144Hz Vs 240Hz Gaming | Which Refresh Rate is Better?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • 144hz Vs. 240hz is a debate that comes with multiple conclusions and for good reasons. If you’re a gamer looking for an upgrade, should you go for a 240hz monitor, or would a 144hz monitor get the job done?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***Intro, Outro & Animation Credit:
    10.Studio swiy.co/credit...
    ***Music Source:
    UA-cam Audio Library
    ***Video Source:
    ‪@LGGlobal‬
    ‪@MSI‬
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    ***Disclaimer: The following video abides by the UA-cam Community Guideline. Footage used in this video is for educational purposes and all the information covered in this video was collected from unofficial sources and assumptions.
    ***Footage, music, images, and graphics used in the video falls under the UA-cam Fair Usage Policy Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. If you have any copyright issues, please contact us.
    ***All Affiliated links in the video description help us support this channel.
    #monitor #144hz #240hz

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @NeroRedgraveXIII
    @NeroRedgraveXIII 5 місяців тому +8

    Simple... If you have a System, that can run Games with over 200 FPS, buy a 240hz Monitor. Otherwise buy a 140hz one, limit the FPS to 140 and be happy.

  • @mhult5873
    @mhult5873 2 місяці тому +2

    Well... my computer (and any modern computer) can put out 240+ hz at 4k/1440p in the windows desktop, when browsing, using office-programs etc. I wonder: is there a difference between 240 hz and 144 hz in these applications?
    Because there sure were when I went from 60 hz to 144 hz.

  • @elementskater1010
    @elementskater1010 5 місяців тому +1

    got a 165hz monitor myself and im perfectly happy with it, i dont see a need for 240hz unless you game esports constantly.

    • @chaniibak7702
      @chaniibak7702 5 місяців тому

      To be fair, you’d probably be happy with anything above 100hz

    • @elementskater1010
      @elementskater1010 5 місяців тому

      @@chaniibak7702 for sure, it's nice and smooth enough for me lol no need to spend that much more on a 240hz

    • @Techfluencer
      @Techfluencer  5 місяців тому

      And then we have 500Hz monitors!

  • @arthurarturo4625
    @arthurarturo4625 3 місяці тому +1

    thanks for the video!
    I think I will got with 144Hz and prioritize 2k and 4k quality, then a 240hz full HD for example
    I think from the moment you get a 25 inch or bigger screen you need 2K resolution, and from 30inch you need 4k

  • @kennnyau2455
    @kennnyau2455 3 місяці тому +3

    Kids like let's play 250hz on 1080 trash instead of 180hz on 1440p

    • @yudeisylago407
      @yudeisylago407 2 місяці тому +1

      You see your wrong because for competitive games 250hz with 1080p is good but for story games and non competitive games 1440p 180hz is good / btw I rather go with 250hz 1080p

    • @CarlosReyes-q2z
      @CarlosReyes-q2z 2 місяці тому +1

      @@kennnyau2455 250hz on 1080p can really help in competitive gaming, which is why people make the choice over 1440 or 4k at a lower refresh rate.

  • @CarlosReyes-q2z
    @CarlosReyes-q2z 3 місяці тому +1

    I dont know what to do, i want to be able to do 4k 144hz on my monitor. But i also want to do 240hz 1080p on my computer.

    • @yudeisylago407
      @yudeisylago407 2 місяці тому

      If you play competitive games go with 240hz

    • @GigaGoku69420
      @GigaGoku69420 Місяць тому

      There are dual band monitors that do this but the cheapest Costs 1200€ :/

    • @CarlosReyes-q2z
      @CarlosReyes-q2z Місяць тому

      @@yudeisylago407 I play both comp games and regular, slow paced games

    • @CarlosReyes-q2z
      @CarlosReyes-q2z Місяць тому

      @@GigaGoku69420at that price id just get the lg 4k 240hz oled

  • @manhdepzai2k3
    @manhdepzai2k3 5 місяців тому +1

    help me choose between lg 32gr93u vs lg 27gr95qe, both of them are about the same price at my region

    • @usecode_guest
      @usecode_guest 5 місяців тому

      probably the first one since even though the refresh rate is worse its not oled, which means the screen wont burn in

    • @bal7ha2ar
      @bal7ha2ar 5 місяців тому +2

      ​@@usecode_guest but oled looks so good bro. also its gotten harder and harder to actually damage the oled panel, if you just watch out a bit there shouldnt be an issue.

    • @bal7ha2ar
      @bal7ha2ar 5 місяців тому +1

      you should go for the secon option imo. 1440p 240hz is the perfect sweetspot in my opinion and oled simply looks incredible. you just have to watch out a bit to not damage it, a screen saver should do the trick tho. of you want a bigger panel 32" vs 27" or want 4k buy the first one.

    • @stephenmeinhold5452
      @stephenmeinhold5452 5 місяців тому

      if its for gameing look for the fastest response time and for that it would have to be OLED.

    • @stephenmeinhold5452
      @stephenmeinhold5452 5 місяців тому

      @@usecode_guest burn in is a thing of the past Linus tek has proven that. even the steam deck is now OLED.

  • @kasunyip4676
    @kasunyip4676 5 місяців тому +2

    FIRST COMMENT

  • @KindaL0ndofns
    @KindaL0ndofns 5 місяців тому +1

    Second Comment :)

  • @ivanildo9579
    @ivanildo9579 5 місяців тому +1

    Third comment

  • @shabutii
    @shabutii 4 місяці тому

    AI garbage