Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Sphere Inside out Part - II
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 кві 2008
- it is possible to turn a sphere inside out in 3-space with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease, a process often called sphere eversion (eversion means "to turn inside out").
5:56
Guy: I still dont understand, is there some other way to look at this?
Girl: *irritated silence* .............Ok.
WHAT DID YOUR BRAIN TURN INSIDE OUT?
+Richard Peterson yes.yess it did
XD
xD
XD
Respect to the animators... full respect...
Especially for how old this is.
Exactly what I was thinking.
yeah ^^
InfinityCraft 1994 This is crazy for that time.
Raedo i agree this is amazing event if the quailty is 240p
damn. if my math teachers had ever been as patient with me as the lady is with the guy in this video, maybe i would understand math.
+Dave Strider I know that's a joke kinda, but damn is it true.
Basic math is harder to teach.....but once the basics are done the other visualizations become easier. I envy those who were patient enough to learn higher math. I failed most classes because I wouldn't do homework
+Dave Strider truuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
+Dave Strider man it's true.
+Dave Strider I dunno man the guy in the video is asking pretty smart questions and he also understands after the first explanation. If I were as smart as he, then I would be a math major.
Everyone, quit complaining about how this video is "breaking the laws of physics and making dumb rules when we are already doing completely impossible things". Turning numbers need to be preserved, so no breaking or pinching. And how else would you turn a sphere inside out if you can't pass it through itself? This is a mathematical thought experiment that is applied and interesting, not a physical experiment meant to teach you how to actually turn a beach ball inside out.
And for heaven's sake, respect the animators and the script writers. This is actually very well written and adresses many questions brought up. If this is comfusing to you, watch it again step by step and try your best to understand it, don't complain your head off in the comments section, if you can't understand it it's not entirely the video's fault...
Alicia Zhi Agreed. I don't fully understand all the topology behind it but I know that the seemingly arbitrary rules are just ways to put into words that we can understand the mathematical rules that are already in place, not too different from comparing addition to putting apples from two boxes into a single box, or negative numbers as owed money.
As for the material being able to go through itself, this may be impossible in 3 dimensions but in 4 dimensional space it's perfectly reasonable. Imagine you're inside a circle and you want to leave it without breaking through; if you live in three dimensional space it's obvious that you can just go over or under the circle but that would sound like you're "breaking physics" in a two-dimensional world.
Alicia Zhi Really, but reading the comments seems just there was a raid from some of those social networks populated by kids (4chan?)
+Alicia Zhi
What do you mean it breaks the laws of physics, I thought this was an applicable way to model particle spin by warping the spacial axis instead of the particle its self. Oh well, I suppose we just care about this problem for no good ol reason then.
+Alicia Zhi You can melt the sphere into liquid, remold it, then painting the inside yellow and the outside purple! GENIUS!
+Alicia Zhi The irony is people won't respect your opinion because of your weeaboo profile pic, even though what you said is correct and well stated.
Also, thank you, I was having troubles turning my spheres inside out
Me too, all of my friends could turn their spheres inside out, but I couldn't and felt left out. But now, thanks to this video, I am able to join in with my friends when they turn their spheres inside out
That's what she said 😁
don't question it...
Just don't worry.
When you're 11 they will explain it at school and teach you how to do this.
They even give practice lessons!
dude you need a matereal that is pisicly inpossipel
Jesus imagine trying to figure this out before we had programs to visualize it. Some people are amazing !
+Louis Skrzypczak IKR!
+Louis Skrzypczak They had Belts though.
+walkingonwater I didn't know belts could go through each other. You learn something knew everyday.
+Michael LastName rekt
They had extra powerfull processors in their heads.
God damnit I did not want to watch this but that cliff hanger really did me in.
Same here
Same lmao
yup
I don't even know how I got to watching the first one. hope there isn't a third
omg me too
3M people didn't see the whole explanation. Like how.
+Mili Klimis maybe one video was enough for them to figure it out for themselves
+zbelekas No it wasnt.
+Mili Klimis Well. This is actually doesn't teach anybody anything. The actual math behind it is where the usefulness comes in.
+Mili Klimis Half of them got tired of "complicated" math and some of them was too stupid to look for part 2
Well, I've watched the first video five times, but that might just be me :P
I will apply this to my everyday life
+bobby bob A giant sphere attacked me the other day and the only way to defeat it was to theoretically turn it inside out.
+bobby bob not everything out there to learn is necessary, people came here to learn something new
+bobby bob
If I eat the right small piece of paper, this becomes my life.
+Marley Cameron Are you Number 6?
Sagar Patel Wat?
i ship male voice with female voice
yes.
john jon I do too
i trying to imagine the image that will make of two sounds ma...
Karen McNenny and Paul de Cordova you mean
I feel like this is one of those times we need to separate the characters from the actors.
imagine having to explain this to the graphic designers who made this :P
Probably it was very easy for them to understand.
Self intersecting geometry is just something you can do in 3d software.
“Okay remember to intersect the bands through the center.”
“WHAT???”
@@FelipeBudinich or you know, it was just mathematicians who did it since they usually have to use 3d models in programming to visualise stuff such as this.
@@coolsvilleowner Yes, it could have been anyone that has handled or developed 3d modelling software.
I don't understand. I thought this video was the manuscript?
For everyone who wants an application for this math. Look up particle half spin.
A model like this can be used to model the spacial warping that allows for particle half spin. This needs to be modeled for quantum mechanics and also effects chemical applications. Funny enough someone said that more effort should be put into curing AIDS, well funny enough.
The proper modeling of quantum systems allows us to do advanced x-ray crystalography, which we can grow crystals of viruses and determine the entire virus' protein structure. From that we determine the mechanism for attack using protein folding simulations, which require this again for the quantum analysis. Then that same quantum mechanics has been getting adopted into chemistry for the last 50 years to help create the drugs which target the attack mechanisms.
So this math is literally curing AIDS at several points along the process, it has also helped cure many serious viruses in the past.
Your welcome!
+HaydenHatTrick
*You're
But nice comment and a great video
+gruzuff you wanna go further? *affects
+gruzuff maybe they meant it's the OP's welcome...
+HaydenHatTrick I think the "wave" part of the lecture is somewhat related with string theory.
+HaydenHatTrick Thanks for revealing how something as intriguing but abstract as this also has real-world value. As an analogue, I imagine when people first played with power series, its utility was questioned until its use in trigonometry, exponentials, imaginary numbers, computing PI, etc. was discovered.
I no longer fear death
I no longer fear the stuff beef you sucks
Sphere inside out unknown educational software
Rumor has it, this is the afterlife...
Who the fuck got up in the morning and thought "Man, how could I turn a sphere consisting of material that can pass through itself but dissolves when being bend in a sharp bend, inside out?"?
Mir fällt kein Name ein, was dagegen? i did
A topologist.
Touche...
Mir fällt kein Name ein for the moment, but you could ask some mathematicians. They seem to be the kind of people who wake up with such thoughts on their mind.
Becuase thats the only way to turn a sphere inside out.
Lol this lady is so patient with this man.
Potter Pap ikr
I mean, her name is Karen.
dream teacher
Fake. I tried doing it with my basketball, did not work!
watch the first part
Battle Factory Brain - Thornton Oh ok, thank you. I tried it again after watching the first part. It does work now.
+Ninten Onett same
OMG I fucking cried when i read this LOLED SO HARD !!!!! Especially at the part where you say that it DOES WORK now ahahaha !!!!! :'''' D
Can confirm!
Thank you, all of my friends could turn their spheres inside out, but I couldn't and felt left out. But now, thanks to this video, I am able to join in with my friends when they turn their spheres inside out
Paul K Lenny face
Not just any old spheres. Spheres made of a material which can pass through itself, but which you cannot tear. Obviously.
what even fucking is this
Joanna Carlson Spheres made of a material which can pass through itself, but which you cannot tear. Obviously.
i lol'ed
Looked for how to untangle shoelaces. Not disappointed.
"First, assume the shoelace is a perfect sphere..."
+David Coats xD
+David Coats No, first assume the shoelace is made of a hypothetical material that can pass through itself, but not form any sharp crease.
1:03 i was expecting massive edm drop
i didn't see this video for a long time, now that i've come back i saw your comment and i lol'd so fucking hard
Ahjebemjatvojho i can make you one
But then we got "oo key"
World logic - Educational and intelligent movies- 240p. Stupid fails - 1080HD
+Badguy10097 ;c
Lol
+Badguy10097 this is a heavily downscaled version, though. The original is 1080p and even more excellent. This video uploader obviously does not know how to computer, he probably ripped it from some shitty blog or something
+Benign Lover This movie is from 1994.
>educational
>half of the laws listed in this video are made up by the directors
Thank God I know this now. I'm gonna be great at parties.
*walks up to a girl*
hey girl you wanna know how to Theoretically turn a sphere inside out?
"...you know, I can turn you inside out, theoretically"
*girl calls the police, as I would*
Hey girl, wanna learn about The Anatomy of the State and spheres?
This is actually a well thought out video. It explains everything in great detail, and the man asked all of the questions that would have arisen.
How did I find you here.
?
***** I saw your Rubik's Brand 5x5 video. Then randomly I find you here.
woah i'm famous
My brain did the same animation while watching.
LOL
lol
LOL
lol
lol
Time for my daily dose of turning a sphere inside out.
back for my daily dose
@@blaketto It's awesome that you kept coming!!
@@MissRoux yes and i finally understood it!!!!
You don't need drugs to get high, just watch this
Exactly😂😂😂
+itZzDoritos why?
I actually did smoked some weed be4 watching this
Lmao rofl
lol
This video changed my life.
woodfur00 mine turtle
TheDeathBallzMM Hello!
+woodfur00 Totally turned my life around.
this video turned me inside out😎😎😎
This video made my mind still twisted.
So pass it, twist it, pull it and then I Bopit?
lmaoooooooo
Diego R thank you, SO much
Diego R yo this had me crying lmfaooo
these comments are the reason I'm still alive....
MellowMaroon you don't get the joke do you?
I like how almost everyone came here from part one and they aren't sure whether it was worth it or not.
definitely worth it....when the sphere turned itself inside out I nearly teared up.
After watching it twice, and a few weeks of critical thinking, and watching it 57 more times... I'm still not sure if it's worth it...
I'm gonna go troll some liberal idiots on some social justice videos instead... *THAT'S ALWAYS WORTH IT!!!!!*
hahaha
John Doe I saw your user name and I thought, that sounds like a troll name. I may have been correct...
I like how this was posted before part one
Why am I watching this... For the third time?
I feel u bro
'coz it's amazing that you can do this.
subh1 Theoretically of course :), where an elastic can move through itself and twist 360 degrees.
CoTeCiOtm cuz you didn't understand the first and second time
ThePowerpoon lol
... can I be a disembodied voice with complete, intuitive control of any geometric object?
YO XIDNAF! Didn't expect you here.
okay but how do you turn a sphere inside out
ok, I did, but how do you turn a sphere inside out
cool thanks for tip flowey
You take it to Disney Studios.
cool thanks for the tip santiago
oh another great tip. thanks clerisvisitor
Welp I just spent 20 minutes learning how to turn a sphere inside out under certain rules. Cool.
Infectious Frostbite Holy fucking hell, why are you everywhere :O
Infectious Frostbite it's in his name
I am wtching this while being dead drunk and I'm having the best tim of my fucking life
ur*
Ana Axolotl I'm so high
How on earth did they create such animations back then?
To me it is endlessly impressive.
It's just a year before Toy Story. CG had been around for a while, although the software was admittedly much more cumbersome.
leoest3 Oh really? from the looks I assumed this to be from the early 90s.
The rendering must have taken hours though.
well this is from 1994
@@nenntmichbond toy story came out in 1995
I feel my brain theoretically turning inside out. Somebody should make a movie about it.
+Commander Batty Somebody should make a meme about it.
1:33 Krekt
Emil Macko how and why the hell are you here?
omg i died when i read this thank you
Emil Macko Just waiting for Project Opia now
3:06 Cracked
hello robot cat maker
"told we how to untwist belt"
11/10 -ign
i wanna learn everything like how that dude did. life would be so fun
+Mizzy Mike *learning
+Mizzy Mike You can! You just have to stay curious every day of your life
Remember in the beginning it was simply poking a hole in and holy shit look at it now.
I honestly don't know why i wanted to watch this...
you watched a mathematical question evolved into this elegant portrayal of mathematical literacy that led to the epiphany of this method. thusly creating the precursor for possible new nations for computer science, physics, quantum mechanics and many other schools of thought when considering applications that play off this kind of mathematical theorem. For a man of science like me, this stuff is quite humbling.
+Lord Event Horizon
Oh shit, man. That vocabulary.
+Wj11jam
There. Got on the computer and edited the comment.
+Lord Event Horizon you got a dictionary with you all the time or what? Those are some big words.
indeed, but in promulgating your esoteric cogitation’s or articulating your superficial and sentimentalities and amicable philosophical or psychological observations, beware of platitudinous panderosity.
I feel like creating these animations would be just as difficult as the geometry they represent.
Not really. Time-consuming, yes, but not difficult. When you have a firm grip of the transformation, it's just a matter of planning out your geometry and rig appropriately.
holy shit, it's been years since i saw this video the last time
+Filip Mitevski (Filipo) Same, I think it's doing the rouds again ;)
Same
same
Same. Last I saw this, I had another account.
Same here....
I end up at this video every year or two, I think I almost understand this thing, maybe next year or two.
PROTLxONgame come back, its been a year. Time to learn again
@JewTube - Censor Yourself. Or we'll do it for you. nope, brain still twisted, ping me again in another 2 years pls
7:25 the s-ph-s-ph-sphere?
"the surface of the sphere"
Damn you really confused me there
5:55 "I still don't understand. Is there some other way to look at this?"
*Female Fifth-Dimensional being trying not to murder Male Fifth Dimensional Being*
"....Okay."
the sound effects were creeping me the fuck out
yes. same
***** its a cool video tho, but that damn sound effect is giving me severe cancer in my ass
i don't know if i should be relieved or regret that i went to part 2... this makes me question life
2am and i'm watching a video about how to turn a theoretical sphere inside out
2videos in fact
well but does a video that is obviously one opus actually become two videos simply because it´s been separated into two parts?
kinda. i didnt just stop watching after i realized what this is about, i clicked on the second part as well
5 am here
Same bro
Real World Example: Most people know what videos games are. As video game developers, we have to program our own physics into the game, because we control the laws of physics it allows us to take shortcuts in development. We have materials pass through each other all the time. Sometimes we break apart stuff and some times we put stuff together. Where we put stuff together creates a seam. Seams can be bad because of a visual effect called aliasing. Basically it creates bad looking stuff where we don't want there to be bad looking stuff. Part of the computer processing power is created to software called anti-aliasing, to get rid of the aliasing. Now if we can do things with out creating seams, it is better for the player.
Thank you. This all seemed very theoretical to me and I didn't see any application to it. Granted, I am a language major and know very little of math, but still.
but seams are part of real world. e.g. a corner of a house. the goal of anti-aliasing is to display the seam as realistic as possible, not to eliminate the seam.
GrandTheftChris
By seams I mean places where polygons overlap without connecting vertices. Not every model is going to come out correctly and there are going to be seam where they shouldn't be. I notice this all the time in Assassin's Creed Unity. They use a bright globe as the backdrop, so if there is a badly place seam in someplace like underground, you going to see white pixels twinkling through even with the anti-aliasing.
gwatson2006 I just finished my first semester in game design. Thank you for your explanation as to practical uses for this. I was trying to visualize how I could use this as something more than a project to recreate and understand.
Career Knowledge > Party Trick
What you saying is all about after rasterisation. What this video demonstrates is is about the preventing the breaking of topology without effecting the rasterisation of materials.
That really what my point was.
the 2 voice talents sounds like they are flirting each other with math.
Math is sexy.
Rok Krznar 69+0=69
wow
guy: this is great! somebody should make a movie about this stuff!
me: oh hell no plz don't
That would be my favourite movie. Screw Frozen and all that crap.
+mr_enderman77 It would be a better love story than Twilight. Somebody had to do that joke. Too soon?
+Mike Scan no, too late.
+Mike Scan why would you ask if it was too soon it's not like it's a 9/11 joke. ALLAHU AKBAR!!
Was it too soon to do a Jeffery Ross impersonation?
I wonder if those 2 narrators have any idea what they're talking about
most people had to learn at least a little bit about complex numbers (i.e., imaginary numbers) in high school. the whole time, you were thinking, how will this ever become useful in real life??? but engineers use complex numbers every day to solve real world problems.
so maybe figuring out how to turn a sphere inside out can be useful for physicists trying to determine spacial geometry. for example, the sphere could represent a region of space (which can pass through itself). for a layman, we probably wouldn't be able to understand the purpose, but that doesn't mean there isn't one.
i liked this, but i bet the graphics guy did not!
Somebody should make a movie about this stuff
Next video: how to solve paradoxes
First, corrugate the paradox. Then, rotate the paradox. Then, rotate the corrugations. Then, pull the poles past each other. Then, pull the corrugations through each other. Finally, flatten the corrugations. Oh wait, both sides were the same...
+TheEssentialHughJazz clever
Shit, my prototype A.I. died :(
"Somebody should make a movie about this stuff" *kills self*
I am 15 years old and my brain hurts from watching these two videos
OMG HEY RANDOM KPOPPER WHO IS JUST ME I MEAN I AM A KPOPER TOO AND I AM 15 AND IDK MY BEST FRIEND LET ME WATCH THIS IDK
***** Okay bud calm down.
Zelfon Jeon HELLO FELLOW KPOPPER ILY
lol our fandom is so loving xD
That's because your brain can't stand idiots wasting its time.
6:45, oh right, thanks i get it now. that made it so much easier to understand. Thank you so much.
Man, I had to say a few things after this...
1.) "Someone should make a movie out of this stuff!" Actually, as a budding filmmaker, I've become inspired to use this in a sci-fi movie with a person who can manipulate matter. I just have to find out how to use this in a practical way... not just because it looks cool.
2.) It's actually amazing how they were able to explain this in such a way that even a child could potentially understand it. It makes theoretical physics a much more approachable subject, and I wish more of it was this easy.
3.) Someone had quite a lot of time on their hands in order to even come up with this problem, let alone solve it... Glad those people exist!
I just love this for the animations
To each their own.
I'm just here for the sound effects.
I found the graphics rather intresting
My brain started to leak out of my ear.
I imagine the girl voice as Yuki Nagato and the guy voice as Kyon
What
Is it just me, or does the guy sound like Jiriaya?
weeaboo
Dope And General Studios
No? We just like anime. Nothin' wrong with that. It's just another form of art.
NitroNinja24 weeaboo
Honestly one of the coolest things on YT. And one of the derpiest.
8:49 "This is great! Somebody should make a movie about this stuff." Ha!
So to turn a sphere inside out you need to break the laws of physics?
Yes and no. It depends on the material. Practically, we don't have that, but theoretically you could make a substance where you can push the atoms between one another.
This is more string theory and relativity based than anything. Much like the Higgs Boson, until we get a physical example of something like this, we won't be able to fully learn how we can use it.
It's also the stuff that lets 3D models pass through other 3D models in software.
Abendschein Man you lost me
No item is completely solid. There are gaps between the atoms and molecules. So if you could push atoms/molecules between the gaps of OTHER atoms/molecules, you could theoretically have materials pass through one another.
Until we find/see a physical application for this kind of theory, we won't really understand how to use it.
Also, this kind of understanding is used to make program that are used for 3D modeling (like video game characters). Ever wonder how clipping occurs? It's this kind of a principle. It allows objects to pass through one another.
Abendschein Alright, so is or is it not possible right now?
Right now? Not that I know of.
Don't forget though, Relativity and the Higgs Boson weren't proven immediately either.
Man I had no idea that Wolfram has been around that long.
Typical math: Something is impossible yet somehow a deus ex machina is introduced (the waves) and boom it's "theoretically possible".
+Axel Trainwagon You shouldn't confuse a model for the system it models. A massless spring is a theoretical construct that does not exist in reality, yet it is indispensable if one ever hopes to understand how something as simple as a watch works.
+Axel Trainwagon exactly, I understand this helps people to visualize or maybe calculate some things but its not exactly whats happening in the real world. Its kinda like looking at a map to figure out where on the planet you are... lol best analogy I have right now. People would jump me and tell me I dont get it but I understand it just fine. The only thing I happened to think is that it my have some sort of implication at how structures are formed, biological like flowers... even proteins and chemicals but still like I said this is not exactly whats going on but I guess its the best thing we can figure as of now.
+Axel Trainwagon exactly, I understand this helps people to visualize or maybe calculate some things but its not exactly whats happening in the real world. Its kinda like looking at a map to figure out where on the planet you are... lol best analogy I have right now. People would jump me and tell me I dont get it but I understand it just fine. The only thing I happened to think is that it my have some sort of implication at how structures are formed, biological like flowers... even proteins and chemicals but still like I said this is not exactly whats going on but I guess its the best thing we can figure as of now.
+Axel Trainwagon - - yeah i feel that.. i mean anything theoretically is possible right?? imagine chopping an atom down to 1/100000000000 of its size.. i can show u that on a computer program or even on paper.. anyways key word is Theoretically. can't do this to a balloon.. basket ball or anything..
Fire in the head You could do that. But it isnt obvious how that could ever be useful. It is therefore a bad example.
I watched this video and part one a little over a year ago and I was just like, "da fuck?!". Now, I'm watching it again... AND IT MAKES SENSE!! It makes much sense this time!!
I'm watching this at 2 AM.... I think I have a Problem.
3:00 am the hour of the devil
I'm watching this on a holiday at friday night.... I think we both got problems
Darn. Only at the 1:00 am mark and I'm already here.
Increased difficulty: Watching it at 150% speed because it is too long. But it's not the first time I've seen it and just midnight, so that doesn't count...
3:30 AM
Videos like this are why youtube is my main source for entertainment.
this is why im not pursuing mathematics in college anymore
it's more like physics
Nobody knows if this is physically possible, though. Somebody would have to make a substance that fits the description in the video.
Maybe at some point in the future, forcefields could be generated in shapes? Who knows. Having a button that turns a forcefield ball inside out would be a fun way to kill somebody.
... How does one just think of that
Or just a sadist
"Hmmm...this is going to get complicated."
Lol, as if it wasn't already!
And still beautifully simplistic, once you get a grip on the one-ribbon part of it. It all makes sense at that point.
5:31 "Let me see the whole thing"
shit just got REAL
Yeah, you turn that sphere right there!
n o s t a l g i a
same here ;3;
You lost me at hello.
I'm astounded how many "things" I figured out myself when 1) I was three, four and five years old as I lay in bed waiting to fall to sleep - things like odd/even numbers, even prime numbers, numeric patterns and then 2) when I smoked weed as an adolescent - things like this kind of stuff, and how the universe repeats itself in its size and recycles itself in its time. So why is it true that...the older I get, the less intuitive I become to "things"? I don't like weed (never did, really), so I guess the intellect gained in being young or being high eventually gets replaced by a declining knowledge in things around us. Damn, there must be a mathematic formula to express that!
Hc
Joe Dougherty me too. although I am 11 turning 12in December I made up a theory in fourth grade that colors don't exist and we might not see the same colors even before i searched it up and got answers. I myself don't believe in anything that happens. I think everything is a part of my imagination. mostly because too many coincidences happen to me and my life is crazy, which makes it cliché. its cliché that I would make a world where everyone is doing stuff and I -------------(personal info) that's just weird. I would continue on with this but this message would be way too long hahaha. and I just think nothing is real and I except that and so now its as if everything is real because I pay that "fact" no mind. I swear to god if ur reading this u know who u r and u ugnore this as if the world is real and im just some normal persoN on the internet I will reach out and smack somebody I AM HINTING TO THE REAL PERSON GODDAMNIT.
(sorry for any spelling mistakes.... I didn't edit cuz im kinda lazy
Chelsea Thompson You should read Kurt Vonnegut. Read "Breakfast of Champions" (has nothing to do with Cheerios). He wrote that novel just for you - guarantee you.
Chelsea Thompson just think that other people have think the same thing, (i have thing that before when i was at your age and less), so, you're not the ruler of the world, your teory is a common, regular,standar, default idea of every person in this world, im no trying to be mean, just dont go so deep in something like that if you gonna end with that hypotesis. Keep that entusiams you'll be an important person. I dont speak english, so sorry if i whrite something bad.
This reminds me of GLADoS and Wheatley talking about something but if they did not hate each other and were a bit different
GLaDOS
+AwesomestarRockzGaming It took me so long to realize that GLaDoS is called GLaDoS because she's ironically not a "Glad OS" or "Glad Operating System", but that's what makes the name great.
I would watch the fuck out of any educational video if it was narrated by Steven Merchant and Ellen McLain
this makes me think of how we think it's impossible to move from point a to point c instantaneously through 3d space (instead of by traveling through 3d space normally), but if we consider the higher dimensions, there's definitely a way to do that. like how it was impossible to turn a circle inside out without disrupting its flow, until we moved into the 3rd dimension, where it's not just a circle anymore, but more like part of a sphere.
buuuut how do we move through 4d space at will?
Nice analogy
Consider that we already have 4 dimensions, it's time
+T0nuk4 that's what I meant ;]
but also I'm talking about pseudo sciences like alternate realities and astral travel (because we can access higher dimensions such as the 5th and beyond through our minds (it's already known that the psyche has more sway over physiology than has previously been understood), leaving our physical bodies behind,,, to return or not to this form later. maybe in a sense this is what dreams are and why they're always so weird) and we also have to do away with the concept of the 4th dimension being linear, it isn't. just because it's a line does not mean you can't move freely through it, but like the 1st dimension, time itself is only a pathway that's merged infinitely with infinite other pathways in the 5th, then infinite 5ths in the 6th, & so on...
Wow, this is great. Somebody should make a movie out of this!
...How the fuck did I get here?
i got here through weird rubix cubes.
stone sherrill
no way same
TheFlyingSniperTFS dont know how i got to weird rubix cubes :P
i got here from a program with a rig learning to walk to a program learning to play NES games then to talking about how... i forgot what i just watched and now here.
ryu24242424 Woah I watched that about a month ago. Potentially the same time you watched it according to youtube claiming your comment was one month ago.
i feel like i'm breaking the laws of nature by watching this
Hello, this is the nature police. You are under arrest for acting in violation of code AL1-C subcode T: Manipulation of matter inside a virtual 3-dimensional simulation with physics defying that of reality.
7:27 I EXPECTED A SEINFELD SO MUCH GOD DAMN LAUGHED AT A JOKE THAT WASN'T EVEN THERE
they can turn a sphere inside out, but they dont have hd video
It was 1994. They probably blew their entire budget rendering the damn thing.
this is so genius and so useless in reallife lol
Well no, as it proves that any 3d object is equivalent to its inside out counter part, which gives all kinds of interesting ideas in physics and engineering.
+Adam Collins (Test) that's amazing lol
I imagine this can be useful for computer science, especially 3d animation. how do you turn any 3d object inside out without causing stupid weird clipping issues. thus kind of helps with that I think
+Jokellum QM, relativity, cosmology, anything with curvatures and space
Bra it want by in the 4th DIMENSION .......... so for now yes but it will be useful latter
I already knew how to turn a sphere inside out. I just wanted to touch up on some things. If a sphere was made up of many microscopic points, it could theoretically pass through itself. Four points is too blurry. A million points is around 360p. 314 quadrillion is the 4K quality. With all these gaps, it would no longer be theoretical. But it would become actuality. Gases and liquids could perform this best. Don't get me started on plasma. But the only material that could pass through itself would either be a liquid of low density, or a gas with the same density. Then it would be even deeper to understand. How can you perform this? You would need a method to manipulate the particles into doing this. Liquid hangs in small groups by a thread. It won't come out perfectly, like all things, but it would show a rough explanation as to if this is possible. Gases are the easy family. Each particle is separate from each other. It would provide a finer example. But to "perfectly" create a sphere inside out, you would need to use some sort of godly material that could manipulate itself into doing this. Do you recall when I said something about plasma? Yup, even plasma can't make a perfect sphere. There is something out there that could theoretically perform this example. But in reality, it would be impossible due to other particles of sorts that interact with this every single time. It could never be done because of how this universe was created. In theory, anything is possible. But in reality, anything can tear, crease, fold, bend, etc.
Man that was a mouthful.
I was gonna explain that, but you hit it on the dot
nanotech ?
It's fun rewatching this video a couple years later. I wish it was 1080p though.
These two videos were absolutely fascinating... but can someone tell me the point of even trying to figure this out in the first place?
NerdMafiaSV Nothing lol. It's simply thought experiment. Think of the Grandfather Paradox. It has no application but people are still thinking of solutions for it.
just for people to test out their limit of imagination and ability to solve abstract problems that don't even exist.....which is kind of an exercise..
Jason Rorschach I can wrap my mind around that, thank you. XD
I can invert my mind around it! har har
I hope all spheres can do this in the w33d.420 version of our universe
Ayden Fragoso they already do
They just patched it in v. 90.01 of the laws of psychics.
Yeah, it was pretty abusable. The amount of time I was in the shop and someone would turn me inside out. Unbelievable.
Great! Now all I need is a material that can go through itself!
This is still my favorite strange video on youtube. It's simply... Beautiful.
One of the most creepiest videos that I had to watch pt. II. I come back to this video every year for some reason.
1994?! I thought the synth sounds and oldschool minimalist CGI felt very 90's, and it turns out I was right. ...I miss the 90's.
Check out the music from Com Truise.
aznazguy HI bob! HOW'S THE FAMILY?????
Lol
Now if I ever get trapped in a featureless space with a hypothetical material that can pass through itself I'll know how to have some fun.
who the fuck figured this out and why does it matter
A mathematician figured this out. Because mathematics.
JDMSubaru its math, and math can always be used somewhere in either physics or computing. It may has no real use now but it could have one in the future. The same progress always repeats itself, someone has a mathematical idea and sometimes in the future this idea can be used for something
For example, we're able to communicate over this website through our computers because someone (Alan Turing) theorized the existence of machines like computers. I don't know if that ever seemed pointless, but it had no real application for years.
alexander syguu Isn't it alright for some mathematicians to theorize this sort of stuff just to satisfy human curiosity and understand mathematics better?
Marcster George of course it is alright. Better understanding brings new ideas for the future too
You know it's a good movie when the credits involve phrases like master illusionist and technical Shepard.
What in the hell possessed someone to just sit down one day and be like, "Huh, I think I'll figure out how to theoretically turn a sphere inside-out using self-intersections but no creasing or puncturing..."
Curiosity and a propensity for mathematics. Higher level mathematics is filled with proofs that has no real-world application. At least not yet. You never know what the future holds :)
Only the truly dedicated make it to part 2
Why is this the most interesting presentation I have ever seen?
Ah yes.... My yearly rewatch of this has come by again