Cirrus Vision Jet G2 Flight Trial

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 гру 2019
  • The $2.75 million Cirrus Vision Jet G2, for second-generation, remains in a class by itself because it's the only certified single-engine turbofan-powered personal airplane, and it has the Cirrus CAPS whole-airplane parachute. For 2020, the Vision Jet has a few sizable changes including RVSM compliance for a 31,000-foot operating ceiling, increased payload, a 1200-mile max range, Safe Return Emergency Autoland (which is currently being certified and to be standard equipment), plus autothrottle. In this video Aviation Consumer Editor Larry Anglisano takes a close look at the Vision Jet G2 with Cirrus' Matt Bergwall. Read the full report in the January 2019 Aviation Consumer magazine.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 164

  • @richieknecht
    @richieknecht 4 роки тому +5

    Wow, have them do another demo in CT! Would love to go for a ride. KHVN!

  • @dani73737374
    @dani73737374 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks for this video! Would you let me know what's your setup for recording cockpit audio?

  • @elonwong
    @elonwong 3 роки тому +1

    il just keep dreaming of buying this beauty

  • @jamman55
    @jamman55 3 роки тому +3

    The major sell here is safety. The parachute system has already saved lives. I expect the price to go down as more orders are filled and production is more streamlined.

  • @Windtee
    @Windtee 4 роки тому +3

    I think there's a Vision G1 for rent on Long Island, NY at KFRG, Nassau Flyers.

  • @oscarc332
    @oscarc332 4 роки тому +17

    this is the perfect transition from cesnass to a jet and then to embraer 145 or crj200

  • @upsidedowndog1256
    @upsidedowndog1256 4 роки тому +2

    I like the V-tail. My favorite aircraft to fly has that and handles like nothing else in the air, except hopefully this!

  • @littlebit670
    @littlebit670 3 роки тому

    Now the TBM 940 is getting E-Autoland, called HomeSafe in that plane.

  • @douglasownbey656
    @douglasownbey656 4 роки тому +1

    Just saw two of these fly over the house today on their way to Lancaster, PA.

  • @alexeyzorkin2288
    @alexeyzorkin2288 4 роки тому +2

    Самолет просто космос!

  • @donaldholman9070
    @donaldholman9070 4 роки тому +2

    Like the music

  • @DrPilotRedC
    @DrPilotRedC 4 роки тому +15

    "or if a Vision Jet is longer a part of their future"
    What a beautiful piece of corporate talk.

    • @_monti142
      @_monti142 3 роки тому

      yeah

    • @lunitedes1
      @lunitedes1 3 роки тому

      $$$$$ , buy a bigger faster one.

    • @Saintathantwinpeaks
      @Saintathantwinpeaks 2 роки тому

      More likely speculators buying early slots so they can price gouge once demand soars.

  • @roostersideburns3440
    @roostersideburns3440 3 роки тому

    id love to ride in one of these

  • @markbaker8
    @markbaker8 4 роки тому +5

    Does the Safe Return feature have 'Go-Around' if the conditions change on approach etc?

    • @Sokeresa
      @Sokeresa 3 роки тому

      This is a great question. I doubt it

    • @a9653192
      @a9653192 3 роки тому +7

      Well since you are squawking 7700, and it sends out a declaration to tower. You’ll get granted clearance first

  • @DavideCarbonell
    @DavideCarbonell 4 роки тому +3

    this aircraft have no wiper ?

  • @Assassin1959
    @Assassin1959 4 роки тому +7

    The passenger is not landing the airplane, the computer is landing the airplane.

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 роки тому +4

      The real question is who gets to log it? Garmin? lol

    • @Assassin1959
      @Assassin1959 4 роки тому +1

      @@tonyunderwood9438 of course and Garmin will log it as PIC. lol

    • @a9653192
      @a9653192 3 роки тому

      @@tonyunderwood9438 obviously Jarvis

  • @Enonymouse_
    @Enonymouse_ 4 роки тому +3

    If had this kind of money to spend, this is a toy I would love to own.

    • @Enonymouse_
      @Enonymouse_ 3 роки тому

      @Kelp Farming 😄.. they would still starve if i didnt..

  • @cmdmd
    @cmdmd 2 роки тому

    Farther: measurable distance
    Further: progress

  • @heavyizthacrown-5842
    @heavyizthacrown-5842 3 роки тому +4

    The Auto-land system might allow some with certain disabilities/medical conditions to fly safely again. Great *innovation* Cirrus! 👍🏾

    • @jarodmorris611
      @jarodmorris611 3 роки тому +4

      Unlikely. Just because the jet can land safely doesn't mean that the FAA is going to approve that pilot to fly. I don't think the FAA would approve a pilot to fly a jet and no other type of aircraft due to a medical issue.

    • @biggentallen
      @biggentallen 2 роки тому

      Yeah but the FAA won't

    • @sigbauer9782
      @sigbauer9782 Рік тому

      No, you still need a valid medical.

  • @HarveyCohen
    @HarveyCohen 4 роки тому +6

    Commenters who claim the airplane is a poor value versus competing planes may be right. If so, I'd be interested to understand why there's already 500 orders.

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 3 роки тому +1

      Harvey Cohen because cirrus is good at marketing... and they can up sell existing customers who are flying sr-22s

    • @Vladdy89
      @Vladdy89 3 роки тому +2

      This is a very strange question. Put a bitten apple on the fuselage and there'd be 5000 orders.

  • @degentelletubbie
    @degentelletubbie 2 роки тому

    What's the range of one of these at MTOW?

  • @tobberfutooagain2628
    @tobberfutooagain2628 3 роки тому

    300 kts., FL310, 60 gal./hr., 3 pax, Takeoff distance 2,500ft., $2.75M

  • @bodystomp5302
    @bodystomp5302 4 роки тому +11

    I'd like to see Niko upgrade to one of these.

    • @ram64man
      @ram64man 3 роки тому

      He has a great tdm already that’s more mission ready to his needs that turboprop he has is amazing

  • @gmcjetpilot
    @gmcjetpilot 4 роки тому +8

    SE Jet.. but it's turbo prop speeds. For a lot less money you can get clean early model TBM.

    • @bradfordmontgomery4647
      @bradfordmontgomery4647 4 роки тому

      Of course you can. But this one is new and a lot of people like to buy new panes.

  • @RobertMayfair
    @RobertMayfair 4 роки тому +12

    The number one reason this thing sells is the ability of its owners to tell people they have a jet.

  • @Psychopappy
    @Psychopappy 3 роки тому

    How many miles can this fly

  • @peppeddu
    @peppeddu 3 роки тому

    Note the big size high contrast buttons and text on all screens.
    Where the rubber meets the road and speed/accuracy/safety count they don't do tiny fonts with light-gray text on a white background like the crappy apps on Android and iOS

  • @2011blueman
    @2011blueman 4 роки тому +9

    I don’t see the value in this over any of the higher end turbo props. The load and range specs don’t fit my typical mission profile, and operating costs are higher.

    • @3204clivesinclair
      @3204clivesinclair 4 роки тому +4

      Although it may not meet your needs, it does have some unique features, that are not available (to my knowledge) on any turbo prop. BRS (like them or not), they are a USP for Cirrus aircraft. Add the latest flight control electronics that can auto land the aircraft (initiated by a passenger), in case of an incapacitated pilot. The closest aircraft I can think of that has such an easy starting system is the PC12 (latest version), although that is a lot more expensive and larger.

    • @mikeassayag8044
      @mikeassayag8044 4 роки тому

      Clive Sinclair and it’s got a parachute

  • @alaskaaksala123
    @alaskaaksala123 4 роки тому

    It would be an awesome plane to own...

  • @AnguoChen
    @AnguoChen 2 роки тому

    I’m training at KHFD.

  • @videosuperhighway7655
    @videosuperhighway7655 3 роки тому

    The real costs will be fuel costs, hangar costs, maintenance etc… you need to earn about 2M a year with 5-10M in liquid net assets in order to own one. Otherwise it makes more sense to use something like netjets card etc.. and just pay per use.
    What this jet will do is open up private jet travel to more people since it will make fractional use more affordable.
    60 gallons an hour is impressive nice cut in fuel expense.

  • @GodSonBlessed
    @GodSonBlessed 2 роки тому

    If you're super rich this is a better way to spend your money than a Bugatti.

  • @DrPilotRedC
    @DrPilotRedC 4 роки тому +1

    Cirrus will sell the shit out of these I'm sure.

  • @sigbauer9782
    @sigbauer9782 Рік тому

    This is what cracks me up about all of these aircraft- 14 seats but if so loaded, then you will be able to carry enough fuel to get you to the hold short line of your desired runway. Seriously, don't effin' say that the plane can carry 5 "Adults" and 2 kids if your fuel load will only get you 100 miles.

  • @schumzy
    @schumzy 2 роки тому

    If only there was a sound measuring device, to really help us understand how much noise reduction they've done. Guess we'll just have to take their word for it. I mean they wouldn't talk about a negligible improvement just to sell million dollar plane, now would they.

  • @prestonmiller9552
    @prestonmiller9552 4 роки тому +1

    I guess one of my objections to the Vision Jet is the Vee Tail similar to the old Bonanzas. The Bonanzas suffered from fish tailing and often made rear passengers air sick after a time. I assume this is the same problem with the Vision Jet although perhaps a good yaw damper might help. The sound level still seems a bit loud with the engine placement atop the Fuselage. Not sure I would be a candidate for a Vison Jet purchase. I guess I would need a flight test to be sure.

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 роки тому +7

      Not an issue in this airplane. It has yaw stability augmentation, and the autopilot's yaw servo automatically engages on the initial climb. No tail wag.

    • @fiedlertimify
      @fiedlertimify 4 роки тому

      On top with one vs two on the side. Doesn’t seem to me like it would be that big of a difference?

    • @tropicthndr
      @tropicthndr 4 роки тому

      That’s why the tail is as tall as the Empire State Building, to get ride of that.

  • @staticon1976
    @staticon1976 4 роки тому +1

    this might be a dumb question but what if a bird flys into this port 4:42 ? it burns out the engine and crash land???

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 роки тому +3

      With any single engine plane (turbine or otherwise) the pilot has the option to attempt an emergency landing in the event of an engine failure, but with both Cirrus piston and jet aircraft the pilot also has the option to pull the chute to get on the ground safely.

    • @ericww1993
      @ericww1993 4 роки тому

      It has parachute

  • @amiraghazadeh5820
    @amiraghazadeh5820 2 роки тому

    👏👏👏❤❤❤

  • @rblx0879
    @rblx0879 4 роки тому +2

    I fly this on 9- X plane 11!

    • @tomatosoupwoo
      @tomatosoupwoo 3 роки тому

      It’s a g1 in x plane 11 as far as I’m aware.

  • @sleepingwithesirens9397
    @sleepingwithesirens9397 3 роки тому

    Honda Jet all the way !

  • @craigjhr
    @craigjhr 3 роки тому +4

    When Dogecoin goes to the Moon, I might get one of these, since it'll fit in my 42' wide hangar.

    • @smartcontract7929
      @smartcontract7929 3 роки тому +1

      when ADA touch 100 dollar i will buy a cirrus and tmb 940 e.e

  • @MAGApepe
    @MAGApepe 4 роки тому +16

    4:00 checklist 10 oxy master on,, but its not,,, i caught ya lol

  • @Craneman4100w
    @Craneman4100w 4 роки тому +1

    The rep said you just passed 300 kts but the PFD says 226 kts. My TAS/KTAS Calculator says 214 kts but my OAT Estimation Calculation might be off a bit. I'd consider a Citation Mustang and upgrade the G1000 to NXi before I bought this turkey. It flys faster and higher with more room and seats inside plus a Lav and twin engine redundancy and would cost over a million dollars less. No contest.

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 роки тому +6

      Negative. The B-roll you saw was lagged a touch with the actual standup audio, and the frame shows the aircraft's speed just after level-off from the long climb. When the autopilot trimmed it and the airplane settled into cruise, it made 303 true.

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 роки тому

      @@AVweb Ok, thanks, it just didn't show.

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 роки тому +2

      @NonyaBusiness! If you have the cash..... That's the thing. If you pony up close to 3 million dollars for a plane (including taxes and sales commissions) a few hundred dollars an hour is nothing. Keep in mind the million-plus you save buying used. Those savings will easily buy many thousands of gallons of JetA with very generous amounts left over for a paint job and an overhaul or two. Look at many of the used small jets for sale and you'll notice that few have any significant hours on them. You are looking at toys for the wealthy who become bored or no longer willing to invest time into remaining current and move on to the next adventure. Remember, there are a lot of people who can purchase these things with no more financial strain that you would have buying a Happy Meal.

  • @skiba21sk
    @skiba21sk 4 роки тому +1

    Jésus 😍😍😍

  • @marcusjohn6654
    @marcusjohn6654 2 роки тому

    IF they can every get this aircraft to carry 5 pax at 200 pounds each, and 3-4 hours of fuel, it would make the perfect air taxi .

  • @thomasauto4862
    @thomasauto4862 3 роки тому

    MMM...Jet Noise!!!

  • @naughtyUphillboy
    @naughtyUphillboy 3 роки тому

    & Headphone Jack fire.........Cirrus..........get Serious about Quality.........

  • @Airplanefish
    @Airplanefish 4 роки тому

    Your not going to talk about the "Autobrake"????

    • @AVweb
      @AVweb  4 роки тому

      Sure we could. The braking mode was disabled in this airplane when we flew it last fall. The company made the decision to not demo the braking when the airplane was away from its home-base test environment.

    • @Airplanefish
      @Airplanefish 4 роки тому

      @@AVweb I did the first annual inspection on that SF50 you were flying. Right after the inspection it went back to cirrus to get the executive center console thing and the "fly me home safe" system installed.

  • @alesso9174
    @alesso9174 4 роки тому +1

    is this safer than a cesna?

    • @khali333k7
      @khali333k7 4 роки тому

      I think so since it has a particular deployment

  • @arsenalroo
    @arsenalroo 3 роки тому +2

    "more easier"

  • @CraigWilton
    @CraigWilton 4 роки тому +17

    Seems like you’re just a passenger in your own plane. Hardly pilot’s aircraft.

    • @herobo123456
      @herobo123456 3 роки тому +2

      Its about getting for a to b safely not hand flying around the lake on a Sunday. They dont want too many GA knuckleheads crashing them

  • @nazur72
    @nazur72 3 роки тому

    My offer: $2.6 million, not a penny more.

  • @Kaipeternicolas
    @Kaipeternicolas 4 роки тому +5

    Nice update. I'd still go for the TBM or PC12 I think. I just don't like single engine turbo fans and the Vision Jet just seems like a toy plane to me.

    • @tonyunderwood9438
      @tonyunderwood9438 4 роки тому +2

      I go back and forth with the TBM and the Vision Jet as our next one. Number one reason the Cirrus Jet is still in the discussion is the chute. Momma really likes the chute and momma gets what momma wants. ;-)

    • @mikeassayag8044
      @mikeassayag8044 4 роки тому +2

      Tony Underwood I’m on the sAme page Tony. Having a chute on to- of having auto land... there is no comparison for he safety for me and my loved ones. Rugs technology will be forced into higher end jets in the future

  • @TM-vn3du
    @TM-vn3du 3 роки тому +2

    Who's the BABE in the back?

  • @JoshuaG
    @JoshuaG 4 роки тому +1

    If only that emergency autoland are on big jets , hahaha xD

    • @doolittlegeorge
      @doolittlegeorge 4 роки тому +1

      Good point and of course the problem with a passenger plane is its enormous mass. The airframe basically *falls* out of sky to land. There is no such thing as a *controlled descent* in a commercial plane.

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 3 роки тому +4

      Andrew Doolittle that’s...absolutely not true in the slightest 😂

    • @clickenpie
      @clickenpie 3 роки тому +4

      Some commercial jets are already implementing/implemented this concept for emergencies when the pilot and copilot are disabled from landing or flying the aircraft

    • @v1_rotate638
      @v1_rotate638 3 роки тому

      @@clickenpie also false but okay

    • @ellachen6865
      @ellachen6865 3 роки тому +2

      @@v1_rotate638 airbus a220 has already achieved cat 3 autoland. So they are already STARTING to implement this. Concepthyper never said it was fully in the systems.

  • @chippledon1
    @chippledon1 4 роки тому

    As a curious layman (not a pilot), are there certain conditions that you cannot fly in? Such as high winds - it being such a small craft.

  • @TumusiimeJoseph-tm8xz
    @TumusiimeJoseph-tm8xz Рік тому

    Tumusiime joesph

  • @airbornepotato
    @airbornepotato 4 роки тому +1

    16g/h that's awesome

    • @superchargedpetrolhead
      @superchargedpetrolhead 4 роки тому +2

      60 gallons/h on cruise, Not even many pistons do 16/h gallons on high speed cruise and this is a turbofan.

  • @yougotburned2143
    @yougotburned2143 4 роки тому +1

    If they used raw carbon fiber for the center and instrument console it'd look way better and not look so cheap plasticky.

  • @naughtyUphillboy
    @naughtyUphillboy 3 роки тому +1

    3 people ........pretty loaded Up.......

  • @sbreheny
    @sbreheny Рік тому

    Unless she did not want it, you should have also credited the employee in the back doing the camera work. Given her young age, maybe she is only an intern, but still, she should be credited.

  • @liamhygge
    @liamhygge 4 роки тому +2

    У девчонки глаза разбегаются
    Она всеми силами пытается снимать, но ей явно не до того

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 роки тому

      Но она очень милая

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 роки тому +1

      Craneman да)))
      Особенно, когда сама не может осознать происходящего, будто первый раз в самолете)))

    • @Craneman4100w
      @Craneman4100w 4 роки тому

      @@liamhygge Я согласен, она выглядела нервной и растерянной.

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 роки тому

      Craneman а ты потерянным и запутавшимся. Ибо что ты делаешь в этом видосе? Это ж надо его найти и попасть на просмотр еще

  • @glishskiii
    @glishskiii 4 роки тому +1

    Rather have a king air

  • @ItsAllAboutGuitar
    @ItsAllAboutGuitar 3 роки тому +1

    Something about the CAPS, the auto landing...I just don't care for it.

  • @robertlashier8779
    @robertlashier8779 3 роки тому

    How does an average person own one of these??

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty 3 роки тому +4

      By marrying a non-average person

    • @jlalbee
      @jlalbee 2 роки тому

      The average person doesn't.

  • @StreetArtillery
    @StreetArtillery 3 роки тому

    Too heavy

  • @williambryan5188
    @williambryan5188 3 роки тому

    Centerline for takeoff is just for professional pilots I guess. 😉

  • @johnames6430
    @johnames6430 3 роки тому

    he should've practiced his little speech infront of a mirror or something, it was bad

  • @1biggun712
    @1biggun712 4 роки тому +3

    1 Bitchin jet 😋😁

  • @ga1205
    @ga1205 4 роки тому +9

    Mismatched b-roll and poor grammar from the rep selling a $2.75m aircraft made this grating to watch. Maybe try more than one take and don’t have the intern do the editing on the next one.

  • @tropicthndr
    @tropicthndr 4 роки тому +2

    You mean the first version was so noisy for passengers they had to wear headsets in the back, what the fk. That’s definitely not what anyone wants when they ride in a jet.

    • @creativemode7397
      @creativemode7397 3 роки тому

      The only reason it's noisy in the cabin is because the aircraft is so small, the engine is soo close to cabin to the cabin. Plus, it's one of the cheapest jets you could buy, they don't put thick 100% noise reducing walls in the aircraft. They use whatever material is best for the price.

  • @raymond3803
    @raymond3803 4 роки тому +3

    $20,000 plane parachutes or so stupid, expensive and heavy.
    Never take off without a back-pack parachute $1,500.
    When things go south, pick up everything that can be used to ID you.
    Climb out on the wing. Spray paint over plane ID as best you can...…….. *THEN JUMP!*

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 роки тому +1

      Dumb as hell try that at the wrong altitude and see don’t you pass out disabling you from pulling the chute, or worse you get sucked into an engine or killed by a turboprop.
      You’re not a genius there are reasons people aren’t just carrying parachutes 🪂 stop watching so many movies.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 роки тому

      @@WattsUpDev Dumb? Really? There's several hundred 737 max passengers that would have took that option if given the chance. 3,000 more who worked in WTC.#1 & #2
      Commercial Plane Seat cushions should be back -pack parachutes with a snack, drink, and blow-up flotation devise inside. 138 IQ is closer to genius, than moronic dumb ass.......A lot closer.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 роки тому

      @Stool Postssubstantiate that claim

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 роки тому

      rayism 24b Stupidity is something you can’t debate with.

    • @raymond3803
      @raymond3803 4 роки тому

      @@WattsUpDev Don't see "stupid" nor "debate" mentioned in this thread. Why would you?

  • @armaghanasghar2911
    @armaghanasghar2911 4 роки тому +1

    Who else is planning to buy a jet because of the pandemic?

  • @Xperim
    @Xperim 4 роки тому +7

    This jet has the shittiest specs out of all jets.

    • @liamhygge
      @liamhygge 4 роки тому

      Xperim and lowest price

    • @Xperim
      @Xperim 4 роки тому

      @NonyaBusiness! You can get a Eclipse 550 for around $2.5 million.

    • @chucklesx
      @chucklesx 4 роки тому

      @@Xperim... if you do some research the eclipse alot of negatives. The theory of the airframe and ownership mision is great but in reality their production is limited by lack of funds, they have two projects (kestrel turboprop and eclipse canada) that have been on the books for years and neither have shown much progress, again due to lack of money. The company is basically seen as on the verge on bankruptcy most the time by many in the industry. As for the current or older aircraft they have a history of issues including the avidyne avionics suite being tempermental to say the least.

  • @enricomosca4674
    @enricomosca4674 3 роки тому +1

    Please don't fly on busy airports... Take-off performances are so poor... Atc here.

  • @trade_design23
    @trade_design23 Рік тому

    While, the young lady in the back is only doing as instructed........ What a Joke !! You need a much better system to hold the camera steady other than someone with a cell phone held at arms length. LOL. Try a short tripod that can be set up on the floor of the back seat area. Other than comedy central from the back, an informative video. And for the young lady in the back... Post your resume, you need a better job.

  • @raymond3803
    @raymond3803 4 роки тому +2

    Ugly plane. Ugly cabin. Stratos, Diamond D ducted engine look so much better.
    Eclipse 400 and Epic Victory look better
    Piper Jet looks worse.

    • @WattsUpDev
      @WattsUpDev 4 роки тому +4

      You just mentioned a bunch random jets that either no longer exist or lack certification

  • @khali333k7
    @khali333k7 4 роки тому +1

    I wish if kobe Bryant had this type of cirrus, he wouldn't have died , this cirrus is very ok because of its parachute deployment

    • @GodSonBlessed
      @GodSonBlessed 2 роки тому

      RIP to Kobe, Gianna and all the other people who passed on that day. But this wouldn't have worked for Kobe, because he needed the helicopter to be able to take off and land anywhere like his backyard, daughters gym, his doctor's office the bank etc... You can't do that with a jet.