Rick Flanders: Why We Use the King James Version of the Bible (Lancaster Baptist Church)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 641

  • @stevensu8837
    @stevensu8837 11 років тому +29

    Whenever i read this King James Bible, God is speaking to me. Though i find it hard to understand at first, but by the power of His word it became sweet as honey. This book will be my life. Blessed be the Lord God Almighty.

    • @EternaLivesMatter
      @EternaLivesMatter 4 роки тому +1

      Steven I would like to ask you if you have been born again by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ who died was buried and rose again so that we could have eternal life John 3:16 through 18 tells us this if you have never trusted on the Lord Jesus alone for salvation from Hell please trust him now and ask him to save your soul from hell.
      Psalms 119:130
      The entrance of thy words giveth light; it giveth understanding unto the simple.

    • @howardmanley3388
      @howardmanley3388 3 роки тому +1

      EtErNaL LivEs MaTtEr! Whatever gave you the impression that this man needed to hear the savation message ? Why did think he wast saved a,ready?

    • @jwatson181
      @jwatson181 Рік тому +3

      God speaks to me with the KJV, ESV, NIV, and every faithful translation of his word.

    • @MUBANGASTEPHEN.LWAMBA-ke2pi
      @MUBANGASTEPHEN.LWAMBA-ke2pi 9 місяців тому

      Awesome.
      ...

    • @Sam-tk6us
      @Sam-tk6us 4 місяці тому

      ​@@joejacobs3537God doesn't what? Speak through the KJV? I know he does through the NIV, ESV, and all the faithful translations he has blessed us with.

  • @Obediah002
    @Obediah002 6 років тому +9

    Just ran across Rick Flanders here with this video, love his words his affinity for the truth of God's preserved word; he has lifted my spirit to hear him; thank you LORD!

  • @UniteAgainstEvil
    @UniteAgainstEvil 2 роки тому +4

    this brought tears to my eyes... amen, praise the Lord!

  • @tristansantosvlogs4877
    @tristansantosvlogs4877 6 років тому +8

    I just watched this because I didn't go to church but this is a very good sermion

  • @avoice2348
    @avoice2348 7 років тому +12

    Rich Flanders is honest, smart and he knows his Bible and history, and loves The Lord Jesus Christ.

  • @Ruby-gd9kb
    @Ruby-gd9kb 5 років тому +10

    Awesome message, Love his Booklet on The Book of John also, Bless you all~ John 3:3 KJV

  • @kennybarrett6111
    @kennybarrett6111 4 роки тому +4

    I’ve always loved the language of the KJV even before being born again, when I here the language of thus and nevertheless and begotten and heretofore and thou I think of a gentlemen and GOD is a gentlemen. Thank you LORD for my wonderful King James Version of your WORD.

  • @johnallen6688
    @johnallen6688 Рік тому +1

    Brother...you are the FIRST PREACHER I've given a chance to listen to aside from Dr Ruckman on this issue. THANK YOU!

  • @hubertmichael1595
    @hubertmichael1595 Місяць тому

    Very, well presented, and made indelible on our hearts.
    Thank you ❤

  • @jordandavis7
    @jordandavis7 11 років тому +1

    Great teaching, this video just solidified my faith in God's WOrd even more. I thank jesus for this teaching, may the Lord bless Mr. Rick Flanders abundantly

  • @danielthomas8932
    @danielthomas8932 10 років тому +58

    The problem is this:
    People believe that God inspired the Bible's writers, yet we don't take seriously His promise to preserve His word.
    Do we really think that God would have his Word not known and misunderstood, until - "phew, thank goodness for these modern day archeologists who dug up God's true Word, which was buried in the desert for centuries on end"....
    The Authorized King James Version is THE WORD OF GOD IN ENGLISH. The evidence strongly shows that. It is that simple.

    • @mel3760
      @mel3760 6 років тому +1

      Daniel Thomas amen!!!!

    • @NoahHolsclaw
      @NoahHolsclaw 6 років тому +4

      it is easy to say the kjv is all that god has spoken but the nasb and esv clearly show superior manuscript evidence and i will debate anyone who clames otherwise

    • @mel3760
      @mel3760 6 років тому +4

      Noah holsclaw nobody cares about your debate. YOU are not important. The bible (the real one) clearly says not to debate. That being said u won’t find that anywhere except a kjv 👉🏾👉🏾👉🏾👉🏾👉🏾

    • @NoahHolsclaw
      @NoahHolsclaw 6 років тому +1

      Mel sorry man paul did and so did Jesus and you only believe the kjv is the only bible because of false traditions i say this coming from a lobeing place in christ

    • @mel3760
      @mel3760 6 років тому +3

      Noah holsclaw they did not debate!!!!! They preached the gospel. Thank u! And anyway , again u don’t know why I read It alone. So whatever, by Gods grace I’m gonna continue to stick to my kjv. Bye bye

  • @kjvwarrior777
    @kjvwarrior777 4 роки тому +18

    The KJV is a timeless classic, good for all generations, after generations........

    • @jwatson181
      @jwatson181 2 роки тому +4

      Yes! It's the same Bible Moses used!

    • @lefebre27
      @lefebre27 2 роки тому +2

      @@jwatson181 😂

    • @Proverbspsalms
      @Proverbspsalms Рік тому +1

      @@jwatson181 he did

    • @jwatson181
      @jwatson181 Рік тому

      @@Proverbspsalms Moses used 1611 Victorian English? The more you know.

    • @Proverbspsalms
      @Proverbspsalms Рік тому

      @@jwatson181 yes he did

  • @jimmiewalker2781
    @jimmiewalker2781 8 років тому +24

    john X, you are not alone. There are others who believe with you that the kjv is the perfect word of GOD. Stay faithful to GOD and HE will be faithful to you. all we can do is pray for the unbelievers who doubted the true words of GOD(KJV).

    • @Sam-tk6us
      @Sam-tk6us 5 місяців тому +1

      So those who reject the KJV only deception are unbelievers? The gospel is about Christ and him crucified not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation of scripture called the KJV.

  • @hopeseeker97
    @hopeseeker97 6 років тому +8

    They even changed the KJV now. Need to make sure it is the AKJV (authorized KJV).

    • @armin__363
      @armin__363 3 місяці тому

      is there really only ONE Version of the authorized KJV? (No hate to you, I am just searching for the perfect Bible)

  • @ToOpen6seven
    @ToOpen6seven 6 років тому +6

    I am very thankful to God that my love for the KJV (from the 80's when many Christians were trying to get me to change to NIV or something) came from the study of His Holy Word and not any preacher, teacher or minister. I knew back then that the other versions were not good, I tried to read them, with no prejudice, and I just couldn't - always went back to the KJV. I settled on getting a Bible with 4 translations (KJV, Amplified, New American Standard and NIV) - LOL, still ended up reading ONLY the KJV part or if I went to the other versions, I had my trusted KJV nearby. Now all of these videos are coming out about the authenticity of the KJV - I knew it was authentic before there was even a UA-cam channel. Just sit and read, study, learn, live the Word of God, all of this debate does one thing and that is to bring division and to keep us from falling in love with Him through His word. PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THIS!! God speaks to us (humans) through His Holy Word, for the most part. Even if we receive a vision or a dream it MUST line up with God's Holy Word - so wouldn't it be to the Devil benefit to corrupt His Holy Book. I even read an excerpt (MYSELF) from an article from that follower of Satan Manly P Hall where he said verbatim about publishing a new version of the Bible because all the Christians wanted was the good ole KJV every jot and tittle of it!! Here is the link-- see page 8 on the PDF (manlyhall.org/horizon/horizon-0401-spring-1944.pdf). Why would a known mason and Satan worshiper be concern about bringing in new Bible versions, huh????

    • @hubertmichael1595
      @hubertmichael1595 Місяць тому

      Yes my friend; (this) the King James Bible is SELF- Authenticating.

  • @normanewton3495
    @normanewton3495 11 років тому +8

    Good message keep up the stand on the KJV. It is the Word of God!

  • @markrogers7546
    @markrogers7546 7 років тому +8

    A giant leap of logic from the Israelites having an accurate copy of the Torah and perceiving the KJV as the only accurate translation.

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      Yes. But all the Torahs in ALL of the synagogues are the SAME. The same cannot be said about the KJV. See Matt. 28:20, 1 Peter 5:3, Rev. 14:1, and other verses.

    • @tylerj3088
      @tylerj3088 Рік тому

      @@---zc4qt KJV 1611 authorized version..
      Seems you are not open to truly searching..
      Some how you think we should go to the Jews who rejected Jesus Christ even though it was written for them to know.. we should trust them? They definitely have different versions..
      You should do your own research if you are so puffed up.

  • @edmcgugan2079
    @edmcgugan2079 2 роки тому +1

    Wonderful! Thank you!

  • @mikemaid5350
    @mikemaid5350 2 роки тому +2

    The KJV is the Bible of the American Revolution published by Robert Aiken for the first continental congress. The Constitution is the Law of the Land or our Law of Moses.

  • @gregsettle5880
    @gregsettle5880 11 років тому +1

    God is God. If God can speak the Milky Way into existence, then it is a very small thing indeed, for him to preserve His word to all generations, as He has promised!

  • @silvereagle4131
    @silvereagle4131 4 роки тому +2

    THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME TO SHOW GODS TRUTH

  • @neiljohn1305
    @neiljohn1305 3 роки тому +1

    Revelation 22:20
    He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

  • @Pastor4all52
    @Pastor4all52 6 років тому +2

    I appreciate what Rick Flanders has to say. While I consult many translations of the Bible I find that I keep going back to the King James Version. Modern translations are so "low-voltage" compared to the KJV. While this is a "subjective" statement to me the KJV just "rings" with authority. I do not put people down who use modern translations. The fact is, so many today simply cannot understand the vocabulary of the KJV (sadly, and to their own impoverishment). I'm glad that so many years ago my Grandfather introduced me to the KJV. He planted seeds that would prove to be deeply implanted within my heart. Folks, lets not squabble or attack people who use modern translations of the Bible. Let's simply show the love if Jesus to them. THAT will speak louder than any words we could possibly say (or any arguments we could put forth). Grace and peace be to all God's children.

    • @destaylor7841
      @destaylor7841 5 років тому

      Bible that doesnt say Thee, or Thou is not low voltage its just using language that we use today

    • @Brother_Timothy_Harvey
      @Brother_Timothy_Harvey Рік тому +1

      @@destaylor7841 it's not just thee and thou its the sentence structure, the choice words, the easy memorization of passages and so much more that makes the KJV high voltage

  • @johnnyvans_77
    @johnnyvans_77 5 місяців тому +1

    i believe that God use now the english language to spread his word to other countries and kjv is the pure word of God in english language 🔥✝️

  • @superhoga
    @superhoga 11 років тому +4

    If you think so highly of what God says to you when you read your favorite version, why do you think so little of what He says to me when I read mine?

  • @Jer20.9
    @Jer20.9 8 років тому +21

    Paul says clearly there will be a falling away in the last days. I feel the main requirement for the future unfaithful church will be an unfaithful Bible.

    • @samspade7500
      @samspade7500 6 років тому +2

      An unfaithful bible? Like the KJV?

    • @djayfriMusic
      @djayfriMusic 5 років тому +1

      @@samspade7500 you are unfaithful by saying such nonsense.

    • @SamOwenI
      @SamOwenI 5 років тому +1

      @@djayfriMusic but you're assuming the KJV is the standard when it's an English translation with a history. There are many countries in the world where English is not spoken/read, and many more translations that existed before the KJV and have been written after the KJV.

    • @djayfriMusic
      @djayfriMusic 5 років тому +2

      @@SamOwenI I'm Dutch. I have a Dutch Statenvertaling next to my King James. Which is the word of God in Dutch. Same manuscripts, same method of litteral translating, not interpreting. Next to the manuscripts the translators used the KJV. The KJV is translated in 800 + language's.
      The King James AV1611 is the standard. It's the bible God choose, that he authorised. All to his glory.
      And you are wise to pick one up and start reading and believing. You will be amazed at how God will reveal himself through his word.
      God bless.

    • @SamOwenI
      @SamOwenI 5 років тому

      @@djayfriMusic you don't know what you're saying. Fallible men did scholarship to give us the KJV. Indeed God has used the KJV - it's a brilliant translation. He also used the Vulgate and the Septuagint and the Geneva Bible and all sorts of other works.
      And goodness, we should not be translating the KJV to other languages - it's not the standard that God inspired. The original languages are what we should be forming new translations from.
      But indeed, praise God for what he has done through the work of the KJV translators. Those men did not believe what you believe about the KJV.

  • @TheArtisticGardener777
    @TheArtisticGardener777 4 роки тому +6

    “And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.”
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭KJV‬‬
    Why would you ever take out “but by every word of God.”? “And Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone.’””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭ESV‬‬
    “And Jesus answered him, “It is written: ‘M AN SHALL NOT LIVE ON BREAD ALONE.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
    “But Jesus told him, “No! The Scriptures say, ‘People do not live by bread alone.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NLT‬‬
    “Jesus replied to him, “It is written and forever remains written, ‘M AN SHALL NOT LIVE BY BREAD ALONE.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭AMP‬‬
    “And Jesus answered unto him, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone.”
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭ASV‬‬
    “Jesus replied, “ It’s written, People won’t live only by bread.””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭CEB‬‬
    “Jesus answered, “The Scriptures say, ‘No one can live only on food.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭CEV‬‬
    “But Jesus answered him, “It is written: Man must not live on bread alone. ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭CSB‬‬
    “But Jesus answered, “The scripture says, ‘Human beings cannot live on bread alone.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭GNB‬‬
    “But Jesus answered him, “It is written: Man must not live on bread alone.””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭HCSB‬‬
    “Jesus answered by quoting Deuteronomy: “It takes more than bread to really live.””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭MSG‬‬
    “Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘One does not live by bread alone.’””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NABRE‬‬
    “Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘ Man does not live by bread alone.’””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NET‬‬
    “Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NIV‬‬
    “Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘One does not live by bread alone.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭NRSV‬‬
    “And Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone.’ ””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭RSV‬‬
    “Yeshua answered him, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone.’””
    ‭‭Luke‬ ‭4:4‬ ‭TLV‬‬
    All of these “modern” versions have taken out the very word of God. They are all corrupted. The enemy has enticed men to change God’s Word for greedy gain and vanity. America has done this. The corruption and confusion prolific in this nation and the world today are a consequence of the opening this wicked door. Judgement is coming, and it will begin at the house of God. America has become Babylon, the harlot of Revelation. She sits on a scarlet colored beast that will burn her with fire. The Lord is about to rip open the foundations of the deep, and with the earth, destroy the earth. The only “ark” in which we can be saved is Jesus Christ Himself.

    • @Sam-tk6us
      @Sam-tk6us 4 місяці тому

      Not taken out of more accurate modern translations. But added in the corrupted KJV. But it is in Matthew, because Matthew wrote it.

  • @edeneverson2226
    @edeneverson2226 7 років тому +11

    Excellent teaching and sermon, I use the KJV and in addition to prayer it has blessed my life greatly, Jesus healed me of the botulism poisoning I was bedridden with...now I am walking dogs and baking again! Glory to GOD and his infallible Word! Judge wisdom by its fruit...the KJV will never lead you astray

  • @bokings9448
    @bokings9448 7 років тому +2

    I love this great job hope to see more

  • @aralious44
    @aralious44 9 років тому +1

    Amen! Great sermon! God bless Lancaster Church!

  • @CrownCollegeTN
    @CrownCollegeTN 12 років тому +1

    Amen!!!! Glory to God!!!!! Thank you for posting!!!! I am a member of Temple Baptist Church in Powell, Tennessee under the leadership of Pastor Clarence Sexton. May God bless your ministry.

    • @robbieallen3568
      @robbieallen3568 3 роки тому

      I'm from Knoxville and living in Washington state (family reasons). I haven't found one church here at uses the KJV. To be sitting in a Bible study with 30 different people who have 30 different Bible versions is very frustrating!! I wanna come home back to my KJV roots!! Blessings to you!

  • @bibleprotector
    @bibleprotector 10 років тому +1

    This is an enjoyable sermon to watch.

  • @jerrylisby5376
    @jerrylisby5376 4 роки тому +2

    A lot of people USE the King James Bible. But they don't believe it is perfect without error. Yet the walking WORD is perfect. Would his written word be less perfect? Psalm138:2 says he magnified his word ABOVE his name. His name is above every name and yet God magnified his word above it! One way he has magnified his word is by printing more copies of the KJV than any other book in history. It is the greatest seller of all time. There are almost as many King James Bibles sold as McDonalds hamburgers!!!

  • @1977annand
    @1977annand 11 років тому +2

    praise God for his preservation.i love the kjv1611

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So you spell Jesus as "I-e-f-v-f"?

    • @swamprat22
      @swamprat22 10 місяців тому

      @@---zc4qtin the 1611 kjv it was Iesus, despite the spelling conventions they had at the time

  • @ChrisLilly-e9b
    @ChrisLilly-e9b Рік тому

    Excellent - right on the nail.

  • @Ruby-gd9kb
    @Ruby-gd9kb 5 років тому +2

    Amen Evangelist Rick Flander, The King James Version Holy Bible is ACCURATE!!!

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      SOME-TIMES accurate, but NOT PERFECT.

    • @Isaiasruizzz
      @Isaiasruizzz 4 роки тому +1

      -- it’s perfect if you can show me one mistake I can’t answer then I will agree

  • @chriskelly1890
    @chriskelly1890 Рік тому +1

    The KJV, which was revised in the late 1800s, is beautifully written (by a committee), but it's not the most accurate translation. It's just one of hundreds of translations in hundreds of languages.

  • @SibleySteve
    @SibleySteve 2 роки тому +2

    This man is one of the nicest preachers I've ever met. For 6 years I heard him weekly in chapel when I attended his school in Michigan. I went with him on college trips and talked with him and although I did not attend his church, he was kind. I didn't always agree with his conclusions, particularly like this one about the KJV, which I greatly admire as a classic, I think Rick Flanders is a good man. I also greatly respect Tyndale, and his contribution to the AV (KJV). However, the Jack Hyles heresy that the 1611 version is somehow more inspired than much earlier Greek copies is false gospel. It is important to call out heresy where we see it, and the idolatry of putting an English translation, which I love, on the very same level as the earliest Greek copies is just wrong. We can love the KJV, but it is not right to say it is the only version. Some of it is opaque. I have studied it all my life, along with Shakespeare, and I still have trouble understanding several passages that are so archaic. I learned Greek and I do not claim to be a scholar, but I've read the Bible in KJV and Greek and honestly the KJV is harder to understand in some places than the Greek is! But I do love and respect this man, and he is honest.

  • @gregsettle5880
    @gregsettle5880 11 років тому +2

    Yes, the KJV is the word of God, the problem is, most folks, me included, have a difficult time understanding that venerable old translation. Language has changed dramatically in the last 400+ years.

  • @Christopher-h4z
    @Christopher-h4z 7 років тому

    Paulus, in one of his epistles cites Proverbia (Proverbs) according to Septuaginta (LXX) in which a verse is not contained in our masoretic texts which we have today. But it is in the Septuagint, because it had in its background other handwritings (masoretic texts) not available today.

  • @MichaelJohnson-fg7oz
    @MichaelJohnson-fg7oz 10 років тому +10

    In all my studies i find ALL translated bibles, be it from minority or majority text to give the same message. Jesus is still God, the Word, Creator, dies on the cross and rises, raised into glory and sends Paul and his disciples to preach to the world! The Holy Ghost is still God .......! All give same message.

    • @REEFBLUENOTCH
      @REEFBLUENOTCH 10 років тому +7

      Quite wrong grasshopper, for if indeed you have really "STUDIED" (and ALL versions I might add), you would find that some DENY the virgin birth and Deity of Christ.
      You're regurgitating only that which you've heard elsewhere my friend.

    • @TheDoctor394
      @TheDoctor394 10 років тому +1

      That's quite right, except with such versions as the Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation. But all mainstream Bible translations do teach the essential Christian message.

    • @hashidqadhi5033
      @hashidqadhi5033 10 років тому +1

      but the different versions give different meaning especially when i share the gospel to muslims, they often start to debate me.because of different versions

    • @TheDoctor394
      @TheDoctor394 10 років тому

      nestor ramirez There are different wordings and different structures in the translations and, every now and again, you will find differences in certain meanings of things, but none when it comes to essential foundations of the Christian faith. These are all clear in all mainstream translations of the Bible.

    • @hashidqadhi5033
      @hashidqadhi5033 10 років тому

      the most important is the concept sir, it the end it will lead to one concept.... Jesus Christ died on the cross to redeem the world.... ^_^

  • @thatguyitsme7707
    @thatguyitsme7707 Рік тому

    1 Samuel 8:10-18
    Does the Crown King/Queen defend your faith or the Pope’s?

  • @mattleemattlee123
    @mattleemattlee123 11 років тому +4

    Darren, hang tough brother. Notice how the "KJB Are Wrong"ists always attempt to wither your spirit? They stick to the talking points: "Well, the GREEK says..." or "Flawed translation" or, when all else fails, personal insults towards the believer. There is one authorized, correct translation in English, period. God's hand guided the translators as sure as it did Moses' or Isaiah's. The text is true, correct and trustworthy. Amen!

    • @jonathanyeong324
      @jonathanyeong324 2 роки тому

      Wow so you sre saying Jesus and the Apostles spoke Elizabethen English?
      I dont think so - im pretty sure they spoke archaic hebrew or araimic.
      Since when was English even existent in the time of biblical israel??!

  • @jerrytesta1708
    @jerrytesta1708 3 роки тому +1

    The question you raised concerning various Bible versions is a very complex issue that cannot be adequately discussed in a letter. Often times it is filled with more emotion and heat than it is knowledge and light. Let me share with you my own conclusions after studying these issues. Bible versions, such as the New International Version and the New American Standard Bible, have been translated by godly men of demonstrated academic repute from the very best manuscript evidence that is available today. May I add, the manuscript evidence that is now available is far superior to that which was available to the King James Version's translators in 1611.

    • @jwatson181
      @jwatson181 2 роки тому

      It's not even complicated. You are correct.

  • @superhoga
    @superhoga 11 років тому +1

    So why did that preservation end in 1611? Nobody can make an accurate translation anymore? Why was it right for those translators to update Tyndale? Does Dr Flanders not engage in textual criticism when he tells us some manuscripts are better than others? Final question: does Dr Flanders actually believe these are convincing arguments that lead inescapably to accepting his favorite version as the only faithful version?

  • @Beautifulmusiclistnr
    @Beautifulmusiclistnr Рік тому

    I haven't listened to this sermon yet, but this is one of the reasons why I don't go to church anymore. Nobody uses the King James Version, and the Church is watered down enough as it is without using it, but since most churches want to use another "version", I don't go. Also, today's songs are so "weird". They lack the Word of God in them.

  • @trainingvideos364
    @trainingvideos364 5 років тому +1

    Amen.Brother Flanders!!!

  • @thomasdoulos6997
    @thomasdoulos6997 11 років тому +1

    The fact is that there are readings in the Greek text that is behind the KJV for which there are no manuscripts; however, the further fact is that most passages included in the KJV that are excluded from modern translations have many manuscripts to support them. Older does not mean better. When older is VERY few and newer is very many but from multiple regions, it is VERY difficult to prove collusion of corruption. Modern critical text favoring scholars want us to think that the solution is simple - use the older manuscripts, but nothing could be further from the truth. It is a massively complex topic and many that have studied if for years come upon the conclusion that the majority text is more accurate than the minority text (funny, you rarely hear NA or UBS fans use that accurate terminology [smile]). If you have not spent years studying this issue for many hours each year, you should never dogmatically assert something you've heard a scholar say. Make your own decision, sure, but don't put your faith in men and then act like you've done the research yourself. I've been studying this issue for at least 50-60 hours per year for the past 15+ years and I am still not completely convinced of either viewpoint. And there are scholars who have studies it for thousands of hours and come down on both sides, so it is OBVIOUSLY not a simple, decided, clear-cut issue.

  • @willishall5897
    @willishall5897 7 років тому +1

    your teaching is very very needed on the KJV.

  • @Jeremy-w6z
    @Jeremy-w6z 10 місяців тому

    Hello Paul Chappell!!! I hope that this communication finds you well... With all due respect and reverence, of which you, as another unique and individual human being, do indeed deserve, I would like to ask you a question, a question that I hope you will give all due and prayerful consideration... Why would the founders of protestant sects, who only rely on the KJV of the Bible, rely on the KJV of the Bible??? The founders of the protestant sects relying only on the KJV of the Bible are the same people who, having felt that they, indeed, were being so ruthlessly oppressed by the British, to the extreme point that they were willing to engage in all-out-war with the british to regain and establish their freedom and deserved liberty... Why then, would they, the oppressed, having fought hard to regain their independence , venerate and make holy and absolutely sacred the KJV of the Bible, the same version that King James himself commissioned a group of several individuals to create? The KJV of the Bible is the product of only a small amount of information from a small amount of the many many many scrolls available... Why would the oppressed make sacred the version of the Bible given to them by the British, the one's they felt were oppressing them, as the only valid and accurate source of knowledge and information, from which to live and seek spiritual comfort and salvation... I understand that you, like every other human being, are only seeking answers to this beautiful mystery we are living in... The mystery of life... I appeal to your intelligence, with the exclusion of your education...due to the fact that education and intelligence are not at all anything synonymous with one another... An educated person may be completely void of any valuable knowledge and experience that would really amount to what the Greeks referred to as Sophia (wisdom) she is lovely, indeed, even as Solomon describes her to be... An uneducated person may, Also be full of knowledge and actual experience that would truly amount to Sophia (Wisdom❤) I do hope that, upon this comment coming into your awareness, you have up to that point had an enjoyable experience of Love, Compassion, and Kindness, while going about your day... If you would care to further engage in discussion on this topic, I feel completely willing to do so with you....

  • @pilosopotasiojr.1815
    @pilosopotasiojr.1815 6 років тому

    Good speaker. I wonder what he says, he practices is, such as OBEDIENCE TO THE SABBATH COMMANDMENTS and the 7 Biblical Feast of the Bible, such as the Passover, Shavuot, Yom Teruach, Sukkot, etc, and the observance of the Kosher foods.

    • @Brother_Timothy_Harvey
      @Brother_Timothy_Harvey Рік тому +3

      Christ fulfilled that. Simple and plain. It's been 4 years since you wrote this - I hope your views have changed

  • @robertdutill2
    @robertdutill2 6 років тому

    I am not convinced in the KJV only teaching, but it is a valid teaching, isn't it just for English Speaking people only? Since English speakers are a small minority of Christ Following brothers and sister, are there translations to be used by the Majority of the church? If you know, please respond. I would like to know.

  • @lamja00
    @lamja00 10 років тому +2

    I didn't watch the video because I don't have time, but did God say that the KJV is the exclusive Bible that should be followed? Moreover, I was reading that the KJV provides an incorrect rendering for the word Cananaean in Matthew 10:4 and Mark 3:18, so how can it be perfect? That word should be Zealot according to Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary pg. 245, ISBN-13: 978-0310229834. I welcome anyone''s feedack.

    • @MadlyinLovewithJesus-1953
      @MadlyinLovewithJesus-1953 10 років тому

      *****
      P.S. Spiritualists are those who strive to communicate with the dead (which is forbidden in the Bible).

    • @jayhillz3705
      @jayhillz3705 9 років тому +1

      You get your info from Zondervan? Lol, so corrupt

    • @lamja00
      @lamja00 9 років тому

      Yeah I do, what's wrong with that?

    • @jayhillz3705
      @jayhillz3705 9 років тому +1

      do some research

    • @lamja00
      @lamja00 9 років тому

      what did they do wrong?

  • @bickabraham2397
    @bickabraham2397 5 місяців тому

    Because it's the Pure Milk of the Word.
    And Hebrews 10:7 clearly states it's the volume of the book written of Christ to do thy Will O God!

  • @sherryhall5245
    @sherryhall5245 7 років тому +4

    Rick: Great and true teaching. You have a powerful voice and testimony; KJV, yes GOD BREATHED, HOLY PERFECTION- from the heart of our living GOD... W. Hall.

  • @thomasdoulos6997
    @thomasdoulos6997 11 років тому

    BTW - To be clear, my comments on this video are not a defense of KJV onlyism - anyone who studies the Greek text knows that the KJV is a great translation (one of the best), but there are errors in the translation as well. Not trying to start an argument with KJV only folks here, just making sure my position is not misconstrued. I believe we must investigate and defend on a case-by-case basis the accuracy of the text and, in my experience, more often than not, the majority text has been upheld against the critical text - though I would not call myself a majority text-only person either ;-)

    • @shultman37
      @shultman37 10 років тому

      True enough. The MT typically comes very close to the Critical Texts, while the TR generally follows the Vulgate.

    • @DrBob1611
      @DrBob1611 10 років тому

      shultman37 What? People on this page, would you please study before you repeat what you've heard?! Some of your statements are either so far off the wall or they come close to the truth but than you give your assumptions and you sound ignorant of the real facts. Come on, the MT close to the Critical text and the TR follows the Latin Vulgate? Who are you listening to or reading after or are these your misunderstood opinions of either misinformation or half truth and half forgotten statements? Do you read Hebrew and Greek? And have you personally examined the evidence? Wow, what wild misplaced opinions and prejudices.

    • @shultman37
      @shultman37 10 років тому

      LOL sir you absolutely have done no study on the TR if you believe that it was not heavily influenced by the Latin Vulgate. The CT, that while yes do not follow the MSS as closely (although doctrine is still contained in both text types), due to the fact that the MSS is largely later date text. However, if you look at the evidence of the earliest manuscripts (papri), you will note that they DO in fact follow the CT and not the TR. You can get such info from:
      The Bible in English: its history and influence. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. Daniell, David (2003).
      or:
      The Authorized Edition of the English Bible, 1611, its subsequent reprints and modern representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1884).
      Apparently you are one of the KJO folks who reads exclusively from TR manuscripts as they help to supplant all your findings that they are closer to the TR. However, like many others (including james white of whom is much more a scholar then myself) we examine all the different chains of evidence and manuscripts. Hence the rejection of 1 John 5:7-8. But that's a different discussion.

  • @jonnyy4088
    @jonnyy4088 11 років тому

    When the preacher mentioned psalm 23,for some reason I heard psalm 26.Not a happy read for me.Somebody is telling me something.

  • @shelleyallen4090
    @shelleyallen4090 6 років тому +19

    KJV is the one and only bible love reading it.

    • @dennishagans6339
      @dennishagans6339 6 років тому +1

      so many do not share our love for the old paths.
      Jer 6:16 Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
      The Fruit of the KJV is for all to see, in 400 years many millions have been saved from the preaching of the Cross from the KJV.
      The KJV can lay claim to at least three great revivals or great awakenings.
      the KJV has good fruit to its credit.
      I wonder what the fruit the modern versions have, for all of there so-called easier to read mantra, we have seen, playboy, penthouse, r- rated movies xxx rated movies, abortion, the removal of prayer from our schools, the 60's counterculture with soft rock, then rock, hard rock, metal, heavy metal, acid, and punk rock, the gays came out of the closet, America has become a cesspool of filth and crime has exploded over the years.
      there are now hundreds of English versions of the bible but where is the fruit of all of these modern easier to read bibles? the fruit is rotten to the core and even the core is rotten.
      when they kicked the KJV to the curb and produced all of these modern versions the difference in the fruit between the KJV and the modern version is as different as the two paths of text underlying them, the KJV comes from the God preserved text know as the TR and the modern versions come from Alexandrian texts from the Gnostics of Egypt.

    • @dennishagans6339
      @dennishagans6339 6 років тому

      @Jeremiah Tassinari
      you are preaching to the choir but why? I am Saved, a dedicated follower of Jesus Christ. I walk by faith and I believe that the text the KJV is based on is the God preserved text.

    • @dennishagans6339
      @dennishagans6339 6 років тому

      @Jeremiah Tassinari
      well if the Base text is the preserved Word of God and they did as word for word translation as best as they could because a few words were not exactly word for word, but yes the KJV is the Word of God in English.

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      Have you ever read the 1611 KJV translators' "Translators to the Readers"? Are you okay having a ROMAN CATHOLIC make an edition of the Greek New Testament?

    • @boldasalion6436
      @boldasalion6436 Рік тому

      @@dennishagans6339 ~ 🎯 nailed it.

  • @Michael_Chandler_Keaton
    @Michael_Chandler_Keaton 8 років тому +34

    King James Bible is the absolute perfect word in the english language. Period. Every other (per)version falls short and some are blatant heresy.

    • @bobleeswagger7972
      @bobleeswagger7972 8 років тому +1

      amen

    • @bobleeswagger7972
      @bobleeswagger7972 8 років тому +2

      think it shows your utter stupidity, Keaton's statement is right

    • @Michael_Chandler_Keaton
      @Michael_Chandler_Keaton 8 років тому +1

      No the only ignorancr is pretending that printing ten new "bible" versions a year, and basing them all on the texts that have the least support, and indeed were first written in the mecca of heresy.

    • @roddumlauf9241
      @roddumlauf9241 8 років тому +3

      Chandler,
      Its easy to prove that the KJV is not the perfect word in English if you put it to the test and actually read it.
      If you're so sure of your position, would you be open to answering some questions for me ?

    • @Michael_Chandler_Keaton
      @Michael_Chandler_Keaton 8 років тому

      Rodd Umlauf Sure as long as you will answer a few for me in kind. Allow me to clarify my position first as I have modified it slightly. I acknowledge some translation errors in the KJV but it is still by far the best English translation and the only widely available English version based off the best most well supported manuscript tradition.

  • @ok5731
    @ok5731 5 років тому +2

    I left a small Baptist church. The Pastor said the NASB cut his sermons by 10 min. He came to my house , talked to me in my garden. Told me that I take away from the word of God by not going to church LoL. Then he said that God did not leave a perfect written word , and again said " he just didn't do it". About a week later it struck me that this encounter took place in a garden.

  • @november8289
    @november8289 7 років тому +8

    Amen! KJB is God's word preserved perfectly in English!

    • @samlawrence2695
      @samlawrence2695 Рік тому

      How is the KJV God's perfectly preserved in English? When it is nothing more than a translation. Where is the scripture that supports the man made tradition of KJV onlyism. Nothing more than presumptuous arrogance.

  • @dbcustomrc
    @dbcustomrc 3 роки тому

    I like the KJV. I read the KJV and prefer it as my primary version. However, the point he makes at time stamp 43:22 is folly. The speaker makes the point that those who actually spoke or wrote the inspired word of God, or those who were reading original texts from those words would not pause to state that they do not know what a certain word meant or that they would reference other biblical texts to explain words or phrases. Of course they would not do that because the languages used in those texts were not dead or entirely lost as they are today. Any Biblical scholar worth his salt who has ever studied biblical texts knows that there are words we have to be careful with because we do not fully know their meaning, or that there are multiple meanings for them. The word love for instance. We do not see many translations, including the KJV, that accurately relay the meaning of the word love. It is only by going back and translating ancient texts that we realize how many versions of love there are and that they have each have a different meaning. This is a classic misrepresentation of KJ onlyism. Again, I don’t speak against the KJV, but there is more to what this man says than he leads you to believe.

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    Read Matthew 18 line 11 in the NIV.
    I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name. Psalms 138:2
    Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. Psalms 12:7
    For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 1 Corinthians 14:33
    Matthew 4:4

  • @pileonjustice
    @pileonjustice 7 років тому +1

    If you read 1 Samuel 28 in the NIV and many other modern versions, you would think God is willing to make exceptions and actually use witchcraft.

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    God's word cannot be changed, altered, or translated & still be the words that he pronounced with his lips when he declared all the thoughts of his heart from the beginning & promised to preserve every jot & tittle for all generations. The word of God must be the 1st & only pure language made of pure words.
    Isa 46:9,10; Gen 11:1; Psalm 33:11; 89:34; 12:6,7; Zeph 3:9;Prov 22:20,21; Isa34:16,17; Matt 5:18; Acts 26:14; Hosea 8:12;Matt 4:4.
    Only one book can satisfy these precepts. Which book is it?

  • @jerrytesta1708
    @jerrytesta1708 3 роки тому

    From my experience from attending various Baptist churches, who are committed to the scriptures, are steeped in legalism. Cause more confusion and committed more to traditions rather honestly addressing the real issues.

  • @22microns
    @22microns 11 років тому +2

    What was the "final authority", the "preserved word of God" in 1610 and prior?
    Why does the KJV differ from it, and who or how does the KJV get its' authority to say that it is the final version?

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      -Why do KJV Bibles differ from each other?
      -WHY are Baptists in REBELLION from the church that GAVE them the KJV?

  • @ACOJV214TX
    @ACOJV214TX 10 років тому

    Thank God for this message. I read the RVR 1960, and currently looking for an English translation of the Word of God. I was debating between KJV or ESV. But I'm more confident with my choice. It is a pain going to a Bible store and have to ask yourself, What's the most accurate version?

  • @sherryhall5245
    @sherryhall5245 7 років тому +6

    KJV. The WORD OF GOD THE WORDS OF GOD.

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    What then is the first language in which the word of God is written?
    Give me the name of the book, chapter and line to prove the answer. And for that matter, give me the name of the language in which all scripture is written according to the scriptures.

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      John Wycliffe translated from the Latin Vulgate in to English. Was he of God or of the Devil?

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    If any man think himself to be a
    prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge
    that the things that I write unto you are the
    commandments of the Lord.
    1 Corinthians 14:37
    These are the pure words of the pure language which the Lord declared from the beginning, pronounced with his lips, wrote and preserved for all generations. To assay to prove otherwise can only be by the lying traditions and chronicles of man.
    There can be only one book of the LORD and if it is not my book, then find it.

  • @newexodus20
    @newexodus20 5 років тому

    While I use the KJV. side by side with the Complete Jewish Bible, KJV, I believed made an error in translating John 1:17. It added the word "but" which in in italic, contrasting the Law of Moses and grace and truth of our Lord Jesus Christ. This is a BIG theological question. Italic words inserted in the bible translation are not found in the original Greek. But I have a very high regards to the KJV. Shabbat Shalom. (April 27, 2019).

  • @davidalley7270
    @davidalley7270 7 років тому

    The original 1611 KJV contained Masonic handshakes and Roman gods (illustrations)and the apocrypha! Which revision are you referring to? There are contradictions and mistakes also. God repented? God tempted? God created evil? The holy spirit is called a ghost?

  • @hopoffmyrazor
    @hopoffmyrazor 11 років тому

    Obviously, do you not see what the title of the video is?

  • @johnnyvans_77
    @johnnyvans_77 5 місяців тому +1

    kjv is the pure word of God🔥✝️, niv,nlt,esv,nkjv is corrupt bible only kjv is pure🔥✝️

  • @bokings9448
    @bokings9448 7 років тому

    WOW very good

  • @alexander944
    @alexander944 5 років тому +2

    Oh the changing KJV.... Most recently updated in 1979. Kinda “new” if you ask me when you compare it to the OT scrolls

  • @Justaguywithtruth
    @Justaguywithtruth 7 років тому +1

    Truth told, God doesn't Change, pride of Man wants to be God, fix His Word because they pathetically think they know better..

  • @jeffpreston2000
    @jeffpreston2000 12 років тому +1

    Mr. Flanders is correct in his opening remarks when he says "this will not be intellectual and scholarly" He was right. In fact I find him shallow, unconvincing, and more focused on proving other Christians mistaken, rather than sharing the Good News.

    • @destaylor7841
      @destaylor7841 5 років тому

      Amen yet again brother, wake up people to this stuff

  • @jydymyyyr9630
    @jydymyyyr9630 5 місяців тому

    His comments at 44:56 speak volumes on the critics of the KJV bible... unbelievers looking for an excuse to discredit God's word!

    • @DavidBrown-tf7uv
      @DavidBrown-tf7uv 2 місяці тому

      No…opponents of KJV onlyism look for arguments to discredit this utterly indefensible belief.

  • @shultman37
    @shultman37 10 років тому

    And this guy is wrong. He has not done his research on the Scrolls found at Qumran. Most of them had differences, but they were small and not major. Only a few verses were actually different. Like in Deut. there were a few changes in there that made it clear that the masoritic scrolls were slighly changed over time.

    • @ChurchLifestyle
      @ChurchLifestyle 10 років тому

      You are an uneducated apostate teaching the Bible without authority. God Wins.

  • @gogetit9005
    @gogetit9005 6 років тому +3

    Jack Chick, one man started a biiiiiig problem. Wow

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому +1

      And when you show them proof or tell them the truth or ask them to look at a few verses in the Hebrew text- they curse you!!!!!!!!!!! ( cf. Matt. 5:11 & 12)

  • @slwebb17
    @slwebb17 10 років тому

    Concerning the KJV, how do KJV only proponents deal with King James as a Homosexual?

    • @DrBob1611
      @DrBob1611 10 років тому +2

      We don't have to deal with it, for King James was not a homosexual. Research it for yourself slwebb17.

    • @rdknight6
      @rdknight6 10 років тому +1

      1st off all there is no historical record of King James being homosexual. 2nd of all, King James didn't translate the original languages into the English Bible called the King James Bible; the 54 Hebrew and Greek scholars did! So get your facts straight and then you can construct your argument that that will fail in the light of historical facts!

    • @DrBob1611
      @DrBob1611 10 років тому

      Come on guys, please at least do a modicum of research before spouting out things that you have heard about King James IV. Sodomite, give me a break....

    • @DrBob1611
      @DrBob1611 10 років тому

      If any of us had just half the knowledge that King James had as a linguist our thinking would not be like a shallow parrot as some of these absurd remarks. It's common knowledge that King James did not translate any of the Bible that was named after him. RESEARCH ON KJB PAGES BEFORE COMMENTING PLEASE.

  • @leonelaccordingtothescript9091
    @leonelaccordingtothescript9091 6 років тому

    HalleluYAH, The Good News
    Praise you YAH ( YH יה ) ( יהוה YHUH ) YAHUEH our Heavenly Father and יהושוע YAHUSHUA​ יהושע His Son, (HA MASHIYACH ה משיח) THE MESSIAH our Master.
    Tehillim / Psalms 9:10 And those who know Your NAME will put their trust in You;
    For You, YAHUEH, have not forsaken those who seek You.
    Yaḥanan / John 17:3 And this is Life Eternal, that they should know you the only True Elohim and HIM whom you did send, even YAHUSHUA The Messiah.
    Eph`siyim / Ephesians 1:12-14 that we who first trusted in MESSIAH should be to The praise of HIS glory.
    In Him you also trusted, after you heard The WORD of TRUTH, THE GOOD NEWS of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were SEALED with The Holy Spirit of Promise, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until The Redemption of The Purchased Possession, to the praise of His glory.
    Qorintiyim Aleph / 1 Corinthians 15:1 Now I make known to you, Brethren, THE GOOD NEWS which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are SAVED, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, except you believed in VAIN. 3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that the MESSIAH DIED FOR OUR SINS According to The SCRIPTURES; 4 and that HE WAS BURIED; and that HE HAS BEEN RAISED ON THE THIRD DAY According to The SCRIPTURES. (2Cor.5)
    Romiyim / Romans 2:16 in the day when ELOHIM shall judge the secrets of men, according to my GOOD NEWS by YAHUSHUA THE MESSIAH.
    Romiyim / Romans 2:24
    For “the name of ELOHIM is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you,” as it is written.
    Eph`siyim / Ephesians 3:19 and to know the LOVE of THE MESSIAH which passes KNOWLEDGE, that you may be filled to all the FULLNESS of ELOHIM. 20 Now to HIM that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that works in us, 21 to HIM be the Glory in the assembly and in THE MESSIAH YAHUSHUA to all generations forever and ever. Truly.
    Romiyim / Romans 10:8 But what does it say? THE WORD is near you, in your MOUTH, and in your HEART: that is, THE WORD OF FAITH, which we preach: 9 because if you shall CONFESS with your MOUTH that YAHUSHUA IS SOVEREIGN, and shall BELIEVE in YOUR HEART that ELOHIM raised HIM from the dead, you shall be saved: 10 for with the HEART man BELIEVES to RIGHTEOUSNESS; and with the MOUTH CONFESSION is made to SALVATION. 11 For the scripture says, Whoever believes on HIM shall not be put to shame. 12 For there is no distinction between Yahudi (Jew) and Greek: for the same Master is SOVEREIGN of all, and is rich, to all that call on HIM: 13 for, whoever shall call on the name of The Master shall be SAVED.
    14 How then shall they call on HIM in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in HIM whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?
    Yahanan Aleph / 1 John 3:23 And this is HIS COMMANDMENT, that we should BELIEVE in the NAME of HIS SON YAHUSHUA THE MESSIAH, and LOVE one another, even as HE gave us COMMANDMENT. 24 And he that keeps HIS COMMANDMENTS lives in HIM, and HE in him. And by this we know that HE lives in us, by THE SPIRIT which HE gave us.
    Tehillim / Psalms 78:10 They did not keep The COVENANT of ELOHIM;
    They refused to walk in His law.
    Tas`loniqim Bet / 2 Thessalonians 1:7 and to you that are afflicted rest with us, at the revelation of the Sovereign YAHUSHUA from heaven with the angels of his power in flaming fire, 8 rendering vengeance to them that do NOT know ELOHIM and to them that do NOT obey the GOOD NEWS of our Sovereign YAHUSHUA.
    Eph`siyim / Ephesians 5:6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these the wrath of ELOHIM comes upon the sons of disobedience.
    Tehillim / Psalms 91:14 “Because he has set his LOVE upon Me, therefore I will deliver him;
    I will set him on high, because he has known MY NAME.
    Tehillim / Psalms 25:14 The secret of YAHUEH is with those who fear HIM, And HE will show them His COVENANT.
    Mattithyahu / Matthew 26:28 For this is My BLOOD of THE NEW COVENANT, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
    Tehillim / Psalm 145:17 YAHUEH is Righteous in all His ways, And gracious in all his works. 18 YAHUEH is near to all them that call upon HIM, To all that call upon HIM in TRUTH. 19 He will fulfil the desire of them that fear HIM; He also will hear their cry, and will SAVE them. 20 YAHUEH preserves all them that LOVE HIM; But ALL the WICKED will he destroy. 21 My mouth shall speak the PRAISE of YAHUEH; And let all flesh bless HIS SET APART NAME for ever and ever.
    Eph`siyim / Ephesians 2:14-22
    For He Himself is our PEACE, who has made both ONE, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in HIMSELF ONE NEW MAN from the two, thus making PEACE, and that HE might Reconcile them BOTH to ELOHIM in ONE BODY through the stake, thereby putting to death the enmity. And HE CAME and PREACHED PEACE to you who were afar off and to those who were near. For through HIM we both have access by ONE SPIRIT to THE FATHER.
    Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but FELLOW-CITIZENS​ with the saints and members of the HOUSEHOLD of ELOHIM, having been built on the FOUNDATION of the APOSTLES and PROPHETS, YAHUSHUA MESSIAH HIMSELF being THE CHIEF CORNER-STONE, in whom the WHOLE building, being fitted together, grows into a HOLY TEMPLE in THE MASTER, in whom you also are being built together for a dwelling place of ELOHIM in THE SPIRIT.
    Tehillim / Psalms 68:4 Sing to ELOHIM, sing praises to HIS NAME: Cast up a highway for HIM that rides through the deserts;
    HIS NAME is יה YAH;
    and exult before HIM.
    5 A Father of the FATHERLESS, and a DEFENDER of the widows, is ELOHIM in HIS holy habitation.
    Mattithyahu / Mathew 22:37And יהושע / יהושוע YAHUSHUA said to him, " ‘You shall LOVE YAHUEH יהוה your ELOHIM with all your heart, and with all your being, and with all your mind. (Deu. 6:5)
    38 “This is The First and Great Commandment.
    39 And the second is like it, ‘
    You shall LOVE your neighbour as yourself. (Lev19:18)
    40 On these two commandments hang all The LAW and The Prophets.
    Romans 8:1 There is, then, now NO condemnation to those who are in Messiah YAHUSHUA, who do not walk according to The Flesh, but according to The Spirit.
    Romans 8:11 And if The Spirit of Him who raised YAHUSHUA from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Messiah from the dead shall also give Life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit dwelling in you.
    Proverbs 1:23 “Turn at my reproof. See, I pour out my SPIRIT on you, I make my words known to you.
    John / Yahanan 8:31 So YAHUSHUA said to those Yahudim who believed Him, “If you stay in MY WORD, you are Truly My taught ones,
    32 and you shall know The TRUTH, and The TRUTH shall make you FREE.”
    33 They answered Him, “We are the seed of Abraham, and have been servants to no one at any time. How do you say, ‘You shall become free ?”
    34 YAHUSHUA answered them,
    “Truly, Truly, I say to you, everyone doing Sin is a SERVANT of Sin.
    35 “And the servant does NOT STAY in THE HOUSE forever - A SON STAYS FOREVER.
    36 “If, then, The Son makes you FREE, You Shall Be FREE Indeed.
    1 Peter 4:14 If you are reproached for the Name of Messiah, you are blessed, because The Spirit of Glory and of Elohim rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is praised.
    Yeshayahu / Isaiah 64:8 And now, O יהוה YAHUEH, You are our Father. We are the clay, and You our potter. And we are all the work of Your hand.
    Eph`siyim / Ephesians 2:10 For we are His workmanship, created in Messiah YAHUSHUA unto GOOD WORKS, which Elohim prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому +1

    2 Timothy 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known
    the holy scriptures, which are able to
    make thee wise unto salvation through
    faith which is in Christ Jesus.
    God's word cannot be changed, altered nor translated & still be the words which proceeded out of his mouth.
    Enoch was translated.
    The kingdom of Saul was translated to David.
    The saints are delivered from the power of darkness, and translated into the kingdom of the Son of God.
    There are no lines to shew the word of God is translated

    • @jerrylisby5376
      @jerrylisby5376 4 роки тому

      The next verse says All scripture is GIVEN by inspiration of God. What Timothy had was a translation from Hebrew into Greek and Paul called it scripture. He said that translation was inspired. A translation God is involved in is always better than the original! Just like when we believers will be translated and GIVEN new glorified bodies.

  • @REEFBLUENOTCH
    @REEFBLUENOTCH 9 років тому

    While many state that this is a divisive issue, they point to all the OTHER versions as being the problem. Sadly however, many of the KJV Onlyism crowd stands to take the blame on many fronts. It's like, it's my way or the highway. It's like an exclusive club with a lot of snobbery. Those who don't have their head in the sand might remember a number of years back when Jack Hyles was around and going thru some public "fires" if you would, when people were actually asking other believers, "Are you with Bro Hyles, or against him?" I believe there were buttons that the students wore(?)...I may be wrong, but there was a phone blitz put on by so many that would call pastors and former students up asking if they were "FOR" Bro Hyles. Same difference here with KJV. Those who are staunch defenders of the KJV want to throw the gauntlet down, while holding another one in the other hand, ready to stab them if they're not for the KJV. Sad commentary that has been noted by those that know not Christ.

    • @paigeb1318
      @paigeb1318 8 років тому +1

      +REEFBLUENOTCH It IS an exclusive club...`Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few be there that find it.'

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    Adam had a copy of the book of Luke as did Theophilus before Luke wrote his copy for the first time; and when Luke wrote his copy, Adam knew scripture would be fulfilled at that time. Read Luke 1 lines 1 through 4.
    The book of Daniel is called scripture before Daniel wrote his copy.
    Read Daniel 10 line 21 through 11 line 2.
    Matthew 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written,
    Man shall not live by bread alone, but by
    every word that proceedeth out of the
    mouth of God.
    When? (Isaiah 46:9,10)

  • @superhoga
    @superhoga 11 років тому

    He gives some decent arguments at the end, but they are arguments to all use the same version, not necessarily his favorite.

  • @gregsettle5880
    @gregsettle5880 11 років тому +1

    Darren - You created a strawman argument! No one, certainly not me is saying that every bible version is from God! Because Wescott as a child was in some silly club, you are really going to hold that against him? Where does it state in the bible that all bible translators r going to be perfect and sinless? Did u realize that King James himself was bisexual? The Encyclopedia described him thusly "He disdained women,and fawned unconscionably on his favorite men" There are no sinless people!

  • @biblebaptistchurchglasgows1299
    @biblebaptistchurchglasgows1299 5 років тому +1

    wow thank you for this message on the King James version of the Bible. we use it here in Scotland the place where King James was born and raised. Unfortunately though this is a country that has turned it's back on God for the most part.

  • @michaelgriswold1809
    @michaelgriswold1809 8 років тому

    God's Word has always been inspired and perfect even before the King James Bible. The Geneva Bible came to America first.

    • @djayfriMusic
      @djayfriMusic 5 років тому

      With all the modern versions are those to inspired by the Lord Jesus?

    • @jerrylisby5376
      @jerrylisby5376 4 роки тому +2

      The modern versions are inspired too...by the god of this world.

    • @Sam-tk6us
      @Sam-tk6us 5 місяців тому

      ​@@jerrylisby5376The KJV only cult is from the God of the world.

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    Psalm 89:34 My covenant will I not break, nor alter
    the thing that is gone out of my lips.
    Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven
    and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in
    no wise pass from the law, till all be
    fulfilled.
    Psalm 68:11 The Lord gave the word: great was the
    company of those that published it.
    Jeremiah 36:18 Then Baruch answered them, He
    pronounced all these words unto me with
    his mouth, and I wrote them with ink in
    the book.
    Now read Proverbs 22 lines 20 and 21.

  • @jamesfoard4635
    @jamesfoard4635 8 років тому

    2 Kings 13:1-10 does not add up chronologically in any of the Bibles, including the King James. From "the three and twentieth year of Joash the son of Ahaziah king of Judah" (2 Kings 13:1) to "the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah" (2 Kings 13:10) you cannot come up with seventeen years, no matter how you stretch it.
    Proverbs 5:16 in the KJV is translated as a declarative injunction " Let thy fountains be dispersed abroad, and rivers of waters in the streets" seemingly advocating promiscuity and is out of context with the surrounding texts advocating chastity and marital fidelity. In fact Proverbs 5:16 should be read as a rhetorical question, as most modern versions have it, "SHOULD your fountains be dispersed abroad, streams of water in the streets?" (NKJV}, and in this CORRECT context it runs smoothly from the previous verse 5:15 and is answered by the following four verses.
    Here is proverbs 5:15-5:20 to demonstrate, from the New King James, the appropriateness of the updated version of Proverbs 5:16
    15 Drink water from your own cistern,
    And running water from your own well.
    16 Should your fountains be dispersed abroad,
    Streams of water in the streets?
    17 Let them be only your own,
    And not for strangers with you.
    18 Let your fountain be blessed,
    And rejoice with the wife of your youth.
    19 As a loving deer and a graceful doe,
    Let her breasts satisfy you at all times;
    And always be enraptured with her love.
    20 For why should you, my son, be enraptured by an immoral woman,
    And be embraced in the arms of a seductress?
    There are more examples, although personally the Lord has led me by His Spirit (I only speak for myself) to stay with the textus receptus, both in English and in Spanish.

    • @Jer20.9
      @Jer20.9 8 років тому +1

      Looks fine to me, the KJV is perfectly understandable here, and as far as being clear as to sexual matters, the KJV uses that nasty plain word "fornication" where other versions use "sexual immorality" which allows the reader to decide for themselves what morality might be. "It's not immoral, we love each other", unfortunately I have seen it happen in church.

  • @63stratoman
    @63stratoman 7 років тому

    Yeah, and the Children of Israel could reach right into the Ark of the Covenant and read that "Original Text" any time they wanted to right?

    • @destaylor7841
      @destaylor7841 5 років тому

      Amen brother

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      Synagogues read the Torah in HEBREW. A KJV Onlyist wouldn't last 5 min. hearing the ORG. Hebrew being read.

  • @Imsaved777
    @Imsaved777 Рік тому

    If the King James Bible was good enough for John the Baptist, well then that’s good enough for me too.

  • @dennisrew1003
    @dennisrew1003 11 років тому +1

    This whole presentation is based on the "assumption" that the KJV is the preserved word even though in his own words he says it is "400 years old." The very same arguments he uses against new versions could used and were used when the KJV was first printed. Just read the original preface to the KJV. Those translators battled the same arguments, and yet they worked hard to make it very readable for the common person (consider the italicized words that were included)

  • @BerylBoanerges
    @BerylBoanerges 11 років тому

    Job 34:3 For the ear trieth words, as the mouth
    tasteth meat.
    4 Let us choose to us judgment: let us
    know among ourselves what is good.
    1 John 4:BELOVED, believe not every spirit, but
    try the spirits whether they are of God:
    because many false prophets are gone out
    into the world.
    While trying this man's words and doctrine, this can not be said of the man:
    Matthew 7:29 For he taught them as one having
    authority, and not as the scribes.

  • @shultman37
    @shultman37 10 років тому +2

    Not sure that Rick Flanders looks at the scholarly portion of how biblical translation came about and what it means. All of the translations are viable in biblical truth.

    • @Obediah002
      @Obediah002 6 років тому

      No they are not, I have tried these modern versions and have found them lacking.

  • @tdickensheets
    @tdickensheets 3 роки тому

    Then show me in KJV where God or Jesus said "Read KJV only or go to hell."

  • @grotebeer53
    @grotebeer53 9 років тому

    can anyone please explain me.. GENESIS 19;30 .. sounds like porn.. this can't be the original bible

    • @resistingthedowngrade9375
      @resistingthedowngrade9375 8 років тому

      +Grote Beer Genesis 19:30-38 is historical narrative recounting the despicable act of Lot's daughters (probably as a result of having been raised in Sodom). In verses 37 & 38 you'll see that this is where the pagan Moabites and Ammonites came from. They were a thorn in the side to Israel all the way through to the Babylonian Captivity.
      To think that this account is "porn" or condoning the wickedness of Lot's daughters is to completely misunderstand the point of the narrative.