@@SeventhSeraphOfficerRevolver As would every other ancient civilization in the world. Though it should be noted chinese dragons aren't actually dragons, that's just what their called cause of the british.
Couple of things. Firstly, technically weyerns (*wyvern) are dragons, just not dragon dragons. The closest real life example would be that panda's are a type of bear, or that all thumbs are finger's, but not all fingers are thumbs. Also, it is theoretically possible for a creature to breath fire. Various theoretically methods have been thought up, ranging from producing some form of chemical which ignites when it comes into contact with air that is then sprayed out by the dragon, to the dragon having some form of shock organ similar to an electric eel, and produces some substance which can be ignited via a spark, to the dragon producing two chemicals which ignite when mixed together, and it sprays both of those out simultaneously so they mix, and thus ignite, in the air.
also a dragon isn't a real thing so deciding that one type is a wyvern and one isn't is kinda pointless, as it's basically the choice of whatever fantasy setting they're in
I think "Infected" in this scenario are people that encounter dragons on almost daily basis, while "Dead" are people killed by dragons. At least until people become infected and turn to giants.
No...I think it did intend to say some of the dragons were once people...the authors lack of knowledge of the English language made it near impossible to understand that but though
The British(and the majority of English based languages) pronounce is 'zed' because that is the original pronunciation. It comes from the Old French 'zede' which comes from the Greek 'zeta'. The primarily American pronunciation of 'zee' is believed to come from making it rhyme with with other letters like cee, dee, gee, tee, ect.
The classification of dragons is a tricky subject. Classifying them at all is redundant. There are just too many cultures with dragons in them, all very diverse. Saying that something like a wyvern isn’t a dragon doesn’t make sense. There is just way too many varieties.
It actually is explained in the how to train your dragon movie that most of the dragons do eat fish, only the red death(the massive dragon at the core of the hive that they fought at the end of the first movie really ate the stolen livestock (and the occasional underperforming dragon)
Exul well, if you play ark survival evolved. And watch youtubers play it, you hear it at least once a 2 days. And 1 UA-cam says it with the “with” sound. And the gamedevelopers said he was the only one who says it right
@@abyssal_phoenix Hmmm.... I would assume they called it differently is so they can differentiate between the game and folklore one. Cause if you search on Google how to pronounce Wyvern it says Wai-vrn
Dragons are big lizards that magic in one way or another. Subspecies however, include Wyverns, Wyrms, Hydras, Giant magical Dragon-Snakes (jormungandr), quadrupedal flightless Drakes, quadrupedal flight-capable Drakes, bipedal flight-capable Drakes, Sea Serpents, Sea Drakes, Draco-Golems, Dragonoids (humanoid dragons), Dracocentaurs, certain subclasses of Basilisks, Draconic Elemental Spirits, Chinese Dragons, Divine Dragons, Demonic Dragons, Dragon Gods, honorary Dragons (dovahkiin), Dragon Ghosts, Undead dragons and, last but not least, Curse-born Dragons (Fafnir). Yes, they are varied and awesome.
“They” has been an acceptable gender-neutral singular for centuries. Chaucer used it in the Canterbury Tales, Shakespeare used it, and it is in the King James Bible. Like so many of the silly and needlessly strict rules around English grammar (split infinitive for example) this convention was invented out of whole cloth by Victorian grammarians in the latter half of the 19th century.
the dragons in how to train your dragon actually Are primarily pescatarians, they go into it a little more in the sequels and extended media lmao. they were mostly stealing sheep etc to feed the giant queen dragon controlling them
As for the creature that can naturally breathe fire you're probably thinking of a particular type of dung beetle that has a combustive fart then and a little trigger thing near its back lakes it literally shits fire
Biologically, Yes a fire-breathing dragon is possible. Plenty of animals naturally produce methane (like propane, but lighter), and some can supply an ignition source (electric eels, for example) Unfortunately a legend-sized dragon would not be capable of true flight, as it would not be able to flap its wings fast enough without turning its bones to powder. It could evolve some kind of gliding ability, however. A real "dragon", assuming the definition of a dragon is a large reptile that: a. possesses some kind of fire breathing capability and b. possesses some form of air travel would probably be a grey-colored cliff dweller and an ambush predator. Nothing like the majestic flying dinos of legend. Also pretty much nothing (short of some guy with a firearm) could kill it, due to its pyrogenesis (science for fire-creating) ability. Assuming a dragon does not have to be big; You could have something quite similar to a real dragon, only approximating the size of a flying fox aka fruit bat, about a thousandth the scale of what we imagine dragons to be. It could possibly still breathe fire, though not in any considerable due to a lack of somewhere to store the necessary methane. It would also likely be an insect or small prey hunter, and would most certainly be highly explosive. Nobody ever considers the fact that if a dragon was full of methane (like a real life one would be), it has the potential to become a living hand grenade.
@Phantron Gaming True. But some lizards (gliding lizards) and flying squirrels have flaps of skin between their arms and legs. That's probably what the "Invincible cliff dweller" type of real dragon would have. Not a flier, but a glider. The "Firefox bat" real dragon would probably have wings similar in structure to a bat (wings, but small claws on the end and two legs.)
the only realistic way for fire breathing to evolve would be to create a organ that secretes flameble acid and to adapt the throat to launch this acid for some distance while also needing for the mounth to create 2 bonus that are flint based in structure to slam to each other to create a spark. this would result in a creature that can spit burning liquid and would be the closest realistic thing to fire breath
A dragon can be basically a serpent or a snake with some kind of mystical power (like Tetzacoatl or Asian dragons), a wywern, it can have fur not scales, or not have wings or it doesn't have to breath fire, it can be a human with wings, horns, or scales on their body, or a fluffy little bundle of cuteness that can kick someone's ass. Basically what causes misinterpretation about the concept of dragons is that - differently from most concepts - we're unable to tell exactly what dragon is. The main feature of dragon is it's "bad-assness", so to speak. Dragons are meant to be powerful creatures and that's their main distinction. Telling a wywern isn't a dragon is utterly wrong, since it's just what we can name a subcategory. Since wywerns are bad-ass flying reptiles, that includes them as dragons
Theoretically the fire breathing is possible. Since we could use methane, hydrogen, ethanol or magnesium. And there are then Just some kind of enzyms needed for combustion. And the body could create a thick layer of slime to protect the mouth and etc
Rick Borghuis Possibly, but for dragons it would likely be impossible or extremely difficult to do, seeing as they are reptiles of some degree and likely cold blooded, that much heat pouring out right next to their brain, esophagus, and possibly other internal organs depending on where the combustion begins, would cause quite a bit of damage due to their inability to regulate temperature.
@@jaxusr235 well, are/were all reptiles coldblooded? If dragons would have existed they likely evolved from archosauria or other Dinosaurs/large reptiles. It could very well be that they were warmblooded like birds
Wyverns would be more like pterodactyl descendants, but hey you never know! Human imagination is expansive, but maybe there was a giant bat and they thought the wings were separate from the hands... or forgot that the wing is the hand. Ancient times are straaange. A quick guide to dragons and cousins: Four legs, two wings: Dragons No legs, two wings: Amphiptere No legs, no wings: Wyrm Two legs, no wings: Lindwyrm Four legs, no wings: Is it long? Lung, is it not long? Drake Two legs, two wings: Wyvern
0:50 I am french, and Z, is Zed, I also learn the alphabet song in english, saying Zed, but overtime I started saying Zee. Guess that's cause I've been hearing plenty more american english, than british english.
It was actually depections of komodo dragons and their tounge flicking in artwork that led to fire breathing dragons unless i am gravely mistaken (pardon any spelling errors)
i herd that it was the spitting cobra and came from the basilisk/cockatrice poison breath thing. [venom spray --> killing poison cloud --> fire breath], [cobra hood --> wings] type of stuff.
@@marthachampagne316 naturally the idea of what we now consider dragons predates the discovery of Komodo or spitting cobras, the first dragons being depicted in ancient Mesopotamia art, the concept however also started in China and in thw nowaltal (i am probably wrong on the spelling here) in the americas with Quetzakawatal, who was a pretty big deal for quite a long time. Since we were talking about European dragons however and with the depections of large lizards having flickering that were extrodinarly long and were outside their mouthes, it has been deemed plausable that through depections of lizards tounges eventually turned into toungs of flame spittingncobras however could have had influence in the baselisk or cocatrise, i dont know how the idea for those monsters was formed.
I haven’t watched it in a long time but in HTTYD(the first one) at least one dragon(either a Nadder or a Zippleback) was shown to eat fish. However, the specimen in question was in captivity at the time so I don’t know whether they do that naturally. However, as my fellow commentator Kiena pointed out, they did have a much larger queen who was confirmed to eat sheep, which were brought to her by her smaller minions.
the dragon myths across the world date back to large reptiles that hunted humans and human like creatures a long time ago. so much so the human vision is acutely aware of snake patterns in the lower half of our vision more than any other species. large reptiles and fire were two of the scariest things to early humans so it makes sense that the combination would be the thing that terrified people.
8:30, yes-ish, there is the bombardier beetle can squirt out a hot chemical spray (burns), mostly as a defensive mechanism. Not technically fire breathing, but still rather interesting... (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_beetle)
Thumbs up just for pointing out the Dragon/Wyvern thing! It annoys me SOOO much when people do this. They even did this in the Hobbit movie! Tolkien would be ashamed.
dragons can also be lion turtles e.g tarasque from the tale of saint martha and in japan pretty sure theres also other bizarre things that are classified as dragons
I haven't ever seen one of these scenarios have consistent capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and grammar all the way through. And if they're close they don't clarify what the upgrades do.
Wouldn't it make more sense if this Scenario would have a path where the Dragons gather up Dragon loving hoomans and then be like: "Help our kind destroy all the haters and we'll let you live alongside us if you do." You know?
8:29 Pernese Dragons are scientifically explained on why they can breathe fire. They breathe HNO3. You can read more (spoilers for these books) here: pern.fandom.com/wiki/Agenothree
Monster Hunter gets wyverns pretty right when it comes to the flying wyvern genus (including Rathalos, Diablos, Nargacuga, Barioth, Tigrex and several more).
to be fair if a game or some other form of fiction says that dragons have 2 legs and wings i say sure as in in this universe this is what dragons look like
8:08 yes it is possible biologically however only in a small extent (@ least what i know of) there is this little bug that spits fire like a dragon but out of his or her butt
I think youre right the author of this mod probably don't have english as a first language. It being a roman language (such as french) would also explain the odd pronouns you found as both "burn" and "prion" are feminine in french.
It feels like this would be better thematically as a reskin of the PotA virus since it's infection of reptiles and humans. ... The Mega Brutal would probably still be painful though...
pravus bombardier beatles are the only thing in real life that breathes fire and by breath i mean fart and by fire i mean a chemical compound that is equivalent to fire but is still classified as a form of fire
Réptiles the "é" at least in Portuguese Brasil is pronounced "iih" it is an acute accent signal there is also "ê" which is a grave accent signal, pronounced "eeh"
Try my scenario: Roko's Basilisk It's about people who believe in an AI takeover taking over and creating AI so they won't be punished by the AI. Currently on front page of Popular with a 4 star rating. It features fully custom transmission, symptom, and abilities trees, and extensive use of the government actions lab.
wyverns aren't just dragons that have two legs. Those are still dragons. I can't remember exactly what a wyvern is, but it is not just a dragon minus two legs.
fire beath dragons was come from england where was type of samamander what spit Ethanol but not Direktly was found in Galapags ilands a lizard spiting salt Water soo yes it biologikly posible but not praktikal.
Hey pravus, about the creature with fire producing potential you may have read about, it could very well be the bombardier beetle, which creates a chemical cocktail in a special chamber in it's abdomen which he can "ignite" when it's threatened, which then causes it to spew out very hot webbing-like poisonous . It used it to ward of predators. It's a pretty damn rad beetle, here's a link if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/TgqF-ND2XcY/v-deo.html
There is an animal that can sort of produce a sort of fire it is the bomboder beetle idk if I spelled it right and look it up I’m not going to write what it does
Bombard beetle's are the closest to fire breathing critters so far...
A netflix series did a pretty good job approximating how an actual dragon could actually breathe actual fire. Yeah, they built a flamethrower.
Was gonna say the same
Fire farting
@@greatmind179 Only there is actually a way a real dragon could biologically siphon off the methane and then shoot it out its front.
well it does spew out boiling liquid so maybe yeah
"Dragons? Starting off in England sounds pretty good"
*China wants to have a word with you*
Greece would like to say something as well
@@SeventhSeraphOfficerRevolver As would every other ancient civilization in the world. Though it should be noted chinese dragons aren't actually dragons, that's just what their called cause of the british.
What can go wrong
wales: *laughs proudly*
@@AViewCado69420 You mean *laughs incomprehensibly*
Couple of things. Firstly, technically weyerns (*wyvern) are dragons, just not dragon dragons. The closest real life example would be that panda's are a type of bear, or that all thumbs are finger's, but not all fingers are thumbs. Also, it is theoretically possible for a creature to breath fire. Various theoretically methods have been thought up, ranging from producing some form of chemical which ignites when it comes into contact with air that is then sprayed out by the dragon, to the dragon having some form of shock organ similar to an electric eel, and produces some substance which can be ignited via a spark, to the dragon producing two chemicals which ignite when mixed together, and it sprays both of those out simultaneously so they mix, and thus ignite, in the air.
Sorry but its spelled wyvern
@@halowar0527 thank you.
Too bad flesh is susceptible to roasting.
or piezoelectric crystals and stomach gases
also a dragon isn't a real thing so deciding that one type is a wyvern and one isn't is kinda pointless, as it's basically the choice of whatever fantasy setting they're in
I think "Infected" in this scenario are people that encounter dragons on almost daily basis, while "Dead" are people killed by dragons.
At least until people become infected and turn to giants.
No...I think it did intend to say some of the dragons were once people...the authors lack of knowledge of the English language made it near impossible to understand that but though
The British(and the majority of English based languages) pronounce is 'zed' because that is the original pronunciation. It comes from the Old French 'zede' which comes from the Greek 'zeta'.
The primarily American pronunciation of 'zee' is believed to come from making it rhyme with with other letters like cee, dee, gee, tee, ect.
EEE
Is it just me, or does it feel like this disease should have been a simin flu.
or vampire plague, with like 3 or 4 big dragons and the smaller dragons with infection and stuff
Simion flu. Sorry for correcting u
@@한밤중-i9q it's fine, i was pretty sure I spelled it wrong anyway.
She has
yeahh it should've tbh
The classification of dragons is a tricky subject. Classifying them at all is redundant. There are just too many cultures with dragons in them, all very diverse. Saying that something like a wyvern isn’t a dragon doesn’t make sense. There is just way too many varieties.
I think that the biggest difference between dragons and wyverns are that dragons are often seen as more intelligent while wyverns are seen as beasts.
Dragons have a separate appendage for limbs
Wyverns use their arms
The whole dragon vs wyvern is a thing that started with dungeons and dragons. Before that it was just different kinds of dragons.
It actually is explained in the how to train your dragon movie that most of the dragons do eat fish, only the red death(the massive dragon at the core of the hive that they fought at the end of the first movie really ate the stolen livestock (and the occasional underperforming dragon)
The Bombardier beetle has a somewhat of a fire or acid defence
Pravus, the "wy" in "wyvern" is pronounced like "why"
I died a bit everytime Pravus said Wyvern cause he said it wrong every single time
I thought it is pronounced very different "wyvern" with an "i" from "with"
@@abyssal_phoenix Well... Guess you don't really hear the word that much so maybe that's why you thought differently
Exul well, if you play ark survival evolved. And watch youtubers play it, you hear it at least once a 2 days.
And 1 UA-cam says it with the “with” sound. And the gamedevelopers said he was the only one who says it right
@@abyssal_phoenix Hmmm.... I would assume they called it differently is so they can differentiate between the game and folklore one. Cause if you search on Google how to pronounce Wyvern it says Wai-vrn
I would've turned everyone into dragons
Dragons are big lizards that magic in one way or another. Subspecies however, include Wyverns, Wyrms, Hydras, Giant magical Dragon-Snakes (jormungandr), quadrupedal flightless Drakes, quadrupedal flight-capable Drakes, bipedal flight-capable Drakes, Sea Serpents, Sea Drakes, Draco-Golems, Dragonoids (humanoid dragons), Dracocentaurs, certain subclasses of Basilisks, Draconic Elemental Spirits, Chinese Dragons, Divine Dragons, Demonic Dragons, Dragon Gods, honorary Dragons (dovahkiin), Dragon Ghosts, Undead dragons and, last but not least, Curse-born Dragons (Fafnir).
Yes, they are varied and awesome.
“They” has been an acceptable gender-neutral singular for centuries. Chaucer used it in the Canterbury Tales, Shakespeare used it, and it is in the King James Bible. Like so many of the silly and needlessly strict rules around English grammar (split infinitive for example) this convention was invented out of whole cloth by Victorian grammarians in the latter half of the 19th century.
AlephGarden pr4vus
É is E but it's louder at the end while it's the opposite at the start
Well hello there!
General Kenobi!
Hello
Team Funtime4Life ah, I see your a man of culture as well!
@@imheretomakeyoucringe7950 You are a bold one.
old sport
the dragons in how to train your dragon actually Are primarily pescatarians, they go into it a little more in the sequels and extended media lmao. they were mostly stealing sheep etc to feed the giant queen dragon controlling them
Wyvns are a subset of dragons. Dragons are a very broad classification.
I was looking in the custom scenarios playlist and then like 5 minutes ago just appeared lmao cuz like it hasnt appeared on the videos tab yet
As for the creature that can naturally breathe fire you're probably thinking of a particular type of dung beetle that has a combustive fart then and a little trigger thing near its back lakes it literally shits fire
Wyverns are a type of dragon
Dragons are defined as large reptiles of legend. If the story dictates its a dragon, its definitely a dragon
My hypothesis is that dragon myths across the globe were inspired by dinosaur fossils
*Hypothesis
@@cac_deadlyrang thanks.
Immediate thumbs up for distinguishing between dragons and wyverns.
I would call this “here be dragons”
I could have sworn that you did this before
Biologically, Yes a fire-breathing dragon is possible. Plenty of animals naturally produce methane (like propane, but lighter), and some can supply an ignition source (electric eels, for example) Unfortunately a legend-sized dragon would not be capable of true flight, as it would not be able to flap its wings fast enough without turning its bones to powder. It could evolve some kind of gliding ability, however.
A real "dragon", assuming the definition of a dragon is a large reptile that: a. possesses some kind of fire breathing capability and b. possesses some form of air travel would probably be a grey-colored cliff dweller and an ambush predator. Nothing like the majestic flying dinos of legend. Also pretty much nothing (short of some guy with a firearm) could kill it, due to its pyrogenesis (science for fire-creating) ability.
Assuming a dragon does not have to be big; You could have something quite similar to a real dragon, only approximating the size of a flying fox aka fruit bat, about a thousandth the scale of what we imagine dragons to be. It could possibly still breathe fire, though not in any considerable due to a lack of somewhere to store the necessary methane. It would also likely be an insect or small prey hunter, and would most certainly be highly explosive.
Nobody ever considers the fact that if a dragon was full of methane (like a real life one would be), it has the potential to become a living hand grenade.
@Phantron Gaming True. But some lizards (gliding lizards) and flying squirrels have flaps of skin between their arms and legs. That's probably what the "Invincible cliff dweller" type of real dragon would have. Not a flier, but a glider. The "Firefox bat" real dragon would probably have wings similar in structure to a bat (wings, but small claws on the end and two legs.)
@Jamie Fletcher Another way it could work. I didn't think of that. Thanks.
the only realistic way for fire breathing to evolve would be to create a organ that secretes flameble acid and to adapt the throat to launch this acid for some distance while also needing for the mounth to create 2 bonus that are flint based in structure to slam to each other to create a spark. this would result in a creature that can spit burning liquid and would be the closest realistic thing to fire breath
My guess is that the creator of the scenario is French, or has French as a first language
*Laughs in Dragon*
A dragon can be basically a serpent or a snake with some kind of mystical power (like Tetzacoatl or Asian dragons), a wywern, it can have fur not scales, or not have wings or it doesn't have to breath fire, it can be a human with wings, horns, or scales on their body, or a fluffy little bundle of cuteness that can kick someone's ass. Basically what causes misinterpretation about the concept of dragons is that - differently from most concepts - we're unable to tell exactly what dragon is. The main feature of dragon is it's "bad-assness", so to speak. Dragons are meant to be powerful creatures and that's their main distinction. Telling a wywern isn't a dragon is utterly wrong, since it's just what we can name a subcategory. Since wywerns are bad-ass flying reptiles, that includes them as dragons
Theoretically the fire breathing is possible. Since we could use methane, hydrogen, ethanol or magnesium. And there are then Just some kind of enzyms needed for combustion. And the body could create a thick layer of slime to protect the mouth and etc
Rick Borghuis Possibly, but for dragons it would likely be impossible or extremely difficult to do, seeing as they are reptiles of some degree and likely cold blooded, that much heat pouring out right next to their brain, esophagus, and possibly other internal organs depending on where the combustion begins, would cause quite a bit of damage due to their inability to regulate temperature.
@@jaxusr235 well, are/were all reptiles coldblooded? If dragons would have existed they likely evolved from archosauria or other Dinosaurs/large reptiles. It could very well be that they were warmblooded like birds
For the interested there are actually lizards that can fly and have wings
Wyverns would be more like pterodactyl descendants, but hey you never know! Human imagination is expansive, but maybe there was a giant bat and they thought the wings were separate from the hands... or forgot that the wing is the hand. Ancient times are straaange.
A quick guide to dragons and cousins:
Four legs, two wings: Dragons
No legs, two wings: Amphiptere
No legs, no wings: Wyrm
Two legs, no wings: Lindwyrm
Four legs, no wings: Is it long? Lung, is it not long? Drake
Two legs, two wings: Wyvern
0:50
I am french, and Z, is Zed, I also learn the alphabet song in english, saying Zed, but overtime I started saying Zee. Guess that's cause I've been hearing plenty more american english, than british english.
Same here in Australia, Z is Zed but I just grown to say Z
Ah, I see that Pravus is a dragon purist
THANK YOU FOR POINTING OUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DRAGON AND A WYVERN!
Thank you for teaching me stuff about dragons. Plus, some reptiles can spit poison.
This is how the wings of fire series started
It was actually depections of komodo dragons and their tounge flicking in artwork that led to fire breathing dragons unless i am gravely mistaken (pardon any spelling errors)
i herd that it was the spitting cobra and came from the basilisk/cockatrice poison breath thing. [venom spray --> killing poison cloud --> fire breath], [cobra hood --> wings] type of stuff.
@@marthachampagne316 naturally the idea of what we now consider dragons predates the discovery of Komodo or spitting cobras, the first dragons being depicted in ancient Mesopotamia art, the concept however also started in China and in thw nowaltal (i am probably wrong on the spelling here) in the americas with Quetzakawatal, who was a pretty big deal for quite a long time. Since we were talking about European dragons however and with the depections of large lizards having flickering that were extrodinarly long and were outside their mouthes, it has been deemed plausable that through depections of lizards tounges eventually turned into toungs of flame spittingncobras however could have had influence in the baselisk or cocatrise, i dont know how the idea for those monsters was formed.
I haven’t watched it in a long time but in HTTYD(the first one) at least one dragon(either a Nadder or a Zippleback) was shown to eat fish. However, the specimen in question was in captivity at the time so I don’t know whether they do that naturally. However, as my fellow commentator Kiena pointed out, they did have a much larger queen who was confirmed to eat sheep, which were brought to her by her smaller minions.
the dragon myths across the world date back to large reptiles that hunted humans and human like creatures a long time ago. so much so the human vision is acutely aware of snake patterns in the lower half of our vision more than any other species. large reptiles and fire were two of the scariest things to early humans so it makes sense that the combination would be the thing that terrified people.
someone else realize that in the news bar in the top left of the screan it says covid 19 stay inside
8:30, yes-ish, there is the bombardier beetle can squirt out a hot chemical spray (burns), mostly as a defensive mechanism. Not technically fire breathing, but still rather interesting...
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_beetle)
Thumbs up just for pointing out the Dragon/Wyvern thing! It annoys me SOOO much when people do this. They even did this in the Hobbit movie! Tolkien would be ashamed.
Pravus pronouncing wyvern like wivern is too funny
dragons can also be lion turtles e.g tarasque from the tale of saint martha and in japan pretty sure theres also other bizarre things that are classified as dragons
8:22 Bombardier Beetle?
10:51 *DRAGON-BORN*
Your videos butter my biscuits thank you
I mean its plague inc. Any fantasy stuff you've been seeing can be a Plague
No hate just this game is really unique
Good on you for starting in the the Baltic States. Lithuanian here.
I haven't ever seen one of these scenarios have consistent capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and grammar all the way through. And if they're close they don't clarify what the upgrades do.
Wouldn't it make more sense if this Scenario would have a path where the Dragons gather up Dragon loving hoomans and then be like: "Help our kind destroy all the haters and we'll let you live alongside us if you do." You know?
8:29 Pernese Dragons are scientifically explained on why they can breathe fire. They breathe HNO3. You can read more (spoilers for these books) here: pern.fandom.com/wiki/Agenothree
Finally my dragon family comes home. Praise Pravus
Monster Hunter gets wyverns pretty right when it comes to the flying wyvern genus (including Rathalos, Diablos, Nargacuga, Barioth, Tigrex and several more).
to be fair if a game or some other form of fiction says that dragons have 2 legs and wings i say sure as in in this universe this is what dragons look like
A hyperbolic reaction could be used to make their fire
Bruh this video just got uploaded 18 minutes ago ._.
HOW THE HELL DID IT GET ALREADY 1 DISLIKE? >:(
I'M MAD
8:08 yes it is possible biologically however only in a small extent (@ least what i know of) there is this little bug that spits fire like a dragon but out of his or her butt
Komodo dragon will probably be the closest we'll get to anything of mythical dragon size
I like dragons!
o and also great another person that understands the science and especies of dragons
I’m getting some reign of fire vibes from this
I think youre right the author of this mod probably don't have english as a first language. It being a roman language (such as french) would also explain the odd pronouns you found as both "burn" and "prion" are feminine in french.
10/10 for effort my Man !
10:52 Or you entered Skyrim without noticing
Wyverns are subspecies of dragon
Skyrim is also guilty of having wyverns instead of dragons but still calling them dragons
And wyverns have a poison they splurt out of their tail.
Behold, the dragon born
Thnks amigo u also agree about the difference between wyverns and dragons
Where is Mr beast planting 20m trees scenario where is it tell me
ah yes we should end humanity by dragons
They eat fish. '-' you know this because a grucle brought one to the alpha and was eaten for not having sufficiently supplied
Might be a bit mean but this video gives me a lot of "Old person that can't keep up with the times" vibe from Pravus
nah i get those vibes a lot from pravus, normally it would bother me but I enjoy plague inc.
Drakon is a giant snake with poison scales
Author is may be French. It does explain the accents and the use of she instead of it (most romance languages are gendered)
It feels like this would be better thematically as a reskin of the PotA virus since it's infection of reptiles and humans. ... The Mega Brutal would probably still be painful though...
pravus bombardier beatles are the only thing in real life that breathes fire and by breath i mean fart and by fire i mean a chemical compound that is equivalent to fire but is still classified as a form of fire
Birds are decendants of reptiles
Before ‘they’ was agreed on, ‘he’ was the gender neutral word
Me: THE MORE YOU KNOW🌈🌟
praise to thy lord pravus.
Réptiles the "é" at least in Portuguese Brasil is pronounced "iih" it is an acute accent signal there is also "ê" which is a grave accent signal, pronounced "eeh"
Bio electricity plus some sort of gas would work
Try my scenario: Roko's Basilisk
It's about people who believe in an AI takeover taking over and creating AI so they won't be punished by the AI.
Currently on front page of Popular with a 4 star rating. It features fully custom transmission, symptom, and abilities trees, and extensive use of the government actions lab.
wyverns aren't just dragons that have two legs. Those are still dragons. I can't remember exactly what a wyvern is, but it is not just a dragon minus two legs.
You peak my curiosity
fire beath dragons was come from england where was type of samamander what spit Ethanol
but not Direktly was found in Galapags ilands a lizard spiting salt Water soo yes it biologikly posible but not praktikal.
Gotta go fast
Yes you do.
Awesome vid
Are we all gonna ignore the news reel on 2:48?
Hey pravus, about the creature with fire producing potential you may have read about, it could very well be the bombardier beetle, which creates a chemical cocktail in a special chamber in it's abdomen which he can "ignite" when it's threatened, which then causes it to spew out very hot webbing-like poisonous . It used it to ward of predators. It's a pretty damn rad beetle, here's a link if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/TgqF-ND2XcY/v-deo.html
Its shown in the movies that they mostly eat fish
Bombardeer beetle can technically breathe fire.... from their ass.
There is an animal that can sort of produce a sort of fire it is the bomboder beetle idk if I spelled it right and look it up I’m not going to write what it does
Trinston was here.
We pronounce Z as Zed, because we have this other letter called C. Y'all weird. ;)
Also Wyvern - Why-Vern.
An animal can only have 4 limbs because of common ancestors
You mentioned fire breathers, what about acid spitting creatures, acid for me is basically liquid fire there's a base
Dragons breathe fire
Wyverns are similar to dragons but without fire
lizardboy1 /coolizrd actually wyverns are dragons, in order to be a dragon all you have to do is be a large reptile that can fly