Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024
  • Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet explained by Kent Lennartsson - Research Manager & Founder - Kvaser AB

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @kesicicutter
    @kesicicutter 3 роки тому +1

    perfect explanation, thanks for video.

  • @juspetful
    @juspetful 2 роки тому +1

    Since the video TSN ethernet has emerged and it provides realtime and safety capabilities beyond CAN. Plus the higher bandwidth, flexibility and co-existence of best effort and realtime messages

  • @manikandanj1233
    @manikandanj1233 6 років тому +1

    Hi sir.. Nice explanation :) very informative video

  • @alokpradhan9523
    @alokpradhan9523 3 роки тому +1

    Best explanation

  • @user_uif_ghg_wer_das
    @user_uif_ghg_wer_das 11 місяців тому

    From scope looks the header of the CAN FD has the standard bit rate but the payload has higher bit rate.

  • @bennguyen1313
    @bennguyen1313 4 роки тому

    Very Clear!

  • @batho-peleinnovations172
    @batho-peleinnovations172 6 років тому

    DOES CAN HAVE I.P ADDRESS?

    • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
      @BoBaH_BoBaHoB 6 років тому +3

      No. All traffic is broadcasted.

    • @simonbyholm7460
      @simonbyholm7460 5 років тому +5

      Messages in CAN have an ID identifying the contents/meaning of the message in the contol system. In some higher layer protocols, like J1939, the ID may also identify both the sender and the intended recipient of the message.

    • @rafraph_0
      @rafraph_0 4 роки тому

      @Tomás Franco acctually i cant explain why, but its many different. in CAN bus there isnt master and slave for exemple

    • @sriyapradhan2692
      @sriyapradhan2692 2 роки тому

      @Tom Franco CAN basically relies on arbitration ID, whereas I2C has slave ID and then comes the data or the message