"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.
There is a massive hole in your argument. The "unborn" require a great deal of medical care their supposed advocates don't care about. The anti abortion crowd isn't fired up for government paid free prenatal care.
A law from the 1930s... wow... Can you imagine that a law from the thirties could be brought back because a lying man cited the legal expertise of a guy who burned women alive he accused of witchcraft? Only these villainous characters could think that taking a giant step backwards in personal liberty was a good thing. I think that the Supreme court needs to be prohibited from making changes that take away rights from citizens. Maybe they could make the suggestion but Congress should have final say. I also find it distressing that Trump was able to nominate 3 justices for the bench when he's a blatant criminal and potentially a traitor. I still want to know if he sold access to those top secret documents to any foreign enemies of the United States. Or did he intend to? What possible reason could he have for those documents? Good luck.
Not only are you playing with a double edged sword but its dull on your end. There are many laws from the 30s brought back *cough* mostly gun related. So should those also be gone? Also congress making decisions, sounds like a big disaster depending on who is in charge of congress.
"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.
There is a massive hole in your argument. The "unborn" require a great deal of medical care their supposed advocates don't care about. The anti abortion crowd isn't fired up for government paid free prenatal care.
KILL THE UNBORN, FOR SOCIAL AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
The unborn are a convenient group to kill, They never make any demands of you........etc.
Theses children deserve a voice instead of being snuffed out to avoid personal responsibility.
@@arscheerio That's because they aren't people. They are cells.
Insane progressive membranes.
A law from the 1930s... wow... Can you imagine that a law from the thirties could be brought back because a lying man cited the legal expertise of a guy who burned women alive he accused of witchcraft? Only these villainous characters could think that taking a giant step backwards in personal liberty was a good thing.
I think that the Supreme court needs to be prohibited from making changes that take away rights from citizens. Maybe they could make the suggestion but Congress should have final say. I also find it distressing that Trump was able to nominate 3 justices for the bench when he's a blatant criminal and potentially a traitor. I still want to know if he sold access to those top secret documents to any foreign enemies of the United States. Or did he intend to? What possible reason could he have for those documents?
Good luck.
Not only are you playing with a double edged sword but its dull on your end. There are many laws from the 30s brought back *cough* mostly gun related. So should those also be gone? Also congress making decisions, sounds like a big disaster depending on who is in charge of congress.
Gretchen Whitmer for Michigan!!!!
What is the status of the rebate checks that suposibly was proposed in May. The $500 checks.
Keep us posted, Thank YOU Governor Whitmer!!!
WOMEN IF you want men controling your body....vote Republican
Take responsibility for your actions. Same for men
stop sleeping around?
Reminder this is coming from a man… Average hypocrite Democrat
@@ntplays8801 irrelevant