Yup Trident 2 Pem 1. Launched from USS Tennessee I was the 3" Launcher Operator that day. Did not think much of what happened that day until we saw this video on the TV news that night. It was pretty close. EOD had to clear the deck of the submarine of unburned rocket fuel self destruction that was triggered when it malfunctioned. Glad to be around still to talk about it.
Ну, если бы вы могли наблюдать "это", надо было бы очищать не не только палубу от топлива, но и всё судно от другой субстанции... Собственно, командный мостик потом точно чистили и проветривали...)
Ever shoot oranges out of the 3 inch? I never saw it happen personally, but the older MMs would tell stories about launching oranges at other boats when in port.
1st rule of military armourment : if you leave it locked up unused for long enough, your munitions will spontaneously decide to cut and run when you try and use them
@@leventekocsis9103 you are delusional to think Russia is weak in missile tech --- that is British intelligence narrative hinged on hatred on anything Russian
This was one of the first test launches of Trident II D-5. Miscalculation fired the rocket booster too soon. Missiles are propelled out of the boat by a pressure system because it can't fire rockets inside the boat or underwater. Rockets ignited too early and splashed back seawater that extinguished a rocket nozzle and sent the missile into a tumble. Observation surface vessel hit the self-destruct. The crew of the submarine didn't know of the failure and abort right away.
@@saabsonsan Rated as the 6th largest economy in the world, worked on the Manhattan Project, gave the US their first jet engines, and developed our own nuclear deterrent in 1952.
@@cs7th the sixth largest economy by GDP. There are other markers which don’t paint such a rosey picture. But the government and media would prefer to ignore those. The British developed their nuclear deterrent in the 1950’s with a lot of help from the Americans. In those days however universities and the brightest students received grants to incentivise and enable their work. Now most universities are more concerned about the bottom line to finance work on blue sky research needed for projects such as the manhattan project. The next “big thing” is speculated to be AI which America, china and the EU are throwing money at on a scale the UK simply can’t compete with.
Well, I was a master control engineer and recorded this from 1986-1989 channel 9 KCAU TV news one satellite feed. I am not sure of the actual date! Maybe someone out there can get that info and I will put it with this video!
@@MIL-STD The actuator was broken by water slamming the nozzle. Fixes included beefing up the actiuator and adding a cover plate that would blow out on ignition.
First flight test launch of a Trident D5 at sea 1986. During broach, the massive size of the missile, sucked in water which damaged a nozzle actuator. This video, demonstrates the self destruct of the failed launch. The current computer models of the 80s, couldn’t accurately predict this hydrodynamic issue. Lockheed engineers redesigned the nozzle actuators to withstand the high pressure of water. 4 months later, the Trident successfully flew. And has over 160 successful test launches since, with no failures. Trident is considered to be the most successful deterrent missile system of the US Strategic Triad.
The UGM-133A Trident II, or Trident D5 is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), built by Lockheed Martin Space in Sunnyvale, California, and deployed with the United States and Royal Navy. It was first deployed in March 1990,[6] and remains in service. The Trident II Strategic Weapons System is an improved SLBM with greater accuracy, payload, and range than the earlier Trident C-4. It is a key element of the U.S. strategic nuclear triad and strengthens U.S. strategic deterrence. The Trident II is considered to be a durable sea-based system capable of engaging many targets. It has payload flexibility that can accommodate various treaty requirements, such as New START. The Trident II's increased payload allows nuclear deterrence to be accomplished with fewer submarines,[14] and its high accuracy-approaching that of land-based missiles-enables it to be used as a first strike weapon.[15][16][17]
@@maximilianvascautanu6547 that is the cost for the unit itself. Once you factor in all the supporting hardware and warhead (which this missle can hold 5 ) it totals out in between 79 and 89 million.
Yup Trident 2 Pem 1. Launched from USS Tennessee I was the 3" Launcher Operator that day. Did not think much of what happened that day until we saw this video on the TV news that night. It was pretty close. EOD had to clear the deck of the submarine of unburned rocket fuel self destruction that was triggered when it malfunctioned. Glad to be around still to talk about it.
no
Ну, если бы вы могли наблюдать "это", надо было бы очищать не не только палубу от топлива, но и всё судно от другой субстанции... Собственно, командный мостик потом точно чистили и проветривали...)
Ever shoot oranges out of the 3 inch? I never saw it happen personally, but the older MMs would tell stories about launching oranges at other boats when in port.
is moriseau on your boat?
@@ozvorgI’ve got to hand it to the Russian comrade, that was fucking hilarious 😂
1st rule of military armourment : if you leave it locked up unused for long enough, your munitions will spontaneously decide to cut and run when you try and use them
may they never get used
And people laugh at me when i tell them this is close to how Russia's ICBMs would do when Russia wanted to use them.
@@leventekocsis9103 you are delusional to think Russia is weak in missile tech --- that is British intelligence narrative hinged on hatred on anything Russian
This was one of the first test launches of Trident II D-5. Miscalculation fired the rocket booster too soon. Missiles are propelled out of the boat by a pressure system because it can't fire rockets inside the boat or underwater. Rockets ignited too early and splashed back seawater that extinguished a rocket nozzle and sent the missile into a tumble. Observation surface vessel hit the self-destruct. The crew of the submarine didn't know of the failure and abort right away.
Imagine this had the real Warhead inside. Oh boy. Though I'd like to think there's safety and redundant onboard systems in place for that.
Also it carry multiple warheads so thats mean more fun 😀
there is
If it did go boom it's in the middle of the artic circle anyways
was fritch the weapons officer?
on Real Real tactical missiles there is NO self-destruct mechanism.
Just a few kinks to work out in the countermeasure avoidance system.
missile bought off Temu or Wish?
😂 Damn ,Some submariner played the Ringa Ringa Roses Rhyme.
Britain needs to design and build it's own deterrent.
It’s too poor for that
@@saabsonsan Rated as the 6th largest economy in the world, worked on the Manhattan Project, gave the US their first jet engines, and developed our own nuclear deterrent in 1952.
@@cs7th the sixth largest economy by GDP. There are other markers which don’t paint such a rosey picture. But the government and media would prefer to ignore those. The British developed their nuclear deterrent in the 1950’s with a lot of help from the Americans. In those days however universities and the brightest students received grants to incentivise and enable their work. Now most universities are more concerned about the bottom line to finance work on blue sky research needed for projects such as the manhattan project. The next “big thing” is speculated to be AI which America, china and the EU are throwing money at on a scale the UK simply can’t compete with.
This is a Trident II D5, not a Polaris
Thank you!
came here because of the military channel Armed Stories, by the way when did the missile fail to launch?
Well, I was a master control engineer and recorded this from 1986-1989 channel 9 KCAU TV news one satellite feed. I am not sure of the actual date! Maybe someone out there can get that info and I will put it with this video!
did they ever figureout what went wrong? my guess is that someone didnt connect the command sequecherproperly
were youan mt also?
Nice firecracker!
Nice to see the rotation
It was like a diwali crackers
Это было похоже на китайский фейерверк.
12-13-1986? Not 1989?
The pirats expected it to be a great spectacle to scare the russians.
It turned to be some sort of Mr Bean comedy instead.
That looked expensive! Jammed thrust actuator?
the thing made to explode exploded.
How embarrassing. 😮
There no warhead in there is safe
Clogged nozzle was the culprit
Do you have a source? Looks like the nozzle was working just fine.. looks like a gimbal issue to me.
@@MIL-STD The actuator was broken by water slamming the nozzle. Fixes included beefing up the actiuator and adding a cover plate that would blow out on ignition.
whats the back story behind this?
Looks to me as if the engine was started too late and the missile had rotated into one direction too much as to still be recoverable
Still Classified!
@@LeBoomStudios rotating & starting too late doesn't make motor explode. So, you're wrong.
@@Will-ql5db they self destruct if they’d go out of control
First flight test launch of a Trident D5 at sea 1986. During broach, the massive size of the missile, sucked in water which damaged a nozzle actuator. This video, demonstrates the self destruct of the failed launch. The current computer models of the 80s, couldn’t accurately predict this hydrodynamic issue. Lockheed engineers redesigned the nozzle actuators to withstand the high pressure of water. 4 months later, the Trident successfully flew. And has over 160 successful test launches since, with no failures. Trident is considered to be the most successful deterrent missile system of the US Strategic Triad.
VHS ?
Yes late 80’s
Who designed the Trident?
The UGM-133A Trident II, or Trident D5 is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), built by Lockheed Martin Space in Sunnyvale, California, and deployed with the United States and Royal Navy. It was first deployed in March 1990,[6] and remains in service. The Trident II Strategic Weapons System is an improved SLBM with greater accuracy, payload, and range than the earlier Trident C-4. It is a key element of the U.S. strategic nuclear triad and strengthens U.S. strategic deterrence. The Trident II is considered to be a durable sea-based system capable of engaging many targets. It has payload flexibility that can accommodate various treaty requirements, such as New START. The Trident II's increased payload allows nuclear deterrence to be accomplished with fewer submarines,[14] and its high accuracy-approaching that of land-based missiles-enables it to be used as a first strike weapon.[15][16][17]
Remember remember the 5th of November
Ah yeah, happens to me all the time
That's how we celbrated the 4th on the sub
The US test missiles are blue in color arent they !?
was that Chinese missile? 😅
哈哈😂
What a dumb joke. China is stronger than the UK.
the infamous "Hypno-Missile"
WOW😍😍
former mt uss michigan
- 7.000.000$
-79,000,000 us dollar
@@jhovanygonzalez4155 I was wrong but you too it's 29.000.000$
@@maximilianvascautanu6547 that is the cost for the unit itself. Once you factor in all the supporting hardware and warhead (which this missle can hold 5 ) it totals out in between 79 and 89 million.
Ja, ja,ja. Que Risa!. Menudo desastre!!
😂😂😂😂😂
The British should use semiconductors from washing machines like the Russians and there will be no such problems
Russias fail all the time when tested. The sarmat 2 has had 1 successful launch out of 5. The latest test blew a massive crater In the launch site. 🤣
🤣😅😂👌
Darrrrrhhhhh
Sonic FX
I thought only russia fails
Маску понравилось
must have frecksquadeon17 weapons officerfritch out
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Los ingleses deberían contratar técnicos chinos para que les enseñen a hacer este tipo de cosas que se les quedan demasiado grandes.