A.9 Income and substitution effects | Consumption - Microeconomics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
  • Learn more: www.policonomics.com/slutskys-...
    Versión en español: • A.9 Efectos de renta y...
    This video explains what the income and substitution effects are, and how to analyse them in order to understand why we buy more goods when their price goes down.
    Related videos:
    -Marshallian and Hicksian demand curves: • A.10 Marshallian and H...
    -Indifference curves: • A.2 Indifference curve...
    Related articles:
    -Marshallian and Hicksian demand curves: www.policonomics.com/marshalli...
    -Marginal rate of transformation: www.policonomics.com/marginal-...
    Thank you for watching!
    www.policonomics.com
    Learn, and enjoy!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @Joy-nz9qv
    @Joy-nz9qv 2 роки тому +11

    i could not understand what my professor was getting at with these diagrams but you explained it so well!!! thank you!!!!

  • @headrushbeats187
    @headrushbeats187 9 років тому +58

    I'm sorry for being immature, but Slutsky is hilarious.

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  9 років тому +5

      multiLOLable Indeed!

    • @Kons213
      @Kons213 6 років тому +7

      There's a Russian football coach with the same last name, Leonid Slutsky, who used to coach team Russia in football. Later moved to the UK to work there, British football fans had a field day with his last name... xd Motto was "In Sluts We Trust"... lol

  • @femiairboy94
    @femiairboy94 3 роки тому +9

    I have a candidacy exam in three weeks, you just saved me about three hours worth of review. God bless.

  • @dennisajala7544
    @dennisajala7544 4 роки тому +6

    A very impressive performance you have here. Thanks for these simplifications. However, I could not comprehend what you expressed when you talked about substitution effect at the beginning of the video. Please I would need it in writing. Thanks.

  • @shwetaram4702
    @shwetaram4702 5 років тому

    In which direction will the substitution effect change the firm’s employment and capital stock if the price of capital increases?

  • @giftyboakye-boateng2323
    @giftyboakye-boateng2323 Рік тому +1

    Can the Hicksian substitute effect be used to discribe a perfect complement preference?

  • @ahmedalam5048
    @ahmedalam5048 3 роки тому

    most concise VDO on the topic .....ever !!!! bestttt :D

  • @ashishdhungana633
    @ashishdhungana633 3 роки тому

    how to draw a graph by ourselves in word or PowerPoint? is there any application to draw a graph like you did?

  • @navinarajan1353
    @navinarajan1353 8 років тому

    Shouldn't the income effect be the derivative of the marsh demand multiplied by the Hicksian demand function not marsh (as derivative of the expenditure function wrt to prices is the hicksian demand)?

  • @fillermusic8760
    @fillermusic8760 6 років тому

    How would the table look like for a decrease in price of the good?

  • @sheema107
    @sheema107 7 років тому

    grt job.really u made economics simple thumbs up!

  • @youarif11
    @youarif11 8 років тому

    what will happen for non-market environmental goods???

  • @palesamofokeng6984
    @palesamofokeng6984 2 роки тому

    so when the indefference curve shifts upwards the equilibrium also changes?

  • @Economaa
    @Economaa 8 років тому

    Minute 4:56 are you sure that there will be no effect on consumer welfare in this case? After all, there still is a price increase. I think you mean there is no effect on quantity of x consumed, however, the effect on consumer welfare is negative.

  • @Prolui
    @Prolui 8 років тому +7

    This was pretty helpful, thanks.

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  8 років тому +1

      Dear +Prolui ,
      We just uploaded our fourth video to our series on Game Theory. It's about the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, we hope you find it interesting!
      ua-cam.com/video/2DDYtd5FDUk/v-deo.html
      If you like it, spread the word!
      Thanks for watching,
      The Policonomics Team

    • @hassankourani4155
      @hassankourani4155 2 роки тому

      @@Policonomics am””

  • @user-md4tw8sp1c
    @user-md4tw8sp1c 4 роки тому

    Great, loving you.

  • @wisdomsimeon431
    @wisdomsimeon431 5 років тому +1

    Great video, thank you!

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  5 років тому

      Thank you for watching! 😀🅿

  • @PhilipDK5800
    @PhilipDK5800 7 років тому +2

    I don't understand the red line parallel to the new budget line?

    • @IsisMarquesDesign
      @IsisMarquesDesign 6 років тому +1

      Yes, so you can compare how much you actually can consume of x,y with your new bugdet and the amount of x,y you'd have consumed with your old budget.
      It is as if you had fixed the utility curve and changed the price ratios.

  • @lourensstrydom1502
    @lourensstrydom1502 5 років тому +3

    I would like to see you listening to yourself once upon a time when you also did this for the fist time

  • @heyptech1726
    @heyptech1726 6 років тому

    amazing thank you

  • @NamalIndrajith-MCP
    @NamalIndrajith-MCP 4 роки тому

    Superb...

  • @Victual88
    @Victual88 10 місяців тому

    Thank you very much

  • @mohammadfarhan7349
    @mohammadfarhan7349 7 років тому +1

    what happen in giffen good case when price of x increases

    • @irGuilty
      @irGuilty 7 років тому +1

      the demand would increase for the giffen good as well

    • @mohammadfarhan7349
      @mohammadfarhan7349 7 років тому

      irGuilty thanks

  • @rossanabarazorda5733
    @rossanabarazorda5733 5 років тому

    gracias,muy bien explicado :)

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  5 років тому

      Gracias a ti ❤ Acabamos de abrir nuestro canal en español! 🅿ua-cam.com/channels/khb76DGIpws2gZGC9UeyHw.html

  • @gouriramkumar8430
    @gouriramkumar8430 7 років тому

    Shouldn't the red parallel restriction line pass through the initial equilibrium?

  • @gabordanos7469
    @gabordanos7469 6 років тому

    veery nice

  • @tahmidishraque6459
    @tahmidishraque6459 5 років тому +1

    Why SE is negative for normal goods? I can't understand :(

    • @irentagreneity212
      @irentagreneity212 5 років тому

      Exactly,bt it's negative.. little difficult to understand.
      *_*

    • @user-md4tw8sp1c
      @user-md4tw8sp1c 4 роки тому

      the substitution effect

    • @andrei-teodorene9729
      @andrei-teodorene9729 4 роки тому +1

      Let's say you have pizza and burgers. A pizza is 3€ and a burger is also 3€. You don't really care about which one you buy, because both are the same price and same tasty. Suddenly, all the restaurant owners say that a pizza is 100€, you simply can't buy a pizza for less then 100€. What are you going to do? Spend 100€ for a damn pizza or just buy burgers for 3€???? I would buy burgers, everybody would do the same, I am not going to buy pizza, so, the demand for pizza is going to decrease, that's why the SE is negative, because you don't want pizza anymore, as it's too expensive, you want cheap and tasty burgers!

    • @Zen-ds4od
      @Zen-ds4od 11 місяців тому

      For price increase, the SE is negative. Because increase in price will make you want to consume less of it and more of the other good instead. For price decrease it is positive.

  • @raaifriz3333
    @raaifriz3333 3 роки тому

    Why do we even talk about the income effect? There is no change in Income right? Could someone please explain

    • @Zen-ds4od
      @Zen-ds4od 11 місяців тому

      increase in purchasing power, same as income increase

  • @mdfahim8792
    @mdfahim8792 3 роки тому

    Sister its not math its eco

  • @nickspencer5234
    @nickspencer5234 2 роки тому +1

    stupidly overcomplicated

  • @10pmmemes88
    @10pmmemes88 5 років тому +2

    How much did you pay for a corpse to narrate the video?