His examples boiled down to "tactics are often vital" Yep. Sure. Part of modelling is the tactics, and if you are somehow ignoring everything BUT the tactics, then you likely don't know what you are doing. Most people wish to model high performers and the tactics are obvious. Any sort of consistent results with them are often nearly impossible without aspects of the behavior/beliefs/VAK strategies.
Is this critical theory creep I'm detecting here? Even from NLP standards, this fits deletion distortion and generalizing in it's framing. All Models are lies - It sounds like he's arguing something no one I've known whose ever worked with NLP modeling is saying. It's like saying "all measuring tapes are lies" If you insist they are accurate to the nearest picometer then yes sure. But no one was ever arguing that.
I hear you. It could seem that way. Generalization, deletion and distortion are part and parcel of language. Abstraction is necessary in order to move shift, rotate and constellate ideas sometimes. Imo. And theory can seem useless when the original referents are missing.
When will the CITADEL program be available to purchase once more?
Nice hook 🪝. Good to see you back
His examples boiled down to "tactics are often vital" Yep. Sure. Part of modelling is the tactics, and if you are somehow ignoring everything BUT the tactics, then you likely don't know what you are doing.
Most people wish to model high performers and the tactics are obvious. Any sort of consistent results with them are often nearly impossible without aspects of the behavior/beliefs/VAK strategies.
Your maker
Ask derren brown and Richard bandler lol
I'm enki I AM THE MODEL
Is this critical theory creep I'm detecting here? Even from NLP standards, this fits deletion distortion and generalizing in it's framing.
All Models are lies - It sounds like he's arguing something no one I've known whose ever worked with NLP modeling is saying.
It's like saying "all measuring tapes are lies" If you insist they are accurate to the nearest picometer then yes sure. But no one was ever arguing that.
I hear you. It could seem that way.
Generalization, deletion and distortion are part and parcel of language.
Abstraction is necessary in order to move shift, rotate and constellate ideas sometimes. Imo.
And theory can seem useless when the original referents are missing.