह एपिसोड देखने के बाद ऐसा लगा कि हम विद्यार्थी है बहुत-बहुत धन्यवाद
Can see that she has studied at JNU.
Ignore twelve jyotirling.
Go by Romila Thapar who says Somnath was not a Shiva temple.
Ignore inconvenient issues from Goan king’s description from his Somnath visit.
On Mandu, quickly dismiss contribution of Parmars and straight go to the Muslim rulers. Ignore breaking of temples and create confusion about temples being palace.
Exactly. Can't even speak "parmar" word properly.
And then blaming Britishers for declaring Mughals "barbarian". Where she'll direct our future generation. I pity on her
Is aurat ko Afghanistan bhejna chahiye yeh badi jahil hai
अशोका पहले से बौद्ध थे ना की हिंदू से बौद्ध बने .अगर वो पहले हिंदू थे? तो साइंस जर्नी पे डिबेट करो।🙏🙏
Science Journey ua-cam.com/users/live3C0_YpSt-vk?feature=share
Sahi baat bole 👌👌👌👌
Short way to know better than lies of lallantop. ua-cam.com/users/live2I2wyUAQxwM?feature=share
Inki aukat nhi h darte h sab
ua-cam.com/users/live2I2wyUAQxwM?feature=share
Let's discuss this here 👍
Romila Thapar's book on Somnath taken as reference 😂😂
Should she take WhatsApp as reference then? Like right wingers do?
Tu agar 100 mar ke jee bhi jaye, tabhi Romila Thapar jitni research nahi kar sakti, moorkh
बहुत ही ज्ञानी इतिहास कार लल्लनटाप साधुवाद चर्चा कराने के लिए। इतिहास अध्ययन के सभी पक्षों का सही विश्लेषण।🙏
गज़ब 👌👌👌 मैं एक upsc एस्पियंट हूं,मेरा जब भी मध्यकाल हिस्ट्री पढ़ने का मन करेगा ,में ये वीडियो देख लूंगा😂
मैडम कपूडगाथा मत सुनाइए. पीएचडी कर रहे हो या स्पाइडर मेन, बैटमैन की कहानियाँ बना रही हो. हिस्ट्री को सही से पढ़िए. रुट लेवल तक जाइए. बकवास स्टोरी कोई सुनेगा नहीं.अगर डिबेट करनी है ओपन प्लेटफार्म पर कीजिये. पता चल जायेगा कितनी हिस्ट्री आती है.
अगर आपने कोई गलतियां बताई होती तो शायद एक चर्चा शुरू हो सकती थी। पर जिस जाहिलाना अंदाज में आपने अपनी नापसंदगी दिखाई है उसको नज़रंदाज़ करने के अलावा और कुछ नहीं किया जा सकता है।
👍👍👍👍@@bindaastwo
Bakwas toh tumne usse zada kar di. Instead of countering her logically, you started gibberish, so what's the point? You could expose her lies right away but you don't have the guts to do it, do you?
@@VergeWithFacebookइसका मतलब तूने मान लिया की ये महिला बकवास ही करती है।
@@WalletmoneyOnline You aren't the sharpest tool in the box, are you mate? I used his "words" - bakwas to expose his "hypocrisy" doesn't mean I said wo bakwas kar ri h. I liked how you cherry picked the sentence to answer, that speaks volume.
Good interview. Good questions and vivid explanations.
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Smartest people are never afraid to look stupid. Saurabh knows this. He mixes his curiosity with stupid innocence making the guest feel more like a teacher. I refuse to believe that anything she told Saurabh didn't know beforehand because he reads too much. Other thing, really amazing to see a young woman historian. Being a history scholar myself, I really 'liked' her.
Young Propgandist distorian
typical librandu teenager....
Saurabh is so learned, that he deliberately interrupts the lady when she talks about Allauddin Khilji coming from Afghanistan saying the film showed Jamaluddin coming thus correcting her and then she eventually told the sequence….
Great, thanks to anchor, lallantop and Ruchika mam to enhance my history knowledge....
इतिहासकार जो अलग अलग राजसत्ता के समकालीन थे, उन्होंने कहीं न कहीं अपनी राजसत्ताओं की चाटुकारिता जरूर की होगी, मोंन्युमोंट भी कहीं न कहीं राजसत्ताओं की अतिरेक प्रशस्ति का ही प्रतीक है. विज्ञान और तकनीक, कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता से उमींद है सही इतिहास जानने को मिल पायेगा. रुचिका जी, सौरभ जी को इस मंथनीय संवाद हेतु धन्यवाद।
Ye episode ab tak ka ekmaatr episode hai jo muze lagta tha ki kabhi khatam hi na ho❤
मैडम ने मांडू में महादेव मंदिर निर्माण का उल्लेख की लेकिन सरस्वती मंदिर के तोड़े जाने की चर्चा नहीं की।
इसके सारे रेफरेंस फेक हैँ।
Ruchika Sharma sees everything from Brahminical gaze, incomplete view of everything !!
भारत के सारे मंदिर बौद्ध स्तूप बौद्ध विहार हैं.
Acha 😂
😂😂 wo Buddhism bad me aya
Very informative…..❤
What a conviction and confidence this lady has about her subject ...so good
Kya kisi muslim ladki ne hindu raja se shadi ki ha history ya sirf hindu ladkiyo ne hi muslim se shadi ki thi .
gadhe understand what you writting.....dont write this lie
@@sonuchaudhary5139 Hindus are cowards , mean ,and self centered ..
@@sonuchaudhary5139niece of Akbar married Raja Mann Singh
@@sonuchaudhary5139mastani married to peshwa bajirao.
Historians usually are divided in to 3:-
1) Ancient
2) Medieval
3) Modern
And Ms. Ruchika is a Medieval historian with some knowledge or info overlapping at both ends (start of medieval period & end of medieval period).
Kaalchakra 🚩
Ye jnu brand certain agenda chalanevale log he jisne desh ko barbad kiya
😅 ----ea professor leftists Hai aur es SE AAP agar sunte ho ke shreemad Muhammad ghori tab bhi ascharjya mat hona........................=
So, ea Lipapoti PE expert Hai lallan top
Aur professors ki Lipapoti
Kya BAAT Hai..........._
So, avir ne slmnath ko luta par shreemad Muhammad ghori ne behi Wah re divedi aur WA re lady professor
😊 Increcpttion aur Lipapoti 😊😅😅😅
Hahahah
Keep it up Ruchika jee
Great information.
आखिर कह दिया ना आजके सब हिन्दू देव-देवी महायान बुद्धिस्म से ही आया है!
रान्डेल कोलिन्स कहते हैं कि " भारतीय समाज के लिए बुनियादी सांस्कृतिक ढांचा बौद्ध धर्म द्वारा निर्धारित किया गया था जो हिंदू धर्म में बदल गया है" ।
Have you ever thought if , Buddhism neither believe in God nor in soul, than why they started making Buddha idols and started worshipping as God in Mahayana budhism ?
This is just opposite the truth, Gautam budha himself was a hindu.
@@mb-hb1fr No Hinduism before Mughals, Only Bramhanism exists, before this Mahayana Buddhism was Dharma of Majority.
रामचंद्र कह गए सिया से ऐसा कलयुग आएगा
हंस चुगेगा दाना-दुनका
हंस चुगेगा दाना-दुनका, कौआ मोती खाएगा
A series should go on. She has a great insight, her analysis is amazing .The show was interesting.
Gapodi hai ye Ruchita Sharma.
Aapne jin bhagwaan ki photo apni dp mein lagai h, dr ruchika unhe kalpanik maanti h.
Andhbhakt already getting influenced.
@@Razor_n_scalpel Many thanks. It is her understanding, how could it will affect me ? My belief is is not so fragile to be disturbed by others,my DP has also taught me to accept everything, because he is Jagannatha ,not Nath of any religion or region.
@@donttrustgodman I respect you and your views, every truth has been revealed from imagination only. One is dead,if he or she can't imagine.
33:07 सलादीन मेरे बहुत खास लगते है मेरे अब्बा के समान थे 😢
So according to her the Farsi writings about temple destruction is wrong but a random scripture about abhirs looting the temple is correct .
When Britishers talk about Islamic invasions then it is wrong but when they talk about Aryan invasion then it is right .
She also tried to support Romila Thapar and ironically most of her references for ancient India are British and German Indologists.
So British references are correct when it comes to ancient history but not when it comes to medieval times .
Saurabh’s counter question about Somnath and reference of jyotirling was spot on and she became uncomfortable and rejected that also.
So basically she’s a monkey historian who tries to monkey balance the history unnecessarily.
There is a term used by many Muslim kings as “BUTSHIKAN” which means destroyer of the idols . Islamic invaders used to put head of cows on idols and slaughter cows in temples to humiliate Hindus specially in north India that’s why cow slaughter is a sensitive issue in north.
If they just wanted to loot the temples then why to break the idols ? They could have just left with the gold .
Many historians also say that not much of the conversion happened in India but forgetting about total Muslims in Indian subcontinent and Hindus are 110 crores and Muslims are 60 crores so from where these 60 crores Muslims arrived?
Even Sambhaji was tortured and killed because he rejected to covert to Islam.
These white washing historians and liberals who try to put the dust under the carpet are one of the reasons of upsurging of the right wing in india .
Saurabh ji i believe you are a neutral and unbiased but in future if you want to give space to these kinds of historians then also bring historians like Minakshi Jain , Sampat , S saideepak , professor Ranganathan etc to counter them other wise it’s a certain narrative being forwarded by them and to counter them more and more people will make movies like kashmir files and it will only harm the left wing and Muslims of India .
Jalina 😂😂😂
Absolutely right. She is very much biased. It’s in fashion to create podcast with half or no knowledge because the masses are yet to discover the truth. Whole comment section is a PR. Lallantop is a left channel….They started as neutral but not anymore. Just check there report on Atik Ahmad.
Indeed. She's full of so much bias. It's not her fault. It's her foundation of JNU's famous faculties. Especially humanities
@@kolarprince6252tu g**du hai iska matlab yeh nhi hai ki duniya bhi g**du hai
She is WhatsApp University PhD
Waiting for guests like J Sai Deepak, Vikram Sampath, Dr. Meenakshi Jain and Dr. Anand Ranganathan. Hope Lallantop invites them and we get to hear their side of the story.
Copyin Harekrishna ji
They will be never called
Hard core liberal will not call rightwingers nationalists
If these guests are called then only the picture will be clear....
Vo rastrwadi h unko nhi bulayege ye
I will expose easily those liars.
मैडम ने अपने हिसाब से बहुत सारी व्याख्या कर दी लल्लन भाई खुश हो गए.
Science journey ne exposed Kiya hai isko proof ke sath dekhlo jake or share bhi Krna
Very Informative! Plz have one more session with Ruchika
शुक्रिया सौरभ भाई,, इतनी बेह्तरीन बैठक में बिठाने के लिए और रुचिका शर्मा से मुलाकात करवाने के लिए
Watch reality of Islam on Exmuslim channel on youtube.
Ex muslim sahil
Exmuslim sameer
Ex muslim deeni bhai
Adam seeker
Sachwala
Zoot ko lapet kar bech Rahi hai propoganda hai sab
मुल्तान से पश्चिम बंगाल तक और कश्मीर से कर्नाटक तक 🙏🚩
जिस की तूती बोलती थी हां गुर्जर प्रतिहार #मिहिरभोज ही वह नाम था 💪💪
जिसको सुन उस वक्त शत्रुओं की गद्दी डोलती थी🚩⛳🇮🇳
Fake Historian @Ruchika Sharma Open Debate Challenge From Science Journey
Saar debate science journey saar
😂😂😂😂@@PartiallyAnonymous456
😅 😊
. 😊.
😅
.
whole interview i listened and so interestingly facts analysed by her..
Konse fact
abe gappe mar rahi hai baith ke inko historians bolte ho tum log
Number of Ashokan inscriptions are 33 not seventy - eighty, out of 33 14 are rock edicts ( shilalekh) and 7 are pillar edicts...gazab ka itihas me anusandhan karya kiya hai ma'am aapne 🎉
Please bring Ruchika Mam Again on your Show 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 she has So many Things to share about the history of Bharat varsh(Afghanistan+Pakistan+India)
When Ashok writing his "lipi" as dhamm, why u calling it Brahmi ??
Ashok and samundgupt both used dhamm lipi it means both were Buddhist !
If gupt were brahmin, why they would tolerate praise of buddhist king written above.
Very very important and good information about history thanks Ruchika sharma ji our Anchor ji dhanyavad
😂😂
Supar hour ❤❤❤ really very interesting subject also she have a grt box of knowledge....plz saurabh sir call her again in ur show I will wait for her
True Historyen. No political and religious angle. Salute ❤ please come again..
no plz try to overlap left and right theories the overlap needs to be accepted.
@@udayraj6976 if the sources support it then definitely.. but if it is all tell tales then I will not accept the left or the right... like how the inscriptions of quwwatul islam mosque near qutub minar states that it was built by the destruction of 27 temples.. we will definitely accept that but if you say babri masjid was built by the destruction of a ram temple than you will have to provide sources of first that it existed, then it's destruction and then the construction... and as the judgement clearly states we don't know the answer to them.. and the evidence is all superimposed and not studied properly..
@@udayraj6976why should we overlap and why the overlap needs to be accepted? Jiska proof nahin hai usko kyun accept karein? Khayali pulav pakane ke liye ya false pride generate karne ke liye?
@@garimakilledar5810 again the same thing, if u really are truthmonger then you should not listen to anybody apart from archaeologists.
historians will have a bias.
problem is the ones you like are the true historians and the ones you dont are just spreading hate and its just propaganda.
i have seen people who dont even believe the archaeologists, just because it doesnt fit in their pov.
dont just go for one historian.
पोरपेगंडा इंटरव्यू
Saurabh sb Aadab
Iran koi bhi jaasakta hai aur paarsi mein "Dawa ko hi Daaru" kahte hain
Ms.Sjarma ki Lajawab prastuti ke liye bahut bahut Dhanyavad.
@@shafiulhaidary4567 bekar ek pada likha smjhdar hota to isne jo jo kuch interview me kha ek ek baat samjh jata ki iske pas koi refrence nhi hai shafiul tere baski nahi rende mat bol yar in sabme mat pad bhai madarsa jaao aapko waha sab bulare hai bhai........
👍
There are so many instances of contradiction in her testimony.
Why would she visit Iran to find out about Timur, which suffered a similar fate as India in the past with his attacks. Timur’s major monuments are in Uzbekistan and not in Iran.
She conveniently refuses to address the description of Somnath temple in Sanskrit sources where it appears with a different name “Prabhasa Patan”.
She assumes that Akbar didn’t know what was inscribed on the pillar because it was some British guy who later deciphered it. How can she jump to this conclusion? As the sources are silent, there is also a possibility that someone during Akbar’s reign translated Brahmi for him to understand the inscriptions on the pillar.
These and many other instances clearly show that enthusiasm to discover something in new generation scholars of History doesn’t translate into experience which actually generates expertise to understand history through various lenses. As a matter of fact most of the modern Indian historians specially from the JNU Gharana, consistently and conveniently are reluctant to dig deeper into folklore traditions which have remained a key for transfer of knowledge in successive generations. Such reluctance in a country which is known for its oral tradition of preservation of history, is deeply concerning.
When did you complete your PhD in history?
@@thebackyardpsychologistsame day when she did.
बहुत ही बढ़िया, अत्यंत ज्ञान वर्धक प्रस्तुति👍🏽
She knows a lot but her knowledge is limited to around Mandu. For everything else she depends on Romila Thapar's reference. This is the exact problem, we have with our historians. She doesn't want to believe what Ghajni wrote on Somnath but believes on Romila Thapar. She is not able to answer most of the questions on reference and says there is no answer to all questions. Excellent discussion to expose how history should not be believed as it is and need to hear all views.
बहुत ही दुःख के साथ कहना पड रहा हैं कि महिला जो ज्ञान दे रही है उसमे तथ्यों को बहुत ही ज्यादा छिपाया गया हैं वह सिर्फ उतनी ही बात बता रहीं है जो विमर्श ये स्थापित करना चाहती हैं. . सौरभ जी ने इन्हे क्यों बुलाया में ये नहीं समझ पा रहा.. आदरणीया को अपनी जानकारी बढ़ानी हो तो मेरे पास तथ्य है... सम्पर्क कर प्राप्त कर सकती हैं।
हा क्योंकि ये तो बोल रही है की सुमुनाथ की मूर्ति को तोड़ने गजनवी आया था 😂 इसको ये नही पता कि जब वो वापस जा रहा था तो उससे लड़ते लड़ते कितने राजपुत राजा शहिद हो गए सोमनाथ बचाने को
Iran jaane ke spne dekh dekhkr aur farsi pdh pdhkr baawli ho gyi hai bechari 😂
Brahman Agenda propoganda 😂😂😂😂
@@DKsou29 sahi kaha 👍
Dr.ruchica ji salamat rahen aameen khuda umr daraz kare, aapne bahut qimti baten bataien hain, pehli bar aapko suna,s.a.ali Jabalpur MP jay hind jay Bharat
Galat information mat failao, agar khudko knowledge nahi hai to gyan na chodo 🙏
Hope Indic scholars are also brought to this show .... Meenakshi jain ji , Vikram sampath ji , Sanjiv Sanyal ji ....
Nahi laega Bhai, Lallantop main aane ke lie fake history likhni padti hai!
To peddle fake propaganda
Kahan history kahan propagandist
@@ehteshamabedin1493 Hope the Marxist gate keepers had the audacity to rebuttal through critical academic work to the luminaries I have stated above ... Stop using ad hominem
@@ehteshamabedin1493 ha bas Chand ke tukde karna aur ayesha ka rape karna hi reality he
Very good discourse on History, very interesting as well.👏👏👏👏👏
xlnt discussion with clearcut evidences.stay blessed both of you dr Ruchika nd evergreen Sourabh.
Asok Bramhan hota to Sundar hota
Creating right understanding of history. A wonderful discussion. History is a subject and not a tool used for propaganda specially religious and political.
Thank you lallantop for this presentation. Great work keep it up.
Science journey
I am so proud that our professor Ruchika ma’am taught us medieval history in undergrad ❤
Your professor is a liar and Propagandist.
में बौद्ध धर्म अपनाऊंगा।
Tumhari. Marzi
Ha sahi hai