Referee rage as Lazio fall in Florence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
  • Vittorio and Alasdair review Lazio's defeat to Fiorentina, including some controversial refereeing decisions that decided the game. We also discuss Baroni's mini-turnover and the upcoming Europa League game against Dynamo Kyiv.
    Subscribe to the Channel ▶️▶️▶️tinyurl.com/re...
    Visit Our Patreon Page ▶️▶️▶️ / laziolounge
    Visit Our Shop ▶️▶️▶️laziolounge.sto...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3

  • @BillyBeenFishing
    @BillyBeenFishing 22 години тому

    my friends I’m in the Rome area from the 25-30. I hope we can get a win before I leave.

  • @PotatoBearRawr
    @PotatoBearRawr День тому +2

    I feel it is a bit too brave to play Dia as a false-10 and Noslin as a false-9...
    Dia is optimal in the false-10 role (basically a no9 playing in the no10 position, the reverse of a false-9), but if that is his position, then we need a real 9 as well.
    Honestly, both Dia and Taty fit best in the false-10 role, and I am surprised that Taty is never tested there. We seem to just end up with 4 players, who can play the no9 position, but we need a big bad mofo center forward type player tactically (Haaland etc.).
    This is all just getting a bit to creative.
    And Noslin is simply too short to be a natural no9 (honestly, so are Dia and Taty, Taty just should compete in the Olympics in high jump), and we cannot just overload the pitch with weird offensive types, and then expect success. We need an anker. We could play Zaccagni in the centre to be that anker, but that would just make everything worse.
    We need a Muriqi... Or Caicedo... Or something like that, but who can score goals (also in the first half).
    Currently we are bit screwed without Dia-Taty. But maybe Tchaouna and Noslin just need time to be better up top.

  • @PotatoBearRawr
    @PotatoBearRawr День тому

    I wish there was more transparency with referee reviews. During the week, you could literally have the designator go through questions from clubs about decisions, so the whole thing could just be more clear and transparent. This keeping it in the family approach is not helping the game, and only empowers conspiracies...
    I do not even remember the Patric situation (what minute was it). If it is still Rocchi, then just let him explain in the context of the game, why the refereeing team did like they did, and what should be improved.
    Public debate is a healthy thing, and it leads to a greater focus on objectivity instead of questions about characters.
    As I saw the game and the situations, all the penalties in the game, where given, and we lost because we tactically pushed so far forward that we stressed our defenders into mistakes. Guendouzi should not have been that far back, he has never played well in our own penalty area. Hopefully Baroni takes note of Guendouzis limitations, because if applied correctly, then he is a potential world class midfielder. He is box-to-box, just not inside either of those boxes.