How about dealing with the root cause? These cases r not based on lies. Should your department not focus on improving care so that these events do not occur. The parents of those children are destroyed. Some end up with divorce.,The whole family dynamic is altered forever. The way this is presented seems uncaring towards the ones that have been harmed.
I really hope the family appeals for the ffg reasons: 1) They did not give the family a choice in the aftercare services that will be required by the child for life. They're simply saying, here's 15 percent of what you're asking, now go to another government medical facility appointed by us. Your kid isn't worth private healthcare. 2) It doesn't take into account loss of earnings had that child not been affected by negligent state doctors and pain and suffering incurred. To the child as well as family. 3) it doesn't take into account that not everyone will have access to facilities like this countrywide. I mean this is just a child's cerebral palsy case. Medical negligence is a broad field, you cannot just enforce a new law to cover an entire spectrum of injuries/negligence. 3) It doesn't take into account that this law would also affect claims against private malpractice. Private doctors have insurance against malpractice that we indirectly contribute to. What becomes good for the gander becomes good for the goose, all because of an unconstitutionally incorrect law. Trust me. There will be people who rightfully take it all the way to the Constitutional Court.
How about dealing with the root cause? These cases r not based on lies. Should your department not focus on improving care so that these events do not occur. The parents of those children are destroyed. Some end up with divorce.,The whole family dynamic is altered forever. The way this is presented seems uncaring towards the ones that have been harmed.
I really hope the family appeals for the ffg reasons:
1) They did not give the family a choice in the aftercare services that will be required by the child for life. They're simply saying, here's 15 percent of what you're asking, now go to another government medical facility appointed by us. Your kid isn't worth private healthcare.
2) It doesn't take into account loss of earnings had that child not been affected by negligent state doctors and pain and suffering incurred. To the child as well as family.
3) it doesn't take into account that not everyone will have access to facilities like this countrywide. I mean this is just a child's cerebral palsy case. Medical negligence is a broad field, you cannot just enforce a new law to cover an entire spectrum of injuries/negligence.
3) It doesn't take into account that this law would also affect claims against private malpractice. Private doctors have insurance against malpractice that we indirectly contribute to. What becomes good for the gander becomes good for the goose, all because of an unconstitutionally incorrect law.
Trust me. There will be people who rightfully take it all the way to the Constitutional Court.
2.1 Million is a joke.
How many Cuban doctors involved.