Thank you so much. The third order suddenly popped up in linear control systems and I couldn't figure out how to solve for the frequency and damp factor. This video helped me out immensely.
I want to congratulate your effort for make and share this cleary explanation. It was very useful because I was looking for an example about analysis of the transient response of third order systems and here it is. Have a nice day.
i found this very helpful in understanding what is happening, i have a question though, your TF=1/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) how would changing the numerator effect this for example (s+2)/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) ?
@@scorpus_gaming You would do the same process as in the video, however because you now have a zero (through the s in the numerator) you are going to introduce some additional error to your analysis. However, if you're doing it manually, you're just going to have to accept that (but you can roughly assess the extent of the impact based on how close the zero is to the imaginary axis - similar to the 5x rule for poles).
Thank you so much. The third order suddenly popped up in linear control systems and I couldn't figure out how to solve for the frequency and damp factor. This video helped me out immensely.
This is miracle. I couldn't find any videos about multiple poles
I want to congratulate your effort for make and share this cleary explanation. It was very useful because I was looking for an example about analysis of the transient response of third order systems and here it is. Have a nice day.
What to do if all the p values is real?
I don't know you but i say to you that you are the only one of which i did subscribe because my heart 💖 was stop to your chanel
That indeed was really helpful. Thank you
Could your or anyone tell me to what is this function transfer related to? I just need it to going further with some practice classes.
She standard form of second order transfer
I can hear you for all day 😌
What do i do if Second order dominance isn't true?
Thank you!
If there is a K/{(s+a)(s^2+bs+c)} transfer function,
If we ignore the s=-a pole(a>0), can we consider it K/{a*(s^2+bs+c)}?
Helped a lot, thank you...
i found this very helpful in understanding what is happening, i have a question though, your TF=1/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) how would changing the numerator effect this for example (s+2)/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) ?
how do i solve that when the assumption is not valid?, thank you.
thank you very clear
thanks for the explanation.
I need ask you a question (control system)
How can call with you ??
Pro
Thanks a lot
what if the validity is equal to 5 ?
❤
I want to learn MATLAB in depth , can you suggest from where should start or from where should I take a course on it?
There are many materials on Lynda if you have access to that. There's also Matlab Onramp courses available through Mathworks.
Must P/Wn(Zeta) always be greater than 5?
If you are assuming dominance of the second order component (as is the case here) then the answer is yes for the assumption to be considered valid.
Thanks! I guess my course work result was false then.
i need a general form for 3 rd order please
بتعمل ايه هنا يا اسطا ؟
دا اليوتيوب دا طلع اوضتين وصالة ^_^
What if their is equation at numerator
I'm not sure what you mean. Sorry.
@@theryderproject5053( s+7)/(s^3+8s^2+6s) how to get damping ratio and natural frequency
@@scorpus_gaming You would do the same process as in the video, however because you now have a zero (through the s in the numerator) you are going to introduce some additional error to your analysis. However, if you're doing it manually, you're just going to have to accept that (but you can roughly assess the extent of the impact based on how close the zero is to the imaginary axis - similar to the 5x rule for poles).
Thank you!!!