“Golden boy” Harry… he was TOO perfect: catching traitors,and at the missions. Someone should have suspected him. If there was Paul, who was everyone’s favourite, who turned out to be a traitor, it’s not totally impossible for there to be another traitor that people just don’t suspect because they’re popular in the castle. Other than Jaz, no one really suspected him.
It still annoys me that the other players with him at the end didnt guess him when there were so many red flags which were avoided. By the time people realise and spoke out, it was too late.
Agreed. I don't like saying things are 'fixed', but I did wonder if some of the contestants were misdirected a bit... because series 1 was a faithful win, so if series 2 had also been a faithful win, the audience might start thinking a traitor win would never happen, which could damage the future of the show. But now it's 1 - 1 it makes series 3 really interesting.
he was great as a player him and the other traitors just annoyed me only murdering women after the 1st murder of that old guy. every episode I was like "well surely this time they've murdered a man" no. also the fact that they kept recruiting other men and no women was also annoying. I don't want the traitors teurot to be such a sausage fest. I'm glad the host called them out tho. she ate them up. when they said they were recruiting another guy, Claudia said something like "another man? I guess we're going back to olden days" and they were so offended it was very funny
I think their reaction showed it wasn't a conscious thing. It's hard to say it was definitely sexism driving their decisions because they just wanted to win, so it wasn't like they'd have only 'killed' women or only recruited men regardless. It was clear there was strategy behind their decisions - and that went beyond gender. So I think the offence came a bit from that. After all, if you'd interviewed several candidates for a job and really put some thought into who you'd hired, I bet you'd be a bit offended if someone said: "you only chose X because they were male". Not because they're right, but because it plays down the thought process that went into the decision.
one of the best ever Traitors - charming and great at playing the game, a well deserved winner.
“Golden boy” Harry… he was TOO perfect: catching traitors,and at the missions. Someone should have suspected him. If there was Paul, who was everyone’s favourite, who turned out to be a traitor, it’s not totally impossible for there to be another traitor that people just don’t suspect because they’re popular in the castle. Other than Jaz, no one really suspected him.
Agreed. Next series will be interesting as the really nice ones are gonna be suspected pretty early on, even if they're faithful.
It still annoys me that the other players with him at the end didnt guess him when there were so many red flags which were avoided. By the time people realise and spoke out, it was too late.
Agreed. I don't like saying things are 'fixed', but I did wonder if some of the contestants were misdirected a bit... because series 1 was a faithful win, so if series 2 had also been a faithful win, the audience might start thinking a traitor win would never happen, which could damage the future of the show. But now it's 1 - 1 it makes series 3 really interesting.
He played one of the best games right along with Cirie as a traitor.
Good morning. Congratulations to you Harry
Love the traitors
he was great as a player him and the other traitors just annoyed me only murdering women after the 1st murder of that old guy. every episode I was like "well surely this time they've murdered a man" no. also the fact that they kept recruiting other men and no women was also annoying. I don't want the traitors teurot to be such a sausage fest. I'm glad the host called them out tho. she ate them up. when they said they were recruiting another guy, Claudia said something like "another man? I guess we're going back to olden days" and they were so offended it was very funny
I think their reaction showed it wasn't a conscious thing. It's hard to say it was definitely sexism driving their decisions because they just wanted to win, so it wasn't like they'd have only 'killed' women or only recruited men regardless. It was clear there was strategy behind their decisions - and that went beyond gender. So I think the offence came a bit from that. After all, if you'd interviewed several candidates for a job and really put some thought into who you'd hired, I bet you'd be a bit offended if someone said: "you only chose X because they were male". Not because they're right, but because it plays down the thought process that went into the decision.
신흥호 신흥호하며 숨을 쉬었더니 예쁜 여자가 신흥호 사장이다 하게됩니다, 신흥호 사장 정신병잡니다,
성당 4년반 다녔는데, 재미도 없더라구요, 촌놈이라 깔끔한 내부장식 구경하러 다녔습니다,
BBC. !!!!! Jimmy Jimmy Jimmy 🖕💵💵💵
신흥호 신흥호하며 숨을 쉬었더니 예쁜 여자가 신흥호 사장이다 하게됩니다, 신흥호 사장 정신병잡니다,