Conducting a Meta-Analysis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 лип 2024
  • This is a guided introduction to conducting meta-analyses based on an article by Field and Gillett (2010). Also included is a live demonstration of conducting a meta-analysis using IBM SPSS and R. The source files and data sets are available at bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wile...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @nehirryasarr
    @nehirryasarr 2 роки тому +1

    You saved my life with this video professor thank you so much for the most clear explanations!!!!!

  • @mandaraharikar
    @mandaraharikar 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you far laying this out so lucidly! You really have a knack for this, please make more explanatory videos 😁

  • @sherryhere8498
    @sherryhere8498 2 роки тому +1

    Wow! The thoroughness and simplicity of your presentation made understanding of meta analyses a piece if cake. Thank you, doc!

  • @sunchaoran8606
    @sunchaoran8606 2 роки тому

    Thank you! Really like this!

  • @darcymr4849
    @darcymr4849 4 роки тому +1

    very clear!Thank you!

  • @laxmanbisht2638
    @laxmanbisht2638 2 роки тому

    Thanks, professor!

  • @Imsolaris
    @Imsolaris 2 роки тому

    This is great, thanks!

  • @applegreen3086
    @applegreen3086 3 роки тому

    Thank You so much!!!

  • @FreddaRL
    @FreddaRL 3 роки тому +4

    Hi! Thank you very much for this presentation. I'm doing a meta-analysis on psychological contracts as my master thesis (first time doing anything like this). I'm wondering if you know how to use the Hunter Schmidt syntax file provided by Field and Gillett? I'm running into errors when trying to use it :)

  • @wobbel4487
    @wobbel4487 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you for this very clear step-by-step guide on conducting a meta-analysis. This is way more clearly explained than my professor tried to. It's too bad you did your analysis in SPSS, since R is way more generalized nowadays.

    • @professorkramer5937
      @professorkramer5937  2 роки тому +2

      Thank you so much! I much prefer R to SPSS. Perhaps I will record an R version in the future.

  • @GlynisDance
    @GlynisDance Рік тому

    Absolutely fascinating video! Thank you :)

  • @adambilbao2974
    @adambilbao2974 Рік тому +2

    you saved my research project thanks!

  • @mehreenfatima882
    @mehreenfatima882 2 роки тому +4

    Hello! Thankyou for the wonderful explanation. I just had a query. Is it possible to compare the effect sizes of two different variables with each other?

  • @dhunda6068
    @dhunda6068 4 роки тому

    thank you .

  • @soheilhassanipour5816
    @soheilhassanipour5816 4 роки тому

    Very cool.

  • @dr.terekibe7249
    @dr.terekibe7249 3 роки тому

    thank you proff

  • @subzero4579
    @subzero4579 4 місяці тому

    Thank you!!'

  • @bhairavik.1273
    @bhairavik.1273 3 роки тому

    Hi Professor Kramer, which is best method to calculate effect size? Pearson's r or cohen's d?

  • @dankschang
    @dankschang 3 роки тому

    Prof Kramer - can you lead me to your paper on meta-analysis, I intent to dive deep into the areas of my research. Thanks.

  • @peixotodacruz6028
    @peixotodacruz6028 2 роки тому

    Dr. Kramer, thank you kindly for a brilliant lecture on the basic of MA. It has been really helpful. I tried to find the supporting material on Canvas, as you mentioned in your lecture, but was not successful. Would you be kind and share the link of the repository where I could find the spreadsheets and scripts for both R and SPPS for mac. It would be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance for considering my request.

    • @professorkramer5937
      @professorkramer5937  2 роки тому

      Thank you so much! I'm glad you found it helpful. I updated the video description to include a link to the source files and data sets.

  • @GamesWithGavin12
    @GamesWithGavin12 5 років тому +7

    Hey make more videos dad keep doing videos

  • @jingliu514
    @jingliu514 3 роки тому

    👍

  • @sgx2380
    @sgx2380 3 роки тому +1

    Is there a minimum number of studies to be included for a research to be called a meta-analysis?

    • @professorkramer5937
      @professorkramer5937  3 роки тому +3

      Technically, the minimum is 2. However, the full answer is more detailed based on your study. You may find this link helpful: www.researchgate.net/post/Is_there_any_minimum_number_for_studies_that_should_be_included_in_meta-analysis

    • @georgegl3192
      @georgegl3192 3 роки тому +5

      Jackson and Turner recommend at least 5. See: Jackson, D., & Turner, R. (2017). Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(3), 290-302. doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1240

  • @piecesofme8531
    @piecesofme8531 4 роки тому +1

    Andy Field is the modern day Ronald Fisher.

    • @BloopyBlobBob
      @BloopyBlobBob 3 роки тому

      He taught my stats and R module at uni. Didn't realise how big he was until now ha

  • @hafizbilal15
    @hafizbilal15 2 роки тому +1

    Hi I cannot find a link to sample data sets

  • @Wisdombluetooth
    @Wisdombluetooth 3 роки тому

    I cannot download the sps file, they open as text

  • @user-yw9pp6dg1r
    @user-yw9pp6dg1r 3 роки тому

    А почему нет перевода?

  • @marksmith2738
    @marksmith2738 3 роки тому +6

    Why don't you explain what data is needed to calculate an effect size?

  • @chasti5754
    @chasti5754 3 роки тому +1

    I am sorry, but sometimes it is really hard to get what you say because you talk too fast, you mumble sometimes and you mention the references that are not on the slide, so it is hard to follow what you are referencing too... could not understand anything from the main part where you compare the fixed and random effects model

    • @sherryhere8498
      @sherryhere8498 2 роки тому

      Try customizing the video speed. I set it at 0.8x and it worked great with captions.