Great to see this rare documentary here on You Tube. Something about these old documentaries makes everything seem more credible, certainly different from our reality TV today.
Then again paranormal is a bit difficult to decipher, since it's speculative and something that's not easily tested, unless it's the reliability of the witness. But there are some documentaries about paranormal stuff that do take a different and interesting direction: ua-cam.com/video/CXMRkxGWrbg/v-deo.html That and we know that's it difficult to convince people since most people don't like being talked down to or being called a liar or crazy. Heck that mentality even goes for several pieces of science that gets overlooked due to fear of reputations being ruined and getting constant harassment from nay-sayers. This is coming from me who's a bit argumentative on stuff like this. Sure, it could be wishful thinking, but it's true that we have to be careful on how we deliver. ua-cam.com/video/u9qs0R7v7CA/v-deo.html
8:59- 13:02 Sure, he may think that footage may be of someone pranking on Patterson, and Gimlin, but unlike other examples like the Ape Canyon incident, the footprints that gave this creature it's famous name; this footage is still as of mow up for debate since there's no clear solid conclusion of it from many different experts. Plus, it didn't help that Gimlin nowadays is reluctant to talk about due to the harassment he got from both believers and skeptics.
@@Cool2BCeltic Well like I said, it hasn't been definitively proven as a hoax, like the other 2 that have been mentioned. Plus, you know how some say that well the fur patterns that look like seams aren't too dissimilar to actual apes, besides Gorillas do have those seem like patterns because of the skin and muscle under the fur. You know how some say if this was a costume, it would've been pretty ahead of its time since ape suits during the 1960s had a cheesy quality. There was like muscle build up and folds in the skin, like with a real animal. But then again, I sometimes feel that skeptics don't acknowledge is that confirmation bias can go the other way around with their assumptions. But then again stuff like this is a bit difficult to handle because we know that people don't like being talked down to and treated as liars/stupid for believing in things like this.
A lot of Bigfoot sightings have actually been of North American black bears. Many people think bears go about on all fours and generally they do, but they can walk on their hind legs as upright as a human being.
Bigfoot and the yeti are not the only humanoid ape cryptids in the world. Here's a list of well-known ones: Florida, U.S.A.: Skunk ape Arkansas, U.S.A.: Fouke Monster Ohio, U.S.A.: Ohio Grassman Japan: Hibagon Australia: Yowie Russia: Almas Sumatra, Indonesia: Orang Pendek New Zealand: Moehau/Maero China: Yeren
Great to see this rare documentary here on You Tube. Something about these old documentaries makes everything seem more credible, certainly different from our reality TV today.
Then again paranormal is a bit difficult to decipher, since it's speculative and something that's not easily tested, unless it's the reliability of the witness. But there are some documentaries about paranormal stuff that do take a different and interesting direction:
ua-cam.com/video/CXMRkxGWrbg/v-deo.html
That and we know that's it difficult to convince people since most people don't like being talked down to or being called a liar or crazy. Heck that mentality even goes for several pieces of science that gets overlooked due to fear of reputations being ruined and getting constant harassment from nay-sayers. This is coming from me who's a bit argumentative on stuff like this. Sure, it could be wishful thinking, but it's true that we have to be careful on how we deliver.
ua-cam.com/video/u9qs0R7v7CA/v-deo.html
I am 100% ready to hear Attenborough talk about the yeti
Would also like to hear him talk about the Orang Pendek
Wow, this genuinely looks incredible. They really don't make them like they used to
8:59- 13:02
Sure, he may think that footage may be of someone pranking on Patterson, and Gimlin, but unlike other examples like the Ape Canyon incident, the footprints that gave this creature it's famous name; this footage is still as of mow up for debate since there's no clear solid conclusion of it from many different experts. Plus, it didn't help that Gimlin nowadays is reluctant to talk about due to the harassment he got from both believers and skeptics.
I personally think the Patterson film is a hoax. Actually watching the film you can see seams in the fur that the actor is wearing.
@@Cool2BCeltic Well like I said, it hasn't been definitively proven as a hoax, like the other 2 that have been mentioned. Plus, you know how some say that well the fur patterns that look like seams aren't too dissimilar to actual apes, besides Gorillas do have those seem like patterns because of the skin and muscle under the fur. You know how some say if this was a costume, it would've been pretty ahead of its time since ape suits during the 1960s had a cheesy quality. There was like muscle build up and folds in the skin, like with a real animal. But then again, I sometimes feel that skeptics don't acknowledge is that confirmation bias can go the other way around with their assumptions. But then again stuff like this is a bit difficult to handle because we know that people don't like being talked down to and treated as liars/stupid for believing in things like this.
A lot of Bigfoot sightings have actually been of North American black bears. Many people think bears go about on all fours and generally they do, but they can walk on their hind legs as upright as a human being.
❤️ 💙
Bigfoot and the yeti are not the only humanoid ape cryptids in the world. Here's a list of well-known ones:
Florida, U.S.A.: Skunk ape
Arkansas, U.S.A.: Fouke Monster
Ohio, U.S.A.: Ohio Grassman
Japan: Hibagon
Australia: Yowie
Russia: Almas
Sumatra, Indonesia: Orang Pendek
New Zealand: Moehau/Maero
China: Yeren