Interesting. All my work would then be AI-assisted and doesn't need to be disclosed. I do wonder how they will know? Because I actually tried a horrifying exercise once where I took my 100% human written work into an AI-checker and every one of them said I had some kind of AI-assistance, which was INSANE, because again, 100% my words, and words I wrote actually about 2-4 years ago so long before AI was around, and now I wonder how if they will have bots that "flag" AI-content and how accurate those bots will be.
There was a story about a university Professor who failed all of his students because he ran their essays through a chat GPT analyzer and asked it if these were generated by chat GPT or not and every one of them came back is being generated by Chad gbt. And each student came back and showed proof that the essays were not AI generated, but the professor still persisted in giving them all zeros.
That’s fair I think. Good for all REAL artists. Hopefully they’ll stop complaining about AI being the end of human artistry. People won’t buy AI art. They’ll continue to support real artists.
It just shows Amazon is aware that there is a concern for AI generated stuff. Some AI programs don’t know the difference between copyright and new idea and blends them. I am old so I am not bothered by it. I can see the advantages for writers. Middle book syndrome is depressing. I bet an AI would remove that but I enjoy the suffering.
I think it's interesting that they're asking for this information and collecting it. I wonder if they are planning on making a change to the amount of money that they take as a cut from the cell or how much money you are allowed to collect for using AI generated content.
That's a relief to know there's a standard now. I was hoping to use AI to grammar and punctuation check my manuscript but was unsure if that would be a problem. Seems not, sweet.
Interesting. All my work would then be AI-assisted and doesn't need to be disclosed. I do wonder how they will know? Because I actually tried a horrifying exercise once where I took my 100% human written work into an AI-checker and every one of them said I had some kind of AI-assistance, which was INSANE, because again, 100% my words, and words I wrote actually about 2-4 years ago so long before AI was around, and now I wonder how if they will have bots that "flag" AI-content and how accurate those bots will be.
There was a story about a university Professor who failed all of his students because he ran their essays through a chat GPT analyzer and asked it if these were generated by chat GPT or not and every one of them came back is being generated by Chad gbt. And each student came back and showed proof that the essays were not AI generated, but the professor still persisted in giving them all zeros.
That’s fair I think. Good for all REAL artists. Hopefully they’ll stop complaining about AI being the end of human artistry. People won’t buy AI art. They’ll continue to support real artists.
It just shows Amazon is aware that there is a concern for AI generated stuff. Some AI programs don’t know the difference between copyright and new idea and blends them. I am old so I am not bothered by it. I can see the advantages for writers. Middle book syndrome is depressing. I bet an AI would remove that but I enjoy the suffering.
I think it's interesting that they're asking for this information and collecting it. I wonder if they are planning on making a change to the amount of money that they take as a cut from the cell or how much money you are allowed to collect for using AI generated content.
they'll just know what books to shadowban and bury so no one sees them.
That's a relief to know there's a standard now. I was hoping to use AI to grammar and punctuation check my manuscript but was unsure if that would be a problem. Seems not, sweet.
Thanks for sharing this update ❤
Any time!
@@SydneyFaithAuthoruse sudowrite or quillbot them are made for writers.
ur beautiful 👍