It was inside but it’s just the perspective it was shown made it seem out, if you looked from the top 2mm was still on the line so the goal was counted @remil2006
This is what happens when people watch football through shorts instead of actually watching the matches. Cucurella hand was not a penalty, because there was an offside! The Japanese goal is legal, because the ball needs to leave the pitch 100%, if it is 99.9999% it is considered as being inside!
@@maxxim1771handball is handball no matter if intentional or not. If it wasnt intentional he wouldn't get send off but he would get a yellow card and still a penalty
@@Valast Nope. And if you read what I wrote I didn’t say it wasn’t a handball. What I am saying is how it was interpreted after VAR and that it is correct according to the rules. Intentional or not doesn’t make it ”not a handball”, but it DOES matter if it will be judged as against the rules or not, a penalty or not, a yellow card or not etc etc That’s what VAR checked and they concluded that it wasn’t, hence no penalty. No need to trust me, look it up.
People still don't understand that it WASN'T OFFSIDE and how offside works. It's offside if a part of the body that you're allowed to use to score a goal is behind the line. But it was the hand behind the line. You don't score goals with your hand. Unfair play. Spain used handball twice. Musiala was constantly fouled.
There was no var check if it was offside. However main german news station analysed all avaible footage and said it most likely was not offside. So i don't know how you are all so sure that it was when experts with all avaible footage say it was not.
"Zum vermeintlichen Abseits von Niclas Füllkrug kurz vor der berüchtigten Szene veröffentlichte die UEFA keine Bilder. Einige Aufnahmen lassen jedoch vermuten, dass der Mittelstürmer nicht im Abseits stand." Frankfurer Rundschau
Zum vermeintlichen Abseits von Niclas Füllkrug kurz vor der berüchtigten Szene veröffentlichte die UEFA keine Bilder. Einige Aufnahmen lassen jedoch vermuten, dass der Mittelstürmer nicht im Abseits stand.
the first one has a logic behind it Cucurella was trying to pull his hand inward to avoid the hand ball VAR confirmed it and no penalty was given as a result
I think what happened in the first is that since Cucurella was trying to bring his arm to his body, it is not considered a hand and the game continues and that is why a corner is called, or so I heard.
In the first phase when Cucurella touched the ball, a German player was in an offside position, so there was no penalty, which was the referee's correct decision.
@@YoungFollowerOfChrist for the same reason as some referees whistle an offside a lot of time after, because they want, each one do his work at their way
The reason there was no handball because there was an offside before that. VAR said that handball would not have happened if the offside counted. Pretty annoying tbh
Enough saying this f***ing bs everywhere to defend that shitty ref decision Jesus I don't even like Germany but did the ref know that it was an offside 2 seconds before that if no one official said anything about that? If it was offside why did he continue playing and gave a throw in not an offside? Ref made a mistake, crucial one and didn't even check that afterwards Fortunately Spain deserves to win but Germany doesn't deserve to lose either...
@@nevinbabu8405 pero cundo se acerca a esa parte hay que tener la mano para tras y Alemania no apesta eres tú la que apesta porque ni kroos ni. Rudiger bajarían a tu nivel
Like when you have 1.5 billion people in your country you would think you would actually have good players, but no. All you do is yap about how good Sunil Chetri is even though he is overrated.
@@that1diot651 arre when I say we have good players but we kick a goal again quatar but if these blind referees not present we qualify for 3rd round our players are good only need good coach okkk noob
But FIFA protocol says that if a player has one arm in front of the offside line it does not count as an offside, so it was the referee's error, something else he interpreted as if it were glued arm So it was the referre's error.
People still don't understand that it WASN'T OFFSIDE and how offside works. It's offside if a part of the body that you're allowed to use to score a goal is behind the line. But it was the hand behind the line. You don't score goals with your hand. Unfair play. Spain used handball twice. Musiala was constantly fouled.
Germany one was offside , second one was robbery because there is no line goal tecnology in Spain , third one is clearly a penalty, and the fourth one is a roberry.
@@jonathanziegler8601Carvajal got sent off, plus how did Kross not get a card at his first fault out of many in that game? Answer: the ref Anthony Taylor had alr a bad rep for being a bad ref UEFA knew this and he still got the ref an important matche
I told my friend that the game will be very controversil because Anthony Taylor was the ref.. 🤣 From Kroos not getting a yellow and cucurella becoming the second goalkeeper and not receiving a pen.. man what a night
To everyone saying Füllkrug was offside with his hand they know nothing about football because there is a rule that you cannot be offside with the hand because you are not allowed to score with your hand and he didn't control with his arm,he controlled it with his shoulder.Anthony Taylor is because of this not allowed to be a ref in the Premier League anymore.He can only be ref in the lower leagues now because of that mistake
In the first video, there is a rule by UEFA. when a player shoots towards the goal post and the defending player's hand touches the ball, if the defending player's hand is downwards and leaning behind the body, it won't be considered a hand ball. It was also Posted on ESPN later. Although this rule is to give some space to the defenders, it is a controversial rule. The referee wasn't guilty.
it was handball by curcurrela but fullkrug was offside so it is ok but fifa said that if it touches ur hand in a natural position its no pen but germany v denmark the oen handball was naturall too and no one saw it
Japan one was objectively correct the ball stayed in
Was out …
It was inside but it’s just the perspective it was shown made it seem out, if you looked from the top 2mm was still on the line so the goal was counted @remil2006
A japanese normal fan
@@remil2006it wasn't 100% out, needs to be to be considered out
@@Trep3 that’s why , it was 100% out of
This is what happens when people watch football through shorts instead of actually watching the matches. Cucurella hand was not a penalty, because there was an offside! The Japanese goal is legal, because the ball needs to leave the pitch 100%, if it is 99.9999% it is considered as being inside!
The last one was correct , the Ball was not out a small part was on the line , VAR showed a perfect clip
Same with the third one
You are right
@@thet-rexguy2167😊giat
VAR ruined football
How?? The shadows?😂
the first one is straight-up criminal...
Don't was one German player was blocking the goalkeeper's view
@@varane7286Cucurella blocked the shot withbhis hand thats the problem shouldve been handball
@@varane7286??
Offside
It was offside
Hitoma???😂😂
MITOMA ミトマ
Situation with Araujo and Mitoma has a correct decision.
Araujo no its penalty
Bomber its Vini and Diego how isnt that a pen
@@diegorojas3075it is. No intention with bakl
@@alfredos-der-ost Because Vini is so bad that he always dives
What? Real madrid would still win that match regardless if the penalty was given. @Nugetti378
In the first clip, Cucurella smile after the refer say, it wasn't handball. That was unfair!
Fulkrug was offside
It wasn’t ruled ”not a handball”. It was ruled as not intentional / avoidable and therefore no penalty. Not the same thing.
@@tamerahmedghobashy8680 His name is Füllkrug, not Fullkrug
@@maxxim1771handball is handball no matter if intentional or not. If it wasnt intentional he wouldn't get send off but he would get a yellow card and still a penalty
@@Valast Nope. And if you read what I wrote I didn’t say it wasn’t a handball. What I am saying is how it was interpreted after VAR and that it is correct according to the rules.
Intentional or not doesn’t make it ”not a handball”, but it DOES matter if it will be judged as against the rules or not, a penalty or not, a yellow card or not etc etc
That’s what VAR checked and they concluded that it wasn’t, hence no penalty.
No need to trust me, look it up.
That from mitoma was a few millimeters in the field
Yes
Yes
That is because of the angle, if you look from the top it will still be in.
In the last one the ball was in, in fact if seen by the other player it was in, so the referee's choice to award the goal was correct
Correct it was in, the whole of the ball must be beyond the line n u can kinda tell from even that angle a cm or less is still on the line
@@RIZE.19it’s crazy that most fans and untrained linesmen do not understand this. The ball is round so can see green and it still be in play.
Bro the whole ball went over the line
@@AryanArnoBreker that's because of the angle even if you look at top angle it was a few millimeters in because of the width of the ball.
@@MAAT591 oh ok
The only fair one was the japan goal if u look from the top it was still in play
Feeling bad for Germany 😢😢
Spain now in to Final😅😂
First one was most def a penalty but today's fotboll is so rigid.
Before offside is the rule. No offside, no pnalty
😭😭😭😭😭 crying 😂
Get ur grammar right😂
Bud it wasnt, bc it was offside before 😂😂
Idk why everyone is blaming it on offside I watched the game and no offside was called
Hitoma ❌
Mitoma ✅
Naruto
Ultraman
日本のトッププレイヤーです！
@@user-ni8zi1ld7tfor me nakata is better, but i like morita, fujimoto and nakajima too
@@gorilaxd2023ありがとう！！！
The one which destroyed the dream of India qualifying for world cup😢
😢 fr bro
😂😂😂😂
Football should introduce DRS system just like cricket
People who hate referee
👇
Kid
Kid
u try then lets see how you do
bro just stop yapping if there was no referee then everyone would be fouling each other
Still so many guys who think it was offside , nobody know the rules ---
Only if you watched the game 😞
En cual?
El primero@@pepitofederico
It was offside. You are dumb and dont know the rules
Offside + hand of fullkrug in the control 2-1 😢
Don’t Forget England’s Penalty VS Denmark In Euro 2020(21)😉
I saw that match
@@knutandrehenriksen6693 same🙂
The Most Unfair Result In 2021⚽️
NO SEÁIS TONTOS,ESA REGLA SE PUSIERON DE ACUERDO Y NO IBAN A PITARLA EN LA EUROCOPA ENTERADOS.
es una opinion que dicen lo mismo de los japoneses cuando la pelota se quedo dentro aguantala
The first:
Football❌️
Basketball✅️
Offside
@@Sasha_2968no shut up
@@parsa_god5192are you dumb? Its fair position
before handball, there was a offside
People still don't understand that it WASN'T OFFSIDE and how offside works. It's offside if a part of the body that you're allowed to use to score a goal is behind the line. But it was the hand behind the line. You don't score goals with your hand. Unfair play. Spain used handball twice. Musiala was constantly fouled.
Hand Spain. VAR check hand and possible offiside before? Offiside yes? -> Result: Freekick for Spain. Not a throw in for Germany.
There was no var check if it was offside. However main german news station analysed all avaible footage and said it most likely was not offside. So i don't know how you are all so sure that it was when experts with all avaible footage say it was not.
@@justinleischnig Fullkrug who headed the ball to Musiala was in an Offside position which is why the handball wasn't given
ひとま！？！？！？！？
the last one was acctually in its just the angle
In the first one was offside before that
Bro these referrees have so much technology to use like VAR and their watches but they don't use them.
A legend says Musiala is still waiting for the penalty
Cucurella It's because there was an offside
Its wasent a handball bc kroos fouled Pedri and he didint get a yellow card or red
On the first one Cucurella touches the ball with the hand but people dont know that before that Germany made an offside pass
This is false.
"Zum vermeintlichen Abseits von Niclas Füllkrug kurz vor der berüchtigten Szene veröffentlichte die UEFA keine Bilder. Einige Aufnahmen lassen jedoch vermuten, dass der Mittelstürmer nicht im Abseits stand." Frankfurer Rundschau
Zum vermeintlichen Abseits von Niclas Füllkrug kurz vor der berüchtigten Szene veröffentlichte die UEFA keine Bilder. Einige Aufnahmen lassen jedoch vermuten, dass der Mittelstürmer nicht im Abseits stand.
@@bunkersurf2779 Korrekt. Hab's nochmal dreimal angeschaut. Fülle war nicht im Abseits
Football is not about fairness but about money.
Pour Cucurella c'est parce qu'il y avait eu hors-jeu juste avant la main ça ne peut donc pas être sifflé
Was für ein bullshit. Da war kein anderes
@@dercaller6716Cry german
So, if was offside why referee give Germany a corner instead of free kick for Spain? XD
Taylor Is like the worst ref ever, but I support Spain since Italy Is out.
@@Yogi_7bro not ofside
Before the Cucurelle situation had a offside
Dude,the america one💀
The first one is obviously not controversial, it was clearly a handball.
That was SUCH a handball... natural position... riiiiiight! His whole body was in an unnatural position.
Ik
I get that he was trying to move his hand out the way but it still stopped the ball from going towards the goal💀
Lampard's no goal against Germany left the chat
LA CUCARACHA HANDBALLED GOD DAMN IT!
the first one has a logic behind it Cucurella was trying to pull his hand inward to avoid the hand ball VAR confirmed it and no penalty was given as a result
I think what happened in the first is that since Cucurella was trying to bring his arm to his body, it is not considered a hand and the game continues and that is why a corner is called, or so I heard.
No,It was offside o a german player before,uefa's oficial count said that after the match.
Both hands were in the air and he took his right arm to his body instantly. His left for some reason not though, coincidence? Absolutely not.
Yeah just basic physics. He was moving towards his right arm so obviously it will took him much shorter to close it while left much longer. @@VenoXj1
Cry@@VenoXj1
@@jesusfolgosolozano169 thats a lie.. if it was offside the ref would have called it. He didnt even call offside
For handball its some special rule becase hand is directed to the ground
Bullshit. Why are you people always making shit up?
The best thing in life is the touch of Cocorella's hand and you didn't count a penalty.😂
The first one isnt offside, as the shot was aimed on his hand, and there was no extension of the arm whatsoever, as the result of no handball.
The first one was offside, that's why there was no penalty.
It wasnt 😂😂😂 You must be living under a rock
@@muttertier3930 yes it was. I watched the whole match live, not from shorts unlike you.
@@SnaouiAmine Dont read the offsides rules pls. Stay dumb just like this. Its pure Entertainment
Also a handball from Fulkrug
@@SnaouiAmine Okay kid 😂😂😂 Stay in your own world
In the first one the handball was clear, but before that one german player was in offside, that’s why it wasn’t a penalty
Penalty Penalty
@@vespillo1174 exactly
@@vespillo1174 Liar
@@user-wn7eg1he3i Liar
guys the hand ball for the first one was not given bc it was a offside
In the first phase when Cucurella touched the ball, a German player was in an offside position, so there was no penalty, which was the referee's correct decision.
Fifa gave perfect explanation for the Japan goal. And it was correct.
Cucurella even said himself he was baffled how it wasn't considered handball... Stupid decision.
I find it disgusting that you take the first hand out of context. And on top of that, before there was an offside and a handball from a German player
What do you mean?
No there wasn’t!?
@@YoungFollowerOfChristbasically, there wasnt handball from Cucurella because Fullkrug was offside and there was an early handball
@@ataqueluiginacho531 So why didn't the referee blow earlier?
@@YoungFollowerOfChrist for the same reason as some referees whistle an offside a lot of time after, because they want, each one do his work at their way
for the Japan one, the ball was in by 0.8 millimetres to be exact.
The first one was also correct, there was a previous offside
That cucurella match I was watching and when this happened I literally shouted as high as I could
The reason there was no handball because there was an offside before that. VAR said that handball would not have happened if the offside counted. Pretty annoying tbh
Very true and he was offside. @7Cobra_7
Fullkrug was offside
The first one was offsides that’s why it did not count as a handball
But the player that was offside doesnt touched or attacked the ball
The Ball was Shot at the goal it was not passed to the player so it was handball and not fair for germany
No someone played the boys through and then it came back to Jamal Musiala and he shot it
But the ref still didn't give a free kick or whatever for the offside
@@tomtou2867 yes they did the goalkeeper shot it
The first one is offside that's why referee didn't give a penalty.
mitoma it's regular. the ball is not completely off
Lo de cucurella no se pita por un fuera de juego y una mano previa...
Dejen de llorar😊😊😮
Creo q eres la única persona q lo ha visto graciaaas
Germany's attack is being in offside bruh😅
Yeah
Bro no füllkrug was not in offside
Got checked
Not
Enough saying this f***ing bs everywhere to defend that shitty ref decision
Jesus I don't even like Germany but did the ref know that it was an offside 2 seconds before that if no one official said anything about that? If it was offside why did he continue playing and gave a throw in not an offside?
Ref made a mistake, crucial one and didn't even check that afterwards
Fortunately Spain deserves to win but Germany doesn't deserve to lose either...
Only people who watched Spain vs Germany know how many times Spanish players dived
the thing is his hand was in an unnatural position even if he tried to move his hand the ball was going to fast
We want from UEFA pre-play the match between 🇩🇪and🇪🇸.
Even though it is a hand but as per rule It is not because he didn't did it purposely also Germany sucks
@@nevinbabu8405u suck even more GERMANY DESERVED A PEN ALSO U DO NOT KNOS HOS TO TYPE
So by that logic you can switch from football to basketball as long as you didn't do it on purpose? Per rule? 😂😂
@@justme66o He got in that position before the shot, plus there was a previous offside, so it was not handball, watch the game lil bro
@@nevinbabu8405 pero cundo se acerca a esa parte hay que tener la mano para tras y Alemania no apesta eres tú la que apesta porque ni kroos ni. Rudiger bajarían a tu nivel
It is also happens with indian football team in world cup qualifiers 😢 if it not happens india qualify for 3rd round
残念ですがサッカーはクリケットの様に簡単ではありません。
@@HuarU-sf3ej Fr fr
Average Indian Glazer crying about not qualifying for world cup even when 18 percent of the world population are Indian.
Like when you have 1.5 billion people in your country you would think you would actually have good players, but no. All you do is yap about how good Sunil Chetri is even though he is overrated.
@@that1diot651 arre when I say we have good players but we kick a goal again quatar but if these blind referees not present we qualify for 3rd round our players are good only need good coach okkk noob
he told us he is a Barca fan in 7053298 way
That was devil when he touch ballhand 😢
the first one was from Füllkrug offside and Handball before he pass to Musiala...
😊
He wasnt
@@Ultrabeast-ok2ouhe litteraly was
Spain Germany offside
この動画絶対ドイツの人つくったやん
That foul on Vini was a clear penalty
Like please, today is my birthday 🎉
Ale tak był spalony i strzelił w ręke
The first had an offside before the hand ball 🤦♂️
But FIFA protocol says that if a player has one arm in front of the offside line it does not count as an offside, so it was the referee's error, something else he interpreted as if it were glued arm So it was the referre's error.
@@fabiojuniordeoliveiragarbu5352 así y la jugada la continúan con un saqué de de banda 🤨
Did you read the “before”@@fabiojuniordeoliveiragarbu5352
People still don't understand that it WASN'T OFFSIDE and how offside works. It's offside if a part of the body that you're allowed to use to score a goal is behind the line. But it was the hand behind the line. You don't score goals with your hand. Unfair play. Spain used handball twice. Musiala was constantly fouled.
If you saw the love match you would’ve understood why the first one wasn’t handball
The first one may have cost Toni Kross their last euro
Como olvidar ese gol que le metió Japón injustamente a España
El VAR asegurará que el balón estaba en la línea. Es frustrante, pero hay que admitirlo.
En el fútbol también hay suerte.
@@user-ng6jw7wg6j ya
Germany one was offside , second one was robbery because there is no line goal tecnology in Spain , third one is clearly a penalty, and the fourth one is a roberry.
And the second one Germany against Spain when Füllkrug got wrestled down?? Still in „normal“ time.
Fue trampa queria que ganará Alemania 😢😢
@@jonathanziegler8601Carvajal got sent off, plus how did Kross not get a card at his first fault out of many in that game?
Answer: the ref Anthony Taylor had alr a bad rep for being a bad ref UEFA knew this and he still got the ref an important matche
Real fan
Fourth one was few milimeters in game you can see in the other angle
Because before euros all presidents of FIFA said if a player hand is down and hits Han its no a pen
I told my friend that the game will be very controversil because Anthony Taylor was the ref.. 🤣 From Kroos not getting a yellow and cucurella becoming the second goalkeeper and not receiving a pen.. man what a night
三苫のは正しい判定
If you say Cucurella made a handball, read the rulebook.
To everyone saying Füllkrug was offside with his hand they know nothing about football because there is a rule that you cannot be offside with the hand because you are not allowed to score with your hand and he didn't control with his arm,he controlled it with his shoulder.Anthony Taylor is because of this not allowed to be a ref in the Premier League anymore.He can only be ref in the lower leagues now because of that mistake
There are no controversial decisions in professional sports. its scripted who wins and who loses.
referee: money money money
In the first video, there is a rule by UEFA. when a player shoots towards the goal post and the defending player's hand touches the ball, if the defending player's hand is downwards and leaning behind the body, it won't be considered a hand ball.
It was also Posted on ESPN later.
Although this rule is to give some space to the defenders, it is a controversial rule.
The referee wasn't guilty.
His hand was going in words so there was no pen
bro said hitoma when its mitoma
And they say that Barça buys referees😓
The first one was correct because before the handball one of the German players were offside
I watched the full game
SPAAAAAAAAIIIIIIN
that's why I always said, there's no fair play in football!
They don't now how to reff fair things
India 🇮🇳 vs Qatar 🇶🇦 also one of them........😢💔
😂😂😂😂
it was handball by curcurrela but fullkrug was offside so it is ok but fifa said that if it touches ur hand in a natural position its no pen but germany v denmark the oen handball was naturall too and no one saw it
Chempion bulishga bazan hakamlar ham yordam beradi!
the first one was also correct, there was out of the previous game
Some actions are a giant disgrace
mates my cousion is a var manager he said its in
The foul was there and in last one the ball was in
first one had offside in the leadup
Japan vs Spain was my first game I watched on hilights and o thought it was out and it was but it goal 💀😭💀
I didn't listen to Anthony Taylor's excuse.
He did make a biggest mistake despite being VAR😢
In football if the attacker was running and have been touched and fell this is a penalty.
Remember 2014 World Cup final referee😅😅