As a Nikon Z9 shooter, I'm stoked for this firmware update for Canon bc it will force Nikon to join the party. This feature is something we've been asking for too, so it'll be interesting to see if Nikon steps up...
Interesting. Makes sense. But can you shoot it handheld or do you need a tripod? This canon feature makes it seem like the ibis handles the shifting so that you just hold it and it moves the sensor to get the 9 shots. Because if all canon is doing is stacking 9 individual photos in camera then I don't care, cause we can just do that in post.
@@bluecollar8525 I think you need to tripod it for teh Canon too, coz the sensor shift (for doubling the resoltion) is very small (half a pixel to the right ) and it needs to be still.
It is pretty cool, even if it’s a relatively old idea. I believe Pentax has a hand held high res mode, and one that corrects for motion. But if you are stuck on a tripod, I prefer taking a panorama instead. Since you diminish the flaws of the lens. Asking for 400mp of resolution out of a lens is not a small task, especially in the edges. Or better yet, both. Always good to have more flexibility though.
@@mbismbismb It makes 4x the resolution, so on my 16mpx on my Lumix G80 probably not 😂😂 But maybe Olympus or higher end lumix cameras like G9 Gh6 or S1 S5 it could 🤔🤔
This is old technology used in sinar and phase one digital backs, the main difference is that the pixels have different overall value and also their normal shooting condition is taking four or three shots by default to utilise their colour science. Specifically the sinar multishot technology takes four shots with a MASSIVE sensor to individually capture all four colours they use on each pixel with GRBG (Green-Red-Green-Blue) and create an actual colour in combination of the individual values of each colour. In the contrary canon's and Sony's technology takes each shot and each pixel has one colour of which is calculated by the individual value in comparison to it's neighbor pixel's value, then stacks the image for higher resolution and may or may not correct the colours while stacking it (sinar's sensor calculates the colour and delivers an image instead of stacking the images and correcting afterwards leading to higher accuracy and less noise). Ofc canon costs a fraction of the price of sinar and phase one sensors and those two also require a separate body to operate.... sooo yeah.
Sony users get REALLY offended these days if anybody uses cameras other than Sony (Fuji are pretty bad too). I've shot as a pro for 18 years and have always used Canon and have never been tempted to switch. For me Canon have the best reliability, best ergonomics and lenses and are the easiest, best to use. Sonys feel like android phones (kind of cheap feeling, too many menu options and issues but do have some good tech). Nikon were great but again, just a sideways move from Canon (at best, though Canon are now better with their mirrorless). None of the rest are really worth mentioning.
@@77dris i think that panasonic is worth mentioning. Especially for video with their new model with pdaf. Never underestimate or overestimate a camera by its brand(except if its hasselblad which costs as a family can and for that its not preferred by many.)
@@TigaWould okay I'm gonna have to disagree with you here on lenses. Firstly, you can use EF lenses on Sony cameras, they do make adapters for them. Secondly, even if you're counting EF lenses, I would still argue Sony has the best lens selection. There are no RF lenses (and very few EF lenses) that don't have an E-mount equivalent (feel free to prove me wrong). On the flip side, there are some incredible E-mount lenses that don't have any EF or RF equivalents, such as the legendary Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, or the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6. Show me ANY EF/RF superzoom lens with a maximum aperture wider than f/3.5. There's the RF 24-240mm f/4-5.6 but it's trash. No sharpness in the corners whatsoever, regardless of zoom or aperture. Lens reviewer Christopher Frost described it as "a pickup truck powered by a lawn mower engine, with a bunch of turbochargers just to get it going". Sony's 24-240mm isn't superb either but still better than the Canon, and again, they have two other incredible superzooms that have no Canon equivalent. On the telephoto end, Sony has almost a dozen options in the 70 to 600 range, including the G 200-600mm. I'm not even sure EF has that many. The options they do have are great, but RF still has a long way to go with only a 70-200, 100-400, and 100-500. In summary, Sony is the clear winner just from the existence of the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8 and 28-200 f/2.8-5.6, and the Sony G 200-600. Since they're mirrorless lenses, they can't be adapted to any other mount. And since Sony has a 12% stake in Tamron, it's very likely Tamron will continue to reserve their best lenses only for the E mount.
Yeah, only downside is the lenses. Not very fast and the zooms don't have much range. If you reallllly need the extra half stop of dynamic range, okay. But full frame isn't far behind and the lense selection is way better
Pentax came up with proper Pixel Shift imaging back in 2016. This is where Pentax makes its sensor perform something akin to the Foveon sensor in Sigma cameras, which is to capture true colour information, and not interpolate between the RGB pixels. So with the Pentax pixel shift each pixel takes its turn to record individual colour information in a four image pixel shift. The colour information is NOT interpolated, BUT DERIVED from the colour information recorded. The image is assembled in-camera and there is about a 20% increase in resolution but colour information is much cleaner. This Pentax pixel shift IBIS system came out back in 2015 in the K-3ii, and K-1 in 2016. Then hand held pixel shift in their K-P and K-1ii, K-70, K3iii and K-F. Pentax's pixel shift works in-camera extremely well whereas the gigapixel shifts that come from Olympus, Sony and others tends to crash regularly and have to be assembled in computer in hokey software. Olympus was the first in 2013 do make pixel shift gigapixel images. Olympus's does (I think) 15 image pixel shift. Sony's is 7 or maybe more image pixel shift Gigapixel image that isn't assembled in camera, but in its rather bad software, and many times the sequence fails because there's too much time elapsed and movement occurs in the scene. Canons 400mp pixel shift will probably be even worse than Sony's and it most likely can't be assembled in -camera due to file size, and because there's too many images, the rate of image failure will be too high. The more images you're pixel shifting, the more chance there'll be movement in the scene and a failed pixel shift sequence. If Canon bought a 4 image pixel shift (Gigapixel shift) license from Pentax's patent, then their chances will be better for a 400mp image. But like the others except for Pentax, its just a gimmick and no one really uses it because its more fuss then what its worth.
nope - my hass H6400c 400mpx and its Mf and FF takes little time on a standard Mac - admittedly blending exposure of 3 or 4 of those images does take a little longer - but then it should - we photograph heritage pieces for museums
You can do that already with any camera! Just take multiple photos with a small overlap (you could take like 50) and then in Lightroom select all and stitch them as an panorama. After you get an insane high Megapixel image. As far as I know you can do that with as many photos you like but you need a good enough computer to stitch because it will take a while :)
Yes! Exactly! Or even easier just use the ENHANCE feature in Adobe Camera Raw to do the same thing. I've used it and my R6 II files are actually sharper than R5 files.
Yes that’s true but that adds the megapixels artificially (I think) it just enlarges the image. Idk if you could do that over and over to get a ultra high res one with 200+megapixels Wouldn’t that also introduce some artifacts!?
@@Snolos it would artifacts will definitely be present. Reminds me of how people with tion individuals who by diffusion filters. When the chief person will be like oh I could do that with hairspray in a dirty filter lol. Just not the same if you're doing it in camera
Your only real advantage would be 1-1/3 stop extra light and dynamic range. If you're shooting in dark lighting without a tripod and you need it for that purpose, then yes. Otherwise no
This is my question. Under what circumstances is this helpful or necessary? I'm already taking cRaw images to save on storage size. (Should I have purchased the R6 instead of the R5 if I'm doing that?? 😂)
Wait really? Isn't alignment an issue and the shot ends up blurry? Also, I was under the impression that the multi-shots get you more dynamic range than many single shots
Would like to see this “mode” in action. Are there graphic aids on the screen or in the viewfinder to help line things up? Because it sounds like just stitching multiple photos together but this feature must add something?
You set it down on a tripod and enter the mode. then you just press the shutter button and let the camera do it‘s thing. It‘s shifting the Sensor on it‘s own by very very very small increments. The picture you get is already the final resolution, no postprocessing needed. At least that‘s how every other camera with such a mode does it
In the professional world, a pivotal transition from full frame sensor size to the larger medium format size. While the majority of images are viewed on a 6" inch screen.
But do they match? 400 megapixels? The only one I now has a higher resolution and it's not aa custom endeavor is the H6D-400C and on paper, the difference is very little. Clearly, the reality is not paper.
@@jaimeduncan6167 20Mp MTF sensor at 50 to 80Mp. Now hypothetically lets do the math equivalency given the format and pixel density; That FF Olympus sensor would be about a 62Mp sensor given it's pixel pitch. Canon's 45Mp sensor to 400Mp os a x 8.9 factor. That would make an equivalent FF Olympus a high res mode at 551.8M pixels. I think Olympus pretty much figured it out a decade ago with MFT sensors. Canon and Sony aught to thank Olympus for that technology for starters.... and no I am not a MFT shooter, just stating reality.
I wouldn't say it's the highest resolution sir. Because GFX100S also does 400 megal pixel images by also doing the same shifting. Except you'll still get higher resolution with the medium format sensor and greater detail.
Although 400mp sounds cool - for professionals. It's pretty pointless to regular photographers if you're not making GIANT prints.. If you're getting into photography, trust me the older DSLRs are still great. Something like a Nikon D750 is still a fantastic camera.
You present this as a different technology from Sony (“some stacking”) which it isn’t. Both systems shift the sensor around and make multiple pictures to achieve higher stacked resolution. Only difference is Sony does it for years already. Making this technology very much available. Also, IBIS sensors don’t use motors.
@@TigaWould Well, sorry for not so clear answer. My point is that Hasselblad also have 400mpix the same way as Canon will do. Hasselblad H6 Multishot has 100Mp wile Canon has 45Mp. Both shifting the sensor or the pixels with the same result. My point was that Canon R5 is not the only Camera that do it. Niether of the cameras will be able to take a 400MP photo in one go. they need to be standing 100% still or you will have a blurry immage.
@@TigaWould Yes, and the H6 and GFX100 is a lot older. So not weird that the R5 is better in some areas. Will be interesting if the Hasselblad X2D 100MP will have this feature in future. Sure, the R5 is a bit cheaper than the X2. But also 2 different markets. Still, non of them can’t make it single shot. Then a fast and advanced AF system doesn’t matter because you have to place it still on a solid ground. It will be mostly used i museums, architecture and similar. Even slightest vibration might cause blurred images. Hasselblad has a warning that if there is a vibration or something that doesn’t match the previous photo so you know if the end result risk to be blurry. Maybe a image stabilizer would help some. So a outdoor photo will often not work because of wind movement. So the much advanced AF might not make any difference. Those who really need the Medium Format will get it. Or they will get the R5 or another camera. Both are great for what they do. There are very few that need a Medium format camera. Actually, my opinion is that few really need a R5, but will get it because they want it. Me for example would get 1 or 2 used 1DX mark 2 or 3 if I would start working again. If I would ever need 100 or 400, I would rent or buy a Hasselblad. But I guess I am little biased as a Swede as I want to buy things made here as much as possible.
Wait...they still use the multi-shot technology??? In Film photography we call it mult shot & that already exist when the first 35mm film was launched to the market to fullfil the need of some people that use the 35 mm but want the image to be as good as 120 film format. That's work by zooming to an object then take some frames by nX x nY (nX= amount of frames from X axis, nY= amount of frames from Y axis). E.g. 3 x 3 that's means 9 frames consist of 3 frames from right to left or vice versa & 3 frames from above to bottom or vice versa.
Hey I am from India and I do phone photography but I want to buy a camera I am a student so wanted to buy cheap a good camera..and also good for beginners.
36x24mm adox 20 film is equivalent to ~800Mpx. No need to take several shot, one is enough. It is available with a +20 years old analog camera for 30$ + 5$ for the film. But photography is not about gear and Mpx so who care ???
Im not sure but i think Olympus/OM System had this Feature for mans years OM-1 (20MP Sensor) has 50MP Handheld HiRes and 80MP Tripod Photos Olympus has many great Features and usally before anyone else But unfortunateiy only the big three(Sony, Canon, Nikkon) are praised. Fullframe......
Sony has had the multi pixel shift for years. You still need a tripod and a non moving subject. Great for landscapes, not really applicable to anything else
Maybe someone can tell me: My phone, which is already a few generations old, can take 104MP photos. Now, I understand most people just don't require this level of detail in their photos (since very few people work in a field where they blow their images up to the size of billboards, or need to zoom in to a small detail). The question is, why is my now older phone is capable of this level of MP, but there are no dslr (or mirrorless variants) on the market that can work at this level?
He is wrong, but only for the tiniest of factors, The resolution is 99.74% of the resolution of the H6D-400C which is a pretty old medium format camera. The camera is still for sale.
Next year.
Apple: Introducing iPhone 15 with 10,000 mega pixel.
But 2mm sensor
I'd buy that
Apple storage 😢
Oh they better put in a thunderbolt port for that 😂
Definitely not apple. More like Xiaomi budget phones.
Lmao
As a Nikon Z9 shooter, I'm stoked for this firmware update for Canon bc it will force Nikon to join the party. This feature is something we've been asking for too, so it'll be interesting to see if Nikon steps up...
The GFX 100S already has a 404MP IBIS hi-res mode
Interesting. Makes sense. But can you shoot it handheld or do you need a tripod? This canon feature makes it seem like the ibis handles the shifting so that you just hold it and it moves the sensor to get the 9 shots. Because if all canon is doing is stacking 9 individual photos in camera then I don't care, cause we can just do that in post.
@@bluecollar8525 I can assure you both cameras would require a tripod for this feature. It takes a few seconds to do it.
@bluecollar8525, when you stacked photos, you should use a tripod.
@@bluecollar8525 I think you need to tripod it for teh Canon too, coz the sensor shift (for doubling the resoltion) is very small (half a pixel to the right ) and it needs to be still.
In which file format is the 400MP pic saved?
2 Weeks ago I guessed this. That video is here: ua-cam.com/users/shortsvCusI1iWax4
Well it was on canonrumours 2 weeks ago you mean 😁
Never mentions LUMIX… we got photo stacking too ya know!! 😂
True, but it doesn't get you 400mp. I think the point is just how many mp you get here
And in body not external...
@@bluecollar8525 eos r5 is newer than lumix s1r
but eos r5 is cool enough
*laughs in 2016 Pentax K-1*
I saw Olympus here in comments already
😂
It is pretty cool, even if it’s a relatively old idea. I believe Pentax has a hand held high res mode, and one that corrects for motion.
But if you are stuck on a tripod, I prefer taking a panorama instead. Since you diminish the flaws of the lens. Asking for 400mp of resolution out of a lens is not a small task, especially in the edges.
Or better yet, both. Always good to have more flexibility though.
Those red anchors are life savers for me I have so much trouble taking in and off my neck strap 😂 plus they kinda look cool 😂😂
Don't all Lumix cameras have this feature? 🤔🔥
And Olympus, now om system. My EM5 mk 2 from 2015 has this
400 megapixels too?
@@mbismbismb It makes 4x the resolution, so on my 16mpx on my Lumix G80 probably not 😂😂 But maybe Olympus or higher end lumix cameras like G9 Gh6 or S1 S5 it could 🤔🤔
@@PatrikHrabovec nope...the lumix doesnt take 9 shots in total 400 megapixels, unless u want to stake manually on LR or Photoshop
This is old technology used in sinar and phase one digital backs, the main difference is that the pixels have different overall value and also their normal shooting condition is taking four or three shots by default to utilise their colour science.
Specifically the sinar multishot technology takes four shots with a MASSIVE sensor to individually capture all four colours they use on each pixel with GRBG (Green-Red-Green-Blue) and create an actual colour in combination of the individual values of each colour. In the contrary canon's and Sony's technology takes each shot and each pixel has one colour of which is calculated by the individual value in comparison to it's neighbor pixel's value, then stacks the image for higher resolution and may or may not correct the colours while stacking it (sinar's sensor calculates the colour and delivers an image instead of stacking the images and correcting afterwards leading to higher accuracy and less noise).
Ofc canon costs a fraction of the price of sinar and phase one sensors and those two also require a separate body to operate.... sooo yeah.
Hi Anthony. Just curious. Why do you use Canon and not Sony cameras or any other brand? Maybe you could make a video about why. 😄
Sony users get REALLY offended these days if anybody uses cameras other than Sony (Fuji are pretty bad too).
I've shot as a pro for 18 years and have always used Canon and have never been tempted to switch. For me Canon have the best reliability, best ergonomics and lenses and are the easiest, best to use. Sonys feel like android phones (kind of cheap feeling, too many menu options and issues but do have some good tech). Nikon were great but again, just a sideways move from Canon (at best, though Canon are now better with their mirrorless).
None of the rest are really worth mentioning.
@@77dris i think that panasonic is worth mentioning. Especially for video with their new model with pdaf.
Never underestimate or overestimate a camera by its brand(except if its hasselblad which costs as a family can and for that its not preferred by many.)
@@77dris you’ve shot canon for 18 years and never switched. So you can’t really speak on any other camera other than Canon. End of story
@@TigaWould okay I'm gonna have to disagree with you here on lenses. Firstly, you can use EF lenses on Sony cameras, they do make adapters for them. Secondly, even if you're counting EF lenses, I would still argue Sony has the best lens selection.
There are no RF lenses (and very few EF lenses) that don't have an E-mount equivalent (feel free to prove me wrong). On the flip side, there are some incredible E-mount lenses that don't have any EF or RF equivalents, such as the legendary Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, or the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6. Show me ANY EF/RF superzoom lens with a maximum aperture wider than f/3.5.
There's the RF 24-240mm f/4-5.6 but it's trash. No sharpness in the corners whatsoever, regardless of zoom or aperture. Lens reviewer Christopher Frost described it as "a pickup truck powered by a lawn mower engine, with a bunch of turbochargers just to get it going". Sony's 24-240mm isn't superb either but still better than the Canon, and again, they have two other incredible superzooms that have no Canon equivalent.
On the telephoto end, Sony has almost a dozen options in the 70 to 600 range, including the G 200-600mm. I'm not even sure EF has that many. The options they do have are great, but RF still has a long way to go with only a 70-200, 100-400, and 100-500.
In summary, Sony is the clear winner just from the existence of the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8 and 28-200 f/2.8-5.6, and the Sony G 200-600. Since they're mirrorless lenses, they can't be adapted to any other mount. And since Sony has a 12% stake in Tamron, it's very likely Tamron will continue to reserve their best lenses only for the E mount.
@@TigaWould bruh... i thought dude had a point and gave him a like, then i had to take it back after reading your essay! 😂 PURE FACTS SPOKEN!!!
GFX100 is a pretty cool camera
Cool, but expensive! 😛
Esthetically, I wish the camera and lenses were better designed.
@@AnthonyGugliotta here is UK this isn't that much of a difference in price between gfx 100s and a canon r5
But for me both are expensive 😂
Yeah, only downside is the lenses. Not very fast and the zooms don't have much range. If you reallllly need the extra half stop of dynamic range, okay. But full frame isn't far behind and the lense selection is way better
Pentax came up with proper Pixel Shift imaging back in 2016. This is where Pentax makes its sensor perform something akin to the Foveon sensor in Sigma cameras, which is to capture true colour information, and not interpolate between the RGB pixels. So with the Pentax pixel shift each pixel takes its turn to record individual colour information in a four image pixel shift. The colour information is NOT interpolated, BUT DERIVED from the colour information recorded. The image is assembled in-camera and there is about a 20% increase in resolution but colour information is much cleaner. This Pentax pixel shift IBIS system came out back in 2015 in the K-3ii, and K-1 in 2016. Then hand held pixel shift in their K-P and K-1ii, K-70, K3iii and K-F. Pentax's pixel shift works in-camera extremely well whereas the gigapixel shifts that come from Olympus, Sony and others tends to crash regularly and have to be assembled in computer in hokey software.
Olympus was the first in 2013 do make pixel shift gigapixel images. Olympus's does (I think) 15 image pixel shift.
Sony's is 7 or maybe more image pixel shift Gigapixel image that isn't assembled in camera, but in its rather bad software, and many times the sequence fails because there's too much time elapsed and movement occurs in the scene.
Canons 400mp pixel shift will probably be even worse than Sony's and it most likely can't be assembled in -camera due to file size, and because there's too many images, the rate of image failure will be too high. The more images you're pixel shifting, the more chance there'll be movement in the scene and a failed pixel shift sequence. If Canon bought a 4 image pixel shift (Gigapixel shift) license from Pentax's patent, then their chances will be better for a 400mp image. But like the others except for Pentax, its just a gimmick and no one really uses it because its more fuss then what its worth.
it still won’t be as good as a Phase One or Hasselblad stacked medium format sensor though.
how many MP?
But much much much miles better than any FF competitors 😏
Thats like saying the new honda civic still won't be as good as a Koenigsegg.
A very niche feature for a very select few situations. as anything in your scene can’t move in even the least little bit to accomplish that resolution
Yup. Tripod only.
Bringing this tech to APC cameras would be an absolute game changer
Take a look at olympus... Done already
Fuji X-H2 has it
Great.
A 400 MP file will require a supercomputer from MIT for editing in Lightroom.
°
nope - my hass H6400c 400mpx and its Mf and FF takes little time on a standard Mac - admittedly blending exposure of 3 or 4 of those images does take a little longer - but then it should - we photograph heritage pieces for museums
400 MP🔥🔥
btw, bro if you make such good videos about cannon cameras, their sales will skyrocket
You can do that already with any camera!
Just take multiple photos with a small overlap (you could take like 50) and then in Lightroom select all and stitch them as an panorama.
After you get an insane high Megapixel image.
As far as I know you can do that with as many photos you like but you need a good enough computer to stitch because it will take a while :)
Yes! Exactly! Or even easier just use the ENHANCE feature in Adobe Camera Raw to do the same thing. I've used it and my R6 II files are actually sharper than R5 files.
Yes that’s true but that adds the megapixels artificially (I think) it just enlarges the image.
Idk if you could do that over and over to get a ultra high res one with 200+megapixels
Wouldn’t that also introduce some artifacts!?
@@Snolos it would artifacts will definitely be present.
Reminds me of how people with tion individuals who by diffusion filters. When the chief person will be like oh I could do that with hairspray in a dirty filter lol.
Just not the same if you're doing it in camera
@@Snolos that's true. You would have to zoom in farther for each individual photo to get the same wide field of view
I’m sorry if I’m mistaken, so basically its HDR?
what lens in this video?
I hat kind of camera did you use to record this video ?
Numbers are cool, but how is the sensor?
Any word on other cameras getting this update? R6 ?
So Canon R6 isn't getting this?
Is the Canon R6 superior to the R5?
I have a xt30 would you suggest me to upgrade to a Sony a7iv??
Your only real advantage would be 1-1/3 stop extra light and dynamic range. If you're shooting in dark lighting without a tripod and you need it for that purpose, then yes. Otherwise no
@@bluecollar8525 i do a lot of concert photography but can’t use for example a nice zoom lens cause a 2.8 would still be darker
Same for the R5 C?
Will it come to not all models with IBIS, but to those with digital or even no image stabilization?
Right now it looks like the R5 only
@@AnthonyGugliotta aw that sucks. hopefully their other cameras like the R6 lineup get this feature in the future.
what do you need all that resolution for exactly?
This is my question. Under what circumstances is this helpful or necessary? I'm already taking cRaw images to save on storage size. (Should I have purchased the R6 instead of the R5 if I'm doing that?? 😂)
You can do pixel shift with any camera by taking a burst of photos, then using any free photoshop action for this purpose.
Wait really? Isn't alignment an issue and the shot ends up blurry? Also, I was under the impression that the multi-shots get you more dynamic range than many single shots
Would like to see this “mode” in action. Are there graphic aids on the screen or in the viewfinder to help line things up? Because it sounds like just stitching multiple photos together but this feature must add something?
You set it down on a tripod and enter the mode. then you just press the shutter button and let the camera do it‘s thing. It‘s shifting the Sensor on it‘s own by very very very small increments. The picture you get is already the final resolution, no postprocessing needed. At least that‘s how every other camera with such a mode does it
@@mariuswickli3206 That's pretty cool.
What about R6? Same IBIS
Impressive mode for 240 megapixel or 400 megapixel. Buckhannon is still plagued with some crappy lenses compared to Sony. But very cool
Olympus has been doing this for years!
I wonder if this option will be available for the R6 as well?
Does it take old Canon lenses?
no, Canon changed their mount when they went mirrorless
The only company to keep the same mount is Pentax....
In the professional world, a pivotal transition from full frame sensor size to the larger medium format size. While the majority of images are viewed on a 6" inch screen.
R5C too?
You can stack 2000 photos in photoshop and lightroom it’s a gimmick doesn’t really work like having an actual 200mp sensor
I have an R5, I want his but will believe it when it comes out.
Idk if u want file sizes that big lol.
@@slurp3194 you would start measuring image size in CF/SD cards per hour lmao
Olympus Cameras has a high resolution shot since 10 years. 🤷🏼♂️😅
But do they match? 400 megapixels? The only one I now has a higher resolution and it's not aa custom endeavor is the H6D-400C and on paper, the difference is very little. Clearly, the reality is not paper.
@@jaimeduncan6167 20Mp MTF sensor at 50 to 80Mp.
Now hypothetically lets do the math equivalency given the format and pixel density; That FF Olympus sensor would be about a 62Mp sensor given it's pixel pitch. Canon's 45Mp sensor to 400Mp os a x 8.9 factor. That would make an equivalent FF Olympus a high res mode at 551.8M pixels. I think Olympus pretty much figured it out a decade ago with MFT sensors. Canon and Sony aught to thank Olympus for that technology for starters.... and no I am not a MFT shooter, just stating reality.
I wouldn't say it's the highest resolution sir. Because GFX100S also does 400 megal pixel images by also doing the same shifting. Except you'll still get higher resolution with the medium format sensor and greater detail.
Doesn’t the H6d-400 have 400 megapixels?
If it’s not available how is it the highest resolution cameras if there already AVAILABLE 400 megapixels
I hope this comes to the R6II ! 😮
Probably the hottest camera as well…… literally
LMAO 😂😂
A1 and a7R V
Took them titles lol
Although 400mp sounds cool - for professionals.
It's pretty pointless to regular photographers if you're not making GIANT prints.. If you're getting into photography, trust me the older DSLRs are still great. Something like a Nikon D750 is still a fantastic camera.
25,000 pixels by 16,000 pixels… that is absolutely bonkers
You present this as a different technology from Sony (“some stacking”) which it isn’t. Both systems shift the sensor around and make multiple pictures to achieve higher stacked resolution.
Only difference is Sony does it for years already. Making this technology very much available.
Also, IBIS sensors don’t use motors.
sure
That noise in the begin is gorgeous.
P.S. any IBIS in-body image stack is garbage.
You should've mentioned that it's already implemented in Fujifilm, even their X-T5 can create 160MP photo
The GFX100S does this and it’s already 400 megapixels. I believe it’s 404 to be exact. Either way, Fuji beat Canon to the punch.
Hasselblad has alos the H6D 400mpix version.
@@TigaWould Well, sorry for not so clear answer. My point is that Hasselblad also have 400mpix the same way as Canon will do. Hasselblad H6 Multishot has 100Mp wile Canon has 45Mp. Both shifting the sensor or the pixels with the same result. My point was that Canon R5 is not the only Camera that do it. Niether of the cameras will be able to take a 400MP photo in one go. they need to be standing 100% still or you will have a blurry immage.
@@TigaWouldAnd I think Fujifilms GFX100 also have this feature
@@TigaWould Yes, and the H6 and GFX100 is a lot older. So not weird that the R5 is better in some areas. Will be interesting if the Hasselblad X2D 100MP will have this feature in future. Sure, the R5 is a bit cheaper than the X2. But also 2 different markets. Still, non of them can’t make it single shot. Then a fast and advanced AF system doesn’t matter because you have to place it still on a solid ground. It will be mostly used i museums, architecture and similar. Even slightest vibration might cause blurred images. Hasselblad has a warning that if there is a vibration or something that doesn’t match the previous photo so you know if the end result risk to be blurry. Maybe a image stabilizer would help some. So a outdoor photo will often not work because of wind movement. So the much advanced AF might not make any difference. Those who really need the Medium Format will get it. Or they will get the R5 or another camera. Both are great for what they do. There are very few that need a Medium format camera. Actually, my opinion is that few really need a R5, but will get it because they want it. Me for example would get 1 or 2 used 1DX mark 2 or 3 if I would start working again. If I would ever need 100 or 400, I would rent or buy a Hasselblad. But I guess I am little biased as a Swede as I want to buy things made here as much as possible.
The Canon R5 is now the highest resolution camera that is CURRENTLY on the market! ✨
Soooo the feature is not available yet, but-....
🤩😑
To reach that resolution, the sensor has to shift 3x its size in each direction. How is that even possible with such a tiny movement?
Olympus had this for more than 7 years
Ehhh tried the multishots on everything from a GFX 100 to S5 II... none of them add any detail it's kind of a waste of storage space
Fujifilm GFX100S PixelShift
Wait...they still use the multi-shot technology??? In Film photography we call it mult shot & that already exist when the first 35mm film was launched to the market to fullfil the need of some people that use the 35 mm but want the image to be as good as 120 film format. That's work by zooming to an object then take some frames by nX x nY (nX= amount of frames from X axis, nY= amount of frames from Y axis). E.g. 3 x 3 that's means 9 frames consist of 3 frames from right to left or vice versa & 3 frames from above to bottom or vice versa.
I wonder if they can do that for the R6II too?
Will the R6 get an Ultra Hi-res mode? #photography
Do you think it would be available on the R6II?
Maybe. Word on the rumor mill is that they’re adding this specifically to the R5 to extend its product life and keep people interested.
Him: "...is NOW the highest resolution camera..."
Him in the same clip: "..it's not available YET..." 🤣
Goodbye to my memory card 😂. However, amazing concept.
the phase one iXM-RS280F does 280mp single shot
The nikon z9 has 0.7 or 0.6 more megapixels
Where I saw the resolution, I spit my coffee on my phone. Like damn thats a lot.
You’ll never….. EVER, need 400MP 🤦♂️
meanwhile, 8x10 film casually being scanned at over 700 megapixels...
That shit's expensive AF per shot though
cool, but fujifilm comed up with this more than 6 month ago on their apsc xh2 for achieving 160 mpx phots
I think Sony actually had it first... but I might be wrong
@@AnthonyGugliotta A7RIV and A1 both had it years before Fuji
@@AnthonyGugliotta oh nice 👍 thanks, Canon lately seams that just try to keep up
Its can only be used in studios with only static subjects
Hey I am from India and I do phone photography but I want to buy a camera I am a student so wanted to buy cheap a good camera..and also good for beginners.
i use the nikon d3 it full frame 12 mp I love the camera
that kind of resolution is almost near as the Human's eye resolution!
What a great Idea from Canon we all need new Computers for Postproduction. I think i realy need 400mgpx for Insta😂
36x24mm adox 20 film is equivalent to ~800Mpx. No need to take several shot, one is enough. It is available with a +20 years old analog camera for 30$ + 5$ for the film. But photography is not about gear and Mpx so who care ???
imagine using a macro lens with that much resolution.
I want to see atoms at the lowest level
But is not available?
Fuji and Hasselblad already have 400mp mode
The Fuji X-T5 and X-H2 already has 150mp pixel shift ibis image resolution at 1800 dollars.
Funfact: these days res are high enough to the point where mp count doesnt matter, so… it doesnt rly matter 😊
Crazy haha
If the 9 shot IBIS isn’t available yet, then the R5 is not highest on the market. Weird.
Im not sure but i think Olympus/OM System had this Feature for mans years
OM-1 (20MP Sensor) has 50MP Handheld HiRes and 80MP Tripod Photos
Olympus has many great Features and usally before anyone else
But unfortunateiy only the big three(Sony, Canon, Nikkon) are praised.
Fullframe......
Sony has had the multi pixel shift for years. You still need a tripod and a non moving subject. Great for landscapes, not really applicable to anything else
Pixel Shift, basically. But I prefer saying Sensor Shift 😄😄
Lumix s5 ii does that...and does it right now
Maybe someone can tell me:
My phone, which is already a few generations old, can take 104MP photos.
Now, I understand most people just don't require this level of detail in their photos (since very few people work in a field where they blow their images up to the size of billboards, or need to zoom in to a small detail).
The question is, why is my now older phone is capable of this level of MP, but there are no dslr (or mirrorless variants) on the market that can work at this level?
Yeah you're gonna need a quantum computer to process a 400mp photo.
He is wrong, but only for the tiniest of factors, The resolution is 99.74% of the resolution of the H6D-400C which is a pretty old medium format camera. The camera is still for sale.
Resolution is overrated IMO 🤷♂️ but it keeps the competition moving so I’m good with it!
This is like Super Res Zoom on Google Pixel?
First time you mention sony you forget to mention lumix hahahaha
the color science tho
Ok but what about a phase one camera?
The cost difference of the Phase one makes it unattainable for your average photographer.
What can you view 100 Mpixel on…?
Fuji xh2 has it already
Still a JPEG, so why should i use it as someone who paid like 5000$ for a camera?
So that is 32K resolution?!
GH6. Already done.