RX 6400 vs. GTX 1050 Ti | Low End Gpu Test in 2022
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 тра 2022
- Games : @1080p
Far Cry 6 0:01
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1:01
Watch Dogs Legion 2:08
Horizon Zero Dawn 3:17
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4:25
Hitman 3 5:32
Cyberpunk 2077 6:38
Resident Evil Village 7:46
PC Specs:
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4G GDDR5
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6400 EAGLE 4G GDDR6
intel Core i9-12900K
Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Hero
RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 5200 MHz
Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB
CPU Cooler: Corsair iCue H150i RGB PRO
Corsair RM850x White 80PLUS Gold 850W - Ігри
The 6400 would have been such a great card for gamers on a very tight budget if not for the lack of a decent media engine on it
You can always buy a last Intel or new APUs from AMD xD. It was a gpu to laptops with integrated card and media engine. For duplicate media engine they did this.
amd encoder on budget rx cards are trash anyways
@@amadeos.a.7929 Even the strongest AMD APU currently, the 5700G is nowhere near the 1050Ti, it's between the 1030 and the 1050, plus it's expensive, you could get a i3-12100 and the RX6400 for cheaper and it's actually better.
@@MaxIronsThird Ryzen 5000g igpus and rx 6400 don't make much difference in the current aaa games as they both going to struggle anyways, at least you save alot of power with the igpus. You need at least a minimum of GTX 1060 6gb.
4 cores like the i3 12100f has been around for over a decade already, aren't the majority of market share anymore and future games and productivity softwares are going to take advantage to the multiple cores like 6 and more cores as technology becomes more ressources hungry now.
@@AznKei1 You have no idea what you're talking about.
The RX6400 is just 15% weaker than the 1060, a new one is cheaper than a used 1060, and uses 3x less energy, while sure the 12100(Alder Lake) is just a quad-core CPU, Alder Lake single core performance is through the roof compared to something like Coffee Lake, and can push upwards off 200FPS in some games, the 12100 is 15% faster than the 8700K(Coffee Lake's flagship), the i3-8700K can't even beat the i3-10100(Comet Lake) is most cases.
4C Comet Lake = 6C Coffee Lake
That's a 50% increase.
Then Alder Lake Single Core performance is 15% faster than Comet Lake.
150 x 1.15 = 172%
Ryzen 2 and Comet Lake are much better than the stuff Intel was recycling every year to consumers, since Broadwell.
Хорошая работа!
Are this one the low profile edition of this GPU?
I'd be interested what they are like with the go to budget CPUs that budget GPU buyers would also be using, such as the i5-10400f
Basically the same, on CPU heavy games like Cyberpunk, Watch Dogs Legion and Hitman 3, you might see 5% lower fps,(10% in PCIe3.0).
The better pick is the i3-12100, it's better than the i5-10400 and has Gen4 PCIe.
I have an I5 6500T(2.8ghz with boost, 4c4t) and an rx 6400 through pcie3 and I get 45-60 on RDR2 at 1080p at 1080p with Ultra Textures, Tree an Fur with the rest set to medium.
I get 60 FPS on GTA 5 at 1080P high on every setting.
My CPU stays between 55-95 usage but mostly at 75ish though. Even with the old 35 watt CPU the GPU is still the bottleneck.
With all that said it's my RV gaming rig that I run off solar and it only uses a 180 watt PSU. Not bad for 1080p 60fps gaming system.
I feel like these low end gpu's should be paired with more realistic specs since let's face it, if your using one of these gpu's then you probably don't have 32gb of DDR5 and a beast of a cpu.
true.
but you can`t realistically compare 2 gpus if there`s bottleneck
@@salvatore8426 true
Would a i5-4690 paired with the rx 6400 be good for playing games like Tekken 6 and DmC?
should be ok
Please include the gpu watt usage in the benchmark. I think everyone would appreciate
1050ti 75w/6400 54w
@@paulretrocomputingroom They are not maxed out when normal gaming even if the GPU is at 100%
@@sergiougazio7976 Can't you just see that they're at 99 to 100% usage at all times?
@@MaxIronsThird I meant that the watt usage is not maxed out at 53w when gaming even if the gpu is at 100%. Only very few games makes the watt usage go to 53w.
It performs well when in PCIe 4.0, but in PCIe 3.0 the performance drop is significant in many cases
-10 fps estaria rindiendo igual que la 1050ti en dado caso tenga menos costo que la 1050ti aun sigue siendo una gran compra
@@erazochavesiancarlo5988 It's not -10fps, it's -10% which still is way better than the 1050Ti, it only starts running similar to the 1050Ti on 2.0, but who's still on Sandy Bridge at this point?
Me
@@FoxyCAMTV A graphics card is not your biggest problem then.
a lot of people still are you'd be suprised @@MaxIronsThird
1050ti is like way cheaper than Rx 6400 in my country like if I take 6400 I have to lower the budget for my monitor mouse etc and if I take 1050ti I can get a decent monitor would I take it or stick with the rx6400 (yes I have pci3) not pcie 4
Its a good card ,low power draw and decent budget FPS.
is rx 6400 tested on pci 4.0 or 3.0 cause in other video are the fps around same with 1050 ti.
We waited 6 years to pay more for less performance
3.0 or 4.0???????????????
6400 still better by quite a margin, just 5 to 10% loss in performance.
RX 6400 with pcie 3.0 vs GTX 1050ti
With i3 10100f
Now that's what I call budget gaming rig
@@orleu_sko I have an i5 2320 and an rx 6400
rx 6400 is better
6400 still better and cheaper.
@@yacquubfarah6038 I have the same CPU i5 2320 and I keep wondering what should I choose between these two because I'm using an pcie 2.0 mobo believing that 1050 TI will do better than rx 6400 because of optimization. Now amigo since you have these specs (i5 2320 and rx 6400) can you please tell me how is the performance? is there any hiccups while gaming or can you give me advice what to choose between those to the 1050 ti or the rx6400 please reply thanks!
6400 seems to be around 50% faster in this system, I wonder if it would be the same with a 12100 which is more realistic!
still the same thing if the cpu doesn't bottleneck the gpu there's no different, if you put i5-9600k it's still would perform the same thing. The different is pcie gen where rx 6400 would perform way more better on pcie gen 4 then gen 3
the 12100 would have no problem getting the same fps its an extremely good processor for the price. and 50% is unrealistic.
@@nothinginteresting1833 10% reduced performance on Gen3.
-10 FPS on average running PCI-E 3.0 (plus no hardware encoding) which most users on this price range are still using 🙄 Keeping that on mind it sits right between 1050Ti and 1650, at $160 MSRP it's a huge rip off 🙅♂
its 6% slower with pcie 3 and in some games the fps is almost identical to pcie 4.0. And it actually trades blows with the 1650 it gets higher fps in some games and in others the 1650 gets higher fps.
The 1650 at a typical $209 is the real rip off now!
5 to 10% slower, not fps.
You know what I am getting bored of see u use the same clips or same place for ever video it's like your are copy pasting please use use some other areas the game is huge place please let us explore some other the game while we watch the benchmark
It's a benchmark though, it's supposed to be the same.
It would be better to but a modern integrated graphics cpu. You get a cpu AND gpu in one. Plus you can upgrade with a physical gpu while still having a decent cpu to paur with it. You're better off getting something like the 5600g. You can't use your rx 6400 gpu without a cpu so it'll still prolly cause as much as a 5600g (or choose one of the many other much cheaper apu's) yet not be upgradeable if you go for the 6400 and similar quality cpu to pair with it.
1050ti 💩💩💩
So if a 1050ti is a low end card ...then what are the gt cards ....high end cards? Not sayin that the 1050ti is a good card ..it is absolute shit but it is much better than the real "low end cards"
1050ti is a low-mid card from 2016. 6400 is a low end card from 2022.
да rx 6400 просто порвала gtx 1050ti как тузик грелку. 😄
ты похоже не туда смотришь, смотри на AVG FPS
2016 low end tecch power released in 2022 what a fucking joke.
on par with the 1650 from 2018 though, and this is a super low end card, the the 6500XT is even better.
on par with the 1650 from 2018 though, and this is a super low end card, the 6500XT is even better, matching the 1650S.
Nvidia will launch the RTX2050 next month for $200, and it will be weaker than the 6500XT.
AMD win !