Hey I can't help but be 17 years old! And before I played on PC I was on the PS3 with my first actual video game being the "Wall. E" movie tie in game.
@@PlanetaryFacts You’re just a sprout! 🤣 I was 33, when I picked up KSP in 2012. Now I’m 44, and will be much closer to 50, by the time this sequel finally gets off the ground! 😢 It breaks the heart! By the way, I love your editing, narration, and ability to get to the point! Thumbs up, sir! 👍
Most of my rockets are completely unlaunchable. Not because they can’t fly, but because when I press the “Launch” button, the game freezes. I am running a 4090
Some people in the community suspect that they had to remove features like interstellar travel, colonies and multiplayer from the build for full release as these features are not ready yet and that broke a bunch of stuff. I hope shit gets fixed soon because it's s just unacceptable asking 50 macaronis to be a beta tester....
We're lucky KSP2 ever got out of development hell, to be honest. It had an initial release date of Q1 2020, and changed studios *4 TIMES* (Squad > Star Theory > Private Division > Intercept Games) in the middle of development, with a lot of the work getting lost each time. I can guarantee you that Windows 10 was not a minimum requirement back in Q1 2020. At some point *they had to start over from scratch.* I suspect the only reason it got released in its current state is that during a shareholder meeting it showed up as a glaringly in-the-red project that was initially a 1 year project that has now gone on 4 years old, and there was a threat to cancel the project entirely.
Squad didn't develop ksp2 at all and only developed ksp 1. Only star theory and intercept games developed ksp 2. Private division is the publisher of ksp.
@@fpshobbs All the more valid, I'd say! Star Theory didn't develop the first KSP, and so didn't really have the muscle memory of how to code a game like this. It might as well have been better had Squad did at least *some* work before handing it over. Also Private Division at large *did* work on the game before Intercept Games was put to the task - that is, while they were in talks to purchase Star Theory, but never did, instead opting to set up the new studio that was named Intercept Games. My original point stands valid.
@@alexjgilpin This is some "woman with two black eyes telling the cops that despite the domestic abuse, she really loves her husband" kind of thing to say.
@@fpshobbs And Squad didn't develop KSP1... Felipe Falanghe(and his hand picked crew) did, and was backed by a passionate, enthusiastic, highly intelligent modding community. It's hard to believe his story isn't shared much anymore, let alone even his name dropped. He was the heart and soul of the original and his treatment by Squad, followed by Take-Two and Intercept Games treatment of the IP... it deserves to fail horribly.
From first hearing about a game to actually buying it runs somewhere from 4-6yrs.. 2 or 3 years prelaunch hype train then 2 or 3 years of patches, fixes and add ons.. somewhere around year 5, it actually becomes a worthwhile purchase I look forward to playing KSP2 in 2025
I bought it already. The game actually doesn't use the full resources of my computer, and runs at 15-30 fps depending on how big my crafts are and the distance from a celestial body. And for a simulation game it is very light on the CPU, which if it were more CPU reliant then it wouldn't need an RTX 4090 to get 30fps.
My first game was KSP too!!! I got it back in 2017, and I still play it to this day. In fact, I'm playing it right now. Although I've only accumulated 2000 hours on the game over 6 years, I love KSP and aspire to become an aerospace engineer because of it.
Data miners have found that there is a lot of the game that is just hidden but is taking up resources in the game. I think KSP 2 is rough but will get better. And might not take as long as we might think
@sandpiper wow you have much anger in you. I bought the game because I think it’ll get better. It’s an investment I am willing to make. Just like KSP 1
omg ksp, universe sandbox and simpleplanes were one of my first games aswell... i was a little kid and i also had a space addiction (i still somewhat do) i have fond memories of it..
I can’t wait for the game to actually work the shaders, although comically unoptimized, are much better looking than modded ksp1 The clouds look great and fit the style of the game better than most modded options The parametric wings are amazing, although an adjustment system more similar to SimplePlanes would be nice The UI does need a lot of work though, for example when you mouse over the speed and altitude displays there isn’t much to indicate that you can switch between the different options, and they also just feel more cluttered, I’m also not a fan of how 2d the new nav ball looks The new part menu is a cool idea, but it needs to be more readable (it also needs to show you how much damn fuel you have, and where it is), it would probably work better as a supplement to the original system rather than a replacement Once the lag, instability, and readability issues are fixed ksp2 is going to be awesome, and I can’t wait for BDarmoury in multiplayer
KSP1 came out in 2011, so by the time you bought it there were several years of post-release development behind it, not to mention the mods. The Early Access version of KSP2 is buggier than I'd like, but I know it'll get better. I've teleported the KSC to Mun orbit, but I've also managed to land at the Mun Arch and the Minmus Statue and return to Kerbin on both missions. My advice is quicksave often.
Don't take too much copium, KSP 1 was not 50 dollars in 2011 and they didn't sell features that don't even exist like colonies, career, interstellar, giant ships. NONE OF THE SELLING POINTS ARE PRESENT IN GAME and the game runs like shit. What did they even do 3 years? the game was supposed to release in 2020. You paid for a new UI, the game is a complete disappointment...
Bruh. KSP 1 was like $15 dollars when it launched. If they are going to charge full game price, the quality needs to be there. KSP is my favorite game of all time, but if Private Division is going to charge full price for this dumpster fire then they are little better than EA.
The first "release" of KSP was after just 6 months of development and was free, by the time KSP hit 3 years of development the same amount of time minimum KSP2 has had we had version 0.23 which was a functional game with career and science modes this was with a team a fraction of the size that Intercept has had
Personally Given the pro's and con's, it runs quite smoothly on my 5 year old 1080ti; on max settings 1440p. Given that the game is in a pre build unfinished state It's got a lot going for it. The hate train has taken full precedence as usual but I bought it on sale at 36% off full price so if you look around you don't have to pay the full RRP But I will agree that the pricing is pretty high still. Ive built a few rockets and flown to a few planets and landed without a hitch. plenty of bugs to fix and the odd textures do pull the fps to 10fps which is quite bad but that is obviously going to be fixed. I look forward to the updates it's just a shame it's taken so long for them to get to this stage.
@@Yeehaw266 not likely to either not at the minute at least. in space my fps is anywhere from 20-108. but realistically the average in flight is 20-30fps. 45fps if im a little further away from planets and 108 looking into the void xD. when the game is finished I'd expect better performance but my card is pretty old and by the time this game is done I'd have upgraded likely anyway. Its running the same even on the top cards that are way more powerful than what im running so I would expect it to be a lot better eventually for most. Even at 20fps the rocket is perfectly fluid and smooth even when flipping out so while far from ideal, its still perfectly playable for me at least.
buying KSP in 2017 was my third purchased pc game, but i played the demo for a whole year before that because i didnt want to spend money as a 12 year old. i love seeing when people have had similar experiences as me. Great video Mr. Facts.
While I agree with what others are saying, as I also am almost certain KSP2 will end up being a great sequel, it doesn't change the fact that releasing now was the wrong thing to do. Nobody expected a finished game on release. We expected a fairly buggy experience. However, I think we expected a bit more for a cost of $50. Really they should have waited another year or two to justify paying that much for an early access game. Because, in its' current form, it is simply not worth anything near that.
I don't think they had the option to delay it any longer, due to both the community getting impatient and the fact that the publishers probably weren't happy with losing money from the long development process when it was only expected to be about a year.
I got Ksp when it got free on the epic games store. I have only just finished development on a rocket that can successfully take me to orbit every time! And now I am on vacation back in my home country for 1 month. Needless to say, I have a lot of ideas and new learning tricks to implement when I get home
Granted, they could have communicated it a lot better, but they clarified before KSP2 EA launch that these specs were for the early access stage and that the minimum/required specs will decrease as they work the engine.
KSP 2 is an alpha early acces, it's supposed to have bugs for you to report them, and expect them to be fixed in the future. You don't buy an early acces alpha game to enjoy it at it's best...
I'm gonna be real. I honestly believe the devs have the care for the game and the community. Take Two Interactive however... Not only did they force Star Theory to shut down and try to vacuum up all the employees into their own little company, but then they probably put them through HELLISH crunch hours and then forced them to release a completely unfinished game. These are the same asshats who own Rockstar games, and ruined GTA 5, and overall abandoned RDR2. But hey, I could be wrong. But I'd like to believe it's take two at fault for this because of their track record.
The best feature of KSP2 is the one click "Quit Game" option. Every time I click this I tell myself "it's ok, it's early access". Then I think "No.....this isn't even pre-alpha"!!!
With regards to the hardware specs, there seem to be some crazy inefficiencies with the rendering pipeline of the game right now. Like you can get almost the exact same performance between a 6700 XT and a 4090. I get the impression they were mainly testing the game on something like a 3070, seeing how low the framerate was, and concluding that less powerful GPUs wouldn't be much good but that hasn't really turned out to be the case. There's a massive bottleneck in the engine somewhere meaning that the GPU is mostly waiting around for the game to give it something to render. To be honest I think the real "minimum" requirement is to have 8GB of VRAM because the game is insatiable for it, so I'm sure there'll be people out there running it on something like an RX 480 Edit: also people have taken for granted how much longevity Pascal GPUs have had, which are really an anomaly. The minimum requirements for KSP 2 cite a GTX 1070 which is 7 years old. For reference, when KSP 1 went into early access in 2013 a 7 year old midrange card was an ATI Radeon X1600
The early versions of KSP were free. Just download and play. It quickly built a ravenous fan base hungry to learn more about space and coding. The game quickly developed with the help of a large community of modders and testers, all working for free in and for something they believed in. It was super fun to be a part of that. Fast forward to 2023 and what we have now is a $50 corporate release of a game based on the original that will NEVER even come close to the original. No way can this current group of corporate approved developers match the intensity and desire of 1000's of players and modders and developers working and playing for fun and internet reputation points. The only thing left for new players to do now is grift off youtube doomer vids. Pathetic.
dont buy it then. wait for it until is developed if you dont want to be part of early access of something everyone realizes what it can become because of success of ksp 1 hence the price. ksp 1 was free because no one knew what the game can become. it was underpriced whole way through the development because of that. and majority of sales where during that time. they lost lot of money because of it. because of if people started buying ksp 1 now, with all dlc's and stuff, they would get like 3 times as much per copy then during early development. but as i said, they didnt know what ksp can become
@@mitjakrybus7820 i dont see 50 euros as some huge loss that you need to feel sorry for. i saw what the state the game is in before i bought it.... defending elon musk lol. im not defending anyone. im saying that you shouldn't buy the game because its early access. and they overpriced very early version because of ksp 1 success. you should wait for them to develop it more until you think its worth. or dont, i dont care.
@@mitjakrybus7820 yet you probably bought and loved "Stray" 39.99 game thats barely 5 hours long. I have over 15 hours in ksp2 so far and itll only go up.
@@mitjakrybus7820 bros feels bad for them because they actually know what early access means and he doesn't, ur funny bro maybe consider doing something you actually are aware of instead of ts.
Really hope that ksp 2 ends up like no man's sky. NMS was hyped up, delayed a lot, and was an outrageous disappointment. But NMS was later on fixed and is now a great game! Let's just hope this willbbe the same for ksp 2.
I have absolutely no issue with a game in its early version that's buggy and poorly optimized. Asking full retail price for this game is where it crosses the line. Especially given that I have little faith in this project under such circumstances. How can we know that Intercept Games won't just go the bare minimum route with this game, grab the money and run? Certainly doesn't help that some annoying issues or even game-breaking bugs never got resolved in KSP. KSP2 needs to be a lot better than this to compete with KSP, modded or otherwise.
from watching all the interviews with devs everywhere. they do seem to care about the title very much. they are also consulting with old development team. i doubt they will take the bare minimum route. i think they want the game to succeed as anyone. ofcourse ksp 2 needs to do a lot better its still early access, ksp 1 was in development for like 12 years to get it to current state. if you were to compare by how long it took to get ksp 2 developed to current state. and compare it with the state of ksp 1 in same amount of development time. you would see that ksp 1 was completely contentless. maybe 10 rocket parts all together, no other planets or mun. no water physics. it was just colored land. etc... but yea it was free. because dev/devs back then didnt realize what ksp can become. it was just silly rocket simulator with silly physics. now devs know what ksp 2 can be so they put full price on it. and dont care if majority of people dont buy it yet.
@@spatrk6634 No dev in the world would say "Yeah, we're just after a quick cash grab, we don't care about the game or our customers". Of course, they will sing high praises of the franchise, make claims to work hard on improving the game and supporting it in the future. Whether it's true or not, we won't be able to tell until they actually do. No Man's Sky was improved by the devs a lot over the years, to a point where they more than made up for the janky release, this is a good example of a dev making good on their promises. There's dozens of games where this is not the case. And even so, if the devs want to pour their heart and soul into this tilte and make it as polished as they can, when their publisher goes "No", that's the end of that. Intercept Games does not enjoy as much of my confidence as Squad would and their outright predatory release scheme of asking a full retail price for a broken pre-alpha title is not boosting that already low confidence. The last 2/3s of your post are... to put it mildly: complete and utter nonsense. @ scond paragraph: KSP2 has been in developement for 4 years. KSP started developement in January 2011 saying it was "completely contentless" in 2015 is a bold-faced lie, given that by that time, you already had career mode, a full solar system, dozens of parts and so on. No Mun or planets in KSP by 2015? How about a video from 2013 (almost exactly 2 years after the very first version of KSP was ever compiled) of someone going to Duna? ua-cam.com/video/Pt41aFBLqVE/v-deo.html Said video also handily disproves your claim about the "colored land" water without physics. If you want to defend KSP2, fine, but don't do so by trashtalking KSP with blatantly false claims. I've played KSP since before the official demo (V0.13.3) was released, I think I played a version between 0.7.3 and 0.10 for the first time, so I know what you wrote is nonsense. @ third paragraph: I don't want to be rude, but what you said is (once more, to put it mildly): bewildering to me. It has to be the most ridiculous excuse made for KSP2 I have read so far. You're basically saying "Well, developers back then didn't know they could rip off their customers with inflated prices nowhere near the value of their product" and you expect that to make KSP2 and its devs look _better?!_ That's some peak Stockholm Syndrome right there mate.
@@h.a.9880 im talking about 2011 version it didnt have mun or anything. and it was first public version. and game started development before 2011. in 2011 first public version released. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp. you are talking complete nonsense. cherry picking the version that was already in development for longer than current version of ksp 2. stockholm syndrome? not at all mate. you are just mad that some people understand what early access is. and how capitalism works. you dont need to buy the game in early access. thats what their marketing team is aiming for. they want you to buy it on full release, when they raise the price to 60 euros if you are afraid that devs will steal your 50 euros, wait for them to develop the game. as it says on the steam page.
@@spatrk6634 *Original post:* _"im talking about 2013 version of the game. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2017 version of ksp."_ *After editing post:* _"im talking about 2011 version and game started development before 2011. in 2011 first public version released. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp."_ *After edditing the post yet again:* _"im talking about 2011 version it didnt have mun or anything. and it was first public version. and game started development before 2011. in 2011 first public version released. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp."_ lol Lots of goalpost-shifting going on here. I will address these points individually: *@Version 1:* As should be clear, I refuted your claim about KSP being "contentless" in 2015. *@Version 2:* My original post already was based on the 2015 version of KSP and I posted a video of the 2013 version that refuted your original claim about KSP being "contentless" after 4 years by showing its advanced state after just 2 years. So upon realizing that, you moved on to goalpost: *@ Version 3:* _"I'm talking about 2011 version"_ No you didn't: _"if you were to compare by how long it took to get ksp 2 developed to current state. and compare it with the state of ksp 1 in same amount of development time."_ was your original claim. So let's do just that: KSP started developement after October 2010, incidently, December 2014 saw the release of KSP's Beta Version that already featured the full Kerbol system, sandbox mode, science mode and a full career mode. It also ran pretty stable and smoothly - especially compared to KSP2's current state. By 2015, we'd get the full game, Version 1.0, released with such features as procedural fairings, specialized Kerbal abilities and so on. KSP2 offers barely any of the features from KSP 1.0. And it runs like shit even on high end PCs. We can't compare a non-existent hypothetical 4-year-in-the-future version of KSP2 with KSP from several years ago. Do you realize how utterly silly your line of argumentation is, when you ask me to wait until 2027 for KSP2 to catch up with or hopefully outperform KSP's state in 2015? Oh boy, sure hope that game will be able to match KSP's state from a decade ago by the end of the decade lmao. _"you are talking complete nonsense. cherry picking the version that was already in development for longer than current version of ksp 2."_ This is thoroughly debunked, I very diligently tailored my reply to your claims as can be seen above. I showed that KSP had more to offer after 2 years than you claim it did after 4 years by even posting a video. After 4 years, KSP2 offers less than KSP did in the same amount of time. Also top notch discussion behaviour: You accuse me of "cherry picking" meanwhile you lie about your original claim and cherry pick the first (even unreleased!) version of KSP yourself and insinuate that KSP by that time was longer in developement than KSP2 is by now, which is evidently false and would have taken less than a minute to check. I know, cause I _did._ _"stockholm syndrome? not at all mate. you are just mad that some people understand what early access is. and how capitalism works. you dont need to buy the game in early access. thats what their marketing team is aiming for. they want you to buy it on full release, when they raise the price to 60 euros"_ How so? I understand perfectly well what Early Access is and that it's a way to monetize the alpha- and beta-testing phase of a game. I've often supported games via Early Access, such as (surprise surprise) KSP, but other titles such as Valheim or Nebulous: Fleet Command as well. Neither of these three games went for full retail price on less than 20% of a game, that's also super buggy and poorly optimized, though. Unless you've got short term memory loss, you should be aware that my issue isn't with a game being monetized during Early Access, it's with the pricetag that this game carries in particular. And my behaviour and reaction to this is applied capitalism at its finest: I look at a product and it's affiliated business practices and decide whether it's worth my money or not. In this case, I come to the conclusion that its current state is nowhere near worth its price and that an inflated price later on with more polished versions is also rather questionable (especially given that there's quite a lot of product cannibalization going on with KSP). At best, I might buy it at 50% discount sometime down the line in a Steam Sale. If optimizing income was the publisher's goal, he'd utterly fail, cause my decision to buy the game has been (at best!) postponed until the game is playable _and_ there's a sale to pick it up cheaper. If I ever even bother to buy it in the first place. I would also question the wisdom of inflating the asking price for a very barebone game, that's plagued with bugs and poor optimization, that makes the game only playable to something like 30% of Steam users. That is going to drive away quite many sales and people that buy an unpolished game for 10 bucks will be much more charitable in their reviews than when they pay full price and receive a turd of a game. For someone who uses the term capitalism so lightly, you surely do not consider the ramifications of the high asking price and the rather significant influence it can have on a game's future and thus profitability. I will gladly explain to you further details. edited: typos
@@h.a.9880 dont act dumb. its not okay to be intellectually dishonest. from the start i was talking about first version of ksp that was available to the public. fact that you want to be dishonest and compare ksp 2 earliest public version with ksp 1 version that was out couple of years already is totally dishonest. i didnt read rest of your comment because you are clearly delusional and have some issues.
my game runs fine on my mid pc but everytime i try to launch a relay satalite to extend comm-net range it randomly loses all comm-net connection when switching stages.
I played KSP1 before the Mun was there. I paid $11 for it. The $50 ask for KSP2 in its current state is a cut-the-losses move by the publisher. I won't keep my hopes up that this will end well given the already troubled development of KSP2. It's the second most appalling early access I've seen.
I have been painfully waiting for it to release, now, I have yet to purchase it for these very reasons. BUT, I do have a bit of faith that it'll get better assuming the publishers don't fuck up (not the devs). Once its patched a bit Ill happily pick it up. Also same, I played KSP in 2012 and it was a big part of my life and one of many reasons I ended up becoming an engineer and currently work at NASA. No I don't care about my grammar in this comment.
KSP 2 is in a minimal viable product state currently with the majority of the infrastructure built in to it's foundation. Anyone buying an early access product should already know that upon purchase you become essentially a playtester for the devs to collect data and feedback from. If the price of admission is too high for you to justify buying it in it's current state, then it's no different to another delay. Just wait till the game is good enough for you to buy. While it's more than likely they were pressured to release into early access by the studio, it doesn't change the fact that now they get to hear everyone's feedback and build things into the game that'll make the game that much better at full release. I'm personally waiting to buy, and I'll be happy to sit back and enjoy the content everyone's making around the game until I feel like the game is worth the price of admission to test it myself.
gotta say... it runs pretty okay on a gtx 1070. even on high, always above 24fps, which is all you usually need for this kinda game. goes above 60 in space and on airless planets.
I wasted several hours building rockets and planes in KSP2, and none of them colud even take off. Bugs kept deleting my savedata, crashing, freezing... Early access of this quality is a bad idea.
waited 2 years for ksp 2 release , and paid my 50 quid as millions of others did. Waited for the download and started the game with tears in my eyes then..... crash got my money back!
I was not allowed to get ksp 1 by my dad but now I got a Christmas present for ksp 2 I was like OMG 3 DAYS and watched the live stream all the way until it came out but when I loaded it in I was greeted with an infinite loading screen and I tried to fix EVERYTHING but it was no use.
@@spatrk6634 That... would have to be outright the dumbest thing they could do bugs are not much of a problem when u barely can launch a rocket at 15 fps lad... lmao
i’m just sticking to modded ksp 1. I have mine in an awesome state where i can literally do anything i want and it looks just as good if not better than ksp 2
This video is why I don’t buy the new game till it has a sequel out already 😂 for example ksp2 just came out so I just bought ksp1 so I have something to play while everyone else is complaining about bugs I have a decent game loaded with content for the next year or 2
Add me to that list of 3080 owners that just uninstalled due to 24 FPS in 4K. Oddly, I get 27 in all high settings and 24 in all low. Just....going to come back in a year when it's ready for human consumption.
i wish games would just release finished sometimes i was also very hyped for this game and weeeell lovely the game wont beable to be played by my poor laptop.
It might be bad now, but have hope! The developers seem *very* dedicated to fixing all the issues! As a matter of fact, a big bug fix update should be coming out soon! Maybe just don’t buy it right now though… but don’t be angry about missing features, help the development team by giving feedback and being supportive.
Bear in mind, if you started playing KSP in 2016, it had been available in early access for five years by that time. It's probably not an entirely fair comparison to compare KSP2 in 2023 to KSP1 in 2011 - the production team are a lot more slick and well funded for KSP2, and they weren't asking full price for KSP1 - but it's definitely unfair to compare a mature full release game to one in early access, especially since the dev team have been loudly telegraphing it's lack of early access features ever since the release date was announced. I kind of think wrestling with the jank and the bugs and the kraken attacks are part of what gave early KSP1 it's charm, but given the snotty community response it looks like that may have been a mistake.
Funny, I have been playing just fine on my 10 year old PC with an i7 3.2 ghz 8 core processor, 32gb of DDR3 RAM, and a 1660ti video card. KSP2 is orders of magnitude smoother than my modded KSP1 current game. And I have found some bugs, but nothing that makes it 'unplayable'.
This was a really good video! I feel that what ruined KSP2 for me is how the devs just focused on the visuals. I understand that they obviously added the basic features of KSP1 into it, but it doesn't feel right. KSP2 is something they wanted a lot of hype for, but that came with a cost, and unfinished game with none of the features they promised...
All the missing features that are being moaned about ... in the KSP 1 All of these features were also missing and were gradually added. The requirements are still being written. The only thing where I can understand the Shitstorm is the price. Just give the game or the developers a few months/years. In any case, it will still be really cool . I'm already enthusiastic about the game and I'm proud to be able to support the developers from hour one. :)
"All of these features were also missing and were gradually added" the funny thing is, there are a ton of features that the KSP1 devs promised that were never added. This is why, for example, there's only one gas giant.
Imagine KSP being your second pc game. I feel old.
Hey I can't help but be 17 years old! And before I played on PC I was on the PS3 with my first actual video game being the "Wall. E" movie tie in game.
@@PlanetaryFacts You’re just a sprout! 🤣 I was 33, when I picked up KSP in 2012. Now I’m 44, and will be much closer to 50, by the time this sequel finally gets off the ground! 😢 It breaks the heart!
By the way, I love your editing, narration, and ability to get to the point! Thumbs up, sir! 👍
@@PlanetaryFacts
PS3 was were you played your first game? Man, mine was N64. The golden age.
@@Cmdr_DarkNite Golden age = Golden Eye
@@anthonyjolson87
I prefer Perfect Dark, but same dev team right? Lol
Most of my rockets are completely unlaunchable. Not because they can’t fly, but because when I press the “Launch” button, the game freezes. I am running a 4090
Yes… because it’s early access and the devs already announced complete overhauls of their optimization systems. Are you dumb or something?
Some people in the community suspect that they had to remove features like interstellar travel, colonies and multiplayer from the build for full release as these features are not ready yet and that broke a bunch of stuff. I hope shit gets fixed soon because it's s just unacceptable asking 50 macaronis to be a beta tester....
@@Gigageorge they were never going to be in the early access. The full release is a good solid 2 years off if not longer
Irrelevant. With this game it's all down to the CPU and optimization....which will come with time and enough patches.
@@TheT0nedude horseshit. You know nothing about multi threads for cores and how they affect programs with high gpu loads
We're lucky KSP2 ever got out of development hell, to be honest.
It had an initial release date of Q1 2020, and changed studios *4 TIMES* (Squad > Star Theory > Private Division > Intercept Games) in the middle of development, with a lot of the work getting lost each time. I can guarantee you that Windows 10 was not a minimum requirement back in Q1 2020. At some point *they had to start over from scratch.* I suspect the only reason it got released in its current state is that during a shareholder meeting it showed up as a glaringly in-the-red project that was initially a 1 year project that has now gone on 4 years old, and there was a threat to cancel the project entirely.
Squad didn't develop ksp2 at all and only developed ksp 1. Only star theory and intercept games developed ksp 2. Private division is the publisher of ksp.
@@fpshobbs All the more valid, I'd say! Star Theory didn't develop the first KSP, and so didn't really have the muscle memory of how to code a game like this. It might as well have been better had Squad did at least *some* work before handing it over.
Also Private Division at large *did* work on the game before Intercept Games was put to the task - that is, while they were in talks to purchase Star Theory, but never did, instead opting to set up the new studio that was named Intercept Games.
My original point stands valid.
@@alexjgilpin This is some "woman with two black eyes telling the cops that despite the domestic abuse, she really loves her husband" kind of thing to say.
There are so many things wrong about this comment I don't even know where to begin...
@@fpshobbs And Squad didn't develop KSP1... Felipe Falanghe(and his hand picked crew) did, and was backed by a passionate, enthusiastic, highly intelligent modding community. It's hard to believe his story isn't shared much anymore, let alone even his name dropped. He was the heart and soul of the original and his treatment by Squad, followed by Take-Two and Intercept Games treatment of the IP... it deserves to fail horribly.
From first hearing about a game to actually buying it runs somewhere from 4-6yrs.. 2 or 3 years prelaunch hype train then 2 or 3 years of patches, fixes and add ons.. somewhere around year 5, it actually becomes a worthwhile purchase
I look forward to playing KSP2 in 2025
if they don't just do a pump and dumb :P
@@Deathbyfartz 😔
I bought it already. The game actually doesn't use the full resources of my computer, and runs at 15-30 fps depending on how big my crafts are and the distance from a celestial body.
And for a simulation game it is very light on the CPU, which if it were more CPU reliant then it wouldn't need an RTX 4090 to get 30fps.
The framework for alot of the roadmap major updates are already in the game, are you sure it wont be worthwhile sooner?
They were testing multilayer a year ago. A lot of the features have had work done on them already, you can see this on their development videos
My first game was KSP too!!! I got it back in 2017, and I still play it to this day. In fact, I'm playing it right now. Although I've only accumulated 2000 hours on the game over 6 years, I love KSP and aspire to become an aerospace engineer because of it.
Data miners have found that there is a lot of the game that is just hidden but is taking up resources in the game. I think KSP 2 is rough but will get better. And might not take as long as we might think
Explains the poor frame rates and bug infestation
@sandpiper damn I must be a moron then.
It does seem like it's running an entire copy of Cyberpunk 2077 in the background...
@sandpiper guess I’m a moron then
@sandpiper wow you have much anger in you. I bought the game because I think it’ll get better. It’s an investment I am willing to make. Just like KSP 1
omg ksp, universe sandbox and simpleplanes were one of my first games aswell... i was a little kid and i also had a space addiction (i still somewhat do)
i have fond memories of it..
"We'll have to wait a few years before we can re-experience the magic of ksp1"
Take two : let me introduce myself...
Thanks for also buying Universe Sandbox.
(I'm the creator)
Cool!
This comment is very unpopular, usually comments like these get flooded with fans.
You absolute Chad. I love US2. Keep up the amazing work!
As far as I understand KSP2s planet renderer has some bloated shaders that take up almost 30ms/frame which is horrible.
The planets do look gorgeous even as stuttery as it does get whenever I look at them lol
The line delivery of “ moon rockets “ at 3:58 was by far the funniest thing I’ve heard all day.
I can’t wait for the game to actually work
the shaders, although comically unoptimized, are much better looking than modded ksp1
The clouds look great and fit the style of the game better than most modded options
The parametric wings are amazing, although an adjustment system more similar to SimplePlanes would be nice
The UI does need a lot of work though, for example when you mouse over the speed and altitude displays there isn’t much to indicate that you can switch between the different options, and they also just feel more cluttered, I’m also not a fan of how 2d the new nav ball looks
The new part menu is a cool idea, but it needs to be more readable (it also needs to show you how much damn fuel you have, and where it is), it would probably work better as a supplement to the original system rather than a replacement
Once the lag, instability, and readability issues are fixed ksp2 is going to be awesome, and I can’t wait for BDarmoury in multiplayer
The music too
0:48 fken killed me 🤣🤣🤣
poor Jeb
Bro... this is my first time stumbling across your channel and its gold. Keep it up bro.
Now you can
KSP1 came out in 2011, so by the time you bought it there were several years of post-release development behind it, not to mention the mods. The Early Access version of KSP2 is buggier than I'd like, but I know it'll get better. I've teleported the KSC to Mun orbit, but I've also managed to land at the Mun Arch and the Minmus Statue and return to Kerbin on both missions. My advice is quicksave often.
Don't take too much copium, KSP 1 was not 50 dollars in 2011 and they didn't sell features that don't even exist like colonies, career, interstellar, giant ships. NONE OF THE SELLING POINTS ARE PRESENT IN GAME and the game runs like shit. What did they even do 3 years? the game was supposed to release in 2020.
You paid for a new UI, the game is a complete disappointment...
Bruh. KSP 1 was like $15 dollars when it launched. If they are going to charge full game price, the quality needs to be there. KSP is my favorite game of all time, but if Private Division is going to charge full price for this dumpster fire then they are little better than EA.
The first "release" of KSP was after just 6 months of development and was free, by the time KSP hit 3 years of development the same amount of time minimum KSP2 has had we had version 0.23 which was a functional game with career and science modes this was with a team a fraction of the size that Intercept has had
KSP 1 was made as a side project by 1 mexican dude in his spare time, KSP 2 was made by a large team with a huge budget.
1. Ksp was cheap af at launch
2. It was made by two guy who didn't know wtf they were doing
Ksp2 is expensive and made by a AAA studio
after the science update the game is very playable and good, i run on a gtx 1050 ti
Can you make a view reviewing the For Science! update? KSP 2 is almost a completely different game now.
I end up rage quitting every time I 'play' due to bugs.
Its just like real life where you have to build redundancy into your ship
Personally Given the pro's and con's, it runs quite smoothly on my 5 year old 1080ti; on max settings 1440p. Given that the game is in a pre build unfinished state It's got a lot going for it. The hate train has taken full precedence as usual but I bought it on sale at 36% off full price so if you look around you don't have to pay the full RRP But I will agree that the pricing is pretty high still. Ive built a few rockets and flown to a few planets and landed without a hitch. plenty of bugs to fix and the odd textures do pull the fps to 10fps which is quite bad but that is obviously going to be fixed. I look forward to the updates it's just a shame it's taken so long for them to get to this stage.
i haven't hit 60 fps once while outside of the vab or tracking station..
@@Yeehaw266 not likely to either not at the minute at least. in space my fps is anywhere from 20-108. but realistically the average in flight is 20-30fps. 45fps if im a little further away from planets and 108 looking into the void xD. when the game is finished I'd expect better performance but my card is pretty old and by the time this game is done I'd have upgraded likely anyway. Its running the same even on the top cards that are way more powerful than what im running so I would expect it to be a lot better eventually for most. Even at 20fps the rocket is perfectly fluid and smooth even when flipping out so while far from ideal, its still perfectly playable for me at least.
buying KSP in 2017 was my third purchased pc game, but i played the demo for a whole year before that because i didnt want to spend money as a 12 year old. i love seeing when people have had similar experiences as me. Great video Mr. Facts.
Well this aged poorly
0:04 he got tf2 and gmod quite nice
While I agree with what others are saying, as I also am almost certain KSP2 will end up being a great sequel, it doesn't change the fact that releasing now was the wrong thing to do.
Nobody expected a finished game on release. We expected a fairly buggy experience. However, I think we expected a bit more for a cost of $50. Really they should have waited another year or two to justify paying that much for an early access game. Because, in its' current form, it is simply not worth anything near that.
I don't think they had the option to delay it any longer, due to both the community getting impatient and the fact that the publishers probably weren't happy with losing money from the long development process when it was only expected to be about a year.
R.I.P. jeb still stuck in duna
I got Ksp when it got free on the epic games store. I have only just finished development on a rocket that can successfully take me to orbit every time! And now I am on vacation back in my home country for 1 month. Needless to say, I have a lot of ideas and new learning tricks to implement when I get home
Granted, they could have communicated it a lot better, but they clarified before KSP2 EA launch that these specs were for the early access stage and that the minimum/required specs will decrease as they work the engine.
I agree with this video plus i just noticed the music in this video was the music from WALL-E on psp and WII
KSP 2 is an alpha early acces, it's supposed to have bugs for you to report them, and expect them to be fixed in the future. You don't buy an early acces alpha game to enjoy it at it's best...
not alpha, just early access, maybe beta? but not alpha
gamers when the pre-release game isnt fully fleshed out and 100% optimized:
I played KSP on my moms MacBook Air. In 2014. Had a blast too. This kind of performance is just sad.
I'm gonna be real. I honestly believe the devs have the care for the game and the community. Take Two Interactive however... Not only did they force Star Theory to shut down and try to vacuum up all the employees into their own little company, but then they probably put them through HELLISH crunch hours and then forced them to release a completely unfinished game. These are the same asshats who own Rockstar games, and ruined GTA 5, and overall abandoned RDR2. But hey, I could be wrong. But I'd like to believe it's take two at fault for this because of their track record.
Yes I CAN and you will not stop me!
The best feature of KSP2 is the one click "Quit Game" option.
Every time I click this I tell myself "it's ok, it's early access". Then I think "No.....this isn't even pre-alpha"!!!
With regards to the hardware specs, there seem to be some crazy inefficiencies with the rendering pipeline of the game right now. Like you can get almost the exact same performance between a 6700 XT and a 4090. I get the impression they were mainly testing the game on something like a 3070, seeing how low the framerate was, and concluding that less powerful GPUs wouldn't be much good but that hasn't really turned out to be the case. There's a massive bottleneck in the engine somewhere meaning that the GPU is mostly waiting around for the game to give it something to render.
To be honest I think the real "minimum" requirement is to have 8GB of VRAM because the game is insatiable for it, so I'm sure there'll be people out there running it on something like an RX 480
Edit: also people have taken for granted how much longevity Pascal GPUs have had, which are really an anomaly. The minimum requirements for KSP 2 cite a GTX 1070 which is 7 years old. For reference, when KSP 1 went into early access in 2013 a 7 year old midrange card was an ATI Radeon X1600
The early versions of KSP were free. Just download and play. It quickly built a ravenous fan base hungry to learn more about space and coding. The game quickly developed with the help of a large community of modders and testers, all working for free in and for something they believed in. It was super fun to be a part of that. Fast forward to 2023 and what we have now is a $50 corporate release of a game based on the original that will NEVER even come close to the original. No way can this current group of corporate approved developers match the intensity and desire of 1000's of players and modders and developers working and playing for fun and internet reputation points. The only thing left for new players to do now is grift off youtube doomer vids. Pathetic.
dont buy it then.
wait for it until is developed if you dont want to be part of early access of something everyone realizes what it can become because of success of ksp 1
hence the price.
ksp 1 was free because no one knew what the game can become.
it was underpriced whole way through the development because of that.
and majority of sales where during that time.
they lost lot of money because of it.
because of if people started buying ksp 1 now, with all dlc's and stuff, they would get like 3 times as much per copy then during early development.
but as i said, they didnt know what ksp can become
@@spatrk6634I'm sorry for your loss of money, but even more for your delusions. Y'all sound like you are defending elon musk here.
@@mitjakrybus7820 i dont see 50 euros as some huge loss that you need to feel sorry for.
i saw what the state the game is in before i bought it....
defending elon musk lol.
im not defending anyone.
im saying that you shouldn't buy the game because its early access.
and they overpriced very early version because of ksp 1 success.
you should wait for them to develop it more until you think its worth.
or dont, i dont care.
@@mitjakrybus7820 yet you probably bought and loved "Stray" 39.99 game thats barely 5 hours long. I have over 15 hours in ksp2 so far and itll only go up.
@@mitjakrybus7820 bros feels bad for them because they actually know what early access means and he doesn't, ur funny bro maybe consider doing something you actually are aware of instead of ts.
Really hope that ksp 2 ends up like no man's sky. NMS was hyped up, delayed a lot, and was an outrageous disappointment. But NMS was later on fixed and is now a great game! Let's just hope this willbbe the same for ksp 2.
I have absolutely no issue with a game in its early version that's buggy and poorly optimized.
Asking full retail price for this game is where it crosses the line.
Especially given that I have little faith in this project under such circumstances. How can we know that Intercept Games won't just go the bare minimum route with this game, grab the money and run? Certainly doesn't help that some annoying issues or even game-breaking bugs never got resolved in KSP.
KSP2 needs to be a lot better than this to compete with KSP, modded or otherwise.
from watching all the interviews with devs everywhere.
they do seem to care about the title very much.
they are also consulting with old development team.
i doubt they will take the bare minimum route.
i think they want the game to succeed as anyone.
ofcourse ksp 2 needs to do a lot better
its still early access, ksp 1 was in development for like 12 years to get it to current state.
if you were to compare by how long it took to get ksp 2 developed to current state.
and compare it with the state of ksp 1 in same amount of development time.
you would see that ksp 1 was completely contentless.
maybe 10 rocket parts all together, no other planets or mun.
no water physics.
it was just colored land. etc...
but yea it was free. because dev/devs back then didnt realize what ksp can become.
it was just silly rocket simulator with silly physics.
now devs know what ksp 2 can be so they put full price on it.
and dont care if majority of people dont buy it yet.
@@spatrk6634 No dev in the world would say "Yeah, we're just after a quick cash grab, we don't care about the game or our customers". Of course, they will sing high praises of the franchise, make claims to work hard on improving the game and supporting it in the future. Whether it's true or not, we won't be able to tell until they actually do.
No Man's Sky was improved by the devs a lot over the years, to a point where they more than made up for the janky release, this is a good example of a dev making good on their promises. There's dozens of games where this is not the case.
And even so, if the devs want to pour their heart and soul into this tilte and make it as polished as they can, when their publisher goes "No", that's the end of that. Intercept Games does not enjoy as much of my confidence as Squad would and their outright predatory release scheme of asking a full retail price for a broken pre-alpha title is not boosting that already low confidence.
The last 2/3s of your post are... to put it mildly: complete and utter nonsense.
@ scond paragraph:
KSP2 has been in developement for 4 years. KSP started developement in January 2011 saying it was "completely contentless" in 2015 is a bold-faced lie, given that by that time, you already had career mode, a full solar system, dozens of parts and so on. No Mun or planets in KSP by 2015? How about a video from 2013 (almost exactly 2 years after the very first version of KSP was ever compiled) of someone going to Duna? ua-cam.com/video/Pt41aFBLqVE/v-deo.html
Said video also handily disproves your claim about the "colored land" water without physics.
If you want to defend KSP2, fine, but don't do so by trashtalking KSP with blatantly false claims. I've played KSP since before the official demo (V0.13.3) was released, I think I played a version between 0.7.3 and 0.10 for the first time, so I know what you wrote is nonsense.
@ third paragraph:
I don't want to be rude, but what you said is (once more, to put it mildly): bewildering to me. It has to be the most ridiculous excuse made for KSP2 I have read so far.
You're basically saying "Well, developers back then didn't know they could rip off their customers with inflated prices nowhere near the value of their product" and you expect that to make KSP2 and its devs look _better?!_
That's some peak Stockholm Syndrome right there mate.
@@h.a.9880 im talking about 2011 version it didnt have mun or anything. and it was first public version.
and game started development before 2011.
in 2011 first public version released.
wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp.
you are talking complete nonsense.
cherry picking the version that was already in development for longer than current version of ksp 2.
stockholm syndrome?
not at all mate.
you are just mad that some people understand what early access is. and how capitalism works.
you dont need to buy the game in early access.
thats what their marketing team is aiming for.
they want you to buy it on full release, when they raise the price to 60 euros
if you are afraid that devs will steal your 50 euros, wait for them to develop the game.
as it says on the steam page.
@@spatrk6634
*Original post:* _"im talking about 2013 version of the game. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2017 version of ksp."_
*After editing post:* _"im talking about 2011 version and game started development before 2011. in 2011 first public version released. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp."_
*After edditing the post yet again:* _"im talking about 2011 version it didnt have mun or anything. and it was first public version. and game started development before 2011. in 2011 first public version released. wait 4 more years and then compare ksp 2 with 2015 version of ksp."_
lol
Lots of goalpost-shifting going on here. I will address these points individually:
*@Version 1:*
As should be clear, I refuted your claim about KSP being "contentless" in 2015.
*@Version 2:*
My original post already was based on the 2015 version of KSP and I posted a video of the 2013 version that refuted your original claim about KSP being "contentless" after 4 years by showing its advanced state after just 2 years. So upon realizing that, you moved on to goalpost:
*@ Version 3:*
_"I'm talking about 2011 version"_ No you didn't:
_"if you were to compare by how long it took to get ksp 2 developed to current state. and compare it with the state of ksp 1 in same amount of development time."_ was your original claim.
So let's do just that:
KSP started developement after October 2010, incidently, December 2014 saw the release of KSP's Beta Version that already featured the full Kerbol system, sandbox mode, science mode and a full career mode. It also ran pretty stable and smoothly - especially compared to KSP2's current state.
By 2015, we'd get the full game, Version 1.0, released with such features as procedural fairings, specialized Kerbal abilities and so on.
KSP2 offers barely any of the features from KSP 1.0. And it runs like shit even on high end PCs.
We can't compare a non-existent hypothetical 4-year-in-the-future version of KSP2 with KSP from several years ago. Do you realize how utterly silly your line of argumentation is, when you ask me to wait until 2027 for KSP2 to catch up with or hopefully outperform KSP's state in 2015? Oh boy, sure hope that game will be able to match KSP's state from a decade ago by the end of the decade lmao.
_"you are talking complete nonsense. cherry picking the version that was already in development for longer than current version of ksp 2."_
This is thoroughly debunked, I very diligently tailored my reply to your claims as can be seen above. I showed that KSP had more to offer after 2 years than you claim it did after 4 years by even posting a video. After 4 years, KSP2 offers less than KSP did in the same amount of time.
Also top notch discussion behaviour: You accuse me of "cherry picking" meanwhile you lie about your original claim and cherry pick the first (even unreleased!) version of KSP yourself and insinuate that KSP by that time was longer in developement than KSP2 is by now, which is evidently false and would have taken less than a minute to check. I know, cause I _did._
_"stockholm syndrome? not at all mate. you are just mad that some people understand what early access is. and how capitalism works. you dont need to buy the game in early access. thats what their marketing team is aiming for. they want you to buy it on full release, when they raise the price to 60 euros"_
How so? I understand perfectly well what Early Access is and that it's a way to monetize the alpha- and beta-testing phase of a game. I've often supported games via Early Access, such as (surprise surprise) KSP, but other titles such as Valheim or Nebulous: Fleet Command as well. Neither of these three games went for full retail price on less than 20% of a game, that's also super buggy and poorly optimized, though.
Unless you've got short term memory loss, you should be aware that my issue isn't with a game being monetized during Early Access, it's with the pricetag that this game carries in particular.
And my behaviour and reaction to this is applied capitalism at its finest:
I look at a product and it's affiliated business practices and decide whether it's worth my money or not.
In this case, I come to the conclusion that its current state is nowhere near worth its price and that an inflated price later on with more polished versions is also rather questionable (especially given that there's quite a lot of product cannibalization going on with KSP). At best, I might buy it at 50% discount sometime down the line in a Steam Sale. If optimizing income was the publisher's goal, he'd utterly fail, cause my decision to buy the game has been (at best!) postponed until the game is playable _and_ there's a sale to pick it up cheaper. If I ever even bother to buy it in the first place.
I would also question the wisdom of inflating the asking price for a very barebone game, that's plagued with bugs and poor optimization, that makes the game only playable to something like 30% of Steam users. That is going to drive away quite many sales and people that buy an unpolished game for 10 bucks will be much more charitable in their reviews than when they pay full price and receive a turd of a game.
For someone who uses the term capitalism so lightly, you surely do not consider the ramifications of the high asking price and the rather significant influence it can have on a game's future and thus profitability. I will gladly explain to you further details.
edited: typos
@@h.a.9880 dont act dumb.
its not okay to be intellectually dishonest.
from the start i was talking about first version of ksp that was available to the public.
fact that you want to be dishonest and compare ksp 2 earliest public version with ksp 1 version that was out couple of years already is totally dishonest.
i didnt read rest of your comment because you are clearly delusional and have some issues.
PacMan was my second computer game. Space invaders #1. So, so old!
About the specs/lag
PDX gamers: first time?
Me when the xeno-compatibility
audio mixing required. balance is too quiet or too loud.
Thanks btw this is my first time making longer videos with my voice in them
my game runs fine on my mid pc but everytime i try to launch a relay satalite to extend comm-net range it randomly loses all comm-net connection when switching stages.
Nobody is going to pay 300ish dollars for an ancient laptop from 2016.
My biggest question is, Why are the dev team so silent about this shite?
with my 1650 ti in 2023 playing with menu screen of latest gen games is achievement for me.
Well, the last part aged like milk
KSP2 makes the average gaming pc look like a toaster oven.
I played KSP1 before the Mun was there. I paid $11 for it. The $50 ask for KSP2 in its current state is a cut-the-losses move by the publisher. I won't keep my hopes up that this will end well given the already troubled development of KSP2. It's the second most appalling early access I've seen.
He was 12 in 2016... This child was born in 2004...
I have been painfully waiting for it to release, now, I have yet to purchase it for these very reasons. BUT, I do have a bit of faith that it'll get better assuming the publishers don't fuck up (not the devs). Once its patched a bit Ill happily pick it up.
Also same, I played KSP in 2012 and it was a big part of my life and one of many reasons I ended up becoming an engineer and currently work at NASA. No I don't care about my grammar in this comment.
0:48 "Slavery" "New Folder"
I still have high hopes for KSP2 after all it’s still in early access
After 6 years it should be way past early access
KSP 2 is in a minimal viable product state currently with the majority of the infrastructure built in to it's foundation. Anyone buying an early access product should already know that upon purchase you become essentially a playtester for the devs to collect data and feedback from. If the price of admission is too high for you to justify buying it in it's current state, then it's no different to another delay. Just wait till the game is good enough for you to buy. While it's more than likely they were pressured to release into early access by the studio, it doesn't change the fact that now they get to hear everyone's feedback and build things into the game that'll make the game that much better at full release. I'm personally waiting to buy, and I'll be happy to sit back and enjoy the content everyone's making around the game until I feel like the game is worth the price of admission to test it myself.
New Planetary Fact???
gotta say... it runs pretty okay on a gtx 1070. even on high, always above 24fps, which is all you usually need for this kinda game. goes above 60 in space and on airless planets.
Perfect Summary.
👀🍿❤️
I wasted several hours building rockets and planes in KSP2, and none of them colud even take off. Bugs kept deleting my savedata, crashing, freezing... Early access of this quality is a bad idea.
excellent video summarizing the state of the game. I do wish the devs iron out this game so we can get the later content without issues
waited 2 years for ksp 2 release , and paid my 50 quid as millions of others did. Waited for the download and started the game with tears in my eyes then..... crash got my money back!
KSP 2 was one of the worst launches ever. It's sad what they've done to the franchise.
I was not allowed to get ksp 1 by my dad but now I got a Christmas present for ksp 2 I was like OMG 3 DAYS and watched the live stream all the way until it came out but when I loaded it in I was greeted with an infinite loading screen and I tried to fix EVERYTHING but it was no use.
Earlier today I played and had no orbit lines so I ended up with an apospsis of 1,000km but 60,000m periapsis on my satellite
LETS GOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! BUCKET LIST ITEM ACHIEVED!!!!!!!!!!!! I AM THE 1,000th LIKE ON YOUR VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!
they promised an update in a "few weeks" really curious how worth the wait will it be and how they fix this "optimisation" 🤣
hope so I'll keep playing ksp 1 until ksp 2 gets less laggy, i cant wait to see the game in the future!!
they will probably be focusing on major mission breaking bugs first
optimization will probably come later.
@@spatrk6634 That... would have to be outright the dumbest thing they could do bugs are not much of a problem when u barely can launch a rocket at 15 fps lad... lmao
@@JohnVibezToday Yeah went back to ksp1 with tons of mods like parallax and blackrack's volumetric clouds and it's pure therapy
@@papascrumpeeh i get around 40 fps at launch lad. which is around the same i get with modded ksp 1.
maybe yo dont meet minimum requirements lad.
lmao
It's scary that I have the same first and second steam games as you
Universe sandbox! I also have that game, and I got it a long time ago aswell.
next video, rescue jeb!!!
ok 👌🏻 but please make the next video making a rescue ship to rescue Jeb on duna
i’m just sticking to modded ksp 1. I have mine in an awesome state where i can literally do anything i want and it looks just as good if not better than ksp 2
Despite its issues I'm having a great time with ksp2
2016 twelve years old....jesus fucking christ im old
And enhanced edition is still not fully updated. I just wanna use eva construction man
Wow, I am actually part of the elite for once, lol!
uhh at 0:48, i do really wonder what that word document is about and why it was on his desktop?
You can
Also when i first played the game...it was like i was waisting time EVEN more than the last one
This video is why I don’t buy the new game till it has a sequel out already 😂 for example ksp2 just came out so I just bought ksp1 so I have something to play while everyone else is complaining about bugs I have a decent game loaded with content for the next year or 2
Add me to that list of 3080 owners that just uninstalled due to 24 FPS in 4K. Oddly, I get 27 in all high settings and 24 in all low. Just....going to come back in a year when it's ready for human consumption.
lol thats my video at 3:14
Update: one month in and it’s so much better. Not perfect yet but significantly better.
i wish games would just release finished sometimes i was also very hyped for this game and weeeell lovely the game wont beable to be played by my poor laptop.
It might be bad now, but have hope! The developers seem *very* dedicated to fixing all the issues! As a matter of fact, a big bug fix update should be coming out soon! Maybe just don’t buy it right now though… but don’t be angry about missing features, help the development team by giving feedback and being supportive.
I bought it and played it once, but not playing again till colonies.
Bear in mind, if you started playing KSP in 2016, it had been available in early access for five years by that time. It's probably not an entirely fair comparison to compare KSP2 in 2023 to KSP1 in 2011 - the production team are a lot more slick and well funded for KSP2, and they weren't asking full price for KSP1 - but it's definitely unfair to compare a mature full release game to one in early access, especially since the dev team have been loudly telegraphing it's lack of early access features ever since the release date was announced.
I kind of think wrestling with the jank and the bugs and the kraken attacks are part of what gave early KSP1 it's charm, but given the snotty community response it looks like that may have been a mistake.
Don’t worry it will be optimized
We have the same first game
Can someone made the biggest ever space station like for example 1/4 earth(kerbal) or half
At least the rocket plumes look good at 10 fps
Ksp 2 is avalible on Xbox soon I actually think it is going to light my house on fire
I'm one of the 4% and still can't play with a smooth experience. And that's AFTER they dropped the specs for lower hardware. lol
Ksp1 could literally run with 15-20fps on an old thinkpad
i have 8 ram and i can play ksp2 like a dream
I bought a 1000 euro gaming pc for fs22 last year, and it can run almost al games on recommended but it can't rund ksp2 at all
the game is pretty nice to play now
ahem *game preview*. incase you forgot
Funny, I have been playing just fine on my 10 year old PC with an i7 3.2 ghz 8 core processor, 32gb of DDR3 RAM, and a 1660ti video card.
KSP2 is orders of magnitude smoother than my modded KSP1 current game.
And I have found some bugs, but nothing that makes it 'unplayable'.
"10 year old pc" *gtx 1660 ti* . but yeah i agree
You should rename your channel nerdygamer1113 💀
This was a really good video!
I feel that what ruined KSP2 for me is how the devs just focused on the visuals.
I understand that they obviously added the basic features of KSP1 into it, but it doesn't feel right.
KSP2 is something they wanted a lot of hype for, but that came with a cost, and unfinished game with none of the features they promised...
even with the recommanded spec its still a mess ... i dont want it anymore not even cracked version
All the missing features that are being moaned about ... in the KSP 1 All of these features were also missing and were gradually added. The requirements are still being written. The only thing where I can understand the Shitstorm is the price. Just give the game or the developers a few months/years. In any case, it will still be really cool .
I'm already enthusiastic about the game and I'm proud to be able to support the developers from hour one. :)
"All of these features were also missing and were gradually added" the funny thing is, there are a ton of features that the KSP1 devs promised that were never added. This is why, for example, there's only one gas giant.