What is the ego? | Krishnamurti

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • Subtitles available in: English, Chinese, Dutch, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Thai, Vietnamese
    Extract from the fourth public talk in Saanen, 1979. Watch the full video at • J. Krishnamurti - Saan... ⠀
    • Free Booklet 'Nobody Can Teach You About Yourself’ | sub.kfoundatio...
    • Free Video Directories | sub.kfoundatio...
    • Free Newsletter | kfoundation.or...
    • Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Website | www.kfoundatio...
    • Introductory Video About the Foundation | • Krishnamurti Foundatio...
    • Online Store | store.kfoundat...
    • Krishnamurti Quotes | kfoundation.or...
    • Krishnamurti Books | kfoundation.or...
    • Photographs of Krishnamurti | kfoundation.or...
    • Introduction to Krishnamurti | kfoundation.or...
    • Krishnamurti Biography | kfoundation.or...
    • Selection of Key Krishnamurti Videos | kfoundation.or...
    • Krishnamurti Index of Topics | kfoundation.or...
    • Articles | kfoundation.or...
    • Urgency of Change - The Krishnamurti Podcast | apple.co/3pWV9Ak
    • Brockwood Park | kfoundation.or...
    • Book Your Stay at The Krishnamurti Centre | krishnamurtice...
    • Get Involved | kfoundation.or...
    • Instagram | / krishnamurtifoundation...
    • Twitter | / k__quotes
    • Facebook | / krishnamurtifoundation...
    • TikTok | / krishnamurtifoundation
    → Support Our Work • kfoundation.or...
    __
    We are a charity registered in the UK (Charity Number 312865)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 90

  • @aswathithrivikraman4970
    @aswathithrivikraman4970 Рік тому +28

    "Thought is the response of knowledge and memory, which is the past."

    • @francismadden8561
      @francismadden8561 Рік тому

      knowledge, experience is memory, which is the past

    • @MichaelConnell-zb8me
      @MichaelConnell-zb8me 19 днів тому

      And the past can't experience the present according to what K said,because it is so not because he said it's so

  • @TheTraveler2222
    @TheTraveler2222 Рік тому +92

    He is trying to point out the distinction between awareness and thought. The thinker has bought into the false premise of “I think therefore I am”. If we identify that we are no more than our thinking and our thoughts (the only instrument) then we are bound to suffer. However we are NOT our thinking or thoughts, we are the AWARENESS behind them, after all we are AWARE and we know when we are thinking and what thoughts we are thinking, we are the observer watching a movie but the ego have confused us into believing that we’re an actor or a participant in the movie. We are the awareness or the “I AM” behind them, that is the key to liberation!

    • @Allonenotalone
      @Allonenotalone Рік тому +3

      Thank for that Traveler.

    • @puramravana6500
      @puramravana6500 Рік тому +1

      Happy Journey traveler, thanks

    • @Ritziey
      @Ritziey Рік тому

      @@puramravana6500 😂

    • @jameschesterton
      @jameschesterton Рік тому +1

      Nicely put.

    • @robduijf2752
      @robduijf2752 Рік тому +7

      You lost me here, Traveller.
      There is no objective 'I' - the ego-non-ego-contradiction - in the brain, nor are there such objective structures as 'me', 'self' or 'psyche'. They are simply not there, they don't exist.
      There is only thought, playing the trick of identification, that fools us. And because we are not aware of this illusion, that virtual ego and the rest of it - division, thus conflict - comes into being, manifesting itself through our behaviour in reality. The individual is the manifestation of the ego, that wrongly claims: "I think, so I am", with all its identities and consequenses.
      So who is the 'I', the 'we' that claims: "I am aware"? What is awereness? The thing it self? Actually 'being aware'? There is only one way to find out and that is: being aware... But there is no 'I', no cognitive movement involved in this.

  • @aswathithrivikraman4970
    @aswathithrivikraman4970 6 місяців тому +4

    3:07 thought is the response of memory, which is the past. Thus thought is rooted in the past and is limited, narrow and can never be whole

    • @samsunny8642
      @samsunny8642 5 місяців тому

      You came back here after a year ? Did you kill your ego ?

  • @ledoragiv7001
    @ledoragiv7001 10 місяців тому +3

    When K talks, it's The Life who talks.

  • @Joshualbm
    @Joshualbm Рік тому +8

    The ego is the accumulation of thoughts and beliefs comprising one's sense of self but is an illusion. All egoic sensitivities can be observed. Therefore, none of them can actualize as anything more than transient and ephemeral experiences, witnessed from the non-transient, immovable, ever-present self. Even silence, emptiness... witnessing itself are phenomenal. What remains is what sees. Thou art that.

  • @roblox-vp1rq
    @roblox-vp1rq Рік тому +38

    He always wonders if we understand. Good thing it is here now for a very long time, giving us ample opportunity to go over this information until we properly get it. Thanks for the upload :)

  • @MsArtaUSA
    @MsArtaUSA Рік тому +19

    Thank you Lord for this wisdom that you convey thru your manifestation as Krishnamurti🙏🏻

    • @amsi8483
      @amsi8483 Рік тому +2

      you're thanking a concept

  • @TheNate206
    @TheNate206 Рік тому +9

    Leggo your ego

  • @mobiustrip1400
    @mobiustrip1400 Рік тому +3

    Freedom from wanting to "know" Hallelujah

  • @祈祈-q3x
    @祈祈-q3x Рік тому +4

    自我說 我只有那個工具 所以 它就把自己變成 只有那個工具 WOW 好棒的敘述 慕提老師

  • @itzcm6270
    @itzcm6270 Рік тому +4

    true genius. Thank you Krishnamurti !

  • @VicSC
    @VicSC Рік тому +5

    5:55 great analogy to explain it clearly and simply. I think it can be understood that thought being an interpretation of reality, by confusing it with reality, conflicts can appear.

  • @dr.sureshsaravdekar4410
    @dr.sureshsaravdekar4410 Рік тому +4

    Use of Ego , mind and thought ..
    Is like Digging with an instrument which has limited power to go deep deep inside for in search of truth..
    Thanks sir ji 🙏
    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @allsouls5997
    @allsouls5997 Рік тому +2

    Thinking doing good to the wrong people will by your kindness change things for good

    • @dej25
      @dej25 Рік тому

      Can you explain more? Thanks.

  • @ujjjval
    @ujjjval Рік тому +2

    *"Thought" is the response of knowledge and memory, which is the Past.* So the *"Thought"* is the Past, modifying itself all the time, but it is rooted in the Past. And *therefore it must always be limited, narrow, can never be whole.*
    ~JK

    • @surindersingh-uq4vl
      @surindersingh-uq4vl Рік тому

      When k says " Be light to thyself"
      Is it not a thought?
      How can you nullify the importance of thought.?
      We are what our thoughts have made us
      Lofty thoughts can take you out from your low Vibes

    • @ujjjval
      @ujjjval Рік тому

      When K said "Be light to thyself" means he indicated to higher *Self* not *little self* as we are.

    • @Infinitelynobody
      @Infinitelynobody 8 місяців тому

      ​@@surindersingh-uq4vl Sir we are the awareness of our thoughts but not our thoughts...

  • @ishapattanashettar9504
    @ishapattanashettar9504 Рік тому +1

    Thank you sir 🙏🙏

  • @elmarwagner2683
    @elmarwagner2683 Рік тому +4

    For all those who find it difficult to observe the me without a movement: You can observe your past. Just think about what you recently did and try to get some insight. Explore! If you want an insight that is different from your habits and conditioning, you need to look at the circumstances as if you were looking at a third person. What is (s)he doing? Is that correct? Can (s)he do it better? Choose a repetitive pattern to look at, because if you find out what you can do better, then you can do it better next time. If you got enough practice, you can start to observe the me as if it was s(he) at this very moment. An ideal way to learn to observe without a thought is to learn to observe the facts. Facts that have no room for thought.

    • @shwetashwarai9253
      @shwetashwarai9253 11 місяців тому

      How can an observer observe himself? Before this question, a question also arises that how do you know that "you", who is observing "himself" as an observer, is a true observer, is there anyone present to observe your observation?

  • @Deso958
    @Deso958 Рік тому +2

    As this is the only instrument we are born with and it is limited, we must find a way to transcend the limitation of thought. I suppose we must somehow have a kind of discernment between the limitation of thought and also the observer without thought. As this can be very difficult at the start and unpredictable, it is also possible. 😊

  • @WingZeroSymphonics
    @WingZeroSymphonics Рік тому

    Things run smoother

  • @sureshbhatt3183
    @sureshbhatt3183 Рік тому

    Considering ourselves as "I"it is called ego.

  • @googleg5877
    @googleg5877 Рік тому +1

    Greed which is inside all and fearful

  • @valdirbergamobergamo5396
    @valdirbergamobergamo5396 Рік тому +2

    Ele está correto. Com fogo não se pode ver o fogo, pois ficará embriagado com o fogo. Deve haver uma energia superior que permita observar o ego, com suas limitações e tempo. Pois somente o superior pode ver o inferior, iguais não se percebem. Ao ficar estático e ver os pensamentos que vão e vêm, o processo de desapego inicia, a desindentificação está a caminho; e o observador começará a ter mais energia. Se um fio da consciência for ativado por este ou outros meios, agora é só ampliar a observação, e o espaço entre o observador e a mente ficará cada vez mais óbvio. Grato pela intuição.

  • @claudiakuchling
    @claudiakuchling Рік тому +1

    Denken von GESEHENEM UND ERLEBTEN, muss nicht eine Reaktion hervorrufen.. ICH finde es nicht falsch, gerade für die Zukunft, dass meine "Gedanken" sich nach erlebten eine objektive Meinung über etwas bilden (ohne zu urteilen!), gerade um mein Denken zu erweitern. Den Egoismus weitestgehend hintanzustellen, sollte mit Sicherheit das Ziel eines jeden Menschen sein!

  • @shantak1277
    @shantak1277 4 місяці тому

    When one sees that thought itself is limited and thus cannot help solve its own conflicts, what next? Most likely when we truly realize this, all thoughts suddenly comes to a stop. Then in this silence, awareness rises and has a chance to bring about order in our lives.

    • @SaithMasu12
      @SaithMasu12 4 місяці тому

      In my experience thoughts go on. They sometimes can be silenced, but they will reappear. There is nothing one can do about it.
      Silence is in detachment of them. In other words: they go on automatically without any doership.

  • @4allritesh
    @4allritesh Місяць тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @nikitasenthilkumar6477
    @nikitasenthilkumar6477 Рік тому

    Understood 🙏

  • @agnwstospais7553
    @agnwstospais7553 Рік тому

    It's all in his initial phrases. When i say "you" I make the assumption that I am separate entity from this "you" and this you is as antagonistic as "i am"

  • @takhetare6854
    @takhetare6854 Місяць тому

    yes viewer is trying to understand it

  • @Fonteseca1
    @Fonteseca1 6 місяців тому

    I will "refrain" my ego... Tomorrow I go back to work...Oh, I'm not handling this... I find I have to push for me to handle this... Oh no, Im trying to control things again. Maybe I shall just stop working or change my attitude in it, not trying to control things...

  • @nataliav6768
    @nataliav6768 Рік тому

    Yes, Sir

  • @sarinalesage6638
    @sarinalesage6638 Рік тому

    The other instrument we can use is watching in complete Silence Force, and only interfering with what we se e happening if we can feel that our intterfering is completely correct and helpfull for the situation we observe.....

  • @robduijf2752
    @robduijf2752 Рік тому +1

    There is another instrument, which is the brain itself, having the complete capacity to be aware, when that capacity is not absorbed by any limited, egocentric thinking.
    Thought, however limited, is necessary for practicle reasons to function as human beings - but only then! - whereas divisive egocentric thinking limits our holistic functioning.

    • @KINGJUNAID555
      @KINGJUNAID555 Рік тому

      Yes thought is necessary in the physical world but it is not necessary in the psychological world.

    • @carniamellato4021
      @carniamellato4021 Рік тому

      Forse. La valanga di psicologi e psicoterapeuti in azione sul pianeta fondano il loro corretto agire su questo postulato 'olistico' sono avanti sì, ma c'è di meglio. Considerare l'altro come noi stessi, amarlo senza giudicare, e non avrà bisogno di leccarsi le ferite.

  • @eribertodagatan6876
    @eribertodagatan6876 Рік тому +1

    Awareness see emotion and thinking processes. Awareness is the transcendental consciousness. Higher or deeper thinking or feeling.
    If you are tremendously aware that is the fullness of life that jesus christ want us to have. It is the kingdom of God that is within each one of us.

  • @amruthbhuyar7803
    @amruthbhuyar7803 Рік тому

    Nice

  • @gentiantafa4619
    @gentiantafa4619 Рік тому

    🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @robertopuccianti8498
    @robertopuccianti8498 Рік тому

    🧡💥🙏

  • @HarshaniUthpala-h3e
    @HarshaniUthpala-h3e Рік тому

    I guess there might be shame which I can't enjoy. We make reasons to not to feel that but wound continuously pulling us to the fact. When it pulling us we make more powerful imaginations to by changing the essence of facts.
    I cant think more.

  • @user-gq6sf4si6j
    @user-gq6sf4si6j Рік тому

    Every comment is a thought.. ☺🤫

  • @mirian593
    @mirian593 Рік тому +1

    Can you observe without the thought coming into the observation? I dont think he really explained that, at list not in this short video.😢

  • @chiptowers1
    @chiptowers1 Рік тому

    If the ego is, quote; " being created by thought" " thought which is limited", then from where did that ego enter thought for thought to suddenly think of ego. quote; " what is it" the ego.
    The ego is the tool that the form uses to reveal its presence to the brain.
    Because the form is not a concept, then that that is received into the brain by thought via the ego tool should be considered as form, physical form, because the form that formed the intelligent species initially can only be of a physical form whether you know how that physical form formed initially or not.
    It is not, ego, quote; "the product of thought" because thought cannot form a physical form, thought only uses a physical form tools within that physical form.
    Why is thought there, to attain knowledge, imprinted knowledge from the physical source that formed the intelligence species.
    We have come a long way of understanding since Krishnamurti who actually has missed the boat.

  • @piehound
    @piehound Рік тому

    Mr. Krishnamurti is investigating the subject of conflict and what part the ego plays. I wonder if the bible addresses the same question with this verse in Proverbs. *WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT THERE IS PRIDE.* If so . . . then " pride " and " ego " as defined by Mr. K are the same. No ????

  • @dannycassinellibarac9993
    @dannycassinellibarac9993 Рік тому

    Then you know!

  • @stevenmehl721
    @stevenmehl721 Рік тому

    Whatever Krishna G, just don’t Lego my Ego 😂

  • @rayitojazz
    @rayitojazz Рік тому

    Please spanish subtitulos🙏🙏🙏

  • @RicklessSanchez
    @RicklessSanchez 8 місяців тому

    If Tucson Az people keep talking about ego they're already becoming two-face then overconfident.

  • @Otto-mq8lg
    @Otto-mq8lg 5 місяців тому

    I am is because of awareness, I was is do to a thought, and I will is having intuition..

  • @azloii9781
    @azloii9781 5 місяців тому

    I really gotta leggo my eggo

  • @robinaguenkel7534
    @robinaguenkel7534 Рік тому

    👍🇩🇪

  • @binodroka1
    @binodroka1 Рік тому

    🪔👏🧘‍♂️

  • @camilotics
    @camilotics Рік тому

    I admire Jido but i have to Say that wondering if we understand every single Word sounds from ego.

  • @scottlandyard4264
    @scottlandyard4264 Рік тому

    Lego your ego😏

  • @laughingbat1695
    @laughingbat1695 7 місяців тому

    i dont get it

  • @bikerjon8934
    @bikerjon8934 8 місяців тому

    is he talking about waffles?