The second incident seems to have been cut off before a proper explanation was given. The right engine failed, but the co-pilot misidentified it and told the captain the left engine was the one that failed. So they kept trying to use the damaged right engine to keep the plane in the air, while running the perfectly fine left engine at idle. The captain was preoccupied with the ATC communications and didn't put aside time to assess the situation (the ATC comms were pretty full-on), and didn't even get to complete that failure checklist they mentioned. Hence the crew management failure black mark. Also the co-pilot only received minor injuries.
No mention of engine failures in report ? Seems the ATC kept asking the same questions, even as she confirmed she had a good understanding. How many times did she ask how many on board. ?
@@donfisher8035 "The teardown of the right engine showed that two high-pressure turbine stage 1 blades were missing their outer spans... The blade failures caused downstream (secondary) damage to the low-pressure turbine, resulting in a loss of thrust..." All there in the report.
Come on guys! Channel quality is going down the tubes! You guys are better than that and you’ve got an awesome channel! You don’t have 1.5 million subs for nothing! You can do it!
@ko7577The engine failure was attributed to oxidation and corossion within two engine high-pressure turbine blades causing stress fractures and subsequent breakage. The breakage caused secondary damage to the low-pressure turbine resulting in loss of thrust. The pilots correctly identified a loss of thrust in the #2 (right) engine at the time of takeoff.
ATC in Honolulu was number one. So clear and emotional, the dialogue with the pilot seems taken from a movie. I'm glad the two guys survived. The two guys that flown a 45yo 737 as daily routine, just to remember.
they did said it could be volcanic ash but still have a ball to go through rather than change their direction, i dont know how airliner thinks can go full daredavil rather then use some fuel for direction change
@@althunder4269it’s not a weather radar, just regular radar. If the ussr could see the disintegration of a u2 at 70,000 feet you can bet modern airport radar can see ash
@@Scott1433 here’s the thing kid, you’re not the channel creator, so you don’t have any say in what or what doesn’t get produced. If you want to whine, that’s fine, I guess, but it shows more about you than it does about him. It doesn’t matter if you perceive the “quality” has “gone down” or not because you’re not the end all be all, and neither is this loser who commented originally, buddy.
I hope you come up with new episodes soon and don’t just combine two older episodes into one. It’s just more entertaining seeing the newer episodes honestly.
I'm actually glad if he runs out of material 😅 that just means the sky is safer I'd rather get that and rewatch old episodes with better graphics and details
Did you ever start thinking that he has covered almost every single crash since he started a few years ago??? Stop complaining! I love every episode!❤️ If you don't like it, then offer the creator some suggestions!!
Finally, a story with a much happier ending. I know that planes crash with all souls lost; but, there should be MORE stories where the people survived. After a while, it's so depressing to read story after story where there were no survivors. I can't tell you how happy this story made me feel.
Sadly, the quality of the videos has been on a decline over the past few months. They feel rushed, endings are too abrupt, the explanations of accident causes are way too brief, editing became sloppy, subtitles are riddled with typos or distractingly illegible. I hope this channel recovers.
I agree, I've recently been rewatching older videos and the quality certainly used to be higher. The editing and overall production used to be much better that it is now. I still watch almost every upload, but there has been a noticable change in quality. I've no idea what the cause is and it's not for me to speculate on that, it could be personal issues that are obviously none of my business.
@@lenseofanomad "start your own channel" is a very poor argument. It's okay to have critisism, and he's not wrong, the quality has declined. Go back and watch uploads from a year ago and you'll see the difference.
@@lenseofanomad How does a channel die and the Creator has no idea why? The viewers don't say a word. They just stop watching. His feedback was critical and fair. It's folks like you that'd just let it die. Many comments here today speaking of the same defects that normally do not plague this otherwise great channel.
I agree! Allec Ibay's channel explains every detail, almost to a fault! AND he outlines his white lettering in black so you can see the letters no matter the background. This channel's quality has been lackluster lately and this video proves that perfectly.
Kudos to the air traffic controller for the 2nd story, her professional demeanor and quick correspondence with Coast Guard helped in saving two peoples' lives. I hope she's proud of herself.
Is there something personal going on with the flight channel guy? If thats the case then just let people know im sure they would understand. The recent videos just seem to be older episodes combined and put into a "new" video. Also the text needs a shadow or making black if its going to be on a white cloudy background. I feel like in the past this would never have been looked over. Also the video cuts off before the full explanation is given.
@@yno7396what is your problem. Are you the channel creators personal mouthpiece ? People are allowed to make observations about a channel. The quality has gone down, that's a fact. If I had a channel and people believed the quality had gone down, I'd want to hear those views. Your subscribers and audience are in essence your customers. No the channel creator doesn't need to answer anything, but people don't need your permission either to make an observation.
@@Scott1433 here’s the thing kid, you’re not the channel creator, so you don’t have any say in what or what doesn’t get produced. If you want to whine, that’s fine, I guess, but it shows more about you than it does about him. It doesn’t matter if you perceive the “quality” has “gone down” or not because you’re not the end all be all, and neither is this loser who commented originally, buddy.
Yes, I was unable to read it too....and I'm not a Karen, just stating it as fact so perhaps the content provider can make adjustments for next time rather than lose likes.
@@brailrice Dude is just trying to help out and give him some ideas for future videos and here you are acting like he insulted the mans ability to create these.
The end of the Rhoades 810 is cut off. I am also disappointed that the second video was combined with the KLM one. Should have been two separate videos.
Green Dot Aviation is an up and coming flight channel which I have gravitated to. Hard working owner with a great narration voice and good detail. I suppose owners of established channels either sell them to people trying to cash in and not uphold the quality, or the owners just lose their interest and passion a bit. It's kind of understandable, people's lives change.
yep, Green Dot Aviation is a good one. I also watch Mauricio PC, it's in spanish but somehow I still can follow. And Mauricio's english channel, MPC flight recreation, not updated as often but still great. He covers accidents that are not always so well known.. And of course I follow Chloe on Disaster Breakdown :)
An intense display of courage and professionalism under pressure. The crew of Road Express 810 showcased exceptional skill, navigating an unimaginable emergency. Truly a testament to the importance of training and quick decision-making in aviation. What a gripping story!
Have you ever considered doing Japan Airlines Flight 123? I’ve never seen you do it and I feel like it would be a nice new episode since you’ve never done it.
The thumbnail is an attention-grabbing one that appears to show the plane splashing into the ocean, building on the title of "Falling Fast into the Ocean", when in fact neither is true. The plane was never "falling". It was a huge glider once the engines failed, and the pilots' ability to land the plane-on an island hundreds of miles from any mainland *and* effectively level, not pointed down at a massive angle as shown in the thumbnail-is one of the greatest heroic efforts in modern aviation history.
losing all 4 engines at the same time ; I'm guessing even though there's training and checklists; that it's probably not something a pilot thinks will ever happen in real life - to face it in the cockpit must be insane
Your videos are usually well produced...this one has not lived up to your usual quality. Abrupt end to the video/not your usual outro. Also, you need to do what other videos of the same genre do and outline your white letters with a black outline, that way no matter the background the words can be seen. Can't see white letters against clouds in the sky! You guys are better than this 😮
@@danielperkins7311 hmm let’s see, does my channel name say “TheFlightChannel”? No, kiddo, didn’t think so, meaning I’m not the channel owner. What I’m saying is that no one in this comment section has any right to demand anything, it’s a public information UA-cam channel, not a subscription service you’re paying for, buddy. So get off your high horse or just don’t watch. Those are your two options and you will choose one and do as your told.
@@yno7396The way you talk to others just suggests you're a kid yourself. But anyway, they don't have the right to demand, but they do have the right to criticise it in hopes that Theflightchannel starts putting in actual effort again.
@@tomaskilian8489 giving you the cold hard truth and teaching you a lesson on respect and the world not revolving around you? That sounds more like I’m you’re daddy. But anyway, they and you can say whatever, son. TheFlightChannel can do whatever they want, and you can either cope or just humble yourself and get on, little buddy.
thanks. I just want to note that, when the background of the images in this video is white, there is no contrast between the letters of the subtitles and the background color of the image, making it difficult to read.
I ALWAYS fast forward about 10 seconds in from the beginning because you insist on putting the ending at the beginning. Its like the biggest SPOILER ALERT.
How sad it ended like that so close to an airport . That pilot stayed calm and focused bless him they must have been so scared ,not to mention the anxiety of the ACT .I'm glad they survived but such extreme injuries.
The controller did not understand that there was an emergency because the pilot did not use the codeword for emergency, which in the US is "We do not wish to declare at this time."
we have lost an engine is pretty much universal emergency language to me .. what are you smoking ??? we are going down needs a code ????? snap out of your pc world pal
I remember there being a lot more to the accident in the waters just outside of Honolulu. Wasn't there an actual problem with the plane due to its age? Something to that effect? The pilots then mismanaged the handling of the incident. Poor CRM. (And there was A LOT more regarding what caused a KLM plane to fly directly into a plume of volcanic ash! The story of that plane's survival is truly remarkable!)
I enjoyed the video TFC. I like the new style of video with dual stories, and to the point storylines. Don't let negetive feedback bother you too much, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Looking forward to the next one!
Recommend either a drop shadow or a shadow box for text going forward - great channel but pretty massive oversight Mentioned in comments of a lot of videos; please consider addressing it ❤
May I suggest you change the colour of the text in your videos because quite a few times it's impossible to read when its against the sky background because both the clouds and the text is white.
People keep saying the channel is dying. And it is. You know why? B/C air travel is getting safer. Can't come up with accident videos if there are no more accidents.
I guess the channel creator(s) are going through some difficulties. My suggestion would be to reduce the frequency of uploads if it helps maintain the quality. Make a declaration video on that so the viewers know. People watch you for the quality and effort you put into the videos, they would not mind fewer videos I think.
Likely had never flew through one before, or they’d be dead. Described it as a’cloud’ repeatedly. They didn’t know as much about effects on engines back then. This is how they found out. $80M is a good incentive to quickly learn. to learn.😮
part of the story is missing - according to the thread started by @shaydeNZ - "The right engine failed, but the co-pilot misidentified it and told the captain the left engine was the one that failed. So they kept trying to use the damaged right engine to keep the plane in the air, while running the perfectly fine left engine at idle."
Suggestion: Next video, Maybe you should try xplane instead. Because xplane has better crash effects, Like engine fires and etc, MSFS doesn't have those. Maybe you can try xplane for a bit and if you like it you can move there
The second incident seems to have been cut off before a proper explanation was given. The right engine failed, but the co-pilot misidentified it and told the captain the left engine was the one that failed. So they kept trying to use the damaged right engine to keep the plane in the air, while running the perfectly fine left engine at idle. The captain was preoccupied with the ATC communications and didn't put aside time to assess the situation (the ATC comms were pretty full-on), and didn't even get to complete that failure checklist they mentioned. Hence the crew management failure black mark. Also the co-pilot only received minor injuries.
This sounds like TransAsia Airways 235 where the crew misidentified the problem and shut down their only running engine.
No mention of engine failures in report ? Seems the ATC kept asking the same questions, even as she confirmed she had a good understanding. How many times did she ask how many on board. ?
@@donfisher8035 "The teardown of the right engine showed that two high-pressure turbine stage 1 blades were missing their outer spans... The blade failures caused downstream (secondary) damage to the low-pressure turbine, resulting in a loss of thrust..." All there in the report.
@@ShaydeNZ Okay. Both engines were missing spans ? Both failed, not at once.
@@donfisher8035 There was no failure on the left engine, just the right one. The left engine was fine. At least up until it went underwater...
Come on guys! Channel quality is going down the tubes! You guys are better than that and you’ve got an awesome channel! You don’t have 1.5 million subs for nothing! You can do it!
@rxw5520 Allec Joshua Ibay*
Not trying to be an ass I just want op to be able to find Allec's great channel
Been more about the churn snd less sbout the burn lately.
How was crew problems the reason for both engines dying in the Hawaii incident? It cut off before an explanation.
The captain misidentified the failing engine, increased power to that engine, and did not increase power to the other, properly functioning engine.
Thank you so much!!! Now I understand it. Happy and healthy New Year!@@HardCoreStefanO
@ko7577The engine failure was attributed to oxidation and corossion within two engine high-pressure turbine blades causing stress fractures and subsequent breakage. The breakage caused secondary damage to the low-pressure turbine resulting in loss of thrust. The pilots correctly identified a loss of thrust in the #2 (right) engine at the time of takeoff.
ATC in Honolulu was number one. So clear and emotional, the dialogue with the pilot seems taken from a movie. I'm glad the two guys survived.
The two guys that flown a 45yo 737 as daily routine, just to remember.
I dunno- she tells them to climb to 13,000 feet after they've declared an emergency. It sounded like she wasn't listening to them at first.
...one would think that with limited engine power, they would have stayed closer to the airport???
I absolutely didn't get that at all!!!!!@@wokewokerman5280
That was an abrupt ending. Is there a part 2 to give us your usual full explanation as to how it happened?
You can read the report. Basically they switched off the wrong engine afair
@@fellow7000oh is it why the other one was hot as said by the capt?
These videos are becoming more and more low quality. Couldn't even' read half the text in the first video.
Yes. Something changed on this channel.
No
You would think airlines would be highly aware of volcanic ash and avoid it like the plague.
It was the 1980’s. Idk if it would have shown up on radar.
They are, now.
they did said it could be volcanic ash but still have a ball to go through rather than change their direction, i dont know how airliner thinks can go full daredavil rather then use some fuel for direction change
Volcanic ash apparently doesn't show on radar because there is no moisture in it to reflect the radar signal back to the receiver.
@@althunder4269it’s not a weather radar, just regular radar. If the ussr could see the disintegration of a u2 at 70,000 feet you can bet modern airport radar can see ash
How was the second one attributed to their high work loads and stress? it seemed incomplete.
The captain misidentified the failing engine, increased power to that engine, and did not increase power to the other, properly functioning engine.
@@HardCoreStefanO thanks that was the info I wanted
Havent watched this channel in a while, it has clearly changed.
Relax, little man. The world doesn’t revolve around you.
@@yno7396what does this have to do with anything? he never said it did.
It's lazy and gone down the tubes. Green Dot Aviation, Mentour Pilot are much better alternatives now.
@@yno7396he was just making an observation and he has a point
@@Scott1433 here’s the thing kid, you’re not the channel creator, so you don’t have any say in what or what doesn’t get produced. If you want to whine, that’s fine, I guess, but it shows more about you than it does about him. It doesn’t matter if you perceive the “quality” has “gone down” or not because you’re not the end all be all, and neither is this loser who commented originally, buddy.
I hope you come up with new episodes soon and don’t just combine two older episodes into one. It’s just more entertaining seeing the newer episodes honestly.
That explains my case of deja vu!
Bloodthirsty
I'm actually glad if he runs out of material 😅 that just means the sky is safer
I'd rather get that and rewatch old episodes with better graphics and details
Did you ever start thinking that he has covered almost every single crash since he started a few years ago??? Stop complaining! I love every episode!❤️ If you don't like it, then offer the creator some suggestions!!
@@tracycolvin7789agreed!
Finally, a story with a much happier ending. I know that planes crash with all souls lost; but, there should be MORE stories where the people survived. After a while, it's so depressing to read story after story where there were no survivors. I can't tell you how happy this story made me feel.
Sadly, the quality of the videos has been on a decline over the past few months. They feel rushed, endings are too abrupt, the explanations of accident causes are way too brief, editing became sloppy, subtitles are riddled with typos or distractingly illegible. I hope this channel recovers.
okay, start your own channel
I agree, I've recently been rewatching older videos and the quality certainly used to be higher. The editing and overall production used to be much better that it is now. I still watch almost every upload, but there has been a noticable change in quality. I've no idea what the cause is and it's not for me to speculate on that, it could be personal issues that are obviously none of my business.
@@lenseofanomad "start your own channel" is a very poor argument. It's okay to have critisism, and he's not wrong, the quality has declined. Go back and watch uploads from a year ago and you'll see the difference.
@@lenseofanomad How does a channel die and the Creator has no idea why? The viewers don't say a word. They just stop watching. His feedback was critical and fair. It's folks like you that'd just let it die. Many comments here today speaking of the same defects that normally do not plague this otherwise great channel.
I agree! Allec Ibay's channel explains every detail, almost to a fault! AND he outlines his white lettering in black so you can see the letters no matter the background. This channel's quality has been lackluster lately and this video proves that perfectly.
Kudos to the air traffic controller for the 2nd story, her professional demeanor and quick correspondence with Coast Guard helped in saving two peoples' lives.
I hope she's proud of herself.
Is there something personal going on with the flight channel guy? If thats the case then just let people know im sure they would understand. The recent videos just seem to be older episodes combined and put into a "new" video. Also the text needs a shadow or making black if its going to be on a white cloudy background. I feel like in the past this would never have been looked over. Also the video cuts off before the full explanation is given.
He doesn’t have to do or explain anything to you, little man.
@@yno7396thank you warrior
Probably outsourcing...to China
@@yno7396what is your problem. Are you the channel creators personal mouthpiece ? People are allowed to make observations about a channel. The quality has gone down, that's a fact. If I had a channel and people believed the quality had gone down, I'd want to hear those views. Your subscribers and audience are in essence your customers. No the channel creator doesn't need to answer anything, but people don't need your permission either to make an observation.
@@Scott1433 here’s the thing kid, you’re not the channel creator, so you don’t have any say in what or what doesn’t get produced. If you want to whine, that’s fine, I guess, but it shows more about you than it does about him. It doesn’t matter if you perceive the “quality” has “gone down” or not because you’re not the end all be all, and neither is this loser who commented originally, buddy.
White colored text against white cloud background was not a good choice 😒😒
Good afternoon, Karen!
I was thinking the same thing actually.
Yes, I was unable to read it too....and I'm not a Karen, just stating it as fact so perhaps the content provider can make adjustments for next time rather than lose likes.
They’ve done this a few times lately and it’s annoying
@@pigs6486calling out an error doesn’t make someone a Karen, kid. Go take a nap.
Please do the 2024 JAL 516 collision.
That’s my favorite!!!
@@brailrice Bro it just happened two days ago
@@heathj7794LMAO
My goodness these planes are Huge !!!!
Is this another repeat shown as a new upload?
Yes unfortunately
The professionalism and relative lack of panic maintained by the pilots of Rhoades 810 to the very end is admirable.
Pilots are trained to not panic. To keep trying until the end. Never give up.
@@alanhinkel420 Unlike the first pilot who was clearly panicking
@@evs251 Yeah, she was probably a little scared.
@@evs251 of course, it was a woman. Never board a plane with a woman piloting or as 1st officer.
A little bit of panic might have helped them complete the failure checklist!
Three accidents you could cover in the future :
-Avianca 11
-Air algerie 5017
-Transasia 222
@@brailrice Dude is just trying to help out and give him some ideas for future videos and here you are acting like he insulted the mans ability to create these.
@@brailriceI think he gave suggestions because I swear I’ve seen these before
And the idiots in the Japan CG plane that didn't heed the Hold Short order
@@brailrice brotha I was just suggesting some ideas 💀
Also Korean air had a DC-10 crash in 1989 that almost no one talks about
Grateful that both had happy endings, but disturbed that either of these happened in the first place
This video cut off before your explanation of what happened. I think you need to upload it again.
The end of the Rhoades 810 is cut off. I am also disappointed that the second video was combined with the KLM one. Should have been two separate videos.
Green Dot Aviation is an up and coming flight channel which I have gravitated to. Hard working owner with a great narration voice and good detail. I suppose owners of established channels either sell them to people trying to cash in and not uphold the quality, or the owners just lose their interest and passion a bit. It's kind of understandable, people's lives change.
yep, Green Dot Aviation is a good one. I also watch Mauricio PC, it's in spanish but somehow I still can follow. And Mauricio's english channel, MPC flight recreation, not updated as often but still great. He covers accidents that are not always so well known.. And of course I follow Chloe on Disaster Breakdown :)
@@TheRealNatNat Chloe's good. Keen and innovative.
An intense display of courage and professionalism under pressure. The crew of Road Express 810 showcased exceptional skill, navigating an unimaginable emergency. Truly a testament to the importance of training and quick decision-making in aviation. What a gripping story!
What a genius idea to put white text over white background.
I'm grateful for these free videos.
Have you ever considered doing Japan Airlines Flight 123? I’ve never seen you do it and I feel like it would be a nice new episode since you’ve never done it.
Great video and I'm soooo glad they all made it!!!
Kind of a let down after all that drama.
That's when EVERY pilot/co-pilot says to themselves; "They don't pay me enough for this".
The thumbnail is an attention-grabbing one that appears to show the plane splashing into the ocean, building on the title of "Falling Fast into the Ocean", when in fact neither is true. The plane was never "falling". It was a huge glider once the engines failed, and the pilots' ability to land the plane-on an island hundreds of miles from any mainland *and* effectively level, not pointed down at a massive angle as shown in the thumbnail-is one of the greatest heroic efforts in modern aviation history.
That first officer was panicking quite rapidly, damn....
it was much better when you uploaded each story separately! The white text on the white clouds are illigible.
Are these just re runs of your previous videos? 🤔
Really sad how this channel is declining in quality and reuploading old episodes constantly
Don’t watch then, little man.
@@yno7396 gonna cry?
@@dannyadams2211 no, but you can cope and seethe or leave and you will do as you’re told, little man. Otherwise you can cry
Holy cow!!! What's with the white colored captions on the white clouds. Suddenly this channel turned in another direction...hmmm
Ima sound crazy but the fear in the female pilots voice was unlike anything I’ve heard before
It was definitely jolting but she probably thought she was watching her own death unfolding before her eyes. I can't really blame her.
losing all 4 engines at the same time ; I'm guessing even though there's training and checklists; that it's probably not something a pilot thinks will ever happen in real life - to face it in the cockpit must be insane
They still managed to land the plane safely. Fear or no fear
Menopause
Your videos are usually well produced...this one has not lived up to your usual quality. Abrupt end to the video/not your usual outro. Also, you need to do what other videos of the same genre do and outline your white letters with a black outline, that way no matter the background the words can be seen. Can't see white letters against clouds in the sky! You guys are better than this 😮
And who are you to demand anything, little man?
Are you the channel owner? Because for everyone offering criticism to the new videos you respond to them and just call them "little man." @yno7396
@@danielperkins7311 hmm let’s see, does my channel name say “TheFlightChannel”? No, kiddo, didn’t think so, meaning I’m not the channel owner. What I’m saying is that no one in this comment section has any right to demand anything, it’s a public information UA-cam channel, not a subscription service you’re paying for, buddy. So get off your high horse or just don’t watch. Those are your two options and you will choose one and do as your told.
@@yno7396The way you talk to others just suggests you're a kid yourself. But anyway, they don't have the right to demand, but they do have the right to criticise it in hopes that Theflightchannel starts putting in actual effort again.
@@tomaskilian8489 giving you the cold hard truth and teaching you a lesson on respect and the world not revolving around you? That sounds more like I’m you’re daddy. But anyway, they and you can say whatever, son. TheFlightChannel can do whatever they want, and you can either cope or just humble yourself and get on, little buddy.
You should make a video on JAL 516 runway collision. It just happened recently.
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this one again… makes me wonder: is the FC out of incidents? Anyway my 6year old son will appreciate the “new” episode
Could have done with a bit more on the cause of the second accident.
thanks. I just want to note that, when the background of the images in this video is white, there is no contrast between the letters of the subtitles and the background color of the image, making it difficult to read.
Who was the brillant mind who decided to put white text on scenes with white clouds???
So glad everyone survived. The two pilots injured was bad, but they recovered. Thank you for another great presentation. Happy New Year!!
I ALWAYS fast forward about 10 seconds in from the beginning because you insist on putting the ending at the beginning. Its like the biggest SPOILER ALERT.
Yes, I agree with you. I don't want to click to the website immediately as I know the outcome is the beginning. I liked it better how it used to be.
agree. He was told before and stopped doing it for a while, unfortunately it's back. Very irritating.
what a sloppy ending to your video, it just shuts off. You've become complacent.
Says the guy who can’t bother to put a damn shirt on.
@@brailrice dont glaze TFC doesn’t even care about you
Why starts every video the last time with an old video we already have seen once? 🤔
How sad it ended like that so close to an airport . That pilot stayed calm and focused bless him they must have been so scared ,not to mention the anxiety of the ACT .I'm glad they survived but such extreme injuries.
they were idiots--should have returned right away but figured they had to run their check lists --me,i am getting down
Has this TheFlightChannel been sold to a new owner? 😧
Thank you for these amazing videos.
The controller did not understand that there was an emergency because the pilot did not use the codeword for emergency, which in the US is "We do not wish to declare at this time."
we have lost an engine is pretty much universal emergency language to me .. what are you smoking ??? we are going down needs a code ????? snap out of your pc world pal
I had a lot of trouble reading some of the text just FYI, it bled in with the clouds.
Lazy upload.
Then don't watch video
@@DarrenIsaac-kp5ys I wouldn't know how it is until I watch it. 😉
I swear ive seen this before is this a reupload tf😂
Yeah a lot of the "new" videos are just older episodes combined
I remember there being a lot more to the accident in the waters just outside of Honolulu. Wasn't there an actual problem with the plane due to its age? Something to that effect? The pilots then mismanaged the handling of the incident. Poor CRM. (And there was A LOT more regarding what caused a KLM plane to fly directly into a plume of volcanic ash! The story of that plane's survival is truly remarkable!)
This is a old one but still a great upload...volcanic ash is terrible
Can you do Pulkovo aviation enterprise flight 612 next?
well you didnt care much on the second video LOL
As a passenger that had to have been so scary.
Terrain, terrain, Flight Channel, pull up, pull up.
Have you done anything on Bagram Air Force Base?
I enjoyed the video TFC. I like the new style of video with dual stories, and to the point storylines. Don't let negetive feedback bother you too much, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Looking forward to the next one!
Great video!
What was the cause of the second accident ?
How did you get the Boeing 737 100 or 200?
The KLM flight disregarded controller warnings and a NOTAM specifically warning them not to fly thru the ash plume. You forgot to cover that part.
You have to do the JAL 516 collision
I really don't like how TheFlightChannel shows the end at the beginning of the videos now.
Who was the brillant mind who decided to put white text on scenes with white clouds??? I can't see shit
How about those Pratt and Whitney PW4000s firing back up after clear of the ash. Tons of damage. but got them to the ground safe.
Pls cover the recent plane fire in japan
Recommend either a drop shadow or a shadow box for text going forward - great channel but pretty massive oversight
Mentioned in comments of a lot of videos; please consider addressing it ❤
Was there any way to avoid flying through a Volcano's ash cloud??
It seems step one is knowing that's what it is. Seems very odd no one told them about that.
May I suggest you change the colour of the text in your videos because quite a few times it's impossible to read when its against the sky background because both the clouds and the text is white.
Why the reruns?
👎👎👎
When’s the breakdown of Japan Airlines Flight 516?
Dear sir,
Can I post your video on my channel giving your credit?
Why the abrupt ending though?
At an HEB in McKinney, Texas
Cool story brah
People keep saying the channel is dying. And it is. You know why? B/C air travel is getting safer. Can't come up with accident videos if there are no more accidents.
For REAL
Can't read white on white. Wish the UA-camrs understood this.
cant see many of the narrative as it blends in to the background
Thank God for a safe landing... those pilots are heros.
Can you do eastern air 21
bro i don't know why ur recycling content... we need NEW stuff
I fear flying yet I'm stuck watching every new video FC drops....😔
Well, how is this your interested in yet you're not. You know you should go flying right?
Why fear flying? Safer than a car
can you do the japan collision that happened a few days ago
Read the Wikipedia on the second accident. It gives you more detail.
I guess the channel creator(s) are going through some difficulties. My suggestion would be to reduce the frequency of uploads if it helps maintain the quality. Make a declaration video on that so the viewers know. People watch you for the quality and effort you put into the videos, they would not mind fewer videos I think.
TFC probably is taking notes to make the video about JAL 516 now...
Why would they fly through a black volcanic ash cloud?
Likely had never flew through one before, or they’d be dead. Described it as a’cloud’ repeatedly. They didn’t know as much about effects on engines back then. This is how they found out. $80M is a good incentive to quickly learn. to learn.😮
For the second accident:
What do you mean by poor CRM? The pilots did well under the circumstances. They didn't have the altitude to work with.
part of the story is missing - according to the thread started by @shaydeNZ - "The right engine failed, but the co-pilot misidentified it and told the captain the left engine was the one that failed. So they kept trying to use the damaged right engine to keep the plane in the air, while running the perfectly fine left engine at idle."
Great Video as always, what are youre specs?
I feel like maybe the wrong video file was uploaded.
Make a short video and simulate JAL flight whether seen dash or not???❤
Looking forward for video recreation of JAL 156 recent accident.
It is Jal flight 516, no offense.
do a video on the Haneda Collision. you used to be so fast in bringing us analysis
the officials are only starting the analysis - and probably will take months - why would this channel be reporting on it
Not the video anyone was waiting for…
So what caused the engine failures??
Can you make a video about the Crash in Hanneda just few days ago pls , i think more people want to understand what happen with that A350.
What does the first flight have to do with the second one in this video?!!!
An a350 collided with a Q300 at Tokyo not to long ago
Suggestion: Next video, Maybe you should try xplane instead. Because xplane has better crash effects, Like engine fires and etc, MSFS doesn't have those.
Maybe you can try xplane for a bit and if you like it you can move there