Edmontosaurus vs T. rex paleoart part 1: Reconstructing Tyrannosaurus
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 кві 2023
- I was sick when I recorded this…
Part 2 will be Edmontosaurus, part 3 will be the environment and other animals and part 4 will be the final artwork.
Mark Witton’s blog: markwitton-com.blogspot.com/20...
Sources:
Scott Hartman's Skeletal Blog: www.skeletaldrawing.com/
Variation in T. rex: www.researchgate.net/profile/...
Scotty's description ( Couldn't find Stan's): anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wil...
Locomotion: peerj.com/articles/3420/
Jaw Musculature: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/f...
Neck Musculature: academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/a...
Forearm musculature: www.researchgate.net/profile/...
Pelvic and Hindlimb Musculature: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/p...
Tail Musculature: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/p...
Lips: www.science.org/doi/full/10.1...
Facial Integument: link.springer.com/content/pdf...
Scale Impressions/ phylogenetic integument trends: www.researchgate.net/publicat...
Color: markwitton-com.blogspot.com/20...
Music used:
Survival of the cynodonts - Benjamin Bartlett
Canyon of Terror - Benjamin Bartlett
Apatosaurus - Christopher Franke
Geographer - After All
Cruel Sea - Benjamin Bartlett
Giant of the Skies - Benjamin Bartlett
Dude you are so talented, i really wish i could become as good as you when it comes to art, researching and overall paleontology knowledge, keep it up king
Stan proceeds to get bullied by large Edmontosaurus.
Stan proceeds to call over Scotty.
Edmontosaurus proceeds to back away.
Scotty proceeds to eat Stan.
What happened to dream work makes the team work
Betrayal.
i could spend hours just listening to you talk about dinosaurs
they're so fascinating, and your art is gorgeous! i'm so excited for part 2 :)
“I will not draw feathers”
Proceeds to draw feathers
Yeah, but those are not feathers. Feathers are a lot complicated, so they are primarily found in birds, overaptor, and dromeosaurs.
Other furrie stuff found in dinosaurs are less complicated then feathers so they just filaments
They look like quills that you would see in other theropod and other ornithischian.
Feathers can't coexist on top of scales as feathers is a form of scale and what would be underneath would be skin.
So yes the dinosaur he drew is 100% scaly, and filaments is just a optional thing to draw.
@@ultranecromos9915 They are probably stage 1 feathers, that are just single hair-like filaments. Also I am pretty sure feathers and scales can coexist, with the feathers in-between the scales. You seem to be mistaken.
@user-H_m feathers are a complex structure of scales, you can't have them on top of scales, and what's under feathers would be bear skin. It isn't possible for an animal to have two of the same filaments on top of eachother. It wouldn't work.
@@ultranecromos9915 Well, I... am not sure. I will say though, I've heard some scientists hypothesized that Tyrannosaurs' skin impressions were actually just rough skin, that could have some feathers in it. Like on some modern birds' faces and legs!
@user-H_m Even if that was the case, we, the skin impressions from tyrannosaurids have been too consistent like pebble shaped to be considered bear skin. I mean up to your interpretation of those findings.
It’s incredible on how much research you do before drawing
This is where the fun begins
If someone doesn’t get this reference can I kill said someone?
But the shields are still up!
I dont get it
@@boomerwinner 🫤
It would be really cool for you to draw a large Hell creek formation diorama in the future or maybe some other formation with the environment and everything
This is actually so cool. Great insight into both the research and the process of creating an artwork like this. And of course, I love today's result as well. You have a way with colours that I'll probably stay jealous of forever.
In any case, great video, sub given :p
CORRECTIONS: Stan is being located to a museum in the UAE. T. rex may have had scutes since concavenator had them. I drew the arms a bit too small. The artwork at 0:43 is by Christopher Snrka.
This is a certified correction classic
Actually there is evidence for bird like scutes on the feet of theropod, primarily from the genus Concavenator.
Bloody Mary, a young tyrannosaurid at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Science has bird-like scutes preserved on its foot. Literally no reason to suggest that they were absent in theropods.
@@michaeldeak5727 I addressed that in another video and the pinned comment. However I wasn’t aware of Bloody Mary so thanks for the info.
What a coincidence, itchy is actually my second favourite spinosaurid after spino we all know. You’re my another favourite paleo channel ;) Amazing research and art. Subbed.
I love your art. I like drawing to I hope some day I could show you
bro you're talented you're better than most paleo artist and you know alot of stuff about dinosaurs keep up the art you're amazing
13:35 bro I feel you there.
This video was absolutely amazing and I love your art a lot
I wish you have a great day
Fire
The amount of extensive research you put into this artwork is phenomenal! I usually just use a skeletal reconstruction along with a few other pieces of inspiration (living archosaurs)
The Tyrannosaurus rex turned out amazing, I can’t wait for the next part!
This is such good content please keep making more videos like this
6:27 wasn't concavenator discovered to have similar foot scutes to birds?
From what I’ve just looked at, the scales weren’t actual scutes. They did look similar but were under the foot and not on top of the toes
Dang! Great vid bro, going in to the research is hella entertaining, it also gives a great insight to people who just start their art journey. I cought a few things though, tarsal scutes are indeed present on tyrannosaurs! Tyrannosaurid from Montana dueling dinosaurs has them preserved. Another thing is teeth slippage, in tyrannosaurs it isn't really a thing, their teeth are so tightly packed in the sockets, with new teeth inserting right in to the grooves in the root of the previous tooth. Lighter part of the chompers where enamel ends might suggest some intense gum line. To conclude, keep up the good work bro cuz it fine af!
Beautiful art and great background music
thank you, you gave me some insights.
what interests me is the lack of scutes! is there a specific paper describing that?
also holy hell dude your art is amazing! you’re super talented
It's not known if other dinosaurs had scutes or not. It depends on when they evolved. It is possible they evolved early on, but it's also been suggested that the scutes might have evolved from wing feathers on the leg, which is something only maniraptorans had. To be honest, it would explain a long standing question of mine. That is, why were leg wings so common in flying dinosaurs, yet totally absent in birds? It would make sense, if they converted their second pair of wings into scutes.
But the truth is we really don't know. It's up to the artist to decide what makes sense.
EDIT: Apparently concavenator did have scutes, both on the feet and tail, but it's unknown if it evolved from a common ancestor between it and birds, or if it's convergent evolution. Interestingly it also has extremely controversial knobs on its arms that many believe to be quill knobs, and many do not. Which is odd because pennaceous feathers are so complex they're unlikely to evolve twice, so if they are quill knobs, pennaceous feathers either evolved a lot earlier than we thought, or concavenator beat the odds and independently evolved a similar feature to birds. Given that one of the hypotheses for scute evolution is that they evolved from wing feathers on the legs, the scutes on concavenator are potential evidence that it may actually have quills.
@@catpoke9557 thank you! that's super interesting, I'll have to find the papers about conc then. concavenator is so damn weird lol
so basically maniraptorans did have leg feathers, but those eventually became scutes in aves? hence why larger theropods wouldn't have them since they had no feathers in the first place
however, conc does kind of throw a wrench into hat since it. did have scutes! and it was a (basal) carcharadontosaurid. hmm
@@gordonfreemee3660 Yup! Concavenator throws a wrench into the hypothesis that avian scutes evolved from their leg's wing feathers. But then again, like you said... Concavenator was WEIRD. It is possible it evolved the scutes totally separately.
For now, though, I just stick with the assumption that scutes evolved from more basal feathers than we think.
I really like the colors you used, doesnt look out of place like so many paleoart , i can see a rex being that color.
This video really helps me with tyrannosaur head design. I am only real good at dromaeosaurs, spinosaurs, pachycephalosaurs and pterosaurs.
"YOU MANIAC ROCK!
YOU BOUGHT STAN!
DARN YOU!
DARN YOU ALL TO HECK!"
2:27
wait was the rock actually the private collector 😭😭
Last I checked yeah
💀💀💀
The rock has a rock 💀💀💀
I feel like if it had to go to a private collector at least it went to one that people know and like
It just sucks that the public can't see the beauty of Stan in person with the actual bones not a cast
Nooooooo.......
you actually added some feathers.
I love this art what kind of pencil do you use?
just saying stan's coming up in an upcoming museum called Abu Dhabi Natural History Museum in 2025 or something. the secret buyers was the museum wanting him as a display
Next hadrosaur after edmontasaurus is para plz
Let's just put this dude on a paleo-podcast.
3:05 Steven did a synapisode re-looking at Dilophosaurus and saw they had lips.
My favourite synapisode
@@ichthyovenator3351One of mine as well. He still hasn't done one for Spinosaurus.
Plus, Can you give me some tips on how you blend your art so realistically, I'm a paleo-artist as well.
Its funny how he said he would add no feathers,but draw them anyway
Those aren't feathers, they're quills
@@flugelchannel237 quills on theropods are feathers
So, I accidentally found out while replying to another comment that concavenator has scutes on its feet. Since both birds and concavenator have them, I think it would make most sense to assume T. rex had them, especially since the reasoning against them was that they evolved from feathers. It is clear that either they are feathers from an earlier ancestor than we usually think, or that they can and are easily evolved to the point it happened at least twice.
Of course it's not a necessary artistic choice, just one I think sounds a bit more logical. When we don't have physical evidence of how an animal looked, we look to its relatives. The two theropods we have skin impressions of in that specific area have scutes, so scutes have good odds of being on other theropods too.
Stan was actualy the fossil that the jurassic park rex was based on
Feathers on more derived Tyrannosauroids are plausible, but there is no direct evidence that they had them.temperature than mammalian fur, birds don't have much trouble regulating temperature, so birds don't change their feather coat much with varying temperatures, the Yutyrannus in an environment that was A degree colder than the T-rex, being a temperate environment, where there were many warm zone animals, it is not impossible then that Tyrannosaurus had a very large coat of feathers on the body.opro like some Paleoarts show. His skin marks could then be from regions without feathers, either because it didn't grow there, or he lost his feathers during an accident, they fell out or were pulled out by another animal, or there were waves covering that skin, and it did not preserve it, it is common in some geological formations where the rex is found, there are animals that should have a coating, such as birds and pewue small mammals, but without the fur or feather marks, just skin, this happens in other formations as well. Tyrannosaurus scales may be vestiges of what were once complete scales, since apparently they weren't functional, looking more like the skin of a bird when it's not feathered, or a lizard without scales, then either those rex skin marks weren't scales,or they were non-functional scales.
Interesting video. One correction on image attribution, though; the scene of the Tyrannosaurs (included the Jane-aged aggressor going after the young Edmontosaurus at around 0:43 is my work, not Simonmoberg.
Thanks for letting me know
DrawvT-Rex's arms with those smol pencils,
Now that sad. 13:34
10/10 Rex very chunky
I genuinely had to explain to someone, using horses as an example, that just because many hadrosaurs didn't have- as this person put it- 'weapons,' doesn't mean they were defenseless. They still insisted, even with my examples, that hadrosaurs were purely sprinters... Despite the fact that edmontosaurus would have zero reason to become so massive if its main defense was sprinting... All it'd achieve is making it both slower AND more appealing to T. rex! It would be like representing hippos as sprinters because they don't have horns
I'm sure inexperienced Rexes trying to hunt must have been hurt or killed quite often (live fast/die young), but also if they're teens and they're trying to 'impress' a female, they would probably do all kinds of potentially lethal things.
Could've used Dan Folkes, or that one musculature diagram of T-rex made in 2020
omg it's here
Im surprised you’re still awake
@@ichthyovenator3351 ichthyovenator uploads are more important than sleep
Lmaoo
❤❤❤❤
Positive comment
Hey cheeky you said you wouldn’t add elephant feathers
T-Rex: Ohh where is my prescription glasses.
*glasses on the floor
T-Rex: *reaches for it but can’t get it
T-Rex is Big Sad :(
Actually Stan was bought by a museum in Abu Dhabi.
Oh thanks for letting me know
Actually, the lip debate is still going on and sooner or later Tracy lee ford will make another paper
Unless there’s some radical evidence rejecting the current discussion then the lip debate is settled for the time being.
@@ichthyovenator3351 we will find out soon in the future
Also im still waiting of edmontosaurus
nice😸
I'm Still sad they sold Stan
I have a question ! Could u link me some of the supplies you use for ur master pieces ??? I‘d be amaazzingngngnn !!!!
Wow so cute little chubby T-rex ahaha
Niceeee
Good drawing but I have a few nit picks. The legs seem too thin to me, the arms are too small and the lips too large. Since reptiles don't have face muscles that means that dinosaurs too wouldn't be able to move those lips. So if they were that big they'd get in the way if the animal bit down.
The arms are too small, however I based the larger lips on Mark Witton’s reconstruction he used for the new lip paper with the loose lepidosaur like lips. Also I do know that the lips would’ve been immovable.
Andy progressiv on part 2.
I think T.rex would've been an olive green color since it lived an environment similar to Florida and Louisiana.
Stan is 11.78 meters
Is it possible varanids have that much gum tissue because their teeth aren’t rooted (unlike theropods)?
What brand are your coulour pencils?
Prismacolor premier
@@ichthyovenator3351 ok
T. rex sure was a Big Chungus.
What's the list of music you use in this video?
It’s in the description now
Hey there. I've seen your art lately and I can't deny it looks marvelous. I would like to talk to you in private, but found no way to send any direct messages, so i guess an UA-cam comment will have to do. If you agree, may we talk about your arts?
I hope you're able to see this comment and i appreciate the attention in advance
Have U watched prehistoric Planet 🕑 trailer ???
Gud. Now draw the rex being happy
15:23 where is its teeth It looks like it still has the monitor lizard like gums or whatever that you just said you said that you were not gonna put lizard like gums
rip pencils
wow so early
3:20 Not if you go to bear gulch.
Speaking of which can we get some kind of Triassic or Paleozoic drawing?
Collab?
Isn't the mouth too short compared to the skeleton ?
Yes, yes it is…
Your videos are fun, but your music is WAY too loud dude. There are times when I can't hear what you're saying at all
🫀🦖🫀
You realize that there is only one Tyrannosaurus and that is Rex even Dr. Thomas car even made a paper about it so yeah the paper is fake that Greg Paul said
I did say that, I said there was a possibility of another species turning up but we don’t have the evidence for that. It’s unlikely Tyrannosaurus was a monotypic genus while being the only large tyrannosaur on the continent for so long. But again there’s no evidence and that was purely my opinion.
Real T. rex is C H O N K
You forgot to draw the teeth lmao
I didn’t forget. I used a magical technique called laziness
Second
You’re not second mr
@@JosephsJungle8 do it to confuse people I did it on a vid upladed last year
Eyes are too big, arms are too skinny, seems to be no teeth, head is the wrong shape, and i dont even know what's going on with the way he's positioned, man.
The arms are too short. If an adult t.rex skull is about 5 feet long, and the arms about 3 feet long, then the arms are about 2/3 the length of the skull. No matter what the age is. Your drawing, the arms are less than half the skull length.
I fixed most of the problems with this in another video, including lengthening the arms. Also where did you get the arm to skull ratio? Just curious
@@ichthyovenator3351 Read about Trex in books and Wikipedia, which all give descriptions on the skeletal structure of the animal. All talk about a full adult having a skull 5 feet long and when discussing the arms, they were 3 foot, 2 finger arms. So, skull 5 feet, arms 3 feet in length.
The defenseless hadrosaur art needs to stop. Most hadrosaurs were pretty large could and would attack a rex on sight.
Shan’t wasn’t even that big aswell he overrated that like mad
Why is the T Rex wearing a blonde wig???
This video was absolutely amazing and I love your art a lot
I wish you have a great day