Margaret MacMillan: Thinking About War Before 1914

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @h.e.hazelhorst9838
    @h.e.hazelhorst9838 Рік тому +2

    Another excellent lecture!

  • @robertczar2576
    @robertczar2576 9 років тому +27

    I love Margaret MacMillan's lectures. I an amateur enthusiast on European dynasties prior and through WWI. She has given me an objective view point and detailed information that most mainstream documentaries are lacking.

  • @garyb2392
    @garyb2392 Рік тому +1

    What an awesome talk! TY

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones Місяць тому

    Macmillan starts around 2:10.
    She is an excellent speaker, always very plausible and often correct.

  • @Doc_Tar
    @Doc_Tar Рік тому +7

    The more of MacMillan's lectures I experience the closer I sense I get to understanding how sophisticated Europe went mad in the first half of the 20th century.

  • @mavisformula
    @mavisformula Рік тому +1

    Another excellent lecture, I do enjoy them very much. The only disagreement I had is her comment regarding the British in the Boer War of 1899-1902. From all that I have read, they never fought in their red coat uniforms (as she stated regarding their heavy losses earlier on). They had discarded these in the Anglo-Sudan War a few years earlier and hadn't used them regularly since the 1880's. However they did suffer heavily against the Boers who were well-trained, well supplied and knew the land better and so could manoeuvre around, causing the necessity for the British to attach them head on.

  • @davidmackie8552
    @davidmackie8552 2 роки тому +2

    What a sensible and erudite person!

  • @MrHmjg
    @MrHmjg 3 роки тому +3

    entertaining, never dull...

  • @mariannesuesli5680
    @mariannesuesli5680 Рік тому

    Such a delight to listen to her although it's a somehow bleak outlook

  • @PalofGrrr
    @PalofGrrr 6 років тому +4

    In the USMC the unwritten rule is: You dont have to like it...You just have to do it. that includes grad school If you think about it, that applies to a lot in life

  • @DavidWilliams-hv7so
    @DavidWilliams-hv7so 3 роки тому +3

    Have watched all 3 of the lectures on this series. Now in the 21st century society has gone from being so abstract part of war to being part of war in an intimate instrument of war. We as a society were shocked at hearing about civilian attacks from the military and almost a disbelieve things like the Hallocost. To see it atrocious on TV each evening. Now we are all soldiers.

  • @f1refall
    @f1refall Рік тому

    I feel its worth adding, while discussing blockading germany & the impact on its civilian population, that Germany also aimed to do this to the English, although less effectively

  • @Dav1Gv
    @Dav1Gv 3 роки тому +1

    Henty's book about the Battle of Fredricksburg in the American Civil War did - sort of - have a different plot but I certainly don't blame Prof MacMillan for not reading all of these books.

  • @RobertWarren65
    @RobertWarren65 6 років тому +2

    Ah GA Henty - saved my primary school career! I owe that man the reading speed I later developed and the ability to summarise the book! Now I discover that the plot was all the same but it helped and I have lived in blissful ignorance throughout my life!!

    • @nicklive66
      @nicklive66 Рік тому

      GA Henty. Still read his books now and then, along with Anthony Buckerage's.

  • @michaelsommers2356
    @michaelsommers2356 3 роки тому +1

    When quoting Garnet Wolseley, MacMillan should also have pointed out that he was the very model of a modern major general.

    • @zeljkokuvara6145
      @zeljkokuvara6145 Рік тому +1

      Yes, but only in matters vegetable, animal, and mineral

    • @michaelsommers2356
      @michaelsommers2356 Рік тому

      @@zeljkokuvara6145 But what else is there?

    • @zeljkokuvara6145
      @zeljkokuvara6145 Рік тому +1

      @@michaelsommers2356 matters mathematical, equations, both the simple and quadratical

    • @michaelsommers2356
      @michaelsommers2356 Рік тому

      @@zeljkokuvara6145 Maybe. But I know many cheerful facts about the square of the hypotenuse. So there!

    • @zeljkokuvara6145
      @zeljkokuvara6145 Рік тому

      @@michaelsommers2356 aaaa as Rumsfeld would say the known unknowns.
      But what about the unknown unknowns? What is sacred? Of what is the spirit made? What is worth living for, and what is worth dying for?

  • @CristinaDaniel-e2i
    @CristinaDaniel-e2i 19 днів тому

    Oh, come on, not even a mention of the Romanians who fought at Plevna?

  • @ИринаКим-ъ5ч
    @ИринаКим-ъ5ч Місяць тому

    Smith Cynthia Wilson Susan Lewis Jose

  • @kellyanquoe
    @kellyanquoe 4 роки тому +1

    here in 2020 remanants of fading power groups struggle while the great grands of musty dynasties party

  • @ElizabethReategui
    @ElizabethReategui 10 років тому

    Who's the first speaker? Can you tell me his name?

  • @EquipteHarry
    @EquipteHarry Місяць тому

    Lopez John Garcia Richard Lewis Richard

  • @ДмитрийДепутатов
    @ДмитрийДепутатов 2 місяці тому

    Brown Shirley Thomas Kimberly Hall Eric

  • @CristinaDaniel-e2i
    @CristinaDaniel-e2i 19 днів тому

    Ha, ha! 'And the other place' - do not mention MacBeth.

  • @williambeaumont1312
    @williambeaumont1312 4 роки тому +1

    Darwin to blame for WW1 and WW2.

  • @jesuisravi
    @jesuisravi 5 років тому +3

    the military mind: an oxymoron.

  • @agneschamot7284
    @agneschamot7284 3 роки тому +1

    Hahaha, really no clue about European history. I suggest all to read Sleepwalkers / Clark and then choose what really happend or what is agitation and propaganda of the Alies - who still hate Germany

  • @RobertPaskulovich-fz1th
    @RobertPaskulovich-fz1th Рік тому

    How did invading Serbia turn out for Austria?