Why This Doctor Who Character Will NEVER Come Back

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2022
  • Doctor Who fans love to see iconic characters returning, but here's why the highly requested character "The Rani" will most likely literally never be able to return...
    ► Patreon
    / harbowholmes
    ► Subscribe!
    / harbowholmes
    ► Twitter
    / harbowholmes
    ► Discord
    / discord
    ► Reddit
    / harbowholmes
    #DoctorWho #TheRani #TimeLord
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 411

  • @HarboWholmes
    @HarboWholmes  Рік тому +17

    Support the channel!
    www.patreon.com/harbowholmes

    • @ptolemeeselenion1542
      @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому

      Some theories speculates that the High Priestess Ohila of the Sisterhood of Karn might be an incarnation of The Rani who rejected her identity and evil, psychotic experimentations-- which would explain why both her and The Doctor acts so familiar toward each other, as well as her schemes and behavior been reminiscent of The Rani.

    • @ptolemeeselenion1542
      @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому

      @11:22 Actually some more, if you count Perusa, the War Chief... and, to some extent, the Celestial Toymaker (he's a conceptual being, but it has been stated in the Wilderness Era novels that he has been hosting the body of a Time Lord and childhood friend of both the Doctor, the Rani and The Master for untold aeons, least until the Fifth Doctor deletes the Celestial Toymaker off-series) .

    • @graysonlaudat272
      @graysonlaudat272 Рік тому

      Bring back the rani

    • @waynegray2284
      @waynegray2284 Рік тому

      That pi box is about 20 mins away from me

    • @CaptDingDong
      @CaptDingDong Рік тому

      The ban on bringing back time lord characters is so phony, especially considering they effortlessly invented, re-created or revived lady time lords during the Moffatt and Chibnall era whenever they wanted to, without caring about "the time-lords are no more" supposed new rules they had set up. How can one say there is no demand for them, while also acknowledging there are tons of fans clamoring for them to return? Which is it? Face it, the show runners don't care about pleasing the fans, and that's why they haven't come back.

  • @josgibbons6777
    @josgibbons6777 Рік тому +710

    "A big part of the Rani's appeal was basically just that she was a female alternative to the Master." I'm sick of this bare-faced lie. The Master's appeal is being the anti-Doctor; the Rani, who has a low opinion of them both for focusing on each other, is a scientist without research ethics.

    • @carealoo744
      @carealoo744 Рік тому +32

      Agreed.

    • @ftumschk
      @ftumschk Рік тому +60

      _"We asked writers Pip and Jane Baker to come up with a story featuring The Master and _*_an evil female counterpart,_*_ who was NOT to be called 'The Mistress'..."_ - Memoirs of John Nathan Turner

    • @carealoo744
      @carealoo744 Рік тому +51

      @@ftumschk They went above and beyond with that.

    • @ShamrockParticle
      @ShamrockParticle Рік тому +20

      @@carealoo744 to such an extent that JNT loved the new character in the way Pip and Jane Baker crafted her nuances, as well as a number of fans.

    • @ftumschk
      @ftumschk Рік тому +13

      @@carealoo744 I found her rather unremarkable as a villain, tbh, but that's not to diminish Kate O'Mara's performance. She was brilliant in both her stories, but they might as well have written them around the Master.

  • @lazulenoc6863
    @lazulenoc6863 Рік тому +152

    I like the idea of Omega being a guy who's just standing in a random wardrobe or wandering aimlessly in a BBC warehouse. Maybe he'll just wander on set, get confused and wander back to his warehouse. That would be a great visual joke the next time a crazy person brings Gallifrey back.

    • @warrenny1168
      @warrenny1168 Рік тому +2

      Surely omegastill alive stuck in the antimatter universe or whatevernit is?

  • @andrewhayden9545
    @andrewhayden9545 Рік тому +250

    I’m sorry Harbo but The Rani and The Master are in no way the same beyond both being Time Lords. The Master is someone who wants to rule the universe purely for power and is obsessed with The Doctor meanwhile The Rani is a scientist who who wants to gain knowledge and will do it by any means necessary. She doesn’t care about The Doctor or The Master unless she needs to use them for something like in ‘Time of The Rani’.

    • @brianartillery
      @brianartillery Рік тому

      The Rani has no respect for either The Master, or The Doctor. She sees them both as idiots, always trying to defeat each other. She's a scientist with no scruples or morals. She experimented on the simple inhabitants of the planet Miasimia Goria, to enhance their awareness, but just made them violent.
      That's the kind of person she is - viewing the people of a quiet planet, as expendable laboratory fodder for her evil experiments.

    • @mleav2
      @mleav2 Рік тому +13

      Also the Rani is potentially more dangerous as she is not insane.

    • @honesto4696
      @honesto4696 Рік тому +4

      The Rani is also a part of The Doctor's backstory. While probably not as close as The Master ever was, The Doctor and The Rani have some kind of history together. I couldn't formerly recall, or find if they attended The Timelord Academy together, but according to the classic story, Time and The Rani, they share the same age (speculative), and she said that The Doctor specialized in thermodynamics (he might have had different specialties, but she definitely knew that he was very proficient in this). Plus, one of her experiments caused Lord President Pandad to regenerate. Any Timelord, who was able to have themself, or one their experiments get that close to him, must have been valued as a significant scientific asset. Also, any Timelord who caused the president to regenerate, would be deemed a significant threat to their government.

  • @ptolemeeselenion1542
    @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому +69

    Some theories speculates that the High Priestess Ohila of the Sisterhood of Karn might be an incarnation of The Rani who rejected her identity and evil, psychotic experimentations-- which would explain why both her and The Doctor acts so familiar toward each other, as well as her schemes and behavior been reminiscent of The Rani.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 Рік тому +2

      that makes way too much sense…of course that would be too farfetched even for Doctor Who

  • @TheManInBlueFlames
    @TheManInBlueFlames Рік тому +13

    My fantasy/headcannon is that Rani from the Sarah Jane Adventures is actually THE RANI regenerated, but has one of those time lord watches to stop her remembering. The reason she chose to hide her identity is A) the theoretical destruction of gallifrey B) She wanted to get close to the Doctor so that she could do a deal with the Trickster to stop him by targeting a close ally.

  • @aeloswindrunner
    @aeloswindrunner Рік тому +167

    I suppose you could have the Rani surviving the Master's razing of Gallifrey, and seeking revenge against the Master. Maybe their conflict has a huge risk of collateral damage so the Doctor needs to intervene

    • @patchodraws9200
      @patchodraws9200 Рік тому +15

      or maybe her and the doctor have to reluctantly team up to stop the master, albeit with different motives (justice vs. revenge). it could eventually lead to a very dramatic falling out, or just a series of interesting philosophical debates about the nature of what they each do, leaving the rani to vanish after the story with a tenuous at best relationship with the doctor (and the potential for a future villain story for her).

    • @ptolemeeselenion1542
      @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому

      Hm.

    • @greghawkins59
      @greghawkins59 Рік тому +3

      Love that idea actually

    • @fmlazar
      @fmlazar Рік тому +14

      She was a rogue time lord in exile, no need for her to have been on Galifrey when it was decimated.

    • @parrot998
      @parrot998 Рік тому +8

      The simple idea that The Master got everyone with whatever he did is rediculous on it's face. He said he did, but of course he said he did... He might even somehow believe he did... Gallifrey as a political power is gone, but it's pretty clear a decent amount of the Timelords fled to the winds. Flux even all but confirmed this in it's first episode through the heavy amount of implying that Swarm's guard is a Timelord... Not only because absorbing her allowed him to regenerate, but because she had been watching him for literal millenia.

  • @XiscoLozdob
    @XiscoLozdob Рік тому +10

    The Master and the Rani are such fundamentally different characters that I don't know how you could make "a Master story that just has the Rani in it", especially considering how important the relationship between the Master and the Doctor has become in the modern series. Not only are her motivations completely different, and a nice change of pace, but the way she'd interact with the Doctor should change drastically too. I mean, it could happen, but we haven't had "a Sontara story that just had the Cybermen in it" yet, so I'm sure they'd do something interesting with her if it ever happens.

  • @sh-spectrum409
    @sh-spectrum409 Рік тому +29

    IIRC I heard speculations about the Timeless Child actually being the Rani which would’ve fitted considering how self-absorbed of a character she is and the Doctor was in fact experimented on by the Rani and that’s why he has those repressed memories.

  • @bsabruzzo
    @bsabruzzo Рік тому +73

    The Master has become the Joker to the Doctor's Batman. The Rani would have been more of a Riddler. And before we say that the Great Intelligence was that, that villain was more a Dr. Hugo Strange. I'm sure the Meddling Monk and the others can get representation, too. But the Rani was always more of a thinker and the Master became more of a "destroy the wold" madman.

    • @creed8712
      @creed8712 Рік тому +1

      Rani as characterized in her first story’s basically Dr strange in they are both morally bankrupt scientists

    • @bsabruzzo
      @bsabruzzo Рік тому +3

      @@creed8712 I can see that.
      My point is, she is not just a "female Master".

    • @charlestownsend9280
      @charlestownsend9280 Рік тому +1

      If we're going with the batman thing I think the monk is red hood, as they're basically the doctor but with no restraints when it comes to changing time, just like how red hood is batman with no restraints on killing.
      Omega is two face, a character who tried making everyone's lives better and got horribly injured because of it and has now been driven mad. That one fits really well.
      The valeyard is the batman who laughs.
      Rassilon is raz al goul.

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 Рік тому

      nah, she was Hugo Strange to The Doctor’s Batman

    • @bostonrailfan2427
      @bostonrailfan2427 Рік тому

      @@creed8712 exactly, Hugo Strange to the Batman

  • @calumgardner6936
    @calumgardner6936 Рік тому +17

    Even if RTD could never bring The Rani back in his new run of the show for Ncuti to face off against, the idea of a brand new rouge time lord whether good or bad that could actually give both The Master AND The Doctor a run for their money (which is what I think Moffat & Neil Gaiman gave us a little morsel of in The Doctor’s Wife with The Corsair) would be a pretty cool idea to bring into the mix and would nicely skate around the problem

  • @shmikex
    @shmikex Рік тому +22

    Tecteun should have been revealed to be The Rani. The scientist with no ethics, once she experimented on her adopted daughter enough to be able to control the secret to regeneration, she has since been looking for the next thing to top that, and no longer has the attachment of her daughter and therefore dropped her original name for something more Timelordy I guess. Eventually she joins the Time War and in a moment of softness as "The Woman" at the End of Time who looks at the Doctor when the rift opens. And finally once Galifrey is free from the time lock she escapes to the world between worlds and re-claims her identity as Tecteun.

    • @3000agape
      @3000agape Рік тому +4

      Fascinating.

    • @SammEater
      @SammEater Рік тому +1

      This would require the writer to actually be good instead of a hack fraud working with Chibs.

  • @Krshna28
    @Krshna28 Рік тому +14

    We need some Timelord charaters that are not the Master.
    Also also some new villains that can have recurring apperances.
    I would like a good 2-4 series without the Master, Daleks and Cybermen.

  • @Josh-ze6xo
    @Josh-ze6xo Рік тому +33

    I just want to see more new rogue timelords that while maybe not villains could maybe morally neutral/grey

  • @jbcatz5
    @jbcatz5 Рік тому +21

    The Monk would be ideal for a new series appearance. He opens up an ethical examination of what kind and how much interference is justified, and what crosses the line. Like his debut in The Time Meddler it’s perfect for a pseudo historical, having a historical setting without having to shoehorn a monster or racist in because the conflict comes from the Monk’s interference.

    • @doctorvanya
      @doctorvanya Рік тому +6

      I think there's definite untapped potential in the Monk. Today's audiences are much more savvy in about the idea of changing history and alternate timelines, meaning there's much more you could do with the concept. He's not villainous in the same way as the Master so could open up alternative story possibilities.

  • @patchodraws9200
    @patchodraws9200 Рік тому +58

    if they ever got their hands on the right to use her, i feel like the best way to do her justice would be to focus more on her as a mad scientist than as a time lord. not only could that make for some interesting stories (the world always needs more mad scientists, especially lady ones - looking at you doctor olivia octavius), it would allow them to actually characterize her beyond just the idea that she's the female master or the other evil timelord. let the rani be her own villain who just so happens to also be a timelord !!

  • @paulwright774
    @paulwright774 Рік тому +17

    I think the main reason people have wanted the Rani to return is because of red herrings that were placed back during the Donna Noble era to keep the fans speculating and theorizing. RTD was real good at keeping us guessing and I'm really looking forward to him coming back to the series nice and refreshed. I can live without The Rani coming back. Regarding timelords they should bring back though... I think most of us can agree that a course correction is required on the whole timelords wiped out by The Master thing.

    • @senonimoustv2497
      @senonimoustv2497 Рік тому +1

      Ehh I get wanting to dustance yourself from the timeless child fiasco but the timelords being deas or mostly dead added weight to the Doctor as a character. The less you see of the timelords the more ancient and cool they seem.

  • @masterkyoogway3565
    @masterkyoogway3565 Рік тому +14

    I'd love them to bring her back of they focused more on the "evil scientist" side of her, cause that's what drew me to her in comparison to the master who was just evil for the chaos.

  • @thomasjohnson8391
    @thomasjohnson8391 Рік тому +16

    I have a theory The Rani used the chameleon arch to turn herself into Jackie from ab fab to hide and have died after. And also she was one of the children of gallifrey who was inspired by the time vortex. And she appeared in dimensions in time

    • @Tigershark_3082
      @Tigershark_3082 Рік тому +3

      @@owntmpsn I mean, Jackie and The Ranni *do* look kinda similar

    • @ShamrockParticle
      @ShamrockParticle Рік тому +2

      LOL, nice tie-in and Kate nails it in AbFab

  • @SenecaOmega
    @SenecaOmega Рік тому +2

    I read quite some time ago, that RTD stated that at the end of the Last of the Time Lords the hand that was seen picking up Saxon's signet ring was intended to be the Rani, but was changed to be Lucy Saxon. Does anyone else remember this?

  • @mostamused2797
    @mostamused2797 Рік тому +7

    Never knew about the copyright problem. Thanks for the info. I would love to see Lalla Ward back as Romana. Maybe even regenerate into Idris Alba!

  • @DavidProv
    @DavidProv Рік тому +17

    I honestly thought Missy was The Rani for almost ALL of series 8...like up until she revealed herself to be the newest incarnation of the Master.

    • @Chloe1sylvester1234
      @Chloe1sylvester1234 Рік тому +4

      Missy was supposed to be the Rani but The Master is more popular so the produces made her The Master instead.

  • @OperativeD
    @OperativeD Рік тому +5

    I've learned over the years to "Never Say Never" I hope the character is able to return one day. She's more than just a "female Master" and could certainly shake things up with her experimental researcher gimmick. Possibly lower stakes in terms of Who, but after so many "universe ending" perils I think it's time to take things down a notch.

  • @terrencezellers9105
    @terrencezellers9105 Рік тому +6

    Been a VERY long time .... but I vaguely recall a line or two in Time of the Rani that hinted to past intimacy between the Rani and the Doctor, possibly a marriage long before the episode's events. It hinted to what was then a near blank slate of the Doctor's past more mundane life.

  • @BinroWasRight
    @BinroWasRight 7 місяців тому +2

    You're probably right. The Rani is a great concept that has been done infamously poorly twice. At this point, as much as I love the recent incarnations of the Master, I am ready for a break from the Doctor's archnemesis. Seeing the War Chief, Monk, Rani, Valeyard and/or Omega again, properly spaced out of course and with them doing something new and interesting that doesn't just make them a Master cipher, would be lovely. In her debut 'The Mark of the Rani' I loved the contrast between sassy but moral hero (Doctor), moustache-twirling and malevolent immoral villain (Master) and cold and detached amoral scientist (Rani).

  • @roberts.2300
    @roberts.2300 Рік тому +9

    Honestly the Rani is a bit of a back list type of rouge timelord. Unless they heavily differentiate her from the master. Lean more into the mad scientist angle with the next incarnation.
    Beyond the two Rogues I would love to show up would be the Monk or Big Finsh's The Eleven. I would love to see an onscreen appearance of Marc Bonnard character including other incarnations.

  • @captainsinclair7954
    @captainsinclair7954 Рік тому +5

    Rather than a new Anti-Doctor Timelord character, the writers should make an antihero Timelord: i.e. a Timelord who The Doctor doesn’t find to be a good ally, but someone who will aid them in defeating a common foe. And this antihero Timelord could have an arc over many seasons where they become more of an actual hero.
    I could especially see this being a Timelord from the middle to late part of the Time War, narrowly escaping in a Battle Tardis with a nearly depleted supply of munitions. A Doctor-like Character with actual “teeth” to bite with instead of just bark bark bark… the possibilities are endless.

    • @ArgentWolf95
      @ArgentWolf95 Рік тому +1

      that would be interesting, a time lord who is more willing to destroy his enemies with less ethical means but for the right reasons.

  • @Nightman221k
    @Nightman221k Рік тому +27

    I wish the Rani could show up again. I did always wonder why she never showed up. Thanks for explaining it.

    • @richallenxbox1976
      @richallenxbox1976 Рік тому

      Meh, she only ever showed up about twice in the classic series, towards the end of the Colin Baker era of the mid to late 80s.

  • @philnewton-england7795
    @philnewton-england7795 Рік тому +3

    I always wanted The Rani to come back, but after seeing what they did to The Doctor and The Master, I'm quite glad they didn't.

  • @lillywaters
    @lillywaters Рік тому +5

    honestly, i think she could easily be used in new who. She is a different character and what her goals are in a lot of ways a lot darker than the master due to the fact she tries to hide behind science for her cruelty...i also think she would have had no part in the war but instead used it to cover up some of her experiments as everyone was so focused on the time war. I believe she can be a character who can stand on her own without being overshadowed by the master, and in fact, she could easily use the master when she wanted to.

  • @basilbrush9075
    @basilbrush9075 Рік тому +2

    I thought the master was the meddling monk but then I realised I was just watching Derek Jacobi in Cadfael

  • @timothyweers8054
    @timothyweers8054 Рік тому +3

    One timelord to return could be Drax from Armageddon Factor, he could be as you say up to his toenails in trouble and the Doctor has to bail him out as he likes to freelance in helping out and doesn't take much to do something wrong.

  • @UnderhillKoufax
    @UnderhillKoufax Рік тому +3

    I always thought the Rani was indirectly referenced in “Midnight” as Sky Silvestry’s malicious and powerful past relationship. It would explain the “Midnight Monster” as a villain sent by the Rani to kill Sky.

  • @robo3007
    @robo3007 6 місяців тому +2

    I think with the new introduction of Mrs Flood, the Rani is the strong favourite for being her real identity. There's a small chance she could be someone else like River Song or Susan, but I've recently made a list of 20 candidates of who Mrs Flood could be in order of decreasing likelihood and the Rani was firmly placed at number 1.

  • @ThetaSigma-vu1sk
    @ThetaSigma-vu1sk Рік тому +7

    i would really like a whole new time lord villain to be honest...

  • @Jedi_Spartan
    @Jedi_Spartan Рік тому +8

    Nah... we're definitely getting 'The Five Ranis' as the next Doctor Who Christmas Special: ua-cam.com/video/5JX0rVMpnsk/v-deo.html

  • @tomw4014
    @tomw4014 Рік тому

    Another awesome video, great arguments for both sides!

  • @geesefeeders1
    @geesefeeders1 Рік тому +24

    Come on Harbo of course Donna will return. She/they are literally in the leaks & new trailer 😒

    • @randomtheorist251
      @randomtheorist251 Рік тому

      Have you actually watched the video?

    • @BBK113
      @BBK113 Рік тому +11

      @@randomtheorist251 it's clearly a joke, plus they a patron so they have

    • @evanmarshall9571
      @evanmarshall9571 Рік тому +1

      @@randomtheorist251 Like rory was theorized to be the master, donna was theorized to be the rani, so it's a joke on that

    • @randomtheorist251
      @randomtheorist251 Рік тому

      @@evanmarshall9571 Ah OK didn't know that.

    • @ptolemeeselenion1542
      @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому +3

      She.

  • @jojoke2909
    @jojoke2909 Рік тому +4

    Only reason Im fine with the Rani coming back is just because im sick of it being just the master every time, it would be a nice break and new who fans get a bit more classic re introduced, rani has a better reason for doing what they do, the master just does shit to be goofy and evil

  • @HeyJay2000
    @HeyJay2000 Рік тому +8

    So basically they could come back. 😅😅
    There are complications, but The Rani can still come back. It is more that she shouldn't come back rather than she couldn't.
    I do think the Showrunners should bring back more time Lords, cause although they are quite boring I think that is literally the reason to being then back, to flesh them out and actually make them fun and interesting.
    Plus like you said The Master is over used now.

    • @VelociraptorsOfSkyrim
      @VelociraptorsOfSkyrim Рік тому

      They could, on paper.
      But with the practical Impossibility of getting the rights to the Rani with the passing of her creators, that turns the "Shouldn't" into a "couldn't."

    • @HeyJay2000
      @HeyJay2000 Рік тому +1

      @@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim but it isn't impossible. He even says that in the video. It would just be really really hard. But not impossible.
      What he basically says is that even if The BBC can get the rights to her, they shouldn't use her cause it wouldn't be that interesting.
      So it is more of a Shouldn't rather than Couldn't. Cause they Can do it if they wanted to. They probably just don't want to, cause they have no interest in bringing the character back. Cause if they wanted to they definitely would have by now. Same goes for Omega and The Meddling Monk. People just want to use The Master for some reason.

  • @IDidntSetAHandle
    @IDidntSetAHandle Рік тому +6

    The fact is that character rights are worthless unless you actually allow the character to be used. So as much as the Beeb would need to seek an agreement with these various estates, they're always going to release their use eventually, because otherwise they're tightly gripping something that gets less relevant every passing year they don't allow their use.

  • @xyon172
    @xyon172 Рік тому +2

    With new Who, The Master just gets more nutty and dastardly. The Rani looked down on both the Doctor and The Master. The Doctor fo his Mrals, and the Master for his lack of vision. With the way the show is produced now and the character growth afforded, I still think The Rani could bring a very dfferent dynamic to the now over trodden battle of the equal but opposite Time Lord.
    She may not be NEEDED, but a good team could use her to work against the Doctor in ways The Master has kind of moved past or can't seem to be written in to.

  • @prometheuskayne9320
    @prometheuskayne9320 Рік тому +3

    What about the Valeyard? Honestly, their are plenty of rogue Time Lords, who most likely would never have returned to Gallifrey.. It seems to me they might all be a bit upset with the Doctor always interfering with things... it's not like they wouldn't notice. They don't necessarily have to be opponents to the Doctor, either. Perhaps they need help, stranded without a Tardis, etc.

  • @robertmolnar8543
    @robertmolnar8543 Рік тому +1

    To be honest i came up with an idea for what could be a great story and would ultimately be rather interesting in my opinion it would be the Rani working with what remains of the Great Intelligence to gain ultimate knowledge and would involve not only her capturing both the Doctor and the Master but pulling seven deceased timelords from the timeline as well, similar to what the 12th Doctor did with Clara, which would lead to a reunion and first on screen appearance of the Deca, which would both be a great easter egg for long time Doctor Who fans but could also introduce a great piece of the lore and the Doctor's past to more recent viewers as well, but also said plan would end up wiping most if not all sentient life in the universe if successful which since the Rani is an uncaring sociopathic scientist I can see her doing such a thing so long as she completed her experiment and ultimately one of my hopes for this potential story would be the return to multi part stories like we had in Classic Doctor Who rather than the episodic formula we have now in Modern Docter Who.

  • @senonimoustv2497
    @senonimoustv2497 Рік тому +2

    There are so many Time Lord and Old omes villains currently not used.
    Omega
    Black Guardian
    The Vampires
    Just name a few.

  • @PsyrenXY
    @PsyrenXY Рік тому +1

    During Flux (wait, hear me out) I thought for sure the Rani would be the lady running The Division with the Fugutive Doctor (Jo Martin) until that turned out to be Tecteun

  • @Paradox-es3bl
    @Paradox-es3bl Рік тому +3

    An easy solution would be to make the Ranni not pure evil, like the Master is. Make them more an agent of chaos, closer to Harley Quinn these days. Sometimes she goes back to helping Joker or other villainy, and sometimes she's literally saving Batman or others even from Joker. If you never knew what they'd do, it could really work. Especially if we get something like The Doctor going around trying to fight someone who is CLEARLY The Master, but then The Master comes in and triggers a Regeneration (half-killing the Ranni), revealing that there definitely IS another Timelord, that might be a threat, but it's NOT The Master. Or vice-versa, basically. Perhaps the Ranni kamikazes The Master, making them both Regenerate. That could be a very shocking reveal.
    I would probably do some sort of psychological deep-dive mixed with conspiracy theory type stuff, basically saying, "Oh, the Ranni has multiple personalities, Dissociative Identity Disorder." (Or whatever) and not only does it persist through Regenerations, but a switch in Alters is triggered by a Regeneration. Then just have at least 3 personalities. One that's at least mostly good, one mostly bad, and one a bit more in the middle.
    That way, when the "good Ranni" kamikazes The Master, we don't know if they'll go full bad or more neutral. And if the bad or neutral one Regens, we don't know if they'll go full good or not. It's probably even better with 4 personalities, but maybe The Doctor/The Master, whoever gives the exposition, only knows of 3? And I think one should be quite selfish, but not evil. Like, they don't get joy from hurting others or go out of their way to do so, but they also won't make any significant effort to help others, unless they think it'll directly benefit them. Perhaps more of a bounty hunter/mercenary type. Could even be revealed that Merc Ranni kamikazed The Master because they only had 1 Regen left and were promised a new set by the Timelords. (Give them some device so they get a new set regardless of if the other Timelords survived or not. Just have a little flashback to when the others WERE still alive, giving this mission and device. I'm not a writer so I'm not even going to attempt to explain why this mission was given to the Ranni before the Timelords got wiped out... Perhaps a prophecy like the one that foresaw The Doctor's death? Idk. Let actual writers figure it out lol.)

  • @ptolemeeselenion1542
    @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому +3

    @11:22 Actually some more, if you count Perusa, the War Chief... and, to some extent, the Celestial Toymaker (he's a conceptual being, but it has been stated in the Wilderness Era novels that he has been hosting the body of a Time Lord and childhood friend of both the Doctor, the Rani and The Master for untold aeons, least until the Fifth Doctor deletes the Celestial Toymaker off-series) .

    • @parrot998
      @parrot998 Рік тому +3

      Don't forget Morbius, plus all the great Timelord villains from Big Finish.

    • @ptolemeeselenion1542
      @ptolemeeselenion1542 Рік тому +1

      @@parrot998 Indeed!

  • @EyeOfOrion
    @EyeOfOrion Рік тому +1

    In the 60th, we'll see someone named Shirley Anne Bingham.
    shiRley ANne bIngham.
    Hmmm...
    R A N I

  • @benmiller3252
    @benmiller3252 Рік тому +2

    Maybe with Russell T Davies back in The Showrunner's chair 💺 for 60th Anniversary and series beyond. Maybe there's a potential chance that he could bring back The Rani. But never say never

  • @christophergraewin3992
    @christophergraewin3992 Рік тому +1

    I would think that the destruction of Gallifrey would be irrelevant, since the Time Lords had banished the Rani.

  • @pete2097
    @pete2097 Рік тому +2

    You realise what you've done....
    The Rani will be in one of the 3 specials now....

  • @greghawkins59
    @greghawkins59 Рік тому

    I wouldn't mind a cheeky bit of meddling monk

  • @ObservantPiratePlus
    @ObservantPiratePlus Рік тому +2

    So just create a new "Daughter of the Rani" character, out for revenge for how her mother was treated by the Doctor. Sorted!

  • @mathieuleader8601
    @mathieuleader8601 Рік тому +2

    I would love to see the 11 make their big screen debut

  • @ghostmachine71
    @ghostmachine71 Рік тому +2

    I'm thinking its more likely the Rani will show up before Susan does. I know she's been in some Big Finish audios and some books, but its waaaay past time for her to re-appear on the show.

  • @lasseehrenreich5502
    @lasseehrenreich5502 Рік тому +1

    Hey Harbo, very good video. Just out of curiosity does that law about writers owning the things they created - so if I wrote an episode for Doctor Who and created a species would I then be the legal owner?

    • @HarboWholmes
      @HarboWholmes  Рік тому +3

      In the Classic Who era, yes, probably (depends on co-writers etc) but not these days

    • @xGOKOPx
      @xGOKOPx Рік тому

      It was only a thing during classic who. Nowadays all rights belong to BBC

    • @lasseehrenreich5502
      @lasseehrenreich5502 Рік тому

      @@HarboWholmes ok thank you

  • @MoYvStarkey
    @MoYvStarkey Рік тому +1

    I illustrated those three Auton spin off CDs. Imagine my surprise seeing them here. I'm a fan of the Rani. She's a character who needs someone who would do her justice. Thanks for this vid.

  • @chrisgraham9064
    @chrisgraham9064 Рік тому

    Brilliant content. I still had ope one day the Rani returns. I like her when she's a mad scientist.

  • @GambitArkana
    @GambitArkana Рік тому +1

    I personally thought Missy was Rani. I was like omg they brought her back.

  • @AnimeOtakuDrew
    @AnimeOtakuDrew Рік тому +1

    What about the chances of a new story featuring the Valeyard? Since the Valeyard is allegedly a future incarnation of the Doctor, the destruction of Gallifrey would have no bearing on his presence (not that it should anyways since, through time travel, there could be any number of past Time Lords that the Doctor could encounter on their own travels, not to mention the possibility of Time Lords who were not present on Gallifrey at the time of its destruction . . . which I would say is VERY likely with a renegade like the Rani).

  • @sanddagger36
    @sanddagger36 Рік тому +1

    6:53 best quote ever

  • @martinbennett8752
    @martinbennett8752 Рік тому +1

    I think the Rani undermined the whole "there have never been any strong female characters on the show" argument.
    Rani can mean 'Queen', but to add to the mess that the show has got itself into, if the Master can come back as female Missy, maybe the Rani can regenerate into a male Quara?
    I would expect all the renegades would have been called up for the war against the Daleks and would have enjoyed the experience of being asked to help save their people. The Master fled to the end of time to escape it after a while, the Rani may have done something similar.
    The big hole in the narrative was that the whole Gallifrey being destroyed - and then moved into a pocket dimension thing, was the assertions that as the Daleks survived the Time War, if the TimeLords ever returned the TimeWar would start all over again - and then the writers brought Gallifrey back. If they wanted the Doctor to regenerate more than 12 times they might have pondered on the Sisterhood of the Flame on Karn, probably descendants of the Pythia and her followers who might have been able to give the Doctor a further set of lives. Then THAT was undermined by the nonsense of the Timeless Child which seemed the establish that the doctor could regenerate ad infinitum, which also holed below the waterline all those lines about the Doctor the Master and the Rani being at school together. Fortunately, I had stopped watching or being interested in the programme long before that. Capaldi put the final nail in the coffin for me.

  • @willgillies5670
    @willgillies5670 Рік тому +1

    I always thought the closest we came to the Rani was Matron Kofelia.

  • @JagoHazzard
    @JagoHazzard Рік тому

    I think the Rani would be a great character to bring into the Time War. Where better to place a scientist with no ethics than a situation where the normal rules don't apply?

  • @DNulrammah
    @DNulrammah Рік тому +1

    You are assuming, of course that the Rani would of been on Gallifrey WHEN everyone was killed... Unless she was incarcerated by the Time Lords, she would be somewhere far away. And there IS the possibility that the Master would of spared her because of her expertise.

  • @Azphreal
    @Azphreal Рік тому +1

    The fact that Timelords can travel in time why would you not have timelords appearing after the planet vanished? If the BBC did find the owner of the Rani character it would be easy to get to use her (or him the way things are now) the BBC get the rights just to the character appearing in the show (and spinoffs) which would bring the character back into the public view then the rights holders can make deals with the toy companies or other merchandise. They are making nothing from the character at the moment and will not do unless it is used. Imagine a story where the Masters plans are foiled but it was not the Doctor but the Rani as his plans caused problems with what she was doing.

  • @jeremymcclary3901
    @jeremymcclary3901 Рік тому +1

    I believe she already did, but she was labeled the "Fugitive Doctor".

  • @DanBen07
    @DanBen07 Рік тому

    Good video👍

  • @richardrichardson2568
    @richardrichardson2568 Рік тому +1

    personally i do belive they did bring the rani back but didnt call her the ranin and of course im on about the timelord who hired the jadoon to capyure the fugitive doctor in the epic episode fugitive of the jadoon

  • @dj1NM3
    @dj1NM3 6 місяців тому

    At 06:52 that is precisely what I was thinking about when the Doctor was moaning about "being the only Timelord in the village".
    The other Timelords mentioned never died on screen, so there was never any real reason, apart from not bothering (or, pig-headedly refusing) to secure the rights and write an episode featuring them. Even Jenny (the Doctor's clone daughter) seems to have evaporated, despite being shown to regenerate and stealing a spaceship to fly off (apparently into oblivion).

  • @cjmckay309
    @cjmckay309 Рік тому

    "Because, you know, you've gotta get that tasty social media engagement" he said, in a video with a clickbait tile.

  • @quickflash2studios232
    @quickflash2studios232 Рік тому +1

    I’d love some Time Lord refugees, either from the Time War or The Master’s recent Death Particle thing. I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to find Romana trying to rehouse some Refugees with a stolen TARDIS.

  • @filmunion8194
    @filmunion8194 Рік тому +1

    Gillian Anderson sent from the X-Files, was supposed to play the Rani

  • @michaelkeith8992
    @michaelkeith8992 Рік тому +1

    Not evil, but what about Drax? He was an old academy chum of the Doctor that we saw in one of the Key to Time episodes.

  • @seanembery9391
    @seanembery9391 Рік тому +2

    The Rani wasn't strictly evil. She was a scientist first & foremost. Focused on her research, bit arrogant with it as many scientists can be. Results first.
    If her test subjects went wrong she simply put them down.
    Biolabs everywhere do the same thing with "lower" life forms all the time.
    She probably spent the whole timewar getting on with what she was doing as far away as possible & ignored it 'til it got in her way.

  • @tbnrprimestudios1232
    @tbnrprimestudios1232 Рік тому +1

    The Rani was a scientist who cared nothing about the master and Doctor The Rani didn’t care unless it came to her research

  • @OrishiBlackMoses
    @OrishiBlackMoses Рік тому +1

    I maybe missing something seeing as it's been quite some time since I've seen the Rani, I think it was during the 7th Dr's series when she wanted his brain I think. I forget what happened to her by the end of that series. But the point is why is iit assumed that she was on Gallifrey when the Master Destroyed the Time Lords. I can see this if in the Big Finish books she had returned to Gallifrey, remember she had been Banished in the tv series for her Unethical Experiments.

  • @teejai5291
    @teejai5291 Рік тому

    How weird. I work out of a depot in Aylesford! Nice area, particularly the Priory. Random

  • @Redboots
    @Redboots Рік тому +2

    tbh the only reason to bring back the rani is to stop people nagging. though the rani specialised in evil chemistry, and with a bit of a refresh with character depth, you could make her distinct from the master and give the master a break from being the big time lord baddie, so it's definitely possible to achieve, but of course, it's not necessarily practical. anyway I wiped tecteun from my memory because survivors of the flux was unnecessary apart from the yaz/dan/jericho trio lmao

  • @frankshailes3205
    @frankshailes3205 Рік тому +2

    Isn't she back in Big Finish? And she was definitely on-screen since 1987, and seen by more viewers than ever before, in 1993's Dimensions in Time.

    • @momokomiyafuji396
      @momokomiyafuji396 Рік тому

      So you basically commented without watching the video, right? Since all of this is discussed.

    • @VelociraptorsOfSkyrim
      @VelociraptorsOfSkyrim Рік тому

      How to say that you commented without watching the video without saying you commented without watching the video.

    • @frankshailes3205
      @frankshailes3205 Рік тому +2

      @@momokomiyafuji396 I watched the video to the point where he said she hadn't been on screen since 1987, yes. And a bit beyond that to see if he corrected that statement. Since he didn't, I stopped watching as I hate inaccuracy from opinionated fan videos full of errors.

    • @White.Rabbit.Productions
      @White.Rabbit.Productions Рік тому

      @@frankshailes3205 This is unfortunately what I've come to expect from Harbo, which is why I don't subscribe to his channel.

  • @kurtsnyder4752
    @kurtsnyder4752 Рік тому

    Would be fascinating for a return, maybe like the DC Comic's Harleen Quinnzell or William "Spike" Pratt on Buffy The Vampire Slayer to take on a journey to become a hero; the first who has been that comic's continuity's big villain's right hand girl, breaking away and now even has the trust of the Batman, no easy feat there, the second a mortal enemy of the heroines of the story, corrupted but battles to regain his soul and becomes lover/fellow warrior of the good with Slayer Prime Buffy. Though this HAS been kind of done with Michelle Gomez's run as Missy. The trope is the "heel face turn".

    • @kurtsnyder4752
      @kurtsnyder4752 Рік тому

      Kurt Snyder Almost let slip the Marvel Elekktra character, assassin turned Avenger, like Natasha Romanov the Black Widow; and Lana Parrilla's Once Upon A Time tv show's "Evil" Queen and her journey. Even Angelina Jolie's Malificent.

  • @mrsamaritan6881
    @mrsamaritan6881 Рік тому

    You forgot the Warchief in your mentions of rogue Time Lords.

  • @bob23301
    @bob23301 Рік тому

    What are those two daleks with Nation, they look like early versons of the eternal daleks from 2010, with the humped back.

  • @carealoo744
    @carealoo744 Рік тому +1

    I want an episode where someone is revealed to be The Rani, but then it's later revealed that it's not the Real Rani and was some fob-watch "Next Doctor" style spell thing to make her think she was the Rani when she wasn't, and at the end The Doctor says:
    "Oh I don't think I'll ever be seeing the Real Rani again."
    That would be the greatest Doctor Who episode of all time.

  • @omegatired
    @omegatired Рік тому

    Sudden realization, actually, if one wants more of the Rani, try the Stargate SG1 eps with Neerti ... what a homage to Dr. Who ...

  • @9124Nove
    @9124Nove Рік тому

    The moment I saw the sharp shoulder pads on the silhouette, I knew it had to be The Rani. 🤣

  • @chrisparkes2179
    @chrisparkes2179 Рік тому

    Terry Nation grew rich on the Daleks, while Ray Cusick received a one off £50 for his iconic design. Had Mervyn Winfield had his way the Daleks would have been played by men with cardboard tubes over their limbs and been seen as a silly monster from a long forgotten sci fi show.
    BBC didn't hold the rights to the police box design because police boxes were common street furniture. It was like trying to copyright lampposts. It was only when a court ruled that the original function had been largely forgotten that copyright was given.

  • @Domihork
    @Domihork Рік тому

    The Rani being a scientist with no ethics would work perfectly for season 8 Missy. But then the rest of Missy's story happened and I'm actually glad it was the Master. Seasons 9 and 10 of Missy were really great imho.

  • @elberno4243
    @elberno4243 Рік тому +1

    I believe The Rani, has been renamed Tecteun

  • @sarreqteryx
    @sarreqteryx 6 місяців тому

    she kind of was acknowledged in The Sarah Jane Adventures when the Doctor first met (not “The“) Rani

  • @Aaron-zt5ee
    @Aaron-zt5ee Рік тому

    I'm just proud that I recognized her by her silohuette.

  • @REOGURU
    @REOGURU 8 місяців тому

    Never watched that particular Doctor, so I had never heard of the Rani.

  • @DaveyGamingZX
    @DaveyGamingZX Рік тому

    Nick Briggs isn’t the owner of Big Finish, it’s Jason Haigh-Ellery.

  • @danielfreeman8136
    @danielfreeman8136 Рік тому

    The K'anpo / Cho-je timelord character was the most intriguing for me. I'd love to see a new incarnation of this character.

  • @R.senals_Arsenal
    @R.senals_Arsenal Рік тому +5

    This was good, appreaciate this type of info!
    Makes me wonder now about rights to things I'd like to return a whole lot more, such as the Rutans. Or Drax. Big Finish doesn't seem to have a problem using them.
    Maybe someone should make something small, like a figurine, of the Rani, and see who sues them so we can find the copyright holders! 🤣🤣🤣

  • @ronaldnelson6692
    @ronaldnelson6692 9 місяців тому

    Imagine bringing back Tecteun and revealing that she was the Rani. Both were characters that liked to experiment on people.

  • @stoagymahalo5268
    @stoagymahalo5268 Рік тому

    boy... here I thought you were going to bring up River Song

  • @Aquarium-Downunder
    @Aquarium-Downunder Рік тому

    working on the time line, a Rani Cyberman.
    The Rani a mad Cyberman scientist, driven totaly around the bend after getting turned into a cyberman, who is willing to kill any one who gets in the way of her bring back the time lords

  • @fmlazar
    @fmlazar Рік тому +1

    a Rani story SHOULD be structured specifically for her. She's a mad obsessed scientist, not the power and conquest obsessed Master. She would be a better choice than creating another new female timelord..... save perhaps maybe an evil version of Romana.