While I will not be visiting your Warhol video, I enjoyed your approach on this one. The Warhol matter is part of a much larger discussion about art. As a passionate photographer since decades ago, I have spent a great deal of time thinking about painting, music, poetry and other arts, to try to newly discover more connections between their means of inspiring their creators and their audiences. This, in my view, is irreplaceable and essential. Many times, it is most valuable to consider composition in a non-visual medium, such as literature or poetry. How does one identify and develop what is primary? Does one portray a character from only the outside or also from inside, and how? How is the element of surprise used? How is attention drawn to something or someone, subtly or less so? These are questions that free us from the alleged "rules of composition" that, so often it seems, are either geometric structures that don't apply to what we need to convey, or are smaller or larger collections of phenomena (e.g., high-contrast) that may lead or attract the eye but tell us nothing about how we might use them intelligently. Best wishes as you continue your journey.
I liked this. I'm a fan of mr. Hopper which is why I clicked on to the video but I stayed with you because I like the connections you make. Also I've always been an outsider prone to extended periods of angst, but we won't go into that. Regards Jake Everyman.
Congrats 1k!
Thanks
While I will not be visiting your Warhol video, I enjoyed your approach on this one. The Warhol matter is part of a much larger discussion about art.
As a passionate photographer since decades ago, I have spent a great deal of time thinking about painting, music, poetry and other arts, to try to newly discover more connections between their means of inspiring their creators and their audiences. This, in my view, is irreplaceable and essential. Many times, it is most valuable to consider composition in a non-visual medium, such as literature or poetry. How does one identify and develop what is primary? Does one portray a character from only the outside or also from inside, and how? How is the element of surprise used? How is attention drawn to something or someone, subtly or less so?
These are questions that free us from the alleged "rules of composition" that, so often it seems, are either geometric structures that don't apply to what we need to convey, or are smaller or larger collections of phenomena (e.g., high-contrast) that may lead or attract the eye but tell us nothing about how we might use them intelligently.
Best wishes as you continue your journey.
Very thought provoking, weaving photography , paintings and cinematography together- Great
I love your videos! Please create more of these :)
I liked this. I'm a fan of mr. Hopper which is why I clicked on to the video but I stayed with you because I like the connections you make. Also I've always been an outsider prone to extended periods of angst, but we won't go into that. Regards Jake Everyman.
Good video, been captivated by Hopper since I first saw Nighthawks and just had to find out more about his work.
Interesting video - subscribed!