Nasa just revealed Huge Update on Inside Blue Origin’s Orbital Reef
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 чер 2024
- Nasa just revealed Huge Update on Inside Blue Origin’s Orbital Reef
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #nasa
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
===
Nasa just revealed Huge Update on Inside Blue Origin’s Orbital Reef
Assuming the role of the ISS is undoubtedly the primary objective for numerous organizations presently, notably the Blue Origin-led Orbital Reef initiative.
Progress in the development of this space station has been sluggish over the years, often encountering skepticism regarding its feasibility.
Nasa just revealed Huge Update on Inside Blue Origin’s Orbital ReefHowever, NASA's recent comprehensive update on the space station signifies a significant shift from previous vague disclosures.
What does this latest update reveal about the design and potential timeline for constructing the Orbital Reef space station? Could its realization be imminent?
Join us as we explore these questions further in today's episode of Great SpaceX.
Nasa just revealed Huge Update on Inside Blue Origin’s Orbital Reef
As you're aware, NASA has been diligently strategizing for the replacement of the ISS as its retirement looms within the next six years. Departing from past practices, NASA has opted to enlist the expertise of private companies, awarding contracts for the design and construction of new space stations.
These companies wasted no time in unveiling a plethora of innovative concepts, including the Axiom Space Station, Starlab, and Orbital Reef. Among them, Orbital Reef has captured significant attention, primarily due to its association with aerospace giant Blue Origin. Furthermore, its collaboration with Sierra Space, incorporating the LIFE inflatable habitat system model, adds another layer of intrigue to this ambitious venture.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the UA-cam Fair Use copyright guidelines: ua-cam.com/users/intlen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you. - Наука та технологія
"Boeing has been tasked with building..."
*Well, we know how well that's gonna work out well ahead of time.*
😂😂😂
Whatever happened to the company that plans to do construction in space? The info is crazy. They claim to complete a huge space station with artificial gravity rings in just a month.
I wouldn't describe Blue Origin as "Aerospace Giant", maybe a "Potential Aerospace Giant".
I keep wondering how Blue Origin is considered a aerospace giant when they have truly accomplished so little so far.
How is Blue Horizon considered to be an "Aerospace Giant"???
They've never even been to orbit!!!
Sierra: "Where's my core module, Jeff?"
Blue origin is not a major space company, a player for certain but not major, ula was a major space company and they are more impactful than blue origin is. Boeing is building parts of this station? Yeah that is likely to not end well.
*The Boeing-built parts will not "end"... they will just keep on drinking up funds while never actually getting completed*
Diversity, Inclusivity and Equity hiring is a great way to get woke and go broke.
Let's wait for this plan's progress
Lol is this some weird SpaceX flex?
@@mervstash3692 no, simple assessment of the reality of the situation. Spacex is not planning or building any space station as far as i am aware. What has blue origin done outside a sub orbital vehicle or supplying engines? The answer is not much. Boeing while good at one point is seemingly suffering from incompetence lately, almost russian style in its nature. Ula used to be one of the top dogs but now they are being sold and their new vehicle can not be reused which is the name of the game now. How long has the space industry been after a reuseable vehicle? A relative nobody came in figured out what the pros should have and is looking to do it again. The old pros are way off their game, corrupted by greed and laziness, everything spacex has done, is doing, should have been done 50 years ago. We have prototype engine tech for use on spaceships sitting on the shelves collecting dust that were developed in the 60s. Call it what you will, but the fact of the matter is until boeing gets its act in gear they can not be trusted to deliver and blue origin comes up with plans and has not delivered on much of anything, yet.
How true!
Yes 👍 il believe it wen I see it thanks for your updates David 🚀❤️🇬🇧👌👍
Thanks for your great comment, David♥️
Great vid!
♥️♥️♥️
If Boing is involved then delay all dates with a factor 3.
😂😂😂
Blue Origins Orbital Reef is nothing more than their latest CGI presentation. The laundry list you read off enumerating the functions that will be available is nothing more than what any space station would have. Anything this long-winded sounds like A.I.
Did you get free Amazon Prime for this?
...."Establish new destinations in low earth orbit"... like where, for example. Only ChatGPT could concoct something like this.
IMHO the estimated time frames are far too optimistic for the companies involved in Orbital Reef. Blue Origin is in its infancy, in order to be cost effective they have to perfect their re-usability of the booster and the reliability and durability of their engines. Sierra Space' Dream Chaser hasn't been in space yet, they have a whole campaign of qualifying and re-entry analysis as well as its autonomous programming, if they plan to make it the primary manned transport to Orbital Reef, that's years away. The only hardware that has been proven in space is the original Bigelow modules with one floating in space and the other on the ISS. I'm afraid that I would be inclined to add 10 years to current estimates, but I'm confident it will proceed, just not as quickly as we'd like.
ORP will still be on the ground long after SpaceX has landed on Mars…
So putting a docking module on an inflatable node seems rather risky. Say a docked craft has some sort of attitude control issue while docked, could this not cause significant flexing/tearing of the inflatable module?
Hopefully, they can update more solutions about thiss
It would be no different regardless of what it was made out of.
A legitimate concern that I'm sure that the engineers have already considered quite thoroughly.
There is a structural spindle down the center axis of a LIFE module. No flexion. The inflatable hab does not provide any structural support aside from its own; the spindle is what connects to things. If your RCS is robust enough to bend that spindle, it would have already torn itself away from the docking clamps.
Blue Origin. LOL.
Thinking about how many of those inflatables One Starship could loft into orbit... And think of this. If each of the refueling Starships could loft just one of these up each launch and throughout the Artemis program, keep doing this. Wow! Think about a hundred of these for a space station.
Won't one Starship in orbit have more habitable volume than the ISS? NASA should just pay for one Starship launch.
👍👍👍
F'k no. Of course it won't. You have to actually put stuff into Starship first. Do that and you will barely be able to move inside.
Plus this version of Starship is only 40% of the size of what your figures are based off.
No, it won't. You can NOT use the tank cubage without at the least putting airlocks into the common domes and venting the tankage completely. You would also have to add tons of insulation to make the structure habitable. Remember, the so-called starship isn't a sleeved construct; the outer wall of the vehicle is the outer wall of a fuel or oxidizer tank, with no insulation or sufficient density to withstand micrometeorites or space FOD.
Although a lot of Starship is taken with tanks and engines, it could still hold quite a lot of those inflatable models. Lets say six of them. Keep doing that and soon you could have a very large rotating station.
IMO the reliance on Blue Origin will cause delays in Orbital Reef deployment. After 20+ years of effort, BO has not yet launched anything to orbit.
What is Plan B for ISS replacement?
Axiom Space. Their first module is due to be launched to ISS late this year, early next year, with a module every year scheduled. Once assembled, they decouple from ISS and start independent operation.
SpaceX 🚀
Use inflatable as a safer way to land on the moon instead of a space station. You still have to fill it with uninflatable hardware to be useful. Twice the work. 🎉
Great suggestion
Not really. Check out the structure of a LIFE module. There is a metallic spindle down the center that the bag is placed over. That hollow spindle is where support systems like life support, computer support, and power coaxials are housed. Around that spindle are the panels for the flooring and walls. Once deployed and inflated, the floors are unfolded and secured, then the walls are placed by the astronauts. You havbe to bring in the new experiments true, but power runs, water runs, networking runs are already in place, and the space is subdivided. Just like the current ISS, it would be plug in and go.
@@wesleybeaver Thanks for the info!
OLD BLUE ORIGIN CAN'T EVEN BUILD A ROCKET ! 😢 WHAT ARE U GOING TOO GIVE THEM MONEY ? FOR 40 YEARS & JUST MAYBE THE PAPER WORK MIGHT BE DONE BUY THEN ! 😮
They are having a big plan with New Glenn
We won't see this tile maybe 2040.Blue origin is slow, slow, slow.
😂😂😂
*Many thanks, Kevin; and please forgive our snarkiness*
We're snarking at the product (a Space Reef? Really? They couldn't come up with a better name?) not your video, which is actually quite well done
Thanks for your great contribution. We're always welcome all your comment because this is so important for our team to make better video, so keep following and discussing on our channel. As for Orbital Reef, let's wait to see how they will progress their plans☺️
Excellent!
Wonder how many billions will be wasted on this project. Pretty sure private space stations will lead to a complete failure of this project.
Let's wait for their next plans. I hope they can success, so we will have new homes in space.
Research carried out on these stations get used to help us on earth. The money spent on space missions and research is a fraction of a percent of the countries GDP.
What project has NASA controlled that hasn't been late and over budget? Private projects usually are less cost.
We needed space station with gravity. 9 or 12 Falkon together.
That depends on which companies are involved.
Imagine doing at least 2 minutes of research......
Come of fella. You can do it.
And lol all these weirdos with the Boeing door jokes... your boy has an incidents like that on a daily basis.
Blue origin is good at animating concepts...nothing more!
Umm how about SpaceX and its proven launch capabilities?
Lets not forget Blue Origin hasnt launched anything to orbit.
😂😂😂
Anything from NASA, click uninterested or don't recommend channel😂 Not a fan
A totally stupid design. Only idiots could make something even similar to the old space station, and not make a Rotational Space Station. It would not be difficult to make a rotational station even while using all of the same components. Using the center parts as a hub. And the expandable sections attached off of the hub. They could put no less than 6 to 8 expandable modules off of a hub section. And to expand, just add another hub section, and more expandable sections attached to the hubs.
Is it possible to build in space? What I mean is construct a large facility or even a ship with materials delivered via rockets. Maybe a Death Star lol