Russia's Avdiivka Disaster - Invasion of Ukraine During the Gaza Crisis
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 жов 2023
- In this comprehensive video update, we delve into the latest developments in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As the autumn transitions into winter, the Ukrainian military faces new challenges, and their efforts to counter Russian advances are under scrutiny.
The video explores the strategic dynamics of this conflict, detailing how both Ukrainian and Russian military forces have adapted to the changing conditions. We examine the Ukrainian counteroffensive operations and the formidable obstacles they encounter in the Zaporizhia oblast. Despite their determination, achieving a decisive breakthrough remains elusive, as they grapple with Russian minefields and well-fortified defensive positions.
The narration highlights the various fronts in this war, from the Dnipro River to North Luhansk and Donbas. It discusses the intense battles and counterattacks taking place, shedding light on the successes and setbacks faced by both sides. Notably, we analyze a major Russian offensive in the Avdiivka section and the subsequent Ukrainian response, which inflicted significant losses on the Russian army.
The video also delves into the critical aspect of international support for both Ukraine and Russia. We assess the contributions of several countries, especially Western allies, in terms of military aid and assistance, emphasizing the focus on bolstering Ukraine's air defense capabilities for the upcoming winter.
Furthermore, the video touches on the complexities of international diplomacy, including the impact of the conflict between Israel and Hamas on the allocation of resources and aid to Ukraine. We discuss the concerns and challenges regarding the continuation of military support for Ukraine, particularly in the face of changing priorities in Washington.
Lastly, the video provides an insightful breakdown of the visually confirmed losses of equipment suffered by both sides, as reported by the Oryx blog, offering a quantitative perspective on the conflict's toll.
Join us as we analyze the ongoing Ukraine conflict, providing you with a well-rounded understanding of the current situation, the strategic intricacies, and the international factors at play. Stay informed and up-to-date on this pressing global issue.
🎥 Join our UA-cam members and patrons to unlock exclusive content! Our community is currently enjoying deep dives into the First Punic War, Pacific War, history of Prussia, Italian Unification Wars, Russo-Japanese War, Albigensian Crusade, and Xenophon’s Anabasis. Become a part of this exclusive circle: / @kingsandgenerals or patron: / kingsandgenerals and Paypal paypal.me/kingsangenerals as well!
Pacific War Series: • How Europe Colonized A...
Modern Warfare series: • Modern Warfare
Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals or by joining the youtube membership: / @kingsandgenerals
Video: Leif Sick
Script: Turgut Gambar
Narration: Officially Devin
✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/kingsand...
✔ Podcast ► www.kingsandgenerals.net/podcast/
✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Instagram ► / kings_generals
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.comConclusion
#Documentary #Crimea #Ukraine #UkraineConflict #RussiaUkraine #GlobalCrisis
🎥 Join our UA-cam members and patrons to unlock exclusive content! Our community is currently enjoying deep dives into the First Punic War, Pacific War, history of Prussia, Italian Unification Wars, Russo-Japanese War, Albigensian Crusade, and Xenophon’s Anabasis. Become a part of this exclusive circle: ua-cam.com/channels/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fw.htmljoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal paypal.me/kingsangenerals as well!
What is the percentage of losses, to what they have total. roughly
Can you make a different way to earn this. May be like getting 10 people to sub
No , putin WANTED to join Nato on 2000 , and up to 2014 Russia cooperate with NATO . The invasion of Crimea by putin stopped this coopération. This is a fact
As someone who is Bosnian, European white and Muslim who survived the aggression against the state, genocide in Srebrenica alone. I feel sorry for all the innocent people and I feel sorry for anyone who dies for politics.
For now, I am on Russia's side because it is on the side of Palestine and on the Muslim side while Zelensky supports the killing of Muslims. Ukrainians came to Bosnia to kill Muslim Serbs, as did Greeks and some Russians. So because of Zelensky and things like that, I don't support Ukraine. Then the West does not want to say and admit that there is a Nazi party and a Nazi battalion of AZOV in Ukraine.
If we have the rough number of losses for Russian forces, shouldn’t we also have it for Ukrainian forces?
Seems like every modern war without either side having air superiority will end in a stalemate...
That's where the delayed effect of US fighter jets will come into play. Pilots need to be trained on them which will take time, but when the F-16s enter the skies, they should tip the scales in favor of Ukraine in terms of air superiority. Ukraine first and foremost needs to hold out until then. The war's not won just because of shiny new old planes, war ebbs and flows and Russia can always find a way to turn it around, but if they're in a stalemate now, what will better equipment do for Ukraine when it finally starts getting deployed?
@@raetekusu1 Disagreed Non-stealth planes like F-16 will not be able to breach the anti-air cover both sides have
Basically yeah
Without overwhwlming number advantage, navy assistance or air superiority it becomes a war of attrition
Ww1 is what modern war of evenly matched sides becomes without aircraft
Having air superiority implies also having ground superiority, because if the ground is contested then anyone with a heat-seeking rocket launcher can take out an aircraft.
Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq?
source for losses please
at 10:40 Kirby's comments were taken slightly out of context. The context was concerning aid that was already in the pipeline from previous aid packages. It was not referring to any future aid packages. Also it should be noted that some of the previous aid packages are spread out over time into the future so there is still a lot in the pipeline.
Thank you for the clarification, much appreciated.
Very much appreciated. Thanks! Apparently this channel wants to 'chisel reality' so it fits into a certain desired 'shape'...🤔
@@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 idk This was a really easy one to take out of context and i think it was actually reported that way over some regular media. So this was a very easy one to get wrong i don't think there's anything more to it than that.
@@jasongeringer OK. Fair enough.
It should also be worth mentioning, the republicans tried for 5 months to get a budget passed with Ukraine aid included and the democrats unanimously voted against it each time, it wasn't until the republicans removed the aid as a line item that the democrats voted for it, and then promptly voted to remove the speaker, which has completely stalled all budget and aid talks.
So while yes some of the republicans favor isolationist policies it was the democrats that held up aid and then made it impossible to continue talks to get a budget and more aid flowing while blaming it on the republicans. Classic democrat behavior blame the other side for the problems you created.
Thanks for continuing to report on this conflict @KingsandGenerals while the rest of the media has moved on to Israel and Hamas.
your production quality/analysis is hands down some of the best on the internet.
Wow right off the bat you report both fronts! I have a lot of respect for you thank you for your reporting 😊
Love this channel. You’re knocking it out of the park with the thorough analyses
If only it is true the odd to secure a victory in a war to a defending enemy is 3 or 5 to 1. But if you notice at the end the loss of Ukraine doesn't add up after with all 300+ billion dollar equipment donations. The are still demanding & getting more.
My uncle and cousin are fighting in nui York, I hate no one speaks on this place, been fighting there 13months now, the go pro they send home footage is sad and scary
This isn't a war between Russia and Ukraine, this is a war between Christianity and Judaism. Both Ukraine and Russia is run by zionist Jews who want to exterminate Christians.
There is a tiny New York, Ukraine in Donetsk Oblast
@@austinrose105 ya, it's been very active fighting since last year when August offensive happened, my uncle & cousin send us there Go pro footage every few months, nui York is a bloodbath, there's many towns & villages under siege but Ukraine is holding, sadder situation is Ukraine men are leaving, there tired of the war, overall sad situation rate now
@@harishadzibulic6603 ya theres few video on rumble & UA-cam on Nui York battle, idk why there isn't more discussion on it, Ukraine mountains brigades then the 18th air assault brigade fighting there,
@@austinrose105 Nui York not new York but pronounced the same, and I'll be uploading footage tomorrow, uncle Dimitri gave permission
I don’t know how I’m just finding out about this channel. I follow so many similar channels and never saw this one recommended. It only took the first 30 seconds to see it’s a good quality channel.
Adivvka is a City not a small town like robotyne or verbove
@@babisvdhoofd8011 You're a minor detail.
@@babisvdhoofd8011it’s not….
@@babisvdhoofd8011the Russians biggest losses in a single day of the war was the assault on adiivka. And they had those immense losses 3 times in a row. Without taking the city nor stopping Ukraine's offensives.
It had 31.000 inhabitants before the war. Not a villige, but not a city either. By Ukrainian standards it is just a town. With no strategic significance. Without using much resources the Ukrainians have inflicted the largest casualties of the war upon the Russians in terms of both vehicles and manpower. Dwarfing the vuhledar offensive.
@@DanishCamp You probably should widen your sources and not repeat propaganda without reflection.
Do you guys plan to make a video about Turkish war of independence, there is 3 days it to become 100th year
Down the line!
@@KingsandGenerals🤠
Its actually 3 days but oppsie
WWI style stagnant trench warfare seems set to stay in modern warfare.
As long as the air is completely saturated with drones. The drones take away the "surprise" when amassing bigger numbers for an offensive. If either side changes that, they'll be at an advantage.
Until drone countermeasures start becoming more prevalent then yes
Iran Iraq War had a very simlar war minus the drones.
Algorithm
I think it has more to do with the fact that armored vehicles like tanks are now just used as mobile artillery to support the front from some distance, truth it's that all modern armored vehicles are incredibly vulnerable, they can be killed by almost everything on the battlefield, from drones to portable rockets to mines to planes to helicopters to even precision artillery, so rapid movements like on WW2 are just suicide, the Russians are learning this the hard way, but also when the sword becomes too sharp and the shield does not cover you, trenches are the results
So glad that patrons get the to be the sponsors now. Feels much better. Ty for this analysis
Why does it seem like Russia is always at a disadvantage in K&G comparisons?
Cause K&G is not neutral. Same with the title, it is not a disaster, as of now, the Russians are actually succeeding in taking that trash heap.
Because they are. They practically never see any victories in offensive movements, except for the few weeks before outside aid started to reach Ukrainian military. Even then it took them how long to take mariopal, which was completely isolated for weeks. They've also lost numerous ships to a country with no navy, and resorted in weaponizing energy resources.
Now they're selling Oil (their largest economic export) at record low prices. Doesn't really scream "advantageous" to me
@@ts5924I like how it went from "Kiev in three days" to "Yes! We took the northern part of the trash heap North of Avdiivka in only 9 years!"
Also, K&G clearly DID show Russia advancing towards that trash heap.
But the losses Russia suffered in that attack are absolutely insane in comparison to that territorial gain.
@@kurteisner67 I'm neutral in this conflict so I'm not saying that.
And the territorial gain Russia had this year is more than Ukraine during the counter offensive. Do you have numbers on casualties? Don't speak if you don't know.
The trash heap is not a disaster but a win, having the hights and no more bombing donestk . Twisting it otherwise is spewing propaganda.
@@ts5924 "[...] I'm not saying that."
Fair enough. I also didn't mean to imply you did, sorry if it came off this way. I rather wanted to mock Russian ultranationalist talking points.
"having the hights [sic!] and no longer bombing Donetsk"
Neither is true though? Ukraine's still in Avdiivka, supply is still getting there, the Russian plan to encircle hasn't worked (at least, so far). Neither has the plan to cut them off from re-supplying.
I mean, I don't disagree that the ground gained by the Russian Forces on the trash heap is a small tactical and strategic win from a territorial perspective, but was it really worth the massive losses?
"Do you have numbers on casualties?"
Do you mean manpower or equipment? The equipment part is explained in this very video.
Particularly Oryx has been proven to be very reliable in these matters as a baseline, since they visually verify virtually every piece of equipment lost before reporting on that (which of course leads to underreporting, but bulletproof evidence for the _lowest_ reasonable numbers).
As for manpower, there's literally no way to know, not for me, not for anyone. I don't claim to either. We could of course make some educated guesses,.but that's about it.
Thank you for your coverage of these wars.
I wish your information on this conflict wasn’t so heavily biased. It’s a shame because your channel covers so many other conflicts so well. Pretty sure you could’ve titled this “Ukraines Disaster”, as again they’re losing quite a bit more men than the Russians in this battle.
Is that why you still haven't gained ground in months? Against 'old men, children and women'.
I completely agree. Reporting is lopsided. Barely any coverage of Russian gains or Ukraine asset losses. They're very unbiased about wars of the past (especially the further back we go), but as far as this present conflict, I can't help but feel slightly propoganized.
Any ideas on where we can find something less biased, or at the very least, told from the Eastern or Russian perspectives that break it down something close to this?
Well this is a Pro Ukraine channel so be not surprised.
great summary guys, as alwas - thanks
Any way Russia has captured the terracon , which gives her more visual , now they have to capture the factory or berdyachi
They were repulsed...
@@Kobrag90 no they still in the terracon now they have to attack the chemical factory or hit berdyachi , terracon is the waste site which is could be considered as a mini mountain which gives you full vision to all parts of avidivka the factory is next to the terracon , the russians were repealed in the factory but they still owe the terracon
Got to laugh, from "Demilitarizing Ukraine" to "Yayy, we took a slag pit" and "Now we're going to take a factory" in about 18 months. Fucking russian clowns.
What a fucking tragedy.
Lol😂
For who? Oh yeah Ukrainians. 🤮
Looks like, as long as the drones are in place, it's going to stay a stalemate. Thanks for making this great video!
@@Stockfish1511This is what I am hearing from other sources too. Just listeng to the tone in this youtubers voice and some of the language used. Like labeling Republicans who want to stop giving Ukraine a blank cheque, has made start to seriously doubt the neutrality or accuracy of this channel. Maybe he should stick to the historical stuff.
They've never pretended to be neutral. At the very start they said "Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine"
@@Stockfish1511”A lot” 2 kilometres at best with 80+ heavy military machinery lost. (Yes I did check the distance). And it’s only if we’re talking since October 21st. Cuz for the past 2 days it was about 100 meters. Btw, are you sure that it’s Russia who’s dominating over the FVP sector? Cuz when I checked it, it was 3 times lower than Ukrainian.
@@Stockfish1511
@@rightwoke
As always a very good video! Thanks for your continued production of well crafted videos.
Any updates on personal losses?
Thanks for the video & update
Do you guys planning to make a video about Karabakh Wars, Osetian War and Abkhazian War?
Finally! A video which goes into detail on the current situation in Ukraine. Also covers many other aspects of this conflict.
check out the military summary UA-cam channel. A couple of detailed videos each day. However, be prepared to hear many different things from this channel. MS does have a lot of geo locations and videos and seems more in line with the concerns we are recently hearing about.
Thank you!@@tommatty
It’s sounding like Zelenskyy help you 🤣 get your information right to start with! And go and take a nap with Biden ! Ukrainians have no more marracons left !
Thanks for continuing making these videos
That Kirby quite is significantly out of context. He is referring to that the current approved support for Ukraine is running out, not that support in general is.
ua-cam.com/users/livepwaVIYDDLZc?si=jv5l1Wcn4BtR9Hga
It begins at 41:10
still. if a republican wins in 2024 support for Ukraine by the US might dwindle massively.
This world is a mess :(
It has always been a mess. It's just more obvious in the era of information.
Khazars gonna Khazar.
Usa global police no good
@@shamilabdullah9996I agree, the invasion of Ukraine was a pretty stupid move by the Russians
The war is no more a mess than it used to be, we’re just bombarded with information every second and every opinion. Now we can receive live updates of death counts so it seems worse than the past, but i can assure you any one who studies histories is quite aware that if you go back long enough, the death counts just get bigger and bigger
Will be a big surprise if Avdiivka will not become "Bakhmut part two"
Avdiivka is high ground with one side (eastern) being easily defensible. It is by no means like Severodonetsk (flat land) or Bakhmut (bowl surrounded by hills).
Does anyone know how they make those Unit Cards..? Or what they're called..?
What we need to remember is that the Ukrainian army does not have the luxury of combined arms assault as they lack sufficient aircraft to combine with artillery and armor to achieve their breakthrough offensive we have hoped. Our own experience against a sovereign state was Iraqi Freedom in 2003 and the Iraqi military had poor equipment and morale. The Ukrainians have good morale and motivation, and understand the importance of preserving their tanks and armored vehicles from the minefields the Russians laid out. Reports suggest the Ukrainian infantry have made progress in the second line of Russian defense, and commando raids in Crimea and Russian naval targets shows they are creative. The arrival of fighter jets should help in the air war against Russia, and provide close air support for the infantry. This need for air support is the reason that cluster munitions are being used.
The reason for using cluster munitions is that the west simply cannot produce enough ordinary shells, hence the US having to retrieve some of it's strategic stockpiles in Israel to send it to Ukraine. Contrary to western doctrine Russia outproduces the west by 7-1 in artillery shells. (source: Business Insider, September 2023). Another field where the Russians trump the west is that of missile technology and Air-defence and that too is due to military doctrine, that's why Russia (and the Soviets) who could not match NATOs navy and airforce instead opted for submarines, anti-ship and anti-air missiles.
A rock-paper-scissors situation.
IMO Ukraine did the right thing to switch to smaller infantry unit tactics - a tactic the Russians haven't trained for decades to counter.
.
Will it be enough? I doubt it, but we'll see. But no-one can take away the Ukrainians bravery and creativity on the battlefield
@@BalloonInTheBalloon if they receive the fighter jets and additional helicopters for close air support it should make it easier to advance. If they are saving the tanks for the areas after the final defensive line and the Russians lack a strategic reserve, then the advance should be much better.
It greatly depends what the Ukrainians get to go along with their f-16's as well,in the terms of weapons. There's a large amount of air-launched weapons that could be supplied,and we have very little idea what the U.S is willing to give.
@@swordsmith2576that’s as if Russia doesn’t have the best air defense system 😅
I agree, we know that as soon as Ukraine or Russia gets their airforce into combat, tides of the war will change. Air Dominance will be the decider.
thank you for your continued coverage
WESTCENTRIC reporter
Thank you for your continued coverage of this war. Hopefully it will end soon.
God be with you out there everybody. ✝️
I like hearing an unbiased opinion even if you are pro Ukrainian
I feel like Ukraine made the mistake of focusing the assault on the place EVERYONE thought they were going to attack. No one was surprised were it was to take place so they lost any element of surprise they may have had. Coupled with the fact that Russia has had plenty of time to dig in, and the west late delivery of armored vehicles/tanks, counter offensive was doomed to stall.
It was obvious for a reason though. It was the only front where even a partial success would have resulted in meaningful strategic gains by pressuring some of the most vital Russian supply lines. Putting some blue paint on the map up north would have been satisfying, but it wouldn't have changed the overall situation much. If anything it would just have made the northern front more difficult to supply in the long run by bulging it deep into Russian held territory. Through somewhat rugged terrain no less!
I don't have any great insights, but these videos have continued to be fantastic.
Would you also do videos about the Russo-Chechen-Wars ?
Hi Irishman. The story of our difficult relationship and wars with Russia very similar to story between Ireland and Britain
this is the best war coverage of any channel. It contains straight-to-the-point information not a bunch of reporters opinions.
Yes!! So many other channels have already picked the winner even though they disagree on which side it will be.
Thanks for the update.
Good video, but whatever happened to covering one entire month of the war at a time?
Nothing happened. Heavy battles are now taking place at the front. And at this time Ukraine is preparing for winter. As they said in the Game of Thrones series, "Winter is near". Now there is a war of attrition when one country is exhausted and a turning point will begin
thank you
Regarding the end of the video and the losses...how do we know those numbers are true? Both sides like to skew those numbers
These are visually confirmed losses
@@KingsandGenerals confirmed where?
@@excentrik5725 Oryx blog
Sounds like a stalemate going into winter.
thanks for the information on Kirby warning that Ukraine aid may be about to lapse, very disturbing news
Kirby was speaking in the context of what has been previously authorized by Congress at the time of the 45-day budget deal. Any further aid is contingent on a new budget including it passing Congress -- the statement was not referencing overall US interest in continued support of Ukraine.
Good, other countries need to focus on their own problems (*cough*USA*cough*) instead of funding pointless wars
@@dannyearlreal If only Russia focused on their own problems instead of starting pointless wars.
Yeah people made that excuse too when another Dictator was going around Europe in the '30s invading its neighbors....@@dannyearlreal
@@dannyearlrealand when those pointless wars *are* the country’s problem?
16:42 there is a city/town/village called. Bye York, top right along the front first visible at 16:15
@KingandGenerals it would be interesting to add if possible, the resources available and the level of replenishment of each side, apart from knowing the up-to-date military personnel and equipment loss
I don't think it is possible
@@KingsandGenerals is understandable since that data is surely classified as war wages.
Thank u. Stay safe 👊
Would u made putting up ukraine losses aswell because it just seems like I'm not getting tye hole picture
About 2.8k official KIA's last week especially in Avdiivka and Robotyne and verbove total casualties unknown and a good amount if vehicles but again numbers unknown...
@henkschrader4513 dammm thank you though there would be more on vehicle losses but thank you and probably say it about the same or just about double amount of cas on the russian side
Sadly vast part of these aid pledges are just words... would be much better to see the REAL aid provided by each country, not their empty pledges :(
if a drone is designed to ram into something and blow up is that considered a loss when it does that, or only a loss if destroyed before it can do that?
Those drones are not counted, I think. The list has only the Bayraktar type drones which have their own weapons or heavy recon drones like Russian Orion.
I'm not 100%, but I think the drone losses are like reaper drones, or maybe even the smaller quadcopters they use to scout and drop nades on one another, not the suicide drones that are essentially controllable bombs.
Obsolete Hawks SAM systems from the 60's, soviet IFVs (BMP1?) and the same F16 we saw 40 years ago🤣🤣🤣
Those numbers at the end show the rather astounding scale of the Russo-Ukrainian War. To that count of expended military equipment, one could also add the tremendous cost and scale of the fixed defenses (Maginot-esque) that have been constructed. Construction that is, in the main, not readily re-deployable.
you're right. however, the figures of total losses given at the end do not hold out any criticism and are extremely implausible. I'm afraid, in this case, wishful thinking is given out as valid. Although the rest of the material is more or less objective
@@Skelterer What is your evidence that the numbers are implausible? Their evidence is the visually confirmed ORYX (spelling?) database. As in, they have pictures of every destroyed item with those pictures being verified by some outside group.
@@InvaderNatDT absolutely agree
I love the voice! It is like watching old documentaries!
Will you be covering the war between Israel & Hamas?
So it's extreme Right to question tax payer dollars being spent funding somebody else's war?
That is not what is said in the video.
To put it in perspective, losing 15 MBT's is losing a whole battalion of tanks, 4 tanks per platoon, 3-4 platoons per battalion
That's nothing for Russia their high production rate and massive storage allows them to refurbish and build new regiment a month easy hence why countiue support for Ukraine is important they can't afford these level of loses in short term biggest Russian advantage is numbers of human and equipment
15 is a company
@@gzrh1continued support is important, but Russia absolutely cannot replace the losses of equipment. A nation with a large reserve of equipment doesn't call up 70 year old tanks, and sanctions make getting the computerized parts for modern vehicles much more difficult and costly. I'm not under the delusion that Russia's simply going to hit a hard limit of tanks, shells, helicopters, etc, but losing 2000+ tanks in 2 years of fighting isn't anywhere close to sustainable for Russia. And judging by their current tactics that loss rate doesn't seem to be going anywhere in the near future.
@@gzrh1 "high production rate" cope harder
Well, kind of. Russia uses 3 tanks per platoon.
Can you make a video about the results of the Ukrainian "offensive".
No, he can't, cause there is no result.
Just about to sleep when I found this. Can this channel cover myanmar?
Kinda interesting that the UAF has not actually made landings across the Dniper in the South.
Great summary as usual with very easy to understand infographics. Thanks!
Amazing coverage!
How many lives have been lost on both sides?
LOL the Map showed Morocco labeled as Algeria
I ove how detailed this analysis is, great stuff!
GENIAL video....saludos desde HOnduras
Definitely the best analysis I’ve come across - whether in written form or video form
I understand why Ukraine decided to not focus their armor. But at this point in the offensive season you would think they would try again considering how they’ve fought past two defensive lines now
There are still massive amounts of anti tank and anti personnel mines on the Russian lines....they would just have a repeat of their first attempt
The counter offensive is over my friend the summer has passed and now the Russians are starting their counter offensive the time to focus armor has passed people seem to forget the soviets defended those same lands against Nazis and their armor you don’t think they know how to fight a defensive battle in that region?
@@KingKing-cz6xh Russia is clearly not the Soviets. The Soviets would have won in those imagined three days. Russia isn't even close after 600 days.
Dude....that was what 80 years ago?@@KingKing-cz6xh
@@KingKing-cz6xh Unlike the Russians, the Ukrainians don't want to waste men and equipment by running into minefields over and over.
The Russians have lost at least 109 vehicles this week near adiivka. These have been. Confirmed by satellite, and drone footage. Suchomimus shows the geolocated photos
Can you show us satellite and drone footage?
Bless Your Perfection Praise the true creators 🙌 ❤
I like your narration...
Can u make malay sultanate history?
But isn't it too early to call Avdiivka a "Russian disaster"? If I understand correctly they are still fighting while i am writing and, even if it is true that the Russian troops are taking heavy losses, the Russian leadership doesn't care much: they have plenty of soldiers, and they are not afraid of losing many of them in order to gain a result...
It's still a disaster considering how much equipment and men they waste to gain at least small territory gains.
@@stevolenzingthat’s literally the Russian game plan in any war going on a couple hundred years now
@@KingKing-cz6xh the thing is, Modern Russia cannot sustain this losses, they are no longer the behemoth of the Soviet Union. If they keep losing men like this with no progress at all, a huge population crisis will begin inside of Russia since even before the war Russia's male population was at the lowest in all its history.
@@josecarlosgonzalezgaitan3738yes but when you already have a huge population in comparison with Ukraine it doesn’t matter the Russian army can still afford to loose millions of men unlike Ukraine. All you keep hearing is how Russia doesn’t care about their men exactly they don’t because they have much deeper barrel then Ukraine. It’s literally a military strategy when you have more men then the enemy you throw as many men as you have too to kill theirs because you can replenish them faster then the enemy
The thing is while this channel did their best to stay neutral, in the first episode the channel pledge its allegiance to Ukraine. So the news will feel biased towards Ukraine, even though Russian are indeed back at the offensive and Ukraine are indeed back on the defense. I'm not support Ukraine or the other, I only want to know the news from the front, but the thing is this is one of the best channel for covering the Ukrainian war, even with some words clearly twisted to support to other. So take some words with a little bit of salt, including Ukraine gain, Russian failure, and when he said 'according to some Russian blogger' is more like people who comment on the Facebook or something that mention some narrative that they support. But I'm not against this channel or anybody (please don't burn me for this) its just what I learn when watching this type of news, is that it will try to be biased towards some group and that's ok. People that making this channel are humans too. Again I'm not supporting the war, I don't take sides I just want to know what happen in the front.
Epic arm chair general intro
A fight....instead of a war. Why war? Why worry? Why worry? Fight
Im all for helping Israel but do they REALLY need military aid? Like they outnumber and outgun their oponnents by quite a wide margin. Keep the focus on Ukraine.
I think they are just saying if the war expands. Like if Lebanon and Iran get involved then we’d maybe need to help
How will the Polish election influence the aid to Ukraine?
Probably improve it, slightly
so if not for this noone would even know whats going on in Ukraine…Weird how western media stopped talking about it.
I wonder if Ukraine establishes a good foothold in the west south of the Dnipro, it might force Russia to pull back some troops from the east to refortify, weakening their line in the east - allow Ukraine to make a breakthrough.
I feel like Ukraine needs more help than Israel… ??
Beside returning missile that Israel loan to US, US basically sent nothing to Israel.
@@dvgsun Ukraine can't lost, because it would be a lost of the West
@@oleksandrb4178the west feels like it’s falling, and I’m not a pessimistic person
@@dvgsun don't think so but I don't think they are truly winning either
@@dvgsun If the West doesn't care, then all the worse for it
Ukraine is bound to loose this war.
Love you videos
You cannot convince me that somewhere over there there is a Russian dude is sweating profusely sitting in some rubble bombed out basement or half collapsed trench just scribbling with all his might trying to write all this down
Don’t have to convince you of anything since you don’t have the capacity to understand basic technology
Imagine thinking that the United States isn't the world police being a far right position.
Wouldn't be the first time in U.S. history.
Yeah i noticed that.he didn’t even say far right, it is the “extreme far right”. Sounds like the way soneone who is leftarded speaks.
@@shanekennedy5420 He didn't say it was an extreme far right position though, just that the politicians pushing to end aid are on the extreme right of the elected officials in America, which is objectively true.
@@TfJedisuper if you twist his, the writer of this video, twist his meaning hard enough and then assume the gaetz group are relatively speaking the farthest right in the GOP and therefore by definition extreme then we can pretend you have a point. we can pretend don’t see what is obvious.
He, the writer, is using the phrase extreme right as an insult and in the same propaganda type way the media does. It’s only ever used as a perforative to paint someone as negative without having to defend why. This is standard tactic of the letarded nowadays. They throw labels instead of arguments.
I don’t know if you are sincere or not with this comment TfJedisuper, but this is not first or last leftarded take in otherwise he’ll made comment. I would put forward only the “extreme far left” even use this phrase, so it says more about the writer than it doesn’t about the congressmen. Matt Gaetz doesn’t self identify as extreme right, it’s bullshit smear merchant nonsense from
Top to bottom.
@@shanekennedy5420 I see your point, but I would say it’s fair that the trump wing of the party is broadly the furthest right on most issues - if you feel that’s good or bad is irrelevant - so to brand them as the far right of the party is accurate, but to go into detail about why that is utterly irrelevant to the content of the video. That same wing is also the most vocal about ending aid to Ukraine, so I don’t see this as some wild smear job or distortion of facts and certainly nothing so egregious as to call it propaganda
.
Extreme certainly adds a negative connotation, but IMO it’s at best a jab from the video’s creator and/or writer who has made no secret of their general support for Ukraine in this conflict, or quite possibly a broad but still basically accurate summary of the situation from a non-American who isn’t clued in or overly interested in the minutia of our political landscape.
Litteraly forgot this war is still on
And yet......here you are posting comments!....-hmmm? 😅😂
your brain has to be very small to forgot the only relevant geopolitical event of the current decade lmao
@@tobiaslundqvist.71 yes cause the vid reminded me
Again an amazing Video. From history until today, Everything about empires and military, perfect channel for me!
wait why do they already get aim 9s what plaanes do they have that have that missile
Too bad that there was no mention of Kozachi Laheri, Urojaine and Sakko Vanzetti
Pretty good analysis…
Interesting.
A bit random but can we do a remaster of napoleonic war and ending
Thinking about it
Sooooo much money
Here to read the massive cope from vatniks
Wonder how long this war of attrition is going to last ... probably another 2 years
The war could last another two years, but maybe Zelensky cannot.
Good pronunciation of the Slavic city names.
Why you dont have the courage to Say that Ukraine offensive has a disaster ? Mouths pass and nothing happened
In fact all the small gains with a high price are now being undone and Avdiivka is now in operational encirclement with russia having firecontrol everywhere in every direction bc they comtrol the heights around the "fortress" city and are also making gains their everyday with it bring closer and closer to official encirclement with nowhere to go for the soldiers and the russians are at the same time also slowly chipping away at the city in the south wich means while the noose is tightening for ukraine russia is also putting pressure on it
@@henkschrader4513 People need to start to understand that This war is Over.The offensive was a failure. The tanks, the super bombs, all propoganda , tons os bilions and Ukraine only recover some villages. You all joked about Bakmhut that the russians needed 6 mouths to conquer a single city , Ukraine on 8 conquer nothing. We need to stop sending money and start talking! Or we all gona be bankrup by supporting This war and in the end the russians Will not loose a single city !
@@henkschrader4513 because russia is doing that at the cost away to high
@@raro344 not really if you compare it to their population hell covid killed a lot more in russia
the West giving in to "war fatigue" seems unthinkable. As long as ukrainians are willing and able to resist, Western support will be forthcoming.
Unfortunately the amount of aid provided sofar has barely been enough to give Ukraine a slight advantage, but not sufficient to decisively turn the tables on the battlefield.
SENT tons of aid. Just keeps disappearing somehow. No idea how thos can happen as according to some channels, like this one, Ukraine losses have been so light. There has appeared, in Canada, lots of fighting age Ukrainian male refugees. Don't know how that happened, but the few I've spoken with have no desire to go back and rebuild.
The Ukrainian women who have come are finding Canadian men and arranging to stay. Canada has announced special fast track to citizenship for them and all I know are taking advantage of that. I have to wonder what they are fighting for as everyone I meet doesn't want to return and looks forward to a new life in the west.
So yeah. I'm wondering why send all this aid when the refugees I have met don't seem to care much.
Honestly, the only actual 'war fatigue' is coming from right-wing pieces of shit intentionally undermining the long-term national interests of the country both domestic and foreign. These same undermining elements keep spewing lies and misinformation about the entire situation, including what our foreign aid actually 'costs' us.
Bullshit
More and more voices against sending more help in USA, UK, even Germany. Slovakia announced it stopped sending help, as well as Hungary and Poland, and they'll stop sooner rather than later. No, there is absolutely no certainty that the West will keep sending enough help to Ukraine. It's not about the will to fight, but the West also weights if Ukraine stands a chance to make progress, or if they'd be better suing for peace. More and more countries start to see the later, rather than the first option.
@@captainharlock3998
The pro-Kremlin voices are by and large marginal in Europe, with some notable exceptions like Hungary and Slovakia.
A majority of the population support Ukraine, in some cases more than 90% (Poland, Baltic & Nordic countries) as do all major political parties, because there is a deep historical memory of Russian/Soviet aggression.
Certainly, many of those countries would have to fear for their own security, if Russia were to prevail in Ukraine.
There's a general consensus across the political spectrum to provide support in those countries, in Sweden for example, all political parties are behind it.
I wonder how does snow/ice cover influence landmines, will they still be effective if under deep snow? Also contrary to the video I believe less foliage and snow tracks in winter are beneficial to the attacker as enemy defensive artillery is easier to find and eliminate allowing for spearhead operations assuming adequate air cover.
Your wrong snow has benefited the defender in so many campaigns the only thing is that you can't dig your landmines down with frozen earth so you have put them on top of the soil but their still effective
please include a list next time of overal total help so far to the ukraine, than we can see who are realy helping and countrys like france and italy are almost done nothing
Amazing video as always