Seth Lloyd: Quantum Machine Learning

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @derstreber2
    @derstreber2 10 років тому +37

    26:10
    "I hope everybody is hearing these questions. These are all extreamly important questions."
    I am crying inside right now.

    • @depthoffield4744
      @depthoffield4744 9 років тому

      Why?

    • @2LegHumanist
      @2LegHumanist 9 років тому +3

      Quetzalcoatl Because they were completely inaudible!

    • @depthoffield4744
      @depthoffield4744 9 років тому

      2LegHumanist oh, lol

    • @firefly618
      @firefly618 8 років тому +1

      Between this and the old-fashioned whiteboard (with small-tip pens too) I'm gonna rate the production of this video 1 star out of 5. You can do better, Google.

  • @Mithon81
    @Mithon81 10 років тому +18

    These silent question-pauses are making me nutts.. Wish Google would bother with microphones or at least texting the questions into their videos.

  • @AutFaciam
    @AutFaciam 10 років тому +9

    - He considers himself a quantum mechanic.
    - Your quanta are broken, we fix them.
    The guy is fantastic :)

  • @Midazc
    @Midazc 10 років тому +3

    After Seth mentions the footnote from the 1929 paper, about alpha²+beta² = 1, thinking about complex numbers, it comes to mind that he is actually talking about the unit circle. As the total probability is always 1 or 100%, the radius of the complex number representing the total probability of the qubit being 0 or 1 needs to be 1, hence the unit circle, hence the quadratic members.

  • @sabyasachimukhopadhyay1256
    @sabyasachimukhopadhyay1256 5 років тому +1

    Very very lucid talk by legendary Seth Llyod! Unfortunately the queries by audiences are not audible.

  • @katrinaburch4752
    @katrinaburch4752 10 років тому +4

    Summary at 57:33

  • @firefly618
    @firefly618 8 років тому +3

    You'd hope Google, of all companies, would bring an electronic whiteboard for the guy to use, so that it can be projected overhead and shown clearly in the video. But nope.

  • @vileguile4
    @vileguile4 10 років тому

    I wonder what the microphone in the middle is for.... :p
    thank you :) thanks for teaching!

  • @RafaelRodrigues-rx9ry
    @RafaelRodrigues-rx9ry 5 років тому +1

    That whiteboard looks like the Moses Tablets.

  • @MichaelYork777
    @MichaelYork777 10 років тому

    It would seem we have moved to mapping interference patterns
    as Quantum Symphonies. representing Complex Systems.

  • @CraigTalbert
    @CraigTalbert 10 років тому +1

    "Seth Lloyd visited the Quantum AI Lab at Google LA" //Quantum AI labs are so trendy these days.

  • @katrinaburch4752
    @katrinaburch4752 10 років тому

    "I'll address this in a bit." -SL

  • @kaiwang2924
    @kaiwang2924 6 років тому

    What a pity that we can not hear the questions.

  • @jnxmaster
    @jnxmaster 10 років тому

    Very interesting talk, too bad you couldn't hear the questions.

  • @atallguynh
    @atallguynh 6 років тому

    A lot of misinformation on this one... Prime example, the James Brown quote isn't from a concert, it's the intro to "Make It Funky":
    (Bobby:)
    What you gonna play now?
    (James:)
    Bobby, I don't know. But whatever I play, its got to be funky!
    (Bobby:)
    Yeah

  • @salteris
    @salteris 10 років тому +1

    Lol, it's like hearing 42 over and over again. We get the answers, but not the questions.

  • @Jimmy-B-
    @Jimmy-B- 6 років тому

    Are these the same talks?

  • @looni3
    @looni3 10 років тому

    Pretty sure at 58:35 and 58:37 he is saying "Graphene" not "Graphing"

  • @MrTweetyhack
    @MrTweetyhack 8 років тому

    Haha. QM is based on an equation that "Nobody Knows"? I think I'll just move over to polytheism now.

  • @shashibhushanagnihotri1916
    @shashibhushanagnihotri1916 10 років тому

    missed all the questions

  • @laexpearl
    @laexpearl 10 років тому

    2:18

  • @godbennett
    @godbennett 9 років тому

    how lissom this is :)

    • @godbennett
      @godbennett 9 років тому

      x.y wherein y is logorithmic, O(nlgn) is more precise.
      That lgn though, is perhaps in-accountable betwixt the total outcome that is the compression displacement range

  • @jameswest4700
    @jameswest4700 10 років тому +1

    All I want to know is d wave full of shit or not

    • @jameswest4700
      @jameswest4700 10 років тому

      Well Ive heard seth loyd say he doesnt see how the couldve built a true quantum computer. But Ive looked up alot about it and it seems to a layman like me they have. But mr loyd has said the largest calculation he can make his do is multiplying 3x5. Seth Loyd has said he doesnt believe they have built a true quantum computer. Im a little confused.

  • @DubezOniner
    @DubezOniner 10 років тому

    this guy might be a genius but he has the most annoying laugh I've ever heard