Heatherwick's Rolling Bridge

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
  • The Rolling Bridge was designed by the award-winning Heatherwick Studio, working with structural engineers SKM Anthony Hunts.
    Installed in August 2004, the Rolling Bridge spans an inlet of the Grand Union Canal, towards the head of Paddington Basin.
    The Rolling Bridge at first appears inconspicuous; a simple steel and timber footbridge. To allow access for a boat to be moored in its inlet however, it slowly curls up until its two ends meet, forming an octagonal sculpture that stands on one side of the canal towpath.
    The twelve metre bridge is made from eight triangular segments, which fold towards each other. The master unit hidden underground powers hydraulic rams within the bridge parapets, which fold the handrail. This is what enables the bridge to curl.
    The Rolling Bridge was constructed at Littlehampton Welding in Sussex, and arrived at Paddington by canal. Since its official opening in September 2004 it has won a Structural Steel Award and an Emerging Architecture Award.
    Every Wednesday and Friday at midday, and on Saturdays at 2pm, the team at Merchant Square delight visitors and people who live and work in Paddington by demonstrating the Rolling Bridge in action.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 520

  • @thesun4003
    @thesun4003 3 роки тому +1155

    Wow they made civil engineers bridge into a real thing!

    • @edenalon5435
      @edenalon5435 3 роки тому +13

      i think you were saying that RCE recreated the rolling bridge in poly bridge

    • @thesun4003
      @thesun4003 3 роки тому +72

      Wooosh

    • @TwinShards
      @TwinShards 3 роки тому +28

      @@thesun4003 ↑ Eden can't read sarcasm it look like.

    • @Damian-cilr2
      @Damian-cilr2 3 роки тому +7

      @@edenalon5435 it looks like you cant see through sarcam

    • @comit8077
      @comit8077 3 роки тому +1

      @@edenalon5435 because he did dumbass

  • @CantcerCause
    @CantcerCause 3 роки тому +478

    its basically an art piece, it doesnt have to serve a purpose, it just sits/curls there and looks nice

    • @Elinzar
      @Elinzar 3 роки тому +12

      yeah it may be basically useless, but is cool

    • @blueheartorangeheart3768
      @blueheartorangeheart3768 3 роки тому +19

      It’s purposes is to get people to say that’s near and visit the city

    • @elfedowen6452
      @elfedowen6452 3 роки тому +5

      You've just described me doing yoga.

    • @4thArmoredVet
      @4thArmoredVet 3 роки тому +1

      I agree. It’s just art.

    • @re7416
      @re7416 3 роки тому +3

      @@Elinzar Yup! Bridges are useless b/c everyone knows that humans can walk on water 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @mrgummygod
    @mrgummygod 3 роки тому +206

    Polybrige got some crazy graphics these days

  • @n111254789
    @n111254789 3 роки тому +206

    I'm an american here, just saw this from Civil Engineers polybridge video and had to search it up. It is such a shame some people in the comments are getting angry about this. This was privately funded, you don't have to wait for it to unfold you can literally walk right around it. The entire purpose of this bridge is to have a mechanism that is beautiful as an art piece as well as advertisement for the people who made it and the people who own the building.
    Especially to us that love engineering the time and thought that went into designing this and then fabricating it and making it look this beautiful is seriously a feat of engineering.
    They could throw down two planks and call it good but they made art instead. Sure beats the hell out of a cheap sign in terms of advertising for their business.

    • @NGC1433
      @NGC1433 3 роки тому +1

      That's waste engineering. Overcomplicating to this degree where as you say, two planks could be used, well I'd steer way clear away from that company. Unless I'm in business of accidentally funding space programs when I need a kettle.

    • @crazy808ish
      @crazy808ish 3 роки тому +13

      @@NGC1433 You seem to be missing the "art" concept of this. The point was never to have a simple design in the first place. I'll bet whoever funded this project would be very disappointed if they wanted an artistic bridge design and you gave them two planks of wood instead.

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 3 роки тому +17

      @@NGC1433 Yeah brother, it had nothing to do with simplicity it was meant to be art. Like a circular smiley face drawn in 4 seconds vs the Mona Lisa both depict a person with a facial expression but only one of them is art. It's in the details. This is engineering art, the details are what make it beautiful.
      There is a reason that mechanical watches are loved for their complications. We could just use a 4 dollar Casio quartz watch and it would be more accurate but some people enjoy the complexities of engineering and find artistic value in it.
      Is this a practical bridge? No, it wasn't meant to be you can walk directly around it. It was meant to show they can make something this beautiful out of something as mundane as a small bridge. That is serious creativity.
      Simplicity is purity in engineering when designing something robust. The best part in a design is one that reduces the number of other required parts. But this isn't just engineering. This isn't going on a Le Man's car, or an airplane, or a rocket. It's not meant to save lives or carry cars everyday it is a functional art sculpture intended to show off their abilities. Idk how else to describe the difference, it's a shame you can't appreciate it though.

  • @lebrondajames1019
    @lebrondajames1019 3 роки тому +2255

    Real civil engineer brought me here

  • @yordanovarts.3442
    @yordanovarts.3442 3 роки тому +223

    I've walked over that bridge ptobbably a 100 times and never knew it actually moves :D

    • @GuyMahoney
      @GuyMahoney 3 роки тому +34

      Probably because rolling it up is such a monumentally collosal waste of time.

    • @elliotmorin5560
      @elliotmorin5560 3 роки тому +9

      @@GuyMahoney If it never rolls up, then its just an absurd waste of money that serves no purpose but to allow an engineer to show off.

    • @GuyMahoney
      @GuyMahoney 3 роки тому +5

      @@elliotmorin5560 Exactly. Companies love to waste money on their building's aesthetics.

    • @elliotmorin5560
      @elliotmorin5560 3 роки тому +6

      @@AnonymousB0ss The debate has nothing to do with being anti-technology. Its about being against needlessly wasteful concepts. How exactly is that bridge better then just a standard bridge? What possible advantage is there to rolling it up?

    • @GuyMahoney
      @GuyMahoney 3 роки тому +3

      @@AnonymousB0ss We'd use functional bridges, not snail bridges that don't benefit anybody or cable bridges that weren't properly designed (millenium bridge)
      Engineering > Architecture

  • @juangonzalez9848
    @juangonzalez9848 3 роки тому +259

    It’s neat and all, but that canal dead ends right their, you can even see people walking around. If this was a 600 foot long slip then maybe I could see it offering convenience but it seems more like a “because we can” thing rather then an innovative solution to a problem.

    • @LinnyGFX
      @LinnyGFX 3 роки тому +23

      its called art baby

    • @ChrisJones-qw7bn
      @ChrisJones-qw7bn 3 роки тому +9

      Proof of concept if nothing else....

    • @comit8077
      @comit8077 3 роки тому +8

      @@baums547 before *rolling out* the product... ITS A JOKE

    • @halfbee7886
      @halfbee7886 3 роки тому +15

      Well, what's wrong with "because we can" mindset? We wouldn't have achieved technological advancement like we have right now, if people from the past never tried things out just because they could. It's okay to be curious and creative.

    • @lindak8664
      @lindak8664 3 роки тому +5

      And sometimes ’because we can’ is the absolute best reason to do something! 😁

  • @ThomasBomb45
    @ThomasBomb45 3 роки тому +232

    Anyone else feel an insane urge to stand on that one piece that doesn't move and be completely surrounded by bridge?

    • @MrIgottap
      @MrIgottap 3 роки тому +4

      Yes, I do too!

    • @samuelfellows6923
      @samuelfellows6923 3 роки тому +1

      And be trapped inside it until it next unfurls - and how long would that be? 🙄

    • @Godisbest4you
      @Godisbest4you 3 роки тому +15

      @@samuelfellows6923 you only have to wait like 15 seconds. you don’t wait until it is completely normal again 🙄

    • @blurbYT
      @blurbYT 2 роки тому

      Yes

    • @Drummerhoost
      @Drummerhoost 2 роки тому +2

      @@samuelfellows6923 you’re definitely fun at parties

  • @vlnow
    @vlnow 8 років тому +79

    What i really like about the design of this bridge is that if you didn't know about it , you could easily just walk over it and not even notice there was anything special about it.

  • @EclipsaMyrtenaster
    @EclipsaMyrtenaster 3 роки тому +45

    Who turned on Unbreakable to build this bridge??

  • @lemuelaarongonzales1266
    @lemuelaarongonzales1266 5 років тому +10

    Soooo many negative comments about this bridge. I almost can’t believe it. Can’t we just appreciate the innovative thinking of Thomas Heatherwick and creating something that’s one of a kind.

    • @atharvakashiva1467
      @atharvakashiva1467 4 роки тому +1

      there's no point of innovation if the end result is unnecessary

    • @Artemis0713
      @Artemis0713 3 роки тому +2

      @@atharvakashiva1467 ever heard of Art?

  • @gatlinservis5960
    @gatlinservis5960 3 роки тому +84

    I can only imagine some one on the end of the bridge not moving when it’s closing and they get trapped in a rolled up bridge

    • @comit8077
      @comit8077 3 роки тому +3

      That was the only think I could think about

    • @willpackham4575
      @willpackham4575 3 роки тому +6

      Stuck in a giant hamster wheel

    • @saketkumar6697
      @saketkumar6697 3 роки тому +1

      It won't roll if there is human in bridge..

    • @arthurwagar6224
      @arthurwagar6224 3 роки тому +1

      Foolish of them. Wat.

    • @bow1380
      @bow1380 3 роки тому

      human taco.

  • @thomas_testing
    @thomas_testing 4 роки тому +30

    This bridge has loads of potential as a skate ramp

  • @smudgemouse
    @smudgemouse 8 років тому +43

    For those glass half empty joyless people who criticize this as not very useful and can't see the purpose of it - the purpose is inspiration, sculpture, art with function, and stunning, innovative design. It is and always will be a fantastic talking point for locals and tourists alike. Having seen it working, it's an utter delight and brings smiles to the faces of people of ALL ages. Great art does not have to be useful - this piece IS, but that's just a bonus.

    • @thegeneralissimo470
      @thegeneralissimo470 8 років тому +6

      +smudgemouse And yet the UK is nearly 1.6 trillion pounds in debt.

    • @anniebygrave9300
      @anniebygrave9300 8 років тому +12

      +The Generalissimo
      IMHO the national debt of a country is irrelevant to this posting. The bridge was funded by the private development company Paddington Basin Developments Ltd, it was not funded by public money.
      Even if it had been funded by UK taxes, why should any person in the UK stop appreciating beauty just because a succession of UK Governments has mismanaged their county's economy? If that ever happened to me, I'd probably be better off dead.

    • @pentachronic
      @pentachronic 7 років тому

      Great art does not have to be useful. However if there is too much great art we end up with no natural spaces left. Personally I believe the greatest art of all time is the natural environment. Use it wisely or there will be none left !!!

    • @oldpossum
      @oldpossum 6 років тому +8

      This was a PRIVATELY FUNDED PIECE OF ART.
      Brilliant, clever and FUNNY as hell.
      ok?

  • @Xeogin
    @Xeogin 3 роки тому +12

    At that miserably slow speed, how do you expect that to catch anyone?

  • @halfbee7886
    @halfbee7886 3 роки тому +3

    I'd like to one day film myself standing next to that bridge while it's curling down, and I'll yell "COME ON, YOU CAN DO IT! BELIEVE IN YOURSELF! REMEMBER YOUR TRAINING! NO ONE STANDS IN YOUR WAY!" as if I'm coaching it.

  • @alanmorris7669
    @alanmorris7669 4 роки тому +8

    This bridge was designed by Thomas A. Heatherwick. I love it!

  • @rachaelstansfield3594
    @rachaelstansfield3594 9 років тому +8

    That is a thing of beauty!

  • @phoenyan2087
    @phoenyan2087 3 роки тому +45

    In a Little of time this video will be filled with comments regarding real civil engineer

  • @smeenasiddiqui2374
    @smeenasiddiqui2374 4 роки тому

    At 1st I though it was a thrill ride. Then a bridge across...mind blowing. Interesting and beautifuly made.🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈

  • @arthurwagar6224
    @arthurwagar6224 3 роки тому +1

    Love the way the hydraulic system is hidden.

  • @wasimawan3916
    @wasimawan3916 3 роки тому

    Wow amazing sharing

  • @johnrouvalis9417
    @johnrouvalis9417 Рік тому

    Magnificent idea for a bridge, however the duck’s walking on water is a miracle and much more efficient!

  • @antonellaandrea8489
    @antonellaandrea8489 4 роки тому +31

    What happens If the brigde starts raising when someone is passing by?

  • @CherryBerry48
    @CherryBerry48 9 років тому +5

    wow that was so cool and very awesome!!

  • @encomunismo
    @encomunismo 3 роки тому

    ... and so extraordinarily well filmed!

  • @pypeapple
    @pypeapple 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks RCE

  • @frespe8230
    @frespe8230 3 роки тому

    It's a cool bridge, that for sure. According to Wikipedia the bridge is 39 ft (12 metre) long and 1,4 meters wide. It cost £500,000 to build. That's £12,820 per foot or £1068 per inch. Or in metrics, £41,666/m, £416/cm, £41,6/mm. Or if you prefer, 1m³ ≈ £29,762, 1dm³ ≈ £298, 1cm³ ≈ £2,98. The Rolling Bridge was built in 2004, so adjust the price with inflation, and it would've cost roughly £772,000 to build the bridge today. Or £45,952 m³.The avarage square metre price in Westminister is £19,749.

  • @DagothXil
    @DagothXil 3 роки тому +10

    catch me running to stand at the base of it as it starts to roll up so I can be in octagon jail for an indeterminate amount of time

  • @judygirod8911
    @judygirod8911 8 років тому +12

    I love it-- both beautiful and functional.

  • @quantum2432
    @quantum2432 3 роки тому +14

    This is poly bridge!!

  • @80sMeavyHetal
    @80sMeavyHetal 2 роки тому

    Guy in the background "Noou, oh noou... YES! Yeees. Ok, let's make it cheaper, let's put springs here and a muscle there..."

  • @franktuckwell196
    @franktuckwell196 3 роки тому +2

    So simple yet elegant to look at. ( i bet it wasn't easy to design though ).

  • @alexchapman3906
    @alexchapman3906 3 роки тому +3

    I now want to have a house with a moat around it and this as the gate.

  • @nirsaannas4675
    @nirsaannas4675 10 років тому +4

    amazing!

  • @hemanthkakarla2099
    @hemanthkakarla2099 3 роки тому +1

    i can practically hear the polybridge hydraulics when the bridge goes up and down

  • @wilfredsun4056
    @wilfredsun4056 8 років тому +2

    Thanks, now commute is inconvenient!
    I love waiting for bridges to slowly uncurl.

    • @PaddingtonLondon
      @PaddingtonLondon  8 років тому +6

      +Wilfred Sun You can walk around it, fear not.

  • @janbaxa3282
    @janbaxa3282 3 роки тому +1

    Homeless at morning: dont unroll my house, you dude!!! XD

  • @grimgonemissing
    @grimgonemissing 3 роки тому +2

    This was recommended after watching a recreation in polybridge

  • @Charlienmeg
    @Charlienmeg 4 роки тому +94

    Pretty but pointless. Yep, pretty pointless.

    • @IceX92
      @IceX92 3 роки тому +5

      It's art

    • @lukemini9021
      @lukemini9021 3 роки тому +4

      @@IceX92 art is useless too lol

    • @Wild-Eye
      @Wild-Eye 3 роки тому +3

      @@IceX92 No its not

  • @alakani
    @alakani 3 роки тому +10

    Add this to the list of nice things we could never have in the US because some idiot would figure out how to hurt themselves with it

    • @fishnet420
      @fishnet420 3 роки тому

      And then the comment after answering who it would be

  • @gilliancooper7160
    @gilliancooper7160 3 роки тому

    Wow brilliant

  • @wolfgangloll2747
    @wolfgangloll2747 3 роки тому +1

    If I see it right, the channel end exists there only so that there is a reason for the bridge.
    It reminds me of a restaurant that has a bridge between two ponds... a bridge over solid ground between two ponds.

  • @ladyalicent705
    @ladyalicent705 2 роки тому

    The amount of engineering hurts my head

  • @gibbers313
    @gibbers313 3 роки тому +1

    *Arglin is taking notes*

  • @UncleFexxer
    @UncleFexxer 9 років тому +9

    I thought I was watching Inception for a minute there.

  • @annetteelliott1494
    @annetteelliott1494 7 років тому +3

    I love it....it's novel!

  • @halfbee7886
    @halfbee7886 3 роки тому +1

    Now I wanna see a bridge with soaring wings.

  • @ut7746
    @ut7746 3 роки тому

    I love and hate it at the same time
    It's so cool yet serve so little purpose

  • @TheTrueAltoClef
    @TheTrueAltoClef 3 роки тому

    London Bridge is rolling on,
    Rolling on, rolling on
    London Bridge is rolling on,
    My fair lady

  • @thefrub
    @thefrub 3 роки тому +6

    Ah yes, connecting the vital areas of the left side of the patio and the right side of the patio, saving travelers 20 feet of walking

    • @Dicaso9
      @Dicaso9 3 роки тому +1

      usefull to get across the river dead end

  • @roachbib
    @roachbib 2 роки тому

    civil engineers channel introduced this to me i had to search it

  • @reynaldoseifertnetto3871
    @reynaldoseifertnetto3871 3 роки тому

    De um edifício para outro .. possível chance de salvar vidas em incêndios..

  • @byrongardner9299
    @byrongardner9299 2 роки тому

    I wish this didn't have the music so you could hear the bridge in action

  • @radnukespeoplesminds
    @radnukespeoplesminds Рік тому

    This is alot better than the vessel

  • @MrMousekillaz
    @MrMousekillaz 9 років тому +2

    very interesting....

  • @American_PhilippineA
    @American_PhilippineA Рік тому

    imagine ur right at the end of the bridge when suddenly it curls up and you have to walk back

  • @yash1152
    @yash1152 3 роки тому

    1:10 nice use of hinges, links, and hydraulics.

  • @ObviusRetard
    @ObviusRetard 3 роки тому

    Now that's an architects bridge

  • @sleep-nyan_the_cat
    @sleep-nyan_the_cat 4 роки тому

    A perfect octagon

  • @MrIgottap
    @MrIgottap 3 роки тому

    That's so cool and practical if used somewhere for boating clearance. Too bad in America it would be vandalized into garbage in a month or two.

  • @fallenwout
    @fallenwout 3 роки тому +1

    For some reason, I got instant back pain when looking at the bridge move.

  • @hesterclapp9717
    @hesterclapp9717 3 роки тому +1

    Why does this look like it was designed in Poly Bridge?

  • @cian4380
    @cian4380 3 роки тому +2

    "How did you die?"
    I was decapitated by a bridge that atracked me

  • @t_dog8774
    @t_dog8774 9 років тому +1

    so cool

  • @eun-gyungkim2528
    @eun-gyungkim2528 2 роки тому

    Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @massimookissed1023
    @massimookissed1023 3 роки тому

    Gotta keep that busy shipping channel open (!)

  • @MisterManTheBestMan
    @MisterManTheBestMan 3 роки тому +1

    It's all fun and giggles until someone gets trapped in there.

  • @shrikantmansara1303
    @shrikantmansara1303 3 роки тому

    what is the need for this collapsible bridge, wouldn't permanent bridge be sufficient?

  • @stevenrussell5937
    @stevenrussell5937 2 роки тому

    Thomas Heatherwick is the designer. Look into his other creations

  • @stevennault5447
    @stevennault5447 3 роки тому

    You want to see a senseless bridge in action, be here Saturday at 2pm...

  • @giteausuperstar
    @giteausuperstar 3 роки тому

    Apparently I'm into bridges now

  • @jaisesstephen6692
    @jaisesstephen6692 4 роки тому +16

    It's a great creation and everyone involved in this must be appreciated BUT is it really required?
    I see ducks just standing next to the bridge in the water. It aint even deep

    • @Boon.Oreo6042
      @Boon.Oreo6042 3 роки тому +3

      I mean, even if it's not deep people will not pass walking trhough water when they are in middle of a city xD
      It's pointless to make it like that? Yes, but the bridge itself it's necesary

    • @Boon.Oreo6042
      @Boon.Oreo6042 3 роки тому +1

      Kind of, but it's better to save time don't you think? The bridge has to be able to move out of the way so boats can move probably, it's just a really fancy way of doing it

    • @kevinj9059
      @kevinj9059 3 роки тому +4

      If we only lived life by doing what is merely "required" it would be a very, very boring existence.

    • @Timeward76
      @Timeward76 3 роки тому +2

      It looks like half art piece, half functional bridge. Its the kind of thing that's interesting.

    • @Dicaso9
      @Dicaso9 3 роки тому +1

      @@Boon.Oreo6042 you know, thats litterally the dead end of the river (canal?, canel? idk) lol

  • @nooahuoponen6173
    @nooahuoponen6173 3 роки тому

    Rce made this to my recomended page

  • @travelingman3732
    @travelingman3732 3 роки тому

    It's pretty, blossoming like a flower. But why wouldn't they just leave it extended? Seems like a waste of time and money to extend and retract it all the time.

  • @amarchez8160
    @amarchez8160 3 роки тому +1

    poly bridge people know this way to well

  • @LB_Amerijuanican
    @LB_Amerijuanican 3 роки тому

    I mean if it was used for your drive way if happening to live on the opposite side of a creek, it'd be neat and keep people from driving up to your house when not home.

  • @deer563
    @deer563 2 роки тому

    Civil engineering you brought me here

  • @wtfismylife
    @wtfismylife 3 роки тому

    How many times can you travel the extra 100ft around before this thing actually extends?

  • @ZorillaMyrid181
    @ZorillaMyrid181 3 роки тому +1

    And then there’s me who’d actively try to get caught inside it

  • @aldente1903
    @aldente1903 9 років тому +86

    only flaw is 0 purpose

    • @snuffysmif9801
      @snuffysmif9801 9 років тому +7

      al dente LOL!... Yep... Probably costed and arm, leg, and an eyeball to build too!

    • @aldente1903
      @aldente1903 7 років тому +2

      further more,, a sliding system can have the same purpose effeciency for less cost, less space

    • @navb0tactual
      @navb0tactual 4 роки тому +7

      @@aldente1903 b-but _a e s t h e t i c s_

    • @Viridian02
      @Viridian02 4 роки тому +2

      @@navb0tactual I
      K
      R

    • @pcpablo2
      @pcpablo2 4 роки тому +2

      Ever built a Snowman?

  • @lastcomment4532
    @lastcomment4532 3 роки тому

    what if i run on it while its still 3/4 the way down and jump to the other side

  • @Tdesparza
    @Tdesparza 9 років тому +29

    This is cool but I don't see be very functional in terms of utility.

    • @scarlet4382
      @scarlet4382 8 років тому +3

      There are boats there, therefore the bridge is just for people to get to the other side when there are not any boats passing through in that particular moment though.
      Sorry for an EXTREMELY late reply, and also if i didn't phase that properly. :)

    • @DeansVideoClips
      @DeansVideoClips 7 років тому +7

      There is a thin wall in the water below where the bridge folds out so nothing can pass anyway. I like the bridge but it would be so much better if it was practical. It would be more fun to use if it folded out onto a little island where people could get stuck for a few hours if they didn't get off in time!

    • @pentachronic
      @pentachronic 7 років тому +3

      The small inlet could've easily be paved for people to walk in the U. Stupid place for a bridge like this and a waste of money!!

    • @ramseyrum5631
      @ramseyrum5631 7 років тому +5

      i visit Merchant square all the time and this bridge add both access value and appeal to the area. It is in tandem with its surroundings. Those who comment on not having value clearly hasn't been to Merchant square. like the buildings, its beauty is in its design and art as opposed to pure functionality. this isn't a pure infrastructure piece. it is an artistic piece.

    • @eeb1977
      @eeb1977 6 років тому +1

      How does the bridge know when to unroll? Does someone press a button, like at a crosswalk, or does it unroll itself automatically every few minutes?

  • @GaskellleoCinema
    @GaskellleoCinema 9 років тому +7

    I would ride my bike over it just as it was going up...

  • @gambitonemillion
    @gambitonemillion Рік тому

    The b1m is where I started… and then I ended up here.

  • @Drnken229
    @Drnken229 3 роки тому +2

    0:28 why put a bridge there, Mister award-winning engineers, when you can literally walk around the water just 10m further?

    • @caroleast9636
      @caroleast9636 3 роки тому +3

      It’s not there out of necessity. It’s a piece of art. Of course you can walk around this token strip of water but that was never the point anyway. To us engineers out there, it’s art that moves. An interesting curiosity. There are many works of art that I’m not interested in but I don’t bother running them down. If we all liked the same things then life might be simpler but very boring.
      I believe it was privately funded, so no taxpayers money was wasted. If it doesn’t interest you, then just walk on by.

  • @marvercraft
    @marvercraft 3 роки тому

    UA-cam recommended me here.... I regret nothing

  • @spoonzeee
    @spoonzeee 3 роки тому

    what is your on the bridge and it just rolls up
    painful

  • @Siddingsby
    @Siddingsby 2 роки тому +1

    Half a million £ for this. 10 years later the same design studio managed to con London out of 50 million £ and they didn't even end up building the Garden Bridge.

  • @krunal_466
    @krunal_466 3 роки тому +3

    Polybridge with rtx on

  • @obganag
    @obganag 3 роки тому +2

    That was like a 35k budget wasnt it

  • @anthonygreenwood9995
    @anthonygreenwood9995 Рік тому

    That is cool…..

  • @jannecs
    @jannecs 2 роки тому

    There wasn't any harder solution for this?

  • @kunphenix781
    @kunphenix781 2 роки тому

    I want to just sit on the not moving piece and let the bridge catch me lol

  • @Tiagongz
    @Tiagongz 4 місяці тому

    can you stay inside it?

  • @drivemediareviews
    @drivemediareviews 2 роки тому

    Does it still operate..?

  • @leukota
    @leukota 3 роки тому

    Man you guys have a lot of security cameras over there, I bet you couldn't unstick your balls without someone knowing

  • @vuza752
    @vuza752 3 роки тому

    I'm surprised by the use of linear pneumatic actuators, I would have thought this could be achieved using passive springs instead of the actuators for the curl up action, and a cable along the entire back of the structure, which could be tightened to force the bridge down into the uncurled position.

    • @atlsoldier27
      @atlsoldier27 2 роки тому

      This would introduce a world of problems as far as upkeep. The linear pneumatics are far better in outdoor environments. Considering its around water,

  • @ZinoAmare
    @ZinoAmare 3 роки тому

    I clicked because I saw this on Real Civil engineer not searched for this is like GOOGLE KNOWS?! Edit part, It's legit faster to walk around it xD but it is very cool tho Looks like a scorpion tail ready to attack!

  • @xxxsanyeo
    @xxxsanyeo Рік тому

    can i be inside when it closes