Sony SCD-777ES SACD Player Demonstration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @AudioElectronicsChicago
    @AudioElectronicsChicago 4 роки тому +4

    I love the ES Series
    What a beauty

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  4 роки тому +1

      Audio Electronics this unit is an incredible piece of engineering, will be hard to let this one go.

    • @dougtalbert7532
      @dougtalbert7532 4 роки тому

      Chris W did u sell the 777ES?

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  4 роки тому

      Doug Talbert it’s for sale on eBay.

  • @stevenwhite8936
    @stevenwhite8936 2 роки тому

    very nice does it play any hybrid discs ?

  • @DJkwaz
    @DJkwaz 3 роки тому +2

    So, before SACD players had HDMI, the only way to hear the SACD layer was through the analog outputs? The digital outputs didn't bitstream the SACD layer?

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, that seems to be the case. Doesn’t appear the optical out could handle the SACD layer.

    • @Poraqui
      @Poraqui 3 роки тому +6

      In 2003 Sony launched the SCD-XA9000ES which for the first time could send DSD 2CH\MCH data digitally to a suitable receiver. This digital output preceded HDMI and it was called "i.Link", basically a FireWire cable and interface. So this players could dispense the analog outputs. The caveat was that at the time the only receiver that could get this output was Sony's very own STR-DA9000ES. As long as no equalizing or surround effects were used, the DSD bitstream remained unchanged from iLink input to the receiver's DACs that, by all accounts didn't downgraded to PCM prior to analog conversion.

  • @sound-flies
    @sound-flies 2 роки тому

    Wow awesome hope you got a good price for it

  • @KK-of6hj
    @KK-of6hj 3 роки тому

    名機

  • @spandauchan8131
    @spandauchan8131 2 роки тому

    Are u sell this sony ?

  • @roendi1
    @roendi1 3 роки тому +1

    I have the same same. So sad no surround. So it must go for an Oppo

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  3 роки тому +1

      Did the music originally have more than two channels? Not likely.

    • @roendi1
      @roendi1 3 роки тому +1

      Have you ever heard Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon in surround?

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  3 роки тому +1

      @@roendi1 it wasn’t recorded in surround so no.

    • @roendi1
      @roendi1 3 роки тому

      You really have no idea. You could already buy the LP as a Qudrophonie

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  3 роки тому +1

      @@roendi1 that’s four channel, not true surround sound as we know it today. It was a gimmick.

  • @sound-flies
    @sound-flies 2 роки тому

    Now need one hahaha

  • @abdulsushi
    @abdulsushi 2 роки тому

    hola cual es el precio y donde esta el cd player? gracias

  • @ЮрийЛысенко-м9л
    @ЮрийЛысенко-м9л 4 роки тому

    Сколько стоит б у

  • @cubinn149
    @cubinn149 3 роки тому

    U can play abit of the song they cant sue u for that they just say dont

  • @ZERO-CAPACITANCE
    @ZERO-CAPACITANCE 4 роки тому +1

    I like the option of listening to the Multichannel version to compare.

    • @chrisw.3077
      @chrisw.3077  4 роки тому +8

      zerocapacitance1 stereo is by definition multi-channel.

    • @MichelLinschoten
      @MichelLinschoten 2 роки тому +2

      Hahaha talking about ignorant

    • @raydm4015
      @raydm4015 Рік тому +1

      2 channel > multi channel..

    • @white.lodge.dale.cooper
      @white.lodge.dale.cooper 7 місяців тому

      Multichannel is a gimmick; it has no power. It's great for film, but for music, properly mixed and mastered stereo is the only way to go. It's so much more powerful.

    • @ZERO-CAPACITANCE
      @ZERO-CAPACITANCE 7 місяців тому

      You guys are sort of right. The main differentiating feature for the SACD format is discrete multichannel recordings. I hope that clears things up?