Carl Jung - What are the Archetypes?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • In this video we investigate what Carl Jung called archetypes, explaining what they are, how they influence our lives, their relationship to symbols, and their connection to religious experiences.
    ============================================
    Patreon: / academyofideas
    PayPal: www.paypal.me/...
    Amazon Affiliate Link: amzn.to/2kI9BuL
    Sign up for our mailing list: academyofideas....
    Get the transcript: academyofideas....
    ============================================
    Recommended Reading:
    The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious - Carl Jung - amzn.to/2kHxK4B (affiliate link)
    The Myth of Meaning in the Work of C. G. Jung - Aniela Jaffe - amzn.to/2kuFoyc (affiliate link)
    The Origins and History of Consciousness - Erich Neumann - amzn.to/2kuG32E (affiliate link)
    Ego and Archetype - Edward Edinger - amzn.to/2kQl8KJ (affiliate link)
    The Creation of Consciousness: Jung's Myth for Modern Man - Edward Edinger - amzn.to/2kHGsiW (affiliate link)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @academyofideas
    @academyofideas  7 років тому +225

    Become a Supporting Member and get access to exclusive videos: academyofideas.com/members/
    ===========
    Recommended Reading:
    The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious - Carl Jung - amzn.to/2kHxK4B (affiliate link)
    The Myth of Meaning in the Work of C. G. Jung - Aniela Jaffe - amzn.to/2kuFoyc (affiliate link)
    The Origins and History of Consciousness - Erich Neumann - amzn.to/2kuG32E (affiliate link)
    Ego and Archetype - Edward Edinger - amzn.to/2kQl8KJ (affiliate link)
    The Creation of Consciousness: Jung's Myth for Modern Man - Edward Edinger - amzn.to/2kHGsiW (affiliate link)

    • @tommyobrien6749
      @tommyobrien6749 7 років тому +12

      This is one of the coolest channels on youtube!

    • @oJoJo
      @oJoJo 7 років тому +5

      yes! its great to listen to before reading

    • @drpebbs
      @drpebbs 7 років тому +7

      1. On their website they say that its the work of two individuals. Its a business, not a hobby and they are working to support themselves.
      2. What makes someone "qualified" to talk about ideas? I'd say that their other works and the fact thats its an educational UA-cam channel gives them enoguh credibility?
      3. Asking a basic question like that is a form of introduction to a topic they are discussing, just like writing a paper in school. Are they going to assume that everyone knows the answer to this "basic" question, especially if the whole point of the video is to educate people on the answer.
      Now, I have to ask, do you think you're smart or something? Because you sound like a real narcicistic shithead to me.

    • @drpebbs
      @drpebbs 7 років тому +1

      Yeah I bet your a virgin too little beta bitch nigga get rekt

    • @drpebbs
      @drpebbs 7 років тому +2

      Yeah but you did win sorry buddy lol

  • @JCMiniPainting
    @JCMiniPainting 7 років тому +3672

    Thank God and Man that I live in an era when I can find this information so readily, expedited and flourished.

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 6 років тому +32

      Yes, I love when information is flourished.

    • @bobstone3386
      @bobstone3386 6 років тому +76

      Only thank man. Man created that god of yours that gives you comfort as well.

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 6 років тому +5

      do you know that this "information" does not meet the demarcation criteria.....it doesn't agree with our latest knowledge on how nature works....thus its a pseudo philosophical practice to promote such ideas?

    • @sitespecific
      @sitespecific 5 років тому +1

      Same here!

    • @0i0l0o
      @0i0l0o 5 років тому +123

      @@bobstone3386 acording to this video, Jung would not agree with you. besides, i am fascinated how atheist are alwas so willing to impose their opinion on others, while often ppl of faith when they hear some1s atheist, just move on without any comment "if it works for you, God bless you". i do not understand where that need comes from. and the most improtant thing, it always has at least a small dose of malevolence. relax, enjoy your life. its funny how things turned around in few decades.

  • @properpsychology1276
    @properpsychology1276 2 роки тому +409

    “Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.”
    “There's no coming to consciousness without pain.”
    “Like plants, so men also grow, some in the light, others in the shadows. There are many who need the shadows and not the light.”
    “Your visions will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes.”
    “To be "normal" is a splendid ideal for the unsuccessful.”
    “If the path before you is clear, you’re probably on someone else’s.”
    “Where your fear is, there is your task.”
    -Carl Jung

    • @Salesgurukul
      @Salesgurukul Рік тому +2

      Tx for sharing

    • @jaimeporteous-hz1tg
      @jaimeporteous-hz1tg Рік тому +1

      Love this!

    • @lukestella1
      @lukestella1 Рік тому

      I have a crush on his daughter Kitty.

    • @cw2611
      @cw2611 Рік тому +1

      Thank you for sharing these quotes.

    • @megenberg8
      @megenberg8 9 місяців тому +1

      you have included 7 quotes by the professor. may i give a pointer for each? 1. trust your higher judgment. 2. take a rest and recoup, as often as needed. 3. sometimes the sun becomes too hot & the shade too deep - seek a more favorable situation. 4. know that we have a world to come, of life eternal w/ time for every dream. 5. to be normal is fine, no matter what. 6. if the path is clear it's because no one is on it. 7. if you fear, disengaging COULD BE a step in the right direction. personally, I'd start looking for the exit!

  • @Daparaus
    @Daparaus 6 років тому +841

    This comment section is so damn positive, never thought I’d see a row of comments that are so full of gratefulness and have such positive attitudes. Love you all guys!!!

    • @donblack1571
      @donblack1571 5 років тому +4

      TRu BLu since you found them from now you’ll begin to notice them more easily.

    • @nikdrown
      @nikdrown 4 роки тому +8

      It’s amazing when you find the heights of the intelligence hierarchy beyond the name calling foolishness at the bottom. Some people might take offense to the truth if there is a hierarchy of sorts. There is. If you notice some of the simplest lifestyle people can be the most enlightened and some of the richest in wealth can be depleted. It has nothing to do with wealth and poor. Humbleness and arrogance more so.

    • @nikdrown
      @nikdrown 4 роки тому +2

      Don Antonio I definitely do. It has turned my view of hating people (in truth loving them) but my frustration to ignorant and society as a whole was the reason for that. Strange times we live in indeed but I am glad to not have that hate in my heart truly anymore.

    • @notme-ew9sv
      @notme-ew9sv 4 роки тому

      Look up bahai videos

    • @User-wt9jk
      @User-wt9jk 4 роки тому +1

      The algorithm detects archetypes and suggests such videos to the ones that aren’t very excited by pointless hate I guess 😄

  • @joerogaine7984
    @joerogaine7984 5 років тому +524

    My childhood friend was always a normal kid. His interests were sports, video games, and working out. When we were 18 we started using drugs. We frequently abused weed, coke, and adderall. His personality began to change. Then we did lsd. He loved it so much, that one night he took 6 tabs alone. He ended up stripping his clothes, and run into the streets shouting gibberish. He was arrested and diagnosed with schizophrenia and autism.
    During this time, he lived with me for 6 months. He was never an artsy person but all of a sudden he was really into music, drawing, and movies. He lost 50 lbs of muscle and was skinny. I was cleaning out his room when he moved out. He left a notebook. Inside were BEAUTIFUL artwork of religous symbolism that were dated back to our lsd days. Insane for a guy who never was into that stuff. Collective consciousness maybe?

    • @yanikeonpurpose
      @yanikeonpurpose 5 років тому +125

      No. He LOST consciousness. Earthly consciousness. He lost his grounding & connection to his mental body & gained greater access to the higher realms. Art & all that stuff exists in other realms- some people just have a higher propensity to access them like artists. This is why they end up consuming so much drugs. Drugs gives you greater access to those realms. I hope he’s ok now. Take him to a Shaman. His mental body needs to be reattached to his physical body & his soul blown back into his body. An entity has most likely has those parts & will not return it unless there is an intervention.

    • @yanikeonpurpose
      @yanikeonpurpose 5 років тому +23

      Rappin Devour ... says someone I’ve never met a day in my life. Why would a person you’ve never met listen to anything you have to say????? Are you ok? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who needs to go to the shrink,-you or me?

    • @lunargixx6867
      @lunargixx6867 5 років тому +61

      Stay away from drugs

    • @MandenTV
      @MandenTV 5 років тому +44

      Joe Rogaine Don't mess with drugs that aren't prescribed to you by a professional lol. It's not unheard for people to have a psychotic episode due to drug use and destroy their mind forever without pharmaceutical intervention.

    • @lenplummer9333
      @lenplummer9333 5 років тому +17

      Cool results but what a cost. Hope ur friend is ok.

  • @barniespacullie3812
    @barniespacullie3812 5 років тому +100

    Jung is literally my overall opinion on the entire realm of the unknown. It's crazy how I really had these ideas when I was young, and I simply just lacked the words to describe what i felt dictates our perceived existence

    • @roflswamp6
      @roflswamp6 5 років тому +5

      I feel the same with Nietzsche

    • @Commielover69
      @Commielover69 Рік тому +5

      And your mind was thwarted by others fearing you'd look dumb

  • @avirupmukherjee6829
    @avirupmukherjee6829 7 років тому +1653

    great work. best use of Internet

    • @tripjj8662
      @tripjj8662 6 років тому +8

      I can think of a better use

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 6 років тому +6

      Yeah, no shit. "Best?" Come on, people, don't be dumbasses.

    • @siegfriedpintar
      @siegfriedpintar 6 років тому +40

      Maybe not the best, but certainly better than using it as a sheer form of entertainment. It's as if people don't even comprehend the vast volume of knowledge available today.

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 6 років тому +1

      That's very true and well put.

    • @xWingzTV
      @xWingzTV 5 років тому +6

      Nah nigga the best use of the internet is pornhub don’t @ me 😤

  • @agggg3524
    @agggg3524 6 років тому +3952

    Archetypes are ancient memes humans have wired deep into their brains.

    • @sadkeannu
      @sadkeannu 6 років тому +224

      This is the video's entire message in one comment

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 6 років тому +22

      You do understand that the idea of archetypes and Analytical psychology is not part of the science of Psychology...right?
      Do you understand the value of the criteria of Demarcation?

    • @eve36368
      @eve36368 5 років тому +21

      Basically. These days we might call these religious tropes.

    • @eve36368
      @eve36368 5 років тому +31

      Nickolas Gaspar I know Freud was a fraud scientist, would've been a great literature professor & that we only study his scam ass because he came up with the valuable idea of the unconscious & because he screwed over so many people yet gave psychology more visibility. I also know Jung was a student of Freud's.

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 5 років тому +56

      @@eve36368 Well try taking an academic course in psychology. You will see that most of Freud's hypotheses have gain traction based on modern empirical discoveries. This is because Freud's ideas were speculations, but they were falsifiable (not all of course). Jung's ideas on archetypes are unfalsifiable.
      This is what separates the work of those two men.
      So I think that the label "fraud" is irrelevant when it comes to Freud.

  • @Obtaineudaimonia
    @Obtaineudaimonia 7 років тому +920

    This is a great introduction to some of Jung's ideas.

    • @zuyialwuris9279
      @zuyialwuris9279 6 років тому +2

      Eudaimonia
      Carl Jung's " identical psychic structures common to all" may alignment to the Islamic concept called 'Fitra'.

    • @rwheels6471
      @rwheels6471 5 років тому +2

      Yah this channel is great for finding things to study up on

    • @peterribolli8300
      @peterribolli8300 5 років тому

      Daniel Andersson : interesting.
      Who to believe, is the perplexing question?

    • @TigersTalons
      @TigersTalons 5 років тому

      Klaa2 I like that! Lol

    • @blaise4468
      @blaise4468 4 роки тому +6

      Sohel Qureshi you’re missing the whole point. Yes that quote might line up with some sort of Islamic version of this idea, but like Jung was saying; this way of thinking is already an archetype within the mind of us all. There are other names for it in many cultures / religions it doesn’t mean Islam is the sole truth.

  • @jamaljohnson9734
    @jamaljohnson9734 7 років тому +397

    That last quote is a beauty.

    • @kevinbill9574
      @kevinbill9574 7 років тому +6

      I actually thought it should say; "As far as we can discern, the purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness *by* mere being"

    • @ORaddlyispissedoff
      @ORaddlyispissedoff 7 років тому +3

      Kevin Bill then you misunderstand, because mere being is unconsciousness it would be rather counterproductive for him to build up that consciousness is mankind's destiny and end that with "humanity must merely exist" to fulfill it

    • @kevinbill9574
      @kevinbill9574 7 років тому +2

      ORaddlyispissedoff but our mere being would not be unconsciousness because consciousness is inherent to who we are

    • @christopherd1356
      @christopherd1356 7 років тому +3

      Actually I think Kevin Bill's version is better, and for lack of a better word, Jung was full of shit. Actually he probably said what he said in German. The interpretation here sounds like the mouthings of a snobby intellectual. lol. Actually I love Jung, I just think he shouldn't be taken too seriously.

    • @ORaddlyispissedoff
      @ORaddlyispissedoff 7 років тому +7

      Christopher D then what the hell's the point of your comment? Jung here wasn't trying to be poetic or anything, he was expounding a theory so this isn't about how nice it sounds but what sense it makes. If he says by mere being he trashes what he was saying previously, the unconscious is the natural state, expanding the reaches of consciousness to shed a light into unconsciousness requires more than just being, any other conclusion is meaningless sophistry

  • @dusandragovic09srb
    @dusandragovic09srb 5 років тому +106

    Channels like this one are priceless. Respect.
    I wrote "Channel's", it really is the Apocalypse.

  • @bull1234
    @bull1234 5 років тому +729

    "True knowledge is not knowing.
    Presuming to know is a disease."

    • @c.s.70
      @c.s.70 5 років тому +26

      To your first part: If that is the case, How do you know that is true? Logically it self-contradicts.

    • @Jardarny
      @Jardarny 5 років тому +79

      ​@@c.s.70 That's a great point.
      I think that the solution to that paradox is that there are actually two different meanings of "know" in the original sentence. Let me try to explain (my view of the issue):
      We can call one "True knowledge" or just "knowledge", and the other "belief".
      Knowledge where one doesn't use thought in order to know. Thus, just to point that out, it becomes very difficult to talk about, so just try to bear with me. An example of this is the fact of existence. How do you know you exist? If you are going to find out whether you exist or not, do you depend on logical reasoning, or can you just sort of check?
      So in short, all direct, sensory experiences are knowledge. When you eat an orange, you "know" the taste of the orange. When you see a tree, you "know" the visual experience of "tree".
      The other kind of knowledge is based on thought. For example if I ask you your age, your name, the capital of Assyria, what you consider the best university in the UK, and so on. It is not really direct knowledge as described above, but sort of second-hand knowledge. None of these things you can really 100% "know". There could have been an error in the time of your birth certificate, for example.
      So in the latter case, what you really "know" is that you have a thought telling you something. Then you believe or don't believe that thought. So in that way, the latter case is actually a belief. In contrast, when you taste an orange, the experience of orange-taste is not a matter of belief. You "know" it, intimately.
      When you start to explore this, you might come to see that so much of what you believe to be true, i.e. what you think you know, actually is just belief, and that your reasons for believing them may be much weaker than you originally believed. You might also find that when looking at the world in this way, you start to see it more directly, not filtered through your beliefs and opinions about whatever you're interacting with. So the world becomes more and more a mysterious kind of unknowable "it is just what it is" experience, which it actually always was - it was just that we believed we knew what it is!
      Then you might start saying things like "True knowledge is not knowing".

    • @c.s.70
      @c.s.70 5 років тому +19

      @@Jardarny Thank you man for taking all that time to clarify! I guess I was being too literal. I was apprehensive that it would be a version of what I consider a prevalent disease of postmodern relativism with the premise that nothing can be known nonsense disguised as ancient wisdom or interpreted as such. There are certain limitations and vagaries with language in communicating complex meanings that I struggle with, I crave for NDE like telepathic downloads (Highly recommend Overwatchproject youtube channel regarding nature of reality). Yes, agreed, I think Einstein said something similar along the lines of 'only idiots are incapable of wonder' (albeit in less flattering phrasing). Appreciate your explanation and clear breakdown with examples. Very clear. You have a gift breaking down semantics and concepts into their clear components. Have you considered teaching? Not necessarily in the traditional prison school sense, but bits of it like in youtube or blog, etc.? There's a lot of confusion in semantics and false premises out there that many take for granted. Anyways, thanks and have a great day!

    • @Jardarny
      @Jardarny 5 років тому +10

      ​@@c.s.70 Glad I could be of help.
      And I really appreciate the positive feedback! As a matter of fact I just started my own business as a meditation teacher this year :)

    • @alison2161
      @alison2161 5 років тому +1

      Anthony Salvatore well said

  • @diedertspijkerboer
    @diedertspijkerboer 4 роки тому +35

    This is a clear explanation of Jung's ideas, thank you.
    My thought about the archetypes is that the term is a bit confusing because it is used to describe two different things: the "organs" in the mind and the stories to which we respond. I would suggest that there's a kind of lock and key mechanism at play. The archetypical stories are the keys to the locks in our mind. The locks in our mind respond to the stories with something like satisfaction or interest, whereas we don't enjoy or get bored by stories that don't have the keys.

  • @tiav1104
    @tiav1104 3 роки тому +17

    Jung poses really good arguments for astrology. I recommend researching about it, the cosmology and archetypes in astrology really inspire a lot of jung’s arguments

    • @a.d.marshall2748
      @a.d.marshall2748 2 роки тому

      That's because he was a superstitious demoniac idiot.

    • @tiav1104
      @tiav1104 2 роки тому +2

      @@a.d.marshall2748 you don’t have to agree with him but you can respect the impact he’s made

    • @AI-ch3if
      @AI-ch3if 2 роки тому

      I am sad about the impact he made. ua-cam.com/video/L7L6DZKDd2k/v-deo.html

  • @JennaLeigh
    @JennaLeigh 3 роки тому +51

    Wow. Quite possibly the very best use of the UA-cam platform- sharing important information in brief, easy to follow and understand essays. Much respect and gratitude to you!

  • @elscorcho9391
    @elscorcho9391 2 роки тому +22

    I love this man and his work just as much as the late great Carl Sagan. The aquisition of knowledge to help understand the workings behind our inner and outer universe. Mad love

  • @pistolen87
    @pistolen87 5 років тому +20

    I love how you pick artwork that represents what you're trying to communicate. Some artwork that I've seen before, I now see with new eyes and with greater depth.

    • @Fr33Zone
      @Fr33Zone 5 років тому

      yes. they matched symbols and meaning so good.

  • @waggishsagacity7947
    @waggishsagacity7947 4 роки тому +7

    Jung was, without a doubt, a genius with a brilliant mind. Listening to the exposé about the archetypes is not an easy task; it cannot absorbed (much less, applied) after one hearing; and is worth exploring, even for the sheer intellectual depth & challenge it presents. Thanks for the upload.

    • @AI-ch3if
      @AI-ch3if 2 роки тому

      Jung was misled and deceived, and if you want to know the truth about him, I suggest you go watch Pastor Dave Hunt's exposes on psychology.

  • @aristotle358
    @aristotle358 7 років тому +16

    I remember learning about this some years ago. I read Jung's book (among others) called "Psychology and Religion". This video is a very good representation and well put together.

  • @CharlesMiner
    @CharlesMiner 5 років тому +116

    A wise man once said that we exist in 3 levels: conscious, sub conscious and super conscious. The spirit is life, the mind is the builder and the physical is the result - Edgar cayce

    • @howardjamespatterson4119
      @howardjamespatterson4119 4 роки тому

      Or four Jagrat , svapna , sushupti , turiya, ( literal , dreaming , deep sleep , and the beyond maybe samadhi ? the true witness ? moksha ? ) just a taste of Eastern philosophy. Jung is a tremendous influence in any enlightened process of psychology .

    • @cockycookie1
      @cockycookie1 4 роки тому

      We consist of a bunch of synapses bundled together in certain ways. That's all there is. Sorry.

    • @roseo9177
      @roseo9177 3 роки тому

      I love Edgar Cayce

    • @jhinthevirtuoso4886
      @jhinthevirtuoso4886 3 роки тому

      Just like jungs theory of typology and the four sides of the mind.

    • @billballinger5622
      @billballinger5622 3 роки тому

      @@cockycookie1 maybe when you overcome your identification with a bundle of snypases you can open your eyes to the greater possibilities

  • @travisfiander3528
    @travisfiander3528 7 років тому +10

    I'll just add to the sea of praise and say that you're work is adding a lot of value to peoples lives. Excellent high quality content. :)

  • @FloatingOrbProductions
    @FloatingOrbProductions 5 років тому +135

    Thanks for the essay, Really helpful. Cheers

  • @bobstone3386
    @bobstone3386 6 років тому +135

    "He asks questions that you didn't even think to ask"
    Why does there seem to be a pattern in religious symbols?
    "And here's the solution"
    Collective Unconscious
    *off the charts*

    • @realmma5212
      @realmma5212 5 років тому +2

      and though I'm the main addressee shut up

    • @uberskank1424
      @uberskank1424 5 років тому +2

      Based

    • @robertosvrahimis3304
      @robertosvrahimis3304 4 роки тому +1

      And here’s the solution: culture

    • @cockycookie1
      @cockycookie1 4 роки тому +2

      Because there are things happening all over the world, like thunder/solar eclipses, or needs in all civilisations, like a higher power that gives life meaning. That's where all these nature or fatherly deities come from.

  • @mythosandlogos
    @mythosandlogos 5 років тому +17

    This is the most clear and concise explanation of Jung I’ve heard. Well done! This explanation is definitely going to help me in this mythology project. Thank you.

  • @Vishinskyscritic
    @Vishinskyscritic 3 роки тому +5

    Wow, this is brilliant, I was just writing an essay on Jungian psychology and religious experience but tbh had no real understanding of how they linked but this really cleared everything up. Great video!

  • @covenawhite4855
    @covenawhite4855 4 роки тому +6

    I think Archetypes can be explained by most of humanity having similar life experience with Cultural, Technological, and Economic variations. So when people deal with similar problems OR have similar Successes OR observe similar phenomenon in nature they have similar ideas.

    • @tiberiu_nicolae
      @tiberiu_nicolae 2 роки тому +1

      Yes but there's definitely brain structures/physiology that also makes the human experience hunan

  • @ComradeGoose
    @ComradeGoose 4 роки тому +3

    wow! I learned about Carl Jung close to 10 years ago in an AP Psych class but I just shrugged him off after the class ended. THIS video has really sparked an interest of him in me! Thank you for that!!!

  • @fahadus
    @fahadus 7 років тому +11

    The flow, the material selection, the visuals... Everything is very well done! Thank you for this!

  • @PappyMandarine
    @PappyMandarine 5 років тому +45

    If you haven't been to the depths of Mementos it will be hard to understand the Collective Unconscious.
    Seriously, this is gold made into a video. For those commenting on the lack of examples or concrete meaning as to the archetypes, I have an advice. Check out the major arcanas of the tarot cards, each one represents an archetype, though of course this is not based on Jung's theory and therefore major differences in the definition of this term can be found.
    Some "archetypes" are values (like Justice, Strength, Temperance), some are personal figures (like the Emperor, the Mother, the Self etc.), and some are highly symbolic events in life (like Death, or the major switch of intellectual perspective, or an initiation to a school of thought or religion etc.). Forget about the divination element, and keep an open mind while studying symbols. Also visually the cards are quite beautiful and very rich in symbols.

    • @roflswamp6
      @roflswamp6 5 років тому

      Also Study the zodiac signs !

    • @soprano94
      @soprano94 5 років тому +1

      ayyyy persona 5!

    • @villainoir
      @villainoir 5 років тому

      I read the book 'Jung and Tarot: The Archetypal Journey' and it's amazing! Also there's an oracle deck based on the archetype by Caroline Myss. Since Jung himself spoke a lot about symbolism, learning through the images has been helpful for me.

    • @alison2161
      @alison2161 5 років тому

      Nameless ! Love your perspective

  • @ryukshinigami13
    @ryukshinigami13 3 роки тому +3

    I think Mayan, hindu, ancient egyptian, and buddhist symbols and art styles are archetypal and buried somewhere within our collective unconscious. I've spent years in the deep end of psychedelic exploration, and from the very beginning I would see the symbols, art, and hieroglyphics of those ancient cultures whenever I would trip hard enough to fully dissociate from reality.
    Sure, the argument could be put forward that merely being made manifest in my hallucinations isn't necessarily indicative of me tapping into some collective unconscious, wherein these images reside. Rather, the counter argument suggests that my mind produced said images, because they were already producible within my memory, given my previous awareness of them.
    My rebuttal to that then is this: Having made the observation and acknowledged that while yes, I was able to recognize some for what the were because of my prior familiarity, other images, unknown in origin, accompanied their more recognizable companions. Some I would not recognize as such until much later, when I would happen across something I saw in a trip while reading or watching a documentary.
    I'm not alone either, I know a lot of psychonauts who have seen the symbology too, as well as the same kind of unknown symbology, whose meaning and origin were discovered only after the fact. In a Chicken or the Egg-like scenario, these images seem to produce themselves deep within our collective unconscious, without any attached definition or meaning giving any hint as to their purpose. They're simply there, waiting to be conjured up in the mind of the individual able to dive deep enough into their psyche to see them.

  • @POKERFACEpro
    @POKERFACEpro 7 років тому +30

    I now understand how influential this was for Joseph Campbell's monomyth

  • @devine_noise
    @devine_noise 4 роки тому +6

    I've just started exploring Jung's work though Ego and Archetype. Thank you for making this video.

  • @SamuelJDavis
    @SamuelJDavis 5 років тому +4

    Dude, you killed it with this video! Thanks for breaking it down. I definitely grasp these concepts tighter now.

  • @feet_first_on_the_moon
    @feet_first_on_the_moon 7 років тому +2

    i'm glad i found this channel! finally a channel which explains interesting philosophical/pscyhological etc concepts

  • @opinionday0079
    @opinionday0079 7 років тому +138

    No one ever seems to give enough Examples of Archetypes for my denseness.

    • @JK-pu8jt
      @JK-pu8jt 5 років тому +25

      Look at the major arcana of the tarot. There are 22 of them there.

    • @robin-vt1qj
      @robin-vt1qj 5 років тому

      @@JK-pu8jt It all makes sense now...

    • @The22Walli
      @The22Walli 5 років тому +6

      Not exactly examples but the images help a lot
      www.soulcraft.co/essays/the_12_common_archetypes.html

    • @SuperDachshund
      @SuperDachshund 4 роки тому +6

      OpinionDay007
      Father, mother, child, old man, anima (woman in man), animus (man in woman), shadow, trickster, self, gate keeper, Oracle, and of course hero.
      There are also archetypal images like cross, equals, swirl (swastika forwards and reverse), dot, arrow, circle, triangle, etc.
      And archetypal sounds. Think of the coolest grooviest blues beats or jazz or swing. Think of the tunes and rhythms that reach down inside of you and pull out the caveman/woman knowing that people across the world and throughout time have the same experience you have. Think Bo Diddly and the west African beats he discovered and put into his own music. THAT’S archetypal!
      These are not the only examples. Many others. It’s a viable subject for research. For instance, I would submit the sword and the gun as archetypal symbols. See Star Wars (light saber) and The Dark Tower (gun as protector) for examples.

    • @headlights4395
      @headlights4395 4 роки тому +3

      One example would be the young hero who must battle a monster, descend into the underworld, and eventually sacrifice himself to the greater good: Gilgamesh, Siegfried, and Beowulf, so distant in time and space, are perfect symbols. The dragon and the treasure he guards, and the Wise Old Man and Wise Old Woman, who explain the world and guide us, are others.

  • @rubirina3727
    @rubirina3727 3 роки тому +5

    With relation to the very last quote, I came across some verses from the Quran which talks about bringing a person out of darkness towards light. And in relation to the Quran, there's a strange thing that came to my notice. It responds to an increased consciousness in a way no book ever did to me in the course of a natural or acquired mental growth over time. It almost felt like the activation of parts of a comprehending disk lying deep inside the realm of previously inaccessible unconsciousness; and those activated parts have now moved on and 'pressed upward' to adjust with as well as expand i.e. update the level of consciousness.

  • @euggiemonad2523
    @euggiemonad2523 4 роки тому +4

    This stuff is deep and wide, and worth every minute of a first, second and third look.

  • @TilveranWrites
    @TilveranWrites 6 років тому +8

    Some interesting points there, thanks. Major archetypes evidently break down into subcomponents, which isn't something I'd really articulated to myself before. The gods in polytheist cultures are archetypal and it's interesting to meditate upon their domains and how they interlink. It does feel a bit like untangling metaphysical spaghetti in the dark though.

  • @RF-no5rc
    @RF-no5rc 5 років тому +32

    NOTE HOW this and most videos never go into the specific archetypes themselves. That's because the knowledge of the hidden is contained within their mandala.

  • @dr.bilalnazir
    @dr.bilalnazir 7 років тому +5

    This is very informative, and you explain it with eloquence, thank you and keep up the good work.

  • @Creepzza
    @Creepzza 5 років тому +5

    Becoming more conscious is the meaning of life? Never thought of it that way, very interesting. Thanks for all your golden content, recommend this channel to all my philosophy/psychology-interested friends.

    • @moony77
      @moony77 2 роки тому

      Yeah, raising from 3D to 5D age of Aquarius 💛

  • @glo.hardie
    @glo.hardie 7 років тому +2

    I love what your channel is about and it is definitely helping me become a better person!!

  • @ben6fingers
    @ben6fingers 7 років тому +10

    your videos a5re the best about the Internet! turning information in to knowledge

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 6 років тому

      you need to elevate your standards of evidence....A random claim in a video about a discredited philosophical interpretation of a psychologist should never be accepted as knowledge.
      You should first investigate why this is not accepted as a scientific framework and then declare it as "knowledge", if it does qualify as such.
      Knowledge are claims which we can act upon and produce further knowledge....I am sure that a magical explanation like this doesn't meet this role.

  • @buffy377
    @buffy377 5 років тому +1

    I’ll be listening to this lecture several times and taking notes? Thank you for your commentary.

  • @Goralyna123
    @Goralyna123 4 роки тому +2

    Beautifully put. I really enjoyed being educated in such a simple but intelligent way. Thank you 🙏

  • @psychetropica3818
    @psychetropica3818 5 років тому +2

    “The sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being” -Jung. We as humans have a call as explorers of the unconscious for it is as vast as the universe itself, we contain within ourselves the symbols and representations of the whole universe, archetypes are a language that convey the meaning of the unfathomable. The universe, the source or "God", call it whatever you want is not governed by the same logical structures as our conscious mind is, neither our unconscious mind; things such as time, space, morals, good or bad. Let's use our logic and concepts not to mutilate our understanding of the whole but as Neumann said to try to "connect the dots", the symbols that surround the things that are too big for our mind and language to convey, but are still so fundamental for our development as individuals and as a collective.

  • @seamus9305
    @seamus9305 7 років тому +35

    It was a revelation when I realised in my thirties how we dream of archetypal images. The divine child, anima/animus, the wise old man, the great mother, the shadow, etc, and how I've been dreaming of them all my life.

    • @gnarthdarkanen7464
      @gnarthdarkanen7464 6 років тому +3

      Not to offend outright, but as food for thought...
      Speak for yourself, Seamus. I'm a lucid dreamer, so I get to dream pretty much whatever I like and wherever I like... It hasn't been a difficult achievement to gain repetitive cognitive capacity at it, in my experience... BUT of course, I can only speak to my own experience.
      Symbols? Archetypal images... not so much... Most of the time, the cigar is still just a cigar. (in my dreams at least) ;o)

    • @Kube_Dog
      @Kube_Dog 6 років тому +3

      Seamus, you dumbass. Almost nobody dreams like that. You may be dreaming about things you read or think about in your waking life, because otherwise you're severely fucked up.

    • @alison2161
      @alison2161 5 років тому +1

      Seamus you are not alone. Many of us do. Many like you.

    • @alison2161
      @alison2161 5 років тому

      Kube Dog stay asleep. No one is trying to waken the dead over here.

    • @210406samantha
      @210406samantha 4 роки тому

      @@alison2161 @Seamus I have them too and that's what brought me here (not the other way around). I share the experience of dreaming about the archetypes

  • @Rkenichi
    @Rkenichi 5 років тому +1

    Very fortunate to have videos like these spread knowledge to ordinary people.

    • @nom7668
      @nom7668 5 років тому

      "ordinary" ?
      Who do you think you are ?

  • @OmarDelawar
    @OmarDelawar 2 роки тому +4

    @10:45, this is just a fancy way of saying: "I made some sh*t up and I cannot prove it" -Carl Jung

    • @memeswereablessingfromthel3942
      @memeswereablessingfromthel3942 2 роки тому

      Well, no. It means that he did not think there would be a science that could figure out such questions, like where the archetypes originate from - similarly to how we do not know where consciousness originates from - and considered it as merely "metaphysical". Such questions may very well be answerable, through cognitive neuroscience and the study of the brain's evolution, which we can speculate more firmly about nowadays because we know more about the possibilities.... but such sciences of the brain were only in their conceptual stages during Jung's life. Besides, his theory isn't about the origin of the structure inside the brain of which the archetypes arise from, it's about the existence of the psychological patterns between all humans (archetypes) themselves. The method he used to "prove" his theory was by gathering evidence and noticing similarities in the unconscious psychology of people throughout different cultures in history and the dreams of his and other psychiatrists' patients. These were then presented in support of his theory. He also intensely explored his own unconscious, which was essential in coming up with his theory.

  • @nemashaw4761
    @nemashaw4761 3 роки тому

    OMG the implication of Jung's description for me is EPIC .I am connecting and unraveling meaning in symbols and word formulations that is key to my effectiveness to have any degree of success going as a poet and an artist!

  • @rafaeljordao
    @rafaeljordao 7 років тому +3

    Gratidão!!! Thank you for this, I have been "circumambulating" this topic, with the videos of Jordan Peterson, and this was a large step to bring a whole lot of knowledge from around me right to my center. Thank you!

  • @diegoalvarado1771
    @diegoalvarado1771 6 років тому +1

    Really thankful you created these videos!

  • @TheSde16
    @TheSde16 4 роки тому +5

    The archetypes are basically different levels of consciousness which everyone goes through, at least to some degree, during their lifetime.
    The first archetype is mercury, or the innocent child. His symbol is an arrow.
    The second is venus, the maiden. Her symbol is a nabla.
    Next Luna, the rebellious teenager. Her symbol is a crescent.
    After that is terra, the mother. Her symbol is a leaf, or a droplet.
    Next there's mars, or the warrior. His symbol is a spade.
    Then there's Minerva, the queen. Her symbol is a heart.
    Next is Jupiter, or the lover. His symbol is a cross.
    Next is Saturn, the storyteller. His symbol is a triangle.
    Next is caelus, the thinker. His symbol is an eye.
    After that there's Neptune, the leader. His symbol is a crown.
    Next there's triton, the helper. His symbol is a star.
    Then there's Pluto, the enigma. Her symbol is an infinity symbol.
    And finally, there's Nox and Sol, or the crone and the father. Nox is symbolised by a circle and sol is symbolised by a diamond.
    P.s. I used the Roman gods because people are more familiar with them than gods from other cultures, but literally every culture I've ever studied has all of these gods/archetypes just under different names. All of these archetypes exist within everyone and you can even channel their consciousness through meditation, yoga and the arts.

  • @skylxntrn
    @skylxntrn 5 років тому +1

    Your channel is a joy to watch, appreciate your videos so much!

  • @nikolasburley649
    @nikolasburley649 4 роки тому +3

    Great point and metaphor at the end about light. It explains plainly our existential goal. I love that Christ calls himself the light, fits right in 💯

  • @fjollazllatku4757
    @fjollazllatku4757 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for your video, it was really useful, especially the way it develops, how you make a chain of ideas nicely put together.Keep up the good work. Best wishes.

  • @osyg8766
    @osyg8766 4 роки тому +7

    “As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being” ~Carl Jung 💕
    This really give me some Prometheus vibes; how Prometheus gifted us fire and a type of morality 🥰🌸

  • @strengthodyssey7235
    @strengthodyssey7235 6 років тому +1

    Thank you for posting this clear introductory video of Carl Jung's Archetypes.

  • @Jaccobtw
    @Jaccobtw 7 років тому +13

    I think that last quote has some very, very, profound implications.

  • @TheDoodlingDino
    @TheDoodlingDino 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you; this is the clearest I've heard this explained.

  • @carolzaher2655
    @carolzaher2655 2 роки тому +4

    I wish I could've met Carl! One of the greatest minds ever ❤️

  • @hedgehog-ho9sx
    @hedgehog-ho9sx 4 роки тому

    you're videos are a treasure, i cannot think of any other way of discovering these wonderful ideas that too in such a comprehensive manner.

  • @SidSirius
    @SidSirius 4 роки тому +71

    We know a lot about consciousness, we know nothing about how the unconscious connects with the self. Nor what it exactly is. That's why we cannot fix the damage that is done to a sick brain.
    Our science is obsessed with studying what can be seen and totally ignores studying forces structures and the unseen.
    We must learn that everything is connected with everything else. That all is relative perspective experienced through duality

    • @azaleaslight7243
      @azaleaslight7243 3 роки тому

      Dr Joe Dispenza goes beyond others, check him out as he does what your asking for 🙌

    • @designerelise
      @designerelise 3 роки тому

      @@johnlawrence2757 "no-one is good to the extent of being effective as protection against negativity." I don't think there is any amount of good that could counter-balance negativity, rather neither good nor bad in any extent can protect against randomness, the variability always at play.

  • @testalem3968
    @testalem3968 5 років тому +2

    Thank you Academy of Ideas...very well presented!

  • @donmowen1978
    @donmowen1978 7 років тому +164

    There was not very much mentioned on the actual archetypes and examples given.

    • @CosmicNous
      @CosmicNous 6 років тому +19

      Jung himself doesn't clearly define what they are. He just proposed that there are archetypes based on his observations.

    • @dahvoun3918
      @dahvoun3918 6 років тому +8

      Like Jung said, archetypes are similar to physical organs, but they can not be observed physically like our organs. They can only be observed through our similar correlated use of signs of symbolism.

    • @Caprese1.0
      @Caprese1.0 6 років тому +1

      We cannot observe the archetypes directs. Perhaps this means we cannot become conscious of these. Yet again, maybe we can?

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 6 років тому +2

      Because its not an accepted concept and Analytical psychology is not part of modern Psychology. Is in the realm of Pseudo claims.

    • @martialkintu2035
      @martialkintu2035 5 років тому +4

      Yeah, I expected that to but I can't say I'm disappointed.

  • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
    @ChaoticNeutralMatt Рік тому

    That.. the fact that his study of mythos brought this about (archetypes) makes so much sense to me. I hope you help expand this with my limited life experience building on the works of others.

  • @neonpop80
    @neonpop80 7 років тому +3

    Wow! This is incredible and is my story in the last year when in a moment I opened my eyes and started changing my beliefs in so many ways. As a staunch atheist to seeing reality in symbols. I see the whole world when seen this way is more holistic and it holds a higher meaning that we are unconscious of. And yes, our purpose is to bring light into this collective unconscious we seem to come from and interact with. Its all there as either information that needs manifestation through expansion of consciousness.

  • @tunthianlalhauzel9752
    @tunthianlalhauzel9752 5 років тому +1

    As always loved your videos as it introduces the viewer to new and different ideas from famous and unknown people. Keep it up.

  • @ilikestarsun
    @ilikestarsun 6 років тому +34

    Explains why people experience God when on DMT, it's the symbol for the Self, for the Brahman within , the mystery of the source, the witness

    • @DhilipNexus
      @DhilipNexus 5 років тому +1

      True I saw it when on DMT

    • @jeanb322
      @jeanb322 5 років тому +3

      isn't it why we are created in his image, they get to understand him within themselves. A totality of understanding.

    • @nsjx
      @nsjx 4 роки тому

      intriguing, isn't it

  • @rominahashemi7959
    @rominahashemi7959 3 роки тому +1

    I'm so glad that I find this channel

  • @waldonunez8311
    @waldonunez8311 3 роки тому +6

    Gracias , hasta ahora , tenía ciertas dificultades con el entendimiento sobre el significado de los arquetipos , sin embargo , pareciera que en los mitos se revelan ciertos patrones que encauzan la conducta humana dándole un significado existencial..... desde Sudamérica gracias por poner subtítulos en español...🌈🌴

  • @sidquatrine
    @sidquatrine 2 роки тому

    This Can Get Rather Complex Rather Quickly, However This Video Explains It In A Comprehensible An Concise Manner, Thank You

  • @villiestephanov984
    @villiestephanov984 6 років тому +18

    Sola Scriptura literally means single verse. The Alpha and the Omega. Why? I was crucified with Christ. Yet it is not I who live.. ( Mark 15:26) Luke 20:8 :)

  • @arbaazfarooqi3572
    @arbaazfarooqi3572 4 роки тому

    no opinions no agenda just pure information and knowledge...loved the video!!!

  • @RaedMarji
    @RaedMarji 4 роки тому +5

    "As far as we can discern the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being"

  • @angelo8516
    @angelo8516 Рік тому +1

    I like how such an important subject matter as human consciousness was addressed in this vid. It touched on the metaphysical at some points!✨
    Very interesting explanation. Thanks for posting!👍✌🕊

  • @miguelpereira9859
    @miguelpereira9859 4 роки тому +6

    I often dream of dark, tight underground spaces, sometimes with water, or of really high places, like dizzying high, and sometimes the combination of both. Also I had a dream about me and some other person fighting for balance on top of a stick/narrow platform.
    Another theme in my dreams is often giants, colossi or really big entities, and me running away from them. Do you think any of this has to do with this theory of the collective unconscious?

    • @josephfarrar1089
      @josephfarrar1089 8 місяців тому

      These all seem to be more expressions of your day to day. running from problems etc.

  • @andrewcole4255
    @andrewcole4255 2 роки тому +1

    The last quote is a beautiful landscape of truth.

  • @paulmoore7064
    @paulmoore7064 4 роки тому +4

    I am reminded of the "Fire Sign Theatre" comic dialogue between a missionary and a Native American.
    Missionary: "On your knees now, lads. Do you know what I'm holding in my hand?"
    N.A: "It's a cross, the symbol of the division of the Earth into active and passive forces."
    Missionary: "Ah, God have mercy on your heathen souls!"

  • @kennethroark917
    @kennethroark917 6 років тому +2

    Excellent!! I am grateful! You made me understand the meaning of Archetype!

  • @jakewilliams9811
    @jakewilliams9811 6 років тому +3

    I know this is an older video and may not get a reply, but in regards to the end where Jung states that we should endeavor to expand our conscious mind, could it be argued that a ‘super intelligent mind’ is one that has expanded its consciousness to encompass 80% of the mind or more, rather than 20 or 30? One of the many reasons I love psychology! Thanks for the video!

  • @elizabethvaughn5694
    @elizabethvaughn5694 4 роки тому +2

    This is my favorite side of UA-cam 💫

  • @satnamo
    @satnamo 5 років тому +3

    My task is to become conscious of the contents that press upward from the unconscious. The sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness by mere being.

  • @adammeadows695
    @adammeadows695 6 років тому +1

    As difficult as it is to nail down what archetypes point to, it seems almost as if, in effect, they're the result of a basic 'operating system' within the mind that allow consciousness operate at a 'factory settings' level.

  • @decap008
    @decap008 7 років тому +11

    Nice but I was kinda hoping for a list of archetypes / symbols. Given the title of this video. The self was explained, the shadow was not, the
    meaning of the sun eater was not. I will look elsewhere for a list.

  • @Παθεια_Γνωστικα
    @Παθεια_Γνωστικα 4 роки тому +1

    Wow, nice final quote. Especially hearing it at 11:11 am.

  • @toomuchdanny2834
    @toomuchdanny2834 4 роки тому +3

    My friend introduced me to Jung and we watched this video while on acid. It was VERY INTENSE and I highly recommend it.

  • @MansSuperPower
    @MansSuperPower 6 років тому +1

    I just supported your channel through Paypal.
    Thank you for your great work. Your content is intellectual, concise, and understandable. Keep up the good work. Thank you.

    • @academyofideas
      @academyofideas  6 років тому +1

      I appreciate it. Thank you.

    • @MansSuperPower
      @MansSuperPower 6 років тому

      You’re welcome. You deserve it. There’s more to come. Your work is the kind of work that deserves monetary support.

  • @estherrogers5553
    @estherrogers5553 5 років тому +20

    9:57 what is the ultimate source of the archetypes... Um God, He made us like this. Ecclesiastes 3:11

    • @harleyjameson1939
      @harleyjameson1939 4 роки тому +2

      Hebrews 11:3 "By faith we understand the worlds were formed by God by things that are not visible." (paraphrased)

    • @markuspietari
      @markuspietari 4 роки тому +5

      You could just as well say that God is the ultimate archetype. However, as the video states, metaphysical questions are unanswerable.

  • @jasonmitchell5219
    @jasonmitchell5219 7 років тому +1

    Wow, that last phase was beautifully put.

  • @andrewnavarro2537
    @andrewnavarro2537 6 років тому +6

    Carl Jung was actually not the founder of psychoanalysis, he in fact was influenced by Freud. What Carl jung did was expand on the ideas, in the end they are both geniuses that contributed greatly to psychoanalysis.

    • @nickolasgaspar9660
      @nickolasgaspar9660 6 років тому +2

      not really....

    • @afromuthfuka
      @afromuthfuka 5 років тому

      @@nickolasgaspar9660 no Freud no Jung. yes really and that's coming from someone who plans to get a tattoo of jung because i love him that much.

  • @chris432t6
    @chris432t6 2 роки тому

    The last line sums it up beautifully.
    Thank you.

  • @christopherochoa4145
    @christopherochoa4145 4 роки тому +15

    Frankly, I think the basis of inherited knowledge and cultural consciousness has some validity, but after reading I felt how Jung and his students separate the psyche of women and the indigenous into lower or separate categories seemed lacking. I feel like the theory of the anima is all well and good, but the way Jungian theory seems to separate women and indigenous ("bush") psyches as less complete or developed leaves me unconvinced of the soundness of his theory as written. I think some of Jungian theory is overly gendered and a little ethnocentric, but at the core I think there is a lot of value in the observation of our connection to ancient symbols and archetypes, and I see truth in that.

    • @Lucia-io3dn
      @Lucia-io3dn 4 роки тому

      i agree. that's why I only read women's jungian analysis now

  • @Havre_Chithra
    @Havre_Chithra 7 років тому

    These are some of the best videos on youtube.

  • @kangakid5984
    @kangakid5984 6 років тому +17

    Plato's pre existance forms and quest seem to be the square root to Jung's derivations of archetypes

  • @Wingedmagician
    @Wingedmagician 7 років тому +1

    This has to be one of my favorite videos on youtube wow

  • @dariagc597
    @dariagc597 5 років тому +132

    Let’s study, armys!

    • @yoonphoria
      @yoonphoria 5 років тому +5

      Daria GC I’m using the archetypes to psychoanalyze a short story for my English final lol, thank you BTS 🙌🏼💜

    • @carryonmywaywardsam7513
      @carryonmywaywardsam7513 5 років тому +9

      Seven comments. And that includes a pinned one. I don't know whether to laugh or be proud of this fandom...

    • @suedawalker8934
      @suedawalker8934 4 роки тому +4

      Haha i was looking for this comment

    • @makireilisachen5676
      @makireilisachen5676 4 роки тому +1

      Damn. Bts really be deep bro.

    • @magicshop96
      @magicshop96 4 роки тому +1

      Yay! 💜

  • @carlamurphy7541
    @carlamurphy7541 2 роки тому

    I love this channel I love how the information is given in a way non academic people like myself can understand

  • @HairGlitter
    @HairGlitter 6 років тому +49

    Some people believe that DNA has memory...

    • @sambo314
      @sambo314 5 років тому +15

      Genetic memory is a real thing. Why do almost all kids get scared of long dark hallways? Or just the dark in general? Why do they like to sleep next to their parents?

    • @bhoksakantakandandi9324
      @bhoksakantakandandi9324 5 років тому +23

      DNA has memory. Therefore there are heritable traits and parents psyche and biology is inherited by their children. Reference " the gene" and " Emperor of all maladies" by Siddhartha Mukherjee

    • @billypoppins9138
      @billypoppins9138 5 років тому +8

      Instinct

    • @Fuar11
      @Fuar11 4 роки тому +5

      @@sambo314 correct. This is even seen in animals too. It's an inherent part of nature. The laws of the universe define these things.

    • @TheWormzerjr
      @TheWormzerjr 4 роки тому +4

      DNA retains information, its not memory, its triggered information. Something has to trigger your memory so you remember who you really are. We are all one. Dont forget again.

  • @UnsterblicheKonig
    @UnsterblicheKonig 5 років тому

    I keep coming across your videos seperate from the fact that i am subscribed to you. Fantastic channel and video as always.