Sorry, why 'Stype_reclass' contains only 2 classes, and how do we make overlay analysis with the rest of the factors having 4 classes each while there is class difference among them? I am afraid if this affected the final outcome, the suitability classes which turned out as only 3 classes from 4 additive classes. The rest is I really appreciated your professionally comprehensive tutorial that will directly be used for immediate utilities for the users! Thanks, and keep the good things, bro!
Dear Getinet, all soil types may not have the same suitability for irrigation, and the soil available in the watershed maybe only in some classes. this classification is based on literature, you may get another way of classification but you should have to cite it.
@@givevalueforwaterContinuation of the Getinet query can we overlay the four classes with three classes? If yes, is it affect the final results as a raster?
i am a bit confused...the weights for parameters were slope (38%), lulc (4%) etc. how come in the results section the final weight was for slope (31%), lulc(8%) etc... i didnt understand this part..
Dear tanveer, Don't bory about the values, the main thing here is understanding the way of claculating weight for each parameter using AHP and select suitable areas for surface irrigation
It is very nice dear
Thanks Dr
Thank you for these comprehensive tutorials.
Thank you for your comment Abdul-Karim, don't forget to subscribe the channel.
Thank you very much
well done
Fantastic, I am happy to hear this bakhtyar
Sorry, why 'Stype_reclass' contains only 2 classes, and how do we make overlay analysis with the rest of the factors having 4 classes each while there is class difference among them? I am afraid if this affected the final outcome, the suitability classes which turned out as only 3 classes from 4 additive classes.
The rest is I really appreciated your professionally comprehensive tutorial that will directly be used for immediate utilities for the users! Thanks, and keep the good things, bro!
Dear Getinet, all soil types may not have the same suitability for irrigation, and the soil available in the watershed maybe only in some classes. this classification is based on literature, you may get another way of classification but you should have to cite it.
@@givevalueforwaterContinuation of the Getinet query
can we overlay the four classes with three classes? If yes, is it affect the final results as a raster?
i am a bit confused...the weights for parameters were slope (38%), lulc (4%) etc. how come in the results section the final weight was for slope (31%), lulc(8%) etc... i didnt understand this part..
Dear tanveer,
Don't bory about the values, the main thing here is understanding the way of claculating weight for each parameter using AHP and select suitable areas for surface irrigation
@@givevalueforwater i did understand..but that is the only part i am thinking how you got..if possible can you share the way you calculated?
@@tanveerrahman2164 I have clearly showed sample excel, not the excel part of the manuscript, do you get me
dear bro, I'm researcher and my MSc thesis research is on this title .I need some help from u!! how can I found ur address?!
Dear beyene, let us contact through my email. Kassiea2014@gmail.com