Amazon USA - amzn.to/3efeBWe UK - amzn.to/3qkZVau ND Filter Kit (non magnetic) - USA - amzn.to/3ecpnwa UK - amzn.to/3c1osfs Stepping rings USA - amzn.to/3sT3F4p UK - amzn.to/3c4Z88h If you find the reviews useful please consider supporting the channel via Patreon - www.patreon.com/mrbazreviews Or by using the affiliate links (this helps fund future reviews) and subscribing this helps the channel grow!
Thanks, will do! All Ok here bit slow at the moment stuff coming in, hopefully will pick up at some point Appreciate you stopping by hope you're well your end
Interesting to hear that these have strong magneticism. I remember seeing a video once where the reviewer was testing out the magnetic variable ND from K&F and its strength was absolutely shockingly bad. Could have been a dud batch or perhaps this kit is just better made. Great review!
Great Vlog, very informative, you talked about the stepping rings, are they just the normal set you can get from them, then the filter is the magnetic bit.
Just got all the information I needed from this video here. Great work! Is there any difference in image quality to use the largest size filter with step up rings comparing to using each individual filter size for each lenses? Leaving the costs aside.
@@MrBazReviews I am interested in this product actually. Should I get the largest size which I intended in buying for future proofing? My current largest lense is 67mm at the moment. The lenses I am thinking to buy has 82mm this means that I need 4 to 5 step up rings. With this product, stacking 3 filters and 4-5 step up rings from 67mm. Will it hit the optical path? Might have to test it out. Stacking multiple step up rings will not hit the optical path no matter what?
@@marcustan5133 Buy the size that you will be using, if an 82mm isn't something you would use often then I wouldn't get that size. It really depends I can't say for me I use 77mm largest, so that size would make sense. But other filters I just don't use a CPL on an ultra wide angle lens ever (doesn't look good). So for this reason I didn't buy a 77mm one
Do you know if this would fit on a canon sx50 bridge camera? All i know so far is that i need a "filter adapter FA-DC67A", but im not sure if this adapter already has the filter adapter that would fit. Im not sure what to buy.
@@MrBazReviews got one, love it. The normal filter was always getting stuck on the uv filter. This one is also turning easier. I'll try to also do some markings, it's a hassle to find the right position
At the moment no, I told them to make other filters available (ie various ND ones) in the magnetic design. So I can't say if and when they might do that, it would make a lot of sense to have that option. Otherwise I see they offer non magnetic ND kits (4/8/64/1000) screw in ones in the same style pouch
Probably not the Tokina shown here on APS-C has a 104° field of view, that lens is 113°. You could try the biggest size and if it didn't work return it
3:40 The angle of view can vary (believe it or not even on identical focal lengths). This test was at 17mm, so there was a bit there. Once you get to 19/20mm it's pretty much gone. So yes it will vignette a bit at 17mm and wider.
@@MrBazReviews thanks for the quick reply. I'm guessing the vignette would be even greater if I used their magnetic variable ND? If I was to buy a larger filter size and use a step up ring for my 17mm ultra wide, any idea how much larger I'd need to go to avoid vignetting? The lens thread is 67mm Thanks again for this video
@@alexmdelfont7304 They do a 72mm or 77mm, depends if you are ever going to use a larger size. I would think 72mm would be enough to eliminate the vignette at 17mm. I've not use the magnetic variable ND. Other option is a square system, which has pros/cons of it's own.
@@MrBazReviews thanks yeah I plan to get the tamron 35-150 which has an 82mm thread so would probably aim to get the same as that. It's just a but annoying to not be able to use the lens hood, and also have a much wider but on the end of the lens!
I also bought this product. One thing I like it BUT on their website it is said even with all 3 filters no Vignetting with 16 mm wide lenses. That is not true at all with 16mm and ND + CPL Filter I get really bad Vignetting in all corners. I am suing a 67 mm lens. Would it make any differences getting the 82mm kit and use a step up ring?
Stacking is a problem, on many filters including this one. I would go larger size and use a stepping ring. Also a CPL will always cause problems on ultra wide angle lenses, due to the difference in angles, the polarisation effect will be uneven less in the middle more on the corners/edges. For some lenses, the square filter kits might be a better option for ND's - depends on what you want to use
You can find info about compatible filter size for Kase filters but I don't know about other brands. The common rule is the more wide focal length your lens has and more wide aperture is, the bigger filter you need. For example, for ultra-wide lens f2.0 you have to buy an enormous filters if you want to stack them.
Amazon USA - amzn.to/3efeBWe UK - amzn.to/3qkZVau
ND Filter Kit (non magnetic) - USA - amzn.to/3ecpnwa UK - amzn.to/3c1osfs
Stepping rings USA - amzn.to/3sT3F4p UK - amzn.to/3c4Z88h
If you find the reviews useful please consider supporting the channel via Patreon - www.patreon.com/mrbazreviews
Or by using the affiliate links (this helps fund future reviews) and subscribing this helps the channel grow!
Nice clear and concise video, told me all I needed to know without all the faff of some other vids, thanks man 👍
Appreciate that, I'm not into the overly long padded out/waffle type videos. I prefer to get on with it
@@MrBazReviews yup, with you on that one.
Hi mate, I hope you are keeping well,
Great review as always,
Take care of yourself,
Thanks, will do! All Ok here bit slow at the moment stuff coming in, hopefully will pick up at some point
Appreciate you stopping by hope you're well your end
Interesting to hear that these have strong magneticism. I remember seeing a video once where the reviewer was testing out the magnetic variable ND from K&F and its strength was absolutely shockingly bad. Could have been a dud batch or perhaps this kit is just better made. Great review!
I never had a problem with them coming off, I also don't doubt QC can vary a bit.
Thanks for the Review
No problem hope it helped
Great Vlog, very informative, you talked about the stepping rings, are they just the normal set you can get from them, then the filter is the magnetic bit.
Use any normal stepping rings, then put the magnetic part on that
Just got all the information I needed from this video here. Great work!
Is there any difference in image quality to use the largest size filter with step up rings comparing to using each individual filter size for each lenses? Leaving the costs aside.
There's no downside to using stepping rings, no hit to optical path as it's clear space. I avoid multi stacking filters, that can hit the optics.
@@MrBazReviews I am interested in this product actually. Should I get the largest size which I intended in buying for future proofing? My current largest lense is 67mm at the moment. The lenses I am thinking to buy has 82mm this means that I need 4 to 5 step up rings. With this product, stacking 3 filters and 4-5 step up rings from 67mm. Will it hit the optical path? Might have to test it out.
Stacking multiple step up rings will not hit the optical path no matter what?
@@marcustan5133 Buy the size that you will be using, if an 82mm isn't something you would use often then I wouldn't get that size. It really depends I can't say for me I use 77mm largest, so that size would make sense. But other filters I just don't use a CPL on an ultra wide angle lens ever (doesn't look good). So for this reason I didn't buy a 77mm one
Do you know if this would fit on a canon sx50 bridge camera? All i know so far is that i need a "filter adapter FA-DC67A", but im not sure if this adapter already has the filter adapter that would fit. Im not sure what to buy.
That's the official filter adapter for that camera, it's 67mm so get it and you can get the filter size you need.
Nice video, thanks!
Thanks I try my best, decent enough kit as I'm sure you'll find out
@@MrBazReviews I've had it a short while already so I can agree!
Thank You!!!!!
You're welcome!
Very nice review. Would 35mm lens FF have this vignetting issue or it is not too wide for this?
Only seems to show up at ultra wide angle, 35mm isn't that wide so won't be a problem
Only seems to show up at ultra wide angle, 35mm isn't that wide so won't be a problem
How is the cpl filter turning, is it sliding on the magnetic ring or it's exactly like a normal cpl filter?
It's not like a normal filter, it rotates on the magnetic holder - it has been strong enough to hold in place having used it for a while.
@@MrBazReviews got one, love it. The normal filter was always getting stuck on the uv filter. This one is also turning easier. I'll try to also do some markings, it's a hassle to find the right position
@@cristibaluta Yes that's a good point markings would be useful. Still the kit overall is very decent really
Nice review! Do they offer nd64 magnetic on their own?
At the moment no, I told them to make other filters available (ie various ND ones) in the magnetic design. So I can't say if and when they might do that, it would make a lot of sense to have that option.
Otherwise I see they offer non magnetic ND kits (4/8/64/1000) screw in ones in the same style pouch
There are 3 types of k&f uv filters which one would you recommend , thanks alot
The one I reviewed I found to be good, I usually avoid the super budget ones as they have less coatings
I wonder how these compare to the Neweer ones?
I've not used them, so hard to comment.
From 49mm filter size to 77mm will knockout the vniting from laowa 9mmnf2.8 ?
Probably not the Tokina shown here on APS-C has a 104° field of view, that lens is 113°. You could try the biggest size and if it didn't work return it
Thanks for this, would they vignette using tamron 17-28mm on full frame?
3:40
The angle of view can vary (believe it or not even on identical focal lengths). This test was at 17mm, so there was a bit there. Once you get to 19/20mm it's pretty much gone. So yes it will vignette a bit at 17mm and wider.
@@MrBazReviews thanks for the quick reply. I'm guessing the vignette would be even greater if I used their magnetic variable ND?
If I was to buy a larger filter size and use a step up ring for my 17mm ultra wide, any idea how much larger I'd need to go to avoid vignetting? The lens thread is 67mm
Thanks again for this video
@@alexmdelfont7304 They do a 72mm or 77mm, depends if you are ever going to use a larger size. I would think 72mm would be enough to eliminate the vignette at 17mm. I've not use the magnetic variable ND. Other option is a square system, which has pros/cons of it's own.
@@MrBazReviews thanks yeah I plan to get the tamron 35-150 which has an 82mm thread so would probably aim to get the same as that. It's just a but annoying to not be able to use the lens hood, and also have a much wider but on the end of the lens!
I also bought this product. One thing I like it BUT on their website it is said even with all 3 filters no Vignetting with 16 mm wide lenses. That is not true at all with 16mm and ND + CPL Filter I get really bad Vignetting in all corners. I am suing a 67 mm lens. Would it make any differences getting the 82mm kit and use a step up ring?
Stacking is a problem, on many filters including this one. I would go larger size and use a stepping ring. Also a CPL will always cause problems on ultra wide angle lenses, due to the difference in angles, the polarisation effect will be uneven less in the middle more on the corners/edges.
For some lenses, the square filter kits might be a better option for ND's - depends on what you want to use
You can find info about compatible filter size for Kase filters but I don't know about other brands. The common rule is the more wide focal length your lens has and more wide aperture is, the bigger filter you need. For example, for ultra-wide lens f2.0 you have to buy an enormous filters if you want to stack them.