After decades on frontlines against India, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is moving past the conflict

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
  • #SecurityCode #IndiaPakistan
    For weeks, protests against economic hardship have gripped Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Even though the region shares little with Kashmir bar the name - not even ethnicity or language -it's been key to Pakistan’s claims against India. Finally, however, PoK seems to be moving on, leaving the Kashmir conflict behind.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Read full article here: theprint.in/opinion/security-...
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Exclusive content, special privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Connect with ThePrint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/subscribe/
    » Subscribe to our UA-cam Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
    » Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
    » Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
    » Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
    » Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintIndia
    » Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
    » Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @purujitparashar4642
    @purujitparashar4642 22 дні тому +32

    Bro the place they call Azad Kashmir is not even Kashmir. They don't even speak the language there.

    • @arjavgarg5801
      @arjavgarg5801 22 дні тому

      Ok what makes them kashmiri​@competitionplus798

    • @mk-cb7vc
      @mk-cb7vc 22 дні тому

      Entire kashmir issues is fake and misinformation Pak doesn't gives a fck about Kashmir or Kashmiris , all they really want is to capture the water resources which flows from Indian territory to Pakistani Punjab .
      Separatism , independence terrorism are just subversion so that Pakistani Punjabi can achieve its objectives

    • @sb9060
      @sb9060 22 дні тому +9

      ​@competitionplus798As if you speak kashmiri in your House 😂 !!!....

    • @purujitparashar4642
      @purujitparashar4642 22 дні тому +9

      @competitionplus798 🤣🤣🤣😂😂. As a bangladeshi i consider Pakistan west Bangladesh.

    • @user-tn5sm6gw3g
      @user-tn5sm6gw3g 22 дні тому +1

      ​@@purujitparashar4642
      Ouch!!! That hurt a lot😅

  • @manjulsaxena3531
    @manjulsaxena3531 22 дні тому +6

    Really thorough analysis digging deep into history. Full of hitherto unheard facts. The articulation is superb and the presentation graceful. Kudos!

  • @ndhrtd3624
    @ndhrtd3624 22 дні тому +8

    Dear Pak apologist & South Asian Mombatti-Biryani fan, THE ONLY REALITY IS THE INSTRUMENT OF ACCESSION. Rest is Pak BS

  • @Prayukth
    @Prayukth 22 дні тому +19

    pakistan is west Punjab...everything else will.become independent soon...pak is an unviable state...

    • @ravindra7791
      @ravindra7791 22 дні тому +3

      Everything else in Pakistan is a colony of Pakistani Punjab. Whether it's PoK or Balochistan or even Sindh.

  • @dboctj
    @dboctj 22 дні тому +9

    Borders are only lines on maps, India is bharat...a civilizational Nation....a real living idea shaped up over thousands of years. Pok and Pak will surely make it back into akhanda bharat..bharat mata ki jai.

    • @Redwood-sz9td
      @Redwood-sz9td 22 дні тому +2

      They have chosen Arab civilization. Let them do whatever they want within their area, We only need to care about our civilization within our borders.

    • @user_ar6332
      @user_ar6332 21 день тому

      We dont want 200 Million radicalised Muslims. they can keep their country.

    • @Shivu836
      @Shivu836 20 днів тому

      @@Redwood-sz9td exactly
      Akhand Bharat was one united Dharmic civilization that was the richest and most civilized society on earth for thousands of years
      If a certain group wants to follow a made up middle eastern religion, thats their shame, they cannot be part of Bharat anymore. They should be ousted from South Asia and go and ask Saudi or Egypt if they can have a place to stay in the desert lol

  • @k2lifter
    @k2lifter 22 дні тому +6

    Thanks for the history lesson. However, PoK will soon be a part of India. Therefore, we cannot accept the division of Kashmir

  • @munishchopra-evans4419
    @munishchopra-evans4419 22 дні тому +2

    Very informative. Thank you 🙏🏾

  • @jaymalhotra245
    @jaymalhotra245 22 дні тому +3

    If the presenter is stating that "reality" requires India to give up occupied GB Ladakh to Pakistan, that is completely unacceptable. That will never happen. However, adjustments of the PoK boundary, with no impact on the land integrity GB Ladakh region, are quite possible.

  • @jaishree427
    @jaishree427 22 дні тому

    Well explained.Thankyou Mr.Swami.😊

  • @justcurious40
    @justcurious40 14 днів тому +1

    What an irony - the antinational Print now has a defence strategist?? Hmm

  • @victor256in
    @victor256in 21 день тому +2

    Urban Naxal take on the issue

  • @zahidkramet-lq3xk
    @zahidkramet-lq3xk 7 днів тому

    Yeah! They're probably angling for a greater independent Kashmir!

  • @Ninjashank
    @Ninjashank 22 дні тому +7

    You seem so keen to give away pok. 😂😂

  • @pgl99
    @pgl99 22 дні тому +1

    "There was after all... no other way to get to Dadyal" 😅😅😅

  • @80sidd
    @80sidd 22 дні тому +6

    What was the point of this 😂 they broke now and no American money flowing in

  • @adityagupta101
    @adityagupta101 21 день тому +1

    Map of LoC is wrong, missing siachen

  • @exerjiexerji289
    @exerjiexerji289 7 днів тому

    Sir, reading para after para isn't effective. Please just have bullet points and talk directly, gazing into the viewer in normal spoken English for better engagement. If the viewer has to read a paper they'd do that. No disrespect intended just a honest feedback

  • @arnabsinha7341
    @arnabsinha7341 21 день тому

    All that is required is now to sign a paper

  • @s.p.6207
    @s.p.6207 22 дні тому +1

    Pok under Pakistan is vulnerable whereas j&k is happy with indian union. Pok people did mistake by joining Pakistan control.

  • @kpmurali1
    @kpmurali1 22 дні тому +2

    Few suggestions since I also watch CTC:
    1. There is duplication of coverage with CTC, as SG had covered this a few days back
    2. Kindly use Indian currency ( either in ₹ lacs or crores) . Not many may not be able to convert million $ to ₹. Maybe this was used cause of the context was PoK.. ( where ₹ is not relevant)

    • @Redwood-sz9td
      @Redwood-sz9td 22 дні тому +1

      One should always use both currencies when dealing with foreign funding (from London in this case), and when the audience is international as well as national, which might not apply here.

  • @RAJESHB3357
    @RAJESHB3357 21 день тому +1

    Sindh POK balochistan back to 🇮🇳

  • @parvadhami980
    @parvadhami980 22 дні тому

    Its neither Kashmir nor Azad

  • @Braveheart1502
    @Braveheart1502 21 день тому +1

    What was the need of speaking about unwanted history of POK. This episode has nothing related to the topic.
    Waste of time

  • @vijay-1
    @vijay-1 22 дні тому +2

    Not well explained

  • @praveenraj4683
    @praveenraj4683 22 дні тому

    Wow very interesting

  • @shainpv
    @shainpv 22 дні тому +2

    You forgot to give credit to UPA / Congress for this development, too.....

  • @adityabanerjee7145
    @adityabanerjee7145 21 день тому

    Reality will be very different when we are a 30 trillion dollar economy. Will build 3 houses in Baltistan, Gilgit and Mirpur.

  • @user-wg6mv4df6k
    @user-wg6mv4df6k 21 день тому

    nnnnnnnnnnnn
    The power to decide whether to remain independent / chose between India and Pakistan was under the British Parliament's Lapse of Paramountcy Act was given to the Ruler and not to the public. Pakistan should have challenged this Act in the House of Lords - Gilgit , Hunza , Baltistan , Mirpur , Muzzafarabad and also Chitral were parts of erstwhile Riyasat of Jammu and Kashmir which, in 1947 , legally acceded, in its entirety to India. Riyasats like Jammu and Kashmir , Kalat , Bahawalpur , Umerkot etc were covered under the Lapse of Paramountcy Act of British Parliament. We cannot be selective. Pakistan has absolutely no claim ,whether legal or moral , on even an inch sq of territory of the erstwhile Riyasat of Ja mm u and Kashmir

  • @indian9632
    @indian9632 22 дні тому +4

    Congress blunders

    • @wassuphomies263
      @wassuphomies263 21 день тому

      actually blame hari singh to be the complete idiot and oppress his muslim subjects. If the gilgit and baltistani people had not rebelled in the first place, the whole issue of kashmir would not have happened. They rebelled because there was an anti-muslim pogrom in Jammu during partition, where hari singh's forces just spectators and did not stop the violence.

  • @thakurabhinav
    @thakurabhinav 21 день тому

    Please accept the fact that your forte is analysis and NOT STORYTELLING. The flashbacks and forwards clutter up the story and mandate multiple rewatches. PLEASE avoid storytelling WITHOUT CONTEXT.

  • @PK-fl1lm
    @PK-fl1lm 21 день тому +2

    There is a leftist slant to the narration.

  • @mshaikh4879
    @mshaikh4879 21 день тому

    There are two basic errors in the presentation . Firstly lot of current instability in Pakistan is the effort of ethnic pathan lobby to gain absolute political and economic control of punjab and Sindh via Imran party , second is that rioting is what they say , reckless handling of economy . The IMF , Shehbaz combination and free rein by army to them is creating serious problem.for people and pathans in Kashmir took advantage to protest . Solution is not making line of control international.border but solution is conduct economic thinking . Could mean new judiciary , dismissal of political parties and serious economic planning. Pm of Pakistan is kashmiri , unthinkable in India ...

  • @samhariharan
    @samhariharan 21 день тому

    I am disappointed in this episode of the lack of precision in the language of Pravin Swamy, someone whose pieces I generally love and learn from. He uses the synecdoche "Islamabad" to represent the ruling establishment in Punjab. But he is using this in the time period he says after Ayub Khan's ascent to power in 1958. But as far as I recall, Karachi was the capital of Pakistan until 1959, after which it shifted to Rawalpindi until 1967 when Islamabad became the capital. During the period he was talking about, It was most likely Rawalpindi not Islamabad that was the capital and the Punjab establishment.

  • @deepakjain3578
    @deepakjain3578 21 день тому

    Pak mouthpiece

  • @daveprasad
    @daveprasad 3 дні тому

    praveen swamy puts you to sleep with his delivery...such a boring fellow. stick to writing

  • @devshetty7465
    @devshetty7465 22 дні тому +1

    Urban naxalite