Michel Foucault's "What is Enlightenment?"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
- In this episode, I present Michel Foucault's "What is Enlightenment?"
If you want to support me, you can do that with these links:
Patreon: / theoryandphilosophy
paypal.me/theoryphilosophy
IG: @theory_and_philosophy
Podbean: theoretician.p...
Really enjoying your channel, i've been watching "Plastic Pills", "Then & Now" and "CCK philosophy", all of you are doing a great job at a time the public need to access these idea's and perspectives. Keep up the good work!
as a PhD student who has to teach some of this stuff but hasn't got time to do the reading (and I'm not paid enough to do it anyway lmao) you are a literal life saver.
This channel is great, glad I found this!
I've got to thank you for your video "What is Enlightenment?" which is really enlightening.
I've been listening to these videos in the background on autoplay without seeing the titles and I assumed at first that foucault was a Japanese guy named fukou
Very detailed explanation on the Enlightenment by Foucault.
Enlightenment means to break free.
For film theory check out Paul Schrader's Transcendental Style 1972 videos about Enlightenment. Visual approache. Good vid
This made way more sense than the book
could you do some on durkheim
loved it. As a Foucault fanboy you nailed it.
Brilliant as always.
thank you sir😊
Do you have transcripts available on Patreon or anywhere else? Thank-you, John
thank U
It is like jail break ie enlightenment
You think we could ever get a bookshelf tour? I for one always love to get a look at some more potential reading material; perhaps we might receive some brief insights on some of them if you were to oblige.
As always, love the videos. Channels like this keep me engaged.
Hi thank you! What Kind of microphone and recording do u use?
if only we thus embraced possibility
what do you record with
I hate how Foucault deconstructs Kant's text and even says that we might never mature, but then just reaffirms his ideals, as if saying "real enlightenment has never been tries".
God nerfed Foucault because if he went in the Sorelian direction he would have been too OP.
Nice moment to post this video xd
i like your doorknob
👽👍👽👍👽👍👍👽👽👽👽👽👍
im eating the same stuff im made out off. (flesh) (that bad thing we all do)
i dont like to be told i cant eat that. (im a carnivore) (who iam)
im created the same as an animal is. (how i was made)
im 90% instinct and emotion. (how i mostly react)
those 2 points where enlightening for me.
god does not eternally torture people, there is no hell.
or god would be a bad person. (theology)
hell is man made.
im pre programmed to not kill myself. (programmer)
hell is not beuty,beuty is beuty. (painter)
the laid way:
somehow the way knows i disagree with my current situation...(philosophy)
like it knows I do not want to walk that path, they laid before me.
but i smell dirt.....its all kinda strange.
do i go left or right?
is ego the way? is my way the way?
do i follow the dirt?
or do i lay my own way.
He doesn't understand traditionalism and its true perception of the past.
Modernism just seems like the ultimate futile deconstruction game.
0i
That got a bit wordy. Perhaps enlightenment is too difficult a picture to paint.
the essay is quite a good and well argued outline. Of course there are different perspectives but I have never heard a better one than foucault's