Can King Mswati III of Eswatini move to a democratic constitutional monarchy?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @tafadzwachandigere6507
    @tafadzwachandigere6507 Рік тому +5

    But democracy in Africa is not working though

    • @SirFrantzKrzysztof
      @SirFrantzKrzysztof Рік тому

      Correct man. Look at South Africa now, am even ashamed of being South African citizen. 😢😢😢

    • @HRHSiyathokozaMweli
      @HRHSiyathokozaMweli Рік тому +1

      @@SirFrantzKrzysztofSouth Africa is the best. You recognise this when you travel outside the country.

    • @anthonytesla8382
      @anthonytesla8382 Місяць тому

      ​@@HRHSiyathokozaMweliSouth Africa is the tallest dwarf

  • @kairosunltd130
    @kairosunltd130 Рік тому

    Nice one. And the plot thickens in 2021to date! My goodness! Things are worse now in Swaziland, politically, socially,economically,the education and health system have deteriorated,the labour conditions and laws are also worsening and the corruption is at an all time high and they don't even hide it anymore. It's in the faces of the Swazi people.

  • @zion607
    @zion607 Місяць тому

    Why should they transition to a democratic constitutional monarchy they have the last absolute monarchy in Africa and they should maintain it because it is a better system

  • @thembekilemsomi1149
    @thembekilemsomi1149 9 місяців тому +1

    Eswatini Kingdom lasted from 1968 to

  • @thecitizen492
    @thecitizen492 Рік тому

    Something wrong with us, shame. Whats happening with us?

  • @zebrastudios2347
    @zebrastudios2347 Рік тому

    Thank you GGG for exposing this mad fake king.

  • @mfundomotsa
    @mfundomotsa 7 місяців тому

    Unemanga

  • @mhlabuhlangenedlamini1521
    @mhlabuhlangenedlamini1521 Рік тому +1

    It’s amaizing why, every time any Tom, Dick and Harry, present themselves as some, wannabe political history or political science and/or constitutionalism guru of note, when talking about Eswatini. Yet by just by a few lines spoken,, and noting the stretching of their facial muscles and big eyes, here and there, trying to conjure up a quasi-academic authoritative demeanor,, one quickly notices, that these chance takers, have one thing in common,, and that is, usually, if not always, they have their constitutionalism fundamentals wrong, to begin with. Firstly, in this case here, Eswatini and His Majesty King Mswati 111 and the entire royal family (that I am a full member of,, and not afraid nor ashamed of it at all, because, it is after all my natural birth selection identity) and the enchanting EMaswati nation and people as a whole are a kingdom, nation-state. What does this mean, regarding the sovereign authority and power type this falls under, in terms of international law and political science,,,🤔🤔. For crying out loud, bru,,,, it’s called Monarchical Sovereignty and not Popular Sovereignty. Now, under all and any Monarchical Sovereignty, is the undeniable universalism of the Devine Legal Right to rule. It’s not peculiar to Eswatini, hence it being a universalism. Again, this is the Sovereign Authority, that, colonialist and imperialist, you seem to hail, who overthrew our Pan- Africanist, traditional and/or native, original African constitutionalism DNA, and imposed their African subjugation constitutional instruments such as The Statute of Westminster. I don’t have the time to educate, such wannabes, who clearly don’t seem to know their front from the back. Secondly,,, don’t be stupid,, if you bothered to do just a little research regarding what you call the constitution at independence of Eswatini (The Westminster ‘constitution’),,this was not a constitution, but only a Statute of Westminster, a colonial and imperialist statute promulgated in Westminster to be the fundamental law the British Empire was to use where ever they had colonized, to rule using. And here you are,, glorifying the supremacy of a colonial and imperialist oppressive law and constitutional processes on us Africans. I guess,, to much of apartheid and/or ‘bantustan’ educational background is to blame in your very naive statement. Therefore, my brother, His Majesty, King Mswati 111’s legitimacy to rule, is not derived from Popular Sovereignty, but is Monarchical Sovereignty, the Monarch’s constitutional Devine legal right to rule (International law 101). The Mornach is not a President, nor are their constitutionalism legal basis of authority to rule the same. A President doesn’t rule only Monarchs do. Monarchs are not elected, but presidents are. Monarchs have what is called in political science philosophy, Constituted Authority and Power, yet Presidents, have Contituent Authority and power. Go and first read and do your research and get your concepts and fundamentals right first before you talk and make a fool of yourself and expose your ignorance to the world. Thirdly, from which university did you graduate or learn from that, multiparty democracy is the the holy grail of democracy?? What misguided reasoning. Look,, we EMaswati know our story and are the best to tell it. Stick to your since 1994 constitutionalism in your country and yes, we are all waiting to to see, the ‘rainbow-nation’ weave out of your multiparty democracy. If you ask me,, you have completely lost your African identity and there is no hope to recover it even if you wanted too. Democracy is not to be embraced blindly as Africans, to allow it to overthrow our core traditional constitutionalism DNA. There is plenty much more I could say but,,I do however trust, you get the message. It also, interesting, to note the background picture 🤔🤔🤔, what exactly is the point of its posturing relative to your submission???? Just wondering.

    • @anthonytesla8382
      @anthonytesla8382 Місяць тому

      You've said a lot and actually said nothing all in one comment. Also your spelling is pretty atrocious for a royal. That's even if you are one, which I doubt.